The present disclosure relates generally to mass mailpiece handling systems, and, more particularly, to a system for providing automated on-edge stacking of mailpieces for subsequent processing and mailing.
Direct mail is an important tool for businesses to communicate with customers. In various mass mailing preparations, a mail package may include one or more documents, which may be folded and/or combined with cards or other inserts, all of which must be inserted into an envelope or other form of packaging, which is then sealed, addressed, and stamped for mailing. As such, many businesses turn to mailpiece fabrication systems, such as mailpiece inserters and mailpiece wrappers, to periodically produce a large volume of mail.
Mailpiece fabrication systems are analogous to automated assembly equipment in that sheets, inserts and envelopes are conveyed along a feed path and assembled in, or at, various modules of the mailpiece fabrication system. For example, a mail insertion system or a “mailpiece inserter” is commonly employed for producing mailpieces intended for mass mail communications. Such mailpiece inserters are typically used by organizations such as banks, insurance companies and utility companies for producing a large volume of specific mail communications where the contents of each mailpiece are directed to a particular addressee. Also, other organizations, such as direct mailers, use mailpiece inserters for producing mass mailings where the contents of each mailpiece are substantially identical with respect to each addressee.
For example, the typical inserter system resembles a manufacturing assembly line. Sheets and other raw materials (e.g., other sheets, enclosures, and envelopes) enter the inserter system as inputs. Then, a plurality of different modules or workstations in the inserter system cooperatively operate to process the sheets until a finished mailpiece is produced (i.e., contents of a given mailpiece are eventually placed within an envelope, package, or other carrier-type article and ready for mailing). Once filled, the envelopes are closed, sealed, weighed, and sorted. A postage meter may then be used to apply postage indicia based upon the weight and/or size of the mail piece.
The mailpieces can then be moved to a stacker where mailpieces are collected and stacked, either on-edge or laid flat. For example, an exemplary on-edge stacker, or vertical stacker, is depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 6,398,204, titled “On-Edge Stacking Apparatus”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such an on-edge stacking apparatus accepts envelopes in a flat condition, reorients them approximately 90 degrees to an on-edge position, and stacks the envelopes in a desired order, typically along a conveyor belt (also referred to herein as a “stack accumulating belt”), wherein such stacks of envelopes can then be picked up and placed within trays for subsequent mailing.
Advances in the art of mailpiece inserters have vastly increased the total mailpiece volume and rate of mailpiece production. As such, certain metrics have been used in an attempt to measure machine efficiency of inserter systems, including a metric known as “Mean Pieces Between Errors”. The overall goal is to maximize this number (i.e., increase the mean number of pieces between errors) by reducing the number of paper jam stoppages caused by machine errors. However, it has been observed that current on-edge stacker assemblies can significantly contribute to the total number of errors per a given time period for certain insertion applications. More specifically, current on-edge stacker systems may generally include control inputs allowing for adjustment of certain parameters of the stacker, including pressure switches or knobs that can be manually adjusted by an operator as needed to account for mailpiece characteristics (i.e., mailpiece size, mailpiece thickness, etc.). However, it is difficult to maintain a consistent stack pressure after several hundred envelopes are collated on the stack accumulating belt using such manual control inputs, which thereby results in a high number of machine jam stoppages that directly correlate to the poor output stack quality.
The present invention addresses drawbacks of current stacking techniques, specifically by providing a system for controlling on-edge stacking of mailpieces and maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure of a given stack of mailpieces in an autonomous manner.
In particular, the system of the present invention includes various sensors arranged within an on-edge stacker module, including at least a first sensor configured to measure the thickness of each incoming mailpiece to be stacked, on-edge, and collated with other stacked mailpieces on an accumulating belt, as well as a second sensor configured to measure the pressure of the current stack on the accumulating belt. The system further includes a controller running a stack accumulating belt control algorithm that uses input from the various sensors, including input from the first and second sensors, to thereby provide autonomous control over movement of the accumulating belt so as to maintain a constant ideal stack pressure for a given stack of mailpieces as each incoming mailpiece is received and subsequently stacked.
Accordingly, the present invention essentially provides a closed loop system configured to automatically adjust movement of the accumulator belt on-the-fly by accounting for at least a thickness of each successive incoming mailpiece, such that each incoming mailpiece can be accommodated within a given stack provided at the mailpiece stacking section while maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure for that given stack. As a result, the system of the present invention provides improved quality of a resulting stack of mailpieces. Furthermore, the system of the present invention removes the need for constant manual adjustments to account for changes in mailpiece characteristics, specifically any changes in a given mailpiece thickness, and therefore greatly reduces the number of errors (i.e., jams and the like) from occurring and thus provides a significant improvement in the mean number of pieces produced between errors at the stacker module.
Features and advantages of the claimed subject matter will be apparent from the following detailed description of embodiments consistent therewith, which description should be considered with reference to the accompanying drawings.
For a thorough understanding of the present disclosure, reference should be made to the following detailed description, including the appended claims, in connection with the above-described drawings. Although the present disclosure is described in connection with exemplary embodiments, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the specific forms set forth herein. It is understood that various omissions and substitutions of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances may suggest or render expedient.
By way of overview, the present invention is directed to systems and methods for controlling on-edge stacking of mailpieces and maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure of a given stack of mailpieces in an autonomous manner. In particular, the present invention includes an on-edge stacker module that includes various sensors, including at least a first sensor configured to measure the thickness of each incoming mailpiece to be stacked, on-edge, and collated with other stacked mailpieces on an accumulating belt, as well as a second sensor configured to measure the pressure of the current stack on the accumulating belt. A controller running a stack accumulating belt control algorithm uses input from the various sensors, including input from the first and second sensors, to thereby provide autonomous control over movement of the accumulating belt so as to maintain a constant ideal stack pressure for a given stack of mailpieces as each incoming mailpiece is received and subsequently stacked.
Accordingly, the present invention essentially provides a closed loop system configured to automatically adjust movement of the accumulator belt on-the-fly by accounting for at least a thickness of each successive incoming mailpiece, such that each incoming mailpiece can be accommodated within a given stack provided at the mailpiece stacking section while maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure for that given stack. As a result, the system of the present invention provides improved quality of a resulting stack of mailpieces. Furthermore, the system of the present invention removes the need for constant manual adjustments to account for changes in mailpiece characteristics, specifically any changes in a given mailpiece thickness, and therefore greatly reduces the number of errors (i.e., jams and the like) from occurring and thus provides a significant improvement in the mean number of pieces produced between errors at the stacker module
As described in greater detail herein, the on-edge stacker module can generally be incorporated into a production mail inserter, thereby allowing for the stacker module to receive finished mailpieces from the inserter (generally in a flat, substantially horizontal orientation) reorient said mailpieces approximately 90 degrees to an on-edge position, and stack the mailpieces in a desired order, wherein such stacks of envelopes can then be picked up and placed within trays for subsequent mailing. For example, the on-edge stacker module can be incorporated into, or otherwise operably associated with, modular inserter platforms, including, but not limited to, any one of the EVOLUTION™, MAILSTREAM EVOLUTION™, RIVAL™, and EPIC™ inserter platforms available from DMT Solutions Global Corporation dba BlueCrest (Danbury, CT).
The system 10 includes an input system 12 that feeds paper sheets from a paper web to an accumulating station that accumulates the sheets of paper in collation packets. In some embodiments, only a single sheet of a collation is coded (the control document), which coded information can be one input into the control system 14. The control system includes a processor configured to execute instructions that control the processing of documents in the various stations of the mass mailing inserter system 10. The system 10 may include a user interface 19 for controlling one or more user inputs and displaying one or more outputs from the system 10, allowing a user to interact with and control the operation of the system, can be physically connected to the system or can be located remotely. The user interface 19 can include a screen such as a touchscreen configured to display operating conditions and parameters of the inserter system 10 to a user. The user interface 19 can include other input devices such as a keyboard/keypad or a mouse.
The input system 12 is configured to feed sheets in a paper path, as indicated by arrow 11, along what is known as the main deck of inserter system 10. After sheets are accumulated into collations by input system 12, the collations are folded in folding station 16 and the folded collations are then conveyed to a transport station 18, preferably operative to perform buffering operations for maintaining a proper timing scheme for the processing of documents in insertion system 10.
Each sheet collation is fed from the transport station 18 to an insert feeder station 20. It should be noted that an inserter system 10 may include a plurality of feeder stations, but for clarity, only a single insert feeder 20 is shown. The insert feeder station 20 is configured to convey an insert (e.g., an advertisement or the like) from a supply tray to the main deck of inserter system 10 so as to be combined with the sheet collation conveying along the main deck. The sheet collation along with nested insert(s) are next conveyed into envelope insertion station 22 that is operative to open an unsealed envelope and insert the collation into the opening of the envelope.
The filled envelope may then be conveyed to a station for sealing and/or rearranging the filled envelope for subsequent processing. For example, in some embodiments, the system 10 may include a sealing and flipping station that is operable to wet the adhesive substance on the flap of the envelope, rotate the envelope into a face-up orientation, and seal the envelope by pressing the flap against the body of the envelope. The filled and sealed envelope is then conveyed to postage station 24. In some embodiments, the envelope may then be conveyed to sorting station 26 that sorts the envelopes.
It should be noted that the inserter system 10 may include additional stations/modules for performing additional tasks. For example, mailpiece inserter systems may include a variety of apparatus/modules for conveying and processing a substrate/sheet material along the feed path, in addition to those stations/modules described herein. For example, inserter systems consistent with the present disclosure may further include apparatus/modules for: (i) accumulating printed content to form a multi-sheet collation in an “accumulator”; (ii) folding the content to produce a variety of fold configurations such as a C-fold, Z-fold, bi-fold and gate fold, in a “folder”; (iii) feeding mailpiece inserts such as coupons, brochures, and pamphlets, in combination with the content, in a “chassis module”; and (iv) printing recipient/return addresses and/or postage indicia on the face of the mailpiece envelope at a “print station”.
Finished mailpieces may then be passed along to a stacking station 28, which generally includes an on-edge stacker module configured to stack finished mailpieces vertically (i.e., on any of the edge of the finished mail from a flat, substantially horizontal position). The on-edge stacker module, in combination with the control system 14, is configured to control on-edge stacking of mailpieces and maintain a constant ideal stack pressure of a given stack of mailpieces in an autonomous manner. In particular, as will be described in greater detail herein, various sensors are arranged within the on-edge stacker module, including at least a first sensor configured to measure the thickness of each incoming mailpiece to be stacked, on-edge, and collated with other stacked mailpieces on a stack accumulating belt of the stacker module, as well as a second sensor configured to measure a pressure of a current stack on the accumulating belt. The control system 14 is configured to run a stack accumulating belt control algorithm that uses input from the various sensors, including input from the first and second sensors, to thereby provide autonomous control over movement of the stack accumulating belt so as to maintain a constant ideal stack pressure for a given stack of mailpieces as each incoming mailpiece is received and subsequently stacked.
In some embodiments, the stacking section may include offsetting capabilities, in which certain set of finished mail on the conveyer can be shifted during stacking formation, as compared to another set of finished mail, such that stacks of envelopes can be offset from one another on the accumulating belt. The offsetting function may primarily be used to indicate zip breaks in the mail. When there is a zip break in the mail, it typically indicates the start of a new tray of mail, which is advantageous because it informs the system when to start filling a new tray. As a result, when the system detects a zip code break, a new tray is placed in the tray loading station and the system begins the process of filling up the new tray.
