The invention relates generally to tools for preparing a hole to receive an implant or fixture, and more particularly to rotary osteotomes configured with internal irrigation.
An implant is a medical device manufactured to replace a missing biological structure, to support a damaged biological structure, or to enhance an existing biological structure. Bone implants are implants of the type placed into the bone of a patient. Bone implants may be found throughout the human skeletal system, including dental implants in a jaw bone to replace a lost or damaged tooth, joint implants to replace a damaged joint such as a hip or knee, and reinforcement implants installed to repair fractures and remediate other deficiencies, to name but a few.
In some applications, the placement location for the implant is very difficult to access. These so-called “deep reach” situations include (but are not limited to) zygomatic implants like those illustrated in
Recently, the industry has embraced the osseodensification protocols for preparing an osteotomy. This popular new protocol was pioneered by Dr. Salah Huwais, inventor of this present invention, and has been marketed as a rotary osteotome by Versah, LLC of Jackson, Michigan under the brand name Densah® bur. US Patent Publication 2017/0071704 (Mar. 16, 2017) and PCT Publication WO 2017/124079 (Jul. 20, 2017) describe various examples of the Densah® bur osteotomes and their functionality. The entire disclosures of these publications are hereby incorporated by reference and relied upon in all jurisdictions that recognize incorporation by reference.
A key element of the usage protocol for the Densah® bur osteotome is copious irrigation applied at the external end of the bur, such as by an irrigation-enabled hand piece. Please see
By modulating the position of the rotary osteotome in combination with a continuous supply of irrigation fluid, the surgeon can apply an evenly distributed, expansive pressure with piston-like effect to the inner side walls of the osteotomy. This throbbing hydraulic effect has many documented preconditioning advantages, which include: 1) gentle pre-stressing of the bone structure of the osteotomy in preparation for subsequent compacting contact, 2) haptic feedback transmitted through the rotary osteotome that allows the surgeon to tactically discern the instantaneously applied pressure prior to actual contact between the rotary osteotome and side walls, 3) enhanced hydration of the bone structure which increases bone toughness and increases bone plasticity, 4) hydraulically assisted infusion of bone fragments into the lattice structure of the surrounding bone, 5) reduced heat transfer, 6) hydrodynamic lubricity, 7) dampening or cushioning of the trauma sensed by the patient, and so forth.
However, the aforementioned “deep reach” situations complicate the external irrigation protocol of the Densah® bur osteotome. For example, it can be practically impossible to apply sufficient quantities of irrigating fluid to the flutes of a deeply embedded bur while preparing an osteotomy for a zygomatic implant like those illustrated in
There is therefore a need for improved tools and techniques that prepare bone and other types of host materials to receive an anchor or implant in “deep reach” applications.
According to a first aspect of this invention, a rotary osteotome is configured for deep reach applications. The osteotome comprises a shank that establishes a longitudinal axis of rotation. An irrigation conduit passes interiorly through the shank for transmitting a flow of liquid irrigation fluid. A body extends from the shank to an apical end. The body has a distal portion adjacent the apical end, and a proximal portion adjacent the shank. The irrigation conduit passes interiorly into the proximal portion of the body in continuity from the shank. The distal portion of the body includes a fluted tip. At least a portion of the fluted tip has a conically tapered profile that decreases from a maximum diameter adjacent the proximal portion to a minimum diameter adjacent the apical end. A plurality of flutes are disposed about the fluted tip. Each flute extends from adjacent the apical end to a respective terminus. A land is formed between each adjacent pair of the flutes. The proximal portion of the body includes a stopper section. The stopper section comprises an elongated generally straight or tapered section of the body that is spaced apart from the flutes. The irrigation conduit includes at least one outlet orifice configured to emit the liquid irrigation fluid. The outlet orifice is disposed in the stopper section and is spaced from the flutes so that the emission of liquid irrigating fluid from the outlet orifice occurs at a position that is not directly on the fluted tip.
According to a second aspect of this invention, a rotary osteotome is configured for deep reach applications. The osteotome comprises a shank that establishes a longitudinal axis of rotation. An irrigation conduit passes interiorly through the shank for transmitting a flow of liquid irrigation fluid. A body extends from the shank to an apical end. The body has a distal portion that is adjacent the apical end, and a proximal portion adjacent the shank. The irrigation conduit passes interiorly into the proximal portion of the body in continuity from the shank. The distal portion of the body includes a fluted tip. At least a portion of the fluted tip has a conically tapered profile that decreases from a maximum diameter adjacent the proximal portion to a minimum diameter adjacent the apical end. A plurality of flutes are disposed about the fluted tip. Each flute extends from adjacent the apical end to a respective terminus. Each flute helically spirals about the conically tapered profile of the fluted tip. A land is formed between each adjacent pair of flutes. The proximal portion of the body includes a stopper section. The stopper section comprises an elongated generally straight or tapered section of the body spaced apart from the flutes. The irrigation conduit includes a plurality of outlet orifices circumferentially spaced from one another about the stopper section. Each outlet orifice is configured to emit the liquid irrigation fluid at a position that is axially spaced from the flutes.
By locating the outlet orifice(s) on the stopper section, an energetic feed of irrigating fluid is enabled to flow into the flutes and toward the apical end, thus better mimicking external irrigation practices of the prior art. By flowing irrigation fluid into the flutes and toward the apical end, hydraulic effects can be generated with known preconditioning advantages, which include: 1) gentle pre-stressing of the bone structure of the osteotomy in preparation for subsequent compacting contact, 2) haptic feedback transmitted through the rotary osteotome that allows the surgeon to tactically discern the instantaneously applied pressure prior to actual contact between the rotary osteotome and side walls, 3) enhanced hydration of the bone structure which increases bone toughness and increases bone plasticity, 4) hydraulically assisted infusion of bone fragments into the lattice structure of the surrounding bone, 5) reduced heat transfer especially in areas of plastic deformation, 6) hydrodynamic lubricity, and 7) dampening or cushioning of the trauma sensed by the patient, to name a few.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
For illustrative purposes only, the externally irrigated prior art style rotary osteotome of
Turning now to
A lower portion of the body 32 preferably has conically tapered profile decreasing from a maximum diameter to a minimum diameter adjacent an apical end 38. However, in some contemplated embodiments the lower end of the body 32 may be non-tapered (i.e., cylindrical). The apical end 38 is thus remote from the shank 30. Preferably, all osteotomes 36 in a kit will have the same taper angle, or approximately the same taper angle. Taper angles between about 1° and 5° (or more) are possible depending upon the application. More preferably, taper angles between about 2°-3° will provide satisfactory results. And still more preferably, a taper angle of about 2°36′ is known to provide outstanding results for dental applications.
The apical end 38 is defined by at least one, but preferably a pair of lips 40 best seen in
Each lip 40 has a generally planar first trailing flank 44. The first trailing flanks 44 are canted from their respective lips 40 at a first angle. The first angle may be varied between about 30° and 60° to optimize performance for the application. In practice, the first angle may be approximately 45° measured relative to longitudinal axis A. It will be appreciated therefore that the two opposing first trailing flanks 44 are set in opposite directions so that when the rotary osteotome 28 is rotated in use, the first trailing flanks 44 either lead or follow their respective lips 40. When first trailing flanks 44 lead their respective lips 40, the osteotome 28 is said to be turning in a non-cutting direction for the densifying mode; and conversely when the first trailing flanks 44 follow their respective lips 40, the osteotome 28 is said to be turning in a cutting direction where the lips 40 cut or slice bone on descent. In the densifying direction, the first trailing flanks 44 form, in effect, a large negative rake angle for the lips 40 to minimize chip formation and shear deformation in the bone (or other host material) at the point of contact with the lips 40.
A generally planar second trailing flank 46 is formed adjacent to, and falls away from, each first trailing flank 44 at a second angle. The second angle is smaller than the first angle, preferably less than about 55°. In an example where the first trailing flanks 44 are formed at 45° (relative to the axis A), the second trailing flanks 46 may be 40° or less. A generally planar relief pocket 48 is formed adjacent to, and falls away from, each second trailing flank 46 at a third angle. The third angle is smaller than the second angle. In an example where the second trailing flanks 46 are formed at 40° (relative to the axis A), the relief pockets 48 (i.e., the third angle) may be 30° or less. Each relief pocket 48 is disposed in a sector of the apical end 38 between a second trailing flank 46 and a lip 40. When the rotary osteotome 28 is rotated in the cutting direction, a significant amount of bone chips collect in the relief pocket 48 regions. When the rotary osteotome 28 is rotated in the densifying direction, little to no bone chips collect in the relief pocket 48 regions.
A plurality of grooves or flutes 50 are disposed about the body 32. The flutes 50 may or may not have common axial length and radial depths. I.e., it is possible that the flutes 50 could, in some configurations, not all be identical. The flutes 50 are preferably, but not necessarily, equally circumferentially arranged about the tapered lower end of the body 32. The diameter of the body 32 may influence the number of flutes 50. As an example, bodies 42 in the range of about 1.5-2.5 mm may be formed with three or four flutes; bodies 42 in the range of about 2.0-3.0 mm may be formed with five or six flutes; bodies 42 in the range of about 3.0-4.0 mm may be formed with seven or eight flutes. And so on. Of course, the number of flutes 50 may be varied more or less than the examples given in order to optimize performance and/or to better suit the particular application.
In the illustrated embodiment, the flutes 50 are formed with a helical twist. If the cutting direction is in the right-hand (clockwise) direction, then preferably the helical spiral is also in the right-hand direction. This RHS-RHC configuration is shown throughout the Figures, although it should be appreciated that a reversal of cutting direction and helical spiral direction (i.e., to LHS-LHC) could be made if desired with substantially equal results.
Each flute 50 has a densifying face 52 and an opposing cutting face 54. A rib or land is formed between adjacent flutes 50, in alternating fashion. Thus, a four-flute 50 rotary osteotome 28 will have four lands, a six-flute 50 rotary osteotome 28 will have six interleaved lands, and so forth. Each land has an outer land face 56 that extends (circumferentially) between the densifying face 52 of the flute 50 on one side and the cutting face 54 of the flute 50 on its other side. The sharp interface between each land face 56 and its associated cutting face 54 is referred to as a working edge 58. Depending on the rotational direction of the rotary osteotome 28, the working edge 58 either functions to cut bone or compact bone. That is, when the osteotome 28 is rotated in the cutting direction, the working edges 58 slice and excavate bone (or other host material). When the osteotome 28 is rotated in the densifying (non-cutting) direction, the working edges 58 compress and radially displace bone (or other host material) with little to no cutting whatsoever. This compaction and radial displacement is exhibited as gentle pushing of the osseous structure laterally outwardly in a condensation mechanism.
The working edges 58 are shown throughout the illustrations as being substantially margin-less, in that the entire portion of each land face 56 is cut away behind the working edge 58 to provide complete clearance as can be appreciated from the in-use depiction of
The cutting face 54 establishes a rake angle for each respective working edge 58. A rake is an angle of slope measured from the leading face of the working edge 58 to an imaginary line extending perpendicular to the surface of the worked object (e.g., inner bone surface of the osteotomy). See
When the rotary osteotome 28 is counter-rotated, in the densifying mode, the effective rake angle is established between the working edge 58 and the land face 56, which may lie at a large negative rake angle in the order of about 55°-89°. The large negative rake angle of the working edge 58, when rotated in a densifying direction, applies outward pressure at the point of contact between the wall of the osteotomy 26 and the working edge 58 to create a compression wave ahead of the point of contact. Osseodensification may also be loosely compared to the well-known process of burnishing metal to improve metal surface quality.
Downward pressure applied by the surgeon is needed to keep the working edge 58 in contact with the bone surface of the osteotomy 26 being expanded. That is, pressure is needed to generate and propagate a compression wave in the bone that begins when the contact stresses exceed the yield strength of the host bone material. This is aided by the taper effect of the osteotomy 26 and tool 28 to create lateral pressure (i.e., in the intended direction of expansion). The harder the surgeon pushes the rotary osteotome 28 into the osteotomy 26, the more pressure is exerted laterally. This gives the surgeon complete control of the expansion rate irrespective to a large degree on the rotation speed of the rotary osteotome 28, which is a factor underlying the short learning curve required to master the osseodensification technique. Thus, the compaction intensity depends chiefly on the amount of force exerted on the rotary osteotome 28, which is controlled by the surgeon. The more force exerted; the quicker expansion will occur.
As each working edge 58 drags across the bone, the applied forces can be decomposed into two components: one normal to the bone's surface, pressing it outwardly, and the other tangential, dragging it along the inner surface of the osteotomy 26. As the tangential component is increased, the working edge 58 will start to slide along the bone. At the same time, the normal force will deform the softer bone material. If the normal force is low, the working edges 58 will rub against the bone but not permanently alter its surface. The rubbing action will create friction and heat, but this can be controlled by the surgeon by altering, on-the-fly, the rotation speed and/or pressure and/or irrigation flow. Because the lower portion of the body 32 is tapered, the surgeon may at any instant during the surgical procedure lift the working edges 58 away from contact with the surface of the bone to allow cooling. This can be done in a controlled “bouncing” fashion where pressure is applied in short bursts with the surgeon continuously monitoring progress and making fine corrections and adjustments. As the surgeon-applied downward force increases, eventually the stresses in the bone surface exceed its yield strength. When this happens, the working edges 58 will plow through the surface and create a trough behind. The plowing action of the working edges 58 thus progressively enlarges the osteotomy until the rotary osteotome 28 reaches full/maximum depth, at which time a different larger rotary osteotome 28 must be used to achieve further expansion if desired.
While the elastic properties of bone are well-known, if the load imposed by the surgeon does not exceed the bone's ability to deform elastically, the bone will promptly return to its initial (un-deformed) condition once the stress is removed. On the other hand, if the load imposed by the surgeon exceeds the bone's ability to deform elastically, the bone will deform and change shape permanently by plastic deformation. In bone, the permanent change in shape may be associated with micro-cracks that allow energy release, a compromise that is a natural defense against complete fracture. If these micro-cracks are small, the bone remains in one piece while the osteotomy expands. The region of plastic deformation extends from the yield point of the material, all the way to the point of fracture. The peak of the curve between yield point and fracture indicates the material's ultimate tensile strength. When a material (e.g., bone) is subjected to stress in the region between its yield point and its ultimate tensile strength, the material experiences strain hardening. Strain hardening, also known as work hardening or cold working, is the strengthening of a ductile material by plastic deformation. This strengthening occurs because of dislocation movements and dislocation generation within the crystal structure of the material-which for bone materials corresponds with the dislocation of the cross-links between collagen fibers in the bone tissue. The material tends to experience necking when subjected to stress in the region between its ultimate tensile strength and the point of fracture.
The direction of helical twist can be designed to play a role in contributing to the surgeon's control so that an optimum level of stress (in the strain hardening zone) can be applied to the bone (or other host material) throughout the expansion procedure. In particular, the RHS-RHC configuration described above, which represents a right-hand spiral for a right-hand cutting direction (or alternatively an LHS-LHC configuration, not shown) applies a stress that provokes a beneficial opposing axial reaction force (Ry) in the host bone when the rotary osteotome 28 is continuously rotated at high speed in a densifying direction and concurrently forcibly advanced (manually by the surgeon) into an osteotomy 26. This opposing axial reaction force (Ry) is illustrated graphically in
For a surgeon to advance the apical end 38 toward the bottom of the osteotomy 26 when the rotary osteotome 28 is spinning in the densifying direction, he or she must push against and overcome the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) in addition to supplying the force needed to plastically displace/expand the bone as described above. The rotary osteotome 28 is designed so that the surgeon must continually work, as it were, against the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) to expand the osteotomy 26 by compaction, i.e., when in the densifying mode. Rather than being a detriment, the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) are a benefit to the surgeon by giving them greater control over the expansion process. Because of the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry), the rotary osteotome 28 will not be pulled deeper into the osteotomy 26 as might occur with a standard “up cutting” twist drill or burr that is designed to generate a tractive force that tends to advance the osteotome toward the interior of the osseous site. Up-cutting burrs have the potential to grab and pull the burr more deeply into the osteotomy, which could lead to inadvertent over-penetration.
