Electronic mail (E-mail) applications provide users with the ability to store messages in logical folders within the interface similar to that provided by many file systems. E-mail applications also may allow users to group stored messages into logical “conversations.” Each conversation is a group of related messages including a root message and replies to the root message or to one another. When arranged by conversation, messages are displayed in a user interface of the e-mail application as a list of conversations grouped by message subject or thread. The conversations may be sorted by date, and the messages within each conversation may be sorted based on who replied to whom.
Despite the convenience offered by the conversation groups, some e-mail applications limit operations for a conversation to individual conversation items. For example, a user may not desire to engage in a conversation thread discussing lunch options with some colleagues. The user may need to delete the individual conversation items as they arrive to keep their inbox clear. Such operations may be tedious and time consuming for a user, particularly given the increasing volumes of e-mail messages a user might receive on any given day. Consequently, improvements to item management and display techniques are needed to solve these and other problems and to enhance the experience of users in various usage scenarios.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Various embodiments are generally directed to automatic conversation techniques for a message application. Some embodiments are particularly directed to automatic conversation actions that may be applied across an entire conversation group or thread for a message application, such as an e-mail application, for example.
One embodiment, for example, may comprise an apparatus such as a computing device having a message application program. The message application program may comprise, among other elements, an incoming message module operative to receive an incoming message. The message application program may also comprise a conversation identification module communicatively coupled to the incoming message module, the conversation identification module operative to determine the incoming message is part of a conversation thread, and associate the incoming message with the conversation thread by setting a conversation identifier property of the incoming message to a conversation identifier for the conversation thread. The message application program may further comprise a conversation manager module communicatively coupled to the conversation identification module, the conversation manager module operative to determine a conversation rule is associated with the conversation thread, and apply the conversation rule to the incoming message. Other embodiments are described and claimed.
These and other features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory only and are not restrictive of aspects as claimed.
Various embodiments include physical or logical structures arranged to perform certain operations, functions or services. The structures may comprise physical structures, logical structures or a combination of both. The physical or logical structures are implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or a combination of both. Descriptions of embodiments with reference to particular hardware or software elements, however, are meant as examples and not limitations. Decisions to use hardware or software elements to actually practice an embodiment depends on a number of external factors, such as desired computational rate, power levels, heat tolerances, processing cycle budget, input data rates, output data rates, memory resources, data bus speeds, and other design or performance constraints. Furthermore, the physical or logical structures may have corresponding physical or logical connections to communicate information between the structures in the form of electronic signals or messages. The connections may comprise wired and/or wireless connections as appropriate for the information or particular structure. It is worthy to note that any reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Various embodiments may be directed to automatic conversation techniques for a message application. The automatic conversation techniques may be implemented for any message application. Examples of message applications may include without limitation an e-mail message application, text message application, short message service (SMS) message application, multimedia message server (MMS) message application, voice message application, video message application, and so forth. In one embodiment, the automatic conversation techniques may be described with reference to an e-mail application by way of example and not limitation. Specific implementations may implement the automatic conversation techniques with other messaging applications, however, and still fall within the scope of the embodiments.
Various embodiments may be directed to automatic conversation techniques for a message application such as an e-mail application. In general, an e-mail application allows users to compose, send, and receive messages over electronic communication systems. In some embodiments, the described techniques may be implemented by one or more elements of a client/server e-mail messaging system. In such embodiments, the server may support a variety of messaging clients, accept requests and data from clients, process the requests, store the data, and return the processing results to the clients. Accordingly, one or more of the item aggregation and display techniques may be implemented as features within client-based e-mail applications, server-based e-mail applications including a web-based e-mail applications providing access to e-mail services via a web browser, and/or by other types of applications, programs, or services that interact with e-mail.
In some embodiments, one or more of the automatic conversation techniques can be implemented within an e-mail client application or software program such as MICROSOFT OFFICE OUTLOOK® application software from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash. In such embodiments, the described techniques may be performed by the e-mail client application in either an online or offline mode. In an offline mode, the e-mail client application may perform one or more automatic conversation techniques on locally stored or cached e-mail messages. It can be appreciated that the described techniques may be implemented by any type of e-mail client in accordance with the described embodiments including, without limitation, Messaging Application Programming Interface (MAP I) clients, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) clients, Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3) clients, Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP or IMAP4) clients, Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) clients, and so forth.
Alternatively or additionally, one or more automatic conversation techniques may be implemented as features within a server-based e-mail application or software program such as MICROSOFT EXCHANGE SERVER® from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash. The server may provide e-mail, calendaring, contacts and tasks functionality and support for mobile and web-based access to information, as well as data storage. The server may comprise or communicate with a message store for storing items including e-mail messages and other data in mailboxes and folders and may provide an interface for communicating with various e-mail clients and allowing access to the message store. The server also may comprise or communicate with a directory containing information about the users of the system and configuration information which may be used by a message transfer subsystem to perform various routing and transfer operations for e-mail messages intended for recipients on the server, another server in the same organization, and/or for recipients on the Internet or other messaging systems.
In some embodiments, the server may support various Web services including web access, mobile access, and synchronization functionality, Internet Information Services (IIS) and Internet Server Application Programming Interface (ISAPI) applications providing SMTP, NNTP, IMAP4, and POP3 services to allow Internet users to access to messaging data over a variety of Internet access protocols and HTTP-based protocols including remote procedure call (RPC) over HTTP communication. In some implementations, data may be formatted as compressed Wireless Binary XML (WbXML) data to make efficient use of bandwidth for mobile clients. In addition to standard Internet protocols, the server also may support communication over proprietary or non-standard protocols when used by a company or other organization.
The e-mail application may provide users with the ability to store messages in logical folders within the interface similar to that provided by many file systems. It can be appreciated that the term folder may refer to any collection of items however stored and/or represented in a user interface. While some operating systems or applications may not use the term folder when referring to a collection of items, such scenarios are intended to be covered by embodiments that describe and illustrate folders.
The e-mail application also may allow users and/or logic to group stored messages into logical conversations to form a conversation group or conversation thread. Each conversation may comprise a group of related messages including, for example, a root message and replies to the root message or to one another. When a user selects to arrange messages by conversation, the messages are displayed in a user interface of the email application as a list of conversations which may be grouped by message subject or thread. The conversations may be sorted by date, and the messages within each conversation may be sorted based on who replied to whom.
In some cases, the messages of a conversation may be stored across multiple folders. For example, users may manually organize messages into various folders. Users also may set one or more filtering rules for automatically separating e-mail messages into certain folders based on sender, subject, or other criteria. In addition, a reply message sent by a user may be stored within the sent items folder of the user.
Despite the convenience offered by the conversation threads, some e-mail applications limit operations for a conversation to individual conversation items. For example, a user may not desire to engage in a conversation thread discussing lunch options with some colleagues. The user may need to delete the individual conversation items as they arrive to keep their inbox clear. Such operations may be tedious and time consuming for a user, particularly given the increasing volumes of e-mail messages a user might receive on any given day.
To solve these and other problems, various embodiments may implement various automatic conversation techniques for a message application. Some embodiments are particularly directed to automatic conversation techniques that may be applied across an entire conversation group or conversation thread for a message application, such as an e-mail application, for example.
One embodiment, for example, may comprise an apparatus such as a computing device having a message application program, such as an e-mail application program. The message application program may comprise, among other elements, an incoming message module operative to receive an incoming message. The message application program may also comprise a conversation identification module communicatively coupled to the incoming message module, the conversation identification module operative to determine the incoming message is part of a conversation thread, and associate the incoming message with the conversation thread by setting a conversation identifier property of the incoming message to a conversation identifier for the conversation thread. The message application program may further comprise a conversation manager module communicatively coupled to the conversation identification module, the conversation manager module operative to determine a conversation rule is associated with the conversation thread, and apply the conversation rule to the incoming message. In this manner, a user needs to establish a conversation rule once, and the conversation rule is automatically applied to all the stored messages in a conversation thread, as well as new incoming messages that are part of the same conversation thread. As a result, a user may have an enhanced messaging experience.
More particularly, the conversation manager module implements automatic conversation techniques in the form of conversation level actions that may be applied across an entire conversation group or conversation thread. Conversation level actions typically affect some or all messages in the entire conversation thread. By way of contrast, item level actions typically affect a single message item. Examples of conversation rules may include without limitation an “always delete” conversation rule, an “always move” conversation rule, an “always categorize” conversation, among others. These are merely a few examples, and any number of conversation level actions may be implemented for a conversation thread as desired for a given implementation. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
As used herein the terms “system,” “subsystem,” “component,” and “module” are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, comprising either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component can be implemented as a process running on a processor, a processor, a hard disk drive, multiple storage drives (of optical and/or magnetic storage medium), an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components can reside within a process and/or thread of execution, and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers as desired for a given implementation. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The computing devices 110, 130 may be communicatively coupled via a network 118 and appropriate wireless or wired communications media. The computing devices 110, 130 may coordinate operations between each other. The coordination may involve the uni-directional or bi-directional exchange of information. For instance, the computing devices 110, 130 may communicate information over the network 118. The network 118 may comprise a packet-switched network, a circuit-switched network, or a combination of both. The information can be implemented as data messages sent across various network interfaces. Exemplary network interfaces include parallel interfaces, serial interfaces, and bus interfaces.
The computing devices 110, 130 may implement respective computing systems 120, 120a. The computing systems 120, 120a may include various computing elements, such as one or more processors, co-processors, memory units, chipsets, controllers, peripherals, interfaces, oscillators, timing devices, video cards, audio cards, multimedia input/output (I/O) components, and so forth. The computing systems 120, 120a may implement, among other elements, respective client application programs 122 and server application programs 132. In the example illustrated in
The applications 126 may comprise one or more types of application programs supporting operation of the client computing device 110. Exemplary application programs may include, without limitation, a web browser application, telephone application (e.g., cellular, VoIP, PTT), networking application, messaging application (e.g., 1M, SMS, MMS), calendar application, contacts application, tasks application, word processing application, spreadsheet application, database application, media application (e.g., video player, audio player, multimedia player, digital camera, video camera, media management), location based services (LBS) application, gaming application, and so forth.
The applications 136 may comprise one or more types of application programs supporting operation of the server computing device 130. In various implementations, the applications 136 may include server application programs supporting operation of the server computing device 130 as an e-mail server, a web server, and/or file server in accordance with the described embodiments. In some cases, one or more of the applications 136 may comprise a network, server or web-based version of one or more of the applications 126. In such cases, the applications 126, 136 may operate separately, such as when the client computing device 110 is offline, or may interoperate when the client computing device 110 is online and connected to the server computing device 130 via the network 118.
The computing systems 120, 120a also may comprise respective operating systems 128, 138 suitable for controlling the operation of the client computing device 110 and the server computing device 130. In some embodiments, the operating systems 128, 138 may comprise respective client and server versions of an operating system such as a MICROSOFT WINDOWS® operating system from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash. It can be appreciated that other suitable operating systems may be used for the client computing device 110 and/or the server computing device 130.
The computing devices 110, 130 may comprise or communicate with a data store for item storage such as e-mail messages and other data in mailboxes and folders. With reference to
In addition to respective computing systems 120, 120a, the computing devices 110, 130 may implement respective communications system 150, 150a. The communications systems 150, 150a may include various communications elements, such as a transmitter, receiver, transceiver, radio, network interface, baseband processor, antenna, amplifiers, filters, and so forth. In one embodiment, for example, the computing devices 110, 130 may be implemented using a computing and communications architecture as described with reference to
The computing device 200 further includes a mass storage device 214 for storing an operating system, such as the operating system 128, as well as other program modules 216 and program data 218. The mass storage device 214 also may store various application programs, as described in greater detail below.
The mass storage device 214 is connected to the processor 204 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the system bus 212. The mass storage device 214, and its associated computer-readable media, provides non-volatile storage for the computing device 200. Although the description of computer-readable media contained herein refers to a mass storage device, such as a hard disk or CD-ROM drive, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the computing device 200. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
According to various embodiments, the computing device 200 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a network 118 which, in some implementations, may be a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and Internet Protocol (IP) network, such as the Internet. The computing device 200 may connect to the network 118 through a network interface 220 (e.g., a wired or wireless network interface) connected to the system bus 212. It can be appreciated that the network 118 may comprise any type of network in accordance with the described embodiments including, without limitation, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), and/or a cellular telephone network and that the network interface 220 may support various transport layers such as GPRS, CDMA 1×RTT, IEEE 802.11, and others for connecting to a variety of networks and/or remote computer systems.
The computing device 200 may include an I/O controller 222 for receiving and processing input from a number of input devices 224. A user may enter commands and information into the computing device 200 through various input devices 224 such as a keyboard and pointing device, such as a mouse, trackball or touch pad. Other examples of input devices 224 may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. The input devices 224 may be connected to the processor 204 through the I/O controller 222 that is coupled to the system bus 212, but may be connected by other interfaces and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus (USB). The I/O controller 222 also may provide output to various output devices 224, such as a monitor or other type of display device that is connected via the I/O controller 222 to the system bus 212. In various implementations, the display device may present one or more user interfaces (UIs) to a user in accordance with the described embodiments. In addition to a display device, the I/O controller 222 may provide output to a printer, speakers, and other peripheral devices.
As mentioned above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the mass storage device 214 and RAM 208 of the computing device 200. In the example illustrated in
According to various embodiments, the e-mail client application 124 and/or the e-mail server application 134 may implement one or more automatic conversation techniques. In one embodiment, for example, the e-mail client application 124 and/or the e-mail server application 134 may be implemented as described with reference to
As shown, the e-mail application 300 may include item storage 310. While the item storage 310 is shown as part of the e-mail application 300 for purposes of illustration, and not limitation, it can be appreciated that the item storage 310 can reside in various locations in accordance with the described embodiments. For instance, the item storage 310 may reside on the client computing device 110, the server computing device 130, and/or the database 140. As one non-limiting example, the item storage 310 of the e-mail application 300 can reside within the program data 218 of the computing device 200, either in a database and/or in one or more files. As another non-limiting example, the item storage 310 can reside all or in part in a directory specified by the user in the file system of an operating system such as operating system 128 or operating system 138. As another non-limiting example, the item storage 310 can reside all or in part on the database 140 which may be accessed or hosted by the server computing device 130.
In the example illustrated in
The e-mail application 300 may provide the user with the ability to store items in certain logical folders such as the inbox folder 312, the junk folder 314, the sent items folder 316, and one or more other e-mail folders 318 such as a user-created folder for storing items associated with a certain sender or recipient, subject (e.g., project), content (e.g., text, attachment), or other criteria. The user may interface with the e-mail application 300 and manually organize items into various folders. The user also may set one or more filtering rules for automatically separating items into certain folders based on sender, recipient, subject, content, or other criteria. In addition, replies message sent by the user in response to other messages may be stored within the sent items folder 316. The users also may store older items in one or more archive files 320 which may be implemented as one or more Personal Storage Table extension (.pst) files on the local hard drive of the user and/or any other suitable archiving data structure.
The e-mail application 300 may allow the user to group stored messages into logical conversations. Each conversation may comprise a group of related items including, for example, a root message and replies to the root message or to one another. In some cases, the related items of a conversation may be stored across multiple storage locations such as across two or more of the inbox folder 312, junk folder 314, sent items folder 316, other e-mail folders 318, and archive files 320.
As shown, the e-mail application 300 may include item management logic 330 which may be responsible for carrying out some or all of the item aggregation and display techniques described herein. In the example illustrated in
The item management logic 330 also may comprise other logic for operating the e-mail application 300 which may support various other operations and capabilities. Exemplary operations and capabilities may include sending and receiving operations, storing and organizing operations, filtering operations, sorting operations, searching operations, previewing operations, capabilities for synchronization, capabilities for accessing messaging data including web access and mobile access, capabilities for detecting the online/offline state of users, capabilities for integrating the e-mail application 300 with calendar, contacts and tasks functionality, and/or any other features in accordance with the described embodiments.
In some implementations, the item management logic 330 may reside within the e-mail application 300 as part of the client application programs 122 on the client computing device 110 or as part of the server application programs 132 on the server computing device 130. It can be appreciated, however, that the item management logic 330 can alternatively or additionally be embodied as computer-executable instructions stored on one or more types of computer-readable storage media in a variety of locations in accordance with the described embodiments.
Although the example illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
When executed by processor 204, incoming message module 332 interacts with operating system 128 to receive incoming e-mail messages that are received from network 118 by network interface 220. For instance, incoming message module 332 may use an interface provided by operating system 128 to configure a callback that causes operating system 128 to provide incoming e-mail messages to incoming message module 332. When incoming message module 332 receives an incoming e-mail message, incoming message module 332 may perform one or more e-mail processing operations on the incoming e-mail message. For instance, incoming message module 332 may determine whether the incoming e-mail address includes a “to” property, a “cc” property, or a “bcc” property that specifies an e-mail address associated with an active account maintained by the computing devices 110, 130. In this example, incoming message module 332 may generate an outgoing “bounce” message when the “to” property, the “cc” property, or the “bcc” property of the incoming e-mail message specifies an e-mail address associated with an inactive account that was previously maintained by the computing devices 110, 130. After incoming message module 332 performs the e-mail processing operations on the incoming e-mail message, incoming message module 332 may provide the incoming e-mail message to conversation identification module 334.
The item management logic 330 may include the conversation identification module 334 communicatively coupled to the incoming message module 332. The conversation identification module 334 is operative to determine the incoming message is part of a conversation thread. The conversation identification module 334 associates the incoming message with the conversation thread by setting a conversation identifier property of the incoming message to a conversation identifier for the conversation thread.
When executed by processor 204, conversation identification module 334 receives incoming e-mail messages from incoming message module 332 and attempts to identify an existing conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message. If conversation identification module 334 cannot successfully identify an existing conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message, conversation identification module 334 may associate the incoming e-mail message with a new conversation.
The conversation identification module 334 may determine whether a message is part of an existing conversation in a number of different ways. In one embodiment, for example, the conversation identification module 334 executes an algorithm that associates the incoming e-mail message with an existing conversation when one or more of the following conditions occur:
The occurrence of one of these conditions may represent an exemplary set of preconditions for allowing the conversation identification module 334 to associate the incoming e-mail message with an existing conversation. There may be implementations, however, in which additional conditions could occur before the conversation identification module 334 associates the incoming e-mail message with an existing conversation. For instance, one implementation may associate a received message with an existing conversation when condition (2) occurs only if condition (1) does not occur.
Additionally or alternatively, the conversation identification module 334 does not act to associate e-mail messages with conversations. Rather, the conversation identification module 334 may perform actions to associate e-mail messages with conversations. This includes both incoming e-mail messages and outgoing e-mail messages.
After conversation identification module 334 associates the incoming e-mail message with an existing conversation or associates the incoming e-mail message with a new conversation, conversation identification module 334 may store in a message database 350 the incoming e-mail message along with a conversation identifier that identifies the conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message. In one implementation, message database 350 includes a table that includes a row for each email message and a column for each property of an e-mail message. For instance, the table may include a column for a “to” property of an e-mail message, a “from” property of the e-mail message, a “cc” property of the e-mail message, a “date” property of the email message, a “subject” property of the e-mail message, a “body” property of the email message, and so on. Furthermore, in this instance, the table may include a column for a conversation identifier that identifies the conversation associated with the e-mail message. An example is provided in Table 1 as follows:
It should be appreciated that the table may include columns for many other properties of e-mail messages. These other properties may include an “X-MimeOLE” property, a “Content-class” property, a “MIME-Version” property, a “Content-Type” property, a “Content-Transfer-Encoding” property, a “Date” property, a “Message-ID” property, an “X-MS-Has-Attach” property, a “X-MS-TNEF-Correlator” property, an “X-Priority” property, a “Priority” property, an “Importance” property, a “cc” property, a “bcc” property, and so on. Furthermore, it can easily been seen that Table 1 includes a series of e-mail messages exchanged between a person associated with the e-mail address “ybara@microsoft.com” and a person associated with the e-mail address “bamey@microsoft.com” regarding whether to get lunch. It should be noted that these e-mail messages have the same conversation identifier listed in their “conversation identifier” properties. In this way, the conversation identifiers of the “conversation identifier” properties of these e-mail messages indicate that these e-mail messages are associated with a common conversation.
The item management logic 330 may include the message retrieval module 338 communicatively coupled to the conversation manager module 336. When executed by processor 204, message retrieval module 338 enables users to retrieve e-mail messages stored in message database 350. When the e-mail application 300 is implemented by the server computing device 130, for example, message retrieval module 338 may receive periodic requests from the e-mail client application 124 on the client computing device 110 to retrieve new messages that specify an e-mail address associated with a user of the client computing device 110. In response to such requests, message retrieval module 338 may identify any new e-mail messages in message database 350 that have not previously been sent to the client computing device 110. If message retrieval module 338 identifies any such new e-mail messages, message retrieval module 338 may send the identified e-mail messages, along with the conversation identifiers of the e-mail messages, to the client computing device 110. Upon receiving the identified e-mail messages, the e-mail client application on client computing device 110 may present a user interface view in which the identified e-mail messages, along with previously retrieved e-mail messages, are grouped by conversation with which the e-mail messages are associated. For instance, client computing device 110 may present a user interface view in which e-mail messages that are associated with a conversation are presented as trees of e-mail messages. In another instance, client computing device 110 may present an interface that includes separate lists of e-mail messages for each conversation.
The item management logic 330 may include the outgoing message module 340 communicatively coupled to the message retrieval module 338. When executed by processor 204, outgoing message module 340 enables users to send outgoing e-mail messages. For example, outgoing message module 340 may receive a request from the e-mail client application 124 on the client computing device 110 to send an outgoing e-mail message. In this example, outgoing message module 340 may associate the outgoing e-mail message with a conversation identifier and incorporate this conversation identifier into the outgoing e-mail message. After outgoing message module 340 associates the outgoing e-mail message with the conversation identifier and incorporates this conversation identifier into the outgoing e-mail message as a “conversation identifier” property of the e-mail message, outgoing message module 340 may instruct operating system 128 to send the outgoing e-mail message on network 118.
The item management logic 330 may include the conversation manager module 336 communicatively coupled to the conversation identification module 334. The conversation manager module 336 may be generally arranged to implement various automatic conversation techniques. The conversation manager module 336 implements automatic conversation techniques in the form of conversation level actions that may be applied across an entire conversation group or conversation thread managed by the e-mail application 300. Conversation level actions typically affect some or all messages in the entire conversation thread. By way of contrast, item level actions typically affect a single message item.
One of the main tenets of helping users reduce information overload with the conversation functionality is giving them an easy way to act on a conversation model. The conversation model now intelligently represents the group of messages with which the user is interacting. There are two main groups of actions that the new conversation model will support. First, the conversation model promotes what were previously item-level only actions to the conversation level, and the introduction of a new set of actions specifically for conversation items. The promotion of item-level actions is about batching together actions that used to be performed individually on messages, such as “Flag,” “Categorize,” “Assign,” and so forth, so that the user needs to set a single conversation rule for an entire conversation. For example, the user can flag a conversation thread and use that to easily flag the latest message in the conversation thread. Furthermore, having conversation-level views allows the e-mail application 300 to introduce the second category of actions, particularly those that act specifically on the conversation thread itself. These are a set of operations that leverage the semantic of a “conversation,” such as always delete or always move conversation rules.
The conversation manager module 336 is operative to create a conversation rule for a conversation thread. An operator or user may create a conversation rule for a conversation thread by selecting one or more messages from a conversation thread, and assigning a conversation rule to the one or more messages. The conversation rule defines a set of conversation level actions to perform on existing and future messages having a common conversation identifier (ID) property for a conversation thread. The existing messages may be stored in the message database 350. The future messages may include new incoming messages to the e-mail application 300 received from a remote device across the network 118 and the network interface 220. Some examples of conversation rules include without limitation an “always delete” conversation rule, an “always move” conversation rule, an “always categorize” conversation, among others. Each of these conversation rules are described further below.
Once the conversation manager module 336 creates a conversation rule for a conversation thread, the conversation manager module 336 stores the conversation rule in a conversation action table (CAT). The CAT is a new table designed to store the information needed to drive conversation level actions. The CAT is where a conversation “object” has an ongoing action associated with it. It is a table in the PST that contains an entry for each conversation which has an ongoing action or set of actions. The basic structure of the CAT is shown in Table 2 as follows:
As shown in Table 2, the CAT may contain a conversation identifier, a parameter (Yes or No) to indicate whether a conversation rule is applied to the conversation identifier, and information needed to implement a given rule, such as a target folder for the always move conversation rule, or a category name for the always category conversation rule. The CAT also provides an expiration date and time to indicate when a given conversation rule is to remain in force. Whenever a new incoming message arrives at the incoming message module 332, and the conversation identification module 334 identifies the incoming message as part of a conversation thread, the conversation manager module 336 consults the CAT the performs subsequent message handling operations on the incoming message in accordance with the various conversation rules associated with the conversation thread.
The conversation manager module 336 is operative to create an always delete conversation rule to automatically route the incoming message to a deleted items folder. The always delete conversation rule is a power-user feature that allows a user to automatically move new items that arrive in a conversation to a Deleted Items folder thereby eliminating the incoming message from an Inbox folder. A user may create an always delete conversation rule by selecting a user interface element, such as a user interface button on a user interface ribbon.
When a user selects a single conversation item, such as a message for a conversation, to bring the single conversation item in focus, and selects the user interface button for “Always Delete,” the conversation manager module 336 initiates operations to create the always delete conversation rule. The conversation manager module 336 first determines if the conversation already has a pre-existing always delete conversation rule in place. This may be accomplished by checking a property on the conversation item to determine if a parent conversation item has the ongoing action associated with it. This property is set for the message when the CAT processing occurs. The conversation manager module 336 generates a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 3:
When the user clicks [OK], all of the individual messages in the current folder for the conversation are moved to the Deleted Items folder. An entry is created in the CAT for this conversation using its PR_CONVERSATION_ID if one does not exist already. New conversation items that arrive to this conversation and match the PR_CONVERSATION_ID will automatically be moved to the Deleted Items folder. This logic is subject to the expiration guidelines set in the CAT.
When multiple conversation items have focus, and a user selects the user interface button for “Always Delete,” the conversation manager module 336 initiates operations to create the always delete conversation rule. The conversation manager module 336 first determines whether the current folder for the selected conversation items is the Deleted Items folder. If not, the conversation manager module 336 generates a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 4:
When the user clicks [OK], all of the individual messages in the current folder for the selected conversations are moved to the Deleted Items folder. An entry is created in the CAT for each of the conversations using the PR_CONVERSATION_ID. New items that arrive to these conversations and match the PR_CONVERSATION_ID will automatically be moved to the Deleted Items folder. This logic is subject to the expiration guidelines set in the CAT.
A user can disable the “Always Delete” ongoing action on a conversation in a number of different ways. To disable an always delete conversation rule for a conversation, the user may go to the Deleted Items folder.
When a single conversation item has focus and is currently subject to the always delete conversation rule, and the current folder is the Deleted Items folder, then a ribbon user interface will display a “Disable Always Delete” user interface button to remove the always delete conversation rule from the conversation thread. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 5:
When a user selects [OK], all of the individual messages in the conversation thread are moved to the Inbox folder. The conversation manager module 336 removes the corresponding entry for the always delete conversation rule from the CAT.
When multiple conversation items are in focus and are currently subject to the always delete conversation rule, and the current folder is the Deleted Items folder, then a ribbon user interface will display a “Disable Always Delete” user interface button to remove the always delete conversation rule from the conversation thread. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 6:
When the user selects [OK], all of the individual messages in the selected conversations are moved to the Inbox folder. The conversation manager module 336 removes the corresponding entries for the always delete conversation rules from the CAT.
It is worthy to note that the conversation manager module 336 does not check the enabled/disabled state of every conversation when in a multi-select state since this could affect performance of the e-mail application 300, such as causing a slow-down in view rendering. To improve performance, the conversation manager module 336 does not check each conversation, but rather will default to assuming all of them have the ongoing action associated with it. Alternatively, the conversation manager module 336 could check the enabled/disabled state of every conversation when in a multi-select state for a given implementation when performance is not an issue.
The conversation manager module 336 is operative to create an always move conversation rule to automatically route the incoming message to a target items folder. The always move conversation rule is another power-user feature that enables the user to easily move items in a specific conversation to a folder of their choosing. It is much lighter-weight than creating a regular rule and is accessed off of the “Move To Folder” ribbon button.
When a single conversation item has focus, and a target folder is chosen, a ribbon user interface will display a “Always Move” user interface button to initiate operations for generating an always move conversation rule to move messages to the target folder. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 7:
When the user clicks [OK], all of the individual messages in the current folder for the conversation are moved to the chosen folder. The conversation manager module 336 creates a new entry in the CAT for this conversation using its PR_CONVERSATION_ID if one does not exist already. The conversation manager module 336 evaluates and automatically moves new conversation items with a matching PR_CONVERSATION_ID to the target folder. This logic is subject to the expiration guidelines set in the CAT.
When multiple conversation items have focus, and a target folder is chosen, a ribbon user interface will display a “Always Move” user interface button to initiate operations for generating an always move conversation rule to move messages for multiple conversations to the target folder. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 8:
When the user clicks [OK], all of the individual messages in the current folder for the selected conversations are moved to the chosen folder. The conversation manager module 336 creates an entry in the CAT for these conversations using their PR_CONVERSATION_ID if one does not exist already. If the PR_CONVERSATION_ID already has an always move conversation rule associated with it, this overwrites that rule. It will also reset the expiration time to a default time. New items that arrive to this conversation and match the PR_CONVERSATION_ID will automatically be moved to the selected folder. This logic is subject to the expiration guidelines set in the CAT.
There are a few exception cases for an always move conversation rule. For example, if a user chooses Deleted Items as the destination folder for the always move conversation rule, it is essentially the same as an always delete conversation rule. When the conversation is selected in the Deleted Items folder, the “Always Delete” button will toggle to its “deactivate” state.
A user can disable an always move conversation rule in a number of different ways. For example, when a single conversation item has focus, the conversation manager module 336 may determine whether the conversation item is currently subject to a pre-existing always move conversation rule. This may be accomplished by checking a property on the conversation item to determine if a parent conversation item has the ongoing action associated with it. This property is set for the message when the CAT processing occurs. A ribbon user interface will display a “Disable Always Move” user interface button to remove the always move conversation rule from the conversation thread. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 9:
When the user clicks [OK], the conversation manager module 336 stops the ongoing always move action. The conversation manager module 336 removes the entry for the conversation thread from the CAT. The conversation items may optionally be moved or not moved from their current location based on a given implementation.
When multiple conversation items have focus, a ribbon user interface will display a “Disable Always Move” user interface button to remove the always move conversation rule from the conversation threads. Selecting the user interface button causes the conversation manager module 336 to generate a user interface view such as a dialog box having the following properties as shown in Table 10:
When the user clicks [OK], the conversation manager module 336 stops the ongoing always move action for all conversations that have the action associated with them. The conversation manager module 336 removes the entries for the conversation threads from the CAT. The conversation items may optionally be moved or not moved from their current location based on a given implementation.
The conversation manager module 336 is operative to create an always categorize conversation rule to automatically assign a category for the incoming message. Assigning a category to a conversation item automatically enables ongoing categorization for the entire conversation thread.
When assigning a category using an appropriate “Always Categorize” user interface button from the ribbon user interface on a single conversation item, the selected categories are applied to all of the items in all folders for that conversation. This is an ongoing action, and a CAT entry is automatically created. This is additive to other categories that may exist for any individual messages. For example, assume a conversation thread has messages 1, 2, 3 and 4, where message 1 has a category A, message 3 has a category B, and all messages 1-4 are in an Inbox folder. If a user selects the conversation thread and applies the “Always Categorize” action with the category C, the results are additive as follows:
Whenever a new incoming message arrives at the incoming message module 332, and the conversation identification module 334 identifies the incoming message as part of a conversation thread, the conversation manager module 336 determines whether a conversation rule is associated with the conversation thread, and if so, applies the conversation rule to the incoming message. The conversation manager module 336 consults the CAT and performs subsequent message handling operations on the incoming message in accordance with the various conversation rules associated with the conversation thread.
By way of example, assume a user named Michael likes to stay on top of a lot of mail during the course of the day. He has rules that move distribution list mail to different folders, but still works hard to keep track of the regular mail he receives in his Inbox. One of his colleagues starts up an e-mail thread to his team distribution list, which Michael receives in his Inbox, about the upcoming college basketball playoffs. Michael is not interested in participating in this year's pool and would like to remove the thread from his Inbox. He choose the “Always Delete” action and the entire thread is moved to his Deleted Items folder. As his colleagues continue to talk on the thread, all subsequent replies are silently placed right in Michael's Deleted Items, keeping his inbox clear of the noise of that conversation while not forcing him to make a one-off rule or remove himself from that (usually) important alias.
In another example, assume a user named Paul is a filer and constantly moves mail to different folders based on the project or person that sent it. As new conversations arrive in his inbox, Paul can easily act on just the messages that have arrived in that folder and move them to wherever he'd like. A specific conversation about the “Morandi” project pops up and continues to be active, so Paul uses the “Always Move” action to easily have new items in that conversation go the “Morandi Project” folder when they arrive.
In yet another example, assume a user named Mary categorizes new messages as they arrive. As subsequent replies arrive for a conversation, Mary needs to manually categorize each item individually each time a new one arrives. Mary uses the “Always Categorize” action to recognize that new items have arrived in the conversation and automatically apply the correct categories from the first message to the rest of the conversation.
In addition to applying conversation rules for incoming messages, the conversation manager module 336 also applies conversation rules to stored messages. The message database 350 stores a plurality of messages for each conversation thread. When the conversation manager module 336 creates a new conversation rule for the conversation thread, the conversation manager module 336 applies the conversation rule to the plurality of stored messages for the appropriate conversation thread.
Operations for the above-described embodiments may be further described with reference to one or more logic flows. It may be appreciated that the representative logic flows do not necessarily have to be executed in the order presented, or in any particular order, unless otherwise indicated. Moreover, various activities described with respect to the logic flows can be executed in serial or parallel fashion. The logic flows may be implemented using one or more hardware elements and/or software elements of the described embodiments or alternative elements as desired for a given set of design and performance constraints. For example, the logic flows may be implemented as logic (e.g., computer program instructions) for execution by a logic device (e.g., a general purpose or specific-purpose computer).
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The logic flow 900 may determine the incoming message is part of a conversation thread at block 904. For example, conversation identification module 334 receives incoming e-mail messages from incoming message module 332 and attempts to identify an existing conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message. If conversation identification module 334 cannot successfully identify an existing conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message, conversation identification module 334 may associate the incoming e-mail message with a new conversation. The conversation identification module 334 may utilize any number of different algorithms and conditions to explicitly or implicitly determine whether a message is part of a conversation thread. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
The logic flow 900 may associate the incoming message with the conversation thread at block 906. For example, if the incoming message module 332 identifies the incoming message as part of an existing conversation thread, the conversation identification module 334 associates the incoming message with the conversation thread by assigning the incoming message a common conversation identifier in the appropriate property for the incoming message. If the incoming message module 332 does not identify the incoming message as part of an existing conversation thread, however, the conversation identification module 334 associate the incoming e-mail message with a new conversation by assigning it a new conversation identifier. After conversation identification module 334 associates the incoming e-mail message with an existing conversation or associates the incoming e-mail message with a new conversation, conversation identification module 334 may store in a message database 350 the incoming e-mail message along with a conversation identifier that identifies the conversation associated with the incoming e-mail message.
The logic flow 900 may determine a conversation rule is associated with the conversation thread at block 908. For example, the conversation manager module 336 searches a CAT to determine whether a conversation rule is associated with the conversation thread. The conversation manager module 336 may search the CAT using any number of different search criteria, such as the conversation identifier, for example.
The logic flow 900 may apply the conversation rule to the incoming message at block 910. For example, when the conversation manager module 336 locates a conversation rule associated with the conversation thread, the conversation manager module 336 applies the located conversation rule to the incoming message. The conversation manager module 336 performs certain message processing operations on the incoming message as defined by the conversation rule, such as deleting the incoming message, moving the incoming message, categorizing the incoming message, forwarding the incoming message to another e-mail application 300 for another user, replying to the incoming message, copying the incoming message, or any other message processing operations made available by a given e-mail application 300. The conversation manager module 336 may also use an incoming message and corresponding conversation rule to actuate or trigger subsequent operations for other messages stored by the message database 350 or application programs executing on the computing devices 110, 130.
In one embodiment, for example, the article of manufacture 1000 and/or the computer-readable storage medium 1002 may store logic 1004 comprising executable computer program instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform methods and/or operations in accordance with the described embodiments. The executable computer program instructions may include any suitable type of code, such as source code, compiled code, interpreted code, executable code, static code, dynamic code, and the like. The executable computer program instructions may be implemented according to a predefined computer language, manner or syntax, for instructing a computer to perform a certain function. The instructions may be implemented using any suitable high-level, low-level, object-oriented, visual, compiled and/or interpreted programming language, such as C, C++, Java, BASIC, Perl, Matlab, Pascal, Visual BASIC, assembly language, and others.
Various embodiments may be implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or a combination of both. Examples of hardware elements may include any of the examples as previously provided for a logic device, and further including microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, logic gates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets, and so forth. Examples of software elements may include software components, programs, applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs, machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware, software modules, routines, subroutines, functions, methods, procedures, software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instruction sets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer code segments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof. Determining whether an embodiment is implemented using hardware elements and/or software elements may vary in accordance with any number of factors, such as desired computational rate, power levels, heat tolerances, processing cycle budget, input data rates, output data rates, memory resources, data bus speeds and other design or performance constraints, as desired for a given implementation.
Some embodiments may be described using the expression “coupled” and “connected” along with their derivatives. These terms are not necessarily intended as synonyms for each other. For example, some embodiments may be described using the terms “connected” and/or “coupled” to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. The term “coupled,” however, may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still cooperate or interact with each other.
It is emphasized that the Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b), requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein,” respectively. Moreover, the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” and so forth, are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This patent application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/144,642, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,402,096, filed Jun. 24, 2008 and entitled “Automatic Conversation Techniques,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4823283 | Diehm et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5155806 | Hoeber et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5220675 | Padawer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5243697 | Hoeber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247438 | Subas et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5305435 | Bronson | Apr 1994 | A |
5307086 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5323314 | Baber et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5377354 | Scannell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5412772 | Monson | May 1995 | A |
5457476 | Jenson | Oct 1995 | A |
5461708 | Kahn | Oct 1995 | A |
5500936 | Allen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502805 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5519606 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5559875 | Bieselin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559944 | Ono | Sep 1996 | A |
5570109 | Jenson | Oct 1996 | A |
5581677 | Myers et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588107 | Bowden et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592602 | Edmunds | Jan 1997 | A |
5596694 | Capps | Jan 1997 | A |
5625783 | Ezekiel et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634100 | Capps | May 1997 | A |
5634128 | Messina | May 1997 | A |
5638504 | Scott et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644737 | Tuniman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659693 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664208 | Pavley et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673403 | Brown et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694610 | Habib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721847 | Johnson | Feb 1998 | A |
5734915 | Roewer | Mar 1998 | A |
5751373 | Ohyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760768 | Gram | Jun 1998 | A |
5760773 | Berman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761646 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764960 | Perks et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778402 | Gipson | Jul 1998 | A |
5778404 | Capps et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787295 | Nakao | Jul 1998 | A |
5793365 | Tang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | MacNaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805167 | Van Cruyningen | Sep 1998 | A |
5812132 | Goldstein | Sep 1998 | A |
5821936 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828376 | Solimene et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838321 | Wolf | Nov 1998 | A |
5842009 | Borovoy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844558 | Kumar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844572 | Schott | Dec 1998 | A |
5844588 | Anderson | Dec 1998 | A |
5855006 | Huemoeller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864848 | Horvitz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873108 | Goyal et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874953 | Webster et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885006 | Sheedy | Mar 1999 | A |
5893073 | Kasso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893125 | Shostak | Apr 1999 | A |
5898436 | Stewart et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899979 | Miller et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905863 | Knowles et al. | May 1999 | A |
5917489 | Thurlow et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924089 | Mocek et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926806 | Marshall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936625 | Kahl et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937160 | Davis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940078 | Nagarajayya et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940847 | Fein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943051 | Onda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960406 | Rasansky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963938 | Wilson | Oct 1999 | A |
5970466 | Detjen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999173 | Ubillos | Dec 1999 | A |
5999938 | Bliss et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008806 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012075 | Fein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016478 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018343 | Wang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034683 | Mansour et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038395 | Chow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038542 | Ruckdashel | Mar 2000 | A |
6043816 | Williams et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067087 | Krauss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067551 | Brown et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072492 | Schagen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073110 | Rhodes et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073142 | Geiger et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085206 | Domini et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088707 | Bates et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092103 | Pritsch | Jul 2000 | A |
6101480 | Conmy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6133915 | Arcuri et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137488 | Kraft | Oct 2000 | A |
6154755 | Dellert et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175363 | Williams et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188403 | Sacerdoti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189024 | Bauersfeld et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192381 | Stiegemeier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195094 | Celebiler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199102 | Cobb | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211879 | Soohoo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216122 | Elson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219670 | Mocek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222540 | Sacerdoti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232971 | Haynes | May 2001 | B1 |
6236396 | Jenson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237135 | Timbol | May 2001 | B1 |
6239798 | Ludolph et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256628 | Dobson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269341 | Redcay, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272488 | Chang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278450 | Arcuri et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289317 | Peterson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307544 | Harding | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307574 | Ashe | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311195 | Hachiya et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313854 | Gibson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323883 | Minoura et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326962 | Szabo | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327046 | Miyamoto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330589 | Kennedy | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341277 | Coden et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342901 | Adler et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353451 | Teibel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356893 | Itakura et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359634 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369840 | Barnett et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373507 | Camara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374304 | Chiashi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384849 | Morcos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385769 | Lewallen | May 2002 | B1 |
6405216 | Minnaert et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424829 | Kraft | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429882 | Abdelnur et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430563 | Fritz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433801 | Moon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433831 | Dinwiddie et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434598 | Gish | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442527 | Worthington | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446118 | Gottlieb | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456304 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457062 | Pivowar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459441 | Perroux et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466236 | Pivowar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466240 | Maslov | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469722 | Kinoe et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469723 | Gould | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480865 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484180 | Lyons et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493006 | Gourdol et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493007 | Pang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493731 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507845 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529918 | Takahashi | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6546417 | Baker | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567509 | Gusler et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570596 | Frederiksen | May 2003 | B2 |
6578192 | Boehme et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583798 | Hoek et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584501 | Cartsonis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603493 | Lovell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618732 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621504 | Nadas et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621508 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633867 | Kraft et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635089 | Burkett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654791 | Bates et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664983 | Ludolph | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680749 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686938 | Jobs et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691281 | Sorge et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701513 | Bailey | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707454 | Barg | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708205 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721402 | Usami | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727919 | Reder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732330 | Claussen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734880 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750850 | O'Leary | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750890 | Sugimoto | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785868 | Raff | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789107 | Bates et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799095 | Owen et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816904 | Ludwig et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825859 | Severenuk et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826729 | Giesen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832244 | Raghunandan | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847989 | Chastain et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850255 | Muschetto | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871195 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882353 | Nettles et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882354 | Nielsen | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6892196 | Hughes | May 2005 | B1 |
6895426 | Cortright et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906717 | Couckuyt et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907423 | Weil et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915492 | Kurtenbach et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924797 | MacPhail | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6925605 | Bates et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928613 | Ishii | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934740 | Lawande et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941304 | Gainey et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6956429 | Elbanhawy | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6964025 | Angiulo | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981209 | Parikh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983889 | Alles | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988241 | Guttman et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990637 | Anthony et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990652 | Parthasarathy et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990654 | Carroll, Jr. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7027463 | Mathew et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032210 | Alloing et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039596 | Lu | May 2006 | B1 |
7044363 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046848 | Olcott | May 2006 | B1 |
7069538 | Renshaw | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7085757 | Dettinger | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107544 | Luke | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110936 | Hiew et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111238 | Kuppusamy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113941 | Arend | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117370 | Khan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134095 | Smith et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149983 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152207 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7181697 | Tai et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188073 | Tam et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7188317 | Hazel | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200636 | Harding | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206813 | Dunbar et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206814 | Kirsch | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212208 | Khozai | May 2007 | B2 |
7216301 | Moehrle | May 2007 | B2 |
7219305 | Jennings | May 2007 | B2 |
7240323 | Desai et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249325 | Donaldson | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7251640 | Baumard | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263668 | Lentz | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7277572 | MacInnes et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287233 | Arend | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290033 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7296241 | Oshiro et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7325204 | Rogers | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328409 | Awada et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337185 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346705 | Hullot et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346769 | Forlenza et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356772 | Brownholtz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360174 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370282 | Cary | May 2008 | B2 |
7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7386835 | Desai et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392249 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395221 | Doss et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7395500 | Whittle et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421660 | Charmock et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7421690 | Forstall et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426713 | Duggan et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7461077 | Greenwood | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7464343 | Shaw et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469385 | Harper et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472117 | Dettinger et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484213 | Mathew et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7499907 | Brown et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505954 | Heidloff et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530029 | Satterfield et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555707 | Labarge et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7565403 | Horvitz | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567964 | Brice et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584253 | Curbow et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7627561 | Pell et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664821 | Ancin et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7703036 | Satterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707255 | Satterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711742 | Bennett et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716593 | Durazo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739259 | Hartwell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747966 | Leukart et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7788598 | Bansal et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802199 | Shneerson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831902 | Sourov et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853877 | Giesen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865868 | Falzone Schaw et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870465 | VerSteeg | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7886290 | Dhanjal et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895531 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8117542 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8146016 | Himberger et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150930 | Satterfield et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8201103 | Dukhon et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239882 | Dhanjal et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255828 | Harris et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8285806 | Yu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8402096 | Affronti et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8484578 | Dukhon et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8605090 | Garg et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627222 | Hartwell et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638333 | Garg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8689137 | McCormack et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8762880 | Dukhon et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8799808 | Satterfield et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8839139 | Leukart et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9015621 | Dean et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015624 | Radtke et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9046983 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9098473 | Dukhon et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9098837 | Hill et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9223477 | Harris et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20010032220 | Ven Hoff | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034762 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035882 | Stoakley et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038395 | Holtzblatt et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040627 | Obradovich | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044736 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044741 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049677 | Talib et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007380 | Bauchot et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020024638 | Hidari et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029247 | Kawamoto | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037754 | Hama et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052721 | Ruff et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052880 | Fruensgaard et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052916 | Kloba et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054101 | Beatty | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054128 | Lau et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063734 | Khalfay et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070977 | Morcos et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073091 | Jain et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073156 | Newman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075330 | Rosenzweig et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078143 | DeBoor et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083054 | Peltonen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089543 | Ostergaard et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091697 | Huang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091739 | Ferlitsch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097266 | Hachiya et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099775 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116508 | Khan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122071 | Camara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123984 | Prakash | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123991 | Asami | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129052 | Glazer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133557 | Winarski | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135621 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020140740 | Chen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149623 | West et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149629 | Craycroft et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154178 | Barnett et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158876 | Janssen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163538 | Shteyn | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175938 | Hackworth | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175955 | Gourdol et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186257 | Cadiz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188515 | Nakata et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196293 | Suppan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005051 | Gottlieb | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005056 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009455 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011564 | Ushino et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011638 | Chung | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011639 | Webb | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014421 | Jung | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014490 | Bates et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016248 | Hayes Ubillos | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022700 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025732 | Prichard | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030025737 | Breinberg | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028560 | Kudrolli et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035917 | Hyman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038832 | Sobol | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043200 | Faieta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030043211 | Kremer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046528 | Haitani et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050986 | Matthews et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064707 | Voneyama | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066025 | Garner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069892 | Hind et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069900 | Hind et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070143 | Maslov | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084035 | Emerick, III | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093490 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097640 | Abrams et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098891 | Molander | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106024 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110191 | Handsaker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112278 | Driskell | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128243 | Okamoto | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132972 | Pang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135825 | Gertner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154254 | Awasthi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156140 | Watanabe | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160821 | Yoon | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163455 | Dettinger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163537 | Rohall et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167310 | Moody et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169284 | Dettinger et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177190 | Moody et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187586 | Katzenmaier et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195937 | Kircher et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200267 | Garrigues | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206646 | Brackett | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218611 | Ben-Tovim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220138 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226106 | McKellar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227487 | Hugh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229668 | Malik | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229673 | Malik | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233419 | Beringer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002941 | Thorne et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003351 | Sommerer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006570 | Gelb et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010513 | Scherr et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012633 | Helt | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021647 | Iwema et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024824 | Ferguson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030993 | Hong Huey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044735 | Hoblit | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056894 | Zaika et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061713 | Jennings | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068695 | Daniell et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073503 | Morales et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083432 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088359 | Simpson | May 2004 | A1 |
20040090315 | Mackjust et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093290 | Doss et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100504 | Sommer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100505 | Cazier | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107197 | Shen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109025 | Hullot et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109033 | Vienneau et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117451 | Chung | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119755 | Guibourge | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119760 | Grossman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122789 | Ostertag et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125142 | Mock et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128275 | Moehrle | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133854 | Black | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135811 | Pickering et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142720 | Smethers | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153968 | Ching et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153973 | Horwitz | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164983 | Khozai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168153 | Marvin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186775 | Margiloff et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189694 | Kurtz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192440 | Evans et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196309 | Hawkins | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205536 | Newman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212640 | Mann | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215612 | Brody | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221234 | Imai | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221309 | Zaner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230508 | Minnis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230906 | Pik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236796 | Bhatt et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239700 | Baschy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243938 | Weise et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254928 | Vronay | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260756 | Forstall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261013 | Wynn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268231 | Tunning | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268235 | Wason | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268270 | Hill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004989 | Satterfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004990 | Durazo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005235 | Satterfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005249 | Hill et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015361 | Payton et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015364 | Payton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021504 | Atchison | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021521 | Wycoff | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022116 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027779 | Schinner | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033614 | Lettovsky et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039142 | Jalon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043015 | Muramatsu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044500 | Orimoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055449 | Rappold, III | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057584 | Gruen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060337 | Chou et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071242 | Allen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086135 | Lu | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091576 | Relyea et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097465 | Giesen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108348 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114778 | Branson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114781 | Brownholtz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117179 | Ito et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132010 | Muller | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132053 | Roth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138552 | Venolia | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138576 | Baumert et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144157 | Moody et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144241 | Stata et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144284 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144560 | Gruen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144568 | Gruen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144572 | Wattenberg et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172262 | Lalwani | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177789 | Abbar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183008 | Crider et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185920 | Harper et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188043 | Cortright et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203975 | Jindal et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216863 | Schumacher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222985 | Buchheit | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223057 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223066 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223329 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234910 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240902 | Bunker et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251757 | Farn | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256867 | Walther et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278656 | Goldthwaite et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289109 | Arrouye et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289156 | Maryka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289159 | Hadley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015816 | Kuehner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020962 | Stark | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026033 | Brydon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026145 | Beringer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026213 | Yaskin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026242 | Kuhlmann et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036580 | Stata | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036945 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036946 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036950 | Himberger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036964 | Satterfield et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036965 | Harris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041545 | Heidloff et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047644 | Bocking et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053383 | Gauthier et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064434 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069604 | Leukart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069686 | Beyda et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074844 | Frankel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080303 | Sargent et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085502 | Sundararajan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095865 | Rostom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101051 | Carr et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101350 | Scott | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111931 | Johnson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117249 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060117302 | Mercer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129937 | Shafron | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132812 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155689 | Blakeley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161849 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161863 | Gallo | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168522 | Bala | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173824 | Bensky | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173961 | Turski et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200455 | Wilson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218500 | Sauve et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242557 | Nortis, III | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242575 | Winser | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248012 | Kircher et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259449 | Betz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271869 | Thanu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271910 | Burcham et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282817 | Darst et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294452 | Matsumoto | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294526 | Hambrick et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006206 | Dhanjal et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011258 | Khoo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033250 | Levin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050182 | Sneddon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050401 | Young et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055936 | Dhanjal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055943 | McCormack et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061306 | Pell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061307 | Hartwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061308 | Hartwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061738 | Taboada et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094230 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101299 | Shaw et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106951 | McCormack et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124696 | Mullender | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130276 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143662 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143671 | Paterson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180040 | Etgen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185826 | Brice et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203991 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260996 | Jakobson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266017 | Held et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279417 | Garg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282956 | Staats | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300168 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005247 | Khoo | Jan 2008 | A9 |
20080005249 | Hart | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005686 | Singh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034304 | Feuerbacher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040682 | Sorenson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046518 | Tonnison et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052670 | Espinosa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077571 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080098229 | Hartrell et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104505 | Keohane et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109787 | Wang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134138 | Chamieh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141242 | Shapiro | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155555 | Kwong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168146 | Fletcher | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178110 | Hill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216014 | Kurtenbach et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244440 | Bailey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090007003 | Dukhon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012984 | Ravid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083656 | Dukhon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100009 | Karp | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106375 | Carmel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144651 | Sprang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152349 | Bonev et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158173 | Palahnuk et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192845 | Gudipaty et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217192 | Dean et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222763 | Dukhon et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090319619 | Affronti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319911 | McCann | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011310 | Rainisto | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100060645 | Garg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100159967 | Pounds et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180226 | Satterfield et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191818 | Satterfield et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199261 | Shenfield et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211889 | Durazo et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223575 | Leukart et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100293470 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110072396 | Giesen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110138273 | Radtke et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110225249 | Forstall et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110296322 | Dhanjal et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120179993 | Himberger et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215866 | Satterfield et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120324394 | Harris et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130014048 | Satterfield et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140115526 | Hartwell et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140132609 | Garg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140258933 | Dukhon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150220263 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150309679 | Dean et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150339281 | Dukhon et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20120370771 | Dukhon et al. | Dec 2015 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005203411 | Mar 2006 | AU |
2007255043 | Aug 2012 | AU |
2 650 016 | Sep 2014 | CA |
2 512 036 | Nov 2015 | CA |
1553377 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1746914 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101243439 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102067166 | Jun 2013 | CN |
102317897 | Jul 2013 | CN |
102077163 | Oct 2013 | CN |
102077199 | Jan 2014 | CN |
1755599 | Aug 2014 | CN |
201080021957.4 | Nov 2014 | CN |
0 910 007 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1 077 405 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 104 151 | May 2001 | EP |
1 672 518 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 223 503 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 376 337 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1 462 999 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 542 133 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1564652 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 628 197 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1 628 199 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1628198 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1645972 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1 835 434 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1915001 | Apr 2008 | EP |
0 584 269 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2 329 813 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2382683 | Jun 2003 | GB |
2 397 148 | Jan 2004 | GB |
P 0027717 | Mar 2011 | ID |
P 0027754 | Mar 2011 | ID |
P 0029297 | Oct 2011 | ID |
03-043824 | Feb 1991 | JP |
04-186425 | Jul 1992 | JP |
04-312186 | Nov 1992 | JP |
05-204579 | Aug 1993 | JP |
06-052282 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-342357 | Dec 1994 | JP |
09-204289 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10-074217 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-326171 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-039292 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-175258 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-259200 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-353130 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-034775 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-503893 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-109673 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-222477 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-337944 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-324055 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-015719 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-101768 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-198630 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-216427 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-256258 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-256302 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-526820 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-308145 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-316630 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-078512 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-086893 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-102803 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-512578 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-145569 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-159261 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-185464 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-318842 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-342115 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-025550 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-31995 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-032041 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-115914 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-182353 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-236089 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-352849 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-059358 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2007-0280180 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-531165 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-047067 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-117019 | May 2008 | JP |
2009-507311 | Feb 2009 | JP |
4832024 | Sep 2011 | JP |
5021185 | Jun 2012 | JP |
5079701 | Sep 2012 | JP |
5139984 | Nov 2012 | JP |
5190452 | Feb 2013 | JP |
5193042 | Feb 2013 | JP |
5221757 | Mar 2013 | JP |
5266384 | May 2013 | JP |
5480894 | Feb 2014 | JP |
5486595 | Feb 2014 | JP |
5559817 | Jun 2014 | JP |
5559845 | Jun 2014 | JP |
5597698 | Aug 2014 | JP |
10-2001-0091344 | Oct 2001 | KR |
10-0359378 | Oct 2002 | KR |
10-2003-0070685 | Feb 2003 | KR |
10-0388254 | Jun 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0072539 | Sep 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0072539 | Sep 2003 | KR |
10-2004-0071713 | Aug 2004 | KR |
10-2004-0071813 | Aug 2004 | KR |
10-2005-0023805 | Mar 2005 | KR |
10-2005-0036702 | Apr 2005 | KR |
10-2006-0046735 | May 2006 | KR |
10-2007-0000506 | Jan 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0041234 | May 2008 | KR |
10-1130421 | Mar 2012 | KR |
10-1149960 | May 2012 | KR |
10-1149990 | May 2012 | KR |
10-1159334 | Jun 2012 | KR |
10-1238559 | Feb 2013 | KR |
10-1298338 | Aug 2013 | KR |
10-1298461 | Aug 2013 | KR |
10-1312867 | Sep 2013 | KR |
10-1323011 | Oct 2013 | KR |
315932 | Dec 2013 | MX |
322458 | Apr 2014 | MX |
323275 | Sep 2014 | MX |
323276 | Sep 2014 | MX |
146456 | Aug 2012 | MY |
147334 | Jul 2013 | MY |
149803 | Oct 2013 | MY |
1-2005-000404 | Aug 2011 | PH |
1-2005-000495 | Mar 2014 | PH |
1-2008-500356 | Aug 2014 | PH |
2001-122576 | Sep 2003 | RU |
2005-116667 | Nov 2006 | RU |
2005120362 | Jan 2007 | RU |
2005-130357 | Apr 2007 | RU |
2322687 | Apr 2008 | RU |
2327205 | Jun 2008 | RU |
2328034 | Jun 2008 | RU |
2332728 | Aug 2008 | RU |
2537776 | Jan 2015 | RU |
420953 | Feb 2001 | TW |
460839 | Oct 2001 | TW |
490652 | Jun 2002 | TW |
527812 | Apr 2003 | TW |
2003-05097 | Oct 2003 | TW |
569122 | Jan 2004 | TW |
200514018 | Apr 2005 | TW |
I254878 | May 2006 | TW |
2008-14632 | Mar 2008 | TW |
I368852 | Jul 2012 | TW |
1389002 | Mar 2013 | TW |
1389043 | Mar 2013 | TW |
I401577 | Jul 2013 | TW |
I512591 | Dec 2015 | TW |
WO 9221091 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9610231 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9639654 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9820410 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9904353 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9927495 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0155894 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02091162 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03003240 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03058519 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03098500 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004027672 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 9420921 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004056250 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2007030727 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007030696 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007033159 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007036762 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007027737 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008027477 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008121718 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009158171 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158172 | Dec 2009 | WO |
201007809 | Feb 2012 | ZA |
201007810 | Feb 2012 | ZA |
201007875 | Feb 2012 | ZA |
201104850 | Dec 2012 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 42 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Nov. 30, 2009, Application No. PCT/US2009/044059. |
International Search Report mailed Dec. 24, 2009, Application No. PCT/US2009/044292. |
Mexican Office Action Summary dated May 7, 2012 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/003342. |
Israeli Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2012 cited in Appln No. 189293. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013 in Appln No. PCT/US2009/044059, 8 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Mar. 19, 2013 in Appln No. 10-2008-7005659, 4 pgs. |
“NEO Pro—the total “find that email” solution!”; http://www.caelo.com/products/learn/. |
“VisNetic MailFlow”; http://www.deerfield.com/products/visnetic-mailflow/. |
Miser, “Special Edition Using Mac OS X v10.2”; Pub. Date Jan. 3, 2003; QUE; Spe. Ed.; pp. 272-275. |
Mori et al., “Design and Development of Multidevice User Interfaces through Multiple Logical Descriptions”; Aug. 2004; vol. 30; 14 pgs. |
EP Communication dated Jul. 17, 2013 in Appln No. EP 07 795 391.7, 9 pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2013 in Appln No. 201080021957.4, 12 pages. |
Russian Decision on Grant dated Aug. 12, 2013 in Appln No. 2010151922/08, 18 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, 109 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 35 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 42 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 2, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,287, 47 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2012 cited in Appln No. 189293, 4 pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2012 in Appln No. 169717, 4 pages. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 cited in Appln No. PI 20053260, 2 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2,511,101 3 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013 cited in Appln No. MX/a/2008/003342, 8 pages. |
Korean Notice of Rejection dated Feb. 22, 2013 in Appln No. 10-2008-7005078 13 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/002889, 11 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Rejection dated Feb. 25, 2013 in Appln No. 10-2008-7005366, 5 pgs. |
Japanese Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Mar. 12, 2013 in Appln No. 2011-516371, 4 pgs. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013 cited in Appln No. 200910148820A, 5 pgs. |
Japanese Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Mar. 19, 2013 in Appln No. 2011-514652, 6 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2013 in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008350, 28 pages. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2013 cited in Appln No. 200980124944.7, 7 pgs. |
EP Search Report dated Apr. 18, 2013 in Appln No. PCT/US2006/012724, 12 pgs. |
Philippines Substantive Examination Report dated Apr. 25, 2013 cited in Appln No. 1-2005-000495, 2 pages. |
EP Search Report dated May 10, 2013 cited in Appln No. PCT/US20091044292, 6 pages. |
Russian Office Action dated May 13, 2013 cited in Appln No. 2010-151922, 7 pages. |
Korean Final Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated May 20, 2013 cited in Appln No. 10-2008-7005939, 3 pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated May 23, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/003342, 8 pages. |
Chinese Notice on Third Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2013 cited in Appln No. 200980124644.9, 10 pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013 in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008351, 31 pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2010-014056, 6 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, 66 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,256, 73 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,784, 39 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 39 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, 34 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 29, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/954,952, 18 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 21, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,031, 13 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, 101 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,622, 29 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013 cited in Appln No. MX/a/2008/014849, 8 pgs. |
Malaysia Substantive Examination Adverse Report dated Jan. 15, 2013 in Appln No. PI 20084401, 3 pgs. |
EP Communication dated Jan. 10, 2013 cited in Appln No. PCT/US2010/021888, 8 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2,512,036, 2 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,289, filed Feb. 15, 2011 entitled “Floating Command Object”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,584, filed May 12, 2009 entitled “Hierarchically-Organized Control Galleries”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, filed May 6, 2011 entitled “Markup Based Extensibility for User Interfaces”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,939, filed Mar. 23, 2012 entitled “An Improved User Interface for Displaying a Gallery of Formatting Options Applicable to a Selected Object”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,031, filed Apr. 2, 2012 entitled “Automatic Grouping of Electronic Mail”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,572, filed May 4, 2012 entitled “Accessing an Out-Space User Interface for a Document Editor Program”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,084, filed Aug. 27, 2012 entitled “Command User Interface for Displaying Selectable Software Functionality Controls”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, filed Sep. 14, 2012 entitled “User Interface for Displaying Selectable Software Functionality Controls that are Relevant to a Selected Object”. |
Charles Rich et al., “Segmented Interaction History in a Collaborative Interface Agent,” 1997, ACM, pp. 23-30. |
Andrew Dwelly, “Functions and Dynamic User Interface,” 1989, ACM, pp. 371-381. |
Gordon Kurtenbach et al., “The Hotbox: Efficient Access to a Large Number of Menu-items,” ACM, 1999, pp. 231-237, May 1999. |
Charles Rich et al., “Adding a Collaborative Agent to Graphical User Interfaces,” 1996, ACM, pp. 21-30. |
Boyce, “Microsoft Outlook Inside Out,” 2001, pp. 67, 68, 109, 110, 230, 231, 310, 316-318, 798. |
Halvorson et al., “Microsoft Office XP Inside Out,” 2001, pp. 1005-1009, 1015, 1023-1028, 1036-1039, 1093. |
Riggsby et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6,” 2003, pp. 135-139. |
Riggsby et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6,” 2003, pp. 135-138, 607-612. |
Khare et al., “The Origin of (Document) Species,” University of California, 1998, 9 pgs. |
“Separate Structure and Presentation,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutoria15/1.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 4 pgs. |
“The Style Attribute and CSS Declarations,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/2, Aug. 20, 1998, 4 pgs. |
“What's Hot in Internet Services?” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/3, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
“The Style Element & CSS Selectors,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/4.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/5.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
“ID & Class Selectors, Pseudoclasses,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/6.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/7.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/8.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 2 pgs. |
“External Style Sheets,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/9.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs. |
Raman, “Cascaded Speech Style Sheets,” 1997, 7 pgs. |
“Primary Windows,” Accessed at http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/navigator/guidelines/primary.html on Feb. 23, 2007, 23 pgs. |
Schumaker, “User Interface Standards,” http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa217660(office.11.d=printer).aspx, Sep. 2001, 5 pgs. |
Budinsky et al., “WebSphere Studio Overview,” http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/sj/432/budinsky.html, May 6, 2004, 25 pgs. |
Gordon Padwick, Using Microsoft Outlook 2000, Que, Sp. Ed., May 1999, 5 pp. |
Becker et al., “Virtual Folders: Database Support for Electronic Messages Classification,” Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, pp. 163-170. |
Goldberg et al., “Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry,” Communication of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 61-70, Dec. 1992. |
Liu et al., “Continual Queries for Internet Scale Event-Driven Information Delivery, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,” vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 610-628, 1999. |
Chen et al., “NiagaraCQ: A Scalable Continuous Query System for Internet Databases,” Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Proc. of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 379-390, 2000. |
Marshall School of Business: “Workshop IV—Calendar,” http://www.marshall.usc.edu/computing/PDF—Files/Outlook/Workshop4, PDF, Apr. 10, 2000, pp. 1-4. |
M. Williams, “Programming Windows NT4: Unleashed,” Sams Publishing, Indianapolis, 1996, pp. index & 167-185. |
“Microsoft Outlook 2000: Introduction to Calendar,” Version Mar. 25, 2002, http://www.uakron.edu/its/learning/training/docs/Calendar032502.pdf, Mar. 25, 2002, pp. 1-52. |
Screen Dumps of Microsoft Outlook (1999, pp. 1-3). |
“To-do List—effective task management software” [on line], Aug. 3, 2004, http://web.archive.org/web/20040804103245/www.htpshareware.com/todolist/changes.txt and http://web.archive.org/web/20040803075026/www.htpshareware.com/todolist/index.htm>, all pages. |
“Rainy's Rainlendar” [online], Aug. 12, 2004, http://web.archive.org/web/20040811043048/www.ipi.fi/˜rainy/Rainlendard/Manual.html and http://web.archive.org/web/20040812092939/http://www.ipi.fi/˜rainy/index.php?pn=probjects&project=rainlendar>, all pages. |
Microsoft Windows XP Professional, Version 2002, Service pack 2, 3 pgs. |
Camarda, Using Microsoft Word 97, copyright 1997, QUE Corporation, pp. 412, 869. |
Marshall School of Business, Workshop 1—Introduction to Outlook & E-mail, Apr. 6, 2000, pp. 1-11. |
Jane Dorothy Calabria Burke, Ten Minute Guide to Lotus Notes 4.6, Publication date: Dec. 23, 1997, 2 pgs. |
Bill Dyszel, Microsoft Outlook 2000 for Windows for Dummies, Copyright 1999, pp. 82-86, 102-103, 141,143. |
Gina Danielle Venolia et al., Understanding Sequence and Reply Relationships within Email Conversations: A Mixed-Model Visualization, CHI 2003, Apr. 5-10, 2003, vol. No. 5, Issue No. 1, pp. 361-368. |
Screen Dumps Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, 4 pp. |
Screen Dumps Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, 5 pp. |
Habraken, Microsoft Office XP 8 in 1, published Jun. 5, 2001, http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0789725096/, 12 pp. |
Word 2002, Chapter 14; Paradigm Publishing Inc., copyright 2002; http://www.emcp.com/tech—tutorials/sig—irc/Signature—Word—Chapter—14.ppt, 21 pp. |
Microsoft Office Word 2003, Part of Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, 1983-2003 Microsoft Corporation, 5 pp. |
Microsoft Office 11 Beta Layperson's Specification, Copyright 2002, Microsoft Corporation, 28 pages. |
FrontPage 11 Beta Layperson's Specification, Copyright 2002, Microsoft Corporation, 12 pages. |
Office 11 Beta Letter, Copyright 2002, Microsoft Corporation, 6 pages. |
Microsoft XDocs Beta Layperson Specification, Copyright 2002, Microsoft Corporation, 3 pages. |
Microsoft Publisher 11 Beta Layperson's Specification, Copyright 2002, Microsoft Corporation, 13 pages. |
Microsoft Office Word 2003, Part of Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, 1983-2003 Microsoft Corporation, screen shot 1, 1 pp. |
Microsoft Office 2003, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, Microsoft Corporation, 10 pages. |
Screendumps—Microsoft Office, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, Microsoft Corporation, 10 pages. |
Screendumps—Microsoft Office Outlook, Microsoft Office Outlook Professional Edition 2003, Microsoft Corporation, 2 pages. |
Nielsen, Jacob. “Tabs, Used Right,” Alertbox, Sep. 17, 2007, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/tabs.html, 6 pages. |
“Managing the Code Editor and View” Microsoft Corporation, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z01zks9a(VS.71).aspk, 2008, all pages. |
Agarwal, Vikash K., “Creating a Visually Arresting User-Interface: A3D Tab Control Example,” Jan. 4, 2008, http://microsoft.apress.com/asptodayarchive/71723/creating-a-visually-arresting-user-interface-a-3d-tab-control-example, 12 pages. |
“Omni Web Help,” Omni Group, 2004, http://www.omnigroup.com/documentation/omniweb/browser/tabs.html, 2 pages. |
Hepfner, Troy, “New SOCET CXP Interface Improves Usability,” Sep. 2008, http://www.socetset.com/gxpmosaic/?p=95, 4 pages. |
“Creating Charts: An Introduction,” Excel for Chemists: . A Comprehensive Guide, E. Joseph Billo. http://www.ahut.edu.cn/yxsz/ahk/Teaching/Excel%for%20Chemists/ChQ2.pdf, all pages. |
Marsh, Bruce, Integrating Spreadsheet Templates and Data Analysis Into Fluid Power Instruction, Journal of Industrial Technology, vol. 16, No. 4, Aug. 2000-Oct. 2000. http://www.nait.org/jit/Articles/marsh071200.pdf, all pages. |
“TeeChart for .NET Charting Control,” Steema Software; accessed at: http://www.teechart.net/; accessed on Jan. 11, 2006, all pages. |
Oracle Discoverer Desktop User's Guide; 10g (9.0.4) for Windows; Part No. B10272-01; published 2003; http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B12166—01/bi/B10272—01/3graph.htm; pp. 1-18. |
Lisa K. Averett; Joshua R. Knisley; Mark A. Marvin; Haiti: Projecting Tactical Network and Systems Management; 1995 IEEE pp. 906-910. |
“Convert to Word 2007,” http://www.regencytraining.com/word-2007-conversion.html, Regency Training and Consulting, 2 pages (Date Printed Apr. 21, 2008). |
“Customer Story: SourceXtreme,” SourceXtreme—Trolltech, http://trolltech.com/customers/casestories/stories/sourcextreme/?searchterm=sourcextreme, 2 pages (Date Printed Apr. 22, 2008). |
“Inter-Widget Communication,” http://web.mit.edu/6.115/www/miscfiles/amulet/amulet-help/IWC.htm, 6 pages (Feb. 13, 2007). |
“The Technology in Document and Check Security,” http://www.securedoc.in/thetechnology.htm, 7 pages (Date Printed Apr. 21, 2008). |
Ando, R. et al., “Visualization-enabled multi-document summarization by Iterative Residual Rescaling,” Natural Language Engineering, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 67-86 (Mar. 2005) (2 page Abstract). |
Bos, B, “Re: A proposal for addition to HTML 3.0: Frames,” http://www.nyct.net/˜aray/htmlwg/95q3/1141.html, 5 pages (Sep. 21, 1995). |
de Candussio, N., “Common GUI Features Report,” Herschel CSDT Meeeting, pp. 1-21 (Sep. 2007). |
Krill, P., “Microsoft's Ribbon Interface Draws Frowns, Smiles,” InfoWorld, http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/03/04/10NF-microsoft-fluentui—1.html, 3 pages (Mar. 4, 2008). |
Rice, F, “Customizing the 2007 Office System Document Inspector,” http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa338203(d=printer).aspx, 10 pages (May 2006). |
Boyce, “Microsoft Outlook Inside Out,” 2001, pp. 133, 134, 721-728. |
Halvorson et al., “Microsoft Office XP Inside Out,” 2001, pp. 4, 5, 10, 11, 70-74, 281-288, 1010-1014. |
Pogue, David. “Windows XP Home Edition: The Missing Manual,” O'Reilly, 1st Edition, May 1, 2002, pp. 37, 38, 41. |
Screendumps—Microsoft Office, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, 13 pages. |
Berliner E.M. et al., “Microsoft Office 2003”, Feb. 24, 2004, p. 39-40, 120-124, 175-177, 233-234 [D1]. |
Berliner E.M. et al., “Microsoft Office 2003”, Feb. 24, 2004, p. 173-178 [D2]. |
Perronne et al. “Building Java Enterprise Systems with J2EE”, Publisher: Sams, Pub Date: Jun. 7, 2000 (pp. 1-8). |
Padwick, Gordon “Using Microsoft Outlook 2000,” 1999 Que Publishing, pp. 530-533. |
Slovak, Ken. “Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003.” 2003, Que Publishing, pp. 237-241. |
Microsoft Press, Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, 2002, pp. 374, 382. |
Riggsby, McCoy, Haberman and Falciani, “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6.” 2003, pp. 18, 22, 33-35, 47, 122, 123, 215-241, 378. |
“About Google Desktop Search”, http://www.desktop.google.com/about.html, Oct. 15, 2004, 8 pages. |
Find any file or email on your PC as fast as you can type!, http://www.xl.com, 2003, 1 page. |
“Lookout”, http://www.lookoutsoft.com, Apr. 22, 2005, 20 pages. |
“Yahoo to test desktop search”, http://news.com.com/yahoo+to+test+desktop+searcach/2100-1032—3-5486381.html, Dec. 9, 2004, 6 pages. |
“Microsoft reinvents its own wheel”, http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=20214, Dec. 14, 2004, 5 pages. |
“Microsoft Desktop Search (beta)”, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0.1895.1771841.00.asp, Mar. 2, 2005, all pages. |
“Windows Desktop Search”. Http://kunal.kundale.net/reviews/wds.html, Jul. 10, 2005, 7 pages. |
“Microsoft Enters Desktop Search Fray”, http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3447331, Dec. 13, 2004, 5 pages. |
Screendumps—Microsoft Office (Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003; 16 pages). |
Clifton, The Application Automation layer—Using XML to Dynamically Generale GUI Elements—forms and controls, The Code Project, Jun. 2003, pp. 1-37. |
ScreenShot of MS—Office—2003; (Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003; 6 pages). |
Halvorson et al., Microsoft Office Professional Official Manual, Aug. 20, 2002, 10 pgs. |
Bellavista et al., “A Mobile Infrastructure for Terminal, User, and Resource Mobility”, Network Operations and Management Symposium, NOMS 2000, pp. 877-890, IEEE/IFIP. |
“Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2007”, © 2006, Microsoft Corporation; 66 pgs. |
Adler, “Emerging Standards for Component Software,” Cybersquare, 1995 IEEE, 10 pgs. |
Chamberland, et al., “IBM VisualAge for Java,” vol. 37, No. 3, 1998, 26 pgs., http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/sj/373/chamberland.html [Accessed Feb 6, 2007]. |
Zykov, “ConceptModeller: A Problem-Oriented Visual SDK for Globally Distributed Enterprise Systems.” Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computer Science and Information Technologies, CSIT 2005, 4 pgs. |
“Create Office add-ins: ribbons, toolbars, taskpanes, menus etc.”, http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/feed/, Jul. 4, 2007, all pages. |
“RibbonX API: Extend the 2007 Office System with Your Own Ribbon Tabs and Controls”, 2007, Microsoft Corporation, http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/07/02RibbonX/de-fault.aspx, all pages. |
“What's New in Excel 2007”, Feb. 26, 2007. |
Whitechapel et al., “Microsot Visual Studio 2005 Tools for the 2007 Microsoft Office”, Sep. 2006, http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:kXdufDB6o-wJ:download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/d/32db7049-bc04-4c79-a91b-7f62eaae754a/VSTO2005SE—Tutorial.doc+This+tutorial+focuses+on+the+new+features+introduced+in+VSTO+2005—SE&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=in, all pages. |
“The New “Office 2007” User Interface”, Microsoft Corporation © 2005, 32 pgs. |
“The New Look in Office 12 / Office 2007”, OFFICE Watch, posted Sep. 20, 2005, 9 pgs. |
Atwood, “Sometime a Word is Worth a Thousand Icons”, Coding Horror, Feb. 22, 2006, 9 pgs. |
Seo et al, “Hangul Office 2000 Tutoring Book”, Sep. 15, 2000, 16 pgs. |
Office 2007, Microsoft, Released on Nov. 6, 2006, 23 pgs. |
The Discussion Board Component of Blackboard: An Instructor's Guide; Aug. 2004; 23 pgs. |
Hock, “Yahoo! to the Max”; May 10, 2005; 5 excerpted pgs. |
Homeworking Forum; archived Dec. 6, 2004; 11 pgs. |
Gina Danielle Venolia et al., Supporting Email Workflow, revised Dec. 2001; 11 pgs. |
Mock et al., “An Experimental Framework for Email Categorization and Management”, Sep. 9-12, 2001, 3 pgs. |
Yang, “Email Categorization Using Fast Machine Learning Algorithms”, 2002, 8 pgs. |
Islam et al., “Email Categorization Using Multi Stage Classification Technique”, 2007, 3 pgs. |
“Look and Layout”, retrieved at <<http://liv.ac.uk/csd/email/outlook/layout.htm>>, University of Liverpool, 9 pgs. |
“Preview Pane in Conversation: 4 pane view”, 2005, Zinbra Inc., 3 pgs. |
“Reading Pane in Conversation View”, retrieved at <<http://www.zimbra.com/forums/users/5918-reading-pane-conversation-view.html>>, 5 pgs. |
Ohmori, Yasuo et al., “Eigyo Mind—A Sales Support Tool,” PFU Tech. Rev., vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 32-38, PFU Limited, May 1, 1999. |
Dr. Dobb's Journal; “Windows 95 Common Controls”; May 1, 1995; 12 pgs. |
Aoyagi, Hideo, “Mail Mac Fan Special 33”; Manichi Communications Inc., Mar. 1, 2004, 5 pgs. |
Morita, Utako; “Literature Searching System, ‘JDream’”; Online Search; vol. 23, No. 4; The Society of Japan Terminal, Dec. 2002; 5 pgs. |
Milstein, Sarah; “The Missing Manual: The book that should have been in the box”, First Edition; O'Reilly Japan, Inc.; Nov. 25, 2004; 1 pg. |
Cole; “New Arrival! Forefront of Downloading”; Mac People; vol. 11, No. 10; ASCII Corporation; Aug. 31, 2005; 1 pg. |
Sada, Morihiro; “Clue for Managing Common Data Filed on Server”; Business Personal Computer Age; vol. 15, No. 7; Dempa Publications, Inc.; Jul. 1, 1997; 1 pg. |
Douglas et al., “Dynamic Popup Menu Titles”; IP.Com Journal, IP.Com Inc., West Henrietta, NY, Aug. 1, 1992, 2 pgs. |
Haden et al.; “Scrollable Popup Menu with Selection Tracking Display of Graphical Objects”; IP.Com Journal, IP.Com Inc., West Henrietta, NY, Aug. 1, 1994, 6 pgs. |
“Index Card Metaphor for Multiple Property Sheets Associated with a Given Object”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, International Business Machines Corp., vol. 33, No. 3A, Aug. 1, 1990, 2 pgs. |
“Menu Selection Method for Related Attributes”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, International Business Machines Corp., vol. 33, No. 6B, Nov. 1990, 3 pgs. |
Ribbons; Microsoft; © 2012 Microsoft; http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/cc872782.aspx; 45 pgs. |
AutoCAD 2011—Customization Guide; Feb. 2010; Autodesk, Inc.; http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/acad—acg.pdf; 554 pgs. |
Changing a Graph Type: Ultimate Illustration of Excel 2002 for Windows XP, General Book, X-media Corp., Aug. 31, 2002, p. 224. |
Russel et al., (hereinafter “Russel”); “Special Edition Using Microsoft ® Office Outlook ® 2003”; Que publishing on Sep. 25, 2003, 71 pgs. |
Redmond, Tony; Excerpt from Book; Microsoft Exchange Server 2003; Published 2003; 14 pgs. |
Microsoft Office 2007 Word Help, 3 pgs. |
Alexander, Keeping New Messages Marked ‘Unread’ (2007), http://certcities.com/editorial/colums/story.asp?EditorialsD=243, 2 pgs. |
Wiley, Microsoft® Office Outlook® 2007 for Dummies®, 9 pgs. |
Danish Written Opinion Appl. No. SG 200504508-3 dated Sep. 18, 2006, all pages. |
Danish Search Report Appl. No. SG 200504475-5 dated Sep. 19, 2006, all pages. |
NZ Application No. 541301, Examination Report dated Jul. 25, 2005, all pages. |
NZ Application No. 541300, Examination Report dated Jul. 25, 2005, all pages. |
NZ Application No. 541299, Examination Report dated Jul. 25, 2005, all pages. |
Australian Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2007 cited in Singapore Application No. 200504474-8, all pages. |
PCT Written Opinion and Search Report dated Jan. 9, 2007 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2006/033809, all pages. |
PCT Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2007 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2006/035467, all pages. |
PCT Search Report dated Feb. 26, 2007 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2006/034993, all pages. |
European Communicated dated Oct. 20, 2005 cited in EP Application No. 04102463.0-2211 PCT/, all pages. |
Australian Written Opinion/Search Report cited in Singapore Application No. 200505257-6 mailed Feb. 12, 2007, all pages. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2007 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2006/012724, all pages. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 27, 2007 in PCT/US2007/012573, 9 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092146.4, all pages. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092139.4, all pages. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092141.1, all pages. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092142.6. , all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Apr. 21, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1-2005-000405, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Apr. 21, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1-2005-000406, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1770-05, no English Translation, all pages. |
Chinese First Office Action dated May 23, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Jun. 23, 2008 cited in Appln No. 04102463.9, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Jul. 31, 2008 cited in Appln No. 12005000495, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Aug. 19, 2008 cited in Appln No. 12005000405, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Sep. 12, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1200500406, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092141.1, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510092139.4, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2008 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2008 cited in Application EP 06 79 0087, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1768-2005, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1770-2005, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2008 cited in Appln No. 1769-2005, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2009 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008349, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2009 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008351 English language only, all pages. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2512-2005, all pages. |
European Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2009, cited in Appln No. 06790087.8, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2009 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Jun. 9, 2009 cited in EP Application No. 07795391.7-1225, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2009 cited in Appln. No. PA/a/2005/007073, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2009 cited in Appln No. 200510092139.4, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005120363/28(023023), all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2009 cited in Appln. No. 200680018095.3, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125837/09(029011), all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125831/09(029005), all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2009 cited in Appln No. 169716, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2009 cited in Appln No. 169718, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 7, 2009 cited in EP Application No. 09006972.5-2211, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125836/09(029010), all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125839/09(029013), all pages. |
European Communication dated Sep. 14, 2009 cited in Appln. No. 07795391.7-1225, all pages. |
European Communication dated Sep. 28, 2009 cited in Appln No. 09006972.5-2211, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2009 cited in Appln No. 170668, all pages. |
New Zealand Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2009 cited in NZ Application No. 566363, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2009 cited in Appln No. 200510092142.6, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005120363/09(023023), all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125837/09(029011), all pages. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2009 cited in Appln No. 1770-2005, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2009 cited in Appln No. 200680033212.3, all pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2009/046341, all pages. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2009 cited in Appln No. 1768-2005, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2009 cited in Appln No. 2005125836/09(029010), all pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 29, 2009 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2009/046344, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2010 cited in Appln No. 200680032564.7, all pages. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2010 cited in Appln No. 1769-2005, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2010 cited in Appln No. 200510092142.6, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Mar. 11, 2010 cited in Appln No. 1-2005-000405, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2010 cited in Appln No. 200780020312.7, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005203411, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005203412, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005203409, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005203410, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated May 4, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005/008354, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated May 28, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005202717, all pages. |
European Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2010 cited in EP Application No. 06814358.5, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2010 cited in Appln No. 169718, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2010 cited in Appln No. 200680033212.3, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2010 cited in RU Application No. 2008109034, w/translation, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2005/008354, all pages. |
PCT Written Opinion and Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2010 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2010/021888, all pages. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Adverse Report dated Sep. 30, 2010 cited in Appln No. PI 20052959, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2010 cited in Appln No. 2006284908, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2010 cited in Appln No. 169716, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2010 cited in Appln No. 200680030421.2, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 11, 2010 cited in CN Application No. 200680032789.2, w/translation, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2010 cited in Application No. 2008109034, w/translation, all pages. |
PCT Written Opinion and Search Report dated Nov. 29, 2010 cited in International Application No. PCT/US2010/034277, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2011 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008354, all pages. |
Australian OA dated Jan. 17, 2011 cited in Application No. 2006287408, all pages. |
Notice on Reexamination dated Jan. 21, 2011 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
Chinese Decision on Reexamination dated Feb. 1, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2011 cited in Appln No. 200680033212.3, all pages. |
Egypt Official Decision dated Mar. 14, 2011 cited in Appln No. 2005080371, all pages. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Adverse Report dated Mar. 15, 2011 cited in Appln No. PI 20053260, all pages. |
2nd Notice on Reexamination dated Mar. 25, 2011 cited in Appln No. 200510089514.X, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2011 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008351, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2011 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008349, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2011 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008350, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2011 cited in Application No. 200680032789.2, w/translation, all pages. |
Philippines Examiner's Action dated Apr. 12, 2011 cited in Appln No. 1-2005-00404, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated May 6, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2005-236089, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated May 6, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2005-236087, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Rejection dated May 17, 2011 cited in Appln No. 10-2004-48176, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated May 19, 2011 cited in Appln No. 200780020312.7, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated May 26, 2011 cited in Appln. No. MX/a/2009/004151, all pages. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2011 cited in JP Application No. 2008-530229, w/translation, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2011 cited in Appln No. 2008147090, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2011 cited in Appln No. 200680030421.2, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2011 cited in Appln No. 20680018095.3, all pages. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jul. 21, 2011 cited in Appln No. 20068032789.2, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Jul. 22, 2011 cited in Appln No. 10-2005-0058160, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Aug. 12, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2005-184990, all pages. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 23, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 10-2005-0067236, all pages. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 23, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 10-2005-0067411, all pages. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 29, 2011 cited in Appin. No. 10-2005-0066460, all pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2007255043, all pages. |
3rd Official Notice, Mailing No. 134028, dated Sep. 16, 2001 cited in Appln. No. PH1707009, all pages. |
4th Official Notice, Mailing No. 134052, dated Sep. 16, 2001 cited in Appln. No. PH1707009, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action Summary, dated Sep. 22, 2011 cited in Appln. No. MX/A/2008/003342, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2011 cited in Appln. No. MX/a/2008/014849, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 3, 2011 cited in Appln No. 10-2005-0067257, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 4, 2011 cited in Appln No. 2008-513476, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 11, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2008-530229, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 200910148820.4, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 25, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 2008-531249, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 200980124383.0, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2011 cited in Appln. No. 200680018095.3, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2011 cited in Appln No. 06803424.8, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Dec. 16, 2011 cited in Appln No. 2008-529218, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Rejection dated Jan. 30, 2012 cited in Appln No. 10-2004-0048176, all pages. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Adverse Report dated Jan. 31, 2012 cited in Appln No. PI 20053258, all pages. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Adverse Report dated Jan. 31, 2012 cited in Appln No. PI 20053259, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Feb. 3, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2008-530218, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2012 cited in Appln No. MX/A/2008/002889 with summary, all pages. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2012 cited in Appln No. 94123640, with Eng Lang Summary, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 23, 2012 cited in Appln No. 05107153.8, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2012 cited in Appln No. 170668, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 cited in Appln No. 05107184.3, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200980124664.9, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 1, 2012 cited in Appln No. 05107157.9, all pages. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Mar. 7, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200780020312.7, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200980124383.0, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection dated Mar. 9, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2008-513476, all pages. |
Taiwan Search Report dated Mar. 14, 2012 cited in Appln No. 094123420, all pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2012 cited in Appln No. 05107186.6, all pages. |
Taiwan Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 10120306600, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 1560-2010, w/English Language Summary, all pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 1559-2010, w/English Language Summary, all pages. |
India First Examination Report dated Mar. 30, 2012 cited in Appln No. 1817/DEL/2005, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2008-530229, all pages. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200680018095.3, all pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated May 3, 2012 cited in Appln No. 169718, all pages. |
Taiwan Office Action dated May 14, 2012 cited in Appln No. 94122180, with Eng Lang Summary, all pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated May 11, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2009-513223, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2012 cited in Appln No. MX/a/2008/014849, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2012 in Appln No. 200910148820.4, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action Summary dated Jun. 25, 2012 in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008354, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124944.7, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Jul. 2, 2012 cited in Appln No. 10-2012-0024393, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2012 in Appln No. 201080008789.5, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Jul. 19, 2012 cited in Appln No. 10-2007-7024571, all pages. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jul. 31, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200680018095.3, all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124945.1, all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124383.0, all pages. |
Malaysian Examination Report dated Aug. 30, 2012 in Appln No. PI 20080400, all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124944.7, all pages. |
Mexican Office Action Summary dated Sep. 18, 2012 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/003342, all pages. |
EP Communication dated Sep. 26, 2012 cited in Appln No. PCT/US2006034993, all pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Nov. 12, 2012 cited in KR-10-2008-7005939, all pages. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2012 cited in Appln No. 1559-2010, all pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2,512,102, all pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2,512,047, all pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2012 cited in Appln No. 2010140069, 8 pgs., all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2012 cited in Appln No. 200980124644.9, 10 pgs., all pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124944.7, 14 pgs., all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2012 in Appln No. 200980124945.1, 8 pgs., all pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2013 in Appln No. 201080008789.5, 8 pgs., all pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2013 in Appln No. 201080021957.4, 9 pgs., all pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2013 in Appln No. 2,512,155, 6 pgs., all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/896,384, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 27, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056, all pages. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 12, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 4, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,407, all pages. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Jan. 23, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,407, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 4, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 21, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,928, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,941, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 13, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056 , all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 6, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,800, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 4, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 21, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,928, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 28, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/848,774, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,442, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 22, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,941, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 28, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 30, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 19, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,928, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 27, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,416, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 9, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,800, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686, all pages. |
U.S. Official Acton dated Nov. 13, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,278, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 6, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,941, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 9, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,561, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 7, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 28, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 8, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 10, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,278, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686, all pages. |
U.S. Official Acton dated Jun. 19, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 4, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 4, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 17, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,561, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 15, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/217,071, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 23, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,278, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 9, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 10, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 6, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, all pages. |
U.S. Official Acton dated Jan. 7, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 19, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 22, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 30, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/217,071, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/823,999, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/144,642, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 25, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, all pages. |
U.S. Official Acton dated Jun. 22, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 25, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,82, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 6, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 2, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 6, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/144,642, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/217,071, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 27, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 9, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 22, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,923, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,256, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 29, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,787, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/823,999, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 6, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/144,642, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 11, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 14, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,784, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 21, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 21, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,256, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 12, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,923, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 9, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,584, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 8, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 8, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,784, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,386, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 14, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,758, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 25, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/144,642, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,584, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 27, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,386, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 5, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,758, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/144,642, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,287, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/769,787, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 7, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,784, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 13, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,031, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 23, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 5, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,287, all pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, 76 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/954,952, 86 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 31, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 49 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/032,094, filed Sep. 19, 2013 entitled “User Interface for Displaying Selectable Software Functionality Controls that are Relevant to a Selected Object”, Satterfield et al. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013 cited in Appln. No. MX/a/2008/003342, 9 pages. |
Israeli Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2013 cited in Appln No. 170668, 4 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Sep. 19, 2013 in Appln No. 2012-153634, 6 pages |
Mexican Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/014849, 9 pages. |
EP Communications to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Oct. 4, 2013 in Appln No. 09 006 972.5, 13 pages. |
Canadian OA dated Oct. 7, 2013 in Appln No. 2,650,016, 2 pages. |
Chilean Third Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2013 in Appln No. 2512-2005, 7 pages. |
Mexican Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2013 cited in Appln. No. MX/a/2010/013566, 8 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, 102 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, 24 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 30, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,256, 31 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, 113 pgs. |
Inoue; “Let's Learn PowerPoint Using Actual Samples”; Nikkei PC21, Japan, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Apr. 1, 2008, vol. 13, No. 7, 5 pgs.—No English Translation. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2014 cited in JP Application No. 2012-510906 w/translation. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Report dated Jan. 15, 2014 in Appln No. PI 20080508. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2014 in Appln No. 2,511,101, 4 pgs. |
EP Communication dated Feb. 11, 2014 cited in Appln No. 09 798 374.6. |
Mexican Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2014 cited in Appln No. MX/a/2008/003342, 8 pgs. |
EP Communication on Decision to Refuse dated Feb. 20, 2014 cited in Appln No. 09 006 972.5. |
Australian Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Appln No. 2009262834, 3 pgs. |
Australian Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Appln No. 2009262833, 3 pgs. |
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2014 in Appln No. 2009260596, 4 pgs. |
Australian Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2014 in Appln No. 2009271517, 3 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 29, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,287, 44 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 4, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,020, 149 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 26, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/954,952, 38 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 3, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, 38 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 4, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 45 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/226,421, filed Mar. 24, 2014 entitled “Exposing Non-Authoring Features Through Document Status Information in an Out-Space User Interface”. |
EP Communication dated Jan. 27, 2014 in Appln No. 09 767 2208, 7 pgs. |
Norway Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2014 in Appln No. 20053655, 4 pgs. |
Norway Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2014 in Appln No. 20053658, 4 pgs. |
Chilean Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2014 in Appln No. 2804-2011, 7 pgs. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2014 in Appln. No. 98118252, 10 pgs. |
India First Examination Report dated Mar. 19, 2014 in Appln No. 1818/DEL/2005, 1 pg. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2014 in Appln No. 201080021957.4, 6 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2014 in Appln No. 2,512,155, 9 pgs. |
Australian Second Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2014 in Appln No. 2009271517, 3 pgs. |
Philippines Substantive Examination Report dated Apr. 30, 2014 cited in Appln No. 1-2008-500356, 1 pg. |
Ramamritham et al., Scheduling Algorithms and Operating Systems Support for Real-Time Systems; © 1994; IEEE; 13 pages. |
Zweben et al., Scheduling and Rescheduling with Iterative Repair, ©1993; IEEE; 9 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 42 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 25, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, 42 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2013 cited in Appln No. 1611334, 4 pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Nov. 7, 2013 cited in KR-10-2008-7029272, 7 pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2013 in Appln No. 200680032789.2, 6 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 15, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 33 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506, 25 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,132, filed Dec. 27, 2013 entitled “Expanded Search and Find User Interface”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,531, filed Jan. 8, 2014 entitled “Modifying and Formatting a Chart Using Pictorially Provided Chart Elements”. |
Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2013 in Appln No. 2,618,169. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jan. 13, 2014 in Appln No. 200980124644.9. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, 45 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,523, filed Jun. 24, 2013 entitled “Communication Between a Document Editor-in-Space User Interface and a Document Editor Out-Space User Interface”, Dukhon et al. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2008/002889, 13 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2013 in Appln No. 2,512,036, 3 pages. |
India First Examination Report dated Oct. 21, 2013 cited in Appln No. 1017/DEL/2004, 2 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2013 in Appln No. 2,512,047, 3 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2013 in Appln No. 2,512,102, 3 pages. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 8, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, 114 pgs. |
Embedding and Linking Excel Worksheets into Word; 2001, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 6 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action dated May 15, 2014 in Appln No. 209047, 6 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action dated May 15, 2014 in Appln No. 209048, 15 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action Issued for Patent Application No. 2618169, Mailed Date: Sep. 9, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Taiwan Office Action and Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 98145363, Mailed Date: Oct. 2, 2014, 25 Pages. |
Chilean Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2014 in Appln No. 2804-2011, 5 pgs. (w/o English Translation). |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Report dated Nov. 14, 2014 in Appln No. PI 2010005637, 3 pgs. |
India First Examination Report dated Dec. 23, 2014 in Appln No. 1819/del/2005, 2 pgs. |
Norwegian Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2014 in Appln No. 20053658 4 pgs. |
Norwegian Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2014 in Appln No. 20053655, 3 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, 42 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797, 47 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action Received in Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/013566, Mailed Dated: Jun. 12, 2013, 3 Pages. |
Israeli Office Action Received in Patent Application No. 209011, Mailed Dated: Sep. 10, 2013, 5 Pages. |
Chilean Office Action Received in Patent Application No. 2804-2011, Mailed Date: Apr. 4, 2014, 7 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 10, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/954,952, 52 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 18, 2014 in U.S. No. Appl. 11/782,059, 41 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,084, 185 pgs. |
Ringel et al., “Automated Message Prioritization: Making Voicemail Retrieval More Efficient”; In CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Apr. 20, 2002; pp. 592-593. |
Kumar et al., “A personal agent application for the semantic web”; In AAAI Fall Symposium on Personalized Agents; 2002; pp. 1-8. |
Gorniak, Peter; “Sorting email messages by topic”; 1998; 1 pg. |
Maes et al., “Learning Interface Agents”; In AAAI (vol. 93); 1993; pp. 459-465. |
Russian Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 2010152843, Mailed Date: Feb. 20, 2014, 16 Pages. (MS# 323309.15). |
Israeli Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Appin No. 209012, 6 pgs. (14917.1832ILWO). |
Mexican Office Action Received for Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/008349, Mailed Date: Mar. 14, 2014, Filed Date: Aug. 5, 2005, 12 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 25, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,572, 117 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,939, 133 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013 in Appln No. MX/a/2011/011749, 10 pgs. |
Malaysian Notice of Allowance Received in Patent Application No. PI 20080400, Mailed Date: Sep. 13, 2013, Filed Date: Aug. 29, 2006, 2 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance Received for Korea Republic of (KR) Patent Application No. 10-2008-7005939, Mailed Date: Nov. 20, 2013, Filed Date: Sep. 12, 2006, 2 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
Japanese Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 2011-550149, Mailed Date: Jan. 20, 2014, Filed Date: Jan. 22, 2010, 5 Pages. |
Australian Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 2010216342, Mailed Date: Mar. 14, 2014, Filed Date: Jan. 22, 2010, 3 Pages. |
Mexican Notice of Allowance Received in Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/002889, Mailed Date: Apr. 1, 2014, Filed Date: Aug. 29, 2006, 1 Page. |
Russian Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 2011134380, Mailed Date: Apr. 5, 2014, Filed Date: Jan. 22, 2010, 22 Pages. |
Australian Notice of Allowance Received for Australia Patent Application No. 2009262833, Mailed Date: Apr. 16, 2014, Filed Date: Jun. 5, 2009, 2 Pages. |
Australian Office Action dated Apr. 30 2014 in Appln No. 2010247882, 3 pgs. |
Taiwan Search Report dated May 7, 2014 cited in Appln No. 098117357, 13 pgs. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 2011-550149, Mailed Date: May 8, 2014, Filed Date: Jan. 22, 2010, 4 Pages. |
Australian Second Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 2010216342, Mailed Date: May 12, 2014, Filed Date: Jan. 22, 2010, 3 Pages. |
Taiwan Search Report dated May 12, 2014 cited in Appln No. 098119245, 11 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680032789.2, Mailed Date: May 15, 2014, Filed Date: Sep. 8, 2006, 3 Pages. |
Russian Decision on Grant dated May 20, 2014 in Appln No. 2011145984/08, 24 pgs. |
Japanese Final Decision of Rejection dated May 27, 2014 in Appln No. 2012-110939, 4 pgs. |
EP Search Report dated Jun. 2, 2014 in Appln No. PCT/US2010/034277, 6 pgs. |
EP Communication dated Jun. 2, 2014 in Appln No. 07 795 391.7, 9 pgs. |
Chilean Second Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014 in Appln No. 1987-2011, 12 pgs. |
Russian Decision on Grant dated Jul. 20, 2014 in Appln No. 2010138162, 14 pgs.—No English Language Translation. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014 cited in Appln No. 2,512,155, 8 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014 cited in Appln No. 2,512,102, 7 pgs. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2014 cited in Appln No. 200780020312.7, 13 pgs. |
Mexican Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 cited in Appln No. PA/a/2005/008349, 18 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 14, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, 34 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 30 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,289, 188 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/372,386, 93 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,633, 36 pgs. |
Microsoft Office XP/2002, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft—Office—XP, May 31, 2001; 3 pgs. |
Akamatsu, “Touch with a Mouse, A Mouse Type Interface Device with Tactile and Force Display”; © IEEE; 1995; 5 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014 in Appln No. 194785, 5 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2014 in Appln No. 2,512,036, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2014 in Appln No. 201210079579.6, 11 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2014 in Appln No. 2,617,182, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Decision on Reexamination dated Nov. 18, 2014 in Appln. No. 200910148820.4, 15 pgs. |
India First Examination Report Issued in Patent Application No. 1820/DEL/2005, Mailed Date: Mar. 20, 2014, 1 Page. |
Israel Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 169717, Mailed Date: Oct. 29, 2014, 1 Page; (w/o English Translation). |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 10, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, 47 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, 35 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 28, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,031, 100 pgs. |
Indonesian Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. P00200500444, Mailed Date: Jan. 16, 2015, 3 Pages.(w/o English Translation). |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2015 in Appln No. 200910148820.4, 12 pgs. |
Israeli Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 213908, Mailed Date: Feb. 3, 2015, 3 pages. (w/o English Translation). |
India Examination Report dated Feb. 17, 2015 in Appln No. 1568/DEL/2005, 3 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2015 in Appln No. 2,848,667, 5 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2015 in Appln No. 2,848,700, 4 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/665,112, filed Mar. 23, 2015 entitled “Hierarchically-Organized Control Galleries”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/635,605, filed Mar. 2, 2015 entitled “Command User Interface for Displaying Selectable Software Functionality Controls”. |
“Microsoft Office 2003 Editions Product Guide”, Published on: Sep. 2003, Available at: tp://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCoQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.microsoft.com%2Fdownload%2F0%2Ff%2F1%2F0f1d5b1f-53bc-47c3-bf6f-ac6d67cf9766%2FOffice2003Guide.doc&ei=CKTkVPBCgb-xBL6qgvAH&usg=AFQjCNEpNk4IFH6m27BXr48lKv1kRXo—xA, 167 pgs. |
Baker; “Configuring the Pages Pane in Acrobat”; Apr. 22, 2004; Planet PDF; 4 pgs. |
Murray; First Look 2007 Microsoft Office System; Jun. 21, 2006; Microsoft Press; 16 pgs. |
Schwartz, Microsoft Office 2007 for Windows: Visual QuickStart Guide, 11 pgs. |
Lyons et al., The Oval Menu-Evolution and Evaluation of a Wedget, © 1996; IEEE; 8 pgs. |
Norwegian Office Action Received for Patent Application No. 20053656, Mailed Date: Nov. 19, 2014, 2 pgs. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Report dated Jan. 30, 2015 in Appln No. PI 2010005439, 3 pgs. |
Malaysian Modified Substantive Examination Report dated Jan. 30, 2015 in Appln No. PI 2010005558, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2015 in Appln No. 200780020312.7, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 37 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,572, 40 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 27, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 68 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 16, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,084, 19 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,822, 40 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 29, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,939, 43 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/816,844, filed Aug. 3, 2015 entitled “Accessing an Out-Space User Interface for a Document Editor Program”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,698, filed Aug. 31, 2015 entitled “Accessing an Out-Space User Interface for a Document Editor Program”. |
Mexican Office Action Issued in Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/011749, Mailed Date: Aug. 2, 2013, 6 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
Japanese Office Action Issued in Japan Patent Application No. 2012-510906, Mailed Date: Jan. 16, 2014, 4 Pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 2012-510906, Mailed Date: Jul. 10, 2014, 3 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
Israeli Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2015 in Appln No. 213908, 5 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 10-2010-7029199, Mailed Date: Apr. 24, 2015, 2 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
Israeli Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 215418, Mailed Date: Apr. 28, 2015, 3 Pages. |
India First Examination Report dated May 6, 2015 cited in Appln No. 1979/DELNP/2008, 2 pgs. |
EP Communication dated May 18, 2015 cited in 10 775 348.5, 7 pgs. |
Taiwan Office Action dated May 22, 2015 cited in Appln No. 101133155 with Eng Lang Summary, 4 pgs. |
Taiwan Office Action dated May 25, 2015 cited in Appln No. 102112935 with Eng Lang Summary, 4 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated May 26, 2015 cited in Appln No. 2,618,169, 4 pgs. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2015 in Appln No. 2,512,036, 1 pg. |
Malaysia Substantive Examination Report dated Jun. 30, 2015 in Appln No. PI 2010005439, 2 pgs. |
Chinese Notice on Reexamination dated Jul. 8, 2015 cited in Appln No. 200980124644.9, 8 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2015 in Appln No. 2,725,046, 5 pgs. |
Norwegian Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2015 in Appln No. 20053655, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2015 in Appln No. 200910148820.4, 6 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2015 in Appln No. 2,724,201, 5 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Sep. 30, 2015 in Appln No. 10-2010-7028097, 7 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2015 in Appln No. 2,724,681, 7 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Oct. 19, 2015 in Appln No. 10-2010-7028989, 7 pgs. (No English Language Translation). |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 12, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, 26 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 17, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,031, 12 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,531, 135 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059, 30 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,084, 15 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 14, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/142,927, 31 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,939, 25 pgs. |
Canadian Office Action Issued in Application No. 2,848,700, Mailed Date: Oct. 15, 2015, 4 Pages. |
Japanese Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 2014-163396, Mailed Date: Oct. 21, 2015, 5 Pages. |
Canadian Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 2,512,155, Mailed Date: Nov. 30, 2015, 7 Pages. |
Chinese Fifth Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2015 in Appln No. 200910148820.4, 6 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 10, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,531, 31 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,668, 28 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection Issued in Patent Application No. 10-2011-7018813, Mailed Date: Jan. 8, 2016, 4 Pages. |
Norway Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2016 in Appln No. 20054097, 1 pg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/981,404, filed Dec. 28, 2015 entitled “Command User Interface for Displaying Selectable Software Functionality Controls”. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,132, 149 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130159879 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12144642 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13769598 | US |