This application claims priority to Canadian Application No. 2,471,674 filed on Jun. 21, 2004, the contents of which arc incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to sound masking systems and methods. More specifically, the present invention is concerned with an auto-adjusting sound masking system and method.
Sound masking systems basically include a masking sound generator, an equalizer, a power amplifier and one or more loudspeakers.
As sound masking systems are being developed, it is now known that efficiency thereof is linked to their ability to emit an ideal masking noise spectrum with an adequate precision. The ideal masking noise is defined as achieving optimized speech privacy at a listener's position for example (Acoustical Design of Conventional Open Plan Offices, 2003).
A main challenge remains in adjusting this ideal spectrum to any target environment, taking into account a number of parameters including a size of the room, a coating of the walls of the room, the furniture of the room and the ambient noise for example. The masking noise is usually adjusted manually by 1 octave equalization or ⅓ octave equalization, which proves to be sufficient in cases of simple environments, for example in the case of a building with a very uniform construction with a limited number of masking loudspeakers. However, such a trial and error method is laborious and often yields poor results in the cases of larger environments. Indeed, larger masking systems may cover more than one room or workplace in a building for example, and each may need a specific masking sound level control.
U.S. Patent No. 4,438,526 to Thomalla, issued in 1984, discloses an automatic volume and frequency controlled sound masking system, wherein a masking noise is generated by a set of analog filters, and is adjusted during emission thereof, according to a noise measured by microphones. This system modifies the level and spectra of the sound masking noise generated in a room according to a background noise level in the room, by increasing the masking noise when the back ground noise increases. When there is no other noise, such as noise due to the activity of workers for example, in the room other than the background noise, the masking noise level and spectra generated by the system done according to a preset voltage. The preset voltage is adjusted manually to provide a predetermined DC output and thus a predetermined background noise level (the resulting masking noise) when the room is otherwise quiet.
In spite of these efforts, there is room in the art for an auto-adjusting sound masking system and a method allowing emitting a target masking noise.
There is provided a sound masking system emitting a target masking noise in a room, comprising a white noise generator and a mask filter, wherein the mask filter is automatically determined according to a correction of an acoustical response of the room, obtained when loudspeakers emit a white noise generated by the white noise generator, and to the target masking noise corrected by an ambient noise obtained when the loudspeakers are off; the mask filter once determined filtrating a white noise generated by the white noise generator to yield the target masking noise emitted in the room.
There is further provided a method for generating a target masking noise in a room, comprising: providing a white noise generator; selecting a target masking noise; determining a mask filter according to the selected target masking noise; and filtering a white noise generated by the white noise generator through the mask filter; whereby the step of determining a mask filter comprises obtaining an acoustical response and an ambient noise of the room and determining a target noise correction filter.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the appended drawings:
As illustrated in
determining a mask filter (step 20). A step of testing auto-adjustment of a masking noise generated through the mask filter determined in step 20 may be further contemplated (step 30).
In step 10, the acoustical response and the ambient noise of the room to be monitored are measured so as to determine the acoustical characteristics of the room in an emission frequency band of a target masking noise.
In step 20, a correction filter (line 42
More precisely, as shown in
It is to be noted that the method allows achieving the target masking noise as selected in advance. It may be desired to use as the target noise the so-called ideal masking noise as known in the art. It may be contemplated that the method provides a target masking noise set, by default, as this ideal masking noise. However, it may be desired to use a modified masking noise spectrum as the target masking noise spectrum (see for example
In step 30, a masking noise emitted as an output of the mask filter obtained in step 20 in the room is measured by microphones.
As illustrated in
The white noise generator 53 is based on a LCG technique (Linear Congruencial Generator) for example, which is known to allow a very long period for the random sequence and a fast implementation on a digital signal processor.
The masking noise generator 52 and an acquisition unit 54 connected to a drive unit 62 are embedded in a digital sound field processor board (DSP) 56. The drive unit 62 may be a PC for example.
For measuring the acoustical response of the room to be monitored, loudspeakers 60 are located at their final location in the room to be monitored. They may be, for example, located in a suspended ceiling of the room, in such a position that they emit towards the ceiling as is well known in the art. Alternatively, in absence of a suspended ceiling for example, they may be integrated into a structure of the room and emit downwards or upwards. As illustrated in
For measuring the ambient noise, the microphones 58 are activated without emission of the loudspeakers 60, and the drive unit 62 computes an average of a spectrum of the signal coming from the microphones 58.
One the mask filter 55 is determined according to the preselected target masking noise (see description above) the system is ready to emit the target masking noise.
It is possible to check the adjustment of the mask filter 55 by using the microphones for measuring the masking noise effectively emitted in the room through the mask filter 55, and by comparing the measured masking noise (fill line) with the target masking noise (dotted line), as illustrated in the graphs of
The system of the present invention allows taking into account the ambient noise, providing that the ambient noise is lower than the target masking noise. Ambient noise may include for example noise of ventilation systems, which may have levels equal and even higher than levels of the masking system in some frequency bands.
Moreover, the system of the present invention allows taking into account, for each room to be monitored, any acoustical coupling occurring between different zones of the building hosting the room, by generating the masking noise in the building in its entirety except from the room where the ambient noise is being measured. Therefore, the measured ambient noise includes the acoustical coupling with neighboring zones.
Interestingly, the DSP board processor comprises a single filter, which is auto-adjusted to take into account the frequency features of the room, the ambient noise and the target masking noise by including the correction of the acoustical response of the room and the spectrum of the target masking noise corrected by the ambient noise, in a step prior to emission of the target masking noise.
It is to be noted that according to the present invention, the contribution to the acoustical response of the room due to the loudspeakers is taken into account whatever the location of the loudspeakers in the room.
The system and method of the present invention allow generating a masking noise level and spectrum automatically adjusted to obtain a target masking noise spectrum in a room.
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of embodiments thereof, it may be modified, without departing from the nature and teachings of the subject invention as defined in the appended claims.
All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents that are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,438,526 Acoustical Design of Conventional Open Plan Offices, Institute for research I Construction, National Research Council, Canadian Acoustic, 27(3):23, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2471674 | Jun 2004 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3567863 | Morrissey | Mar 1971 | A |
3879578 | Wildi | Apr 1975 | A |
3985200 | Sepmeyer | Oct 1976 | A |
3985957 | Torn | Oct 1976 | A |
4010324 | Jarvis et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4052564 | Propst et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4052720 | McGregor et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4054751 | Calder et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4059726 | Watters et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4098370 | McGregor et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4214298 | Propst et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4319088 | Orfield | Mar 1982 | A |
4438526 | Thomalla | Mar 1984 | A |
4476572 | Horrall et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4674124 | Horrall et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682670 | Lerner et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686693 | Ritter | Aug 1987 | A |
4761921 | Nelson | Aug 1988 | A |
5131047 | Hashimoto et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5192342 | Baron et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5327496 | Russell et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5506910 | Miller et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5782551 | Capaul | Jul 1998 | A |
5889869 | Botros et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6164408 | Lamm et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188771 | Horrall | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6282296 | Konno et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290140 | Pesko et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6481173 | Roy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6594365 | Eatwell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20010021259 | Horrall | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030091199 | Horrall et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030142833 | Roy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030219133 | Horrall et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1042811 | Nov 1978 | CA |
1068140 | Dec 1979 | CA |
1154689 | Oct 1983 | CA |
2122164 | Dec 1995 | CA |
2398201 | Mar 2003 | CA |
0 376 482 | Aug 1995 | EP |
WO 0225631 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03037035 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060009969 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |