1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for tuning a transmitting and receiving antenna to a resonant frequency. More particularly, the invention discloses an antenna, such as that used in conjunction with a radio frequency identification (RFID) tag, having a plurality of fuses or antifuses, or both, in conjunction therewith. The fuses and antifuses may be initiated to extend or shorten the antenna to tune to a resonant frequency.
2. State of the Art
Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology uses electromagnetic energy as a medium through which to send information. Small radio frequency communication systems, such as a RFID tag, may be affixed to various articles so that the articles may be easily tracked during movement from one point to another, or identified, such as through a sales transaction. Therefore, one may tag objects such as items, animals, and people, to be identified or tracked automatically via a reader. The reader may be connected to a host computer which may additionally contain data related to an object's identification code associated with the RFID tag. Furthermore, an RFID tag conventionally also contains programmed information about an object to which it is attached. Through the use of such information, RFID technology may be used to identify objects automatically and without manual handling operations as is required in most bar code systems. In a conventional RFID tag system, a receiver, a transmitter, an antenna, and memory are implemented. RFID tags, their use and operation are well known in the art.
Additionally, the general structures and methods of fabricating RFID tags are well known in the art. RFID tags are enabled to receive, store, and transmit article-identifying data with a remote base station. RFID tags have been implemented using a variety of methodologies to allow a user to perform any number of desired identification functions. For example, RFID tags may comprise read-only or read-write capacity. Additionally, passive RFID tags may be implemented with an internal power source, or without an internal power source, drawing their power from the radio frequency (RF) energy transmitted from the reader. As well, RFID tags may be configured to operate at low, medium or high frequencies, depending on the needs for a desired application. U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,581 to Lilly et al. (Jul. 7, 1998) even describes an RF semiconductor circuit that may selectively operate at low, medium and high frequencies by switching between three separate antenna systems.
To function with a given system, an antenna must be tuned to the internal circuitry and signals transmitted and received by the system. Tuning systems and circuitry for adjusting the internal antenna circuits of RFID tags and similar circuitry are also known in the art. As indicated in
Adjustments to the antenna tuning circuit 4 may be made by the internal circuitry 2, or by a testing device during a testing process. In making adjustments to the RFID circuit settings to tune to a resonant frequency of a communication system, conventional antenna tuning circuits modify the impedance of the antenna tuning circuit 4 by adjusting a variable capacitive or variable inductive element, or both. Once a modification is made, or coincidental with the adjustment being made, the signal characteristics are again compared and more adjustments made until the resonant frequency settings have been determined. Examples of conventional radio frequency antenna communication systems using various forms of impedance adjustments are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,398 to Tuttle (Oct. 19, 1999); U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,581 to Lilly et al. (Jul. 7, 1998); U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,715 to Flaxl (Feb. 13, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,448,110 to Tuttle et al. (Sep. 5, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,724 to Sharma et al. (Oct. 25, 1988; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,723 to Lysobey (Dec. 4, 1984), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The internal antenna tuning circuit components, however, undesirably add to the size of the device, particularly in RFID applications where a desire is for a smaller system. Additionally, by interposing capacitive and inductive components between the antenna and the internal circuitry, additional power is consumed in activating those elements, and additional heat is produced. Furthermore, radio frequency communication devices operating at higher frequencies (several hundred megahertz) are difficult to tune using variable circuit impedance elements such as inductors and capacitors. It is therefore desirable to have a small radio frequency transponder circuit, such as that used in RFID tags, which does not require an additional internal antenna tuning circuit so the overall system can consume less power, produce less heat and use less space.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for tuning a radio frequency antenna, such as that used in radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, to a semiconductor circuit using additional antenna segments coupled to the antenna by fuses and antifuses. According to a first embodiment of the invention, at least one antenna for a RFID tag is disclosed. The antenna comprises a main antenna portion, a plurality of antenna portions, each coupled to the main antenna portion by a fuse, and a plurality of antenna portions, each separated from the main antenna portion by an antifuse. A method of the present invention uses a testing device having probe hardware, software and antenna tuning hardware to test one of the responses of the antenna to a test signal and a signal transmitted from the RFID tag. Based upon the response of the antenna, the testing device may initiate a connect or disconnect operation to attach an additional antenna segment through an antifuse if the antenna is determined to be too short, or detach an antenna segment through a fuse if the antenna is determined to be too long. Alternatively, the testing device may do nothing if the antenna responds within specifications. Additionally, if the testing device determines that the antenna response is not within specifications but cannot determine whether the antenna is too long or too short, a method of the present invention has the testing device initiating either a fuse blow operation or an antifuse connect operation and then retests the antenna system to evaluate whether the antenna response improved or became worse as a result of the change. Further testing is based upon the response of the modified antenna. If all of the fuses have been blown, or all of the antifuses have been connected and the antenna still does not operate within specifications, the RFID tag is rejected. The antenna segments attached to the main antenna through fuses and antifuses may be attached in series or in parallel, though series connection is most preferred.
A second embodiment of the invention discloses an RFID tag having internal circuitry, a main antenna and a plurality of antenna segments, each coupled in series to the main antenna through a fuse. The antenna system may be intentionally fabricated such that at least one fused segment needs to be detached for the antenna to operate within specifications. A method of the present invention of testing the RFID tag includes testing the antenna using a testing device such that an antenna response is measured and a fuse is blown if the antenna is determined to be too long or out of specification limits.
A third embodiment of the invention discloses an RFID tag having internal circuitry, a main antenna and a plurality of antenna segments, each attachable to the main antenna in series through an antifuse. The antenna system may be intentionally fabricated such that at least one antifused segment needs to be attached for the antenna to operate within specifications. A method of the present invention of testing the RFID tag includes testing the antenna using a testing device such that an antenna response is measured and an antifuse is connected if the antenna is determined to be too short or out of specification limits.
A radio frequency communication system is disclosed comprising a processor, a memory device, an input, an output and a storage device, a transceiver and a plurality of RFID tags, each having internal circuitry, a main antenna and a plurality of antenna segments, each associated with the main antenna by at least one of a fuse and an antifuse.
The nature of the present invention as well as other embodiments of the present invention may be more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, to the appended claims, and to several drawings herein, wherein:
Shown in
Also shown in
According to this first embodiment of the present invention, rather than using variable capacitors or inductors to adjust the antenna response to signals, antenna segments 16 and 20 are associated with the main antenna 14 through fuses 18 and anti-fuses 22, respectively. Because the testing sequence is primarily controlled through test software 26, a software programmer of ordinary skill in the art may readily modify the software 26 to blow a fuse 18 or initiate an antifuse 22, rather than increase or decrease the inductance or capacitance of an antenna impedance matching circuit, in response to an antenna test. By removing a portion of an antenna coupled to the main antenna 14 through detaching an antenna segment 16 by blowing a fuse 18, the impedance of the antenna is decreased. By adding a portion of an antenna to the main antenna 14 through attaching an antenna segment 20 by initiating an antifuse 22, the impedance of the antenna is increased.
The fuses used for the antenna may be any of those commonly known in the art including, but not limited to, electrically-blown or laser-blown fuses, and may be fabricated on a semiconductor substrate, such as a VLSI fuse, or on a film, such as a RFID package overlay. It is believed that one of ordinary skill in the art will understand how to fabricate antenna segments 16 coupled to a main antenna 14 through fuses 18. Antifuses 22, their use and fabrication are similarly well known in the art.
It should be noted that drastic adjustments in the overall antenna layout and arrangement caused by adding or removing antenna segments 16 and 20 may affect the distribution and reception pattern of the main antenna 14. It is preferred that the antenna segments 16 and 20 be relatively short with respect to the overall length of the main antenna 14, and that the antenna segments 16 and 20 follow the general layout of the main antenna 14. Each antenna layout and desired application is different, however, and one of ordinary skill in the art will readily be able to incorporate additions or subtractions of antenna segments 16 and 20 into an existing antenna scheme.
As shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Though depicted as dipole or linear antennas in the various embodiments herein, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the principles of this invention may be readily applied to any antenna or antenna array configuration, such as a loop, coil or a bowtie antenna. Furthermore, though a particular number of antenna segments may have been shown as illustrative of the present invention, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that any number of antenna segments, and antenna segments of varying sizes, may be associated with a main antenna through fuses and antifuses. One of ordinary skill in the art may readily adapt the principles of the present invention to a particular RFID architecture, layout and application. Additionally, as will be clear to one of ordinary skill in the art, because antennas in the art are formed in embodiments on a semiconductor substrate, and in embodiments off the semiconductor substrate but in electrical contact with the substrate, and fuses and antifuses may be formed either on or off of a semiconductor substrate, the present invention may readily be formed on or off of a semiconductor substrate.
By adjusting the tuning of an RFID circuit antenna through adjusting the length of the antenna rather than adjusting the values of capacitive and inductive components attached to the antenna, less power is consumed, less heat is produced and devices operating at higher frequencies are more easily tuned.
Although the present invention has been shown and described with reference to a particular preferred embodiments various additions, deletions and modifications that are obvious to a person skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, even if not shown or specifically described herein, are deemed to lie within the scope of the invention as encompassed by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/968,424, filed Oct. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,253,737, issued Aug. 7, 2007, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/558,581, filed Apr. 26, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,812, issued Oct. 19, 2004. The disclosure of each of the previously referenced U.S. patent applications and patents is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3155954 | Larrick et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3810147 | Lichtblau | May 1974 | A |
3955201 | Crump | May 1976 | A |
3967202 | Batz | Jun 1976 | A |
4021705 | Lichtblau | May 1977 | A |
4048564 | Gleeson, Jr. | Sep 1977 | A |
4075632 | Baldwin et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4167010 | Kerr | Sep 1979 | A |
4215341 | Cole | Jul 1980 | A |
4470047 | Vogt | Sep 1984 | A |
4486723 | Lysobey | Dec 1984 | A |
4498076 | Lichtblau | Feb 1985 | A |
4560445 | Hoover et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572976 | Fockens | Feb 1986 | A |
4694283 | Reeb | Sep 1987 | A |
4724427 | Carroll | Feb 1988 | A |
4780724 | Sharma et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4782342 | Walton | Nov 1988 | A |
4822990 | Tamada et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825220 | Edward | Apr 1989 | A |
4827395 | Anders et al. | May 1989 | A |
4854328 | Pollack | Aug 1989 | A |
4856082 | Kasa | Aug 1989 | A |
4857893 | Carroll | Aug 1989 | A |
4862160 | Ekchian et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870419 | Baldwin et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888591 | Landt et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890072 | Espe et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4912471 | Tyburski et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924238 | Ploussios | May 1990 | A |
4926182 | Ohta et al. | May 1990 | A |
4952928 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4999636 | Landt et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5030807 | Landt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055968 | Nishi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081445 | Gill et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086290 | Murray | Feb 1992 | A |
5086389 | Hassett et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103209 | Lizzi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5103210 | Rode et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5103222 | Hogen Esch et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5119070 | Matsumoto | Jun 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5144314 | Malmberg et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164985 | Nysen et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175774 | Truax et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5187488 | Van Der Vis | Feb 1993 | A |
5272367 | Dennison et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280643 | Ishii | Jan 1994 | A |
5287112 | Schuermann | Feb 1994 | A |
5299264 | Schotz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300875 | Tuttle | Apr 1994 | A |
5323150 | Tuttle | Jun 1994 | A |
5337063 | Takahira | Aug 1994 | A |
5350710 | Hong et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5365551 | Snodgrass et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374930 | Schuermann | Dec 1994 | A |
5384284 | Doan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5406263 | Tuttle | Apr 1995 | A |
5408690 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420596 | Burrell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420757 | Eberhardt et al. | May 1995 | A |
5432027 | Tuttle et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5448110 | Tuttle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448242 | Sharpe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461385 | Armstrong | Oct 1995 | A |
5471212 | Sharpe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479172 | Smith et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480834 | Lake et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483827 | Kulka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489546 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491484 | Schuermann | Feb 1996 | A |
5491715 | Flaxl | Feb 1996 | A |
5494495 | Tuttle | Feb 1996 | A |
5495260 | Couture | Feb 1996 | A |
5497140 | Tuttle | Mar 1996 | A |
5500650 | Snodgrass et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5521600 | McEwan | May 1996 | A |
5525993 | Pobanz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532707 | Klinger | Jul 1996 | A |
5564086 | Cygan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566441 | Marsh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572226 | Tuttle | Nov 1996 | A |
5574470 | de Vall | Nov 1996 | A |
5579017 | Smith | Nov 1996 | A |
5608380 | Hogen Esch | Mar 1997 | A |
5621412 | Sharpe et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626630 | Markowitz | May 1997 | A |
5649296 | MacLellan et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668560 | Evans et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5751629 | Nova et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771021 | Veghte et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777581 | Lilly et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784687 | Itoh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5822714 | Cato | Oct 1998 | A |
5861809 | Eckstein et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864319 | Paulus | Jan 1999 | A |
5943016 | Snyder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963144 | Kruest | Oct 1999 | A |
5970398 | Tuttle | Oct 1999 | A |
5983363 | Tuttle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005519 | Burns | Dec 1999 | A |
6005891 | Chadwick et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016062 | Nicollian et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025129 | Nova et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028564 | Duan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045652 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061025 | Jackson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104311 | Lastinger | Aug 2000 | A |
6117745 | Krishnan | Sep 2000 | A |
6122494 | Tuttle | Sep 2000 | A |
6130602 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6310579 | Meredith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6396075 | Krishnan | May 2002 | B1 |
6437577 | Fritzmann et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443675 | Kopras et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466131 | Tuttle | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6509837 | Tuttle | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6574454 | Tuttle | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6781508 | Tuttle | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806812 | Cathey | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7253737 | Cathey | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7283035 | Tuttle | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345575 | Tuttle | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7417549 | Cathey | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7565712 | Long et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568288 | Baker | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7722435 | King | May 2010 | B2 |
20070075837 | Tuttle | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070290861 | Cathey | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080100422 | Tuttle | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9805171 | Feb 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070222611 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10968424 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11754841 | US | |
Parent | 09558581 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10968424 | US |