The present invention generally relates to an apparatus for stacking sheets of material. More specifically, the present invention relates to an apparatus for changing the angle of discharge of a conveyor for stacking sheets of corrugated material.
Devices for stacking sheets of material, such as sheets of corrugated material, are well known. One example of a commercially available device is the AGS2000 Rotary Die Cut Stacker made by the assignee of the present invention, A.G. Machine, Inc., Weyers Cave, Va. Further examples of such devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,321,202 to Martin and U.S. Pat. No. 3,419,266 to Martin, each of which is expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In operation, the main conveyor 106 is pivoted about the pivot point to lower the discharge end 110 of the conveyor to an initial position. (The illustrated position illustrates the conveyor raised to an upper position.) Sheets are fed onto the main conveyor 106 at its intake end 108, transported along the distance of the conveyor to its discharge end 110, and discharged from the conveyor. The sheets are discharged with sufficient momentum to strike a backstop 118 in the accumulator section 116 that stops the forward momentum of the sheets. The stopped sheets settle down, typically onto a discharge conveyor, to form a stack of sheets. As additional sheets are placed on the stack, the main conveyor 106 is pivoted to raise the discharge end vertically so that the discharged sheets are stacked one by one.
Once a stack of sheets is completed, to permit time to carry the stack of sheets away without stopping the machine, the accumulator section 116 is activated by activating catcher elements 120. The catcher elements 120 hold sheets in the accumulator section while the previously formed stack is removed. After the stack is removed, the main conveyor 106 is lowered and the accumulator section 116 is deactivated by withdrawing the catcher elements 120. The accumulated sheets are dropped to form a new stack of sheets.
One drawback to conventional stackers such as this is that the discharged sheets sometimes become interlocked and jammed in the accumulator. This occurs partially because the angle of discharge of the conveyor varies. When the main conveyor is placed at the position shown in
There have been attempts to address this issue, and one common method is the use of forced air. Forced air is blown underneath a discharged sheet to form a cushion so that discharged sheets settle more uniformly. Forced air has proven to be useful, yet it also has drawbacks. The forced air can vary in intensity and location, thereby preventing blanks from being adequately diverted. Furthermore, the trajectory and force of the air is not always sufficient to assure that sheets are properly seated into the accumulator.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved apparatus for stacking sheets that guides corrugated blanks into an accumulator in a manner that minimizes, or prevents, interlock jamming in the accumulator.
An object of the present invention is to solve at least the above problems and/or disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described below. Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a conveyor with a discharge mechanism for guiding and seating blanks in an accumulator.
In accordance with an object of the invention, an apparatus for stacking sheets includes a base and a conveyor pivotably mounted to the base. The conveyor receives sheets at an intake end, transports the sheets, and discharging the sheets from a discharge end. A plurality of pivotable slats are located at the discharge end of the conveyor. The pivotable slats can be raised and lowered to adjust the angle of discharge of discharged sheets.
In accordance with another object of the invention, a conveyor for a device for stacking sheets has a conveyor frame with an intake end and a discharge end. A conveyor is disposed on the conveyor frame for receiving sheets at the intake end, transporting the sheets, and discharging the sheets from the discharge end. A plurality of pivotable slats are located at the discharge end of the conveyor for adjusting the angle of discharge of discharged sheets. An accumulator receives sheets discharged from the discharge end of the conveyor to form a uniform stack of sheets.
In accordance with yet another object of the invention, an apparatus for adjusting the angle of discharge of sheets being discharged from a discharge end of a conveyor in a sheet stacking device has shaft support members located at the discharge end of the conveyor. A support shaft is rotatably disposed in the shaft support members. A plurality of slats are provided with each slat having a first end and a second end. The second end of each slat is connected to the support shaft. An actuator is connected to the support shaft to rotate the support shaft.
Other objects, advantages, and salient features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses preferred embodiments of the invention.
Referring to the drawings which form a part of this disclosure:
Throughout the drawings, the same drawing reference numerals will be understood to refer to the same elements, features, and structures.
The matters defined in the description such as a detailed construction and elements are provided to assist in a comprehensive understanding of the embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Also, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions are omitted for clarity and conciseness.
Referring initially to
The main conveyor 304 has an intake end 316 and a discharge end 318.
A pair of bearings 332 are mounted on the right and left frame members 320 and 322 to hold a support shaft 334 so that it may rotate. A plurality of support brackets 336 are mounted on the underside of the deck tubes 326 to provide additional support for the support shaft 334. A plurality of diverting slats 310 are mounted on the support shaft 334.
As seen most clearly in
The support shaft 334 is preferably 1144 cold-rolled steel. In the embodiment illustrated here, the support shaft 334 has an outside diameter of approximately 1⅜″.
The PLC 314 preferably includes a touch screen to control the operation of the stacking apparatus, including the operation of the diverting apparatus. As seen in
The PLC controls the diverting apparatus 306 by sending signals to a pair of relays (not illustrated). Preferably, one relay causes the actuator to extend, while another relay causes the actuator to retract. Further details of the operation and construction of the PLC are explained below.
Operation of the Exemplary Embodiment
In operation, the layboy section 300 receives corrugated blanks, such as those produced by a rotary die cut machine, and discharges the corrugated blanks onto the transfer conveyor 302. The transfer conveyor 302 receives the blanks and transports them to the main conveyor 304. The main conveyor 304 receives the blanks, transports the blanks along the length of the conveyor 304, and discharges the sheets at its discharge end 318 into the accumulator section 308. The accumulator section 308 receives the discharged blanks.
During the initial formation of a stack of sheets, the main conveyor 304 is pivoted to lower the discharge end 318 of the conveyor to a lower position. In the lower position, the conveyor has an angle θa(min) with respect to horizontal (
As additional sheets are placed on the stack, the main conveyor is pivoted to raise the discharge end vertically so that the discharged sheets are stacked one by one. As the conveyor is raised, the angle of discharge of the main conveyor changes so that there is more upward momentum on the discharged sheets, even without the diverting slats. Accordingly, the diverting slats are needed less as the main conveyor is pivoted upward. Thus, as the main conveyor is raised, the linear actuator is retracted so that the angle θb of the diverting slats is decreased with respect to the main conveyor.
The control processes are shown in more detail in
The variable DiverterPosition represents the position of the diverting slats, and is derived from the feedback sent by the actuator. Preferably, when the diverting slats are fully raised, (that is, θb=θb(max)), the value of DiverterPosition is approximately 19,400. When the diverting slats are fully retracted (i.e. θb=0), the value is approximately 450.
A variable StackerLowerLimit represents the lower limit of the stacking device in operation. Preferably, the variable StackerLowerLimit is set by entering an inch value on the PLC touchscreen. The PLC converts the inch value into a numeric value that corresponds to the StackerDeckPosition variable at that position. For example, in a typical application, the lower limit of the main conveyor is approximately 1″ above a discharge conveyor that receives discharged sheets. (This is approximately 12-18″ off of the ground.) At that height, the value of StackerDeckPosition is approximately 7,200, so the value StackerLowerLimit is set to 7,200.
A variable DivertStartingPosition is also set by a user using the touchscreen on the PLC. DivertStartingPosition represents the position of the conveyor where the diverting slats are initially activated. In other words, when the angle θa of the main conveyor is above the DivertStartingPosition, the diverting slats are fully retracted (i.e. θb=0). Below DivertStartingPosition, the diverting slats are raised by an amount that will be discussed in detail below. Preferably, DivertStartingPosition is set to correspond to an angle θa that is slightly above level. Using a 16 bit PLC, this value corresponds to approximately 21,000. Of course, this value can be set by the user to any desired number.
A variable DivertPercent is set by the user. The variable DivertPercent allows a user to choose whether the diverting slats will be used to the maximum extent possible or if the slats will be used to a lesser extent. Preferably, the Divert Percent lift value has five options that a user may choose and each option sets the variable to a different value, as shown in Table 1. As will be explained in detail below, the DivertPercent variable limits the maximum height of the diverting slats. Preferably, the value of DivertPercent is set by using the up and down arrows on the PLC touchscreen, and a bar on the PLC screen shows the DivertPercent setting. Preferably, the default setting is 100%.
A variable DiverterMax represent the maximum extension of the diverting flaps. The variable DiverterMax is user adjustable, but preferably, the variable is not readily accessible to a user (i.e. it is only accessible in maintenance mode). In the exemplary embodiment disclosed herein, when the diverting slats are fully raised, (that is, θb=θb(max)), the value of DiverterMax is approximately 19,400.
A variable DivertCorrectValue is set by a user, and a variable BitIncrement is set to 1 when the diverting slats are fully retracted. The purpose of these variables will be discussed in detail below.
Referring to
In automatic mode, the process for controlling the diverting slats differs depending on whether the main conveyor is rising or lowering.
Referring to
If in automatic mode and with the diverting slats down, the diverting slats are automatically raised until reaching a desired height. The desired height can be based upon a position analog value, a percentage height setting value, and an actuator feedback value. For example, if the diverting slats are to be raised, the operator is given a choice of five settings of <25%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% at (S2030), wherein 100% is the preset upper limit, or DiverterMax. Accordingly, at (S2040), the diverting slats are raised to the desired value.
If in automatic mode and with the diverting slats not already down, the diverting slats can be automatically lowered until reaching a desired height. The desired height can be based upon a position analog value, and an actuator feedback value. For example, if the determination is made at (S2020) to lower the diverting slats, the PLC will first determine the incremental value that the diverting slats will be lowered at (S2050). In automatic mode, the diverting slats will lower as the main conveyor rises. To achieve this, the PLC takes the upper limit, or DiverterMax, of the diverting slats and subtracts the lower limit, or StackerLowerLimit. The result is divided by a correction value, or DivertCorrectValue, and then multiplied by a variable and added to the main conveyor height to determine an incremental amount that the diverting slats are lowered at (S2060).
Thus, by using the present invention, the trajectory of the sheets discharged by a stacking apparatus is maintained at a steady angle, thereby helping to eliminate interlock jamming in the accumulator.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2642221 | Offutt et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
2660432 | Wilske et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
2901250 | Martin | Aug 1959 | A |
3142388 | Cole | Jul 1964 | A |
3321202 | Martin | May 1967 | A |
3393908 | Griffin | Jul 1968 | A |
3419266 | Martin | Dec 1968 | A |
3549144 | Lucas | Dec 1970 | A |
3593860 | Brenner | Jul 1971 | A |
3613910 | Weir | Oct 1971 | A |
3658322 | Martin | Apr 1972 | A |
3674256 | Brookhyser | Jul 1972 | A |
3704882 | Brookhyser | Dec 1972 | A |
3715043 | Weir | Feb 1973 | A |
3717263 | McWilliams | Feb 1973 | A |
3724840 | Kuckhermann | Apr 1973 | A |
3727911 | Vits | Apr 1973 | A |
3752298 | Wenger | Aug 1973 | A |
3779404 | McWilliams | Dec 1973 | A |
3791269 | Sawada | Feb 1974 | A |
3819068 | Weir | Jun 1974 | A |
3853230 | Schultz | Dec 1974 | A |
3880420 | Martin | Apr 1975 | A |
3885682 | McWilliams | May 1975 | A |
3904024 | Smith | Sep 1975 | A |
3938674 | Kroeze et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3964588 | Kornylak | Jun 1976 | A |
3992001 | Martin | Nov 1976 | A |
4084809 | Looney | Apr 1978 | A |
4099712 | Martin | Jul 1978 | A |
4169586 | Tarosky et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4268028 | Martin | May 1981 | A |
4279555 | Rydell | Jul 1981 | A |
4283185 | Woolston et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4620629 | Dean | Nov 1986 | A |
4768912 | Miura | Sep 1988 | A |
4884677 | Yu et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4958827 | Kaneko | Sep 1990 | A |
5088873 | Ruder et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5568857 | Chen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5697753 | Aurora et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6006893 | Gilmore et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6234473 | Morgan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6431346 | Gilmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471461 | Muilwyk | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6484862 | Gilmore et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6533096 | Gilmore et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6666450 | Slocum et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6814216 | Veit et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823985 | Gilmore et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6986635 | Talken et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7077615 | Thogersen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7104747 | Talken et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040094890 | Chiasson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060244205 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |