Embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism described herein generally relate to an autoharp string damping mechanism in which the dampers are located under the strings. The Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism is designed to be simple, robust, easily manufactured, and compact.
The autoharp consists of a fretless zither with an attached chording mechanism that facilitates playing both chords and melodies. The conventional chording mechanism was first described in the late 19th century by H. J. Haddon's disclosure of K. A. Gütter's invention, Great Britain Patent No. 8,888 (Haddan, 1884). It consists of an assembly of parallel bars mounted perpendicular to the strings that are lined with felt and held above the strings by springs (i.e. “chord bars”). Notches are cut in the felt so that when the bar is engaged some strings are damped by the felt and only those strings tuned to notes of a chord are allowed to ring freely. When no chord bars are engaged, all of the strings are allowed to ring freely. Certain limitations of this type of design are illustrated by several patents, including U.S. Pat. No. 390,830 (Wigand, 1888), U.S. Pat. No. 625,996 (Young, 1899), Great Britain Patent No. 22,417 (Page, 1915), France Patent No. 7,621,691 (Henner, 1976), U.S. Pat. No. 4,175,466 (Aronis, 1979), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,506,583 (Newton, 1985).
For non-limiting example, the length of the shortest string and the width of the chord bars limits the number of chords available to the player, usually to less than 21 chords in order to leave an unobstructed length of string on which to play. One known solution to this problem is to use a mechanism for each bar that damps all the strings tuned to a single note and its octaves. When engaged, the bar releases the strings of a single note and its octaves so that they can ring freely when plucked or strummed. Chords can then be played by engaging several bars at the same time. Certain limited advantages of mechanisms of this type include:
Such known piano key mechanisms fall into two categories. The first known piano key category consists of mechanisms that raise the dampers off of the strings when pressing down on a key, as shown in Wigand, Young, Page, and Henner. Each of these piano key mechanisms has a distinct disadvantage, for non-limiting example that they require complex linkage systems in order to convert a downward key press into an upward motion of the dampers. This makes them difficult to produce and assemble, which translates into high cost. A complex linkage system as required by the type of mechanism that raises the dampers off of the strings when pressing down on a key also adds weight to the autoharp and mechanical noise to the sound.
The second known piano key category consists of mechanisms in which the dampers are located under the strings, so that the downward motion of a key acts directly to move the dampers down, thereby allowing the strings to ring freely, as shown in Aronis and Newton. Newton's design includes metal brackets that extend from the bar above the strings to below the strings. The portion of the bracket below the string holds the damping material, so that springs that push the bar upwards hold the damping material against the string. There is one bracket on the bar for each string tuned to that note. A non-limiting exemplary disadvantage of Newton's mechanism is that it is difficult to adjust the multiple brackets so that all strings of a note are identically and adequately damped. The brackets of Newton's mechanism are typically made by bending strips of sheet metal, so that small differences in bracket dimensions can result in poor damping for some strings. In addition, string diameters are different so that the brackets may need to drop down below the bars by different amounts. Furthermore, since the brackets are flexible and normally under tension, the brackets need periodic adjustments to maintain effective damping of the strings.
Aronis also teaches a mechanism in which the dampers are located under the strings, as mentioned previously. The Aronis design has piano-like keys for activating the mechanism on the bass-string side of the autoharp body. The damping brackets pivot around adjustable mounting elements on the treble-string side of the autoharp body. As a result, the damping bracket subtends a very small arc about the adjustable mounting element, so that the distance that the damping pad on the treble side travels away from the string nearest the treble side is very small. In order to ensure that the damping pad travels sufficiently far away from the string nearest the treble-string side, the adjustable mounting element must be as far in the direction of the treble-string side as possible. This is so that the strings won't rattle against the damping pads when they vibrate. As a result, this design causes the resulting autoharp to be very wide, and under vigorous use, may still result in the strings rattling against the damping pads.
While it is known to damp autoharp strings from beneath, no method exists for simply and reliably damping autoharp strings from beneath while preserving a compact instrument with good and even damping. Accordingly, there is an unmet need for a simple, robust, easily manufactured and compact autoharp keyboard mechanism.
Embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism described herein relate to a new design for the class of autoharp mechanisms that implement buttons in the form of piano keys. Embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism described herein further relate to the category of autoharp mechanisms in which the dampers are located under the strings, so that the downward motion of a key acts directly to move the dampers down, thereby allowing the strings to ring freely.
For non-limiting example, an advantage of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism design is its simplicity, leading to ease of manufacture and assembly. For further non-limiting example, another advantage of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism design is the ability to make fine adjustments using spacers to ensure that the damping brackets apply sufficient and equal force to the damping material for each string, with no periodic adjustments required to maintain good and even damping. Embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism can be used in combination with conventional chord bars to prevent certain strings from ringing until the chord bar above it is engaged, a function normally performed by what are known as “lock bars”.
According to one embodiment of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism, the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism is engaged with an autoharp having strings. Octave bars having piano-like keys are slidingly engaged with pins extending from the top surface of the autoharp and are located above the strings. Damping brackets are also slidingly engaged with the pins and are located beneath the octave bars and beneath the strings. Coil springs are arranged around each of pins and are located beneath the octave bars and the damping brackets. Adjustable length spacers are engaged with the octave bars and with the damping brackets, one at each end of the octave bars and damping brackets. The adjustable length spacers are located between the octave bars and the damping brackets.
According to another embodiment of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism, a conversion kit is configured to be engaged with an autoharp having strings. Octave bars having piano-like keys are configured to be slidingly engaged with pins that are configured to extend from the top surface of the autoharp. The octave bars are configured to be located above the strings. Damping brackets are configured to slidingly engage with the pins beneath the octave bars and beneath the strings. Coil springs are configured to be arranged around each of the pins beneath the octave bars and damping brackets. Adjustable length spacers are configured to be engaged with the octave bars and with the damping brackets at each end of the octave bars and damping brackets. The adjustable length spacers are further configured to be located between the octave bars and the damping brackets.
According to yet another embodiment of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism, a method of manufacturing the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism Includes several steps. The first step is providing octave bars having piano-like keys. The second step is providing pins extending from the top surface of the autoharp. The third step is slidingly engaging the octave bars with the pins above the strings. The fourth step is slidingly engaging damping brackets with the pins beneath the octave bars and beneath the strings. The fifth step is arranging coil springs around each of the pins beneath the octave bars and damping brackets. The sixth step is engaging adjustable length spacers with the octave bars and with the damping brackets between the octave bars and the damping brackets, the adjustable length spacers being located at each end of the octave bars and damping brackets.
The above-mentioned and other features of embodiments of the present Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism, and the manner of their working, will become more apparent and will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference numbers indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate embodiments of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the claims in any manner.
The following detailed description and appended drawing describe and illustrate various exemplary embodiments of the invention. The description and drawings serve to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner. In respect of any methods disclosed and illustrated, the steps presented are exemplary in nature, and thus, the order of the steps is not necessary or critical.
Turning now to
The Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism 210 according to the present disclosure also includes damping brackets 241, each having a hole and slot at each end. The damping bracket 241 is provided with damping material 224 located underneath the strings 250, 251, and 252 that need to be damped by the damping bracket 241. The damping bracket 241 is placed on the pins 235 over the coil springs 237 and under the strings 250, 251, and 252. The octave bar 231 is also placed on the pins 235 over the strings 250, 251, and 252, and is provided with an adjustable length spacer 245 at each end. The adjustable length spacers 245 have two functions. First, the adjustable length spacers 245 prevent the octave bar 231 from contacting the strings 250, 251, and 252 when the piano-like key 232 is depressed. Second, the adjustable length spacers 245 push the damping brackets 241 down to separate the damping material 224 from the strings 250, 251, and 252 so that the strings 250, 251, and 252 can ring freely.
A preferred embodiment for these adjustable length spacers 245 is a threaded member, such as small wood screws engaged with the octave bars 231. Other embodiments are possible, such as appropriately interference fitted screws and threaded inserts engaged with the octave bars 231. In order to minimize mechanical noise, soft pads 246 may be placed where the adjustable length spacers 245 contact the damping brackets 241. Similarly, soft pads 247 may be placed to prevent direct contact between the damping brackets 241 and the top of the autoharp box 212. These pads may be attached to the adjustable length spacers 245, to the damping brackets 241, and/or to the autoharp box 212.
In the embodiment of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism 210 shown in
It will be appreciated that a comparison of
In comparison,
Another non-limiting example of an advantage of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism 210 according to the present disclosure is that it makes it possible to swap the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism 210 around so that the piano keys are accessed from the treble-string side of the autoharp box 212 instead of the bass-string side, which may be necessary for playing while holding it on one's shoulder. Attempting to do this with the autoharp damping mechanism of Aronis would require the distance between the outside string and the bracket pivot point to increase significantly, thereby increasing the width of the autoharp even more. Bass strings have larger vibration amplitudes than treble strings and are also a larger diameter, such that they require more clearance. In comparison the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism 210 according to the present disclosure allows the autoharp to fit into a standard sized case so that a custom case is not required, which would add to the cost.
While the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism has been described with respect to at least one embodiment, the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure, as demonstrated previously. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the Autoharp Keyboard Mechanism using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which the disclosure pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/212,241, filed Jun. 18, 2021, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63212241 | Jun 2021 | US |