Patent Grant
6959233
The present invention relates generally to verbal communication based train management systems for “non-signaled” territories, and more particularly to an automated voice transmission method and system for authorizing the movement of trains in such non-signaled territories.
North American railroads currently operate trains in what is commonly called “signaled” and “non-signaled” territories. In signaled territories, the authorization for the locomotive engineer (locomotive driver) to move the train along the track is via wayside signals. These signals are analogous to traffic lights for private motor vehicles operating on highways. Signaled territory will support a greater number of trains per hour than non-signaled territory, but also requires an expensive infrastructure.
In non-signaled territory, the authorization for the locomotive engineer to move the train along the track is via a verbal movement authority. The non-signaled territory movement authority is generated by a train dispatcher located at a central train dispatching office. The dispatcher is typically aided in the generation of the movement authority by a conventional computer aided movement authority computer which is programmed to help assure that only non-conflicting authorities are generated. The movement authority is then read to the locomotive engineer via a voice radio communications system. The locomotive engineer writes the movement authority on a prescribed form and then reads it back to the dispatcher for confirmation. The dispatcher confirms that the locomotive engineer has read it correctly and the movement authority is then considered “in effect.” This method of movement authority granting is time consuming and prone to human error. The read/read-back method does little for enhancing the safety of the operations.
Consequently, there is a need for a system and method for granting movement authority in non-signaled territories which is both more efficient and less prone to human error than the present verbal movement authority procedure described above.
The invention provides an automated voice transmission method and system for authorizing the movement of trains in non-signaled territories. According to the invention, a dispatcher can generate a non-verbal movement authority for a designated train in non-signaled territory. The non-verbal movement authority can then be converted to verbal form, such as by using voice synthesis, and then transmitted to the designated train. The verbal movement authority can be received and listened to by a locomotive engineer on the designated train, after which the engineer will transmit either acceptance or rejection of the movement authority back to the dispatcher. The dispatcher may then transmit to the engineer on the designated locomotive a confirmation that the acceptance or rejection was received.
Preferably, security provisions can also be provided, such as, for example, requiring the locomotive engineer to use a secure code to receive the movement authority and/or when transmitting the acceptance or rejection message back to the dispatcher. As an added safety measure, the initial non-verbal movement authority can also be transmitted to the designated train as a text message displayed on a screen on-board the locomotive. The locomotive engineer can use the text message to confirm that the verbal message was heard correctly.
The dispatcher can be aided in the generation of an initial digital non-verbal movement authority by conventional computer aided movement authority computers which are programmed to help assure that only non-conflicting authorities are generated. A movement authority transmission voice synthesizer then converts the digitized authority into spoken words that adhere to current railroad operating rules pertaining to the spelling out of location names and mile post numbers.
Train position coordinates can be correlated with the movement authority to be issued, in order to instruct conventional railroad voice radio communications dispatch office equipment to automatically select the appropriate voice radio base station, i.e., the base station closest to the designated train, via which the movement authority will be communicated. The voice synthesized movement authority will then be transmitted to the locomotive engineer on the designated train. The train location coordinates can be derived from GPS position reports and/or locomotive identification reports. The train position information can be transmitted from the locomotive on the designated train via, for example, a conventional voice radio transceiver, and can be received by, for example, a conventional railroad voice radio communications system. On board the locomotive, GPS position reports can be derived from a commercially available GPS receiver, converted into very short data messages, and then transmitted periodically via sub-audible techniques that are currently utilized in conventional voice radio communication networks.
Other details, objects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings figures of certain embodiments thereof.
A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures, in which:
Referring now to the drawing figures, a block diagram of an embodiment of system for the automated voice transmission of movement authorities in a railroad non-signaled territory is depicted in
At the desired time, a train dispatcher can generate a non-verbal, non-signaled movement authority using, for example, a conventional computer aided movement authority generator 1. Computer aided movement authority generation computers and their operation are well known. These computers have software which assists the dispatcher in generating the movement authority and assures that only non-conflicting authorities are generated. Non-conflicting movement authorities are those which permit only a single train to occupy a specific section of track at any given time, thus preventing train collisions. Conventional operation still requires the read and read-back scenario as described previously.
The non-verbal movement authority generated by the movement authority generator 1 is delivered, for example in a digitized format, to a device which converts the non-verbal movement authority into verbal form. This device can be, for example, a movement authority transmission voice synthesizer 2. The movement authority transmission voice synthesizer 2 converts the digitized non-verbal authority into spoken words, in a format which adheres to current railroad operating rules pertaining to location names and mile post numbers.
Generally, the verbal movement authority is then transmitted by a first voice communications device, for example by conventional, existing railroad voice communications dispatch office equipment 5, to the designated train 101 where it is received by a second voice communications device, for example a conventional on-board locomotive voice radio transceiver 10b. More particularly, according to one presently preferred embodiment of the invention, the system includes a train position decoder 4 which correlates the position coordinates of the designated train 101 with the particular movement authority to be issued. The train position decoder 4 selects, via the existing railroad voice radio communications dispatch office equipment 5, an appropriate third voice communications device, for example a voice radio base station 7. Specifically, the voice radio base station 7 closest to the designated train 101 will be selected by the train position decoder 4 to transmit the verbal movement authority to the designated train 101. The voice synthesized movement authority is thus communicated from the dispatch office to the nearest base station 7 via an existing audio circuit 6 and thence to the designated train 101.
The position coordinates for the designated train 101 can be derived from GPS position reports 9, for example via a conventional GPS receiver 10d and sub-audio train position encoder 10c, shown in
Prior to transmitting the voice synthesized, verbal movement authority to the locomotive engineer, or other train crew member, on the designated train 101, the system determines whether the train crew member is ready to receive the verbal authority. According to the invention, the system, i.e., the train dispatch office, can announce over the appropriate voice radio base station 7, selected as described above, that it has a message for the designated train 101. The engineer on the designated train 101 then notifies, such as via the same voice radio base station, the dispatch office that it may transmit the movement authority. A secure code may be employed, which can be generated by a secure code generator 10e and transmitted from the designated train 101 to the dispatch office, for example, via a Dual Tone Multiple Frequency (DTMF) key pad 10a, which is incorporated in most modern day train communication systems.
The secure code transmitted from the designated train 101 must match the secure code that is expected by the dispatch office voice communications equipment 5, and in particular the movement authority train crew acknowledgement verifier 3, before the movement authority can be transmitted. A secure code generator 11 at the dispatch office generates the secure code which must be matched by the secure code transmitted from the designated train 101.
According to the invention, there can be a secure code generator 10e located on-board a locomotive of each train, of which train 101 is an example, and a non-signaled territory movement authority secure code generator 11 resident at the train dispatch office. The secure code generators can employ, for example, a very precise internal clock and a multiple digit number generation algorithm. This provides a means for identical numbers to be generated at both the dispatch office and on-board each train 101. The secure code generator 10e on-board the train 101 can utilize conventional technology.
The non-signaled territory movement authority generation secure code generator logic can use the same secure code generation algorithms as on-board each train 101 to assure that there is a unique code for each train 101 and each movement authority. Also, to help assure uniqueness among codes, the lead locomotive identification on the designated train 101 can be used as part of the acknowledgement message transmitted off board the train 101.
After the crew on the designated train 101 enters a valid secure code via the DTMF pad 10a, and the code and locomotive identification are confirmed by the movement authority train crew acknowledgement verifier 3, the synthesized voice movement authority will be transmitted to the designated train 101.
According to the invention, the engineer, or crew member, on-board the designated train 101 can write the received verbal movement authority onto a prescribed form, just as it is conventionally done in non-signaled territory operations. If desired by the railroad, both the locomotive engineer and the conductor on the designated train 101 can be required to independently acknowledge the movement authority via separate DTMF microphones. It should be noted that most locomotives today are equipped with separate microphones for the conductor and engineer.
If the train crew has copied the movement authority, understands it, and is ready to operate the train in adherence to the movement authority, the next step is to acknowledge the receipt of the movement authority. The acknowledgment process can also rely upon the use of the secure code procedure described above. If the train crew accepts the movement authority the secure code numbers followed by the letter “A” (for accept) are entered via the DTMF pad 10a. If the movement authority is rejected, the secure code numbers are entered followed by the letter “R” (for reject). If the movement authority is rejected, the movement authority train crew acknowledgement verifier 3 can automatically notify the train dispatch office.
As an added safety measure, the initial generated non-verbal movement authority can also be transmitted to the designated train as a text message, and displayed on a screen on-board the designated train 101. An existing display screen on-board the locomotive of the designated train 101 can be used if available, otherwise a simple display device can be provided. The text message can be used as a back-up to the verbal movement authority. The locomotive engineer can use the text message to confirm that the verbal message was heard, and written down, correctly.
The use of the secure code technique can prevent the false acknowledgment of a movement authority by unauthorized personnel or by crew members on a train other than the designated train 101. Another means for securing safety of operations can be to employ conventional, currently available voice encrypting techniques. The movement authority transmission voice synthesizer 2 could transmit an encryption access code to the designated train 101. The voice communications radio 10b on-board the train 101 would then switch to a mode wherein that radio 10b, and only that radio, would be capable of decrypting the voice message. The acknowledgement process would adhere to the technique described above and would also be encrypted.
Although certain embodiments of the invention have been described in detail hereinabove, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications to those details could be developed in light of the overall teaching of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular embodiments disclosed herein are intended to be illustrative only and not limiting to the scope of the invention which should be awarded the full breadth of the following claims and any and all embodiments thereof.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/417,433, filed Oct. 10, 2002.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3678391 | Gough | Jul 1972 | A |
| 4307859 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4711418 | Aver et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 5452870 | Heggestad | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5533695 | Heggestad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5828979 | Polivka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5950966 | Hungate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6295449 | Westerlage et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6366782 | Fumarolo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6466847 | Horst | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6823242 | Ralph | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040176884 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60417433 | Oct 2002 | US |
