This specification relates to user task management and user task progress and location tracking.
Task management is the process of managing tasks throughout their lifecycle. Typical project management software can manage estimation and planning, scheduling, cost control and budget for tasks within a project. Mobile device tracking refers to attaining the current geographic location of the mobile device by receiving location coordinates from the device.
In general, one aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of assigning a respective task to each user of a plurality of users, the task having a schedule indicating one or more scheduled times when the user should be located at a respective geographic location for the scheduled time; sending respective information to one or more client devices, wherein each client device is associated with a different one of the users and wherein the information comprises the geographic locations indicated by the schedule for the task assigned to the user, wherein the client device is configured to track locations of the client device; receiving tracked locations from a plurality of the client devices and monitoring the tracked locations over time; determining a respective task progress for each of a plurality of first users based on monitoring; and modifying the respective task assigned to one or more second users based on the respective task progresses. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding systems, apparatus, and computer programs.
These and other aspects can optionally include one or more of the following features. Determining the respective task progress for a particular user can comprise determining based on one or more of the tracked locations whether the particular user is located in a geographic location indicated by the schedule of the task assigned to the particular user at a scheduled time corresponding to a current time and, based thereon, determining the respective task progress for the particular user. Determining the respective task progress for a particular user can also comprise predicting an arrival time of the particular user to a geographic location indicated by the schedule of the task assigned to the particular user based on the tracked locations and, based thereon, determining the respective task progress for the particular user. Determining the respective task progress for a particular user can also comprise determining based on information received from the client device of the particular user is a degree of completion of the task assigned to the particular user and, based thereon, determining the respective task progress for the particular user. The task assigned to the particular user can comprise one or more milestones and the information received from the client device of the particular user is an indication of which milestones have been completed. Modifying the respective task assigned to a particular user can comprise modifying the schedule of the task assigned to the particular user or assigning a new task to the particular user. Modifying the respective task assigned to one or more of the users based on the respective task progresses can comprise calculating a performance metric based on the task progresses; and identifying the one or more second users based on, at least, the performance metric. The aspect can further comprise identifying one or more rules for a particular task, each rule specifying a respective condition and a respective action; selecting one or more of the rules for which the respective condition is satisfied; and performing the respective action of each of the selected rules. An action can comprise one or more of the following: sending an electronic notification message to a device associated with a user, modifying the task assigned to a user, or changing the task assigned to the user. The electronic notification can be one of: an electronic mail message, a short message service message, a voice mail message, a phone call, and an application-specific message.
In general, another aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of configuring a client device to monitor the geographic location of the client device over time; and configuring the monitoring so that the monitoring cannot be terminated by a user of the client device and that disabling of the monitoring by the user will cause the client device to be locked. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding systems, apparatus, and computer programs.
These and other aspects can optionally include one or more of the following features. Determine whether the user has disabled the monitoring and, based thereon, sending a notification of such to a remote system and locking the client device. The aspect can further comprise receiving information from a remote system comprising one or more time periods during which a location of a client device can be tracked; monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by obtaining a plurality of location coordinates from the client device during the time period and persistently storing the location coordinates on the client device; and sending different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled. Receiving the plurality of location coordinates from the client device may not require a transmitter of the client device to be enabled. The aspect can further comprise detecting that the client device had been powered off and, based thereon, continuing to send different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled. Monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by receiving a plurality of location coordinates of the client device during the time period can comprise obtaining fewer location coordinates at times when the client device is traveling in a substantially straight line or at slow speeds. Monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by receiving a plurality of location coordinates of the client device during the time period can comprise determining that during a first period of time the client device is in a same location and, based thereon, combining multiple location coordinates for the first period of time into a single location coordinate. Sending different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled can comprise determining that throughput of a first transmitter of the client device is unacceptable; and based on the determination, sending the different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system using a second transmitter of the client device. A particular transmitter can be a cellular transmitter or a Wi-Fi transmitter.
In general, another aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of configuring a client device to monitor the geographic location of the client device over time; and determining that the user has disabled the monitoring and, based thereon, sending a notification of such to a remote system and locking the client device. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding systems, apparatus, and computer programs.
These and other aspects can optionally include one or more of the following features. The aspect can further comprise receiving information from a remote system comprising one or more time periods during which a location of a client device can be tracked; monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by obtaining a plurality of location coordinates from the client device during the time period and persistently storing the location coordinates on the client device; sending different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled. Receiving the plurality of location coordinates from the client device may not require a transmitter of the client device to be enabled. The aspect can further comprise detecting that the client device had been powered off and, based thereon, continuing to send different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled. Monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by receiving a plurality of location coordinates of the client device during the time period can comprise obtaining fewer location coordinates at times when the client device is traveling in a substantially straight line or at slow speeds. Monitoring the location of the client device during each of the time periods by receiving a plurality of location coordinates of the client device during the time period can comprise determining that during a first period of time the client device is in a same location and, based thereon, combining multiple location coordinates for the first period of time into a single location coordinate. Sending different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system at times when a transmitter of the client device is enabled can comprise determining that throughput of a first transmitter of the client device is unacceptable; and based on the determination, sending the different ones of the stored location coordinates to the remote system using a second transmitter of the client device. A particular transmitter can be a cellular transmitter or a Wi-Fi transmitter.
Particular embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented to realize one or more of the following advantages. The system described herein automatically tracks tasks assigned to employees and tracks employees' whereabouts in order to determine whether tasks are progressing according to schedules. When this is not the case, the system can modify or reassign tasks so that the progress of the tasks in the aggregate satisfies a performance requirement. Software installed on users' mobile devices (e.g., smart phones) can be used to track user locations and send the locations to the system for purposes of assessing users' task progressions. The software can also inform the user of their task schedule and progress.
The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
The task monitor 124 is a software component that monitors the progress of each task assigned to a user (e.g., employee, contractor, subcontractor, client, etc.) of the server system 122. Task definitions are stored in tasks database 106. Tasks can have one or more of the properties in TABLE 1. Other task properties are possible.
Information for each user of the system is stored in the user database 108, including what tasks, if any, have been assigned to the user. The properties in TABLE 2 can be stored in the user database 108 for each user. Fewer or more user properties are possible.
An application such as a web-based application can be provided as an end-user application 116 to allow users define and modify task and user properties through a graphical user interface, for example. The end-user applications 116 can be accessed through the network 113 by users of client devices (e.g., client device 126).
The task monitor 124 monitors the progress of milestone completion for each assigned task by processing events in the event log 102 in order to maintain the current state of each task. An event is a collection of information generated by the system or by a user based on their activities. In further implementations, an event can be generated by an external system such as, for example, an employee time card system which tracks when users clock in and out or an employee telephone usage tracking system. The system 122 stores events in the event log 102. Each event can have two or more of the properties in TABLE 3. Other event properties are possible.
The location monitor 114 receives location data from portable client devices through one or more data communication networks 113 such as the Internet, for example. The client devices (e.g., 128, 118, 122, 126, and 124) are data processing apparatus such as, for instance, smart phones, tablet computers, smart watches, smart glasses, laptop and portable computers, personal computers, and other data processing apparatus. Data describing devices assigned to users is stored in device database 110. The data can include the type of device, its operating system, its Internet Protocol address, the owner of the device, and so on. The client devices can be configured to track their geographic location over time and send location updates through the network 113 to the location monitor 114. (Client device software components for location tracking are described further below.) The location monitor 114 in turn generates user location events which are inserted into the event log. For example, a user location event could contain the following information:
Time and Date: 2:23 PM, Mar. 6, 2014
Source: Location Monitor
User: Frederick Dean
Type: User Location Event
Data: 3987 Oak Street heading South West at 32 miles per hour.
The location information received from a client device will comprise a timestamp and a location of the client device at the time corresponding to the time stamp. The location information can be in the form of a street address, latitude and longitude coordinates, or another form. In some implementations, the location information received from the client device includes the compass heading and speed of travel. In other implementations, the location monitor 114 can deduce the compass heading and speed of travel by analyzing location information received from a particular client device over time.
In further implementations, if a task requires travel and a task milestone indicates a geographic location that the user must be in at a given time, the location monitor 114 can predict the time that the user will arrive at the location and generate an event. The location monitor 114 can identify such milestones in the task database 106 and find corresponding users from the user database 108 that have been assigned those tasks. Location information received from client devices of the users can then be used to generate predicted arrival times. By way of illustration, such an event comprise the following information:
Time and Date: 2:24 PM, Mar. 6, 2014
Source: Location Monitor
User: Frederick Dean
Task: Package Delivery
Milestone: Arrive at 3987 Oak Street, Pasadena, Calif. 91105.
Type: Predicted User Arrival
Data: 3:47 PM.
Task and milestone information for a user can be sent to the user's client device by the task monitor 124. This allows the client device to keep the user up-to-date on task progress as well as allowing the user to indicate when a milestone is complete (for milestones that do not indicate completion by the user being located in a specific geographic location). For example, a graphical user interface (or other user interface) on the client device can provide an input method for the user to indicate that a milestone is complete. The client device then generates an event, such as the following, and sends the event to the server system 122 for insertion in the event log 102:
Time and Date: 11:35 PM, Mar. 2, 2014
Source: Mike Towers
User: Mike Towers
Task: Project Alpha
Milestone: Code and test rate exchange software module.
Type: Milestone status event
Data: Milestone completed.
The task monitor 124 monitors the progress of milestone completion for each assigned task by processing user location events, predicted user arrival events, and milestone completion events in the event log 102 in order to maintain the current completion state of each milestone and the current state (e.g., completed, on track, ahead, behind, delinquent or inactive) of each task assigned to a user. A “completed” task is a task where all of the milestones have been completed. An “on track” task is a task that is not completed but where the user has not fallen behind the milestone completion schedule. An “ahead” task is a task where the user has completed the most recent milestone ahead of schedule. A “behind” task is a task where the user has failed to complete the currently due milestone on schedule. A “delinquent” task is one where the user has failed to complete more than one milestone on schedule, including the most recent milestone. Finally, an “inactive” task is one in which a user has indicated that the task is not to be tracked. Other types of task states are possible. The task monitor 124 generates events in the event log 102 when task state changes. For example, the task monitor 124 can generate the following event indicating that Mike Towers has completed the task Project Alfa (assuming that Code and test rate exchange software module milestone was the last milestone):
Time and Date: 11:35 PM, Mar. 2, 2014
Source: Task Monitor
User: Mike Towers
Task: Project Alpha
Type: Task State Event
Data: Completed
The task monitor 124 can also calculate measures of the overall system performance based on that status of all active events in the system and generate events for these measures in the event log 102. For example, performance measure M1 is calculated as follows:
where O is the number of on track tasks, A is the number of ahead tasks, and T is the total number of active tasks in the system. Performance measure M2 is calculated as follows:
Where B is the number of behind tasks, D is the number of delinquent tasks. Yet another measure could be the average of M1 or M2 over time:
User-defined rules can be triggered based on the performance measure events in the event log 102 and take action to improve the performance of the system by changing and/or redistributing tasks among users.
The rules engine 112 is the heart of the system and drives automatic task management through user-defined rules that perform actions automatically when the rules' conditions are satisfied. A rule can have the properties listed in TABLE 4, however other rule properties are possible. Rules are stored in the rule database 104. An application such as a web-based application can be provided as an end-user application 116 and offer the ability to define and modify rules through a graphical user interface, for example.
In some implementations, the rules engine 112 scans the event log 102 for new events —events that it has not processed previously. For each new event, the rules engine 112 then identifies any rules in the rules database 104 that have a task, or task and milestone, that matches the new event's corresponding task or task and milestone. If there is a match, the rules engine 112 evaluates each identified rule's conditions to determine if they are satisfied. A condition is a set of one or more Boolean expression that, if evaluate to true, will cause the rules engine 112 to perform the associated action(s). The Boolean expression can refer to intrinsic data such as properties of tasks, users, and events. In addition, the Boolean expression can refer to extrinsic data such as the time of day, weather conditions in a given location, news reports, and so on.
For example, when satisfied the following rule notifies a dispatcher that the user assigned to the task is 30 minutes away from arriving at a given geographic location:
Name: Package Notification
Description: Notify dispatcher when employee is near drop off
Task: Package Delivery
Milestone: Arrive at 3987 Oak Street, Pasadena, Calif. 91105.
Condition: Task.Predicted_arrival_time IS current_time+30 minutes
Action: NotifyDispatcher (“Task.user is 30 minutes away from delivering package.”)
The intrinsic data used in the condition of the above rule is the predicted arrival time for the task (Task.Predicted_arrival_time) which is determined using a Predicted User Arrival event from the event log 102 for the task and the user assigned to the task, and the identity of the user assigned to the task (Task.user) which is stored in the user database 108. A function NotifyDispatcher is defined by the system 122 and causes a message to be sent to the dispatcher (e.g., another user) associated with the task. The message can be in the form of a text message, an electronic mail message, a phone call, or other type of message.
By way of a further illustration, performance measurement events in the event log 102 can trigger rules that modify or reassign tasks in order to meet a system wide performance goal (e.g., M1, M2 or M3).
