1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to code optimization. In particular, the present invention relates to code optimization through auto parallelization of zero-trip loops.
2. Description of Related Art
A basic induction variable is a variable that is only determined inside a loop, whose value is incremented or decremented by a constant value. The most common place to find the use of induction variables is in array subscripts. Induction variable substitution finds variables which form arithmetic and geometric progressions and which can be expressed as functions of the indices of enclosing loops, then replaces these variables with the expressions involving loop indices. Induction variable substitution plays a very important role in resolving data dependencies and enabling loop parallelization. Loop parallelization by a compiler attempts to parallelize loops to speed up execution. Parallelizing is to generate instructions for a parallel processing computer. For example, the code segment in the left side of the example depicted in
For the nested induction variables, the substitution can be processed recursively starting from the innermost loop. A zero-trip loop is a loop that, depending on the values of the starting value and the limit, it is possible to ‘skip’ the loop entirely. In case of zero-trip loop, the number of iterations calculated from the parameters of the loop is less than 1 and the simple substitution would cause a problem. Take the exemplary Fortran code segment in
The present invention provides a method of auto parallelization of zero-trip loops. The present invention substitutes a nested basic linear induction variable by exploiting a parallelizing compiler. For a typical loop iterating from 1 to N, in which N is the loop invariant, the present invention uses max{0,N} as the loop iterations in the case of no information being known about the value of N. For the nested induction variables, the present invention applies the induction variable substitution process to the nested loops starting from the innermost loop to the outermost one. The present invention provides for removing the max operator afterwards through a copy propagation pass of the IBM compiler. In doing so, the present invention eliminates loop dependency on the induction variable and provides an opportunity for a parallelizing compiler to parallel the outermost loop.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference to
With reference now to
In the depicted example, local area network (LAN) adapter 410, small computer system interface SCSI host bus adapter 412, and expansion bus interface 414 are connected to PCI local bus 406 by direct component connection. In contrast, audio adapter 416, graphics adapter 418, and audio/video adapter 419 are connected to PCI local bus 406 by add-in boards inserted into expansion slots. Expansion bus interface 414 provides a connection for a keyboard and mouse adapter 420, modem 422, and additional memory 424. SCSI host bus adapter 412 provides a connection for hard disk drive 426, tape drive 428, and CD-ROM drive 430. Typical PCI local bus implementations will support three or four PCI expansion slots or add-in connectors.
An operating system runs on processor 402 and is used to coordinate and provide control of various components within data processing system 400 in
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the hardware in
For example, data processing system 400, if optionally configured as a network computer, may not include SCSI host bus adapter 412, hard disk drive 426, tape drive 428, and CD-ROM 430. In that case, the computer, to be properly called a client computer, includes some type of network communication interface, such as LAN adapter 410, modem 422, or the like. As another example, data processing system 400 may be a stand-alone system configured to be bootable without relying on some type of network communication interface, whether or not data processing system 400 comprises some type of network communication interface. As a further example, data processing system 400 may be a personal digital assistant (PDA), which is configured with ROM and/or flash ROM to provide non-volatile memory for storing operating system files and/or user-generated data.
The depicted example in
The processes of the present invention are performed by processor 402 using computer implemented instructions, which may be located in a memory such as, for example, main memory 404, memory 424, or in one or more peripheral devices 426-430.
The present invention provides a method of auto parallelization of zero-trip loops. The present invention substitutes a nested basic linear induction variable by exploiting a parallelizing compiler. For a typical loop iterating from 1 to N, in which N is the loop invariant, the present invention uses max{0,N} as the loop iterations in case of no information is known about the value of N. For the nested induction variables, the present invention applies the induction variable substitution process to the nested loops starting from the innermost loop to the outermost loop. The present invention provides for removing the max operator afterwards through a copy propagation pass of the IBM compiler. In doing so, the present invention eliminates loop dependency on the induction variable and provides an opportunity for a parallelizing compiler to parallel the outermost loop.
Turning now to
If a nested basic induction variable is identified (block 504), then a nested basic induction variable substitution is performed (block 506). Using the zero-trip loop code segment of
After the nested basic induction variable substitution is performed, loop normalization is performed (block 508). The code segment in
In summary, the present invention provides a method of auto parallelization of zero-trip loops. The present invention substitutes a nested basic linear induction variable by exploiting a parallelizing compiler. For a typical loop iterating from 1 to N, in which N is the loop invariant, the present invention uses max{0,N} as the loop iterations in case of no information is known about the value of N. For the nested induction variables, the present invention applies the induction variable substitution process to the nested loops starting from the innermost loop to the outermost one. The present invention provides for removing the max operator afterwards through a copy propagation pass of the IBM compiler. In doing so, the present invention eliminates loop dependency on the induction variable and provides an opportunity for a parallelizing compiler to parallel the outermost loop.
It is important to note that while the present invention has been described in the context of a fully functioning data processing system, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the processes of the present invention are capable of being distributed in the form of a computer readable medium of instructions and a variety of forms and that the present invention applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media actually used to carry out the distribution. Examples of computer readable media include recordable-type media, such as a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a RAM, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, and transmission-type media, such as digital and analog communications links, wired or wireless communications links using transmission forms, such as, for example, radio frequency and light wave transmissions. The computer readable media may take the form of coded formats that are decoded for actual use in a particular data processing system.
The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention, the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/926,594, filed Aug. 26, 2004, status allowed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4833606 | Iwasawa et al. | May 1989 | A |
5349665 | Endo | Sep 1994 | A |
6192515 | Doshi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6253371 | Iwasawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282704 | Iitsuka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343375 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6367071 | Cao et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6588009 | Guffens et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6708325 | Cooke et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7073169 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7487497 | Ren et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
8156284 | Vorbach et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20020199177 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20060048119 | Ren et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070050603 | Vorbach et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09-319591 | Dec 1997 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Pottenger et al., “Induction Variable Substitution and Reduction Recognition in the Polaris Parallelizing Compiler”, 1995, Master of Science in Thesis in Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 1-70. |
Pottenger et al.,“Idiom Recognition in the Polaris Parallelizing Compiler”, 1995, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Supercomputing, pp. 444-448. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 23, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,594, 8 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,594, 8 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,594, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090158018 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10926594 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 12356978 | US |