The present embodiments relate to stereoscopic image capture, and in particular, to methods, apparatus and systems for determining an appropriate focal depth for a stereoscopic image capture device.
Stereopsis is the process by which the human brain interprets an object's depth based on the relative displacement of the object as seen from the left and right eyes. The stereoscopic effect may be artificially induced by taking first and second images of a scene from first and second laterally offset viewing positions and presenting the images separately to each of the left and right eyes. By capturing a succession of stereoscopic image pairs in time, the image pairs may be successively presented to the eyes to form a stereoscopic movie that appears to the user as having three-dimensions.
Two traditional cameras may be used to acquire each of the images of a stereoscopic image pair. A traditional camera may be properly focused using an autofocus procedure which captures a plurality of images at different focal depths. The focal depth corresponding to the highest frequency content is then used for subsequent image captures. Traditional movie cameras may use this method to autofocus during video capture. However, the capture of frames will need to be periodically delayed while the autofocus functionality is performed.
While suitable for capturing 2D images with a single traditional camera, this autofocus technique may be unsuitable for stereoscopic image capture. In particular, the technique may disrupt the video stream and may be affected by camera movement, such as by the user's hand motions.
Certain embodiments contemplate a method in an electronic device for determining a focal depth for an image sensor. They method may comprise: receiving a first image associated with a first viewpoint; receiving a second image associated with a second viewpoint; determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image; correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image; determining a plurality of disparities associated with each of the first plurality of keypoints; and determining a focal depth based upon the plurality of disparities, the position of the first viewpoint and the position of the second viewpoint.
In certain embodiments, the method may further comprise determining a second plurality of keypoints based on the second image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with keypoints from the second plurality of keypoints. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises iterating over pixels within a search range in the second image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises determining the mean square error between pixels in the first image and the second image. In some embodiments, determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image comprises determining Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints based on the first image. In some embodiments, determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image comprises sub-sampling the first image, applying a high-pass filter to the first image, calculating the power of the first image, and thresholding the first image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image occurs in realtime. In some embodiments, the electronic device comprises a mobile phone.
Certain embodiments contemplate a computer readable medium comprising instructions configured to cause a computer to perform the steps of: receiving a first image associated with a first viewpoint; receiving a second image associated with a second viewpoint; determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image; correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image; determining a plurality of disparities associated with each of the first plurality of keypoints; and determining a focal depth based upon the plurality of disparities, the position of the first viewpoint and the position of the second viewpoint.
In some embodiments, the instructions are also configured to cause the processor to determine a second plurality of keypoints based on the second image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with keypoints from the second plurality of keypoints. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises iterating over pixels within a search range in the second image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises determining the mean square error between pixels in the first image and the second image. In some embodiments, determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image comprises determining Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints based on the first image. In some embodiments, determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image comprises sub-sampling the first image, applying a high-pass filter to the first image, calculating the power of the first image, and thresholding the first image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image occurs in realtime. In some embodiments, the computer is located in a mobile phone.
Certain embodiments contemplate a system for focusing a stereoscopic capture device. The system may comprise a first image sensor configured to generate a first image associated with a first viewpoint; a second image sensor configured to generate a second image associated with a second viewpoint; a feature generation module configured to determine a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image; a keypoint correlation module configured to correlate keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image; a disparity determination module configured to determine a plurality of disparities associated with each of the first plurality of keypoints; and a depth determination module configured to determine a focal depth based upon the plurality of disparities, the position of the first viewpoint and the position of the second viewpoint.
In some embodiments, the feature generation module may be configured to determine a second plurality of keypoints based on the second image. In some embodiments, the software module configured to correlate keypoints is configured to correlate keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with keypoints from the second plurality of keypoints. In some embodiments, the software module configured to correlate keypoints is configured to iterate over pixels within a search range in the second image. In some embodiments, correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image comprises determining the mean square error between pixels in the first image and the second image.
In some embodiments, the feature generation module is configured to determine Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints based on the first image. In some embodiments, the feature generation module is configured to sub-sample the first image, apply a high-pass filter to the first image, calculate the power of the first image, and threshold the first image.
In some embodiments, the software module configured to correlate keypoints correlates keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image in realtime. In some embodiments, the stereoscopic capture device is located on a mobile phone. In some embodiments, the software module configured to determine a focal depth comprises a disparity histogram.
Certain embodiments contemplate a system for focusing a stereoscopic capture device, the system comprising: means for receiving a first image associated with a first viewpoint; means for receiving a second image associated with a second viewpoint; means for determining a first plurality of keypoints based on the first image; means for correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image; means for determining a plurality of disparities associated with each of the first plurality of keypoints; and means for determining a focal depth based upon the plurality of disparities, the position of the first viewpoint and the position of the second viewpoint.
In some embodiments the means for receiving a first image comprises a first sensor, the means for receiving a second image comprises a second sensor, the means for determining a first plurality of keypoints comprises a feature generation module, the means for correlating comprises a keypoint correlation module, the means for determining a plurality of disparities comprises a disparity determination module, and the means for determining a focal depth comprises a depth determination module. In some embodiments, the means for determining a first plurality of keypoints is configured to determine a second plurality of keypoints based on the second image. In some embodiments, the means for correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image is configured to correlate keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with keypoints from the second plurality of keypoints. In some embodiments, the means for correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image is configured to iterate over pixels within a search range in the second image. In some embodiments, the means for correlating keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image is configured to determine the mean square error between pixels in the first image and the second image. In some embodiments, the means for determining a first plurality of keypoints is configured to determine Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints based on the first image. In some embodiments, the means for determining a first plurality of keypoints is configured to sub-sample the first image, apply a high-pass filter to the first image, calculate the power of the first image, and threshold the first image. In some embodiments, the means for correlating keypoints correlates the keypoints from the first plurality of keypoints with positions in the second image in realtime. In some embodiments, the stereoscopic capture device is located on a mobile phone.
The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements.
Embodiments relate to systems and methods of determining or setting configuration data in a stereoscopic camera. In one embodiment, the configuration data relates to the proper focal length of the two lenses of the stereoscopic camera. In one embodiment, a first camera receives a first image from a scene and a second camera receives a second image of the same scene. A set of keypoints are determined from analysis of the first image. The keypoints, can be, for example, Keypoints may comprise any data structure which can be consistently replicated from a portion of an image and thereby permit unique identification of the image portion. In some embodiments, a keypoint may comprise a plurality of pixels corresponding to a portion of an image. The keypoint may be associated with a position in the image. After determining a keypoint in the first image, the system looks for a similar position in the second image. Once the similar position in the second image is identified, the system calculates the difference between the keypoints in the first image, and the corresponding position in the second image. This allows the system to determine the focal depth of the scene by knowing the disparity between the same keypoint positions in both frames, along with the positions of the stereoscopic lenses.
Present embodiments contemplate systems, apparatus, and methods to determine an appropriate focal depth for a sensor based upon at least a pair of stereoscopic images. Particularly, certain of the embodiments contemplate determining keypoints for each image, identifying correlations between the keypoints, and deriving object distances from the correlations. One skilled in the art will recognize that these embodiments may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. The stereoscopic system may be implemented on a wide range of electronic devices, including mobile wireless communication devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, desktop computers, digital cameras, digital recording devices, and the like.
Although this particular device depicts two sensors 101a and 101b one skilled in the art may readily conceive of a stereoscopic image capture device which comprises more or less than two image sensors. For example, a device with only a single sensor may operate in combination with a series of lenses or reflecting surfaces to acquire two images at the positions of sensors 101a and 101b in rapid succession. This arrangement would likewise be able to acquire a stereoscopic image pair for use with the methods described below and the single sensor could be focused accordingly. Thus, the methods and systems discussed in this application will be applicable to any system which acquires two images from a first and second viewpoint, so long as those viewpoints facilitate a stereoscopic depiction of the image scene. Thus, reference to a pair of image sensors should not be considered to exclude the possibility of a single image sensor receiving images from two viewpoints.
The memory may also be in communication with a General Processor 113. The General Processor 113 may comprise sub-processing units, or subprocessors, such as an Advanced RISC Machine (ARM), digital signal processor (DSP), or graphical processing unit (GPU). These processors may communicate with local memory 114 when handling various operations.
Certain of the present embodiments contemplate the addition of a “Focal Depth Analysis Module” 115a, 115b to the system architecture. In some embodiments, the module may take the form of a dedicated processor 115a, or a portion of a processor located on the general processor. In some embodiments the module may comprise software code 115b stored in a computer readable medium such as memory 103. Some embodiments may place portions of the module at a dedicated processor 115a and memory 115b as firmware, or as a software-hardware combination. In some embodiments, the module may reside at any location in
Certain of the present embodiments provide auto-focus functionality which takes advantage of geometric properties of stereoscopic image capture.
The center of device 301a's viewpoint passes along line 302a. Similarly, the center of device 301b's viewpoint passes along line 302b. These two centerlines intersect at the position 303. As mentioned, the object 304 appears in each of the first and second images. With regard to position 300a, however, the object 304 appears to the right of centerline 302a, by an amount 305a and to the left of centerline 302b by an amount 305b. Conversely, in position 300b, the object 304 appears to the left of centerline 302a by an amount 306a, and to the right of centerline 302b, by an amount 306b. In this manner, the relative position of the object in the z-direction is reflected by the relative displacement in each of the left and right images.
Object disparity may be defined as the difference between an object's position in the first image as compared to the object's position in the second image. Where there is no vertical disparity between the capture devices, the disparity may comprise only the lateral offset from the position in one image to the position in another. One may arbitrarily take the disparity as the difference between the left and right, or right and left images. For the purposes of this description, the disparity is defined as the position of the object in the image from sensor 301b minus the position of the object in the image from sensor 301a (with the x-direction positive as indicated in
With knowledge of the sensor positions and relative orientations one can construct a graph of the relationship between the observed disparity and an object's distance, or depth, from the camera arrangement.
An autofocus operation comprises the determination of the proper focal depth for one or both of the sensors 101a, 101b. In some embodiments, the proper focal depth may be determined by taking the mean, median, or similar statistic of object depth histogram (or the object disparity histogram in conjunction with a graph such as
While one could generate the disparity histogram 601 by determining the disparity of every pixel for every object found in each of the first and second images, this may be computationally expensive and impractical on a mobile device. Not only would the correlation of every pixel require iterating through a substantial number of pixels, but each image may comprise multiple pixels of the same value, making identification of an individual pixel and its correlation to an object in each image difficult.
In lieu of analyzing every pixel, certain of the present embodiments contemplate creating a “sparse” disparity map or “sparse” corresponding depth map of the image contents. In certain embodiments, keypoints may be determined in each of the images and the disparities between keypoints, or between keypoints and pixels, rather than between all or most of the pixels in the images, may be used to infer object depth. Since there are fewer keypoints than pixels, the consequent disparity or depth map is “sparse”. Keypoints may comprise any data structure which can be consistently replicated from a portion of an image and thereby permit unique identification of the image portion. The keypoint may be associated with a position in the image. The keypoint's unique determination permits the keypoints to be identified from similar or identical portions in a second image. In some embodiments, keypoints may comprise Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints, or keypoints of a similar feature generation module. In some embodiments, the system may reuse machine vision components preexisting in the general processor 113 or subprocessors to determine keypoints. For example, high pass filtering blocks may be reused for keypoint detection. Alternatively, software libraries for performing machine vision operations stored in memory 103 may be used to generate keypoints. In this manner, certain implementations may economically take advantage of functionality associated with other applications to generate keypoints for performing autofocus. Alternative means for determining a plurality of keypoints, such as feature generation modules employing algorithms other than SIFT, are described in greater detail below.
Disparities D may then be calculated between each keypoint position of the first image and the correlated pixel positions of the second image 705. Where keypoints have been calculated for both images, the disparities between the keypoints may be determined by subtracting the relative positions of each of the correlated keypoints. The disparities may then be organized as a disparity histogram similar to 601 of
In the embodiments implementing process 700, to improve computation efficiency, the process 700 determines the statistic (in this case, the average) of the disparities 706 rather than converting to a depth for each disparity and then determining the average of the depths. Only the depth of the single statistical value need then be determined 707 with reference to a graph similar to that of
In variations of these embodiments, the system may alternatively use information from the scene to determine the depth, rather than simply take the average of the disparities. For example, in lieu of taking the average, keypoint disparities may be weighted based upon their presence in a single object and upon lighting conditions. For example, the histograms may be enhanced by weighting each point from the histogram by the focal quality associated with a certain focus distance. In certain camera arrangements if the focal point was set to 3 meters, objects between 2 m and infinity may have good focus, objects between 1 m-2 m may have fair focus, and objects between 0.5-1 m may have bad focus. The histograms of
When capturing a stereoscopic movie, the process 700 may be applied to a single frame, i.e. a single pair of stereoscopic images. The determined focal depth may then be used by the image sensors during subsequent image captures until the camera arrangement or scene is modified so as to necessitate reassessment of the proper focus. The operation 700 therefore has the benefit that there need not be any state dependency. That is, a traditional auto-focus system would need to periodically time-out the movie capture process and capture multiple focal depths to reassess the focus. Process 700, in contrast, may be “instantaneous” in that it produces no frame delay. This facilitates seamless focus tracking. The process may further guarantee system stability, as there is no feedback (or dependency) between the current focus position and the focus position estimation. Additionally, since the focus operation may be accomplished with a single frame, the user's hand motion will be less likely to generate any blur.
As mentioned, the keypoints generated in steps 703 and 704 of process 700 may comprise any data structure which can assign an identity to a portion of the image and be consistently recognized when applied to the second image. As mentioned, in some embodiments the keypoints may comprise Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) keypoints generated from a SIFT feature generation module.
The process 800 begins 801 by receiving 802 one of the pair of raw stereoscopic images. The image may then be subsampled 803, possibly to improve the algorithm's robustness to noise and to decrease computational demands. The image may then be passed through a horizontal high pass filter 804. In some embodiments, the filter may comprise a 3×4 kernel with a response given by
The process may then calculate the power 805 of the image, i.e. by taking the square of each value. Finally, the process may threshold the values 806 to eliminate noise and low-power values. From among the remaining values which exceeded the threshold, the system will identify “maximum values”. In some embodiments the maximum values may be those image portions which exceeded the threshold, while in other embodiments the maximum values may be defined relative to their local neighbors. For example, the delta between neighboring pixels exceeding the threshold may be used to identify a maximum value. The identified maximum values represent keypoint positions which may be used for the disparity determination steps described above. The system may store these keypoint positions 807 before ending 808. By subsampling and thresholding the image in this manner the computation time required to determine pixel locations which may serve as keypoints may be reduced. As a keypoint in these embodiments comprises a pixel position, the pixel position may occasionally be referred to as a “keypoint”. However, one will readily recognize variations, wherein keypoints comprise both a position and an array of the neighboring pixel values and positions. Keypoints may also refer to frequency content of an image portion or to gradients in pixel value, rather than to pixel values or pixel positions directly. SIFT keypoints, for example, may comprise a vector indicating the pixel gradient.
Once the keypoints in the first image have been determined, it may still remain to correlate the keypoints with positions in the second image so that the disparities between image portions may be determined. A possible method for determining whether keypoints, such as the keypoints generated by the process 800 of
Search region 902 is located in the same absolute position of each of images 900a and 900b. In
In certain embodiments, keypoints may have been determined for both image 900a and image 900b, rather than simply for image 900a. When attempting to correlate keypoints between the images, the system may identify keypoints within the search region 902 in the second image 900b. If only one keypoint of image 900b is found in search region 902, this keypoint may be correlated with the keypoint 901 from the first image. Where more than one keypoint of image 900b is present in the region 902, the system may apply a correlation metric to each keypoint of image 900b in the search region 902 to determine which keypoint best corresponds with the keypoint 901 from the first image. As with metrics applied when keypoints are taken for only one image, the metric may consider pixel values neighboring the pixel positions of keypoints 901 and 901b to verify that keypoints 901 and 901b are more likely to refer to the same portion of the scene in each of images 900a and 900b. Where keypoints are created for both images, it may be necessary only to iterate between keypoints in the region 902 rather than between each pixel within the region.
In the embodiments described above, the system iterates through certain of the pixels in the search region 902 corresponding to the determined keypoint 901. The system may apply a correlation metric to each pixel in the region 902. The pixel in the region 902 having the maximum correlation with the region surrounding the position of keypoint 901 may then be correlated with the keypoint 901. The computational cost to iterate through each pixel of image 900b in the range 902 may be less than the cost to compute keypoints for all of image 900b and to then determine the correlations between each keypoint. In some embodiments, however, where only a few keypoints have been generated, the system may determine correlations between all the keypoints directly, rather than iterate between regions 902 associated with the keypoints of one image.
In certain embodiments, the correlation metric used to identify a keypoint or pixel position in image 900b corresponding to a keypoint in 900a may comprise the calculation of the mean square error for pixels surrounding a position in image 900b under consideration and the pixels surrounding the keypoint position in image 900a. That is, the mean square error of pixels neighboring keypoint 901 of the first image and the neighboring pixels for positions in search region 902 in image 900b may be used as a correlation metric. The mean square error may be calculated as:
where R is the mean squared error, Sleft comprises the pixel values in the image 900a, Sright comprises the pixel values in the image 900b, M and N comprise the horizontal and vertical offsets into the image to the region 902 for the current keypoint or pixel position of region 902 under investigation, and Δ comprises the horizontal shift applied for the current position in the search region 902 (the first parameter to Sleft and Sright is a column position/x-axis and the second a row position/y-axis). Although the mean squared error is within a 7×7 window in the above example, one may readily envision a range of window dimensions depending upon the resolution of the image and the subsampling applied. Furthermore, as sensors 101a and 101b are presumed not to have any vertical disparity in the above example, the search region 902 extends only horizontally and Δ appears only in the x-axis/column direction. More robust systems may compensate for errors in sensor positioning by increasing the height of the search region 902 and including a Δ in the vertical direction. As the image has been downsampled, sub pixel resolution may be determined using interpolation, such as polynomial interpolation, in some embodiments to facilitate more accurate determinations of the pixel in region 902 of image 900b correlated with the keypoint 901. That is, the displacement of sensor 101b relative to sensor 101a may not be an exact, integer number of pixels. Thus, particularly after sub-sampling, accurate correlation of the keypoint 901 may require including locations between pixels in the search region 902. The, position in region 902 of image 900b maximally correlated with keypoint 901 may fall between pixel positions, at an interpolated point.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the implementations disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
The steps of a method or process described in connection with the implementations disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of non-transitory storage medium known in the art. An exemplary computer-readable storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the computer-readable storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal, camera, or other device. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal, camera, or other device.
Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating various sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described with respect thereto. Such concepts may have applicability throughout the entire specification.
The previous description of the disclosed implementations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/371,979, entitled “INSTANTANEOUS AUTOFOCUS FROM STEREO IMAGES,” filed Aug. 9, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/489,231, entitled “AUTOFOCUS FOR STEREO IMAGES,” filed on May 23, 2011, which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4114171 | Altman | Sep 1978 | A |
4437745 | Hajnal | Mar 1984 | A |
4639586 | Fender et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4740780 | Brown et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4751570 | Robinson | Jun 1988 | A |
5012273 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016109 | Gaylord | May 1991 | A |
5063441 | Lipton et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5142357 | Lipton et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5194959 | Kaneko et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207000 | Chang et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231461 | Silvergate et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243413 | Gitlin et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5313542 | Castonguay | May 1994 | A |
5475617 | Castonguay | Dec 1995 | A |
5539483 | Nalwa | Jul 1996 | A |
5606627 | Kuo | Feb 1997 | A |
5614941 | Hines | Mar 1997 | A |
5640222 | Paul | Jun 1997 | A |
5642299 | Hardin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5686960 | Sussman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5721585 | Keast et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734507 | Harvey | Mar 1998 | A |
5745305 | Nalwa | Apr 1998 | A |
5793527 | Nalwa | Aug 1998 | A |
5903306 | Heckendorn et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926411 | Russell | Jul 1999 | A |
5990934 | Nalwa | Nov 1999 | A |
6111702 | Nalwa | Aug 2000 | A |
6115176 | Nalwa | Sep 2000 | A |
6128143 | Nalwa | Oct 2000 | A |
6141145 | Nalwa | Oct 2000 | A |
6144501 | Nalwa | Nov 2000 | A |
6195204 | Nalwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219090 | Nalwa | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285365 | Nalwa | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6356397 | Nalwa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6611289 | Yu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628897 | Suzuki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650774 | Szeliski | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6700711 | Nalwa | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6701081 | Dwyer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6768509 | Bradski et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775437 | Kazarinov et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798406 | Jones et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6809887 | Gao et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850279 | Scherling | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6855111 | Yokoi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861633 | Osborn | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7006123 | Yoshikawa et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7039292 | Breiholz | May 2006 | B1 |
7084904 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116351 | Yoshikawa | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7215479 | Bakin | May 2007 | B1 |
7253394 | Kang | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271803 | Ejiri et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7336299 | Kostrzewski et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7612953 | Nagai et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7710463 | Foote | May 2010 | B2 |
7805071 | Mitani | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7817354 | Wilson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7893957 | Peters et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7961398 | Tocci | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8004557 | Pan | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8098276 | Chang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115813 | Tang | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8139125 | Scherling | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8228417 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8267601 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8284263 | Oohara et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294073 | Vance et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8356035 | Baluja | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8400555 | Georgiev et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8482813 | Kawano et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8791984 | Jones et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8988564 | Webster et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9316810 | Mercado | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010028482 | Nishioka | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020070365 | Karellas | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020136150 | Mihara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030024987 | Zhu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038814 | Blume | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030214575 | Yoshikawa | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021767 | Endo et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066449 | Givon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105025 | Scherling | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040183907 | Hovanky et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040246333 | Steuart et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263611 | Cutler | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053274 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057659 | Hasegawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081629 | Hoshal | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111106 | Matsumoto et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050185711 | Pfister et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218297 | Suda et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060023074 | Cutler | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023106 | Yee et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023278 | Nishioka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060140446 | Luo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193509 | Criminisi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215054 | Liang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215903 | Nishiyama | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238441 | Benjamin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024739 | Konno | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058961 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064142 | Misawa | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085903 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070164202 | Wurz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070216796 | Lenel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242152 | Chen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263115 | Horidan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268983 | Elam | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080088702 | Linsenmaier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080117289 | Schowengerdt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080218612 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259172 | Tamaru | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266404 | Sato | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080290435 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291543 | Nomura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297612 | Yoshikawa | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316301 | Givon | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003646 | Au | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005112 | Sorek et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015812 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090051804 | Nomura et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085846 | Cho | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096994 | Smits | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153726 | Lim | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160931 | Pockett et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090268983 | Stone et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268985 | Wong et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296984 | Nijim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315808 | Ishii | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100044555 | Ohara et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045774 | Len et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100066812 | Kajihara et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100165155 | Chang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202766 | Takizawa et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100215249 | Heitz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232681 | Fujieda et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100259655 | Takayama | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265363 | Kim | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278423 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289878 | Sato | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290703 | Sim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302396 | Golub et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309286 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309333 | Smith | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001789 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007135 | Okada et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009163 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012998 | Pan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043623 | Fukuta et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090575 | Mori | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096089 | Shenhav et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096988 | Suen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110128412 | Milnes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110181588 | Barenbrug et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213664 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235899 | Tanaka | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249341 | Difrancesco et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110304764 | Shigemitsu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008148 | Pryce et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120044368 | Lin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056987 | Fedoroff | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075168 | Osterhout et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120249750 | Izzat | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249815 | Bohn et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269400 | Heyward | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281072 | Georgiev | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293607 | Bhogal et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293632 | Yukich | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120327195 | Cheng | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003140 | Keniston et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010084 | Hatano | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130070055 | Atanassov et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130141802 | Yang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130222556 | Shimada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229529 | Lablans | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250053 | Levy | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250123 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130260823 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278785 | Nomura et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286451 | Verhaegh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130335598 | Gustavsson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335600 | Gustavsson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140016832 | Kong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140085502 | Lin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104378 | Kauff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140111650 | Georgiev et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140139623 | McCain et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140152852 | Ito et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184749 | Hilliges et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192253 | Laroia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140285673 | Hundley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150049172 | Ramachandra et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150070562 | Nayar et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150125092 | Zhuo et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150177524 | Webster et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150244934 | Duparre et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253647 | Mercado | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150286033 | Osborne | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150288865 | Osborne | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150370040 | Georgiev | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371387 | Atanassov | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373252 | Georgiev | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373262 | Georgiev | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373263 | Georgiev | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373268 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373269 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373279 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160085059 | Mercado | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160127646 | Osborne | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101201459 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101581828 | Nov 2009 | CN |
0610605 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0751416 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1176812 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1383342 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1816514 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1832912 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2242252 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2354390 | Mar 2001 | GB |
2354391 | Mar 2001 | GB |
H089424 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H08125835 | May 1996 | JP |
8194274 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H08242453 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2001194114 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003304561 | Oct 2003 | JP |
3791847 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006279538 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007147457 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007323615 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008009424 | Jan 2008 | JP |
H0847001 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2010041381 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010067014 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010128820 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010524279 | Jul 2010 | JP |
WO-9321560 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO-9847291 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-2006075528 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2007129147 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008112054 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2009047681 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009086330 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2010019757 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2012136388 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012164339 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013154433 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2014012603 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014025588 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2011/047126—ISA/EPO—Oct. 26, 2011. |
Narkhede, et al., “Stereoscopic Imaging: A Real-Time, In Depth Look”, IEEE Potentials, Feb./Mar. 2004, vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 38-42. |
Hoff, et al., “Surfaces from Stereo: Integrating Feature Matching Disparity Estimation, and Contour Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, No. 2, Feb. 1989. |
Arican, et al., “Intermediate View Generation for Perceived Depth Adjustment of Sterio Video”, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, http://www.merl.com, TR2009-052, Sep. 2009. |
Han Y., et al., “Removing Illumination from Image Pair for Stereo Matching”, Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), 2012 International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 16, 2012, XP032278010, pp. 508-512. |
Krotkov E., et al., “Active vision for reliable ranging: Cooperating focus, stereo, and vergence”, International Journal of Computer Vision. vol. 11, No. 2, Oct. 1, 1993 (Oct. 1, 1993), pp. 187-203, XP055149875, ISSN: 0920-5691. DOI: 10.1007/BF01469228. |
Murphy M., et al., “Lens Drivers Focus on Performance in High-Resolution Camera Modules,” Analog Dialogue, Nov. 2006, vol. 40, pp. 1-3. |
Ricoh Imagine Change: “New RICOH THETA Model, Capturing 360-degree Images in One Shot, is on Sale Soon—Spherical Video Function, API and SDK (Beta Version)”, News Release, Oct. 28, 2014, 3 pages. |
Shuchun Y., et al., “Preprocessing for stereo vision based on LOG filter”, Proceedings of 2011 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology, Aug. 2011, XP055211077, pp. 1074-1077. |
Sun W.S., et al., “Single-Lens Camera Based on a Pyramid Prism Array to Capture Four Images,” Optical Review, 2013, vol. 20 (2), pp. 145-152. |
Hao M., et al., “Object Location Technique for Binocular Stereo Vision Based on Scale Invariant Feature Points”, SIFT, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, Jun. 2009, vol. 30, No. 6 pp. 649-653. |
Kawanishi T., et al., “Generation of High-Resolution Stereo Panoramic Images by Omnidirectional Imaging Sensor Using Hexagonal Pyramidal Mirrors”, Patiern Recognition, 1998, Proceedings, Fourteenth International Conference on Brisbane, QLD., Australia Aug. 16-20, 1998, Los Alamitos, CA, USA,IEEE Comput. Soc, US, Jan. 1, 1998 (Jan. 1, 1998), pp. 485-489, vol. 1, XP031098377, ISBN: 978-0-8186-8512-5. |
Tan K-H., et al., “Multiview Panoramic Cameras Using a Pyramid”, Omnidirectional Vision, 2002 Proceedings, Third Workshop on Jun. 2, 2002, Piscataway, NJ, USA,IEEE Jan. 1, 2002 (Jan. 1, 2002), pp. 87-93, XP010611080, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1629-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120033051 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61371979 | Aug 2010 | US | |
61489231 | May 2011 | US |