1. Field
The present disclosure relates generally to records management and, more particularly, to tracking notifications to users of an automated records management system.
2. Related Art
Records management has become increasingly essential to the success and future of a business. Technological advances have given rise to greater reliance on electronic information in dispersed data systems. The amount of information to be gathered has also increased. For example, the Internet and its e-mail and web-based content gathering capabilities have aided the proliferation of data such as never before seen. The increasing amount of hard copy information has aided this proliferation as well.
Along with technological advances and the widespread propagation of data, a new age of corporate governance has also resulted in a greater emphasis on records management. Emphasis on issues such as corporate fraud have led to large-scale corporate liability and corporate failures. Greater focus is being given to corporations and their executives, as well as corporate compliance with new laws enacted as a part of this new age of corporate governance.
Corporate non-compliance is a major source of corporate liability, resulting in increased complexity for records management systems. Many compliance policies have been embodied in legislation. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 are examples of such legislation. Due to regulations such as these, it may be deemed necessary for a corporation to manage and maintain its records in a particular manner. Similarly, some courts have awarded judgments against various companies for the manner in which they negligently managed their records and/or destroyed records (e.g., Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC).
A significant number of companies now maintain formal records management programs, and it is widely agreed that such programs are important to the success of a business. However, current records management programs may not address the needs of today's businesses in that they have not been updated in accordance with technological advances. For example, many of today's records management programs do not incorporate electronic records.
Current records management programs may also lack protections that promote the consistent application and enforcement of records management policies. For example, some information technology systems may not be structured to support desired records management policies. Moreover, records may be incorrectly classified due to differences of opinion among users that manually perform classification operations.
One particular instance in which current records management programs have been deficient relates to ensuring that owners of records which have been put on hold are periodically reminded of the status of such records. Furthermore, improvements are also needed in the way records-related notifications sent to users are tracked and recorded.
The present disclosure addresses the needs noted above. One aspect of the present invention relates to a computer-based method for managing records. In accordance with this aspect, one or more records are identified within a records management system that have an associated hold and one or more users associated with the one or more records are identified. A respective e-mail message regarding the hold is sent to each of the one or more users; and a respective receipt, in response to the e-mail message, is collected from the one or more users. This allows users to be identified who do not open the e-mail message and to notify others, such as supervisors, of this activity.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a computer-based method for managing records that automatically declares records from e-mail receipts. First, one or more records within a records management system that are associated with an e-mail message are identified when delivering the e-mail message to one or more recipients. A respective receipt in response to the e-mail message is received from at least one of the one or more recipients; and the respective receipt is automatically declared as a new record within the records management system.
It is understood that other embodiments of the present disclosure will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein it is shown and described only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure by way of illustration.
Aspects of the present disclosure are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the accompanying drawings wherein:
Application Architecture for a Content Management System
Reviewing the general architecture for a Content Management System and referring now to
Using this architecture, system events can trigger actions in any part of the system. When content is added to the system, events may publish the content to the web or declare it as a record. In this manner, a file plan may be populated with record information within the system, and content may be managed both inside and outside the system.
The records management system 135, the process engine 150, the content engine 145, and the data tier 120 shown in
Alternatively, one or more of the various management systems may be separate, stand-alone systems that have been brought together and integrated merely for the purpose of creating the records management system. The records management application may be accessed by a user, whether a regular end user, records administrator, records manager or reviewer (privileged user) over a Java-based API that indicates the pertinent records management operation that the user can perform. These operations may include a declaration API, a record management API, a disposition API and a file plan management API. The APIs may incorporate XML technology for ease of use, as well as ease of import and export of information in the records management system.
The records management system described herein may be used to declare, classify and manage records of different types, secure repositories that contain records, create retention and disposition rules for records, control access to records, retrieve records based on search criteria, destroy records that are no longer used, review vital records, and add records with minimal user intervention.
The architecture of
File Plans and Disposition Schedules
The records management systems, methods and computer readable media of the present disclosure are designed to manage records of various types, including but not limited to, electronic documents and e-mails, physical records or artifacts, vital records and permanent records. A record can be any information asset that an organization desires to maintain and manage in a reliable manner.
Record declaration may be performed when a potential record is added to the system. In the case of electronic content, declaration may occur when a document is created or published, or upon the creation of a new document version, or when an e-mail is transmitted. For electronic documents as well as other types of records, the records may be automatically declared based on other, prior user input or business context. In the case of a physical artifact, declaration may occur, for example, when the physical artifact is received by a company. Records may also be generated in a variety of other uses and applications, e.g., part of a transaction, or during the course of a process. Process-centric records may be created as part of a company's line of business.
Advantageously, the records are organized according to some hierarchy often referred to as a file plan that contains an organized arrangement of data containers used to store documents and records. Typically, a disposition schedule is associated with the different data containers that defines the retention policy related to records stored in that particular data container. A single person, such as a records administrator, may be charged with responsibilities for designing a classification scheme, defining a new file plan, configuring naming patterns and phases, as well as defining and modifying disposition schedules. Major categories of the file plan may be category hierarchy and disposition schedules.
Referring now to
The category hierarchy may also include a tree structure defining how records are organized, and the category hierarchy may also propagate security and support disposition schedules. The category hierarchy may include a flexible hierarchical structure that is designed to fit the unique needs of an organization. For example, a top level may be “Accounting” with sublevels of “AR” and “AP.” Another top level may be “HR” with sublevels of “Policy” and “Resumes.” The category hierarchy may determine the scheme for classifying records in combination with events or business context so that the records may be automatically classified by a records management system, without user intervention.
The category hierarchy may be determined by business function. For example, a category hierarchy may be organized according to a function/activity/transaction model wherein the first level determines functional groupings, the second level determines activities within the function, and the lowest level represents a transaction. The hierarchy may also be designed to facilitate access. In this manner, security may be more easily controlled, user access in terms of browsing may provide better performance and the hierarchy may facilitate aggregation for purposes of disposition.
Alternatively to file plan design based on business function, a file plan may be designed so that each folder in the category is a client file that contains that particular client's records, and once the client folder is closed, cutoff may be triggered so that active use of the record ends and it begins its retention period.
As yet another alternative to file plan design based on business function, a file plan may be designed so that different types of records are filed into different folders. As yet another alternative, the file plan may be designed so that each sub-category represents a project, and each project may have a collection of folders to manage different records related to the project. An external event related to a project milestone may be used to trigger cutoff so that active use of the record ends and the retention period begins.
The record category may be added to the root of the file plan. The record category may also be added as a subcategory to an existing category to establish a hierarchy. The required properties of a category may be the category name which may be descriptive of the category, the category identifier which may be a more cryptic string identifier often containing a numeric code, and a reviewer which may default to the user who is adding the category.
A record folder may be added to a category. Conceptually, the record folder may be the most common level for managing records. The required properties for a folder may include the folder class such as a content engine object class defining the type of folder. The folder class may be defined by the data model. The folder properties may also include a name, identifier and reviewer much like the record category.
Generally, a record folder may not contain sub-folders, but may contain volumes. The first volume may be automatically added when the record folder is created, and a name may be automatically generated based on the folder name. When a new volume is added, the previous volume may be automatically closed. Volumes may be used to partition groups of records, whether similar or not. For example, a record folder may contain all invoices while volumes may be used to partition by month. A volume may be required to include a reviewer, which may default to the user requesting the volume.
As shown in
A broad variety of characteristics may be assigned as attributes to the file plan object 210, object stores 220, 230 and other objects. For example, these objects may incorporate attributes that are related to the records that are embodied in the software object such as a name for the record, a description of the record, the type of record, an identification of the holders of the record. Audit information may also be contained as an attribute relating to the record such as who accesses an object, when it is modified, who authorizes the modification, who generates documentation related to the object or repository, and when these events take place. Electronic signatures that may have been procured in connection with an object store such as object stores 210, 220, 230 may be contained as an attribute. Notifications that should be issued upon a change in an aspect of a data object, security information relating to a data object, status information that is associated with the record (such as lost item), relevant dates (e.g., creation date, expiry date, and/or key timelines, including multiple, periodic or cyclical information), and relationships between the record software object and other components may be contained as attributes.
Although each of these characteristics may be illustrated as an attribute of the object, each of these may also or instead be stored as separate components or objects in the record management system.
The data model 200 includes pointers from the file plan object store 210 to records stored in other systems or locations. One such pointer is to object stores related to documents 220, 230 which are the main record types and thus use more space. The data model also includes pointers to an image service repository 240, a cabinet repository for physical documents 250 that may be located in cabinets, as well as a box repository for physical documents 260 that may be located in boxes. This design provides for a file plan that incorporates an intuitive scheme that can be readily used by the records administrator to generate a file plan. Based on this user-friendly structure, a records administrator may customize the file plan to fit the company's needs.
Methods may be related to the records, including methods that include or relate to retention and disposition rules, timed events, notifications, reports and trends and forecasts. Each of these methods may constitute software subroutines that initiate, alter or interrupt one or more processes. As with the attributes, the methods may be stored separately from the file plan object store or data object in another object or component.
Record Hold Notification
Within a records management system as just described, there are occasions when a record, or set of records, is subject to a hold; which means that the records should not be destroyed until the hold is lifted. Typically, the company utilizing the records management system designates an operator that has responsibility for marking the records which are subject to a hold. However, the determination that a hold is needed may be made by a variety of parties within the company. For example, the legal department may realize that certain records need to be preserved because of an ongoing or pending litigation. Similarly, the IT department or a corporate officer may determine that there is an obligation to preserve certain records. In such instances, those records are identified in the fileplan and a hold is placed on them.
These records may be electronic records or physical records. In the case of electronic records, the records management system may protect the records from being destroyed but in the case of physical records, the owner or manager of those records will need to prevent their destruction. In either case, a variety of people having some relation to the records placed on hold should be notified about the records' status.
In step 302, those records in the fileplan over which a “hold” has been placed are identified. As mentioned previously, holds may be placed for a number of reasons and may specify a single record or a group of related records. Part of the information associated with the fileplan includes the owner of a record and may also include a records manager for that record. Other people who may have possession of the record or are somehow responsible for it may be identified as well by the fileplan.
The records management system sends, in step 304, a notification to the owners/managers that certain records are on hold. When the hold is placed on the records, a notification message may be created that further explains the nature of the hold and the expected actions of anyone who receives the notification. For example, the notification may explain what records are on hold and why they are on hold. It may instruct the receiver to return that record and any other related record to the record center or some other area for safe keeping. Record center managers may receive a different notification message which along with identifying records on hold, may identify who has the records (and needs to return them) and who may or may not access the records. The notifications are preferably sent via e-mail to the record authors, owners and/or managers or by registered mail, workflow system, physical memos and automatic telephone call.
An e-mail manager application that is part of the records management system or interfaces with the records management system is used to generate the e-mails. The e-mail messages are constructed so that upon being opened, a receipt is returned to the e-mail manager. In step 306, the e-mail manager collects the receipts that are returned in order to identify anyone who has not opened the e-mail notification about the records' hold. Various rules may be defined for how the e-mail manager handles non-responders. For example, a follow-up message may be sent after three days. Alternatively, a follow-up message may be sent, in step 308, to a record owners supervisor or the corporate counsel.
In another embodiment, the process engine generates the emails and collects the receipts in step 306, in order to identify anyone who has not opened the e-mail notification about the records' hold. Various rules may be defined for how the process engine handles non-responders. For example, a follow-up message may be sent after three days. Alternatively, a follow-up message may be sent by the process engine, in step 308, to a record owners supervisor or the corporate counsel.
As indicated by step 310, the process can repeat itself periodically. For example, every evening, an automated process may run across the entire fileplan so that notifications are sent for all records which have been placed on hold. More realistically, the hold notification process may occur on a weekly or monthly basis depending on what various laws may require or what court judgments have indicated is prudent records management. In addition to the periodic sending of notifications, the process may be initiated each time an operator places a record on hold within the records management system. In this way, record owners/managers may be periodically notified of records that should not be destroyed and/or records that need to be returned to a records center or other safe location. Furthermore, by tracking who does and does not open the notification messages, the system can provide some record of what corrective action has been taken in order to comply with the hold order.
Automatic Declaration of E-Mail Receipts
As mentioned in the discussion of the records management system of
In step 404, the e-mail message is sent to the recipients. When the recipients open the e-mail message, a return receipt is generated. The e-mail manager collects, in step 406, the return receipts. Furthermore, in step 408, the return receipts are automatically declared as records in the fileplan and are linked to the original record(s) that was associated with the e-mail message.
The e-mail message may, for example, detail the secrecy that should be accorded a particular record. The e-mail message allows the secrecy instructions to be disseminated and the return receipts acknowledge that a user was properly informed of these instructions. Furthermore, by linking the return receipts with the original record(s), the disposition of the return receipts may be controlled based on the disposition of the original record(s). In other words, the return receipt records may be prevented from destruction until the underlying record has been destroyed or passes a particular milestone (e.g., approval, etc.).
The receipts for physical records may be declared as records as well. For example, if a physical record is delivered via FEDERAL EXPRESS® (FEDERAL EXPRESS is a registered trademark of Federal Express Corporation), or similar service, then that physical receipt can be scanned as an electronic document and declared a record.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable one skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. The principles set forth herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4608679 | Rudy et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4675856 | Rudy et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4685095 | Rudy et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5144556 | Wang et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5710921 | Hirose | Jan 1998 | A |
RE35861 | Queen | Jul 1998 | E |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5940804 | Turley et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6061679 | Bournas et al. | May 2000 | A |
6141754 | Choy | Oct 2000 | A |
6253369 | Cloud et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6314437 | Starek et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338074 | Poindexter et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347299 | Holzman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360234 | Jain et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6505219 | MacLean et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553365 | Summerlin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581069 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6690774 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7010602 | Poindexter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7080066 | Scheurich et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7159178 | Vogt et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213022 | Whelan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7237184 | Ballard et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7321886 | Swaminathan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7401057 | Eder | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428724 | Pike et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7496860 | Saxena et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20010013004 | Haris et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039542 | Okada et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032689 | Abbott | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055888 | Beran et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059466 | Poindexter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020137493 | Dutta | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030023736 | Abkemeier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046369 | Sim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093458 | Poindexter et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105738 | Taketa et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135559 | Bellotti et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030182332 | McBrearty et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182380 | Yabe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187878 | Sandifer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236788 | Kanellos et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039646 | Hacker | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054685 | Rahn et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040117358 | von Kaenel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128182 | Pepoon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168058 | Margolus | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040187140 | Aigner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193740 | Kasmirsky et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230941 | Marin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249871 | Bazoon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260769 | Yamamoto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027696 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044197 | Lai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055519 | Stuart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076049 | Qubti et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080771 | Fish | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149365 | Johnson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154723 | Liang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216448 | Talib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222984 | Radestock et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222993 | Ohtomo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246276 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004689 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047650 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085245 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085374 | Mayes et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149735 | DeBie et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179061 | D'Souza et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230044 | Utiger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282292 | Brink et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070088585 | Maguire | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088715 | Slackman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088736 | DeBie | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070150445 | DeBie | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168315 | Covannon et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192423 | Karlson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239715 | DeBie | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260619 | Whelan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271308 | Bentley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271517 | Finkelman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9905632 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080086506 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |