The present invention relates generally to an operating system for a truck mounted crane. More particularly, the present invention relates to a truck mounted crane operating system that de-rates the lifting capacity of the crane based on the rotational location of the boom.
Small cranes are commonly found on service trucks used by utility companies, construction companies, and tradesmen. These cranes can be used to lift any number of heavy objects in the field. When a lift is carried out, the operator does not know the weight of the object being lifted. Many times the operator's estimate of the objects weight can be off significantly. This can lead to the operator causing the crane to become unstable and possibly rolling the crane and truck. These cranes typically have a boom mounted to a rotatable base.
One of the most common hazards of operating a crane is lifting too large of a load. Often times it is not the actual weight of the load being lifted that causes accidents, it is that the load being lifted along the side of the truck. When this occurs, the truck becomes unstable. In extreme cases the truck can overturn.
While accidents like this occur regularly, prior attempts to implement safeguards have been limited to crane operating systems which monitor the weight of the load or hydraulic system pressure created by the load. This is a key variable in the problem. However, what begins as a lift, which is well within the capacity of the crane, can have devastating results when the load is moved alongside the truck. The same sized load may be safely lifted if it is towards the rear of the truck.
Therefore, what is needed is a crane operating system which prevents lifting dangerous loads alongside the truck.
Further, what is needed is a crane operating system which automatically prevents such dangerous lifts without additional input from the operator in normal operating mode.
The present invention achieves its objections by providing a crane control system and method which automatically de-rates the maximum capacity of the crane when the boom is located in a first zone located on one side of the truck or in a second zone located on the opposite side of the truck. The control system de-rates the crane without input from the crane operator. The control system uses an inductive proximity sensor located on the base of the crane to locate stationary steel targets located around the base of the crane. The targets approximate the outer ranges of the first and second zones.
The present invention prevents dangerous lifts alongside the truck. This reduces the likelihood of dangerous rollover accidents.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in further detail. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following detailed description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings (which are not to scale) where:
Turning now to the drawings, wherein like reference characters indicate like or similar parts throughout,
Because the wheel base 40 of a truck 24, i.e. the distance between the front axle 42 and the rear axle 44, is generally longer than the track 46 of the truck 24, i.e. the distance between the wheels 36 on the same axle 42 or 44, the risk of a rollover accident during a lift is more likely to occur on either side of the truck 24.
There is a first zone 48 on the first side 50 and a second zone 52 located on the second side 54 of the truck 24. As best seen in
According to the present invention, the crane controller 70 determines the rotational location of the boom 30. If the boom is located in either the first or second zones 48 and 52 the maximum lift capacity is reduced by a predetermined percentage. The reduction in maximum lift could be any number within the range of 10% to 50%. The amount of reduction is dependent upon the geometry of the truck 24 (such as wheel base 40, and track 46) and location of the crane 20 on the service body 22 or truck 24.
The amount of reduction of maximum lift is a predetermined amount set at the time the crane controller 70 is installed in the crane 20. Further, the de-rate occurs automatically by the crane controller 70 without any input from the crane operator.
The base 28 of the crane 20 may not be located on the center of 56 of the truck 24. Thus the crane 20 may be able to safely lift more weight on one side of the truck 24 than on the other side of the truck 24. Thus, the present invention may have embodiments where the amount of reduction of maximum capacity is different in the first zone 48 than it is in the second zone 52.
In comparing
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention shown in
In this example, the first and second zones 48 and 52 are combined with the no lift zone 68 over the cab 66. This means the maximum lift of the crane 20 is reduced from 225° to 135° about the center 56 of the truck 24. This translates into approximately 243° to 108° about the axis of rotation 62 of the crane 20.
As the boom 30 rotates about its axis of rotation, 30 the one or more targets 74 come into and out of range of the proximity sensor 72. The signal from the proximity sensor 72 is fed to the crane controller 70. The crane controller 70—which includes a microprocessor with computer executable instructions stored on non-transitory computer readable medium—can then determine whether the boom 30 is within the first or second zone 48 and 52 and whether the maximum capacity of the crane 20 should be reduced. If the boom 30 is within the first or second zone 48 or 52, the maximum capacity of the crane 20 is reduced by the predetermined percentage.
The foregoing description details certain preferred embodiments of the present invention and describes the best mode contemplated. It will be appreciated, however, that changes may be made in the details of construction and the configuration of components without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Therefore, the description provided herein is to be considered exemplary, rather than limiting, and the true scope of the invention is that defined by the following claims and the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/691,729 filed Apr. 21, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4063649 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4064997 | Holland et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4178591 | Geppert | Dec 1979 | A |
4216868 | Geppert | Aug 1980 | A |
5217126 | Hayashi | Jun 1993 | A |
5711440 | Wada | Jan 1998 | A |
5730305 | Ichiba | Mar 1998 | A |
5823370 | Ueda | Oct 1998 | A |
6208260 | West et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6894621 | Shaw | May 2005 | B2 |
8862337 | Peters et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20120065840 | Reeb | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130001183 | Wierzba et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013144 | Tanizumi | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140032060 | Zinke | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076836 | Qi et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140116975 | Benton | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4447393 | Jun 1996 | DE |
2493946 | Feb 2013 | GB |
20141388801 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Manitowac, “Manitowac, Model 22101s Product Guide, 2001”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14691729 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 16132581 | US |