Name: Reassign Task
Description: Reassign a delinquent task to another user.
Task: Software Development
Milestone: Implement User API
Condition: System.M1<0.8 AND Task.state IS “delinquent” Action: ReassignTask (Task, Task.user)
The above rule reassigns delinquent Software Development tasks when the system performance drops below 80%. The intrinsic data used in the condition of the above rule is the system performance measure M1 (System.M1) which is obtained from the event log 102, and the task state (Task.state) for the Software Development task assigned to the user (Task.user) which can be obtained from the user database 108. The ReassignTask function is defined by the system 122 and reassigns the task from the assigned user to a new user.
By way of a further example, the following rule modifies a milestone date for a task whose state is behind to give the user more time to complete the milestone:
Name: Push out behind milestone
Description: Reassign a delinquent task to another user.
Task: Software Development
Milestone: Implement User API
Condition: Task.state IS “behind”
Action: PushOutMilestone (Milestone, Task.user, 2 weeks)
The intrinsic data used in the condition of the above rule is the task state (Task.state) for the Software Development task assigned to the user (Task.user) which can be obtained from the user database 108. The PushOutMilestone function is defined by the system 122 and moves the milestone completion data ahead two weeks for the given user and task. Other types of rules are possible.
As described above, user location tracking is performed by client devices (e.g., 128, 118, 122, and 124). A client device (e.g., client device 118) has software components installed on it for managing tasks assigned to the user of the client device and tracking the user's (i.e., the device's) location. The task manager 118a component provides a graphical user interface on the client device which allows the user to review milestone deliverables and schedules for their assigned tasks and can also automatically remind the user in advance when a scheduled milestone deadline is approaching. The task manager 118a also provides a graphical user interface (or other interface such as natural language) that allows a user to send a milestone status event to the server system 122 which will be entered into the event log by the task monitor 124. For example, the user can indicate through the user interface that a milestone has been completed or that a milestone was missed (and provide a reason).
Location tracker 118b is a software component that executes on the client device and that records the current geographic location information of the client device at different times and persistently stores the locations in data store 118d which retains its data across client device power cycles. In some implementations, the location tracker 118b treats the data store 118d as a stack with the most recently obtained geographic location information being “pushed” on top of the stack. In addition to location coordinates, the current geographical information can include the compass heading and speed of travel of the client device. In some implementations, the task manager 118a receives from the location monitor 114 a set of one or more time periods during which the location of the client device can be tracked and the location tracker 118b only tracks location during those times (e.g., working hours). The location tracker 118b obtains the current geographic location from an operating system (OS) service of the client device. The OS obtains the current location using Global Positioning System (GPS) or base station triangulation. Location information can be obtained from the OS even if the client device is in “airplane mode” since only transmit functionality of the radios on the client device are disabled, not the receive functionality. When transmitters on the client device are disabled, the location tracker 118b continues to obtain location data and stores it in data store 118d.
Network monitor 118c is a software component that executes on the client device and that is responsible for sending location information to the location monitor 114. When a transmitter is enabled on the client device the network monitor 118c will “pop” geographic location information off of the location stack in the data store 118d send the location information to the location monitor 114. The network monitor 118c monitors the performance of the transmitter used to transmit location information to the location monitor 114 and, if the performance is not acceptable either because the data rate is too slow or the channel has become unreliable, the network monitor 118c can use a different transmitter to transmit the location data. For example, if the cellular transmitter is performing poorly, the location information can be sent over the Wi-Fi transmitter (or vice versa).
The location tracker 118b utilize several parameters for its operation. The parameters are described in TABLE 5 below.
In some implementations, the location tracker 118b will discard location information obtained from the OS that does not satisfy accuracy thresholds. GPS locations having accuracies that do not exceed the ACCEPTABLE_GPS_ACCURACY are discarded (i.e., they are not stored in the data store 118d. Likewise, Wi-Fi triangulation locations having accuracies that do not exceed the ACCEPTABLE_NETWORK_ACCURACY are also discarded.
If a given geographic location has acceptable accuracy, then the location tracker 118b will determine whether or not the location should be pushed onto the location stack in the data store 118d based on an algorithm that decreases the amount of data transferred from the client device to the location monitor 114. The algorithm reduces the use of client device's transmitter (and therefore increases battery life of the client device) and provides the location monitor 114 with an easy to visualize path of travel by omitting redundant and unneeded location information. Based on the CURRENT_SPEED of the client device, the location tracker 118b performs operations in accordance with TABLE 6 below for location information obtained from the OS.
In some implementations, the location tracker 118b is a supervisory or other special process in the mobile device OS that cannot be terminated by users of the device. For example, on mobile devices running the Android operating system, the location tracker 118b is programmed as a persistent foreground service which runs at a higher priority than normal application processes. This prevents the operating system from randomly killing the process when the device needs to acquire more resources.
In further implementations, the location tracker 118b is programmed to lock the client device if the user disables the location tracker 118b. The location tracker 118b can also send a notification message to location monitor 114 indicating that the user has disabled location tracking. This can be recorded as an event in the event log 102 so that rules can perform actions on the occurrence of such events. For instance, the location tracker 118b can utilize an Android permission “device administrator” which grants it higher privileges than other applications and the ability to lock the client device, change its password, and erase the client device. In addition, the “device administrator” permission permits the location tracker 118b to detect when a user attempts to disable the location tracker 118b.
Embodiments of the subject matter and the operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions, encoded on computer storage medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively or in addition, the program instructions can be encoded on an artificially-generated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus for execution by a data processing apparatus. A computer storage medium can be, or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, a computer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory array or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover, while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computer storage medium can be a source or destination of computer program instructions encoded in an artificially-generated propagated signal. The computer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or more separate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, or other storage devices).
The operations described in this specification can be implemented as operations performed by a data processing apparatus on data stored on one or more computer-readable storage devices or received from other sources.
The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all kinds of apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, a system on a chip, or multiple ones, or combinations, of the foregoing. The apparatus can include special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). The apparatus can also include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, a cross-platform runtime environment, a virtual machine, or a combination of one or more of them. The apparatus and execution environment can realize various different computing model infrastructures, such as web services, distributed computing and grid computing infrastructures.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language resource), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform actions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing actions in accordance with instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device (e.g., a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive), to name just a few. Devices suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user by sending resources to and receiving resources from a device that is used by the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on a user's client device in response to requests received from the web browser.
Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component, e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes a front-end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described in this specification, or any combination of one or more such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), an inter-network (e.g., the Internet), and peer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks).
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In some embodiments, a server transmits data (e.g., an HTML page) to a client device (e.g., for purposes of displaying data to and receiving user input from a user interacting with the client device). Data generated at the client device (e.g., a result of the user interaction) can be received from the client device at the server.
A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any inventions or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.
Thus, particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4800521 | Carter et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5111391 | Fields et al. | May 1992 | A |
5185780 | Leggett | Feb 1993 | A |
5223844 | Mansell et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5276768 | Bander | Jan 1994 | A |
5541845 | Klein | Jul 1996 | A |
5712985 | Lee et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724243 | Westerlage et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745687 | Randell | Apr 1998 | A |
5809479 | Martin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5938720 | Tamai | Aug 1999 | A |
5943652 | Sisley et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6088679 | Barkley | Jul 2000 | A |
6192346 | Green | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6275812 | Haq et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327611 | Everingham | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349238 | Gabbita et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415259 | Wolfinger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6662237 | Leckie | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678714 | Olapurath et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6707421 | Drury et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728634 | Tabata et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6860422 | Hull et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6937993 | Gabbita et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6985872 | Benbassat et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7031728 | Beyer, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072765 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082473 | Breitbart et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110881 | Gray et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7149700 | Munoz et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155400 | Jilk et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155720 | Casati et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7222081 | Sone | May 2007 | B1 |
7222304 | Beaton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7280481 | Rong | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286489 | Ades | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310626 | Scarborough et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7330830 | Lamoureux et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7379062 | Poole | May 2008 | B2 |
7487106 | Levine et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499715 | Carro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503480 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539627 | Schmidt | May 2009 | B2 |
7546346 | Ouchi | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577706 | Arregui et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7596416 | Maluf et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7640548 | Yu et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7650293 | Kiran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657831 | Donahue | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694876 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7764954 | Beyer, Jr. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765121 | Pace et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769396 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797182 | Lindquist et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7849044 | Nelken | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869941 | Coughlin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870012 | Katz et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881957 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7908320 | Ludwig et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937655 | Teng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962358 | Fernandez et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7987051 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8015043 | Cao et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019622 | Kaboff et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027861 | Brintle | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8055279 | Murakami | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8108141 | Ehrlacher | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121888 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8126441 | Beyer, Jr. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8165792 | Mikan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170897 | Cohen et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8180376 | Merritt | May 2012 | B1 |
8208159 | Knodt et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8219432 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8229962 | Cavalancia, II | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8249807 | Barbeau et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8249810 | Jones | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255258 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8286183 | Baird et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290479 | Aaron et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301158 | Thomas | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312047 | Barker et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321527 | Martin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332249 | Aykin | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8332793 | Bose | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347295 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8369837 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370846 | Hayashi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386300 | April et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395547 | Dhanani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412154 | Leemet et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8423451 | Flaxman et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433341 | Dredge | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437954 | Freeman et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8473197 | Horvitz | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478526 | Chitre et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8498892 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8508767 | Carter et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509212 | Sanjeev et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8515801 | Guthrie | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521367 | Mulder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531289 | Scalisi et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538458 | Haney | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538688 | Prehofer | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553562 | Allan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554776 | Barak et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8558693 | Martin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559968 | Frank et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559977 | Busch | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560236 | Zahir et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565788 | Houri | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583090 | Vartiainen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583466 | Margulies et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588810 | Dai et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595041 | Schmidt | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606230 | Smith et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8606514 | Rowley et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611927 | Root et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612280 | Shepherd et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624727 | Saigh et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8626438 | Petzold et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8627323 | Owen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639543 | Boss et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8655677 | Reiner | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660877 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8686861 | Chung et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8687795 | Kosiba et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8694350 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8700310 | Jayanthi | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712811 | Fredericks et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8732574 | Burr et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738401 | Reynolds et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745220 | Raleigh et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8776073 | Morlen | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8942727 | Roman et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
20020022982 | Cooperstone et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029161 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052770 | Podrazhansky | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087382 | Tiburcio | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111842 | Miles | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129139 | Ramesh | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030050821 | Brandt et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055706 | Statfeld | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030191680 | Dewar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030214657 | Stringham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216926 | Scotto et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019504 | Korom et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039520 | Khavakh et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078373 | Ghoneimy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124977 | Biffar | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177095 | West | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196184 | Hollander et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210464 | Belanger et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267592 | Ogushi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027696 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060217 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068980 | Mathew et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096961 | Schaaf et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102394 | Loveland | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138031 | Wefers | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149376 | Guyan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050222881 | Booker | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246216 | Rosen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060083267 | Laroia et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094350 | Ishimura et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106846 | Schulz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117012 | Rizzolo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143107 | Dumas et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147882 | Sambucetti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155460 | Raney | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217876 | Houri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241857 | Onishi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282306 | Thissen-Roe | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032225 | Konicek et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043603 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070075518 | Murata | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129983 | Scherpbier et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070192157 | Gooch | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208606 | Mackay et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244736 | Johnson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276713 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004933 | Gillespie | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034347 | V et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040193 | Dion | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045234 | Reed | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046862 | Sattler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080070561 | Keum et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077530 | Banas et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088438 | Aninye | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091782 | Jakobson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097827 | Leach et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103868 | Santos et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162242 | Schneur et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164998 | Scherpbier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243575 | Weinberger | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244589 | Darnell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270214 | Eiby et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270546 | Morris et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288539 | Jacobs | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294504 | Mortensen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294505 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306806 | Van Wyk et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006164 | Kaiser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019051 | Winburn | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037880 | Adger, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063217 | Barros | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077165 | Rhodes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089737 | Komatsu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113428 | Huff | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090147940 | Graves et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090149192 | Vargas et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210148 | Jayanthi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222299 | Clemenson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228198 | Goldberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235225 | Killisperger et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240553 | Sato | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090291665 | Gaskarth et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292463 | Chase | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299811 | Verfuerth et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100083253 | Kushwaha | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121566 | Joshi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131124 | Klooster | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161371 | Cantor et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173647 | Sheynblat | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174577 | Duffy et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184452 | Choi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191454 | Shirai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198934 | Ouchi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223557 | Kenney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100289644 | Slavin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110022503 | Parker-Yules | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060807 | Martin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066468 | Huang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106736 | Aharonson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126158 | Fogarty et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131075 | Robertson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154338 | Ramanathaiah et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159884 | Chawla | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178945 | Hirai | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184771 | Wells | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208557 | Gonzalez Diaz et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246564 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276896 | Zambetti et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282829 | Rangaswamy et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120016710 | Santos et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120040640 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042003 | Goetz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072253 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072268 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079409 | Luo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095925 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096463 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109700 | Cook et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110087 | Culver et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129510 | Bradburn | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130727 | Ahmed | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158865 | Kurian et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159488 | Kurian et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166266 | Rampalli et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179504 | Nakashima | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197670 | Poon | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203588 | Burri et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209649 | Ovenden et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209650 | Romagnino et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209706 | Ramer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210252 | Fedoseyeva et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215578 | Swierz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227044 | Arumugham et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240122 | Brown et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246654 | Eichenberger et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254153 | Abraham et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291041 | Cipar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302256 | Pai et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304187 | Maresh et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310445 | Hatton et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311585 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317209 | Briggs | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320407 | Hoarau et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006521 | Needham et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130012234 | Tufty et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130012802 | Horseman | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013996 | Wu | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024231 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130040600 | Reitnour et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041707 | Bose et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054646 | Zizka et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130066646 | Backhaus et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090968 | Borza | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096813 | Geffner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102283 | Lau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110392 | Kosseifi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115969 | Holmes et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124254 | Jafri et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145300 | Mackay et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159908 | Mayerle et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165153 | Turk et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173640 | Allrich et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179208 | Chung et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181867 | Sturdivant et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212521 | Fedoseyeva et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217364 | Varoglu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226639 | Yokoyama et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130260785 | Shakespeare et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262174 | Singh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290063 | Gonzalez Diaz et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290200 | Singhal | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295910 | Enty et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311160 | Cowie | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318533 | Aghassipour et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332214 | George et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344891 | Hotes et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006077 | Davis | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006078 | McGauley et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006519 | Guenther et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019187 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032326 | Li et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036905 | Yilmaz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039953 | Mcquillan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039954 | Wong et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040028 | King et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140045457 | Mahaffey et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140045534 | Mahaffey et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053096 | Alonso Lago | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058674 | Shekhar et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059557 | Kramer | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074743 | Rademaker | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081691 | Wendell | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082521 | Carolan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089822 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095236 | Podgurny et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108094 | Beddo et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108397 | Zubizarreta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114727 | Shan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148141 | Snapp | May 2014 | A1 |
20140159483 | Robertazzi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164044 | DeRoller | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140195274 | Annappindi | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195290 | Plost et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219373 | Mobasher et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140274121 | Raniere | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140295850 | Lee | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298207 | Ittah et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364099 | Pai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150079965 | Mullins | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013100749 | Jul 2013 | AU |
2279191 | Aug 1998 | CA |
2305479 | Nov 2000 | CA |
2514824 | Jun 2004 | CA |
2568216 | Feb 2005 | CA |
2617768 | Feb 2007 | CA |
2571785 | Mar 2007 | CA |
2701367 | Oct 2010 | CA |
2744473 | Dec 2011 | CA |
1891008 | Jan 2007 | CN |
102505591 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102523155 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103534685 | Jan 2014 | CN |
1367513 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1473649 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1532600 | May 2005 | EP |
1680727 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2290907 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2336958 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2385476 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2458531 | May 2012 | EP |
2660745 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2454310 | May 2009 | GB |
2008054026 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008217719 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009151472 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009199251 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009205341 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2013029873 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013045418 | Mar 2013 | JP |
201324451 | Jun 2013 | TW |
201340028 | Oct 2013 | TW |
WO-9305492 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO-0221403 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0246884 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-02101623 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03038658 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-2004001613 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004086267 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004102431 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005006125 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005013075 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2006019271 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006074065 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2007061264 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007071913 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007081823 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008007983 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008082789 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008094552 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2008144645 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2009012316 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009079609 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2009102728 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2010030917 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010062585 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2010096772 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO-2011105997 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2012089284 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2012095456 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2012151216 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012167168 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013015809 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013050586 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074377 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013159974 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2013155255 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2013186519 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO-2014001549 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014023851 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014026023 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014068314 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,098, filed Apr. 11, 2014, User Location Tracking, Anthony C. Roman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,774, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Communication Management System, Anthony Christopher Roman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,783, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Document Workflow System, Anthony Christopher Roman. |
“Smart Phone + Mail Server = Location Tracking,” accessed on the internet at http://blog.spiderlabs.com/2012/09/smart-phone-mail-server-locationtracking.html; downloaded Apr. 8, 2014; 5pgs. |
“Track My People Solution,” accessed on the Internet at http://www.craveinfotech.com/track-people-solution.aspx; downloaded Apr. 8, 2014; 2pgs. |
“State-of-the Art Fleet Management and Vehicle Tracking Solution to Increase Your Productivity,” accessed on the internet at http://www.maptell.com/download/maptellZorbaATS.pdf; downloaded Apr. 8, 2014; 7pgs. |
“Mobile Tracker (U Safe Tracker),” accessed on the internet at https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=homesoft.app.falcontracker&hl=en; downloaded Apr. 8, 2014; 3pgs. |
Padmavathy et al., “An Efficient Tracking of Human Mobility and Events Based on WPS Using Android Technology,” Int J Adv Computational Eng and Networking; 1(9):57-61; Nov. 2013. |
“GPS Employee Tracking,” accessed on the internet at http://gpsemployeetracking .com/features; downloaded Mar. 9, 2014; 7pgs. |
“US Fleet & Mobile Workforce Tracking | Mobile Resource & Asset Management,” accessed on the internet at http://www.mygeotracking.com/products-mobile-workforce-fleet-tracking-mobile-marketing; downloaded Mar. 9, 2014; 6pgs. |
“Tracking Employee Mobile Phone Is Critical,” accessed on the internet at http://www.phonesheriff.com/employee-mobile-tracking.html; downloaded Mar. 9, 2014; 11pgs. |
“Stealth Genie Features,” accessed on the internet at http://stealthgenie.com/features.html; downloaded Mar. 9, 2014; 11pgs. |
“TeleNaV Track,” accessed on the internet at http://enterprise.telenav.com/solutions.html; downloaded Mar. 9, 2014; 3pgs. |
“Workforce Optimization: Identification and Assignment of Professional Workers Using Constraint Programming,” accessed on the internet at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5388666&matchBoolean%3Dtrue%26searchField%3DSearch—All%26queryText%3D%28%28p—Abstract%3Atask+assignment%29+AND+p—Abstract%3Alocation+and+skill%29, May 2007; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 2pgs. |
“Employee Positioning and Workload Allocation,” accessed on the internet at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054806001031, Feb. 2008; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 1pg. |
“Workforce Management,” accessed on the internet at http://www.aspect.com/resourcecatalog/aspect-healthcare-workforce-management-ds.pdf; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 5pgs. |
“Staff Optimization—A Prescription for Superior Patient Outcomes,” accessed on the internet at http://www.aspect.com/resourcecatalog/staff-optimization-wp.pdf; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 3pgs. |
“Simulation Tool for Manpower Forecast Loading and Resource Leveling,” accessed on the internet at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4419842&queryText%3Dmanpower+requirement+forecasting, Dec. 2007; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 2pgs. |
“The Concept of Manpower Forecasts,” accessed on the internet at http://www.businessteacher.org.uk/essays/finance/the-concept-of-manpower-forecasts.php; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 10pgs. |
“ForecastPro-Predictions Your Business Can Rely On,” accessed on the internet at http://www.invisionwfm.com/products/forecasting/forecastpro; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 3pgs. |
“Labor Planning and Automation in a 3p1 Environment,” accessed on the internet at http://www.accellos.com/about-us/resources/white-papers/thank-labor-planning-automation; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 5pgs. |
“The Shortest Path: Comparison of Different Approaches and Implementation for the Automatic Routing of Vehicles,” accessed on the internet at http://informs-sim.org/wsc12papers/includes/files/con231.pdf; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 12pgs. |
“Employee Transport Management System,” accessed on the internet at http://www.aticdata.com/employee.aspx; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 2pgs. |
“Using GPS Data to Understand Variations in Path Choice,” accessed on the internet at https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/horowitz/www/pathchoice.pdf; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 12pgs. |
““Simplest” Paths: Automated Route Selection for Navigation,” accessed on the internet at http://www.geosensor.net/papers/sp8.pdf; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 18pgs. |
“The Traveling Salesman Goes Shopping: The Systematic Deviations of Grocery Paths from TSP Optimality,” accessed on the internet at http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mksc.1080.0402; downloaded Jul. 28, 2014; 1pg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,774, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Communication Management System, Anthony Christopher Roman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,783, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Document Workflow System, Anthony Christopher Roman et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA/EP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/037275 dated Sep. 10, 2015; 10pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/597,689, filed Jan. 15, 2015, User Location Tracking, Roman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,200, filed May 29, 2015, User Location Tracking, Roman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,774, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Communication Management System, Roman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,783, filed Jul. 11, 2014, Document Workflow System, Roman et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/012771 dated Apr. 8, 2015; 9pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150295877 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |