Automated court document docketing filing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6430581
  • Patent Number
    6,430,581
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 10, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 6, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
An automated court docketing system that supplies evidence of the time and date that a document was filed with the court. This invention also processes and accepts payment and generates a receipt reflecting the date/time of submission and payment of the required fees. When needed, a docket number is supplied.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates generally to the field of filing systems and more particularly to automated docketing systems.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Governments have created judicial systems for administering justice by resolving disputes between parties. In the United States, each state and the federal government has its own judicial system. The federal and state courts dispense justice in as fair and efficient manner as is possible. The caseload of the federal Judiciary increased in fiscal year 1997, reaching historic levels in nearly every category. For instance, filings in: the twelve regional courts of appeals rose 1 percent to 52,319; the district courts rose 2 percent to 322,390 and; the bankruptcy court filings climbed 23 percent to 1,367,364. The state courts are also experiencing an increase in new case filings. The increase in case filings is making it more difficult for the judiciary to decide cases in a timely manner.




In a typical United States District Court civil filing, a party called the plaintiff presents a document called a complaint to the court clerk. The court clerk reviews the complaint and advises the plaintiff of the required fee. Then the plaintiff pays the specified fee to the clerk. At this point the top page of the complaint may be rubber stamped with a docket number and/or date/time stamped by the clerk and a receipt is given to the plaintiff, if requested. The clerk also records the payment of the filing fee in a ledger and processes the complaint. After the defendant receives a copy of the complaint, the defendant files an answer to the complaint with the court. During the discovery process, the plaintiff and the defendant may file many motions with the court. The plaintiff and defendant may also file motions with the court during pre-trial proceedings. After the trial, the parties may be entitled to file post trial motions. It is not uncommon in some lawsuits for the parties to have over two hundred separate document filings.




Most papers that are filed with the court have to be submitted within specified time periods. Most filings contain many pages. Exhibits containing many pages may also be attached to the filings. Typically, only the first page of a filing contains the docket number and the time the filing was submitted to the court.




One of the problems encountered by the prior art is that sometimes it is difficult to read the rubber stamped docket number. This may cause papers to be filed with the wrong case or the improper docket number to be placed on future filings.




Another problem encountered by the prior art is that an attorney's office may place an improper docket number on a filing, which causes that filing to be filed in another case. The clerk may also misread the docket number and file the paper in the wrong case.




An additional problem encountered by the prior art is that the filing of papers in a court is a complex, manual fragmented process in which many papers have to be received, paid for and entered into the court system.




The bankruptcy court is trying to make it easier for parties to submit petitions and other documents to the court. This is being accomplished by allowing the parties to submit petitions and other documents in an after hours depository. The forgoing does not provide the filer with a receipt that reflects the time of his/her submission to the court or a receipt indicating payment. To facilitate the above type of filing, the Court has previously provided access to a time/date stamping machine to reflect the date and time of his submission to the court. This service was withdrawn after episodes of inadvertent or deliberate filing errors.




An additional problem encountered by the prior art is that a document may be stamped with the incorrect date/time and the actual document may be submitted after the filing deadline for that particular document.




Another problem encountered by the prior art is that the date/time stamp is on the wrong document due to inadvertent error by the filer or clerk.




A further problem encountered by the prior art is that there may be inaccurate fee submission.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing an automated court docketing system that supplies evidence of the time and date that a document was filed with the court. This invention also processes and accepts payment and generates a receipt reflecting the date/time of submission and payment. When needed, a docket number is supplied. The foregoing is advantageous to the court because the court knows the exact date and time that the document was filed. The processing of payment also relieves the court of an administrative burden. The above is advantageous to the party because the party has proof of the actual date and time that the document was filed and the fee paid.




An additional advantage of this invention is that it provides more accurate reporting and checking of the fees received by the court.




It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that any government agency, government department or private organization may use the docketing system of this invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a drawing of a prior art court date/time stamp;





FIG. 2

is a drawing of the date/time stamp


16


of this invention;





FIG. 3

is a drawing showing the date/time/payment/docketing stamp


25


affixed to a document


30


;





FIG. 4

is a drawing showing the date/time/payment/receipt stamp


42


that the filer receives;





FIG. 5

is a block diagram of the system of this invention;





FIG. 6

is a perspective drawing of the housing that contains document acceptor


50


of

FIG. 5

;





FIG. 7

is a drawing of a flow chart of the program contained in system controller


54


of

FIG. 5

; and





FIG. 8

is a drawing of a flow chart showing the interaction of data center computer


65


with system controller


54


and data link


62


;





FIG. 9

is a drawing of a flow chart showing the manner in which data center computers


65


deals with someone who decides to pay for the filing at a later date.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to the drawings in detail, and more particularly to

FIG. 1

, the reference character


11


represents a prior art court date/time stamp. The court date/time stamp


11


contains a indication


12


that a document was filed, the title and name of the court


13


that received the filing, the date/time


14


that the filing was made and the division of the court


15


that received the filing.





FIG. 2

is a drawing of the date/time stamp


16


of this invention. The date/time stamp


16


contains: an indication


17


that a document was filed; the title and name of the court


18


that received the filing; the date/time


19


that the filing was made; the division of the court


20


that received the filing; a graphic identification symbol


21


; a meter identification number


22


; a unique encrypted identification number


23


; and a bar code


24


, that is the bar code equivalent of number


23


. Number


23


may be obtained by encrypting the combination of the meter identification number


22


with the date and time of filing


19


. Any encryption process may be utilized to encrypt number


23


, i.e., Digital Encryption Standard (DES).





FIG. 3

is a drawing showing the date/time/payment/docketing stamp


25


affixed to the first page of a document


30


. The date/time/payment/docketing stamp


25


contains: an indication


17


that a document was filed; the title and name of the court


18


that received the filing; the date/time


19


that the filing was made; the division of the court


20


that received the filing; a graphic identification symbol


21


; a meter identification number


22


; a unique encrypted identification number


23


; and a bar code


24


that is the bar code equivalent of number


23


; the type of filing


31


; the filer


32


; the required fee


33


; the method of payment


34


; the expiration date


35


of the credit card or debit card used; the credit card or debit card number; the approval code


40


; the amount actually paid


41


; and the docket number


37


. Docket number


37


may include the year in which the document is being filed (e.g., 1998), four alphabetic characters that indicate the court in which the document is being filed, and fifteen numbers that indicate the number of the document being filed.





FIG. 4

is a drawing showing the date/time/payment/receipt stamp


42


that the filer receives. Other than the term receipt


43


, the information contained in receipt


42


is the same as the information contained in stamp


25


.





FIG. 5

is a block diagram of the system of this invention. The system comprises: a secure document acceptor


50


; a data center


51


; and a financial center


52


. Secure document acceptor


50


comprises: a filer interface


53


that includes a personal computer keyboard and a touch screen display; a computer/systems controller


54


that is coupled to interface


53


; a debit/credit card module


55


that is coupled to controller


54


; a cash module


56


that is coupled to controller


54


; a document scanner


57


that is coupled to controller


54


; a secure metering module


58


that is coupled to controller


54


; a document marking and holding module


59


(which includes a printer) that is coupled to controller


54


, module


59


will be more fully described in the description of

FIG. 6

; a document storage module


60


that is coupled to controller


54


, a transport module


47


that is coupled to controller


54


; current rates and fees data base


44


that is coupled to controller


54


; a docket data base


48


(which contains all of the previously used docket numbers and a list of docket numbers that may be used) that is coupled to controller


54


; a receipt printer


61


that is coupled to controller


54


; and a data link


62


(data link


62


includes an Electronic Interface Unit [EIU] and a modem) that is coupled to controller


54


and modems


63


and


64


. Documents are moved from module


59


to module


60


after printer


78


(

FIG. 6

) affixes stamp


25


to a document


30


(FIG.


3


). It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that printers


78


and


61


may be combined into one printer that performs the tasks of printers


78


and


61


. An example of data link


62


is the B


900


Data Link Electronic Interface Unit manufactured by Pitney Bowes of Stamford, Conn.




The components of metering module


58


are contained in a secure enclosure that includes physical interlocks or sensors that prevent unauthorized personnel from tampering with the components of metering module


58


. The secure enclosure may be constructed in accordance with United States Federal Information Processing Standard No. 140-1, herein incorporated by reference. Metering module


58


includes an ascending register and a descending register. The ascending register maintains a record of all the fees affixed by the metering module


58


to documents


30


(described in the description of

FIG. 3

) and the descending register maintains a record of the amount of fees that has been purchased by the filers of documents


30


. Each fee transaction performed by metering module


58


is communicated to system controller


54


. Controller


54


classifies the transactions of metering module


58


into various categories. Some of the categories are: the court in which the fee was paid; the location of the court in which the fee was paid; the type of document filed; and the fee for filing the document. The data from the transactional categories are then stored in data link


62


. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that the transactions may be classified into many other different categories.




Document scanner


57


is used to scan the top page of a document


30


to produce a user replica of the top page of document


30


. Scanner


57


may also be used to scan receipt


42


if error conditions exist during the cash acceptance process.




Acceptor


50


also contains a debit/credit card module


55


and a cash module


56


for receiving bills. The manner in which modules


55


and


56


operate are well known in the art.




Data center


51


comprises: a modem


63


; a data center computer


65


that is coupled to modem


63


; a payment data base


66


that is coupled to computer


65


; a court data base


67


that is coupled to computer


65


; a rates and fees data base


68


that is coupled to computer


65


; a registered documents data base


69


that is coupled to computer


65


; a universal name and address directory


45


(that contains current names and addresses for most of the people in the United States); and a statement and billing services


70


that is coupled to computer


65


. Funds data base


66


maintains a record of all credit card funds, debit card funds and currency collected by each court. Each court location that collects funds will have its own listing. Court data base


67


maintains a listing of all court locations. The rates and fees data base


68


list the fees required for the courts services. The registered documents data base


69


lists all information pertaining to the document accepted by acceptor


50


. A universal directory is sold by Pitney Bowes Inc. of Stamford, Conn. under the trade name ReUnion.




The statement and billing services


70


produces periodic statements for the services performed by data center


51


.




Financial center


52


is a bank or credit card center that comprises: a modem


64


that communicates with a computer


48


.





FIG. 6

is a perspective drawing of housing


75


that contains document acceptor


50


of FIG.


5


. The display and keyboard of filer interface


53


is shown on top surface


79


of housing


75


. Module


56


, debit/credit card module


55


, receipt printer


61


and document receiving and marking modules


59


are shown on front surface


80


. Document receiving and marking module


59


includes a drawer that is capable of being pushed into the interior of housing


75


and pulled out of the interior of housing


75


. Module


59


contains a printer


78


that is used to print date/time/payment/docketing stamp


25


on document


30


(described in the description of FIG.


3


). Funds access drawer


76


and document access drawers


77


are connected to rear panel


81


of housing


75


.




The user of system


50


, i.e., the person filing the paper enters information regarding the document to be filed, i.e., type of filing, filers name, the fee due, method of paying the fee, expiration date of the card used to pay the fee, if required, etc., into interface


53


. Relevant information regarding the document to be filed is displayed on the display of interface


53


. The filer pays the required fee by placing cash in module


56


or placing a credit card or debit card in module


55


. After the required fee is received and a notice is placed on the display of interface


53


, the filer places the document to be filed in module


59


and closes the drawer of module


59


. Module


59


is now locked. Then controller


54


(

FIG. 5

) formats stamp


25


, stamp


25


is imprinted on the top sheet of the document placed in the drawer of module


59


. Printer


61


then prints a receipt


42


for the above filing. At this point document scanner


57


may be used to scan the top page of document


30


to produce a user replica of the top page of document


30


. Scanner


57


may also be used to scan receipt


42


if error conditions exist during the cash acceptance process. The document in which stamp


25


is affixed is now moved to document storage module


60


. The document may be moved from module


59


to module


60


by transport module


47


. Module


47


may be a belt connected to a motor. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that other methods may be used by module


47


to move the document from module


59


to module


60


. At a subsequent time an authorized representative of the court opens locked doors


76


and


77


and removes the filed papers and monies collected.




If sufficient fees are not received for the filing, a notice will appear on the display of interface


53


, stamp


25


and receipt


42


. The notice will indicate that the fee has not been fully paid. The notice will also inform the filer of ways in which he/she can pay the fee.




Articles like books, tapes etc. may be returned to their owner or filed with an organization by using the apparatus of this invention. The foregoing may be accomplished by attaching a surface that can be printed on, like a piece of paper, to the top surface of the article and depositing the article in module


59


, and entering relevant information via interface


53


.





FIG. 7

is a drawing of a flow chart of the program contained in system controller


54


of FIG.


5


. The program begins in block


100


, where controller


54


(

FIG. 5

) displays a welcome message on the display of interface


53


. Then the program goes to decision block


101


. Decision block


101


determines whether or not a service has been requested. If a service has not been requested, the program goes back to the input of block


101


. If a service has been requested, the program proceeds to block


103


. Block


103


displays a detailed list of services, i.e., find a docket number, verify a receipt, etc. Now the program goes to decision block


105


. Decision block


105


determines whether or not a service has been selected. If a service has not been selected, the program goes back to the input of block


105


. If a service has been requested, the program proceeds to block


110


.




In block


110


the program reads the current rates and fees data base


44


and displays the filing options on the display of interface


53


. At this point the program goes to decision block


111


. Decision block


111


determines whether or not a service has been selected. If a service has not been selected, the program goes to the input of block


113


. Block


113


determines whether or not the filer wants to quit this program. If the filer wants to quite this program the program goes to block


900


security cycle. If the filer does not want to quit this program, the program goes back to the input of block


111


. If a service has been selected the program proceeds to block


114


. Block


114


reads the payment options and shows the choices on the display of interface


53


, i.e., cash, debit card, credit card. Then the program goes to decision block


115


to determine whether or not a method of payment was selected. Decision block


115


determines whether or not a method of payment has been selected. If a method of payment has not been selected, the program goes to the input of bock


116


. Block


116


determines whether or not the filer wants to quit this program. If the filer wants to quit this program, the program goes to block


900


security cycle. If the filer does not want to quit this program, the program goes back to the input of block


115


. If a method of payment has been selected the program goes to block


117


.




Block


117


transfers the selected transaction parameters to data link


62


. Then the program goes to block


118


to transfer the contents of block


117


to the memory of data link


62


. Now the program goes to block


119


to read to data link


62


and begin the payment process. If the filer selected pay later, the program would go to block


127


. Block


127


would show the pay later terms on the screen of the display of interface


53


and then the program would go to block


500


(FIG.


9


). If the filer did not select the pay later option in block


119


, the program would go to decision block


120


.




Block


120


determines whether or not the payment process is working. If block


120


determines that the payment process is not working, then the program goes back to the input of block


120


. One of the components of the payment process is to verify that the name and address appearing on the filed document matches the name and address in national name and address data bases


45


. If block


120


determines that the payment process is working, then the program goes to the input of decision block


124


. Decision block


124


determines whether or not the payment process was successful. If block


124


determines that the payment process was not successful, the program goes to the input of decision block


125


. Block


125


determines whether or not the filer wants to end this program. If the filer wants to end this program, the program goes to block


900


security cycle. If the filer does not want to end this program, the program goes back to the input of block


124


. If the payment process is successful, the program goes to block


126


..




Block


126


transfers the value of the money credited for the filing of this document to block


118


, i.e., the volatile memory of secure meter module


58


. The money credited information is also shown on the display of interface


53


. At this point the program goes to decision block


128


. Decision block


128


determines whether or not the filer agrees with the money credited information or with the terms of future payment of the filing fee.




If the filer does not agree with the terms of future payment, the program goes to block


900


security cycle. Then the program goes to block


910


to reset the parameters in block


118


, i.e., data link


62


. Now the program goes to decision block


920


. Decision block


920


determines whether or not the drawer in module


59


is empty. If the drawer in module


59


is not empty, the program goes to block


922


. Block


922


asks the user to empty the drawer of module


59


by showing a message on the display of interface


53


. Then the program goes back to the input of decision block


920


. If block


920


determines that the drawer of module


59


is empty, the program proceeds to block


925


to lock the drawer of module


59


. Now the program goes back to the input of block


100


.




If decision block


128


determines that the filer agrees with the money credited information or with the terms of future payment the program goes to block


200


. Block


200


shows instructions on the screen of the display of interface


53


. An example of the aforementioned instructions are “place the document you wish to file face up in the drawer of module


59


”. Then the program goes to block


210


to wait for the placing of the document to be filed in the drawer of module


59


and the closing of the drawer of module


59


. After the drawer of module


59


is closed, the program causes the drawer of module


59


to be locked. Now the program goes to block


220


and prints stamp


25


on the top page of document


30


.




At this point the program goes to block


225


to request transport module


47


to transport document


30


from module


59


to document storage module


60


. Then the program goes to decision block


226


. Block


226


obtains, if requested, the next docket number from docket data base


48


and prints this docket number, if required, within the space provided in stamp


25


, i.e., docket number


37


. Now the program proceeds to decision block


230


. Block


230


determines whether or not the functions performed in blocks


200


to


226


have been completed. If block


230


determines that the functions performed in blocks


200


to


226


have not been completed, the program goes back to the input of block


230


. If block


230


determines that the functions performed in blocks


200


to


226


have been completed, the program goes to the input of block


240


. Block


240


composes receipt


42


and causes printer


61


to print receipt


42


. Then the program goes to block


250


and then to block


800


(FIG.


8


).





FIG. 8

is a drawing of a flow chart showing the interaction of data center computer


65


with system controller


54


and data link


62


. In block


800


the buffer of data link


62


is cleared and then the buffer in data links


62


is set to T=T+1, where T equals the index transaction number. Then the program goes to decision block


802


. Block


802


determines whether or not need meter modules


58


is low or data link


62


or rates and fees data base


44


needs to be updated. If block


802


determines that meter module


58


is not low or the above databases do not need updating, the program goes to block


900


(FIG.


7


). If block


802


determines that meter module


58


is low or the above data bases need updating, the program goes to block


880


. Block


880


connects data link


62


to data center computer


65


. Then the program goes to block


882


to upload all stored transactions center updates and refill meter


58


. The program goes to block


884


to verify all transfers of information to data center computer


65


. Then data links


62


is disconnected from data center computer


65


. At this point program goes to


900


(FIG.


7


).





FIG. 9

is a drawing of a flow chart showing the manner in which data center computers


65


deals with someone who decides to pay for the filing at a later date. In block


500


the buffer of controller


54


is cleared and then the buffer in controller


54


is set to J=J+1, where J equals the index transaction number. Then the program goes to block


502


to request that the user enter his name and address into interface


53


. Now with the program goes to decision block


504


. Decision block


504


determines whether or not the dialogue between the user and interface


53


is complete. If block


504


determines that the dialogue between the user and interface


53


is not complete, the program goes back to the input of block


504


. If block


504


determines that the dialogue between the user and interface


53


is complete, the program goes to the input of block


508


. Block


508


connects data link


62


to data center computer


65


via modem


63


. Then the program goes to block


510


where controller


54


transfers data in controller


54


data to data center computer


65


. At this point the program goes to block


512


where data center computer


65


verifies the data entry and transfers the results to controller


54


. Then the program goes to block


513


to transfer data to the buffer of controller


54


. At this point the program goes to block


514


to disconnect data link


62


from data center computer


65


and to block


777


to input the data in transition data buffer


66


.




Then the program proceeds to decision block


514


to determine whether or not the user's name was found In data base


45


. If block


516


determines that the user's name was found in data base


45


then the program goes to block


128


. If block


516


determines that the users name was not found in data base


45


then the program goes to block


518


to clear the buffer in controller


54


. Then the program goes to block


114


.




The program goes from block


777


to decision block


700


. Decision block


700


determines whether or not had the transaction in transaction data base


66


are complete. If block


700


determines that the transactions are not complete, the program goes back to the input of block


700


. . If block


700


determines that the transactions are complete, the program goes to block


702


. Block


702


transfers the user file in data base


66


.




The above specification describes a new and improved automated docketing system. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principles of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. It is, therefore, intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A computer-controlled system for docketing documents, said system comprising:a housing located at a site; means for depositing a document in the housing; means for printing filing information on the document that indicates the date and time the document was placed in the housing; means for printing information on a receipt that indicates the date and time the document was placed in the housing; means coupled to the computer for paying for the filing of the various documents; means coupled to the computer, the document filing information means and the document receipt printing means for obtaining a unique docket number which comprises: means for obtaining an identification number of the housing located at a site; means for combining the identification number with the date and time of filing the document; means coupled to the combining means for encrypting the combined identification number with the date and time of filing, wherein the unique docket number, name of party filing the document, method for payment for the filing, and type of filing are stored in the computer and printed on the top page of the document by the document filing information means, and the unique docket number, name of party filing the document, method for payment of the filing and type of filing are printed on the receipt by the receipt printing means; and a scanner and printer coupled to the computer and the document to produce a user replica of the now marked top page of the document.
  • 2. The system claimed in claim 1, further including:a computer coupled to the document filing information means and the document receipt printing means, wherein the computer stores the date and time the document was placed in the housing.
  • 3. The system claimed in claim 2, further including:means for entering information about the document into the computer.
  • 4. The system claimed in claim 3, further including:means for entering information about a party filing the document into the computer.
  • 5. The system claimed in claim 2, wherein the document comprises: various types of documents that require different fees.
  • 6. The system claimed in claim 5, further including:means coupled to the computer for listing the fee required to file various documents.
  • 7. The system claimed in claim 6, wherein the paying means comprises:a cash module.
  • 8. The system claimed in claim 6, wherein the paying means comprises:a credit card module; and a credit card center that is coupled to the credit card module, wherein the credit card center approves payment of the required fee.
  • 9. The system claimed in claim 6, wherein the paying means comprises:a debit card module; and a debit card center that is coupled to the credit card module, wherein the debit card center debits payment of the required fee.
  • 10. The system claimed in claim 6, further including:means for obtaining a unique number that is printed on the document by the document filing information means and on the receipt by the document receipt printing means.
  • 11. The system claimed in claim 6, further including:a scanner coupled to the computer and the receipt to produce a replica of the receipt.
  • 12. The system claimed in claim 6, wherein the document comprises:an article having a top surface; and means for attaching a surface that may be printed on to the top surface of the article.
  • 13. The system claimed in claim 6, further including a data center that is coupled to the means for listing the fees to update the fees as required.
  • 14. The system claimed in claim 1, further includinga secure container; and means for transporting a document from the housing to the secured container.
  • 15. The system claimed in claim 1, wherein the housing, the means for depositing, the document filing information means and the document receipt printing means are located at a plurality of sites and means located at a data center for determining whether a filer has been adequately identified wherein the data center comprises:a data center computer that is coupled to the computers located at a plurality of sites so that information is exchanged between the data center and the plurality of sites to check the address of the filer, wherein the data center computer has a list that indicates the location of the sites and a national name and address data base.
  • 16. The system claimed in claim 15, wherein the data center computer stores the information printed on the receipts and on the documents at the sites.
  • 17. The system claimed in claim 16, wherein the data center computer stores the information appearing on the page of the documents at the sites.
  • 18. The system claimed in claim 1, wherein the housing is secure.
  • 19. A method for docketing documents, the method includes the steps of:depositing a document at one of a plurality of secure sites that have an identification code; printing filing information on the document that indicates the date and time the document was placed at one of the sites; printing information on a user receipt that indicates the document was placed at one of the sites; storing the date and time that the document was placed at one of the sites at the site that the document was deposited; paying for the docketing of the document; combining the identification code and the date and time the document was placed at one of the sites to form a unique number; encrypting the unique number; printing the unique, encrypted number, the name of the party filing the document, the method for payment for filing the document, and type of filing on the document; printing the unique, encrypted number, the name of the party filing the document, the method for payment for filing the document, and type of filing on the receipt; and scanning a top page of the document to provide a user replica of the document.
  • 20. The method claimed in claim 19, further including the step of:storing the unique number, the unique docket number and paying for the document at the site that the document was deposited.
  • 21. The method claimed in claim 20, further including the steps of:transferring the unique number, the unique docket number, the paying for the document, and the date and time of depositing to the data center.
Parent Case Info

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS Reference is made to commonly assigned co-pending patent applications: Ser. No. 09/058,025 filed herewith entitled “Electronic Automated Court Document Docketing Filing System” in the name of Patrick D. Mahoney, Terrence M. Doeberl, Ronald P. Sansone and Ronald Reichman.

US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
4597330 Hill et al. Jul 1986 A
4926325 Benton et al. May 1990 A
5159180 Feiler Oct 1992 A
5329447 Leedom, Jr. Jul 1994 A
5586037 Gil et al. Dec 1996 A
5656799 Ramsden et al. Aug 1997 A
5671282 Wolff et al. Sep 1997 A
5845256 Pescitelli et al. Dec 1998 A
5848202 D'Eri et al. Dec 1998 A
5875431 Heckman et al. Feb 1999 A
5903646 Rackman May 1999 A
5944787 Zoken Aug 1999 A
5956687 Wamsley et al. Sep 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
29605986 Jan 1997 DE
19735563 Feb 1999 DE
1466356 Mar 1972 GB
7331902 Dec 1995 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Schweinitz et al., Republic of Germany, Patent No. DE 296 05 986 U1, issued Mar. 30, 1996 (full English translation).*
Mostofizadeh, Javad, Reducing the Costs of Civil Litigation Using New Technologies [online], [retrieved on Mar. 31, 2000]. retrieved from Internet:<URL:http://www.uschastings.edu/plri/fal95tex/newtech.html>, pp. 1-33, 1995.*
Greenspun, Phillip et al., Making way for intelligence in case space, ACM International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 96-103, May 1995.*
Asay, Alan, Electronic Filing of Case File Documents, Session No. 103, Fourth National Court Technology Conference (CTC4), pp. 1-5, Oct. 1994.*
Katzenstein, Robert J, Esq., CLAD—Deleware's Paperless Docket, Session No. 103, Fourth National Court Technology Conference (CTC4), pp. 1-7, Oct. 1994.*
The Electronic filing System [online website], Singapore Network Services, [retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 31, 2000], retrieved from Internet:<URL:http://www.asainconnect.com/efs>, pp. 1-8, 1997.*
Adams, Susan, “For sole custody, touch here”, [online], Forbes: On The Docket: Divorce, American style, [retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 31, 2000], screenshots retrieved from Internet:<URL:http://www.forbes.com/forbes/97/0707/6001106a.htm>, pp. 1-2, Jul. 1997.*
Automated traffic offence management system, [online website], The Subordinate Courts Of Singapore, [retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 31, 2000], retrieved from Internet:<URL:http://www.gov.sg/judiciary/subct/technology/atoms.html>, pp. 1-2, 1997.