The present invention relates to an auto shut off device capable of restricting gas flow under normal operating conditions and shutting off gas flow in response to a downstream catastrophic failure.
Industrial processing and manufacturing applications, such as semiconductor manufacturing, typically require the safe handling of toxic, corrosive and/or flammable hydridic and halidic gases and mixtures thereof. By way of example, the semiconductor industry often relies on the gaseous hydrides of silane (SiH4), and liquefied compressed gases such as arsine (AsH3) and phosphine (PH3) for wafer processing. Various semiconductor processes utilize SiH4, AsH3 or PH3 from vessels that have storage pressures as high as 1500 psig. As a result of their extreme toxicity and high vapor pressure, uncontrolled release of these gases, due to delivery system component failure, or human error during cylinder change-out procedures, may lead to catastrophic results. For example, the release of a flammable gas such as silane may result in a fire, system damage and/or potential for personal injury. Leaks of a highly toxic gas, such as arsine, could result in personal injury or even death.
Silane is an example of how a toxic gas is typically used by the semiconductor industry. Silane is stored as a gas phase product in pressurized containers at about 1500 psig or higher. A leak in one 140 gram cylinder of silane could contaminate the entire volume of a 30,000 square foot building with 10 foot high ceilings to the Immediate Danger to Life and Health (IDLH) level. If the leak rate were sufficiently large, contamination to the IDLH level could occur within minutes, which would mean that there would be deadly concentration levels in the area near the source of the spill over a sustained time.
In light of the safety hazards associated with the unintended release of gases and liquefied compressed gases from high pressure cylinders, several mechanical systems have been designed and developed to improve upon their storage and delivery. However, the systems remain ineffective. For example, the release rate of the toxic gases, as a result of a failure from current cylinder storage and delivery cylinders, is controlled but still sufficiently high to cause contaminant concentration levels in a production environment to reach IDLH levels. The inability for current systems to adequately reduce the release rate fails to enhance the safe handling of hydridic and halidic gases in a semiconductor production environment.
Further, there may be instances in which flow restriction is not adequate to ensure safety of the environment surrounding the area of the cylinder. Complete flow isolation may be required in the event of a catastrophic system failure of a cylinder component, such as, for example, the pressure regulators and valving associated with the gas cylinders, or the failure of a downstream gas line or connection. The inability to isolate flow of the toxic gases as a result of such failures can cause dangerous concentration levels to be released to the atmosphere.
The ability to both adequately restrict flow to safe levels and isolate flow at a predefined set point condition is desirable. Other aspects of the present invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the specification, drawings, and claims appended hereto.
The present invention utilizes an auto shut off device to isolate gas flow. The auto shut off device includes a restrictive flow orifice (RFO) disc. As will be explained, the RFO disc is designed to flex in response to a predefined pressure drop that develops across the disc as a result of increased flow of gas through the predetermined openings or holes in the disc. The increased flow of gas may occur as a result of a downstream catastrophic failure or a loss of flow control. The pressure drop causes the RFO disc to flex from an open to a closed and sealed position, which blocks the discharge flow path, thereby preventing the gas from flowing downstream beyond the disc. In this way, the RFO disc confines the gas upstream of the disc.
In a first aspect of the invention, an auto shut off device for isolating the flow of pressurized gas from a gas discharge flow path is provided, comprising a restrictive flow orifice disc, the disc sealed in place to a first elastomeric member disposed at a first location; a second elastomeric member disposed at a second location, wherein the disc and the second elastomeric member form a flow path to the gas discharge flow path when the disc is in a relaxed state; one or more openings extending through a thickness of the disc and located between the first and the second elastomeric members, wherein the gas flows through the one or more openings to the flow path, the flow path configured to direct the gas to the gas discharge flow path when the disc is in the relaxed state; wherein the disc is configured to flex from the relaxed state towards the second elastomeric member and engage therewith to seal off the gas flow discharge path in response to a predetermined pressure drop across the disc resulting from an increased flow through the orifice
In a second aspect of the invention, an auto shut off device for isolating the flow of pressurized gas from a gas discharge flow path is provided, comprising a restrictive flow orifice disc, the disc held stationary between a first elastomeric member and a second elastomeric member, a periphery of the disc sealed to the first elastomeric member to prevent the flow of gas around the periphery; a second elastomeric member disposed along a top surface of the disc, the second elastomeric member disposed radially inward of the first elastomeric member, wherein the disc and the second elastomeric member form a flow path to the gas discharge flow path when the disc is in a relaxed state; one or more openings extending through a thickness of the disc and located between the first and the second elastomeric members, wherein the gas flows through the one or more openings to the flow path, the flow path configured to direct the gas radially inward beyond the second elastomeric member to the discharge flow path when the disc is in the relaxed state; wherein the disc is configured to flex from the relaxed state towards the second elastomeric member to seal off the gas flow discharge path in response to a predetermined pressure drop across the disc.
In a third aspect of the invention, a system for isolating the flow of gas within a pressurized cylinder is provided, comprising: a cylinder for holding a pressurized gas; a gas discharge pathway defined in part by a valve body affixed to an upper part of the cylinder, said valve body containing a sealing member configured to move from an closed position whereby flow path through the valve is blocked, to an open position whereby gas is allowed to flow through the valve body; a restrictive flow orifice disc disposed upstream of the valve body sealing member, said disc affixed between a first elastomeric member and a second elastomeric member, the first elastomeric member disposed along a periphery of the disc and the second elastomeric member is disposed radially inward of the second elastomeric member and along a top surface of the disc; a flow path defined by the second elastomeric member and the top surface of the disc, the flow path configured to direct gas to a gas discharge flow path when the disc is in a relaxed state; one or more openings extending along a thickness of the disc and located between the first and the second elastomeric members, the one or more openings forming an inlet to the flow path; wherein the disc is configured to flex from the relaxed state towards the second elastomeric member so as to seal the gas discharge pathway, the seal preventing the flow of gas through the discharge pathway.
The objects and advantages of the invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof in connection with the accompanying figures wherein like numbers denote same features throughout and wherein:
The disc 101 is disposed between the first and the second elastomeric members 102 and 103, respectively. The first elastomeric member 102 is sealed to the periphery of the disc 101 at the base piece 110, thereby preventing the flow of gas beyond the periphery of the disc 101. The second elastomeric member 103 is disposed inward of the first elastomeric member 102. The second elastomeric member 103 is not sealed to the disc 101. Thus, the disc 101 can flex in an upwards direction towards the member 103, as will be explained in
Still referring to
An upper stem piece 111 mates onto the base piece 110 and onto the top portion of the disc 101. The upper stem piece 111 contains the second elastomeric member 103, which is disposed within a groove 118 of the stem piece 111. Both the base piece 110 and upper stem piece 110 contain passageways which are aligned with each other to create a gas inlet 114 and a gas discharge flow path 115 when the pieces 110 and 111 are mated.
In the case of a catastrophic failure, without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that a choked flow regime across the orifice disc 101 may develop to create the necessary force differential that causes disc 101 to flex and block gas flow. When a catastrophic failure occurs downstream of the disc 101 (e.g., a cylinder component fails or a mechanism downstream of the cylinder fails), a leak is formed downstream of the RFO device 100. The flow rate of gas higher than under normal operating conditions is created across the RFO disc 101 and eventually through the leak. Conservation of mass requires that the gas be replenished at a higher rate across the RFO disc 101. Thus, the flow rate of gas increases across the disc 101. However, the holes 130 and 131 within the RFO disc 101 limit replenishment of gas across the disc 101. A limiting flow rate condition known as a choked flow regime of the gas can eventually be developed across the disc 101, in which the flow rate no longer increases with a further decrease in the downstream pressure (P2) of the disc 101. The gas flow rate across the disc 101 attains a maximum value as dictated by the gas flow path holes 130 and 131 within the disc 101. As a result, P2 decreases relatively fast and, as a result of the choked flow regime, may not be compensated by the higher flow rate of gas. A predetermined pressure drop (P1-P2) across the disc 101 is reached causing the disc 101 to flex towards elastomeric member 103. As the disc 101 flexes or moves upwards in response to this pressure differential, it will contact and engage with the second elastomeric member 103 located on the upper stem piece 111. When the disc 101 has engaged with member 103, the disc 101 blocks the pathway 122 and the inlet 114 to gas discharge pathway 115. As a result, the gas flow stops along discharge pathway 115, as shown in
The criteria for sizing a suitable auto shut off device in accordance with the embodiment shown in
A variety of parameters can determine the flexing behavior of the disc. One parameter may include, for example, the selection of a suitable material of construction and whether such material should be heat treated. The design contemplates various materials such as, for example, nickel, chromium, stainless steel and alloys thereof. Each of the materials will require different thicknesses to flex at a predetermined gas flow rate for a particular gas having a defined pressure, P1. Examples of other parameters can include the thickness of the disc, the strength of the disc, the number and size of holes within the disc, the net effective flow area of the holes across the disc and the total active area where the pressure is applied along the surface of the disc. In one example, the hole size may range from about 1 micron to about 1000 microns, and preferably from about 10 microns to about 1000 microns. Still further, other disc parameters may include the distance the disc is required to flex between the first and second elastomeric members. The greater the distance between the first and the second elastomeric members, the more the disc will be required to flex in order to contact elastomer 103 and thereby isolate flow.
