This application claims priority to German Patent Application DE 102 53 231.1, entitled DECOMPRESSION LEVER UNIT, filed Nov. 15, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
A. Field of Invention
The invention pertains to an automatic decompression device for valve-controlled internal combustion engines.
B. Description of the Related Art
An automatic decompression device of this type is disclosed in DE 195 43 445 C1. For this purpose, attached in pivoting fashion on the camshaft is a decompression lever with its pivot axis arranged perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the camshaft. The decompression lever contains two lever arms, whereby the overall center of mass of the decompression lever is located on the axis of rotation or directly adjacent to it. The decompression lever is contacted by a spring element in such a way that below a certain rpm, the latter is held in a first switch position that acts in cooperation with the gas shuttle valve. In the first switch position, an automatic decompression is triggered by a corresponding actuation of the gas shuttle valve. Because of the centrifugal forces that are present, if a predetermined camshaft rpm is exceeded the decompression lever is pivoted against the spring force into a second switch position so that an effective connection no longer exists between the decompression lever and the gas shuttle valve, whereby the gas shuttle valve is now actuated solely by the action of the cam on the camshaft.
The invention permits the production of an automatic decompression device for valve-controlled internal combustion engines that is distinguished by a simple, lightweight design and is fastened or carried in such a way that cam and camshaft are not impaired in terms of their rigidity. In addition, the manufacturing process of the decompression device can be achieved in a few simple steps. By designing the decompression lever as a bow-shaped element that is carried on the camshaft at both ends of the bow, an automatic decompression arrangement is created, which, because of its lightweight construction and simple design, is especially suitable for small engines in which starting the engine primarily takes place by means of a pull-rope starter. Because of the lightweight design of the decompression bow element, which is made of spring steel wire, for example, no counterbalance weights are required on the decompression lever that are otherwise needed in order to place the overall center of mass of the decompression lever near the axis of rotation.
Additional advantages and advantageous developments of the invention are found in the subclaims and the description.
The extension required on the decompression lever to ensure that the tappet, which actuates the valve, is lifted in the base circle of the cam is simply configured as a bulge formed onto the bow element.
Attached to the camshaft to carry the bow element is a sleeve-like support element. The sleeve-like support element also seats the spring element that ensures that in a first switch position the decompression lever is pressed against the adjacent cam.
The support element contains two bore holes for seating the bow element. The support element also contains two guide grooves to guide each end of the bow element into the bore holes to ensure that the bow element is not deformed in the plastic region during assembly. Provided simultaneously on the support element are two elastic retaining pegs that together serve as a kind of locking hook for seating and securing the spring element, and, acting in cooperation with a leg of the spring element, as a moment support for the spring element.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the sleeve-like support element and the cam adjacent to the support element are designed as a one-piece plastic part that can be produced by means of injection molding.
An embodiment of the invention is explained in more detail in the following description and drawings.
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangement of parts, a preferred embodiment of which will be described in detail in this specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof and wherein:
Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating a preferred embodiment of the invention only and not for purposes of limiting the same. Referring to
Positioned adjacent to the cam 4 is a sleeve-like support element 9 whereby a decompression lever 10 is pivotally attached. The decompression lever is designed from steel spring wire and formed as a bow element 10 as shown in FIG. 6 and which when in a first position, as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Due to the rotation of the camshaft 5 when the internal combustion engine is in operation, centrifugal forces acting on the decompression lever 10 create on the decompression lever 10 a moment of torsion that is directed around the axis of rotation of the decompression lever 10 and that counteracts the force of the spring element 16. At a lower rpm (e.g., <600 rpm), the moment caused by the action of the spring element 16 is greater than the moment caused by the centrifugal forces, so that the decompression lever 10 is pressed into its first switch position as shown in FIG. 1. In this switch position, the decompression lever 10 acts, as previously indicated, together with the cup tappet 3. As the rpm of the camshaft 5 increases, the moment of torsion that is created by the centrifugal forces acting on the decompression lever 10 increases until it surpasses the moment of torsion caused by the action of the spring element 16. From this point on, the bow element 10 is pivoted, against the action of the spring element 16, away from the cam 4 and against a limit stop (not shown) so that the decompression is switched from on to off.
The suggested decompression arrangement is especially well-suited for small engines that are used, for example, in hand-operated lawn mowers or similar implements. If, for example, these engines are equipped with a pull-rope starter, the startup or starting operation can be made easier by the decompression arrangement.
The preferred embodiments have been described, hereinabove. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above methods may incorporate changes and modifications without departing from the general scope of this invention. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations in so far as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1377139 | Murphy | May 1921 | A |
2023048 | Gentili | Dec 1935 | A |
2742380 | Peters | Apr 1956 | A |
3314408 | Fenton | Apr 1967 | A |
3330263 | Weglage et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3343525 | Weglage et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3381676 | Campen | May 1968 | A |
3417740 | Perlewitz | Dec 1968 | A |
3538899 | Burkett | Nov 1970 | A |
3687124 | Kolorz | Aug 1972 | A |
3981289 | Harkness | Sep 1976 | A |
4084568 | Santo et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4184468 | Freyn | Jan 1980 | A |
4252092 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4312308 | Slattery | Jan 1982 | A |
4338893 | Pomfret et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4394851 | Greier et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4414933 | Pribnow | Nov 1983 | A |
4453507 | Braun et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4590905 | Matsuki et al. | May 1986 | A |
4610227 | Nakano et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4615312 | Tsumiyama | Oct 1986 | A |
4615313 | Tsumiyama | Oct 1986 | A |
4619228 | Liu | Oct 1986 | A |
4648362 | Kastlunger | Mar 1987 | A |
4672930 | Sumi | Jun 1987 | A |
4791892 | Hall | Dec 1988 | A |
4977868 | Holschuh | Dec 1990 | A |
4993372 | Mott et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5054441 | Nakatani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085184 | Yamada et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5116287 | Hironaka et al. | May 1992 | A |
5150674 | Gracyalny | Sep 1992 | A |
5184586 | Buchholz | Feb 1993 | A |
5197422 | Oleksy et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211140 | Hironaka et al. | May 1993 | A |
5301643 | Garcyalny | Apr 1994 | A |
5361738 | Iida | Nov 1994 | A |
5375570 | Swain | Dec 1994 | A |
5377642 | Morrow et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5379734 | Tsunoda et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5582143 | Stark et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5630385 | Taomo | May 1997 | A |
5632238 | Furukawa et al. | May 1997 | A |
5653199 | Ishiuchi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5687683 | Knoblauch | Nov 1997 | A |
5701860 | Horiuchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5799635 | Aljabari | Sep 1998 | A |
5809958 | Gracyalny | Sep 1998 | A |
5816208 | Kimura | Oct 1998 | A |
5823153 | Santi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5904124 | Poehlman et al. | May 1999 | A |
6055952 | Gau | May 2000 | A |
6073599 | Kimura | Jun 2000 | A |
6223708 | Kampichler et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240888 | Pilney | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250271 | Ikuma et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253723 | Edlund et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269786 | Snyder et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343579 | Yasuyama et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374792 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386168 | Suzuki et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6394054 | Rado et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6439187 | Dietz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454037 | Atsuumi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494175 | Gracyalny | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6531927 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536393 | Novak et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539906 | Rado et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543403 | Kawamoto | Apr 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 43 445 | Feb 1997 | DE |
1 186 754 | Mar 2002 | EP |
0 954 683 | Apr 2002 | EP |
11-294130 | Oct 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040094110 A1 | May 2004 | US |