The subject matter disclosed herein relates to gas turbine operations and, more particularly, to automated control of part-speed gas turbine operations to improve flame stability and combustion efficiency in order to affect exhaust temperature spread, combustion dynamics and emissions while not exceeding other boundaries like exhaust temperature limits and acceleration rate limits.
The part-speed operation of a gas turbine is highly transient and subject to large variations due to ambient conditions and the state of the turbine prior to unit start. Additionally, uncertainties in the part-speed air and fuel flows make it particularly challenging to understand part-speed operation. Indeed, while diffusion operation is quite robust and does not require a detailed understanding of the part-speed flows, premix operation is particularly sensitive to these variations.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method of controlling operability of a gas turbine during part-speed operation is provided and includes identifying that a combustion system of the gas turbine is operating at part-speed, the combustion system including a fuel source, fuel circuits and valves operably interposed between the fuel source and the fuel circuits, respectively, defining first and second boundaries based on first and second parameters and automatically controlling each of the valves to control fuel flow to each of the fuel circuits in accordance with the defined first and second boundaries.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method of controlling operability of a gas turbine during part-speed operation is provided and includes identifying that a combustion system of the gas turbine is operating at part-speed, the combustion system including a fuel source, fuel circuits and valves operably interposed between the fuel source and the fuel circuits, respectively, defining lean and rich blow out (LBO and RBO) boundaries based on a fuel nozzle equivalence ratio and a combustor severity parameter and automatically controlling each of the valves to control fuel flow to each of the fuel circuits in accordance with the defined LBO and RBO boundaries.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a system for controlling operability of a gas turbine during part-speed operation is provided and includes a combustion system, which is operable at part-speed to produce a working fluid from combustion, the combustion system including a fuel source, fuel circuits and valves operably interposed between the fuel source and the fuel circuits, respectively, and a controller. The controller includes encoded data relating to first and second boundaries of the combustion system based on first and second parameters of the combustion system and a processor configured to automatically control each of the valves to control fuel flow to each of the fuel circuits in accordance with the defined first and second boundaries.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter, which is regarded as the invention, is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
The description provided below relates to part-speed automated control strategy of a gas turbine engine in which a gas turbine control system automatically controls fuel flows to each of the fuel circuits of the gas turbine engine to improve flame stability and combustion efficiency in order to affect exhaust temperature spread, combustion dynamics and emissions while not exceeding other boundaries like exhaust temperature limits and acceleration rate limits.
With reference to
In accordance with embodiments and, as shown in
The gas turbine engine 10 may further include multiple sensors 20 disposed throughout the compressor 11, the combustor 12 and the turbine section 13. The sensors 20 may include temperature sensors 201, such as thermocouples disposed in the exhaust stream of the combustor 12 to detect exhaust temperatures and in wheelspace cavities in the turbine section 13 to detect temperatures in the wheelspace cavities. The sensors 20 may also include position sensors 202 disposed to provide feedback of the valve stroke of the valve 16, pressure sensors 203 disposed in an inlet (e.g., a bell mouth shaped inlet) of the compressor 11 to measure compressor inlet air flows and pressure and/or flow measurement sensors 204 disposed in the fuel circuits 14 to detect static and dynamic pressures of at least the fuel received in the fuel circuits 14 and to measure fuel flow rates. Taken together, the readings of the sensors 20 provide a picture of cycle conditions, such as pressures, temperatures, air flow and fuel flow, within the gas turbine engine 10 throughout operation.
The gas turbine engine 10 of
For example, with the configuration of the PM1 circuit 141 and the PM2 circuit 142 described above, there may be three or more operational boundaries for controlling equivalence ratio of fuel nozzles. These include a lean blow out (LBO) boundary on fuel nozzle equivalence ratio for the PM1 circuit 141, a rich blow out (RBO) boundary on fuel nozzle equivalence ratio for the PM1 circuit 141 and a third boundary on fuel nozzle equivalence ratio for the PM2 circuit 142. This third boundary is referred to as an attach/detach (A/D) boundary, near which the PM2 circuit 142 flame will exhibit transient behavior by attaching and detaching to the fuel nozzle tip thereby generating high combustion dynamics and instability. Alternatively, the RBO boundary for the PM1 circuit 141 may be combined with limits based on combustion cap metal temperatures or emissions. Moreover, if one only considers the A/D boundary of the PM2 circuit 142, the A/D boundary may be combined with limits based on cross-fire tube temperatures and combustion dynamics.
During operations associated with the part-speed condition, the primary concerns for operability are complete or partial blow out, overheating, excess combustion dynamics amplitude, low combustion efficiencies and excess acceleration. Complete or partial blow out of the flame in one or more combustor 12 cans may lead to high exhaust temperature spreads and may cause the gas turbine engine 10 to trip. One of the causes for such blow out is related to variations in fuel and/or air flow that cause the fuel nozzles to cross their respective boundaries (e.g., the PM1 circuit 141 fuel nozzle equivalence ratio exceeds its LBO or RBO boundary or the PM2 circuit 142 fuel nozzle equivalence ratio crosses the attachment/detachment boundary). Overheating occurs when the PM2 circuit 142 fuel nozzle equivalence ratio becomes too high, combustion dynamics amplitudes in certain frequency range may exceed the acceptable limit for certain parts of the combustor 12, low combustion efficiencies can generate high level of CO and UHC, which can become an issue as emissions regulations become stricter and, at low speed range before the gas turbine engine 10 transitions to acceleration control, acceleration may exceed its limit if too much fuel is commanded. That is, when the gas turbine engine 10 is on acceleration control, the amount of fuel required to follow the acceleration schedule may push the exhaust temperature to its limit.
With reference to
The control allows the processor 322 to control fuel flows to each of the fuel circuits 14 in accordance with the defined first and second operational boundaries of the combustion system 30. The control also allows the processor 322 to apply respective biases toward one or both of the PM1 circuit 141 and the PM2 circuit 142 equivalence ratios. The biases allow for tuning to account for machine-to-machine variations in, e.g., air flow calculations.
With reference to
With the part-speed model formed from the first and second operational boundaries and usable to generate the real-time predictions of the cycle conditions, the processor 322 relates the first and second boundaries to the fuel flows in the fuel circuits 14 via first and second transfer functions, respectively, and manipulates the servo units 323 to automatically control each of the valves 16 to control the fuel flows to each of the fuel circuits 14 in accordance with the defined first and second operational boundaries and the first and second transfer functions (operation 42). The resulting control of the fuel flows to each of the fuel circuits 14 permits the processor 322 to maintain and if necessary improve margins associated with the first and second operational boundaries.
In greater detail and, with reference to
That is, with reference to
As noted above and, in accordance with embodiments, the first operational boundary may be associated with a rich blow out margin (RBO) of the combustion system 30 and the second operational boundary may be associated with a lean blow out (LBO) margin of the combustion system 30. In accordance with further embodiments and, as shown in
In accordance with additional embodiments, the processor 322 may be configured to control combustion efficiency of the combustion system 30 in order to maintain operability margins and improve emissions performance. The processor 322 may also include logic 3221 (see
In accordance with still further embodiments, the processor 322 may include additional logic 3222 (see
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.