In the densifying mode, the intensity of the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) is always proportional to the intensity of force applied by the surgeon in advancing the body 32 into the osteotomy 26. This opposing force thus creates real-time haptic feedback that is intuitive and natural to inform the surgeon whether more or less applied force is needed at any given instant. This concurrent tactile feedback takes full advantage of the surgeon's delicate sense of touch by applying reaction forces (R, and in particular the axial component Ry) directly through the rotary osteotome 28. In this densifying mode, the mechanical stimulation of the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) assists the surgeon to better control the expansion procedure on the basis of how the bone (or other host material) is reacting to the expansion procedure in real time.
Thus, the controlled “bouncing” or “pumping” action described above is made more effective and substantially more controllable by the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) so that the surgeon can instinctively monitor progress and make fine corrections and applied pressure adjustments on-the-fly without losing control over the rate of expansion. The tactile feedback from the opposing axial reaction forces (Ry) allows a surgeon to intuitively exert stress on the bone material so that its strain response preferably resides in the strain hardening zone, that is, between its yield point to its ultimate tensile strength. In any event, the surgeon will endeavor to maintain the stress (as generated by the force he or she applies through the rotating rotary osteotome 28) above the elastic limit and below the point of fracture. Of course, until the applied stress passes the elastic limit, the bone will not permanently deform at all; and to apply stress beyond the point of fracture will cause the bone (or other host material) to break-possibly catastrophically.
Mixed with blood and collagen and irrigating fluid, the bone chips have the consistency of a semi-viscous slurry. Bone debris that is distributed up the flutes 50 works its way toward the associated land faces 56 where it is wiped and pressed into the cellular walls of the osteotomy 26 and immediately grafted back into the patient's bone very near to the sight were it was harvested. Bone debris that is carried to the bottom of the osteotomy 26 is wiped and pressed into the bottom of the osteotomy 26. As a result, an auto-grafting zone is developed around and under the compaction region. And at the osteotomy bottom, where this is little-to-no compaction at all, there is a significant zone of auto-grafting which serves to densify and positively stimulate an area of the osteotomy 26 which could otherwise not be densified. The osseodensification method thus preserves bone and its collagen content to enhance plasticity. The osseodensification method allows for enlarging an osteotomy 26 by compacting (and/or by cutting when rotation is reversed) with a rotary osteotome 28 in preparation for a subsequently placed implant or fixture.
The rotary osteotome 28 of this present invention is particularly configured for zygomatic and other deep reach applications. As such, the body 32 of the rotary osteotome 28 includes an elongated stopper section 60 that extends between the terminus 62 of the flutes 50 and the transition 36. The stopper section 60 produces a vital plugging action to prevent the continued migration of bone particles along the flutes 50 in cutting mode, and thereby self-arrest the cutting performance of the osteotome 28 when operated in the cutting direction. In practice, the axial length of the stopper section 60 can vary depending on the intended application.
In some contemplated embodiments, the entire length of the body 32, from apical end 38 to transition 36, has a continuous taper or conical profile. In these cases, the stopper section 60 will share this tapered configuration. However, in the illustrated examples the stopper section 60 has a straight cylindrical profile. Thus, only the lower end of the body 32 is tapered; a cylindrical shape occupies the stopper section 60, which is ideally suited to accommodate the shape of may zygomatic and other deep reach style implants 20, 22, 24.
In reference to
As perhaps best shown in
As stated previously, it is contemplated that the irrigation conduit is provided with at least one outlet orifice 66. And the outlet orifice 66 is preferably disposed in the stopper section 60. However, to maintain rotational balance, a plurality of outlet orifices 66 are preferred. The plural outlet orifices 66 are spaced apart from one another in equal circumferential increments about the body 32. In the illustrated examples, the osteotome 28 is provided with two outlet orifices 66 diametrically opposed to one another. However, more than two outlet orifices 66 are certainly possible, provided the circumferential spacing maintains rotational balance. Naturally, one could envision an equivalent configuration of outlet orifices 66 arranged in clusters, where the clusters are equally circumferentially spaced apart even though individual orifices 66 may be unequally spaced. The main objective is thus to maintain rotational stability and balance at speeds approaching 2000 RPM.
A flow splitter 70 is disposed between the main trunk 68 and the plurality of outlet orifices 66. The flow splitter 70 is configured to divide the flow of irrigating fluid traveling through the main trunk 68 into substantially equal branches 72 to be emitted through the respective the orifices 66. Each branch 72 is angled at an acute trajectory B relative to the longitudinal axis in the direction of the apical end, as best seen in
Each outlet orifice 66 has a generally elliptical shape defined by a longer major axis and a shorter minor axis according to the normal rules of geometry. The major axis is oriented axially, whereas the minor axis is oriented circumferentially in the illustrated examples. The elliptical shape creates a specialized nozzle effect that is particularly adapted for zygomatic and deep reach applications. In particular, the elliptical shape of each orifice 66 has the effect of naturally bending the emitted streams of water into the waiting flutes 50. Surface tension along the boundary layer of the transiting liquid causes the irrigating fluid to cling to the inside surface of the branch 72. That means water exiting each orifice 66 will be urged by this natural effect to remain in contact with the body 32 and roll into the flutes 50.
To fully exploit this law of fluid mechanics, each outlet orifice 66 can be axially aligned with the terminus 62 of a respective flute 50, as shown throughout the illustrations. This alignment of orifices 66 and flutes 50 only improves the transfer of irrigating fluid into the flutes 50 where it can be pumped toward the apical end 38. Proximity of the orifice 66 to its associated flute terminus 62 naturally plays a role. In practice, it has been found that the distance from an orifice 66 to an adjacent flute terminus 62 should be no more than three lengths, regardless of alignment condition. That is to say, there should be no more than three times (3×) the major diameter of the elliptical shape in space between orifice and terminus 62 even if they are not axially aligned. Closer is generally considered better in this instance, such that a spacing less than a length (i.e., major diameter of orifice 66) coupled with axial alignment is considered optimal in many applications.
In practice, many zygomatic and other deep reach applications call for particularly narrow (slim) implants 20, 22, 24. That means the diameters of the rotary osteotomes 28 are likewise narrow/slim. The aforementioned hydraulic pumping effect that is enhanced by the flutes 50 is somewhat muted or frustrated when the diameter of the rotary osteotome 28 is narrow. (Larger diameters naturally generate larger angular velocities.) Therefore, even minor improvements in efficiency are welcomed.
The pilot drill 74 can be of any suitable type. The version shown in
Methods of use have been well-documented, at least in the context of externally irrigated osteotomes. Detailed descriptions for methods of use may be had, for example, in WO 2017/124079 A1 published 20 Jul. 2017. In jurisdictions that permit incorporation by reference, the entire disclosure of WO 2017/124079 A1 is hereby incorporated by reference.
The principles of this invention are not limited to bone as the host material. Indeed, the osteotome 28 of this invention may be configured to enlarge a hole in almost any type of cellular or solid material by cutting and/or compacting. (In non-medical applications, the rotary osteotome 28 should be identified as simply a tool or rotary tool to avoid confusion with the osteo-prefix which implies use in bone.) Metal foam of the type used in aerospace, heat shielding and other critical applications is a viable host material candidate. The hole formed by the rotary tool 28 of this invention is better prepared to receive a screw or other fixation anchor because its inner sidewall has been densified by the aforementioned compressive displacement and auto-grafting effects. In addition to foam metals, any inorganic materials that have visco-elastic properties similar to live bone are especially good candidates. Some experimentation has been made as well with hole formation in non-cellular inorganic materials like plate aluminum and plastic. Certain benefits have presented as well in these non-cellular materials, such that the potential to improve screw or anchor retention by hole preparation using the principles of this invention are fully contemplated.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the osteotome 28 could be configured with a fully straight or non-tapered body 32 rather than the partially tapered working end as shown in the illustrations. Accordingly, the described osteotomy enlargement techniques can be accomplished using non-tapered tools via the novel method of compacting in combination with hydrodynamic effects. Thus, the foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 17/285,011 filed on Apr. 13, 2021, which is a National Phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US19/59964 filed on Nov. 6, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/756,406 filed on Nov. 6, 2018, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference and relied upon.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62756406 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17285011 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 19011844 | US |