Patent Grant
10913434
This disclosure generally relates to a braking-system suitable for use on an automated vehicle, and more particularly relates to a braking-system that recognizes a slow-moving object.
It is known to automatically brake for moving-objects and stationary-objects detected proximate to a host-vehicle. Typical automatic braking systems have greater braking-distance thresholds for moving-objects compared to stationary-objects allowing greater time to stop the host-vehicle for the moving-object that may be approaching the host-vehicle. Stationary-objects typically require less time to stop the host-vehicle to prevent a collision because the host-vehicle controls the rate-of-closure to the stationary-object.
In accordance with one embodiment, a braking-system suitable for use on an automated vehicle is provided. The braking-system includes a ranging-sensor, a braking-actuator, and a controller in communication with the ranging-sensor and the braking-actuator. The ranging-sensor is used to detect a range-rate, a range, and a direction of an object proximate to a host-vehicle when the object resides in a field-of-view of the ranging-sensor. The field-of-view defines a conflict-zone and a conflict-buffer separate from the conflict-zone. The conflict-zone and the conflict-buffer correspond to a portion of the field-of-view, wherein the conflict-buffer defines a border of the conflict-zone. The braking-actuator is used to control movement of the host-vehicle. The controller determines a trail of the object based on the range and the direction. The controller further classifies the object as slow-moving when the range-rate is less than a rate-threshold and the trail is converging with the conflict-zone. The controller further determines a tangent-vector based on the trail. The controller activates the braking-actuator when the object is slow-moving, the object is detected within the conflict-buffer, and the tangent-vector intersects the conflict-zone.
In another embodiment, a method of operating a braking braking-system suitable for use on an automated vehicle is provided. The method includes the steps of detecting an object, controlling movement, determining a trail, classifying an object, determining a tangent-vector, and activating a braking-actuator. The step of detecting the object may include detecting, using a ranging-sensor, a range-rate, a range, and a direction of the object proximate to a host-vehicle when the object resides in a field-of-view of the ranging-sensor. The field-of-view defines a conflict-zone and a conflict-buffer separate from the conflict-zone. The conflict-zone and the conflict-buffer correspond to a portion of the field-of-view, wherein the conflict-buffer defines a border of the conflict-zone. The step of controlling movement may include controlling movement of the host-vehicle using a braking-actuator. The step of determining a trail may include determining, with a controller in communication with the ranging-sensor and the braking-actuator, a trail of the object based on the range and the direction. The step of classifying the object may include classifying, with the controller, the object as slow-moving when the range-rate is less than a rate-threshold and the trail is converging with the conflict-zone. The step of determining the tangent-vector may include determining, with the controller, a tangent-vector based on the trail. The step of activating the braking-actuator may include activating, with the controller, the braking-actuator when the object is slow-moving, the object is detected within the conflict-buffer, and the tangent-vector intersects the conflict-zone.
In yet another embodiment, an automated vehicular braking system is provided. The automated vehicular braking system includes a ranging-sensor, a braking-actuator, and a controller in communication with the ranging-sensor and the braking-actuator. The controller uses the ranging-sensor to detect an object proximate to a conflict-zone. The controller classifies the object as a slow-moving-object when a range-rate is less than a rate-threshold and the slow-moving-object is converging with the conflict-zone. The controller determines a vector of the slow-moving-object and activates the braking-actuator when the vector intersects the conflict-zone.
Further features and advantages will appear more clearly on a reading of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, which is given by way of non-limiting example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The ranging-sensor 14 may be a radar-sensor 28, a lidar-sensor 30, an ultrasonic-sensor (not shown), or any combination thereof. Typically, radar-systems on vehicles are capable of only determining a range 18, a range-rate 16, and azimuth-angle 32 (e.g. left/right angle) to a target 34 so may be referred to as a two-dimensional (2D) radar-system. Other radar-systems are capable of determining an elevation-angle (not shown) to the target 34 so may be referred to as a three-dimensional (3D) radar-system. In the non-limiting example illustrated in
By way of example and not limitation, the radar-sensor 28 may be configured to output a continuous or periodic data stream that includes a variety of signal characteristics associated with each target 34 detected. The signal characteristics may include or be indicative of, but are not limited to, the range 18 to the target 34 from the host-vehicle 12, the azimuth-angle 32 to the target 34 relative to a host-vehicle-longitudinal-axis (not specifically shown), an amplitude (not shown) of the radar-signal detected by the radar-sensor 28, and a relative-velocity of closure (i.e. the range-rate 16) relative to the target 34.
The field-of-view 24 defines a conflict-zone 38 and a conflict-buffer 40 separate from the conflict-zone 38. The conflict-zone 38 and the conflict-buffer 40 correspond to a portion of the field-of-view 24, wherein the conflict-buffer 40 defines a border of the conflict-zone 38, as illustrated in
The system 10 also includes a braking-actuator 42 that controls movement 44 of the host-vehicle 12. Movement 44 may be defined as forward-movement and/or rearward-movement of the host-vehicle 12. In the non-limiting examples illustrated in
The system 10 also includes the controller 36 in communication with the ranging-sensor 14 and the braking-actuator 42. The controller 36 may include a processor (not shown) such as a microprocessor or other control circuitry such as analog and/or digital control circuitry including an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for processing data as should be evident to those in the art. The controller 36 may include a memory (not specifically shown), including non-volatile memory, such as electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) for storing one or more routines, thresholds, and captured data. The one or more routines may be executed by the processor to perform steps for determining if a detected instance of the object 22 is going to be in the intended path of the host-vehicle 12 based on signals received by the controller 36 from the ranging-sensor 14 as described herein.
The controller 36 may analyze the radar-signal to categorize the data from each detected target 34 with respect to a list of previously detected targets 34 having established tracks. As used herein, a track refers to one or more data sets that have been associated with a particular one of the detected targets 34. By way of example and not limitation, if the amplitude of the radar-signal is above a predetermined amplitude threshold, then the controller 36 determines if the data corresponds to a previously detected target 34 or if a new-target has been detected. If the data corresponds to a previously detected target 34, the data is added to or combined with prior data to update the track of the previously detected target 34. If the data does not correspond to any previously detected target 34 because, for example, it is located too far away from any previously detected target 34, then it may be characterized as a new-target and assigned a unique track identification number. The identification number may be assigned according to the order that data for a new detected target 34 is received, or may be assigned an identification number according to a grid-location (not shown) in the field-of-view 24.
As illustrated in
The controller 36 may then determine a tangent-vector 52 based on the trail 46, and may activate the braking-actuator 42 when the object 22 is slow-moving 26, the object 22 is detected within the conflict-buffer 40, and the tangent-vector 52 intersects 54 the conflict-zone 38, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Step 202, DETECT-OBJECT, may include detecting, using a ranging-sensor 14, a range-rate 16, a range 18, and a direction 20 of an object 22 proximate to the host-vehicle 12 when the object 22 resides in a field-of-view 24 of the ranging-sensor 14. As will be described in more detail below, the system 10 is an improvement over prior braking systems because the system 10 is configured to classify the object 22 that is slow-moving 26 using the ranging-sensor 14. As used herein, the term ‘automated vehicle’ is not meant to suggest that fully automated or autonomous operation of the host-vehicle 12 is required. It is contemplated that the teachings presented herein are applicable to instances where the host-vehicle 12 is entirely manually operated by a human and the automation is merely providing emergency braking to the human.
The ranging-sensor 14 may be a radar-sensor 28, a lidar-sensor 30, an ultrasonic-sensor (not shown), or any combination thereof. Typically, radar-systems on vehicles are capable of only determining a range 18, a range-rate 16, and azimuth-angle 32 (e.g. left/right angle) to a target 34 so may be referred to as a two-dimensional (2D) radar-system. Other radar-systems are capable of determining an elevation-angle (not shown) to the target 34 so may be referred to as a three-dimensional (3D) radar-system. In the non-limiting example illustrated in
By way of example and not limitation, the radar-sensor 28 may be configured to output a continuous or periodic data stream that includes a variety of signal characteristics associated with each target 34 detected. The signal characteristics may include or be indicative of, but are not limited to, the range 18 to the target 34 from the host-vehicle 12, the azimuth-angle 32 to the target 34 relative to a host-vehicle-longitudinal-axis (not specifically shown), an amplitude (not shown) of the radar-signal detected by the radar-sensor 28, and a relative-velocity of closure (i.e. the range-rate 16) relative to the target 34.
The field-of-view 24 defines a conflict-zone 38 and a conflict-buffer 40 separate from the conflict-zone 38. The conflict-zone 38 and the conflict-buffer 40 correspond to a portion of the field-of-view 24, wherein the conflict-buffer 40 defines a border of the conflict-zone 38, as illustrated in
Step 204, CONTROL-MOVEMENT, may include controlling movement 44 of the host-vehicle 12 using a braking-actuator 42. Movement 44 may be defined as forward-movement and/or rearward-movement of the host-vehicle 12. In the non-limiting examples illustrated in
Step 206, DETERMINE-TRAIL, may include determining, with the controller 36 in communication with the ranging-sensor 14 and the braking-actuator 42, a trail 46 of the object 22 based on the range 18 and the direction 20. The controller 36 may include a processor (not shown) such as a microprocessor or other control circuitry such as analog and/or digital control circuitry including an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for processing data as should be evident to those in the art. The controller 36 may include a memory (not specifically shown), including non-volatile memory, such as electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) for storing one or more routines, thresholds, and captured data. The one or more routines may be executed by the processor to perform steps for determining if a detected instance of the object 22 is going to be in the intended path of the host-vehicle 12 based on signals received by the controller 36 from the ranging-sensor 14 as described herein.
The controller 36 may analyze the radar-signal to categorize the data from each detected target 34 with respect to a list of previously detected targets 34 having established tracks. As used herein, a track refers to one or more data sets that have been associated with a particular one of the detected targets 34. By way of example and not limitation, if the amplitude of the radar-signal is above a predetermined amplitude threshold, then the controller 36 determines if the data corresponds to a previously detected target 34 or if a new-target has been detected. If the data corresponds to a previously detected target 34, the data is added to or combined with prior data to update the track of the previously detected target 34. If the data does not correspond to any previously detected target 34 because, for example, it is located too far away from any previously detected target 34, then it may be characterized as a new-target and assigned a unique track identification number. The identification number may be assigned according to the order that data for a new detected target 34 is received, or may be assigned an identification number according to a grid-location (not shown) in the field-of-view 24. As illustrated in
Step 208, CLASSIFY-OBJECT, may include classifying the object 22 as slow-moving 26 when the range-rate 16 is less than a rate-threshold 48 and the trail 46 is converging 50 with the conflict-zone 38. The object 22 that is slow-moving 26 may appear to the typical radar-system as a stationary-object (not shown) when the speed is less than the rate-threshold 48. The rate-threshold 48 may be user defined and experimentation by the Inventor has discovered that the speed of the object 22 of less than 4.8 kilometer per hour (4.8 kph) is indicative of the object 22 that is slow-moving 26. The controller 36 may determine that the object 22 is converging 50 with the conflict-zone 38 based on a history of the tracks stored in the memory, where a reduction in the range 18 of the object 22 may be evident. In contrast to the slow-moving 26 object 22, the stationary-object may appear that it is moving in a line parallel to the host-vehicle 12 as the host-vehicle 12 performs the backing-maneuver, as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
Step 210, DETERMINE-TANGENT-VECTOR, may include determining a tangent-vector 52 based on the trail 46. The controller 36 may further determine the tangent-vector 52 at a point where the object 22 enters the conflict-buffer 40. As used herein, the tangent-vector 52 is tangent to the curve created by the trail 46.
Step 212, ACTIVATE-BRAKING-ACTUATOR, may include activating the braking-actuator 42 when the object 22 is slow-moving 26, the object 22 is detected within the conflict-buffer 40, and the tangent-vector 52 intersects 54 the conflict-zone 38, as illustrated in
The ranging-sensor 114 may be a radar-sensor 128, a lidar-sensor 130, an ultrasonic-sensor (not shown), or any combination thereof. Typically, radar-systems on vehicles are capable of only determining a range 118, a range-rate 116, and azimuth-angle 132 (e.g. left/right angle) to a target 134 so may be referred to as a two-dimensional (2D) radar-system. Other radar-systems are capable of determining an elevation-angle (not shown) to the target 134 so may be referred to as a three-dimensional (3D) radar-system. In the non-limiting example illustrated in
By way of example and not limitation, the radar-sensor 128 may be configured to output a continuous or periodic data stream that includes a variety of signal characteristics associated with each target 134 detected. The signal characteristics may include or be indicative of, but are not limited to, the range 118 to the target 134 from the host-vehicle 112, the azimuth-angle 132 to the target 134 relative to a host-vehicle-longitudinal-axis (not specifically shown), an amplitude (not shown) of the radar-signal detected by the radar-sensor 128, and a relative-velocity of closure (i.e. the range-rate 116) relative to the target 134.
The field-of-view 124 defines a conflict-zone 138 and a conflict-buffer 140 separate from the conflict-zone 138. The conflict-zone 138 and the conflict-buffer 140 correspond to a portion of the field-of-view 124, wherein the conflict-buffer 140 defines a border of the conflict-zone 138, as illustrated in
The system 110 also includes a braking-actuator 142 that controls movement 144 of the host-vehicle 112. Movement 144 may be defined as forward-movement and/or rearward-movement of the host-vehicle 112. In the non-limiting examples illustrated in
The system 110 also includes the controller 136 in communication with the ranging-sensor 114 and the braking-actuator 142. The controller 136 may include a processor (not shown) such as a microprocessor or other control circuitry such as analog and/or digital control circuitry including an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for processing data as should be evident to those in the art. The controller 136 may include a memory (not specifically shown), including non-volatile memory, such as electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) for storing one or more routines, thresholds, and captured data. The one or more routines may be executed by the processor to perform steps for determining if a detected instance of the object 122 is going to be in the intended path of the host-vehicle 112 based on signals received by the controller 136 from the ranging-sensor 114 as described herein.
The controller 136 may analyze the radar-signal to categorize the data from each detected target 134 with respect to a list of previously detected targets 134 having established tracks. As used herein, a track refers to one or more data sets that have been associated with a particular one of the detected targets 134. By way of example and not limitation, if the amplitude of the radar-signal is above a predetermined amplitude threshold, then the controller 136 determines if the data corresponds to a previously detected target 134 or if a new-target has been detected. If the data corresponds to a previously detected target 134, the data is added to or combined with prior data to update the track of the previously detected target 134. If the data does not correspond to any previously detected target 134 because, for example, it is located too far away from any previously detected target 134, then it may be characterized as a new-target and assigned a unique track identification number. The identification number may be assigned according to the order that data for a new detected target 134 is received, or may be assigned an identification number according to a grid-location (not shown) in the field-of-view 124.
As illustrated in
The controller 136 may then determine a vector 152 based on the trail 146, and may activate the braking-actuator 142 when the slow-moving-object 126, the object 122 is detected within the conflict-buffer 140, and the vector 152 intersects 154 the conflict-zone 138, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Accordingly, an automatic braking-system 10, a controller 36 for the automatic braking-system 10 and a method 200 of operating an automatic braking-system 10 is provided. The automatic braking-system 10 is an improvement over prior braking systems because the system 10 is configured to classify the object 22 that is slow-moving 26 using the ranging-sensor 14. In contrast, prior braking systems detect slow-moving 26 objects 22 as stationary-objects, and may not provide sufficient time to stop the host-vehicle 12 when the slow-moving 26 object 22 converges with the conflict-zone 38. While this invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiments thereof, it is not intended to be so limited, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6583403 | Koike et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6842684 | Kade | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 10279786 | Prasad | May 2019 | B2 |
| 20040061598 | King | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20070100527 | Rao et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228705 | Rao et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20090005959 | Bargman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100100268 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220189 | Yanagi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20120069182 | Sumi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120326917 | Kiehne | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130013184 | Morotomi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130028053 | Tsuji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130093583 | Shapiro | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261916 | Sekiguchi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140168415 | Ihlenburg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278059 | Gunther | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150183431 | Nanami | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150210280 | Agnew | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150232073 | Fujishiro | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150234045 | Rosenblum et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160055384 | Yoo | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160119587 | Tan et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160272172 | Lee | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170162056 | Feyerabend et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170197616 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170356994 | Wodrich et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180039283 | Srivastava | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180154871 | Prasad | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180297591 | Minemura | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1958348 | May 2007 | CN |
| 102007046007 | Nov 2008 | DE |
| 102013102367 | Oct 2013 | DE |
| 112012006790 | Apr 2015 | DE |
| 112012006878 | May 2015 | DE |
| 102016003089 | Sep 2016 | DE |
| 2525336 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| WO-9820398 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO-2014146814 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2016038773 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,980, filed Dec. 6, 2016, entitled “Automatic Braking System”. |
| “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,980, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 2 pages. |
| “Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 17202677.5, dated May 16, 2018, 8 pages. |
| “Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 18173643.0, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 6 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,980, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 9 pages. |
| “Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810550954.8, dated May 8, 2020, 21 pages. |
| “Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201711274581.8, dated Nov. 27, 2019, 11 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,980, dated Mar. 29, 2018, 8 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,980, dated Jan. 7, 2019, 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180345922 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
