Automated analysis of thermally-sensitive coating and method therefor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11079285
  • Patent Number
    11,079,285
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 4, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 3, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method for thermally-sensitive coating analysis of a component includes imaging the coated, exposed component over a range of distinct frequencies as selected by a narrowband variable filter; estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) for every pixel at every wavelength; constructing a 2D temperature map on a pixel-by-pixel basis using the non-uniformity correction; and mapping the 2D temperature map to a 3D computer aided design (CAD) model.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to nondestructive component inspection and, more particularly, to automated analysis of thermally-sensitive coating.


Mechanical components, especially for gas turbines, may be exposed to high temperatures during design or during operation. These components may be coated with a thermally-sensitive coating to indicate maximum temperature exposure, integrated time-temperature exposure, and the like. In some cases, the thermally-sensitive coating permanently changes color (an oxidation reaction) depending on duration and exposure temperature. Interpretation of the color change is often performed manually which may be tedious, time consuming, imprecise, and error prone.


SUMMARY

A method for thermally-sensitive coating analysis of a component, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes performing one or more scans of a thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component to generate image data; estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) for one or more pixels of one or more dark field images and one or more corresponding pixels of one or more bright field images; constructing a 2D temperature map for one or more pixels of the scanned image using the parameters from the non-uniformity correction; and mapping the 2D temperature map to a 3D computer aided design (CAD) model.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes scanning over one or more of a range of distinct frequencies as selected by a narrowband variable filter, a distinct range of polarizations, and a distinct range of incident angles.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes defining a cost function and minimizing the error between the 3D coordinates by back-projecting features from the 2D temperature map.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes using a non-linear least squares method.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes defining intensities of one or more pixels of a dark field as null and defining intensities of corresponding one or more pixels of a bright field to a nominal intensity.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes detecting bad pixels.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes determining if a value or difference from a dark value to a bright value (slope) is greater than a threshold.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes determining if a ratio from a bright value to a dark value (slope) is greater than a threshold.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of the scans, dark field images, and bright field images are filtered by one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that a dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the dark field values.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that a bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the bright field values.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of a dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the filtered dark field values, and a bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the filtered bright field values.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that one or more of a number of scans, number of dark field images, and number of bright field images is determined by the convergence of estimates for the mean, and a standard deviation as the number of scans increases.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the estimates converge when additional scans change the estimate by less than a pre-defined amount.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the pre-defined amount is 1%.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes finding a correspondence between a feature of the 2D temperature map and a feature of the 3D model; recovering extrinsic parameters via optimization using the correspondence; transforming the 2D temperature map to derive positioning and orientation; and projecting the 2D temperature map with respect to the extrinsic parameters.


A thermally-sensitive coating analysis system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes one or more of a narrowband multispectral filter, a polarization filter, an incident angle variation for the multispectral camera; and a control system operable to map a 2D temperature map from the multispectral camera to a 3D CAD model using image analytics in which repeated scans by the multispectral camera are filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes one or more repeated scans of a dark field image, a bright field image, a test coupon, and the component.


A further aspect of the present disclosure includes that the filtering comprises one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.


The foregoing features and elements may be combined in various combinations without exclusivity, unless expressly indicated otherwise. These features and elements as well as the operation thereof will become more apparent in light of the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood; however, the following description and drawings are intended to be exemplary in nature and non-limiting.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:



FIG. 1 is a schematic of an example gas turbine engine component that has been painted by a thermally-sensitive coating after exposure to a high temperature.



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a nondestructive thermally-sensitive coating analysis system.



FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the method of thermally-sensitive coating analysis.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram representing a method of thermally-sensitive coating analysis.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a thermally-sensitive coating on a test coupon after exposure to a high temperature.



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a 2D temperature map data of the component.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram representing projecting the 2D temperature map data to a 3D CAD model of the component.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a 3D CAD model of the component with a superimposed temperature map.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a component 20, such as a gas turbine engine component, that has been coated with a thermally-sensitive coating 30 and heated to create a color-temperature reference. Although a particular component is illustrated in the disclosed embodiment, it should be appreciated that various components will benefit herefrom. The thermally-sensitive coating 30 indicates maximum temperature exposure, integrated time-temperature exposure, and other temperature information. The thermally-sensitive coating 30 may permanently change color (an oxidation reaction) depending on the duration and temperature to which it is exposed. Different chemical compositions of thermally-sensitive coating 30 are relatively more or less sensitive and exhibit color changes over different color ranges (light frequencies) for different exposure temperatures and durations. The thermally-sensitive coating 30 may include many different thermally sensitive paints, e.g., part number MC520-7 by TMC Hallcrest, Inc.


With reference to FIG. 2, a nondestructive thermally-sensitive coating analysis system 200 includes an optical system 210 with a high resolution, high dynamic range multispectral camera 220, a narrowband multispectral filter 230, and a control system 250. A prior art analysis system 200 may be an ISPEC 30-band multispectral camera from Geospatial Systems Inc., part number PM-UM-2005.1.00. covering a 400 nm-700 nm wavelength range that includes a relatively low resolution, low dynamic range commercial camera. Various commercial cameras such as the ISPEC camera can be further modified with additional lenses such as, for, example custom lenses with as small chromatic and geometrical distortions as possible. The ISPEC commercial camera may be beneficially replaced with a high-resolution, high-dynamic range camera. An example narrowband multispectral filter 230 as used in the PM-UM-2005.1.00 is an electro-optic Liquid Crystal Tunable Filter (LCTF) that operates as a programmable filter wheel. The LCTF has a fixed 10 nm bandpass and the center wavelength can be tuned in 10 nm increments across 400 nm-700 nm. The PM-UM-2005.1.00 control system tunes the LCTF through a range of wavelengths, takes a single exposure for a predefined exposure time and fixed aperture for each wavelength, and records the resulting image data set. Alternatively, control system 250 allows computer-controlled multiple exposures where the number of exposures is based on achieving a desired accuracy as explained elsewhere herein. This may include computer controlled multiple exposures over a range of exposure times and/or aperture settings (f-stops) to provide data for computing an increased dynamic range. The multiple exposures may be made by a 2D sensor of a stationary component, a stationary 1D sensor of a moving component, or a moving 1D sensor of a stationary component. The sensor or component may be advantageously moved by a platform driven by a stepper motor with an encoder on the stepper motor shaft to provide information to the control system 250 as to the motion. Alternatively, a lensless single-exposure imaging system with a random mask placed in front of an image sensor is utilized such that very point within the field-of-view projects a unique pseudorandom pattern of caustics on the sensor. The pattern of caustics data may then be computationally converted into high-dynamic-range and/or multispectral images.


The control system 250 may include at least one processor 252, a memory 254, and an input/output (I/O) subsystem 256. The control system 250 may be embodied as any type of computing device, a workstation, a server, an enterprise computer system, a network of computers, a combination of computers and other electronic devices, or other electronic devices. The processor 252 and the I/O subsystem 256 are communicatively coupled to the memory 254. The memory 254 may be embodied as any type of computer memory device (e.g., various forms of random access or sequential access memory, permanent or transitory). The I/O subsystem 256 may also be communicatively coupled to a number of hardware, firmware, and/or software components, including a data storage device 254, a display 260, and a user interface (UI) subsystem 262. The data storage device 254 may include one or more hard drives or other suitable persistent storage devices. A database 270 may reside at least temporarily in the data storage device 254 and/or other data storage devices (e.g., data storage devices that are “in the cloud” or otherwise connected to the control system 250 by a network).


The control system 250 may also include other hardware, firmware, and/or software components that are configured to perform the functions disclosed herein, including a driver 280 for a camera controller 284, a driver 282 for a filter controller 286, a non-uniformity correction (NUC) and scan graphical user interface (GUI) 290, and an analysis and temperature map graphical user interface (GUI) 292. The control system 250 may include other computing devices (e.g., servers, mobile computing devices, etc.) and computer aided manufacturer (CAM) systems which may be in communication with each other and/or the control system 250 via a communication network to perform one or more of the disclosed functions.


With reference to FIGS. 3 and 4, one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of a method 300 for thermally-sensitive coating analysis includes three primary processes including a non-uniformity correction (NUC) (process 310), mapping (process 320) and component temperature estimation (process 330).


The non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310 of the method 300, which may be performed once for a given camera/illumination/site setting includes utilizing 3-dimensional arrays in which the data is generated from scans of a “dark field” and scans of a “bright field” (step 312). The thermally-sensitive coating analysis system 200 computes coefficients for the non-uniformity correction (NUC) (step 314) and detects bad pixels to eliminate potentially spurious data or otherwise.


The non-uniformity correction (NUC) may be defined in the form:

Corrected intensity=original intensity*slope−shift  (1)


where slope and shift are parameters of the transformation. All variables in equation (1) are 3-dimensional fields: (x, y, frequency band), where x and y are the individual pixel coordinates. In this embodiment, two images (or sets of images) are acquired for estimation: a dark field and a bright field, taken at the same conditions (including illumination, exposure time, aperture, and focus). The targets of the camera are backgrounds of two standard intensities). The bright field may be a uniformly reflective surface, sometimes called a gray field or a white field, where the reflectivity does not cause pixel intensities to saturate. In this example, intensities of all pixels of the dark field should be null, and of the bright field should be equal to some fixed number referred to as nominal intensity. The dark field may be a black image (e.g., taken at no light and using a black colored planar background target). In some embodiments, the pixel values of the dark field scan and bright field scan vary such that equation (1) is defined so that corrected intensities of the scans are uniformly equal to 0 and nominal intensity respectively. In alternative non-limiting embodiments, the variables in equation (1) may be a 3-dimensional field (x, y, polarization); a 3-dimensional field (x, y, incident angle); a 4-dimensional field comprising (x, y and any two of frequency band, polarization, and incident angle); a 5 dimensional field (x, y, frequency band, polarization, incident angle); and the like. Incident angle is the angle between the normal vector of the component at a pixel location and the vector to the camera center. In these embodiments the images are acquired over the range(s) of the variable(s). The computation of the NUC, construction of the temperature map, and component temperature mapping are performed analogously to the 3-dimensional (x, y, frequency band) case as described elsewhere herein. When more than one image (scan) is taken of a dark field, bright field, coupon, or component, the scans may be reduced to a single scan by filtering using a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, inpainting, and the like.


To compute the slope and shift parameters for the (x, y, frequency band) case, the two 3-dimensional arrays, scans of the dark field and scans of the bright field are utilized. The digital signal processing corrects optics and illumination irregularities via repeated scan of the dark field image, the bright field image, and test coupons. At some pixels (x, y, frequency band) the values of the dark field or bright field may be the result of noise or some defect of the optical system. Such pixels are detected and marked as bad pixels. A pixel may be identified as bad if either the value or ratio from dark field value to the bright field value (slope) is greater or less than a threshold. In one example, the dark value threshold may be derived as the mean+3σ of all the dark field values after filtering multiple scans while the bright value threshold may be derived as the mean−3σ of all the bright field values after filtering multiple scans. The ratio threshold may be derived as the mean±3σ of all the slope values after filtering multiple scans. The number of scans may be determined by the convergence of estimates for the mean and standard deviation of pixel values as the number of scans increases. In one non-limiting embodiment, one scan may be sufficient. In other non-limiting embodiments multiple scans may be beneficial to obtain consistent data from ever-changing camera, illumination settings, and electrical noise. The estimates converge when additional scans change the estimate by less than a pre-defined amount, for example about 1%. The scanning may be repeated automatically until convergence is achieved or a predetermined number of iterations have been completed. For all pixels not denoted as bad, a non-uniformity correction (NUC) is computed as in eq. (1). The repeated scans may be filtered, for example, by averaging or with a low pass filter (over space and/or over repeat scans). The data from pixels denoted as bad will not be used in subsequent computation, but may be in-painted, e.g., by deep learning techniques, low-rank approximation, interpolation, and the like.


Next, the constructing of the spectral data-to-temperature mapping 320 of the method 300 is performed. Once the slope and shift parameters are computed, coupons “C” coated with the thermally-sensitive coating 30 and baked at particular known temperatures and durations are scanned (Step 322; FIG. 5). That is, the coupons “C” provide a known reference.


Next, bad pixels are removed (step 324) from coupon scans and the remaining pixel values on a coupon scan are recomputed using the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310, accordingly to the formula (1) described elsewhere herein. These pixel values are stored and used for temperature mapping process described elsewhere herein.


The multispectral camera 220 is then utilized to image the thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component 20 (step 332) over a range of substantially distinct frequencies (colors) as filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter 230. The imaging (scans) of component 20 may be performed repeatedly and filtered as described elsewhere herein for other imaging. The imaging may be over frequency, polarization, incident angle, and the like. The 2D image data may be saved to the database 270 for further processing.


Next, bad pixels are removed (step 334) from the component scan (or filtered scan) and the remaining pixel values are recomputed using the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310, accordingly to the formula (1) described elsewhere herein.


Next, the 2D temperature map 400 (FIG. 6) is constructed for each component 30 via process 330 by applying data-to-temperature mapping on pixel-by-pixel basis using the data collected in process 320 (step 336). An accurate relationship between temperature, duration, and measured color is thereby identified. In one embodiment, the temperature mapping may be performed by a Spectral Angle Map (SAM). In this method, the coupon data are spatially averaged for each temperature, and sample vectors s(t) are constructed for each temperature t for which a coupon is available. Each component of the vector s(t) is equal to mean (in other possible embodiments—median, weighted mean, or other similar statistics) of pixel intensity of the coupon baked at temperature t, at one spectral band. Similarly, for each pixel x of the component not marked as “bad”, intensities at different spectral bands are arranged in the vector d(x) in the same order as in the vectors s(t). Such vectors henceforth will be called spectral vectors. Then temperature t(x) is computed which yields the minimum of (dT(x)s(t))/(∥d(x)∥∥s(t)∥) over all t. That temperature is accepted as temperature estimate at the location x.


In an alternate embodiment, the temperature mapping may be performed by a Maximal Likelihood method. In this method, coupon data are used to estimate multi-dimensional probability densities Pt(d) for the distribution of spectral vectors for all temperatures t for which coupons are available. In one embodiment the probability density can be estimated using Gaussian families of distributions. Then, for each pixel x of the component, intensities at different spectral bands are arranged in the spectral vector d(x) and the temperature t(x) is computed which yields the maximum Pt(d(x)) over all temperatures t.


In yet another embodiment other standard statistical estimation methods such as Bayesian estimation method can be utilized.


After assignment of the temperature to all pixels of a component scan, or filtered component scans, other than bad pixels, the temperature at the locations of bad pixels is assigned by application of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, inpainting, and the like) to the temperatures of all the “not bad” pixels in neighborhood of each bad pixel.


The pixel-by-pixel temperature estimation disclosed elsewhere herein may be further improved by methods reflecting the physics of heat conduction. In particular, the temperature of adjacent pixels cannot vary arbitrarily, but must depend on the thermal conductivity of the relevant materials and the component's construction. In one non-limiting embodiment, the temperature map constructed as disclosed elsewhere herein may be improved using Total Variation regularization, by solving the following optimization problem








minimize

T


(
x
)









x







T


(
x
)


-

t


(
x
)





2




+

μ





(



T




x
1



)

2

+


(



T




x
2



)

2




dx






where t(x) is the temperature map estimated on a pixel-by-pixel basis by the methods described elsewhere herein, T(x) is updated temperature map, μ is the positive parameter to be chosen on the basis of experiments, individually for each analysis system 200 and/or component 20.


Next, the 3D temperature map is constructed for each component 20 via process 330 of the method 300 is performed. The multispectral camera 220 is then utilized to image the thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component 20 (step 332) over a range of substantially distinct frequencies (colors) as filtered by the narrowband multispectral filter 230. The imaging (scans) of component 20 may be performed repeatedly and filtered as described elsewhere herein for other imaging. The imaging may be over frequency, polarization, incident angle, and the like. The 2D image data may be saved to the database 270 for further processing.


Next, bad pixels are removed (step 334) via the non-uniformity correction (NUC) process 310.


Next, the spectral data-to-temperature mapping from procedure 320 is applied (step 336) to obtain the 2D temperature map 400 (FIG. 6).


Next, the 2D temperature map 400 data is mapped to a 3D CAD model 500 (FIG. 8) of the component 20 (step 338; process 900FIG. 7). The mapping may be performed via the definition of a cost function that minimizes errors between the 3D coordinates by back-projecting features from 2D temperature map 400. The 2D image is projected and mapped onto the 3D model using geometric and computer vision methods (process 900). This process can proceed iteratively to improve accuracy. Areas on the component that do not have a thermally sensitive coating, such as holes, along edges or out of line-of-sight, can be detected and automatically removed from the mapping process by 2D image analytics.


The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed by deriving a transformation that transforms the 3D CAD model 500 vertices to 2D pixel coordinates. For example, the transformation can be formulated as a 3×4 matrix containing 11 independent parameters when 2D image pixels and 3D model vertices are represented in homogeneous coordinates. These parameters define relative translation, rotation, stretching, squeezing, shearing, and a 3D-to-2D projection. A minimum of 6 pairs of 3D vertices and 2D pixel coordinates are identified to be corresponding to each other from the image and the 3D model. The identification can be either manual, semi-automatic, or fully automatic. The coordinates of these pixels and vertices can be used first to solve a linear regression problem to get an initial estimate of the 11 parameters. This initial estimate can then be used as starting point to solve a non-linear regression problem using an algorithm such as Gauss-Newton or Levenberg-Marquardt. As a result, the refined values of the 11 parameters can be used to transform the 3D CAD model 500 to match closely with 2D pixels. The 3D CAD model 500 vertices can obtain temperature values from those of their projected coordinates. This mapping uses forward projection, by projecting 3D CAD model 500 vertices to 2D temperature image coordinates.


The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed, in another embodiment, using backward projection. First the 3D vertices are triangulated to form 3D planar triangular surfaces. Then camera center coordinates are calculated from the transformation matrix. Next every image pixel is back-projected though finding an intersection between the line connecting the pixel and the camera center with a 3D planar triangular surface patch. In this way, not only the 3D model vertices obtain temperature values, but also the triangular surface patches, increasing the resolution of the 3D model in terms of temperature mapping. The mapping of the 2D temperature map 400 to the 3D CAD model 500 may be performed, in yet another embodiment, by combining the above two methods.


In another embodiment, a Bayesian color-to-temperature method may be utilized. Here, the parameters of the distribution of color intensity versus temperature and wavelength are determined from calibration coupons. The conditional distributions of intensity given temperature are known for all wavelengths and assumed independent. Bayes' theorem is used to update the posterior probability of temperature given intensity in the image on a pixel-by-pixel basis.


With reference to FIG. 7, one embodiment of a method 900 of mapping the 2D temperature map of component 20 to a 3D CAD model 500 of the component 20 initially includes finding a correspondence between a feature of the 2D temperature map and a feature of the 3D model (step 902) for all available 2D/3D feature pairs. The correspondence may be found by a random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. Next, the extrinsic parameters of high-resolution high-dynamic-range camera 220 are recovered via optimization using the correspondences (step 904). Next, the 3D model is transformed according to the derived extrinsic parameters including position and orientation (step 906) then the 2D temperature map is projected (step 908) with respect to the extrinsic parameters. The optimization then repeats. After the optimization process converges, vertices of the 3D model are projected to the 2D temperature map to get their temperatures. In another embodiment, temperature values of the pixels on the 2D temperature map can also be back-projected to the 3D model to assign vertices of the 3D model temperature values.


The method 300 corrects many of the deficiencies and inaccuracies of existing thermally-sensitive coating image processing techniques by using information about features of the actual scanned component, in the form of a computer model, as well as enhancing the accuracy of the temperature measurements and the estimation process. The automated multispectral inspection system provides detection and quantification of temperature exposure or time-temperature exposure and the automated mapping of that exposure to a 3D CAD model 500 of the component. The method 300 provides a signal to noise improvement by automatically taking multiple scans of the component; a dynamic range improvement from both the camera hardware and signal processing; an accuracy improvement by use of an optimal estimator, and an accuracy and convenience improvement of automated mapping to a 3D CAD model 500 using image analytics.


The use of the terms “a”, “an”, “the”, and similar references in the context of description (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or specifically contradicted by context. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other. It should be appreciated that relative positional terms such as “forward”, “aft”, “upper”, “lower”, “above”, “below”, and the like are with reference to normal operational attitude and should not be considered otherwise limiting.


Although the different non-limiting embodiments have specific illustrated components, the embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from any of the non-limiting embodiments in combination with features or components from any of the other non-limiting embodiments.


It should be appreciated that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be appreciated that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.


Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.


The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason, the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.

Claims
  • 1. A method for non-destructive thermally-sensitive coating analysis of a component under inspection, the method comprising: performing one or more scans of a thermally-sensitive coated and thermally exposed component to generate image data via a multispectral camera displaced from the component;estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) for one or more pixels of one or more dark field images and one or more corresponding pixels of one or more bright field images;constructing a 2D temperature map for one or more pixels of the scanned image using the parameters from the non-uniformity correction; andmapping the 2D temperature map to a 3D computer aided design (CAD) model of the component using image analytics in which repeated scans continue automatically until one or more of a convergence and a fixed number of iterations is reached, wherein the repeated scans comprise one or more repeated scans of a dark field image, a bright field image, a test coupon, and the component, the mapping of each of the repeated scans comprises:finding a correspondence between a feature of the 2D temperature map and a feature of the 3D model;recovering extrinsic parameters via optimization using the correspondence;transforming the 2D temperature map to derive positioning and orientation; andprojecting the 2D temperature map with respect to the extrinsic parameters.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the scanning is over one or more of a range of distinct frequencies as selected by a narrowband variable filter, a distinct range of polarizations, and a distinct range of incident angles.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein mapping the 2D temperature map to a 3D computer aided design (CAD) model comprises defining a cost function and minimizing the error between the 3D coordinates by back-projecting features from the 2D temperature map.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the mapping comprises using a non-linear least squares method.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) comprises defining intensities of one or more pixels of the dark field as null and defining intensities of corresponding one or more pixels of the bright field to a nominal intensity.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein estimating parameters of non-uniformity correction (NUC) comprises detecting bad pixels.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein detecting bad pixels comprises determining if a value or difference from the dark value to the bright value (slope) is greater than a threshold.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein detecting bad pixels comprises determining if a ratio from the bright value to the dark value (slope) is greater than a threshold.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the dark field values.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the bright field values.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the scans, dark field images, and bright field images are filtered by one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.
  • 12. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein one or more of the dark value threshold is derived as being the mean+3σ of all the filtered dark field values, and the bright value threshold is derived as being the mean−3σ of all the filtered bright field values.
  • 13. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein one or more of a number of scans, number of dark field images, and number of bright field images is determined by the convergence of estimates for one or more of a mean and a standard deviation as the number of scans increases.
  • 14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the estimates converge when additional scans change the estimate by less than a pre-defined amount.
  • 15. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the pre-defined amount is 1%.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein at least the dark field image and the bright field image are taken at the same conditions.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein intensities of all pixels of the dark field image are null, and the bright field is equal to a fixed number referred to as nominal intensity.
  • 18. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the bright field image is a uniformly reflective surface.
  • 19. A non-destructive thermally-sensitive coating analysis system comprising: a multispectral camera;one or more of a narrowband multispectral filter, a polarization filter, an incident angle variation for the multispectral camera displaced from the component under inspection; anda control system operable to map a 2D temperature map from the multispectral camera to a 3D CAD model of the component using image analytics in which repeated scans by the multispectral camera are filtered, wherein the repeated scans continue automatically until one or more of a convergence and a fixed number of iterations is reached, the repeated scans comprise one or more repeated scans of a dark field image, a bright field image, a test coupon, and the component.
  • 20. The system as recited in claim 19, wherein the filtering comprises one or more of a mean filter (averaging), a median filter, a rank filter, an adaptive filter, a low-pass filter, and inpainting.
US Referenced Citations (217)
Number Name Date Kind
3804397 Neumann Apr 1974 A
4402053 Kelley et al. Aug 1983 A
4403294 Hamada et al. Sep 1983 A
4873651 Raviv Oct 1989 A
5064291 Reiser Nov 1991 A
5119678 Bashyam et al. Jun 1992 A
5345514 Mandavieh et al. Sep 1994 A
5345515 Nishi et al. Sep 1994 A
5351078 Lemelson Sep 1994 A
5963328 Yoshida et al. Oct 1999 A
6023637 Liu et al. Feb 2000 A
6153889 Jones Nov 2000 A
6177682 Bartulovic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6271520 Tao et al. Aug 2001 B1
6399948 Thomas Jun 2002 B1
6434267 Smith Aug 2002 B1
6462813 Haven et al. Oct 2002 B1
6690016 Watkins et al. Feb 2004 B1
6737648 Fedder et al. May 2004 B2
6759659 Thomas et al. Jul 2004 B2
6804622 Bunker et al. Oct 2004 B2
6907358 Suh et al. Jun 2005 B2
6965120 Beyerer et al. Nov 2005 B1
7026811 Roney, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 B2
7064330 Raulerson et al. Jun 2006 B2
7119338 Thompson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122801 Favro et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129492 Saito et al. Oct 2006 B2
7164146 Weir et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190162 Tenley et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220966 Saito et al. May 2007 B2
7233867 Pisupati et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240556 Georgeson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272529 Hogan et al. Sep 2007 B2
7313961 Tenley et al. Jan 2008 B2
7415882 Fetzer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7446886 Aufmuth et al. Nov 2008 B2
7489811 Brummel et al. Feb 2009 B2
7602963 Nightingale et al. Oct 2009 B2
7689030 Suh et al. Mar 2010 B2
7724925 Shepard May 2010 B2
7738725 Raskar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7823451 Sarr Nov 2010 B2
7966883 Lorraine et al. Jun 2011 B2
8050491 Vaidyanathan Nov 2011 B2
8204294 Alloo et al. Jun 2012 B2
8208711 Venkatachalam et al. Jun 2012 B2
8221825 Reitz et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239424 Haigh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8413917 Wang et al. Apr 2013 B2
8449176 Shepard May 2013 B2
8520931 Tateno Aug 2013 B2
8528317 Gerez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8692887 Ringermacher et al. Apr 2014 B2
8744166 Scheid et al. Jun 2014 B2
8761490 Scheid et al. Jun 2014 B2
8781209 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781210 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792705 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8913825 Taguchi et al. Dec 2014 B2
8983794 Motzer et al. Mar 2015 B1
9037381 Care May 2015 B2
9046497 Kush et al. Jun 2015 B2
9066028 Koshti Jun 2015 B1
9080453 Shepard et al. Jul 2015 B2
9116071 Hatcher, Jr. et al. Aug 2015 B2
9134280 Cataldo et al. Sep 2015 B2
9146205 Renshaw et al. Sep 2015 B2
9151698 Jahnke et al. Oct 2015 B2
9154743 Hatcher, Jr. et al. Oct 2015 B2
9240049 Ciurea et al. Jan 2016 B2
9251582 Lim et al. Feb 2016 B2
9300865 Wang et al. Mar 2016 B2
9305345 Lim et al. Apr 2016 B2
9458735 Diwinsky et al. Oct 2016 B1
9465385 Kamioka et al. Oct 2016 B2
9467628 Geng et al. Oct 2016 B2
9471057 Scheid et al. Oct 2016 B2
9476798 Pandey et al. Oct 2016 B2
9476842 Drescher et al. Oct 2016 B2
9483820 Lim et al. Nov 2016 B2
9488592 Maresca et al. Nov 2016 B1
9519844 Thompson et al. Dec 2016 B1
9594059 Brady et al. Mar 2017 B1
9734568 Vajaria et al. May 2017 B2
9785919 Diwinsky et al. Oct 2017 B2
9804997 Sharp et al. Oct 2017 B2
9808933 Lin et al. Nov 2017 B2
9981382 Strauss et al. May 2018 B1
10438036 Reome et al. Oct 2019 B1
20020121602 Thomas et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020167660 Zaslavsky Nov 2002 A1
20030117395 Yoon Jun 2003 A1
20030205671 Thomas et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040089811 Lewis et al. May 2004 A1
20040089812 Favro et al. May 2004 A1
20040139805 Antonelli et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040201672 Varadarajan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240600 Freyer et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245469 Favro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040247170 Furze et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008215 Shepard Jan 2005 A1
20050113060 Lowery May 2005 A1
20050151083 Favro et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050167596 Rothenfusser et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050276907 Harris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060012790 Furze et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060078193 Brummel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060086912 Weir et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070007733 Hogarth et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017297 Georgeson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070045544 Favro et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080022775 Sathish et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080053234 Staroselsky et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080075484 Komiya Mar 2008 A1
20080111074 Weir et al. May 2008 A1
20080183402 Malkin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080229834 Bossi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247635 Davis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247636 Davis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090000382 Sathish et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010507 Geng Jan 2009 A1
20090066939 Venkatachalam et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090128643 Kondo et al. May 2009 A1
20090252987 Greene, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20090279772 Sun et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090312956 Zombo et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100124369 Wu May 2010 A1
20100212430 Murai et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100220910 Kaucic et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110062339 Ruhge et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083705 Stone et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110119020 Key May 2011 A1
20110123093 Alloo et al. May 2011 A1
20110299752 Sun Dec 2011 A1
20110302694 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120154599 Huang Jun 2012 A1
20120188380 Drescher et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120249959 You et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120275667 Lu Nov 2012 A1
20120293647 Singh Nov 2012 A1
20130028478 St-Pierre et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041614 Shepard et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130070897 Jacotin Mar 2013 A1
20130113914 Scheid et al. May 2013 A1
20130113916 Scheid et al. May 2013 A1
20130163849 Jahnke et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130235897 Bouteyre et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250067 Laxhuber et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140022357 Yu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140056507 Doyle et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140098836 Bird Apr 2014 A1
20140184786 Georgeson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140185912 Lim et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198185 Haugen et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140200832 Troy et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140350338 Tanaka et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150041654 Barychev et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150046098 Jack et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150086083 Chaudhry et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150128709 Stewart et al. May 2015 A1
20150138342 Brdar et al. May 2015 A1
20150185128 Chang et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150233714 Kim Aug 2015 A1
20150253266 Lucon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150314901 Murray et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150371431 Korb Dec 2015 A1
20160012588 Taguchi et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160043008 Murray et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160109283 Broussais-Colella et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160178532 Lim et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160241793 Ravirala et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160284098 Okumura et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160314571 Finn et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160328835 Maresca, Jr. et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160334284 Kaplun Mucharrafille et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170011503 Newman Jan 2017 A1
20170023505 Maione et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170052152 Tat et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170085760 Ernst et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170090458 Lim et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170122123 Kell et al. May 2017 A1
20170142302 Shaw et al. May 2017 A1
20170184469 Chang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170184549 Reed et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170184650 Chang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170211408 Ahmadian et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170219815 Letter et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170221274 Chen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170234837 Hall et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170241286 Roberts et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170258391 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262965 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262977 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262979 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262985 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262986 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170270651 Bailey et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170284971 Hall Oct 2017 A1
20170297095 Zalameda et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180002039 Finn et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005362 Wang et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180013959 Slavens et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180019097 Harada et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180098000 Park et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180111239 Zak et al. Apr 2018 A1
20190299542 Webb Oct 2019 A1
20190338666 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339165 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339206 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339207 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339234 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339235 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190340721 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190340742 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190340805 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190342499 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
2820732 Dec 2014 CA
19710743 Sep 1998 DE
1961919 Aug 2008 EP
2545271 Jun 2017 GB
06235700 Aug 1994 JP
2015161247 Sep 2015 JP
191452 Jul 2013 SG
2013088709 Jun 2013 WO
2016112018 Jul 2016 WO
2016123508 Aug 2016 WO
2016176524 Nov 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (45)
Entry
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’,(2010) Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68.
Li1 Ming; Holland1 Stephen D.; and Meeker1 William Q.1 “Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data” (2010). Statistics Preprints. 69.
Henneke et al. ‘Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography’, ASTM special technical publication (696), American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979, pp. 83-95.
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible; Apr. 17, 2012.
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261. Feb. 1, 2017.
Emmanuel J. Cand'es1,2, Xiaodong Li2, Yi Ma3,4, and John Wright4, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, (1)Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (2)Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (3,4) Electrical and Computer Engineering, UIUC, Urbana, IL (4) Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China, Dec. 17, 2009.
Sebastien Parent; “From Human to Machine: How to Be Prepared for Integration of Automated Visual Inspection” Quality Magazine, https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976. Jul. 2, 2014.
http://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb, 2016.
U.S. Office action dated Jul. 23, 2018 issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,944.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,227.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 28, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,985.
Blachnio et al, “Assessment of Technical Condition Demonstrated by Gas Turbine Blades by Processing of Images of Their Surfaces”, Journal of KONBiN, 1(21), 2012, pp. 41-50.
Raskar et al., ‘A Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-flash Imaging’ ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2004 http://www.merl.com/publications/docs/TR2006-107.pdf.
Feris et al., ‘Specular Reflection Reduction with Multi-Flash Imaging’, 17th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 2004. http://rogerioferis.com/publications/FerisSIB04.pdf.
Holland, “First Measurements from a New Broadband Vibrothermography Measurement System”, AIP Conference Proceedings, 894 (2007), pp. 478-483. http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.2718010 \.
Gao et al., ‘Detecting Cracks in Aircraft Engine Fan Blades Using Vibrothermography Nondestructive Evaluation’, RESS Special Issue on Accelerated Testing, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.009.
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68.
Holland, ‘Thermographic Signal Reconstruction for Vibrothermography’, Infrared Physics & Technology 54 (2011) 503-511.
Li et al., ‘Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 69. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/69.
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261.
Henneke et al. 'Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography', ASTM special technical publication (696), 1979, pp. 83-95.
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible.
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 19, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,270.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,242.
E. J. Candès, X. Li, Y. Ma, and J. Wright, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, submitted. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/˜candes/papers/RobustPCA.pdf.
M. Sznaier, O. Camps, N. Ozay, T. Ding, G. Tadmor and D. Brooks, “The Role of Dynamics in Extracting Information Sparsely Encoded in High Dimensional Data Streams”, in Dynamics of Information Systems, Hirsch, M.J.; Pardalos, P.M.; Murphey, R. (Eds.), pp. 1-28, Springer Verlag, 2010.
M. Fazel, H. Hindi, and S. Boyd, “A Rank Minimization Heuristic with Application to Minimum Order System Approximation”, American Control Conference, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 4734-4739, Jun. 2001.
Meola et al., ‘An Excursus on Infrared Thermography Imaging’, J. Imaging 2016, 2, 36 http://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/2/4/36/pdf.
Yu et al., ‘ASIFT: An Algorithm for Fully Affine Invariant Comparison’, Image Processing on Line on Feb. 24, 2011. http://www.ipol.im/pub/art/2011/my-asift/article.pdf.
Schemmel et al., ‘Measurement of Direct Strain Optic Coefficient of YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings at Ghz Frequencies’, Optics Express, v.25, n. 17, Aug. 21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019968.
Jean-Yves Bouguet, “Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab”, http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/, accessed on Nov. 10, 2017.
https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976-from-human-to-machine-how-to-be-prepared-for-integration-of-automated-visual-inspection.
hittp://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb.
Yu et al. ‘Shadow Graphs and 3D Texture Reconstruction’, IJCV, vol. 62, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 35-60.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,944.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,205.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,236.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190339131 A1 Nov 2019 US