Still further, the design of a suitable disc should also take into consideration the type of gas being supplied. The type of gas to be supplied can affect the required thickness of the disc. A low inlet pressure to the disc (P1) may allow a relatively thinner disc to be employed. For example, gases such as arsine are liquefied gases, having a pressure limited by their vapor pressure. Arsine exerts a vapor pressure of approximately 200 psig at 70° F. Because such a relatively low supply pressure exerts a small amount of force (P1) at the bottom of the RFO disc, a thin disc can be used. However, gases, such as BF3 or SiH4, are filled into cylinders at pressure of 1250 psig or higher, these applications may require a thicker disc.
An optimal design of the auto shut off device will involve balancing these parameters to allow the disc to flex in response to a predetermined flow rate created across the disc during a catastrophic failure. These parameters interact with each other to determine the final design and construction of the auto shut off device. In one example, a disc with a single opening of 10 microns that is formed from un-heat treated 316 stainless steel and having a thickness of 250 microns with a diameter of 0.75 inches may be selected to be disposed between a first elastomeric member 102 and a second elastomeric member 103, as shown in
Other designs may also be utilized to achieve a predetermined flexing of the disc.
In addition to flexing, the inventive auto shut off device can also block gas flow by axial translation. In this regard,
A test was conducted to evaluate the ability of the inventive auto shut off device to isolate flow in response to a predetermined flow rate excursion. The auto shut off device utilized for the test was that shown in
The flow line upstream of the auto-shutoff device was connected to a nitrogen line maintained at a pressure of 1250 psig. The downstream side of the auto-shutoff device was connected to a manifold. The manifold included two mass flow controllers. One of the flow controllers had a flow rate range of 0-10 sccm (10 sccm MFC). The second flow controller had a flow rate range of 0-1000 sccm (1000 sccm MFC). A valve was placed upstream of each of the mass flow controllers.
The pressure upstream and downstream of the RFO disc was measured using two separate pressure transducers (PTs). Both MFCs and the PTs were connected to a data acquisition system. At the start of the test, the 10 sccm MFC was set to a target flow rate of 5 sccm. The valve upstream of the 10 sccm MFC was opened. As shown in
To simulate a downstream failure characterized by a condition of high flow, the valve upstream of the 1000 sccm MFC was opened with the flow through the 1000 sccm MFC set to about 200 sccm. The region at which the valve failure was simulated to occur is designated by the vertical arrow, shown in
A comparative test run utilizing a flow restrictor device was performed in a manner similar to that described above. A conventional RFO was utilized.
Various other design modifications for the auto shut off device are contemplated. For example,
In another design variation, the RFO device 100 can be welded in place to the housing that it is contained within, as opposed to disposing the periphery of the disc 101 adjacent to a first elastomeric member 102 that is sealed to the base piece 110, as shown in
The auto shut off device as described in the various embodiments may be disposed anywhere within a gas delivery system where an increase in flow rate may occur, potentially as a result of a catastrophic downstream failure. For example, the device can be positioned upstream of a cylinder valve seat, located either in the cylinder valve body or cylinder neck. Preferably, the device is positioned within the interior of a cylinder body and upstream of an auto-controlled flow device, such as a vacuum actuated check valve, regulator, mass flow controller or other flow control device.
The auto shut off device may also be employed in combination with various valve and regulator devices, including, for example, the vacuum actuated valve and regulator devices disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,937,895; 6,007,609; 6,045,115; 6,959,724; 7,905,247, and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/477,906, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In one embodiment, the auto shut off device may be disposed upstream of the vacuum actuated device or regulator disposed within the interior of a gas cylinder. In another embodiment, the auto shut off device may be used as an alternative for the glass capillaries disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/477,906.
While it has been shown and described what is considered to be certain embodiments of the invention, it will, of course, be understood that various modifications and changes in form or detail can readily be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is, therefore, intended that this invention not be limited to the exact form and detail herein shown and described, nor to anything less than the whole of the invention herein disclosed and hereinafter claimed.