Patent Grant
7337989
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This invention relates to sprayers that are designed to automatically clean shower/bathing enclosures (especially those in residential buildings). More particularly, it relates to rotating sprayers having a nozzle which permits the verticality of the spray direction to be adjusted to account for different size enclosures and hard to clean localized stains.
The walls/doors of shower enclosures can become mildewed, coated with soap build up, hard water and/or mineral deposits, or become otherwise soiled, during typical use. Removing these deposits and stains has in the past required one to scrub the walls and doors by hand, particularly if significant amounts of time have passed between cleanings.
To assist in this task, cleaning chemicals have been sprayed, squirted, or otherwise applied on the surfaces to be cleaned. The walls are then scrubbed with a cloth, brush, or scrubbing pad, and then rinsed with water.
More recently some of these cleaners have been designed so that the amount of scrubbing can be reduced or even eliminated without compromising cleaning, particularly where the cleaners are sprayed on a daily basis. See generally, WO 96/22346 and WO 98/02511. These cleaners are designed so as not to themselves leave spots or other visible stains, even if not rinsed off for hours or days after application.
“No scrub” cleaners are preferably applied after the shower has been used. This is accomplished by a consumer keeping a pump spray bottle of the cleanser in or near the shower enclosure, remembering to do the spraying (which may be problematic if the consumer has just woken up), and being willing (or able) to spend the time necessary to spray the enclosure.
An alternative no scrub approach is to provide an automated sprayer device for a shower. For example, U.S. patent application publication 2004/0050959 discloses an automated cleansing sprayer that uses an internal pump to spray cleaning fluid from a reservoir out from a rotating nozzle against enclosure walls. One presses an activation button, leaves the shower, and lets the device run through a spraying cycle. There is no need for scrubbing the enclosure walls, or rinsing off the cleaning liquid.
However, not all enclosures are of the same size. For example, some shower enclosures are essentially square in top view and relatively small. Some bathing enclosures are elongated rectangular in top view and much larger. A rotating nozzle configured to clean a small shower may not direct cleaning liquid to all of the desired portions of a larger bathing enclosure.
To address that concern, one might use multiple nozzle holes to spread the spray more widely, or configure the device at a compromise setting half-way between optimized settings for the largest and smallest expected enclosures. However, either such approach might require extra cleaning liquid to achieve the desired cleaning.
Further, where such devices are first installed after an enclosure has already become heavily stained in a localized manner, there is a desire to use extra cleaner on the most stained area. However, such devices are designed to spray in a more uniform manner as a general rule. This may lead a consumer to use extra cycles of the device to achieve cleaning, and/or a consumer becoming dissatisfied with the cleaning performance.
In unrelated work U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,992,404, 5,536,200 and 5,248,094 showed various structures for pointing nozzles. However, these systems were not easily adaptable to the present environment. For example, the use of a universal nozzle joint in the context of the present device would be unsuitable as rotational forces would be likely to drive the nozzle out of the selected position.
Hence, a need still exists for improved automated shower cleaners, particularly with respect to capability of adjusting for different size enclosures and providing for localized stain treatment capability.
In one aspect the invention provides an automated sprayer for spraying an enclosure with a liquid cleanser. There is a spray head having an outlet through which cleanser can be expelled during operation of the sprayer (if the sprayer is linked to a supply of such liquid cleanser). There is also a nozzle positioned on the outlet, and a motor for rotating the spray head (preferably around an essentially vertical axis).
The vertical position of the nozzle is capable of being manually adjusted to adjust where the liquid cleanser is directed by the sprayer. For example, the nozzle may be capable of being manually pivoted relative to the spray head to adjust an angle at which the liquid cleanser is directed during operation of the sprayer (when the sprayer is linked to a supply of such liquid cleanser). The nozzle connection is sufficiently stable so that mere rotation of the spray head won't dislodge the angle.
In some preferred forms the outlet is linked to a first tube, and the nozzle is in the form of a second tube linked to the first tube along an essentially horizontal pivot axis. Most preferably the nozzle is not capable of being universally pivoted relative to the first tube, or capable of being pivoted in a direction of rotation of the spray head.
The nozzle can be manually pivoted relative to the spray head to adjust the angle at which the liquid cleanser is directed during operation by up to at least 90 degrees, preferably by up to at least 120 degrees, even more preferably by up to at least 160 degrees, most preferably by about 180 degrees.
In an alternative form the nozzle has a nipple attached directly to the outlet. Here the pivoting of the nipple is enabled within the spray head, preferably by a joint upstream of the outlet.
Alternatively, the nozzle's vertical position could be manually adjusted by other means. For example, the entire turret could be linked by a ratchet or other connection permitting it to be pushed towards or away from the main sprayer body, while still permitting it to rotate.
Note that by “manual” we are preferring something that can be achieved without the use of tools to make the adjustment, but are not excluding the possibility of an adjustment system that can use a screw driver or other manual tool to facilitate the adjustment.
For small enclosures the nozzle won't usually be positioned/pointed as much upward as for larger ones (absent a localized stain to be cleaned). In this regard, for larger enclosures one typically wants a more vertical spray direction so as to be able to provide adequate spray at even the upper parts of the farthest away walls. A consumer that wants to install such a device in their enclosure would assess generally its dimensions, take into account the location of the best mounting position (e.g. the shower outlet pipe), and then angle the nozzle to optimize spraying (likely taking into account package recommendations).
If a consumer instead wants to begin use of the sprayer on an enclosure already heavily stained at localized positions, and wants to direct extra cleaning effort at those positions, the initial directional and vertical position setting can take that into account. Then, when that stain is adequately addressed, the setting can be optimized for a more uniform treatment optimized for that enclosure.
These adjustability advantages can be achieved at low additional cost. Further, this type of adjustment mechanism can even be retrofit on certain existing devices of this type.
These and other advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows and the drawings. It should be appreciated that what follows is merely a description of preferred embodiments. That description is not meant as a limitation of the full scope of the claims. Rather, the claims should be looked to in order to judge the full scope of the invention.
The sprayer 10 includes a bottle 12 containing a supply of cleaning liquid, a housing 14 with an adjustable hanger 26, and a rotatable spray head 32 having a manually-adjustable nozzle 20. Alternatively, a fixed wire hanger may be used for mounting purposes.
Apart from the portion shown in
The pump delivers cleaning liquid from the bottle 12 to the spray head 32. The sprayer 10 is typically suspended from a shower pipe or the like. Thus, it does not require room electrical power, or a connection to the room water supply.
Once activated by pressing button 35, an internal computer controller delays a spraying cycle for a short period, allowing the consumer to exit the shower. The spray cycle then begins and ends automatically (e.g. one minute of rotational spraying). The cycle is preferably initiated immediately after a consumer finishes a shower and is about to leave the shower. Hence, there is no rinsing in a typical application, at least not until the next time the shower is normally used.
As shown in
The outlet 202 is connected to a first tube 203 which then connects to nozzle 20. Nozzle 20 comprises a turret 22 having side arms 40 holding an axle 41 that pins a second tube/nipple 23. The axle 41 may be short projections from each side of tube 23 that snap into accommodating recesses on the arms 40. Alternatively, it may be a through axle that passes through the arms and the tube 23.
In any event, the idea is to allow the second tube 23 to pivot relative to the first tube 203 between the arms 40. This can be achieved without losing fluid communication because the inner termini of the tubes 23/203 can both lead into an enlarged pocket defined between arms 40, with the termini spaced enough from each other to allow the pivoting.
The arms 40 can frictionally engage the second tube 23 to permit the desired angle adjustment, but still resist unintended adjustment due to gravity or rotational forces. If desired, ratchet structures can be provided between the internal surfaces of the arms 40 and corresponding projections can be provided on second tube 23 to interact with those ratchet structures, to further insure desired angular settings.
The sprayer 10 may be hung so that its outlet 202 extends downwardly at approximately a 30 degree angle. As seen in
Most preferably, the arms 40 provide a vertical slot that inhibits undesired angling of the nozzle 23 in the direction that the spray head rotates. The arms thus resist rotational forces.
In an alternate embodiment, as seen in
In a further embodiment, rather than making the adjustment by a pivoting, one could have the turret 22 mounted so that it is vertically adjustable as a whole within the supporting structure 202 and suitable to be fixed at specified vertical positions. That would achieve some manual adjustment, albeit derived from verticality alone, rather than angular direction.
In yet another embodiment, both the pivotal adjustment and the vertical adjustment of the prior paragraph could be incorporated. This could provide greater flexibility. For example, in a small enclosure with a lower stain one might want to direct the nozzle down without raising the turret. In a large enclosure with a lower stain one might want to direct the nozzle down while also raising the turret.
Preferred embodiments of the invention have been described above. However, modifications and variations to the preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure, which will be within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Therefore, the invention should not be limited to just the described embodiments. To ascertain the full scope of the invention, reference should be made to the following claims.
The invention provides a sprayer for automatically spraying the walls of shower enclosures or the like, where the sprayer can be optimized for use with different size enclosures.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2858836 | Geh et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
| 2992781 | Howard, Sr. | Jul 1961 | A |
| 3563464 | Doornnbos et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3994310 | Brandon | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4596362 | Pralle et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 5248094 | Munoz | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5316218 | Bowen | May 1994 | A |
| 5377913 | Van Der Woude | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5536200 | Kiess | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5865374 | Barta et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5971301 | Stouffer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5992301 | Mukumoto | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992404 | Bleyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6230091 | McQuinn | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6322008 | Aker et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328543 | Benecke | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6729559 | Zanma et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6820821 | Linstedt et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 7021499 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7111800 | Berning et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7152808 | Jenkins | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 20040050959 | Mazooji et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217197 | Mazooji et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050127204 | Linstedt et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1191166 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 10-328059 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| WO9622346 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO9802511 | Jan 1998 | WO |
