The field of technology generally relates to automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and, more particularly, to suspension systems for AGVs.
AGVs are used to haul relatively heavy payloads between locations in manufacturing facilities and may be designed to transport payloads that are several times their own weight. AGV drive systems are selected to provide sufficient power to move a particular size of payload while the size of the drive system is minimized to avoid extraneous weight and to increase energy efficiency by using as little power as possible to propel the AGV. AGV suspension systems are designed to ensure that the powered wheel(s) of the drive system maintain contact with the ground, particularly on uneven surfaces. For instance, when a powered wheel encounters a low spot along the ground, traction will be lost if only unpowered wheels are supporting the AGV away from the low spot. Some suspension systems include means for biasing the powered wheel toward the ground to maintain contact when such low spots are encountered. This can be problematic, however, when a powered wheel encounters a high spot, as the additional force applied by the biasing means can cause the powered wheel to be loaded beyond its capacity. This can lead to stalling or irreparable damage to the drive system. Complex and expensive biasing means must often be used to prevent overloading of the drive system.
Various embodiments of an automated guided vehicle (AGV) include a frame a drive-steer unit with a steerable drive wheel, a pair of casters, and a suspension system. The suspension system includes a rocker pivotally attached to the frame for movement about a pivot axis. The drive-steer unit is attached to the rocker on one side of the pivot axis, and the pair of casters is attached to the rocker on an opposite side of the pivot axis. The drive-steer unit and the pair of casters move together about the pivot axis in the same rotational direction when the rocker tilts about the pivot axis.
In various embodiments, the drive wheel is located along a longitudinal axis of the AGV, and each caster is longitudinally and transversely spaced from the drive wheel to establish three-point contact beneath the suspension system.
In various embodiments, the AGV includes an additional drive wheel and an additional pair of casters, and the suspension system includes an additional rocker pivotally attached to the frame for movement about a different pivot axis. The additional drive wheel and pair of casters are attached to the additional rocker to move together about the different pivot axis in the same rotational direction when the additional rocker tilts about the different pivot axis.
In various embodiments, each rocker of the AGV is configured to move independently from the other about respective pivot axes.
In various embodiments, each drive wheel of the AGV is located along a longitudinal axis of the AGV and each caster is longitudinally and transversely spaced from each drive wheel to establish three-point contact beneath each rocker.
In various embodiments, each drive wheel of the AGV is located longitudinally and transversely between casters of the AGV.
In various embodiments, each drive wheel of the AGV is steerable.
In various embodiments, the drive-steer unit and the pair of casters are rigidly mounted to the rocker such that there is no relative movement between the rocker and the drive-steer unit or between the rocker and the pair of casters about the pivot axis when the rocker tilts about the pivot axis.
In various embodiments, the drive wheel is steerable about a steering axis and each caster is configured to swivel about a respective swivel axis. The steering axis and the swivel axes remain parallel with each other when the rocker tilts about the pivot axis.
In various embodiments, the suspension system includes a retraction mechanism configured to tilt the rocker while the AGV is stationary such that the drive wheel is lifted away from the ground and only the casters support the weight of the AGV.
In various embodiments, a drive axis and a steering axis of the drive-steer unit intersect.
In various embodiments, a drive axis of the drive wheel is spaced from the pivot axis by a first distance, and a rolling axis of each caster is spaced from the pivot axis by a second distance different from the first distance, whereby a ratio of drive wheel load to the load on the pair of casters is inversely proportional to a ratio of the second distance to the first distance.
In various embodiments, the distance between a drive axis and the pivot axis is constant and the distance between a caster rolling axis and the pivot axis is a function of the direction of movement of the AGV along the ground.
In various embodiments, a load distribution between the drive wheel and the pair of casters is such that the drive wheel has sufficient traction with the ground to propel the AGV along the ground in an unloaded condition of the AGV and the drive wheel load is less than a rated load of the drive-steer unit in a maximum load condition of the AGV.
In various embodiments, the load distribution between the drive wheel and the pair of casters is constant as the AGV moves along the ground and the rocker tilts in response to uneven conditions along the ground.
In various embodiments, the suspension system does not rely on a biasing element to maintain traction between the drive wheel and the ground.
In various embodiments, an automated guided vehicle (AGV) includes a drive wheel and a pair of casters. The drive wheel is free to move about a pivot axis, and the pair of casters is configured to move about the pivot axis with the drive wheel. A steering axis of the drive wheel and swivel axes of the casters are on opposite sides of the pivot axis and tilt in the same direction as the AGV moves along uneven ground.
In various embodiments, the AGV includes a rocker which is free to move about the pivot axis. The drive wheel and the pair of casters are mounted to the rocker such that a distance between the steering axis and the swivel axes is constant.
In various embodiments, the drive wheel and the pair of casters are coupled with a frame of the AGV via a suspension system having a load distribution ratio between the drive wheel and the pair of casters that is inversely proportional to distances of their respective rolling axes from the pivot axis.
In various embodiments, the load distribution ratio is constant at any given position of the casters about the respective swivel axes.
It is contemplated than any of the above-listed features can be combined with any other feature or features of the above-described embodiments or the features described below and/or depicted in the drawings, except where there is an incompatibility of features.
As disclosed below, a freely pivoting AGV suspension system can be employed in an unexpectedly simple and elegant manner to ensure continuously sufficient traction between powered wheels and the ground while protecting the drive system from overload.
The frame 12 is a structural component that other AGV components are attached to and/or supported by and can be of any shape or size sufficient to bear the loads the AGV is intended to transport. In this case, the frame 12 provides and/or supports a flat platform onto which loads can be placed to be transported, or from which functional components such as equipment attachment mechanisms can extend. In the illustrated example, the frame 12 centrally houses or supports a housing for electronics associated with the AGV control system above the battery pack 20. Other AGV components attached to or supported by the illustrated frame 12 include the suspension system 18 and various guards, covers, user interface panels, and safety sensors.
With additional reference to the cutaway side view of
Each caster 16 includes an unpowered and free-rolling wheel in a caster frame. The casters 16 support at least a portion of the weight of the AGV 10 and its payload and may support all of the load when the drive wheels are retracted. Each caster wheel is free to rotate about a rolling axis 30, and each caster is free to swivel about a swivel axis 32. The center of each caster wheel is laterally offset from the corresponding swivel axis 32 so that when the AGV changes direction along the ground, the casters swivel to allow the AGV to roll in the direction the steerable drive wheels 22 move it. In this example, each swivel axis 32 is vertical, and each rolling axis 30 is horizontal.
In the illustrated example, both drive wheels 22 are located along a central longitudinal axis 34 of the AGV, and each caster 16 is longitudinally and transversely spaced from the drive wheels 22. A triangular relationship between each drive wheel 22 and an associated pair of casters 16 establishes three-point contact beneath the suspension system 18 at both opposite ends of the AGV 10. The casters 16 are arranged as the outermost wheels of the AGV 10, with the drive wheels 22 located between opposite pairs of casters. The illustrated configuration has a zero turning radius and can be translated and/or rotated along the ground in any orientation—i.e., there is no designated front or back of the AGV.
As shown in
Each drive-steer unit 26 and each pair of casters 16 are rigidly mounted to the corresponding rocker 36 such that there is no relative movement between the rocker and the drive-steer unit or between the rocker and the pair of casters about the pivot axis 38 when the rocker tilts about the pivot axis, as is the case when the AGV 10 moves over uneven ground as in
The effect of the rocker-based suspension system 18, in which the casters 16 freely pivot with the associated drive unit 26 and drive wheel 22, is that the load distribution among the drive wheels and caster wheels is essentially unchanged from the level ground of
The illustrated rocker suspension system 18 maintains an essentially constant load on the drive wheels 22 and casters 16 as the AGV moves in a particular direction along uneven ground. The only significant change in load distribution between the drive wheel 22 and casters 16 attached to the same rocker is when the AGV changes direction and the casters swivel in response. In
The illustrated example also includes a caster mounting plate 64, to which the pair of casters 16 is mounted and which couples the casters to the caster side 58 of the rocker 36. A drive retractor 66 may be mounted to the rocker 36 or mounting plate 64 on the caster side 58 of the rocker. First and second portions of the drive retractor are vertically adjustable relative to one another (e.g., via a threaded connection), with one portion fixed with respect to the AGV frame and the other portion fixed with respect to the rocker 36. When adjusted, the drive retractor 66 causes the rocker 36 to pivot about the pivot axis 38, with the casters 16 rotated downward and the drive unit 26 rotated upward. The drive wheel 22 can be lifted from the ground in this manner to allow the AGV to be towed or otherwise easily moved when not powered. Also illustrated in the example of
The rocker suspension system simplifies suspension design because the load on the drive wheels 22 does not change as the AGV traverses uneven terrain. With known AGV weight and payload, suspension design is a matter of ensuring the drive wheel has sufficient traction at the minimum load condition and that it is not overloaded at the maximum load condition. The amount of unevenness of the ground is not a factor. The amount of load on each drive wheel is a function of a simple ratio based on the relative spacing among the drive wheel, the casters of the same rocker, and the pivot axis of the rocker, as explained below.
The load distribution between the drive wheel and casters for each rocker thus depends on the direction of AGV travel, but it is constant for each set of casters and drive wheels while traveling in one direction. The wheel loads LD and LC are also related to the load LP at the pivot axis 38 by:
L
P
=L
D
+L
C. (2)
In the examples of
L
T
≤L
D
≤L
max (3)
where LT is the minimum load to maintain traction on the drive wheel when the AGV is unloaded and when the casters are swiveled toward the drive wheel, and Lmax is the maximum allowable load on the drive wheel—i.e., the rated load of the drive wheel as specified by the manufacturer. LT can be determined as:
where RR is the rolling resistance of the AGV and μS is the static coefficient of friction between the drive wheel and the ground. RR can be determined as:
where RC is the radius of the caster wheels, RD is the radius of the drive wheel, LC is the load on the caster wheels, and μR is the coefficient of rolling friction between the wheels and the ground. The minimum traction load LT is thus a function of the load LD on the drive wheel and the load LC on the pair of caster wheels. Each of the loads LD and LC can be calculated based on the relationships in equations (1) and (2), above. Iterative calculations can thus be performed to determine a sufficient load distribution that will satisfy equation (3) above to always have sufficient traction and to never exceed the rated load of the drive wheel.
In one non-limiting example based on
To determine the maximum load on the drive wheel with this configuration, the condition in
or 2141 lbs., which is below the 2200 lb. maximum load for the drive wheels. The load distribution of the rocker suspension system with these dimensions among the wheels and the pivot axis is therefore suitable to protect the drive system from excess loading.
To determine the minimum load on the drive wheel with this configuration, the condition in
To ensure this value for LD is sufficient to maintain traction, the minimum load required for traction at the drive wheel is calculated using equations (4) and (5). Assuming the wheels have a coefficient of rolling friction of 0.06, then RR=5.4 lbs. Substituting into equation (4) with a static friction coefficient of 0.5 gives LT=27 lbs. The minimum drive wheel load LD of 75 lbs. exceeds the minimum load LT required to maintain traction. Notably, these calculations are independent from the amount of unevenness along the ground. By its nature, the rocker suspension system ensures constant loading of the drive wheel as the AGV moves in any given direction. No spring or other biasing means is required to maintain traction.
It is to be understood that the foregoing is a description of one or more embodiments of the invention. The invention is not limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed herein, but rather is defined solely by the claims below. Furthermore, the statements contained in the foregoing description relate to particular embodiments and are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or on the definition of terms used in the claims, except where a term or phrase is expressly defined above. Various other embodiments and various changes and modifications to the disclosed embodiment(s) will become apparent to those skilled in the art. All such other embodiments, changes, and modifications are intended to come within the scope of the appended claims.
As used in this specification and claims, the terms “e.g.,” “for example,” “for instance,” “such as,” and “like,” and the verbs “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and their other verb forms, when used in conjunction with a listing of one or more components or other items, are each to be construed as open-ended, meaning that the listing is not to be considered as excluding other, additional components or items. Other terms are to be construed using their broadest reasonable meaning unless they are used in a context that requires a different interpretation.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62744829 | Oct 2018 | US |