The on-edge stacker module communicates with the control system. In particular, the control system may include standard processors, controllers, and motors as used in the mail handling equipment field. In an exemplary embodiment, the controller may include a programmable logic controller (PLC), a specialized small computer with a built-in operating system designed specifically for controlling machinery. PLC operating systems are able to process incoming events and to react in real time. Another advantage of a PLC is that it is designed to operate reliably in an industrial environment.
The PLC has input lines where sensors are connected to notify upon events (e.g. pressures above/below a certain level, envelopes sensed at a particular location, etc.), and it has output lines to signal any reaction to the incoming events (e.g. feed an envelope, move the accumulating belt, etc.). Where the system includes analog sensors (for example analog pressure sensors) an A/D converter is used to generate the digital signal for input into the PLC. The system is user programmable using standard PLC programming language. Ladder logic programming is used in the preferred embodiment for programming the PLC for the functionality described herein.
In one embodiment, the present invention essentially provides a closed loop system configured to automatically adjust movement of the accumulator belt on-the-fly by accounting for at least a thickness of each successive incoming mailpiece, such that each incoming mailpiece can be accommodated within a given stack provided at the mailpiece stacking section while maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure for that given stack. For example, the control system 14 may include a controller running a stack accumulating belt control algorithm that uses input from the various sensors, including input from at least the thickness sensor and the force sensor, to thereby provide autonomous control over movement of the accumulating belt so as to maintain a constant ideal stack pressure for a given stack of mailpieces as each incoming mailpiece is received and subsequently stacked.
When an envelope arrives at the stacking section, the force sensor is sampled and the force reading is compared to the ideal stack force configuration setting. If the measured stack force is less than an ideal force setpoint, then the accumulating belt is stopped if already moving and will remain stopped until the next envelope arrives. If the measured stack force is greater than the ideal force setpoint, then the accumulating belt indexes forward a certain distance, as calculated by the stack accumulating belt control algorithm.
The stack accumulating belt control algorithm is based on the following equations (Equations 1, 2, and 3):
where U is the load cell voltage, Uz is the voltage during zero pressure or during calibration, and δU0 is the ideal stack pressure (i.e., the ideal voltage change from 0).
where K is the gain factor, which is not constant, but automatically varied based on thicknesses of incoming envelopes. If below a thickness that is less than thick, the gain is varied based on a linear function (of Equation 3).
Where a and b are the line slope and the intercept of the linear function, respectively.
As illustrated in Equations 1, 2 and 3, the stack accumulating belt control algorithm uses the incoming envelope's measured thickness and the difference between actual (U−Uz) and desired (δU0) stack force in combination with a tuning gain factor (K) that varies with envelope thickness to calculate the distance the stacking belt should move before the next envelope arrives and is inserted.
As shown, the stacking section includes D-rollers that are configured to serve at least two functions, which include: 1) remaining in a stationary state, in which corners of each D-roller extend toward the envelope stack and provide support to the stack while simultaneously preventing an incoming on-edge envelope from coming into collision with the stack; and 2) rotating to thereby move an incoming on-edge envelope toward the stack registration wall for insertion into the rear position of the envelope stack. The stacking section further includes an urge roller that is also configured to provide support to the stack while further assisting with the movement of the incoming on-edge envelope toward the stack registration wall so that the on-edge envelope can be inserted into the stack.
The stacking section further includes the force sensor, which is in the form of a load cell that is operably coupled to the D-rollers, urge roller, and the surrounding frame. Accordingly, the load cell is configured to measure stack pressure (i.e., the amount of force exerted upon the D-rollers, urge roller and surrounding frame). The stacking section further includes an exit sensor, which may be in the form of a photocell sensor, that is configured to detect the arrival of an on-edge envelope as it passes from the belt turn-up assembly and into the stacking section. Upon receiving the signal from the photocell sensor indicating the arrival of the on-edge envelope, the stack pressure is measured. In this moment, the D-rollers are in the stationary state, in which the leading edge of the envelope is prevented from moving further toward the stack registration wall while the corners of the D-rollers are supporting a portion of the stack (along with the urge roller).
Upon receiving data from the thickness sensor (i.e., a measurement of thickness of the on-edge envelope queued up to be inserted into the stack) and data from the load sensor (i.e., stack pressure), the controller is configured to determine how far to advance the stack accumulating belt to accommodate the on-edge envelope while maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure of the given stack of envelopes. As such, when an envelope arrives at the stacking section, the force sensor is sampled and the force reading is compared to the ideal stack force configuration setting. If the measured stack force is less than an ideal force setpoint, then the accumulating belt is stopped if already moving and will remain stopped until the next envelope arrives. If the measured stack force is greater than the ideal force setpoint, then the accumulating belt indexes forward a certain distance, as calculated by the stack accumulating belt control algorithm.
Accordingly, the present invention essentially provides a closed loop system configured to automatically adjust movement of the accumulator belt on-the-fly by accounting for at least a thickness of each successive incoming mailpiece, such that each incoming mailpiece can be accommodated within a given stack provided at the mailpiece stacking section while maintaining a constant ideal stack pressure for that given stack. As a result, the system of the present invention provides improved quality of a resulting stack of mailpieces. Furthermore, the system of the present invention removes the need for constant manual adjustments to account for changes in mailpiece characteristics, specifically any changes in a given mailpiece thickness, and therefore greatly reduces the number of errors (i.e., jams and the like) from occurring and thus provides a significant improvement in the mean number of pieces produced between errors at the stacker module.
As used in any embodiment herein, the term “module” may refer to software, firmware and/or circuitry configured to perform any of the aforementioned operations. Software may be embodied as a software package, code, instructions, instruction sets and/or data recorded on non-transitory computer readable storage medium. Firmware may be embodied as code, instructions or instruction sets and/or data that are hard-coded (e.g., nonvolatile) in memory devices. “Circuitry”, as used in any embodiment herein, may comprise, for example, singly or in any combination, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry such as computer processors comprising one or more individual instruction processing cores, state machine circuitry, and/or firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry. The modules may, collectively or individually, be embodied as circuitry that forms part of a larger system, for example, an integrated circuit (IC), system on-chip (SoC), desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, servers, smartphones, etc.
Any of the operations described herein may be implemented in a system that includes one or more storage mediums having stored thereon, individually or in combination, instructions that when executed by one or more processors perform the methods. Here, the processor may include, for example, a server CPU, a mobile device CPU, and/or other programmable circuitry.
Also, it is intended that operations described herein may be distributed across a plurality of physical devices, such as processing structures at more than one different physical location. The storage medium may include any type of tangible medium, for example, any type of disk including hard disks, floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic and static RAMs, erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), flash memories, Solid State Disks (SSDs), magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions. Other embodiments may be implemented as software modules executed by a programmable control device. The storage medium may be non-transitory.
As described herein, various embodiments may be implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or any combination thereof. Examples of hardware elements may include processors, microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic devices (PLD), digital signal processors (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), logic gates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets, and so forth.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
The term “non-transitory” is to be understood to remove only propagating transitory signals per se from the claim scope and does not relinquish rights to all standard computer-readable media that are not only propagating transitory signals per se. Stated another way, the meaning of the term “non-transitory computer-readable medium” and “non-transitory computer-readable storage medium” should be construed to exclude only those types of transitory computer-readable media which were found in In Re Nuijten to fall outside the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described (or portions thereof), and it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the claims. Accordingly, the claims are intended to cover all such equivalents.
References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Various modifications of the invention and many further embodiments thereof, in addition to those shown and described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the full contents of this document, including references to the scientific and patent literature cited herein. The subject matter herein contains important information, exemplification and guidance that can be adapted to the practice of this invention in its various embodiments and equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/448,302, filed Feb. 26, 2023, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63448302 | Feb 2023 | US |