The present disclosure relates to nondestructive component inspection and, more particularly, to automated analysis of thermally-sensitive coating.
Mechanical components, especially for gas turbines, may be exposed to high temperatures during design or during operation. These components may be coated with a thermally-sensitive coating to indicate maximum temperature exposure, integrated time-temperature exposure, and the like. In some cases, the thermally-sensitive coating permanently changes color (an oxidation reaction) depending on duration and exposure temperature. Interpretation of the color change is often performed manually which may be tedious, time consuming, imprecise, and error prone.
A method for thermally-sensitive coating analysis of a component, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes performing one or more scans of a thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component to generate image data; estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) for one or more pixels of one or more dark field images and one or more corresponding pixels of one or more bright field images; constructing a 2D temperature map for one or more pixels of the scanned image using the parameters from the non-uniformity correction; and mapping the 2D temperature map to a 3D computer aided design (CAD) model.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes scanning over one or more of a range of distinct frequencies as selected by a narrowband variable filter, a distinct range of polarizations, and a distinct range of incident angles.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes defining a cost function and minimizing the error between the 3D coordinates by back-projecting features from the 2D temperature map.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes using a non-linear least squares method.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes defining intensities of one or more pixels of a dark field as null and defining intensities of corresponding one or more pixels of a bright field to a nominal intensity.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes detecting bad pixels.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes determining if a value or difference from a dark value to a bright value (slope) is greater than a threshold.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes determining if a ratio from a bright value to a dark value (slope) is greater than a threshold.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of the scans, dark field images, and bright field images are filtered by one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that a dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the dark field values.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that a bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the bright field values.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of a dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the filtered dark field values, and a bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the filtered bright field values.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of a number of scans, number of dark field images, and number of bright field images is determined by the convergence of estimates for the mean, and a standard deviation as the number of scans increases.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the estimates converge when additional scans change the estimate by less than a pre-defined amount.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the pre-defined amount is 1%.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes finding a correspondence between a feature of the 2D temperature map and a feature of the 3D model; recovering extrinsic parameters via optimization using the correspondence; transforming the 2D temperature map to derive positioning and orientation; and projecting the 2D temperature map with respect to the extrinsic parameters.
A thermally-sensitive coating analysis system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes one or more of a narrowband multispectral filter, a polarization filter, an incident angle variation for the multispectral camera; and a control system operable to map a 2D temperature map from the multispectral camera to a 3D CAD model using image analytics in which repeated scans by the multispectral camera are filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes one or more repeated scans of a dark field image, a bright field image, a test coupon, and the component.
A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the filtering comprises one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.
The foregoing features and elements may be combined in various combinations without exclusivity, unless expressly indicated otherwise. These features and elements as well as the operation thereof will become more apparent in light of the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood; however, the following description and drawings are intended to be exemplary in nature and non-limiting.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
With reference to
The control system 250 may include at least one processor 252, a memory 254, and an input/output (I/O) subsystem 256. The control system 250 may be embodied as any type of computing device, a workstation, a server, an enterprise computer system, a network of computers, a combination of computers and other electronic devices, or other electronic devices. The processor 252 and the I/O subsystem 256 are communicatively coupled to the memory 254. The memory 254 may be embodied as any type of computer memory device (e.g., various forms of random access or sequential access memory, permanent or transitory). The I/O subsystem 256 may also be communicatively coupled to a number of hardware, firmware, and/or software components, including a data storage device 254, a display 260, and a user interface (UI) subsystem 262. The data storage device 254 may include one or more hard drives or other suitable persistent storage devices. A database 270 may reside at least temporarily in the data storage device 254 and/or other data storage devices (e.g., data storage devices that are “in the cloud” or otherwise connected to the control system 250 by a network).
The control system 250 may also include other hardware, firmware, and/or software components that are configured to perform the functions disclosed herein, including a driver 280 for a camera controller 284, a driver 282 for a filter controller 286, a non-uniformity correction (NUC) and scan graphical user interface (GUI) 290, and an analysis and temperature map graphical user interface (GUI) 292. The control system 250 may include other computing devices (e.g., servers, mobile computing devices, etc.) and computer aided manufacturer (CAM) systems which may be in communication with each other and/or the control system 250 via a communication network to perform one or more of the disclosed functions.
With reference to
The non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310 of the method 300, which may be performed once for a given camera/illumination/site setting includes utilizing 3-dimensional arrays in which the data is generated from scans of a “dark field” and scans of a “bright field” (step 312). The thermally-sensitive coating analysis system 200 computes coefficients for the non-uniformity correction (NUC) (step 314) and detects bad pixels to eliminate potentially spurious data or otherwise.
The non-uniformity correction (NUC) may be defined in the form:
Corrected intensity=original intensity*slope−shift (1)
where slope and shift are parameters of the transformation. All variables in equation (1) are 3-dimensional fields: (x, y, frequency band), where x and y are the individual pixel coordinates. In this embodiment, two images (or sets of images) are acquired for estimation: a dark field and a bright field, taken at the same conditions (including illumination, exposure time, aperture, and focus). The targets of the camera are backgrounds of two standard intensities). The bright field may be a uniformly reflective surface, sometimes called a gray field or a white field, where the reflectivity does not cause pixel intensities to saturate. In this example, intensities of all pixels of the dark field should be null, and of the bright field should be equal to some fixed number referred to as nominal intensity. The dark field may be a black image (e.g., taken at no light and using a black colored planar background target). In some embodiments, the pixel values of the dark field scan and bright field scan vary such that equation (1) is defined so that corrected intensities of the scans are uniformly equal to 0 and nominal intensity respectively. In alternative non-limiting embodiments, the variables in equation (1) may be a 3-dimensional field (x, y, polarization); a 3-dimensional field (x, y, incident angle); a 4-dimensional field comprising (x, y and any two of frequency band, polarization, and incident angle); a 5 dimensional field (x, y, frequency band, polarization, incident angle); and the like. Incident angle is the angle between the normal vector of the component at a pixel location and the vector to the camera center. In these embodiments the images are acquired over the range(s) of the variable(s). The computation of the NUC, construction of the temperature map, and component temperature mapping are performed analogously to the 3-dimensional (x, y, frequency band) case as described elsewhere herein. When more than one image (scan) is taken of a dark field, bright field, coupon, or component, the scans may be reduced to a single scan by filtering using a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, inpainting, and the like.
To compute the slope and shift parameters for the (x, y, frequency band) case, the two 3-dimensional arrays, scans of the dark field and scans of the bright field are utilized. The digital signal processing corrects optics and illumination irregularities via repeated scan of the dark field image, the bright field image, and test coupons. At some pixels (x, y, frequency band) the values of the dark field or bright field may be the result of noise or some defect of the optical system. Such pixels are detected and marked as bad pixels. A pixel may be identified as bad if either the value or ratio from dark field value to the bright field value (slope) is greater or less than a threshold. In one example, the dark value threshold may be derived as the mean+3σ of all the dark field values after filtering multiple scans while the bright value threshold may be derived as the mean−3σ of all the bright field values after filtering multiple scans. The ratio threshold may be derived as the mean±3σ of all the slope values after filtering multiple scans. The number of scans may be determined by the convergence of estimates for the mean and standard deviation of pixel values as the number of scans increases. In one non-limiting embodiment, one scan may be sufficient. In other non-limiting embodiments multiple scans may be beneficial to obtain consistent data from ever-changing camera, illumination settings, and electrical noise. The estimates converge when additional scans change the estimate by less than a pre-defined amount, for example about 1%. The scanning may be repeated automatically until convergence is achieved or a predetermined number of iterations have been completed. For all pixels not denoted as bad, a non-uniformity correction (NUC) is computed as in eq. (1). The repeated scans may be filtered, for example, by averaging or with a low pass filter (over space and/or over repeat scans). The data from pixels denoted as bad will not be used in subsequent computation, but may be in-painted, e.g., by deep learning techniques, low-rank approximation, interpolation, and the like.
Next, the constructing of the spectral data-to-temperature mapping 320 of the method 300 is performed. Once the slope and shift parameters are computed, coupons “C” coated with the thermally-sensitive coating 30 and baked at particular known temperatures and durations are scanned (Step 322;
Next, bad pixels are removed (step 324) from coupon scans and the remaining pixel values on a coupon scan are recomputed using the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310, accordingly to the formula (1) described elsewhere herein. These pixel values are stored and used for temperature mapping process described elsewhere herein.
The multispectral camera 220 is then utilized to image the thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component 20 (step 332) over a range of substantially distinct frequencies (colors) as filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter 230. The imaging (scans) of component 20 may be performed repeatedly and filtered as described elsewhere herein for other imaging. The imaging may be over frequency, polarization, incident angle, and the like. The 2D image data may be saved to the database 270 for further processing.
Next, bad pixels are removed (step 334) from the component scan (or filtered scan) and the remaining pixel values are recomputed using the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310, accordingly to the formula (1) described elsewhere herein.
Next, the 2D temperature map 400 (
In an alternate embodiment, the temperature mapping may be performed by a Maximal Likelihood method. In this method, coupon data are used to estimate multi-dimensional probability densities Pt(d) for the distribution of spectral vectors for all temperatures t for which coupons are available. In one embodiment the probability density can be estimated using Gaussian families of distributions. Then, for each pixel x of the component, intensities at different spectral bands are arranged in the spectral vector d(x) and the temperature t(x) is computed which yields the maximum Pt(d(x)) over all temperatures t.
In yet another embodiment other standard statistical estimation methods such as Bayesian estimation method can be utilized.
After assignment of the temperature to all pixels of a component scan, or filtered component scans, other than bad pixels, the temperature at the locations of bad pixels is assigned by application of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, inpainting, and the like) to the temperatures of all the “not bad” pixels in neighborhood of each bad pixel.
The pixel-by-pixel temperature estimation disclosed elsewhere herein may be further improved by methods reflecting the physics of heat conduction. In particular, the temperature of adjacent pixels cannot vary arbitrarily, but must depend on the thermal conductivity of the relevant materials and the component's construction. In one non-limiting embodiment, the temperature map constructed as disclosed elsewhere herein may be improved using Total Variation regularization, by solving the following optimization problem
where t(x) is the temperature map estimated on a pixel-by-pixel basis by the methods described elsewhere herein, T(x) is updated temperature map, μ is the positive parameter to be chosen on the basis of experiments, individually for each analysis system 200 and/or component 20.
Next, the 3D temperature map is constructed for each component 20 via process 330 of the method 300 is performed. The multispectral camera 220 is then utilized to image the thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component 20 (step 332) over a range of substantially distinct frequencies (colors) as filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter 230. The imaging (scans) of component 20 may be performed repeatedly and filtered as described elsewhere herein for other imaging. The imaging may be over frequency, polarization, incident angle, and the like. The 2D image data may be saved to the database 270 for further processing.
Next, bad pixels are removed (step 334) via the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310.
Next, the spectral data-to-temperature mapping from procedure 320 is applied (step 336) to obtain the 2D temperature map 400 (
Next, the 2D temperature map 400 data is mapped to a 3D CAD model 500 (
The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed by deriving a transformation that transforms the 3D CAD model 500 vertices to 2D pixel coordinates. For example, the transformation can be formulated as a 3×4 matrix containing 11 independent parameters when 2D image pixels and 3D model vertices are represented in homogeneous coordinates. These parameters define relative translation, rotation, stretching, squeezing, shearing, and a 3D-to-2D projection. A minimum of 6 pairs of 3D vertices and 2D pixel coordinates are identified to be corresponding to each other from the image and the 3D model. The identification can be either manual, semi-automatic, or fully automatic. The coordinates of these pixels and vertices can be used first to solve a linear regression problem to get an initial estimate of the 11 parameters. This initial estimate can then be used as starting point to solve a non-linear regression problem using an algorithm such as Gauss-Newton or Levenberg-Marquardt. As a result, the refined values of the 11 parameters can be used to transform the 3D CAD model 500 to match closely with 2D pixels. The 3D CAD model 500 vertices can obtain temperature values from those of their projected coordinates. This mapping uses forward projection, by projecting 3D CAD model 500 vertices to 2D temperature image coordinates.
The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed, in another embodiment, using backward projection. First the 3D vertices are triangulated to form 3D planar triangular surfaces. Then camera center coordinates are calculated from the transformation matrix. Next every image pixel is back-projected though finding an intersection between the line connecting the pixel and the camera center with a 3D planar triangular surface patch. In this way, not only the 3D model vertices obtain temperature values, but also the triangular surface patches, increasing the resolution of the 3D model in terms of temperature mapping. The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed, in yet another embodiment, by combining the above two methods.
In another embodiment, a Bayesian color-to-temperature method may be utilized. Here, the parameters of the distribution of color intensity versus temperature and wavelength are determined from calibration coupons. The conditional distributions of intensity given temperature are known for all wavelengths and assumed independent. Bayes' theorem is used to update the posterior probability of temperature given intensity in the image on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
With reference to
The method 300 corrects many of the deficiencies and inaccuracies of existing thermally-sensitive coating image processing techniques by using information about features of the actual scanned component, in the form of a computer model, as well as enhancing the accuracy of the temperature measurements and the estimation process. The automated multispectral inspection system provides detection and quantification of temperature exposure or time-temperature exposure and the automated mapping of that exposure to a 3D CAD model 500 of the component. The method 300 provides a signal to noise improvement by automatically taking multiple scans of the component; a dynamic range improvement from both the camera hardware and signal processing; an accuracy improvement by use of an optimal estimator, and an accuracy and convenience improvement of automated mapping to a 3D CAD model 500 using image analytics.
The use of the terms “a”, “an”, “the”, and similar references in the context of description (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or specifically contradicted by context. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other. It should be appreciated that relative positional terms such as “forward”, “aft”, “upper”, “lower”, “above”, “below”, and the like are with reference to normal operational attitude and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
Although the different non-limiting embodiments have specific illustrated components, the embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from any of the non-limiting embodiments in combination with features or components from any of the other non-limiting embodiments.
It should be appreciated that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be appreciated that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason, the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3804397 | Neumann | Apr 1974 | A |
4402053 | Kelley et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4403294 | Hamada et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4873651 | Raviv | Oct 1989 | A |
5064291 | Reiser | Nov 1991 | A |
5119678 | Bashyam et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5345514 | Mandavieh et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5345515 | Nishi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351078 | Lemelson | Sep 1994 | A |
5963328 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6023637 | Liu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6153889 | Jones | Nov 2000 | A |
6177682 | Bartulovic et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6271520 | Tao et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6399948 | Thomas | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434267 | Smith | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6462813 | Haven et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6690016 | Watkins et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6737648 | Fedder et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6759659 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6804622 | Bunker et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6907358 | Suh et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6965120 | Beyerer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7026811 | Roney, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7064330 | Raulerson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7119338 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122801 | Favro et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129492 | Saito et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164146 | Weir et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190162 | Tenley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220966 | Saito et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233867 | Pisupati et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240556 | Georgeson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272529 | Hogan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7313961 | Tenley et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7415882 | Fetzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7446886 | Aufmuth et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7489811 | Brummel et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7602963 | Nightingale et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7689030 | Suh et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724925 | Shepard | May 2010 | B2 |
7738725 | Raskar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7823451 | Sarr | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7966883 | Lorraine et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8050491 | Vaidyanathan | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8204294 | Alloo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208711 | Venkatachalam et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221825 | Reitz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239424 | Haigh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8413917 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449176 | Shepard | May 2013 | B2 |
8520931 | Tateno | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528317 | Gerez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8692887 | Ringermacher et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8744166 | Scheid et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761490 | Scheid et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8781209 | Scheid et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781210 | Scheid et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792705 | Scheid et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8913825 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8983794 | Motzer et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9037381 | Care | May 2015 | B2 |
9046497 | Kush et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066028 | Koshti | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9080453 | Shepard et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9116071 | Hatcher, Jr. et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9134280 | Cataldo et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9146205 | Renshaw et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9151698 | Jahnke et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9154743 | Hatcher, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9240049 | Ciurea et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251582 | Lim et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9300865 | Wang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9305345 | Lim et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9458735 | Diwinsky et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9465385 | Kamioka et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9467628 | Geng et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9471057 | Scheid et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476798 | Pandey et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476842 | Drescher et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483820 | Lim et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9488592 | Maresca et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9519844 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9594059 | Brady et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9734568 | Vajaria et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9785919 | Diwinsky et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9804997 | Sharp et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9808933 | Lin et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9981382 | Strauss et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10438036 | Reome et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
20020121602 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020167660 | Zaslavsky | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030117395 | Yoon | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030205671 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040089811 | Lewis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040089812 | Favro et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040139805 | Antonelli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040201672 | Varadarajan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240600 | Freyer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040245469 | Favro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247170 | Furze et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008215 | Shepard | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050113060 | Lowery | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151083 | Favro et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167596 | Rothenfusser et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050276907 | Harris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012790 | Furze et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060078193 | Brummel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086912 | Weir et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070007733 | Hogarth et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070017297 | Georgeson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045544 | Favro et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080022775 | Sathish et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053234 | Staroselsky et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075484 | Komiya | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080111074 | Weir et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080183402 | Malkin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080229834 | Bossi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247635 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247636 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000382 | Sathish et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010507 | Geng | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090066939 | Venkatachalam et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128643 | Kondo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090252987 | Greene, Jr. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279772 | Sun et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312956 | Zombo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100124369 | Wu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100212430 | Murai et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220910 | Kaucic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110062339 | Ruhge et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083705 | Stone et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119020 | Key | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123093 | Alloo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110299752 | Sun | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302694 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120154599 | Huang | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120188380 | Drescher et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120249959 | You et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120275667 | Lu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293647 | Singh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130028478 | St-Pierre et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041614 | Shepard et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070897 | Jacotin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130113914 | Scheid et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113916 | Scheid et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130163849 | Jahnke et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130235897 | Bouteyre et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250067 | Laxhuber et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140022357 | Yu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140056507 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098836 | Bird | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140184786 | Georgeson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140185912 | Lim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198185 | Haugen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200832 | Troy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140350338 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150041654 | Barychev et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046098 | Jack et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150086083 | Chaudhry et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150128709 | Stewart et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138342 | Brdar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150185128 | Chang et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150233714 | Kim | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253266 | Lucon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150314901 | Murray et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371431 | Korb | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160043008 | Murray et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160109283 | Broussais-Colella et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160178532 | Lim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160241793 | Ravirala et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160284098 | Okumura et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160314571 | Finn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328835 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334284 | Kaplun Mucharrafille et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170011503 | Newman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170023505 | Maione et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170052152 | Tat et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170085760 | Ernst et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170090458 | Lim et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170122123 | Kell et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170142302 | Shaw et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170184469 | Chang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184549 | Reed et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184650 | Chang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170211408 | Ahmadian et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219815 | Letter et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170221274 | Chen et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170234837 | Hall et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241286 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170258391 | Finn et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262965 | Xiong et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262977 | Finn et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262979 | Xiong et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262985 | Finn et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262986 | Xiong et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270651 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170284971 | Hall | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170297095 | Zalameda et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180002039 | Finn et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005362 | Wang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013959 | Slavens et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180019097 | Harada et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180098000 | Park et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180111239 | Zak et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190299542 | Webb | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190338666 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190339165 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190339206 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190339207 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190339234 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190339235 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190340721 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190340742 | Finn et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190340805 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190342499 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2820732 | Dec 2014 | CA |
19710743 | Sep 1998 | DE |
1961919 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2545271 | Jun 2017 | GB |
06235700 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2015161247 | Sep 2015 | JP |
191452 | Jul 2013 | SG |
2013088709 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2016112018 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016123508 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2016176524 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’,(2010) Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68. |
Li1 Ming; Holland1 Stephen D.; and Meeker1 William Q.1 “Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data” (2010). Statistics Preprints. 69. |
Henneke et al. ‘Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography’, ASTM special technical publication (696), American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979, pp. 83-95. |
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible; Apr. 17, 2012. |
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261. Feb. 1, 2017. |
Emmanuel J. Cand'es1,2, Xiaodong Li2, Yi Ma3,4, and John Wright4, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, (1)Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (2)Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (3,4) Electrical and Computer Engineering, UIUC, Urbana, IL (4) Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China, Dec. 17, 2009. |
Sebastien Parent; “From Human to Machine: How to Be Prepared for Integration of Automated Visual Inspection” Quality Magazine, https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976. Jul. 2, 2014. |
http://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb, 2016. |
U.S. Office action dated Jul. 23, 2018 issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,944. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,227. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 28, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,985. |
Blachnio et al, “Assessment of Technical Condition Demonstrated by Gas Turbine Blades by Processing of Images of Their Surfaces”, Journal of KONBiN, 1(21), 2012, pp. 41-50. |
Raskar et al., ‘A Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-flash Imaging’ ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2004 http://www.merl.com/publications/docs/TR2006-107.pdf. |
Feris et al., ‘Specular Reflection Reduction with Multi-Flash Imaging’, 17th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 2004. http://rogerioferis.com/publications/FerisSIB04.pdf. |
Holland, “First Measurements from a New Broadband Vibrothermography Measurement System”, AIP Conference Proceedings, 894 (2007), pp. 478-483. http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.2718010 \. |
Gao et al., ‘Detecting Cracks in Aircraft Engine Fan Blades Using Vibrothermography Nondestructive Evaluation’, RESS Special Issue on Accelerated Testing, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.009. |
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68. |
Holland, ‘Thermographic Signal Reconstruction for Vibrothermography’, Infrared Physics & Technology 54 (2011) 503-511. |
Li et al., ‘Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 69. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/69. |
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261. |
Henneke et al. 'Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography', ASTM special technical publication (696), 1979, pp. 83-95. |
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 19, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,270. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,242. |
E. J. Candès, X. Li, Y. Ma, and J. Wright, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, submitted. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/˜candes/papers/RobustPCA.pdf. |
M. Sznaier, O. Camps, N. Ozay, T. Ding, G. Tadmor and D. Brooks, “The Role of Dynamics in Extracting Information Sparsely Encoded in High Dimensional Data Streams”, in Dynamics of Information Systems, Hirsch, M.J.; Pardalos, P.M.; Murphey, R. (Eds.), pp. 1-28, Springer Verlag, 2010. |
M. Fazel, H. Hindi, and S. Boyd, “A Rank Minimization Heuristic with Application to Minimum Order System Approximation”, American Control Conference, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 4734-4739, Jun. 2001. |
Meola et al., ‘An Excursus on Infrared Thermography Imaging’, J. Imaging 2016, 2, 36 http://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/2/4/36/pdf. |
Yu et al., ‘ASIFT: An Algorithm for Fully Affine Invariant Comparison’, Image Processing on Line on Feb. 24, 2011. http://www.ipol.im/pub/art/2011/my-asift/article.pdf. |
Schemmel et al., ‘Measurement of Direct Strain Optic Coefficient of YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings at Ghz Frequencies’, Optics Express, v.25, n. 17, Aug. 21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019968. |
Jean-Yves Bouguet, “Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab”, http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/, accessed on Nov. 10, 2017. |
https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976-from-human-to-machine-how-to-be-prepared-for-integration-of-automated-visual-inspection. |
hittp://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb. |
Yu et al. ‘Shadow Graphs and 3D Texture Reconstruction’, IJCV, vol. 62, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 35-60. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,944. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,205. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,236. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190339131 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |