The field generally relates to systems for the automated sorting of sealable bags and methods of use thereof.
Currently, the determination of whether a sealable bag is properly sealed for airtightness, and the subsequent sorting and packing of the sealable bag, is a labor-intensive process with inherent inefficiencies. There remains a need for apparatus and method for automating the process.
According to certain aspects described herein, a determination of whether a sealable bag is or is not properly sealed involves contactless scanning of a surface or surfaces of the sealable bag (upper or lower surface or both) as the sealable bag is conveyed past an inspection station so as to obtain a surface profile topology of the surface, or three-dimensional rendering thereof. The determination of proper sealing is made by calculating apparent volume of the sealable bag from the surface profile topology and determining whether the apparent volume exceeds a threshold, or minimum dimensions are obtained over a sufficient area. This method also allows for a determination of the “air fill” of the bag, which allows a determination of over-filled and under-filled air filled bags. Over filled bags may have difficulty fitting into secondary packaging. Under air filled bags may not have sufficient air to prevent the contents (such as snack chips) from breaking during handing, secondary packaging and transportation.
Because scanning and three-dimensional profiling of the sealable bag is contactless, an advantageous effect is obtained whereby the determination of a proper seal is made with little to no pressure applied to the bag, which itself might cause a rupture in an otherwise properly sealed bag. Moreover, scanning of the sealable bag can be completed quickly, resulting in rapid throughput on a continuous basis.
In more detail, an apparatus for automated sorting of a sealable bag, comprises a conveyor configured to convey a sealable bag past an inspection station; a scanner configured and positioned to contactlessly scan a surface or surfaces of the sealable bag (upper or lower surface or both) as the sealable bag passes through the inspection station, and to obtain a surface profile topology of the scanned surface; a controller configured to calculate apparent volume of the sealable bag from the surface profile topology or from the three-dimensional profiling, and to determine whether the apparent volume is within volume thresholds of over filled, under filled and unsealed bags; and a sorting mechanism. The sorting mechanism is controlled by the controller to sort the sealable bag to a discard station responsive to a determination that the apparent volume of the sealable bag does not fit within the selected threshold(s).
A method for automated sorting of a sealable bag, comprises contactlessly scanning a surface or surfaces of the sealable bag (upper or lower surface or both) of a sealable bag as the sealable bag is conveyed past an inspection station; obtaining a surface profile topology of the scanned surface; calculating apparent volume of the sealable bag from the surface profile topology; determining whether the apparent volume falls within selected thresholds including thresholds such as over filled, under filled and unsealed bags; and sorting the sealable bag to a discard station responsive to a determination that the apparent volume of the sealable bag does not fit within the selected threshold(s).
The scanned surface of the sealable bag may be contactlessly scanned by means of one or more than one of light, lidar, patterned light, sonar, acoustic, and radar. The threshold may a predetermined threshold selected in accordance with expected size of the sealable bag, or the threshold may be a calculated threshold based on the horizontal extent of the sealable bag as calculated based on the surface profile. The apparent volume may be calculated under an assumption that the unscanned surface of the sealable bag is similar to the scanned surface, e.g., a mirror image of the scanned surface. The sealable bag may be shaped prior to scanning at the inspection station, such as by flattened by a leveling mechanism or tamped by a tamping mechanism prior to scanning at the inspection station, especially for ensuring that the unscanned surface is similar to the scanned surface, for improved accuracy in calculation of the apparent volume, and for increased consistency in the appearance of the bag at the inspection station.
In other aspects, the determination of whether the scanned bag meets the selected threshold or thresholds (over filled, under filled and/or unsealed bag) may be made based on horizontal extent (i.e., size) and scanned height of the bag.
Further objectives and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the description, drawings, and examples.
Some embodiments of the current disclosure herein are discussed in detail below. In describing embodiments, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure herein is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other equivalent components can be employed, and other methods developed, without departing from the broad concepts of the current disclosure herein. Any reference cited anywhere in this specification, including the Background and Detailed Description sections, is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In general, embodiments of the disclosure involve a conveyor configured to convey a sealable bag past an inspection station; a scanner configured and positioned to contactlessly scan a surface or surfaces (upper or lower or both) of the sealable bag as the sealable bag passes through the inspection station, and to obtain a surface profile topology of the scanned surface; a controller configured to calculate apparent volume of the sealable bag from the surface profile topology, and to determine whether the apparent volume fits within a threshold or thresholds signifying over-filling, under-filling or unsealed bags; and a sorting mechanism controlled in response to a determination of whether that the apparent volume of the sealable bag does or does not fit within the threshold(s).
As depicted in
In one embodiment, scanner 105 is a surface height profiler using a laser light curtain to measure surface height across multiple scan lines as bag 103 advances through inspection 104. In one example, scanner 105 may be an LJ-X8000 Series Laser Profiler available from Keyence Corporation of America, which performs 2 D/3 D measurements and inspections of the surface shape of objects in line with conveyance of the object. However, in other embodiments, it should be understood that other scanners may be used for contactless measurement of the surface profile of bag 103 as it passes through the inspection station, such as contactless scanners that rely on light, lidar, patterned light, sonar, acoustic, radar, and so forth, to obtain a surface profile topology of the scanned surface of bag 103 without contacting to the bag.
where L is the apparent length of the bag as derived from the surface profile, Ai is the area under each i-th scan line, and N is the number of scan lines within the apparent length L of the bag. The factor “2” is included under the assumption that the unscanned lower surface of the bag, which is not visible to scanner 105, is similar to the scanned upper surface, such as by being a mirror image of the upper surface.
The apparent volume is compared against one or more thresholds, as described below in connection with
Although in this embodiment apparent volume of the bag is calculated using an assumption that the unscanned lower surface of the bag is similar to the scanned upper surface, in other embodiments this assumption need not be made, with the threshold(s) adjusted accordingly. For example, the apparent volume may be calculated as a rectangular box down to the surface of conveyor 101, with a bag-shaped top to the box as determined by the scanned profile of the upper surface of the bag. In this case, the threshold(s) are adjusted upwardly to compensate for the increase in apparent volume.
Reverting to
LB×WB=6.25 inches×5.50 inches
where LB and WB are length and width of the bag, respectively. As a result, the threshold used by controller 109 is a predetermined threshold selected in accordance with expected size or volume of the sealable bag.
In other embodiments, the controller calculates horizontal extent of the sealable bag based on the surface profile, and then calculates an individualized threshold for each bag as it is inspected, based on the horizontal extent. For example, reverting to
The term “controller” refers to a component configured to interact with and at least partially command operation of various components including, but not limited to conveyor 101, scanner 105 and flapper 110 (described below). The controller commands operation of various components at least in part based on information received from the various components. In some embodiments, the controller comprises a processor and/or a software component.
The term “bag” or “sealable bag” (also referred to as a sachet, pouch, or pillow pack, stand up pouch, gusseted pouch, and so forth) refers to a sealable container for carrying a product, such as snack-sized bags for chips or other snacks, flexible wrapped packages, pouches, sachet, and/or pillow packs. The sealable bag might or might not be sealed.
On the other hand,
In
More specifically, at step S301, a surface profile topology of a surface of sealable bag 103 (here, the upper surface sealable bag 103) is obtained as the bag is conveyed by conveyor 101 past inspection station 104. The surface profile is obtained contactlessly by obtaining multiple scan lines of the upper surface of bag 103 as the bag moves through the inspection station. As indicated above, the scan lines are obtained contactlessly by scanners that rely on light, lidar, patterned light, sonar, acoustic, radar, and so forth, to obtain a surface profile topology of the upper surface of bag 103.
In step S302, the apparent volume of the bag is calculated from the surface profile topology, such as by application of Equation (1), above.
In step S303, the computation of apparent volume is compared against a threshold or thresholds including thresholds such as over filled, under filled and unsealed bags, to determine whether the apparent volume fits within the selected threshold(s). The threshold(s) which may be a predetermined threshold selected in accordance with expected size of the sealable bag, or an individualized calculated threshold which is calculated based on the horizontal extent of the bag.
If step S303 determines that the computation of apparent volume fits within the selected threshold(s), the bag is accepted and is advanced in step S304 to a packing station. On the other hand, if step S303 determines that the computation of apparent volume does not fit within the selected threshold(s), the bag is discarded in step S305 to a discard station.
As depicted in
The bag is scanned in multiple scan lines as it passes the inspection station, to obtain a collection of multiple scan lines that define the surface profiles of both the upper and the lower surfaces of bag 103. Each of the scan lines defines an area under the scan line, and apparent volume of the bag is may be calculated by obtaining a sum of the areas under each scan line and multiplying by the apparent length L of the bag, as derived from the surface profile. Specifically:
where L is the apparent length of the bag as derived from the surface profile, AiL is and AiU are the areas under each i-th scan line for the lower (L) and upper (U) surfaces, respectively, and N is the number of scan lines within the apparent length L of the bag. Unlike the
If step S703 determines that the dimensions of the bag fit within the selected threshold(s), the bag is accepted and is advanced in step S705 to a packing station. On the other hand, if step S703 determines that the dimensions of the bag fit within the selected threshold(s), the bag is discarded in step S704 to a discard station.
The embodiments illustrated and discussed in this specification are intended only to teach those skilled in the art how to make and use the disclosure herein. It will be understood that the features of the various embodiments may be combined, for example, scanning of both the upper and lower surfaces may be combined with a tamping or leveling mechanism, or with use of thresholds in addition to or other than volume thresholds.
In describing embodiments of the disclosure herein, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure herein is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected. The above-described embodiments of the disclosure herein may be modified or varied, without departing from the disclosure herein, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the claims and their equivalents, the disclosure herein may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
This application claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/295748 filed Dec. 31, 2021, the content of which is incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in full.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4510730 | Edmondson | Apr 1985 | A |
4697452 | Prakken | Oct 1987 | A |
4955226 | Beaty et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5507177 | Focke | Apr 1996 | A |
6094888 | Pazdernik | Aug 2000 | A |
6105419 | Michels et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6568247 | Taylor | May 2003 | B2 |
6717087 | Wecke | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7900502 | Yokota et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
9346170 | Baylor | May 2016 | B2 |
9518891 | Subhash et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20150316441 | Subhash et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3062081 | Aug 2016 | EP |
2006038458 | Feb 2006 | JP |
1993007459 | Apr 1993 | WO |
2005005949 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2011026585 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2017069199 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2019035711 | Feb 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yokota; Suketsugu, “Apparatus and Method for Checking Seal” (English Translation), Feb. 9, 2006, worldwide.espacenet.com (Year: 2006). |
Ishida, High-performance In-Line Seal Tester TSC-RVS, May 31, 2019. |
Taptone, Leak Detection on Stand-up Pouches, Dec. 31, 2015. |
Keyence Laser Profiler, LJ-X8000 Series, User's Manual (3D Mode), Jun. 2020. |
Keyence LJ-X8000 Series, Easy Configuration Manual, 3D Mode Edition, Jan. 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63295748 | Dec 2021 | US |