1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to management of medical forms.
2. Description of the Related Art
Medical documents are often scanned and processed into an electronic format for easy filing and recording of a patient's medical history. These medical documents encompass a variety of medical forms, such as medical registration forms, consent forms, and screening forms, for example. Depending on the type of medical document, the documents may have different user access rights, security rights, and modes of display.
In one embodiment, a computerized method of assigning attributes to medical forms comprises receiving an electronic copy of a form associated with a patient, determining one or more form types associated with the medical form from a plurality of form types, the plurality of form types comprising one or more of referral, medical record release, consent, and screening, accessing an attribute data structure comprising indications of each of the plurality of form types and one or more attributes associated with each respective form type, selecting attributes of the attribute data structure associated with the determined one or more form types, and storing the electronic copy of the form in a storage location associated with one or more of the selected attributes.
In one embodiment, a computerized system of organizing medical forms completed by a plurality of patients comprises a storage device storing an attribute data structure comprising indications of attributes associated with respective medical form types, the attributes comprising at least a security attribute and a document type attribute for each of the medical form types, an input interface configured to receive a digital representation of a medical-related form, the medical-related form comprising information associated with a patient, and a document management module configured to determine one or more form types associated with the medical-related form and to store the digital representation of the medical-related form with data indicating the attributes from the attribute data structure associated with the determined one or more form types.
In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium comprises software code configured to perform the method of storing a data structure on a storage device, the data structure comprising an indication of one or more document types and one or more attributes that are associated with respective of the document types, receiving an indication of a document type associated with an electronic document, selecting one or more attributes associated with the indicated document type in the data structure, and associating the selected one or more attributes with the electronic document.
In one embodiment, a computerized method of viewing medical forms comprises receiving an indication of an electronic form that a user of a computing system desires to view, accessing attribute data associated with the electronic form, the attribute data comprising at least a security attribute and a document type attribute, determining one or more display parameters for viewing the electronic form based on the attribute data, and generating a user interface comprising a depiction of the electronic form according to the determined display parameters.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein like numerals refer to like elements throughout. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner, simply because it is being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may include several novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or which is essential to practicing the inventions herein described.
As used herein, the terms “medical forms,” “forms,” and “documents” are defined to include any forms related to medical information, images, and patient information. As non-limiting examples, the terms may include, but are not limited to, image screening forms, patient information forms, insurance information forms, information forms for respective exam types, consent forms, and many other types of medical-related forms. Medical forms may be hard copy forms and/or electronic forms of various formats, such as PDF, DOC, XLS, HTML, XML, and various other formats.
As used herein, the terms “series type,” “series,” and “document type” are used to describe a category of forms. In one embodiment, a series is representative of the subject matter of forms associated with the series, such as screening, registration, and/or consent forms. In other embodiments, a series associated with a document indicates other characteristics of the document, such as a form provider or medical facility.
As used herein, the term “attribute” includes, but is not limited to an indicator of a characteristic of each form in of a respective series. In one embodiment, each series is associated with one or more attributes, and the attributes of a respective series are associated with documents in the respective series. Series attributes may comprise information indicating a security level associated with a document, a storage location of a document, a viewer associated with a document, a link to another related document, and/or a document type of a document. Depending on the embodiment, attributes may include indications of other characteristics of forms and/or the information contained in the forms.
Document Management
The exemplary document management device 105 comprises a memory 130, such as random access memory (RAM) for temporary storage of information and a read only memory (ROM) for permanent storage of information, and a mass storage device 120, such as a hard drive, diskette, or optical media storage device. The mass storage device 120 may comprise one or more hard disk drive, optical drive, networked drive, or some combination of various digital storage systems. The document management device 105 also comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 150 for computation. Typically, the modules of the document management device 105 are in data communication via one or more standards-based bus system. In different embodiments, the standards based bus system could be Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), Microchannel, SCSI, Industrial Standard Architecture (ISA) and Extended ISA (EISA) architectures, for example.
The document management device 105 is generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as the Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP, Vista, or other compatible operating systems. In Macintosh systems, the operating system may be any available operating system, such as Mac OS X. In other embodiments, the document management device 105 may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, and I/O services, and provide a user interface, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things.
The exemplary document management device 105 includes one or more of commonly available input/output (I/O) devices and interfaces 110, such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, and printer. In one embodiment, the I/O devices and interfaces 110 include one or more display devices, such as a monitor, that allows the visual presentation of data to a user. More particularly, display devices provide for the presentation of GUIs, application software data, and multimedia presentations, for example. In one embodiment, a GUI includes one or more display panes in which medical images and/or medical forms may be displayed. The document management device 105 may also include one or more multimedia devices 140, such as speakers, video cards, graphics accelerators, and microphones, for example.
In the embodiment of
The forms data store 175 comprises a plurality of hardcopy and/or electronic documents, some of which comprise user editable fields configured to receive patient information. Patients may be asked to complete one or more forms that ask for patient biographical information, insurance information, exam information (e.g. exam modality), consent, or other information. Exemplary forms may include a radiology screening form, a patient information form, an insurance information form, an exam type form, various patient consent forms, and many other types of medical forms.
The scanning device 170 comprises an electronic device that digitizes a form from the forms data store 175. Exemplary scanning devices may include a flatbed scanner, a hand scanner, or a drum scanner. In one embodiment, the scanning device 170 may comprise optical character recognition (OCR) software to translate images of handwritten or typewritten text into machine-editable text. In another embodiment, the scanning device 170 may analyze and decode document type indicators on scanned documents, such as a barcode that indicates a document type. As noted below, in certain embodiments forms may be electronic such that the scanning device 170 may not be necessary.
In one embodiment, the mass storage device 120, 180 may be any device that electronically stores information. Exemplary devices include, but are not limited to a hard disk drive, a flash memory based drive, a thumb drive, and disc-based storage mediums, such as a CD or DVD, for example. In one embodiment, these devices may be networked in series or in parallel with each other and may comprise storage area networks (SAN) for networking with the document management device 105. Depending on the embodiment, the mass storage device 120, 180 may comprise redundant array of independent drives (RAID) for increased data reliability or I/O performance, or both.
In the embodiment of
In step one of
In another embodiment, the forms data store 175 comprises electronic forms comprising medical-related information that do not require scanning. In this embodiment, the forms data store 175 may be accessed directly by the document management device 105, such as via the network 160 or a local area network, for example.
In step two of
In step three, the document management module 145 determines those attributes associated with the determined series of an electronic document and associates the series attributes with the specific document. In one embodiment, the document management module 145 accesses one or more data structures comprising associations between respective series and attributes, such as attributes indicating security/access rights, document type, viewer information, and/or form storage information, for example. The electronic document, along with the corresponding attributes, may then be stored in the mass storage device 120 and/or any other external storage device, such as the mass storage device 180 and/or a storage device of an electronic medical records (“EMR”) system (not shown), for example.
When the document management module 145 has received an electronic form, the document management module 145 associates attributes to the form that direct further automated storage and display rules. For example, a user of the document management device 105 may view at least a portion of the form in a user interface provided by the device 105 and make a determination as to a “series” associated with the form. When the form is included in a particular “series”, the attributes of that series can determine how the form is stored, when it is stored, how it is displayed, and/or it's level of security, for example. Alternatively, the device 105 may automatically associated attributes to the form based on one or more visually detectable characteristics of the form. Advantageously, certain series are associated with one or more attributes so that forms in a particular series may inherit the attributes of that particular series. As discussed above, series attributes may indicate a document type, a link to another documents, and/or a security level of a particular document. The form attributes may be included in a header portion of the digital file or a separate file associated with the digital file, for example.
Form 240 of
After associating the appropriate attributes to the digital forms 210, 212, 214, the forms may be stored in one or more data stores, such as the mass storage device 120, 180. In one embodiment, the processed forms may be stored in one or more folders based on one or more of the attributes. For example, one or more attributes may indicate a folder to which a corresponding form should be stored. In this embodiment, all of the forms in a particular series may be automatically stored in a series-specific folder. In one embodiment, a patient's medical records comprises folders for certain forms, such as a consent folder for storage of executed consent forms. By accessing the document type attribute of forms, consent forms may be identified and the document management module 145 may be configured to automatically move the consent form to the consent folder for the corresponding patient.
The exemplary data structure 310 comprises attribute data associated with six exemplary series. More particularly, the data structure 310 comprises a consent series column 301, a referral series column 302, a screening series column 303, a registration series column 304, an exam series column 305, and an identification series column 306. Each of the series may be associated with one or more attributes, such as security attributes indicated in row 312, link attributes in row 314, series type attributes in row 316, and/or file type attributes in row 318. For example, the exemplary data structure 310 indicates that documents in the referral series should be associated with an open security level, a REFL symbol indicating that the document is a referral document, and that the documents are medical documents (rather than medical images). In one embodiment, the file type of a form (e.g., row 318) indicates a particular viewer or class of viewer that is used by a viewer of the form. For example, medical documents may be opened in a first viewer, such as a word processing or portable document viewer, and medical images may be opened in a second viewer, such as a viewer of radiology imaging software. Depending on the embodiment, the data structure 310 may comprise additional series attributes and/or different attributes associated with respective series. For example, additional attributes may include information regarding image size and image resolution, for example.
The exemplary data structure 310 indicates a link attribute for screening series 303. In one embodiment, link attributes are used to associate two or more types of forms and or specific forms. Using a link attribute may enable form(s) related to a requested form to be automatically opened in response to a link attribute associated with a requested form. In one embodiment, when two or more forms are linked together, both forms may be viewed at the same time when either form is selected. For example, it may be advantageous to have a patient screening form linked to medical images associated with a scheduled exam, so that when the patient screening form is accessed the medical images are opened, listed for easy access by the user, or otherwise brought to the attention of the user.
The file type attributes of
In one embodiment, document types and/or other attributes of a document may indicate a mode of display. For example, certain types of documents may be displayed in a new display container to illustrate and isolate particular features of the document without interrupting the user's eyes from viewing something else, while other types of documents are opened in a currently active display container.
Beginning in block 410, an existing series is selected or a new series is created. For example, the user may create a consent series that is associated with attributes that should be associated with consent forms. Alternatively, the user may select an existing series that may already have one or more associated attributes so that the attributes that are currently associated with the series may be edited.
Next, in block 420 one or more attributes to be associated with the selected series (block 410) are selected by the user. For example, the user may select one or more of a security, link, series, file storage location, file type, and/or any other available attribute to be associated with the selected series. Depending on the embodiment, other attributes may also be available for selection in block 420.
Moving to block 430, the user determines if additional series are to be set up and/or modified to be associated with different attributes. If additional series are to be added and/or modified, the method returns to blocks 410 and then 420.
In block 440, the attributes associated with respective series (e.g., blocks 410-430) are stored in an attribute data structure. As discussed above, the attribute data structure may be accessed by the document management module 145 in order to determine attributes to be associated with a particular electronic document, such as a scanned form.
Beginning in block 510, an electronic document is selected. Selection of an electronic document may comprise selecting an electronic document from a list of electronic documents, such as in a folder of an electronic file structure. Alternatively, selection of an electronic document may comprise scanning a physical document such that a representation of at least a portion of the scanned document is presented to the user in a user interface. In other embodiments, electronic documents may be selected from other sources, such as a networked mass storage device or an EMR system. In one embodiment, batch processing may be used to select a series of electronic documents.
Moving to block 520, the document management module 145 determines one or more series that are associated with the electronic document. In one embodiment, a user of the document management device 105 selects the one or more series associated with the selected electronic document. In one embodiment, a list of available series are presented to the user and the user selects one or more series using an input device, such as a keyboard and/or mouse. In other embodiments, one or more series may be selected using any other means. In one embodiment, a series may be associated with only a single electronic document, while in other embodiments a series may be associated with a group of electronic documents. In another embodiment, the document management system 105 may analyze and decode series indicators on the electronic document, such as a barcode that indicates a series type.
Next, in block 530, the document management module 145 accesses the attribute data structure in order to determine one or more attributes to be associated with the electronic document. The document manager module 145 then associates the appropriate attributes to the electronic document so that the attributes are accessible to authorized users subsequently requesting access to the electronic document. For example, if the user selects the referral series in block 520, those attributes associated with the referral series are associated with the electronic document. In one embodiment, the attributes are stored in a header portion of the electronic document. In another embodiment, the attributes are stored in an index comprising an indication of the electronic document and/or the electronic document storage location, as well as the attributes associated with the electronic document. In other embodiments, the attributes associated with an electronic document may be stored in any other suitable format, such as a separate file that is stored with the electronic document.
After associating attributes with the electronic document, the document may be filed in a specific folder based on one or more attributes of the document. These attributes may indicate that the electronic document should be stored in a particular folder associated with a particular patient and/or a particular scheduled exam of the patient.
Beginning in block 610, the document management device 105 receives an indication of a user selected document. For example, a user of the document management device 105 requests an electronic document for viewing via medical records software. Alternatively, a remote user, such as a user in communication with the document management device 105 via the network 160 may request access to a document stored on the document management device 105. In other embodiments, the documents and their associated attributes are stored remote to the document management device 105. In these embodiments, the indication of a user selected document may be received by a computing device that stores the particular requested document and/or controls access to the electronic documents. Thus, the method of
Moving to block 620, the document management module 105 accesses the attributes of the user selected document. For example, the header information of the document may be accessed in order to determine attributes that are associated with a document.
Continuing to block 630, the requesting user's access rights are determined, such as via an access rights data structure indicating rights associated with respective users. For example, each user may be granted rights to one or more of open, confidential, and/or medical electronic documents.
In block 640, the user rights are compared to any security attributes associated with the electronic document.
Next, in block 650, the document management device 105 determines if the user is authorized to view the requested electronic document. In one embodiment, the determination is based on the comparison of user rights to document security attributes. For example, if the requesting user only has rights to view open electronic documents, the user may be denied access to confidential electronic documents. If the user is determined to have rights to view the requested document, the method continues to block 660 where the electronic document is transmitted to the user, or otherwise made accessible to the user. If, however, the user does not have rights to view the document, the user is not provided access to the electronic document.
The patient scheduled exam field 705 may be used to associate an electronic document displayed in preview pane 710 with a particular patient scheduled exam. As noted above, the patient scheduled exam may comprise the patient identification number and one or more attributes associated with the patient.
The document preview pane 710 may be used to view at least a portion of a selected electronic document. Thus, a user may better perceive the content of the selected electronic document by viewing at least a portion of the document in the preview pane 710. Arrows 714, 715 may be used to move to previous or next electronic documents in a directory of a storage device, such as a scanned images folder on a storage device, for example.
The document selection pane 720 may be used to select an electronic document for assigning attributes. In one embodiment, selecting button 724 displays options/parameters to select an electronic form residing on mass storage device 120, 180, while selecting button 722 may indicate that an electronic document should be acquired from a scanner, and may present the user with scanning parameters that may be adjusted prior to scanning documents.
In the embodiment of
Exemplary user interface 700 further comprises an alter attributes button 734 that may be used to alter attributes associated with a series, such as adding and/or removing attributes associated with a series.
The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. For example, the above-described document management module 145 may be performed on other types of documents, in addition to medical forms. For example, educational forms and business documents may be analyzed using the described systems. As is also stated above, it should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to including any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. The scope of the invention should therefore be construed in accordance with the appended claims and any equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/867,071, filed Nov. 22, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4672683 | Matsueda | Jun 1987 | A |
5123056 | Wilson | Jun 1992 | A |
5431161 | Ryals et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452416 | Hilton et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5542003 | Wofford | Jul 1996 | A |
5734915 | Roewer | Mar 1998 | A |
5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779634 | Ema et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5852646 | Klotz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5926568 | Chaney et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954650 | Saito et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976088 | Urbano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987345 | Engelmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995644 | Lai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6115486 | Cantoni | Sep 2000 | A |
6151581 | Kraftson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175643 | Lai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185320 | Bick et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6304667 | Reitano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6347329 | Evans | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351547 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6424996 | Killcommons et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438533 | Spackman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463169 | Ino et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6532299 | Sachdeva et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532311 | Pritt | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556695 | Packer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563950 | Wiskott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574629 | Cooke et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577753 | Ogawa | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603494 | Banks et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6630937 | Kallergi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6678764 | Parvelescu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697506 | Oian et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6775402 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778689 | Aksit et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820100 | Funahashi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829377 | Milioto | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6864794 | Betz | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886133 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891920 | Minyard et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6917696 | Soenksen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6996205 | Capolunghi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022073 | Fan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027633 | Foran et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031846 | Kaushikkar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043474 | Mojsilovic | May 2006 | B2 |
7050620 | Heckman | May 2006 | B2 |
7092572 | Huang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103205 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106479 | Roy et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110616 | Ditt et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113186 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7149334 | Dehmeshki | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155043 | Daw | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170532 | Sako | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174054 | Manber et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209149 | Jogo | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212661 | Samara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218763 | Belykh et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224852 | Lipton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7260249 | Smith | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263710 | Hummel et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7272610 | Torres | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7412111 | Battle et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450747 | Jabri et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7526114 | Seul et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7545965 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583861 | Hanna et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613335 | McLennan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634121 | Novatzky et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636413 | Toth | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660488 | Reicher et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7787672 | Reicher et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7920152 | Fram et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7953614 | Reicher | May 2011 | B1 |
7970625 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8019138 | Reicher et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065166 | Maresh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8094901 | Reicher et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8217966 | Fram et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244014 | Reicher et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8380533 | Reicher et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8457990 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
20010016822 | Bessette | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010042124 | Barron | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016718 | Rothschild et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021828 | Papier et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020044696 | Sirohey et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073429 | Beane et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091659 | Beaulieu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103673 | Atwood | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103827 | Sesek | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110285 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020180883 | Tomizawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005464 | Gropper et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028402 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037054 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065613 | Smith | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030115083 | Masarie et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030190062 | Noro et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204420 | Wilkes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040024303 | Banks et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086163 | Moriyama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088192 | Schmidt et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114714 | Minyard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143582 | Vu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161164 | Dewaele | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165791 | Kaltanji | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040243435 | Williams | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254816 | Myers | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027570 | Maier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043970 | Hsieh | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065424 | Shah et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108058 | Weidner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114178 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114179 | Brackett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114283 | Pearson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050184988 | Yanof et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197860 | Joffe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238218 | Nakamura | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273009 | Deischinger et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031097 | Lipscher et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058603 | Dave et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060093198 | Fram et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060093199 | Fram et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095423 | Reicher et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095426 | Takachio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106642 | Reicher et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111941 | Blom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060181548 | Hafey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230072 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241979 | Sato et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277075 | Salwan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282408 | Wisely et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070050701 | El Emam et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055550 | Courtney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067124 | Kimpe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073556 | Lau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070124541 | Lang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162308 | Peters | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174079 | Kraus | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192140 | Gropper | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239481 | DiSilvestro et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080059245 | Sakaida et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103828 | Squilla et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080275913 | van Arragon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090129643 | Natanzon et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198514 | Rhodes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100138239 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198608 | Kaboff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201714 | Reicher | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110016430 | Fram | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110267339 | Fram | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110316873 | Reicher | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120163684 | Natanzon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194540 | Reicher | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130083023 | Fram | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007131157 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 7,801,341, 09/2010, Fram et al. (withdrawn) |
US 8,208,705, 06/2012, Reicher et al. (withdrawn) |
Crowley, Rebecca et al., Development of Visual Diagnostic Expertise in Pathology: an Information-processing Study, Jan. 2003, Journal of the American medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 39-51. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 2, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Interview Summary dated May 14, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 13, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 4, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated May 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,673. |
Interview Summary dated Jul. 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,673. |
NonFinal Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Interview Summary dated May 31, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Office Action dated May 16, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Interview Summary dated Sep. 6, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 26, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,645. |
Interview Summary dated Jun. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 1, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 6, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 25, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,758. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 6, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 15, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543. |
Interview Summary dated Apr. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543. |
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Interview Summary dated Jul. 31, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,597. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,597. |
Non Final Office Action Dated Nov. 10, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Interview Summary, dated Feb. 17, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 13, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Interview Summary dated May 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Mendelson, et al., “Informatics in Radiology—Image Exchange: IHE and the Evolution of Image Sharing,” RadioGraphics, Nov.-Dec. 2008, vol. 28, No. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60867071 | Nov 2006 | US |