The present invention relates generally to safety valves for segregating dairy milk lines from contamination by other fluids such as teat dips, and more particularly to safety valves with improved safety and monitoring features.
Dairy milking systems as they relate to the present invention include a cluster of teat cups, each of which is matched with a flexible teat cup liner that is attached to a teat of a dairy animal with a vacuum. Vacuum is applied in pulses between the shell and liner to facilitate movement of the flexible liner to milk the dairy animals. Milk flows from the dairy animal through each flexible liner and then through a milk tube to a milker unit collecting assembly, which collects milk from all of the animal's teats. This combination of elements is known as a milker unit and can be used to milk cows, sheep, goats and other dairy animals. Each milker unit is used to milk multiple animals so it must be sanitized, at least periodically, to prevent transmission of dirt and germs into the milk, and to help prevent transmission of diseases from animal to animal.
Milk from individual animals flows from each collecting assembly through milk tubes and into a milk line that receives milk from all of the milker units in the dairy. The milk is then chilled and stored in a milk tank. The milk lines and storage systems must not be contaminated with dirt, debris, chemicals, pathogens, or contaminated milk. In the event that milk being collected is from a sick dairy animal, or a monitoring system determines the milk is unsellable, the milk would be diverted to a “bad milk” line or a milk line for feeding to calves—a “calf milk” line.
Traditionally, dairy animal teats have been prepared for milking by cleaning the teats before milking using sanitizing teat dips, and protecting teats after milking by applying protective teat dips. These dips are broadly categorized as “pre-dips” and “post-dips.” Before automated systems were used, the pre-dips and post-dips were applied by dairy operators manually, with cloth wipes or specialized teat dip applicators. The teat dips were effective in cleaning and protecting teats from infection, but as automated milking systems came into commercial use, automated teat dip applicators were developed to realize the full benefit of automated milking.
Various types of automated (robotic) milking systems have been developed with automated systems for applying teat dip, air, and rinsing fluids (referred to herein as “teat dip fluids”) applied and rinsed from the system in a manner that protects milk lines, and the milk therein, from being contaminated. Protecting milk lines and milk is mandated in the United States Food and Drug Administration's Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (“PMO”), Item 14r., for example, as well as other regulatory agencies throughout the world.
To protect milk lines in the United States, they should be separated from potentially contaminating fluids using at least two automatically controlled valves or a double seat mixproof valve, with a drainable opening to the atmosphere between the valves or seats (PMO Item 14r.) This arrangement is referred to as “block-bleed-block,” and protects milk lines from contamination even when the valves or valve seats fail by draining fluid through the opening (bleed) rather than allowing it to pass through both valves or valve seats. Various embodiments of block-bleed-block valves and valve arrangements are known and operate effectively. See for example: U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,342,125; 9,510,556; and 9,686,958.
Milk line protection systems can be complicated because pre-dipping and post-dipping require that teat dipping fluids be delivered in precise dosages and in a timely fashion to provide proper teat treatment, system cleaning, system timing, and milk line protection. Dosage valves for teat dips measure proper dosage quantities of teat dips and ensure that the doses are delivered under pressure and timing. Air can be used to “chase” the teat dip. Following teat dip application, the delivery system must be sufficiently cleaned and rinsed with water or other rinsing fluid, to sanitize equipment before subsequent milkings.
Further complicating teat dip delivery systems is the requirement that the teat dip, air, and water provided from main source lines must be accurately divided and delivered to each teat of the dairy animal. Typically, dividing dosages of teat dip fluids is performed through a teat dip fluid manifold that receives the fluids from one or more main supply lines and then divides the fluids into individual delivery lines. Given the short time durations in which teat dip must pass through the teat dip fluid manifold, providing adequate milk line protections can be challenging.
Further complicating teat dip fluid delivery systems, is a desire to prevent cross-contamination of the various teat dip fluids. For example, water should not be allowed to contaminate teat dip before it is delivered to a teat because the dip can be diluted and possibly less effective. Conversely, teat dip should not be allowed to contaminate water and air lines, which could foul the system and require additional maintenance. Also, pre-dips should not be contaminated by post-dips, which could contain iodine or other antimicrobial composition.
Safety valves are known in a number of different configurations, including those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,342,125 and 9,686,958. These safety valves are reliable and work flawlessly. Nonetheless, teat dips and/or backflushing fluids can have an adverse effect on valve seals. In particular, valve seals exposed to some teat dips could deteriorate and require regular maintenance. Other valve seal materials can swell when exposed to teat dips. When seals of this type are used in shuttle valves or are otherwise expected to slide on a sealing surface, the seal can inhibit valve operation and even cause spool-type valves (or 2 position-5 way valves) to seize.
Valve seal orientations, such as in a stationary valve head seat, are not susceptible to valve seizures due to swelling because the valve head will still seal securely even on a swollen seal. Unfortunately, such valve configurations are more difficult and space-consuming to configure in a safety valve.
In addition, block-bleed-block valve configuration required by The Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (“PMO”) 14r.2.b.3. work effectively to “bleed” fluids that seep past one of the “block” valves, but the vent used to bleed leaked fluids are difficult to monitor. Consequently, leaking block valves in a safety valve can escape notice when maintenance is required.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved dairy system safety valve that requires reduced maintenance, is relatively compact, and can be readily monitored for possible leakage.
A valve assembly in accordance with the present invention includes: a conduit defining a flow path having a first end and a second end; a first valve having an open position and a closed position to close the first end of the flow path; a second valve having an open position and a closed position to close the second end of the flow path; a pressurized fluid source in fluid communication with the flow path when the first valve is closed and the second valve is closed; and a pressure monitor in communication with the flow path to determine fluid pressure in the flow path. This safety valve is an improvement over the prior block-bleed-block valve arrangements because the vent to atmosphere is replaced with an active pressurized zone in between two closed valves to define a beneficial arrangement of a block-monitor-block, the benefits of which include active valve monitoring, detection of valve leaks for improved and timely maintenance, and improved safety that forces pressurized gas upstream through a leaky upstream valve or downstream through a leaky downstream valve.
The valve assembly pressure monitor can generate data corresponding to fluid pressure in the flow path, and the data is compared to a predetermined fluid pressure. The pressure sensor can generate data corresponding to fluid pressure in the flow path, and the valve assembly can further include: a controller that compares the data to a predetermined flow channel pressure range and generates a signal if the data comparison indicates that the data is outside of the predetermined range.
The valve assembly first valve can be a two-position, three-way valve, and the second valve can be a two-position, three-way valve.
In an alternate embodiment, the first valve is a shuttle valve, and the second valve is a shuttle valve.
Further, the pressurized fluid source can communicate pressurized gas to the flow path when the first valve is in the closed position and the second valve is in the closed position.
The present safety valve invention is described and depicted herein for use in a teat dip fluid dispensing system. Nonetheless, the safety valve is intended to be used in a variety of dairy settings including, but not limited to, teat dip dispensing; milk lines handling good, bad, or calf milk; and any other situation where good milk lines are to be protected from contamination.
Other features and benefits of the invention will be apparent from the following Detailed Description of the Drawings.
In the following detailed description of the drawings, the same reference numeral may be used to designate the same or similar item in more than one figure. Also, the term “safety valve” may be used to designate an assemblage of valves or valve components, which may or may not be in a single valve housing. Individual safety valve components may also be referred to as “valves.”
Illustrated generally in
The automated dairy animal milking stall unit 30 includes: a frame 32 for mounting in or adjacent to a milking stall; a milker unit 34 mounted in the frame 32; milk lines 36 as part of the milker unit 34; milker arm controls 35 used to control movement of the milker unit 34 between a parked position (shown) and a milking position (not shown); and a teat dip fluid supply system 38. Further, the frame 32 carries a milking module 42 for determining whether to direct milk to a “good milk” path, a “bad milk” path, or a “calf milk” path, for example. Also included, is a dipping module 43 that is programmed to monitor and control teat dipping, rinsing, and backflushing. The milking module 42 and the dipping module 43 are in communication with each other and coordinated by a programmable stall control 44, preferably concealed in an upper portion of the frame 32. It is preferred that all of the components described above be disposed in a single frame 32, but multiple frames or mounting systems can be used, so long as the teat dip fluid supply system 38 is in fluid communication with the milker unit 34 or at least a teat dip delivery unit for delivering pre-dip, post-dip, or both types of dip to a dairy animal's teats that will be milked using the milker unit 34.
The frame 32 can be open or enclosed or at least partially enclosed to protect the teat dip supply system 38, the milker unit control mechanism 42, and the programmable stall control 44 from the harsh dairy environment and from being damaged by dairy animals.
The milker unit 34 can be of any suitable design and preferably includes teat cups and liner combinations 46, each of which receives an animal teat for milking. Generally, milk travels from the liner through the milk lines 36 and downstream to suitable chilling and storage systems.
Preferably, the milker unit 34 also carries one or more hoses and teat dip delivery nozzles or openings to direct teat dip toward each animal teat. Also, preferably, the teat dip delivery nozzles or openings are formed in a teat cup liner, examples of such liners are disclosed in Torgerson et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,991,335, but other types of dispensers and/or liners can be used with the present invention.
To receive teat dip fluids such as teat dip, air, and rinsing fluids from appropriate sources and delivering them to individual dairy animal teats, the present invention includes at least one teat dip fluid manifold 50, and the embodiment depicted in
As used herein “teat dip fluids” can include teat dip for being applied before (“pre”) or after (“post”) milking, as well as, air to force teat dip through delivery lines, and rinsing fluids, such as water, for rinsing the teat dip fluid manifold, valves, delivery lines, and teat dip openings or nozzles. It is not necessary that all of these teat dip fluids be utilized in a single manifold 50, 52, but the present invention can be used to deliver one or more of these fluids effectively, efficiently, and reliably. Suitable manifolds are disclosed in a patent application entitled “Automated Teat Dip Fluid Manifold” filed on Nov. 3, 2017, and naming inventors Matthew J. Stuessel, Wolfgang Schulze-Wilmert, and Thomas Orban, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The first teat dip fluid manifold 50 and the second teat dip fluid manifold 52 can each have substantially the same construction or any other suitable construction in accordance with the present invention. The teat dip fluid manifold 50 includes a housing 54, a teat dip supply line 56 (a teat dip supply line 58 is shown for the second teat dip manifold 52), an air supply line 60, and a rinsing fluid supply line 62. Fewer or other fluids can also be supplied to the teat dip fluid manifold 50, if desired. Further, if only a single teat dip manifold 50 is used, the teat dip supply line 56 could be divided into two teat dip supply lines with corresponding inlets, so that one receives pre-dip and the other receives post-dip.
Generally, the manifolds 50 and 52 inlets for air and rinsing fluids are controlled by valves 76. Teat dip, air, and rinsing fluids are dispensed using an upstream valve (inside the housing 54) and a downstream valve 99, as seen in
Once the fluids are dispensed through the manifolds 50/52, they are delivered to individual delivery lines 68 and then to appropriate nozzles in the teat cup liners. Safety valves 100 in accordance with the present invention are used to protect the milker units 34 and downstream milk lines from contamination by teat dip fluids during the milking process.
In between the inlet 106 and the outlet 108, is the vent 110, which together form a “block-bleed-block” arrangement to protect downstream milk lines from upstream teat dip fluids. The 2 position-3 way style valve is desirable, because it preferably uses valve seats on which valve heads bear when in the closed position, as opposed to seals in a spool valve which must slide and can be subject to swelling and seizure after extended exposure to teat dip. Nonetheless, under appropriate circumstances, spool valves and other types of valves can be used. An actuator 113 is used to move the valve 100 between a closed position with the vent 110 open and an open position with the inlet 106 in fluid communication with the outlet 108 and the vent 110 closed. Actuators 113 in accordance with the present invention can be any desired type, including springs, solenoid valves, or other passive, active, automated, or manual actuators.
In the embodiment illustrated in
The bias in the first shuttle valve 120 preferably is set at less than the hydraulic or pneumatic pressures of any of the teat dip fluids being dispensed through the safety valve 100, so that the fluid pressure itself is sufficient to actuate or open the first shuttle valve 120 for fluid flow and to close the vent 126 so that fluid does not drain out through the vent 126 while passing downstream. Flow in the opposite direction, (from the outlet 124 and toward the inlet 122) is not possible because the fluid would apply pressure against the shuttle 128 and toward the inlet 122 to maintain the inlet 122 in a closed position. Consequently, any such flow would drain from the shuttle valve 100 through the vent 126 instead of flowing farther upstream.
The position of the shuttle 128 is monitored with a first position sensor 131. Should the valve position sensor 131 sense a shuttle 128 out of position for any given procedure, a corresponding signal can be generated and transmitted to one of the controllers 43 or 44, for example, to further generate a warning and/or stop milking operations at that stall or divert milk to a “bad milk” line, as examples.
The shuttle valve outlet 124 is in fluid communication with a second conduit 129, which in turn is in fluid communication with a second shuttle valve 130 having an inlet 132, an outlet 134, and a vent 136. A shuttle 138 moves between a biased closed position to close the inlet 132 and an open position to open the inlet 132 and close the vent 136. The position of the second shuttle valve 138 is preferably actively monitored by a second position sensor 141, in the same manner described above.
As with the first shuttle valve 120, the second shuttle valve 130 has its bias set at less than the hydraulic or pneumatic pressures of the teat dip fluids, so that only the fluid pressure is necessary to move the second shuttle valve 130 from the closed position to the open position. Also, fluid flow in the opposite direction is not possible because reverse fluid pressure would simply maintain the second shuttle valve 130 in the closed position, and instead the fluid would safely drain out of the vent 136.
With this arrangement of the upstream valve 102, the first shuttle valve 120, and the second shuttle valve 130, one-directional flow through the safety valve 100 is ensured and any possible backflow is safely drained out of the vent 136 and/or the vent 126 (or even the vent 110 in the upstream valve 102) instead of flowing back downstream to the teat cup liner where contamination could occur.
Beginning with
After milking, when it is desired to apply teat dip fluids, the safety valve 100 begins to open, as illustrated in
As the teat dip fluids pass through the first conduit 116, they eventually reach and open the first shuttle valve 120, as depicted in
After the teat dip fluid has passed through the safety valve 100, additional teat dip fluids can be received from the manifold 50/52, either continuously, or sequentially with any desired intervals in between each teat dip fluid. The teat dip fluids can be related to a pre-dip teat dip fluid or a post-dip teat dip fluid. Operation of the safety valve 100 will be essentially the same for all fluids.
After completion of the teat dip application and any desired rinsing, the safety valve 100 returns to the milking position by closing the upstream valve 102 to prevent the flow of teat dip fluids. As a result, the first shuttle valve 120 closes first, as seen in
The upstream valve 204, the downstream valve 208, and the pneumatic pressure valve 212 are preferably all normally closed, 2 position-2 way valves, which are relatively inexpensive to maintain and avoid the use of spools and related seals that can swell and even seize up after prolonged exposure to teat dips. Nonetheless, other valve types can be used, including 2 position-3 way valves, which can be easier to flush and less likely to be fouled by teat dip because they permit rinsing fluids to reach enclosed portions of a fluid flow path.
All of these valves 204, 208, and 212 are controlled by actuators 218. As stated above, “actuators” is used herein to designate any type of valve actuator, including manual and automated, such as a solenoid valve. Preferably, the actuators 218 used with this invention are automated and remotely controlled by the controller 43.
Teat dip fluids flow from the teat dip fluid manifold 50/52 and the delivery line 68, and into the upstream valve 204, through the galley 206, and out of the downstream valve 208 when the upstream valve 204 and the downstream valve 208 have been actuated into an open position. After these valves 204/208 close, the pneumatic pressure valve 212 opens briefly to permit pressurized gas from a supply line 213, preferably air but other fluids, gases, and vapors could be used, to enter the galley 206 until the galley 206 pressure reaches a predetermined level, preferably about 80 pounds per square inch (“psi”), but other pressures can be used as well. When desired galley 206 pressure is reached, the pneumatic valve 212 closes. With all these valves 204, 208, and 218 closed, pressure in the galley 206 should remain relatively constant unless there is a leak in one of the valves. A leak would be detectable by the pressure monitor 216, which can be a pressure switch or any other type of pressure gauge or monitoring device that monitors a predetermined pressure or pressure range. A falling pressure or a fluctuating pressure that is above or below a predetermined value range can be used that indicates that the pressurized gas is leaking out one of the valves 204 or 208 or another location. Pressure drop rates could also be detected to indicate the magnitude of the leak, which is beneficial in determining a corrective course of action.
An abnormal galley pressure would cause the pressure monitor 216 to generate and transmit a signal either wirelessly or through an appropriate hard wire connector 221 to any suitable device that would alert a dairy operator that valve maintenance is required. Such “active” monitoring provides improved monitoring capabilities over a “passive” block-bleed-block safety valve that simply vents or “bleeds” leaked fluids out of a vent between valves. Thus, the present active safety valve can be referred to as a “block-monitor-block” safety valve for improved monitoring and safety.
One additional benefit of using pressurized gas in the galley 206, is that if there is a leak, the pressurized gas will seep through a leaky upstream valve 204 in a direction opposite the milk lines, and thus provide improved milk line protection. If the downstream valve 208 is leaking, then only the gas (again preferably air) will reach the milk line and no teat dipping fluids will reach the milk lines. Thus, a pressurized and monitored galley 206 provides excellent milk line protection in an automated dairy milker unit, and can be used in any dairy apparatus where milk lines require protection from other fluids.
One further function of a pressure monitor 216 for monitoring the galley 206, can be achieved when milking and dipping operations are not taking place. During these “down” times, the upstream valve 204 and the downstream valve 208 can be closed, and the pneumatic valve 212 can be opened. If the pressure monitor 216 is unable to detect an adequate or predetermined pressure range, it would indicate that the pneumatic valve 212 or a source for pressurized air is not functioning properly.
Thus, all of the embodiments of the present invention can be used to: monitor galley pressure and determine if there are leaky valves; help maintain upstream valves in a closed position; prevent contaminating fluids from flowing through the safety valve; force air through leaky valves in the opposite direction that contaminating fluids might otherwise flow; and test air pressure sources and the pneumatic pressure valve. Any failures of the safety valve of the present invention in these areas would be detected by the pressure monitor to generate a warning signal that maintenance is necessary and/or that milk being harvested through a failing safety valve should be diverted to a “bad milk” line or “calf milk” line, instead of a “good milk” line.
In this embodiment the upstream valve 304 is a solenoid-operated 2 way-2 position valve, with an inlet 320 and an outlet 322. The downstream valve 308 is illustrated as a 2 position-3 way valve with an inlet 324 that is normally closed to the galley 306, and an outlet 326 that is normally open to a vent 328 to atmosphere. The pneumatic pressure valve 312 is as described above for other embodiments and receives pressurized gas, such as air, from a source line 313, preferably at a pressure of about 80 pounds per square inch (psi). The valves 304, 308, and 312 are all controlled by actuators 318. The pressure valve 312 allows pressurized gas (air) into the galley 306 when both the upstream valve 304 and the downstream valve 308 are closed. The pressure monitor 316 senses whether the pressure in the galley 306 is within or outside of acceptable ranges, and generates signals, accordingly. This is the arrangement illustrated in
When teat dip fluids are supplied, both the upstream valve 304 and the downstream valve 308 are opened, and fluids can flow through. Pressurized air from the pressure valve 312 is not supplied at this time so that it does not interfere with fluid flow.
In this embodiment, the upstream valve 404 is preferably a check valve to prevent reverse flow through the safety valve 400. The downstream valve 408 is illustrated as a 2 position-3 way valve with an inlet 424 that is normally closed to the galley 406, and an outlet 426 that is normally open to a vent 428 to atmosphere, so that any reverse fluid flow will drain through the vent 428 before it reaches the inlet 424. The upstream valve 404 is a check valve opened by fluid pressure, but only when dip fluids are supplied by the manifold 50/52. The downstream valve 408 acts as an active block to any downstream flow through the safety valve 400. The pneumatic pressure valve 412 is as described above for other embodiments, and receives pressurized gas, such as air, from a source line 414, preferably at a pressure of about 80 pounds per square inch (psi) to pressurize the galley 406 when the downstream valve 408 is closed and no fluid is opening the upstream valve 404. The pressure sensor 416 acts as described above.
For example, in the initial position illustrated in
Specifically, the inlet valves 504A and 504B (illustrated as check valves) are closed, the outlet valves 508A and 508B are closed, the pneumatic valves 512A and 512B are open to allow pressurized air from gas supply line 513 into the respective galleys 506A and 506B (preferably at about 80 pounds per square inch “psi”), which are monitored by pressure monitors 516A and 516B, respectively. The ventilation valves (or port in a valve) 514 and 530 are opened to provide vents or bleeds in this block-bleed-block arrangement.
On the post-dip portion 502B, the pneumatic valve 512B is closed, the galley 506B is vented out of the downstream valve 508B and post-dipping teat dip fluids can pass through the upstream valve 504B, the galley 506B, the downstream valve 508B and on to the teat dip delivery tube. After post-dipping, the safety valve 500 returns to the valve positions depicted in
In this
In this
In this embodiment, the pneumatic valve 812 is a 2 position-3 way valve that defines an inlet 817 for pressurized air, and a monitoring port 818 through which the pressure monitor 816 can monitor galley pressure when the pneumatic valve 812 inlet 817 is closed. This arrangement protects the pressure monitor 816 from damage from other fluids and pressure fluctuations when the pneumatic valve 812 is opened to a pressurized source of air. Otherwise, this safety valve 800 operates as others described herein.
In this embodiment, the post-dip teat dipping portion is on the left side of the figure. The dip fluid line 68 leads from the manifold 50/52 to an upstream check valve 902, a galley 906, a downstream valve 908, a pneumatic pressure valve 910, and a pressure monitor 912. The upstream valve 902 and the downstream valve 908, when closed form a pair of blocks separated by the pressurized galley 906 to form a block-monitor-block arrangement in accordance with the present invention, and similar to embodiments described above. Preferably, dip is supplied through the dip fluid line 68 at a maximum of about 60 pounds per square inch (psi), and pressurized air is supplied through the line 913 at about 80 psi, but other relative pressures can be used.
Similarly, the pre-dip dipping portion 900A (right side) includes a supply line 68 to an upstream check valve 930, a galley 932, a downstream valve 934, a pneumatic valve 936, and a pressure monitor 938. A source of pressurized air 940 and line 913 are used to pressurize both galleys 906 and 932 when their respective pneumatic valves 910 and 936 are switched to open an appropriate port.
If the post-dip portion 900B and the pre-dip portion 900A of this safety valve 900 were simply connected at their downstream valves 908 and 934, respectively, to a common delivery line 68 downstream of the safety valve 900, then at least a pair of check valves would be required at the outlets 935 and 961 of each downstream valve 908 and 934 to prevent cross contamination of the two halves of the safety valve 900. To avoid including the extra check valves, the present embodiment utilizes a pre-dip outlet tube 946 from the downstream valve 934 of the pre-dip portion and routes it through a port 948 in the downstream valve 908 of the post-dip portion of the safety valve 900. The downstream valve 908 can then be switched to receive pre-dip from the pre-dip outlet tube 946, or switched to receive post-dip from the galley 906 on the post-dip side of the safety valve 900. This downstream valve 908 is preferably a 2 position-3 way valve and, as such, it obviates the need for check valves in protecting the two safety valve portions from cross-contamination.
As illustrated in
Similarly, on the pre-dip side 900A, the upstream valve 930 preferably is a check valve, the downstream valve 934 is a 2 position-3 way valve, and the pneumatic valve 936 is a 2 position-2 way valve.
Step 1 illustrated in
In step 2, a “Pre-Dip Process State,” as illustrated in
Pre-dip enters the pre-dip upstream valve 930 inlet 931 and through the galley 932 and into the pre-dip downstream valve 934 inlet 933 and out of the pre-dip downstream valve outlet 935. The outlet 935 can have any suitable fittings or couplings necessary to connect downstream components. A dashed line 937 illustrates the flow path of pre-dip. When the pre-dip downstream valve 934 is open, the pre-dip flows through the outlet tube 946 and into the post-dip downstream valve through a secondary inlet 948 in the post-dip downstream valve 908 and then exits a common outlet 961 to delivery line 68. So, even in its “closed” position, pre-dip is able to flow through the second inlet 948 and out of the outlet 961.
In step 3, a “Post-Dip Process State” illustrated in
On the post-dip side 900B, the upstream check valve 902 is open by pressure from the fluid entering the inlet 903 and flowing through the galley 906 to the open downstream valve 908 inlet 907. The pneumatic pressure valve 910 is closed. Post-dip can, therefore, pass through the post-dip side of the safety valve 900B by flowing into the inlet 903 of the upstream valve 902, the galley 906, and into the opened post-dip inlet 907 and out of the common outlet 961. Thus, the benefits of using a common valve outlet 961 are achieved.
Power to all of the valves is provided in any suitable manner, including wires 917.
Illustrated in
The inlet 1004 can be sized to connect to any upstream supply tube and can have a filter or other line protection device incorporated in it. The inlet also includes an appropriate coupling 1050 with a gasket for sealing the connection.
The bore 1006 can be any diameter or shape to accommodate the type of fluids that will be controlled by the safety valve 1000.
At the lower end of the bore 1006 is the first upstream valve 1010, which is essentially a 2 position-3 way valve having a plunger 1060 that is biased by a spring (not illustrated) toward a closed (upward as viewed in the figures) position. The plunger 1060 is spool-shaped and slides in a chamber 1062 in response to an actuator 1063, which is a solenoid valve in this case. The chamber 1062 has a vent 1064 beneath the plunger 1060 and a fluid outlet 1066 in fluid communication with the chamber 1062.
The vent 1064 is normally opened because the spool 1060 is normally closed. When the spool 1060 moves downward from the force of the actuator 1063, the spool 1060 contacts a seal 1070 in the bottom of the chamber 1062 to seal the vent 1064. In this position, the outlet 1066 is opened to the chamber 1062 in the area of the recessed portion of the spool 1060, which allows fluid to flow from the bore 1006, into the chamber 1062, around the spool-shaped plunger 1060, and out of the outlet 1066.
From the outlet 1066, fluid flows to the second bore 1012, which is appropriately sized and shaped, and channels the fluid to the first shuttle valve 1014, which includes a plunger 1100 that is spring-biased (spring not illustrated) to a closed position (to the right as illustrated) and will slide to the left as a result of fluid pressure in the second bore 1012. Appropriate seals are provided so that fluid cannot flow around the plunger 1100. To the left of the plunger 1100, is a vent 1116 that is open to atmosphere so there is little back pressure on the plunger 1100, so that fluid pressure can readily move the plunger to an opened position (to the left).
The position sensor 1030 senses whether the plunger 1100 is closed (all the way to the right, as illustrated) or opened. The “open” position sensed by the position sensor 1030 is not actually fully open, but regulatory requirements mandate that the sensor indicate the valve is open even before the plunger has opened a fluid flow path. Thus, the position sensor 1030 indicates an “open” valve despite the need for the plunger 1100 to move another 8 mm (0.030″) before a flow path is opened.
The valve progression of the shuttle valve 1000 begins with the
Once the plunger 1100 has moved even further to the left and sealed the vent 1116, the valve is in a true open position (
The position sensor 1030 senses whether the plunger 1100 is closed (all the way to the right, as illustrated) or opened. The “open” position sensed by the position sensor 1030 is not actually fully open, but regulatory requirements mandate that the sensor indicate the valve is open even before the plunger has opened a fluid flow path. Thus, the position sensor 1030 indicates an “open” valve despite the need for the plunger 1100 to move another 8 mm (0.030″) before a flow path is opened.
The second spool valve 1020 remains in its closed position because fluid pressure has not yet reached the plunger 1160.
In
Fluid pressure in the third conduit 1018 has begun to open the second shuttle valve 1020 by moving the plunger 1160 toward an open position (upward). The second position sensor 1032 indicates that the plunger 1160 is open even though there remains another 8 mm (0.030″) of travel for the plunger 1160 before it is truly open to allow fluid to pass.
Although not illustrated, when the first shuttle valve plunger 1100 closes, it cuts off fluid flow (and the related fluid pressure) in the third conduit 1018, so the second shuttle valve plunger 1160 will then begin to close as a result of its spring-bias toward a closed position. Thus, the safety valve 1000 returns to its position as seen in
As seen above in
Also in the above embodiments, the pre-dip valve 900A and the post-dip valve 900B are either formed in the same housing or are formed in separate housings that are joined together. In the embodiment illustrated in
When arrayed in this configuration, each pre-dip safety valve 900A is in communication with a corresponding post-dip safety valve 900B via a conduit 946. In a preferred arrangement, the first pre-dip valve 900A on the left end is in fluid communication with the first post-dip safety valve 900B, which is the fifth safety valve from the left end of the array. These two safety valves serve one of the four teat cups in a milker unit.
Next in line, the second pre-dip valve 900A from the left end is in fluid communication with the second post-dip safety valve 900B, which is the sixth safety valve from the left end of the valve array 913, and so on, so that spaced apart combinations of safety valves 900A and 900B continue through the valve array 913 resulting in four pairs of safety valves (one for each of the four teat cups) to deliver both pre-dip and post-dip to each teat cup.
In the case of a post-dip safety valve 900B in an “open” dipping position, the post-dip simply passes through the first inlet 907 of the downstream valve 908 and through the common outlet 961 to be delivered to the teat cup in line 68.
The foregoing detailed description is included for clearness of understanding only, and no unnecessary limitations therefrom should be read into the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/179,660 filed Nov. 2, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 62/581,514 filed Nov. 3, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Application 62/581,526, filed Nov. 3, 2017, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1365665 | Davies | Jan 1921 | A |
2012031 | Woodruff | Aug 1935 | A |
2532088 | Cordis | Nov 1950 | A |
2747544 | Thomas | May 1956 | A |
3014455 | Olander | Dec 1961 | A |
3099246 | Beskow | Jul 1963 | A |
3119401 | Merritt et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3285297 | Duft et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3417763 | Fjermestad et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3461845 | Peterson | Aug 1969 | A |
3474760 | Siddall et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3482547 | Maier | Dec 1969 | A |
3500839 | Bender | Mar 1970 | A |
3630081 | Nelson | Dec 1971 | A |
3648696 | Keith | Mar 1972 | A |
3688783 | Owens | Sep 1972 | A |
3696790 | Albright | Oct 1972 | A |
3713423 | Sparr, Sr. | Jan 1973 | A |
3726253 | Duncan | Apr 1973 | A |
3762371 | Quayle et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3789798 | Reisgies et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3797525 | Lieser | Mar 1974 | A |
3861335 | Przewalski | Jan 1975 | A |
3861355 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3957018 | Barrett | May 1976 | A |
3971512 | Duncan | Jul 1976 | A |
3973520 | Flocchini | Aug 1976 | A |
3989009 | Robar et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4034714 | Umbaugh et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4061504 | Zall et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4149489 | Umbaugh et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4168677 | Brown | Sep 1979 | A |
4175514 | Souza et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4177760 | Slater | Dec 1979 | A |
4222346 | Reisgies | Sep 1980 | A |
4253421 | Slater et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4254754 | Takada et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4295490 | Boudreau | Oct 1981 | A |
4305346 | Sparr, Sr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4332215 | Larson | Jun 1982 | A |
4333387 | Seitz | Jun 1982 | A |
4333421 | Schluckbier | Jun 1982 | A |
4344385 | Swanson et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4372345 | Mehus | Feb 1983 | A |
4378757 | Hamann | Apr 1983 | A |
4393811 | Bodmin | Jul 1983 | A |
4395971 | Happel et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4403568 | Fukuhara et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4403569 | Bennett | Sep 1983 | A |
4459938 | Noorlander | Jul 1984 | A |
4462425 | Mehus | Jul 1984 | A |
4485762 | Sutton et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4498419 | Flocchini | Feb 1985 | A |
4516530 | Reisgies et al. | May 1985 | A |
4572105 | Chowdhury et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4586462 | Icking | May 1986 | A |
4593649 | Britten | Jun 1986 | A |
4903639 | Kessel | Feb 1990 | A |
4907535 | Matsuzawa et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924809 | Verbrugge | May 1990 | A |
4936254 | Marshall | Jun 1990 | A |
5052341 | Woolford et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5101770 | Stevenson | Apr 1992 | A |
5134967 | Marshall | Aug 1992 | A |
5161482 | Griffin | Nov 1992 | A |
5166313 | Archibald et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167201 | Peles | Dec 1992 | A |
5178095 | Mein | Jan 1993 | A |
5218924 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5255628 | Kristoffer | Oct 1993 | A |
5379722 | Larson | Jan 1995 | A |
5386799 | Dietrich | Feb 1995 | A |
5390627 | Van Der Berg et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403005 | Avila-Valdez | Apr 1995 | A |
5493995 | Chowdhury | Feb 1996 | A |
5568788 | Van Den Berg et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572947 | Larson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5673650 | Mottram et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697325 | Gehm et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722343 | Aurik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5769025 | Van Der Lely et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778820 | Van Der Lely et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5850845 | Pareira et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5881669 | Van Den Berg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896828 | Kronschnabel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909716 | Van Der Lely | Jun 1999 | A |
5934220 | Hall et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957081 | Van Der Lely et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960736 | Ludington et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992347 | Innings et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009833 | Van Der Lely | Jan 2000 | A |
6079359 | Van Den Berg | Jun 2000 | A |
6089242 | Buck | Jul 2000 | A |
6098570 | Aurik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6202593 | Maier et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234110 | Xavier | May 2001 | B1 |
6244215 | Oosterling | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267077 | Van Den Berg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276297 | Van Den Berg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308655 | Oosterling | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318299 | Birk | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321682 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6367416 | Van Der Lely | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371046 | Petterson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435132 | Milbrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6546893 | Happel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550420 | Bjork | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561126 | Forsen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6584930 | Buecker | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591784 | Eriksson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598560 | Van Den Berg | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6619227 | Berger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626130 | Eriksson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644240 | Dietrich | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6752102 | Dahl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755153 | Chowdhury | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6935270 | Wipperfurth et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6997135 | Dewaard | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6997136 | Coates | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7036981 | Veenstra et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128020 | Björk et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143718 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162970 | Maier, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174848 | Brown et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178480 | Dahl et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7237694 | Freudinger | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263948 | Ericsson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281493 | Dietrich | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290497 | Rottier et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299766 | Van Den Berg | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7350478 | Fernandez | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377232 | Holmgren et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7401573 | Torgerson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412943 | Ericsson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7484474 | Van Den Berg et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7536975 | Denes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7575022 | Higgins | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578260 | Shin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7707966 | Torgerson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7765951 | Dietrich | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793614 | Ericsson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7926449 | Stellnert et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963249 | Duke | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8025029 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8033247 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8117989 | Torgerson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8210123 | Duke | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240272 | Duke | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8342125 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8468970 | Sandberg | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8590486 | Torgerson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8677937 | Shin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8770146 | Buck et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8925483 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8991335 | Torgerson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9016238 | Duke | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9049835 | Duke | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072272 | Bosma | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9072273 | Torgerson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9332726 | Bosma | May 2016 | B2 |
9468189 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9468190 | Duke | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9510556 | Torgerson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526224 | Balkenhol et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9545079 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9686958 | Sellner | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9763421 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9770006 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9883652 | Torgerson et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9930862 | Torgerson et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10123506 | Bosma | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10426128 | Balkenhol et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10499610 | Torgerson et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10502330 | Balkenhol | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10514316 | Enickl | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10681895 | Sellner et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020185071 | Guo | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030226520 | Dietrich | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040089242 | Verstege et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040231603 | Bjork et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050274327 | Johnsson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016399 | Torgerson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060037542 | Denes et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049212 | Freudinger | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060112887 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070070803 | Urquhart | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157887 | Fernandez | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186860 | Dietrich | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215053 | Duke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070277737 | Maier et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022932 | Rottier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080202433 | Duke | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276871 | Auburger et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314322 | Stellnert et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090050061 | Duke | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050062 | Auburger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064937 | Rottier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090151641 | Schulze Wartenhorst et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165724 | Mader et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090320760 | Torgerson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100132626 | Torgerson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154900 | Torgerson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100236487 | Stellnert et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100326360 | Duke et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110220028 | Duke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110220160 | Bosma | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232575 | Duke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120017836 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120111275 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118237 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118238 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120272911 | Duke | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130199449 | Daniel | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140283751 | Buck et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150173320 | Balkenhol et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150201577 | Duke | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150260302 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160319947 | Balkenhol | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170014837 | Duke | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170164576 | Balkenhol et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170359995 | Sellner et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180064056 | Torgerson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180220616 | Torgerson et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180235173 | Torgerson et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190133067 | Stuessel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190133069 | Stuessel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190145531 | Balkenhol et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200088310 | Balkenhol | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200352129 | Torgerson et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
641229 | Sep 1993 | AU |
2013294747 | Nov 2016 | AU |
2015227478 | Jun 2018 | AU |
1306389 | Dec 1999 | CN |
1801758 | Jun 1970 | DE |
1582939 | Jul 1970 | DE |
2622794 | Dec 1977 | DE |
3540058 | May 1987 | DE |
261300 | Oct 1988 | DE |
4006785 | Sep 1990 | DE |
10160161 | Jun 2003 | DE |
102013114595 | Jun 2015 | DE |
0277396 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0313109 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0319523 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0332235 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0459817 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0479397 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0527509 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0543463 | May 1993 | EP |
0583166 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0630557 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0728412 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0801893 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0945057 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1001199 | May 2000 | EP |
1328148 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1219167 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1222853 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1089615 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1520469 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1543720 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2625953 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1790217 | May 2007 | EP |
1795069 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1679956 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2113169 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1933616 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2277373 | Jan 2011 | EP |
1737291 | Nov 2013 | EP |
918766 | Feb 1963 | GB |
1160900 | Aug 1969 | GB |
1440901 | Jun 1976 | GB |
0324647.7 | Oct 2003 | GB |
0402119.2 | Jan 2004 | GB |
0408968.6 | Apr 2004 | GB |
0417392.8 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2002345955 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002354958 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2005192404 | Jul 2005 | JP |
1016237 | Mar 2002 | NL |
1021950 | May 2004 | NL |
1076036 | Feb 1984 | SU |
1273143 | Nov 1986 | SU |
1676538 | Sep 1991 | SU |
199313651 | Jul 1993 | WO |
199828969 | Jul 1998 | WO |
199927775 | Jun 1999 | WO |
199946978 | Sep 1999 | WO |
199966767 | Dec 1999 | WO |
199966787 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0117337 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0117338 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0207506 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0223976 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03030630 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03077645 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03098998 | Dec 2003 | WO |
04032608 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004030445 | Apr 2004 | WO |
05022986 | Mar 2005 | WO |
05043986 | May 2005 | WO |
05072516 | Aug 2005 | WO |
05102035 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006029797 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006091710 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006110079 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006117019 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006135917 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007031783 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007129884 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007129888 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008102567 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008138862 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009077607 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009158000 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010053577 | May 2010 | WO |
201128292 | Mar 2011 | WO |
201128293 | Mar 2011 | WO |
201128294 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011102911 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2014016588 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015118336 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015145116 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015150807 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2017191057 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2019090044 | May 2019 | WO |
2019090136 | May 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Grade A pasteurized milk ordinance” 2003 Revision; US Department Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; Food and Drug Administration. |
“3-A® Accepted Practices for Permanently Installed Product and Solution Pipelines and Cleaning Systems Used in Milk and Milk Product Processing Plants, No. 605-04,” Section N; Aug. 20, 1994. |
Akam, D.N., “The Development of Equipment for the Mechanization of Manual Operations in Milking Machine,” 17th Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Counsel, Inc., Feb. 21-23, 1978, pp. 417-426. |
Grindal; et al., “Automatic application of teat disinfectant through the milking machine cluster” Journal of Dairy Research, 56:579-585 (1989). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2011/00322, dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Letter to Alex Ferguson from Jeffry W. Smith dated Dec. 22, 2006, 2pp. |
Neijenhuis; et al., “Health of dairy cows milked by an automatic milking system; Effects of milking interval on teat condition and milking performance with whole-udder take off”, Oct. 2003, 23 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744 dated Jun. 3, 2010, 8pp. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2020 for European Application No. 19204875.9, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/059041, dated May 5, 2020, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/058897, dated May 5, 2020, 10 pages. |
Mar. 20, 2020 Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2018211343, 7 pages. |
Oct. 15, 2020 Communiation Regarding Oral Proceedings in Opposition to EP Patent 1737291, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,996 dated Jun. 24, 2021. |
Sep. 30, 2021 Minutes of the Oral Proceedings in Opposition to EP Patent 1737291, 4 pages. |
Oct. 20, 2021 Communication regarding Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC in EP Application 21183677.0, 3 pages. |
Dec. 17, 2021 Response to Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC in EP Application 21183677.0, 4 pages. |
Feb. 4, 2019 Reply to Grounds for Appeal, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 32 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2022 in related/corresponding RU Application No. 2020115226. |
European Search Report dated Oct. 13, 2017, for European Application No. 17171229.2, 6 pages. |
Mar. 13, 2018 Letter from the Proprietor, An Udder IP Company Ltd, Regarding the Opposition Procedure for Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 23 pages. |
May 17, 2018 EPO Communication; Details and minutes of the oral proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 9 pages. |
May 31, 2018 Interlocutory Decision in Opposition Proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 49 pages. |
Sep. 27, 2018 Statement of Grounds for Appeal, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 29 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2017/060232, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 2 pages. |
German Search Report for DE Application No. 10 2016 108 300.3, dated Mar. 10, 2017, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/652,372 dated Feb. 11, 2008, 14pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/662,454 dated Aug. 16, 2010, 20 pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,769 dated Feb. 20, 2008, 9pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/712,787 dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
PCT/GB04/004343—Written Opinion of ISA & IPRP dated Feb. 3, 2005, 5pp. |
“PCT/US06/023075—ISR & Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2006”. |
PCT/US09/006026—IPRP, Written Opinion of ISA & ISR dated Mar. 6, 2010, 9pp. |
“PCT/US09/03770—IPRP and Written Opinion dated Jan. 13, 2011, and ISR dated Oct. 7, 2009”. |
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Apr. 21, 2006, 16pp. |
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Aug. 7, 2008, 10 pp. |
Shearn; et al., “Reduction of bacterial contamination of teat cup liners by an entrained wash system,” Veterinary Record (1994), 134, 450, 1p. |
Thompson; et al. “The End-of-Milking Sequence and its Mechanization” 1976 Winter Mtg., Dec. 14-17, 1976, Animal Physiology and Genetics Inst., Beltsville, MD, 15pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,313, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,314, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/578,997, filed Jun. 12, 2004, Kevin L. Torgerson. |
Notice of Opposition and Opposition brief for EP Patent 1737291, Filed on Aug. 26, 2014 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH, 74 pages. |
Response filed Feb. 2, 2015 by An Udder IP Company in the Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 53 pages. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 24, 2015 for EP Application No. 15171008.4, 6 pages. |
Reply filed on Dec. 16, 2015 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH in the Opposition of EP Patent No. 1737291, 75 pages. |
Wildbrett et al., “Über Reinigung und Desinfektion von Tanks” Materials and Corrosion 12(12):759-764. Nov. 1961. |
European Patent Office Preliminary Opinion and Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Jan. 18, 2016, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 12 pages. |
European Search Report dated Aug. 13, 2014, EP Application No. 14159588.4, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/EP2014/077684, dated Apr. 10, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2018/058897, dated Feb. 25, 2019, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2018/059041, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 20 pages. |
Amendments and Observations filed Oct. 24, 2016 by an Udder IP Company Ltd in the Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 47 pages. |
Amendments and Observations filed Oct. 25, 2016 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH in the Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 13 pages. |
Nov. 10, 2016 EPO Communication re: the Proprietor, An Udder IP Company Ltd's request concerning the staying/postponement of the opposition proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 1 page. |
Nov. 25, 2016 EPO Communication re: results of the oral proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 5 pages. |
Dec. 8, 2016 EPO Communication; Details and minutes of the oral proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 13 pages. |
Mar. 30, 2017 EPO Communication, State of the Opposition Procedure and Invitation to File Observations, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 10 pages. |
Response filed by Udder IP Company LTD on Jun. 2, 2017, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 4 pages. |
Response filed by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH on May 29, 2017, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 5 pages. |
Jul. 27, 2017 EPO Communication; State of the Opposition Procedure and Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220079108 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62581526 | Nov 2017 | US | |
62581514 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16179660 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 17533291 | US |