This application is a U.S. national stage filing of International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/41116, filed on Apr. 20, 2009.
The present disclosure generally relates to safety control systems, and more particularly, relates to devices and methods for automatically adjusting and calibrating parameters within a safety control system for conveyors.
Conveyors, such as escalators, travelators, moving walkways, and the like, provide a moving pathway to quickly and conveniently transport people from one location to another. More specifically, the moving pallets or steps of a conveyor move passengers along the length of the pathway between two landing platforms at predetermined rates of speed. Step chains hidden from view and disposed underneath the conveyor serve to interconnect each of the steps in a closed loop fashion. Driven by a main drive source, drive shafts and associated sprockets, the step chains move the steps along an exposed upper surface of the conveyor to transport passengers between the landing platforms. Sprockets disposed within each of the two landing platforms guide the step chains through an arc to reverse the direction of step movement and to create a cyclic return path.
Because of their continual motion, conveyors are prone to various internal failures, which may further cause injury to passengers on or near the conveyor. One such failure is associated with the speed of the conveyor, or the velocity at which the steps of a conveyor travel between landing platforms. The speed of the conveyor may deviate or fluctuate from a predefined nominal speed causing the steps of a conveyor to move too fast, too slow, stop abruptly, accelerate too quickly, or the like. Inconsistencies in the speed of a conveyor may be caused by several factors. However, in most occurrences, inconsistencies in the speed of a conveyor may be caused by fluctuations in the power supplied to the main drive source of the conveyor. For instance, overvoltage, undervoltage, power surges, spikes, or other inconsistencies in the power supplied to the conveyor, may cause variations to the conveyor which accumulate over time and ultimately offset a predefined nominal speed thereof. Power fluctuations may also hinder the ability of the conveyor to stop within predefined times or distances as required by safety protocols.
Other failures pertain to misaligned or missing pallets or steps. Over time, one or more steps of a conveyor may break loose from the associated step chains causing the steps to drop or fall beneath the conveyor system undetected. Missing steps may also be caused by improper maintenance. Conveyors require periodic maintenance in which one or more steps may be removed, replaced, or the like. However, if a step is not properly fastened or realigned with the step chains, the step may break loose and fall. In any event, if a control system of a conveyor fails to detect a void caused by a missing step, the conveyor may continue to operate, advance the void to the upper surface of the conveyor and expose the void to passengers. Unknowing passengers may fall or step into the void and become injured.
Accordingly, escalators and travelators are provided with various safety measures which serve to minimize hazards caused by such fault conditions. For instance, periodic maintenance may be performed on site by service technicians to ensure proper operation of the conveyor. However, such maintenance is timely, costly and introduces the risk of human error. Other safety measures may employ safety monitoring devices. Specifically, conveyors may be provided with a safety monitoring device which monitors operation of the conveyor for fault conditions. When a fault has been detected, safety monitoring devices may be configured to transmit correctional instructions to a control unit of the conveyor or simply halt operation of the conveyor until the fault is manually cleared by a service technician. However, conveyors may also be required to operate in compliance with safety codes and regulations associated a conveyor type, location, application, and the like. As the type, location and application of each conveyor is different, the safety monitoring device associated with each conveyor must also be different.
In particular, the safety monitoring device for each conveyor must be specifically designed, configured and preprogrammed for that particular conveyor, which amounts to a considerable amount of time and money spent for building each conveyor system. This also means that existing safety devices are not adaptable to any other conveyor type or application, and further, cannot be upgraded to comply with changing conditions, such as new conveyor safety codes and regulations. In order to comply with changing safety codes and regulations, currently existing safety devices, or the conveyor system as a whole, may need to be replaced. Such a service requires a considerable amount of money as well as downtime for the end user.
Therefore, there is a need for a robust and universal control system which monitors the safety parameters of a conveyor system in a more timely and cost efficient manner. More specifically, there is a need for a safety control system that is adaptable to a wide variety of different conveyor types and local safety regulations, and further, monitors conveyor step presence, step speed, stopping distance, and other safety control parameters. Furthermore, there is a need for a control system which automatically determines the operational and mechanical characteristics of an associated conveyor, self-calibrates the necessary safety parameters, and monitors the parameters according to safety codes specific to the conveyor.
In accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, an apparatus for automatically adjusting safety control parameters of a conveyor having a plurality of steps extending between a first platform and a second platform, the steps being interconnected by a step chain and driven by a main drive component is provided. The apparatus comprises a plurality of sensors configured to output at least a step speed signal and a step detection signal; and a safety control module in communication with the sensors and in communication with a conveyor control unit, the safety control module configured to automatically determine operational and mechanical characteristics of the conveyor based on outputs of the sensors, validate the operational characteristics of the conveyor based on predefined nominal specifications, and determine safety control parameters corresponding to the validated operational characteristics of the conveyor by which to monitor conveyor operation.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, a method for automatically adjusting safety control parameters of a conveyor having a plurality of steps extending between a first platform and a second platform, the steps being interconnected by a step chain and driven by a main drive component is provided. The method comprises the steps of determining operational and mechanical characteristics of the conveyor based on outputs of a step speed sensor and a step detection sensor; validating the operational characteristics of the conveyor based on predefined nominal specifications; and determining safety control parameters corresponding to the validated operational characteristics of the conveyor by which to monitor conveyor operation.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the disclosure, a method for automatically adjusting safety control parameters of a conveyor having a plurality of steps extending between a first platform and a second platform, the steps being interconnected by a step chain and driven by a main drive component is provided. The method comprises the steps of sampling output signals of a step speed sensor and a step detection sensor for a predefined period of time; determining a measured step speed based on the step speed output signal; determining step speed sensor type based on a frequency of the step speed output signal; determining conveyor step size based on a correlation between the step speed and step detection output signals; comparing the measured step speed with a predefined step speed; comparing a cross-correlation between sensor output signals with a predefined tolerance; and determining safety control parameters only if both of the measured step speed and the cross-correlation between sensor output signals are within predefined tolerances.
These and other aspects of this disclosure will become more readily apparent upon reading the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments thereof have been shown in the drawings and will be described below in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to be limited to the specific forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling with the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Referring to the drawings and with particular reference to
As shown in
Still referring to
Referring now to
Once all of the required data of the conveyor 10a are obtained, the safety control module 200a may validate the sampled data, or compare the sampled data with predefined nominal values and thresholds. The predefined values may include nominal conveyor step speeds, step sizes, and the like, as set forth by local safety codes and regulations. The predefined values may also incorporate constraints or limitations introduced by other guidelines, such as contract-specific requirements, user-defined preferences, or the like. If the sampled data is within an acceptable threshold of the predefined nominal value, the safety control module 200a may proceed to determine an appropriate safety function and corresponding safety control parameters specific to the conveyor 10a. However, if the sampled data is not within an acceptable threshold of the predefined nominal values, the safety control module 200a may reject the sampled data and proceed to obtain subsequent samples of conveyor data until validation is successful. If the sampled data is valid and in accordance with respective safety codes and regulations, the safety control module 200a may automatically generate a new safety function specific to the conveyor, or automatically adjust an existing safety function previously stored within the safety device 100a. More specifically, the safety control module 200a may calibrate safety control parameters to the predefined values and store the safety control parameters within the safety device 100a for reference.
Using the safety function as a reference, the safety control module 200a may further monitor conveyor 10a operation for any significant deviation from nominal specifications. If such a deviation is detected, the safety control module 200a may communicate the necessary signals to the conveyor control unit 90a for correcting the error. For instance, if the safety device 100a detects a significant increase in the conveyor step speed, the safety control module 200a may instruct the control unit 90a to decelerate. In response, the control unit 90a may reduce power to a motor driving the conveyor 10a, or the like, so as to reduce the conveyor step speed. Once the conveyor step speed returns to a speed that is within acceptable bounds, as set forth by the stored safety function, the safety control module 200a may instruct the control unit 90a to stop deceleration and maintain the current step speed. Accordingly, the conveyor control unit 90a may then maintain the power delivered to the motor.
Referring back to the embodiment of
As disclosed herein, a learn-run 300 may be an algorithm that is preprogrammed within a microprocessor, microcontroller, or the like, to operate according to the steps, as schematically illustrated by the flow diagram of
Once all of the preconditions are met and the necessary predefined inputs are received by the safety control module 200, the learn-run 300 may wait for manual input or instructions by a user to initiate the learn-run 300. Upon receiving instructions to initiate, the learn-run 300 may first execute a learn sequence 302. During the learn sequence 302, the learn-run 300 may observe normal operation conditions of the conveyor 10 using various sensors 102, 104, 106, 108 for a predefined period of time. For example, the learn sequence 302 may sample data measured by a step speed sensor 102, step detection sensors 104, 106, a handrail sensor 108, and the like, over a period of 40 seconds or so. Based on the sampled data, the learn sequence 302 may then perform averages and additional calculations to derive key characteristics of the conveyor 10. In particular, the learn sequence 302 may be configured to calculate the measured step speed of the conveyor 10, the average period of each step detection signal, the average period of the of the step speed signal, the average number of step speed signal pulses per period of the step detection signals, the average frequency of the step speed signal, the average period of the handrail signal, and the like. Using such derivations, the learn-run 300 may be able to determine various mechanical traits of the specific conveyor 10. Specifically, the learn sequence 302 may be able to determine the type of step speed sensor 102 being used, proximity or encoder, based on the frequency of the step speed signal provided by the step speed sensor 102. The learn sequence 302 may also determine the conveyor step size, depth and/or pitch, based on the number of step speed signal pulses per period of the step detection signals.
After learning operational and mechanical characteristics of the conveyor 10 during the learn sequence 302, the learn-run 300 may then proceed to the validation sequence 304 of
If the validation sequence 304 is successful, the learn-run 300 may proceed to the calibration sequence 306, as shown in
Based on the foregoing, it can be seen that the present disclosure may provide conveyors, such as escalators, travelators, moving walkways, and the like, with safety devices that overcome deficiencies in the prior art. More specifically, the present disclosure provides a safety control device which can automatically adapt to any one of a wide variety of conveyor types and simultaneously ensure compliance with safety codes and regulations specific to the conveyor. By being adaptable, the safety control module facilitates the manufacture, installation and maintenance of conveyors in any environment. By being automatic, the safety control module minimizes downtime and expenses required for servicing conveyors. Furthermore, by reducing the need for maintenance by service technicians, the safety control module additionally minimizes faults introduced by human error.
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/041116 | 4/20/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/15/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/123489 | 10/28/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5361887 | Zaharia et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5842554 | Stoxen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6112166 | Joosten | Aug 2000 | A |
6230871 | Balzer-Apke et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267219 | Spannhake et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273234 | Balzer-Apke et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7520806 | Bundy et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7544918 | Herzog | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20030168311 | Balzer-Apke et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20070072158 | Unuma et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090266674 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110011700 | Plathin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101386395 | Jun 2011 | CN |
19754141 | Jun 1999 | DE |
H0455289 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H0485292 | Mar 1992 | JP |
H09510170 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2004505874 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004123348 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2009073621 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009073621 | Apr 2009 | JP |
WO 9818712 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120043180 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |