Mobile devices, such as mobile telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), portable (e.g., laptop) computers, and paging devices, have become ubiquitous in the world today. In our fast-paced society, we rely on such devices to give us greater flexibility in our daily lives, for business, family, and pleasure. With the proliferation of mobile network devices has come a proliferation of mobile wireless networks.
Many wireless networks may interface with fixed (wired) networks via access points (APs) that are root units (RUs). The RUs may generally be wired into the fixed networks and may communicate via wireless means with other elements of a wireless network. However, in general, an RU may only be able to be communicate with wireless network elements within its own signaling range.
The signaling range of an RU may be improved via the use of one or more APs that serve as RU range extenders (REs), which may communicate with at least one other AP (RU or other RE) and with other wireless network elements. An RE may act to relay communications between an AP and another wireless network element. A problem with the use of REs, however, is that they may result in a need for networks using them to be manually configured (that is, their topologies may need to be manually determined).
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in connection with the associated drawings, in which:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures, and/or techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure an understanding of this description.
References to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “example embodiment”, “various embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment(s) of the invention so described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but not every embodiment necessarily includes the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Further, repeated use of the phrase “in one embodiment” does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, although it may.
In the following description and claims, the terms “connected” and “coupled,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. In contrast, “coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other or that the two or more elements are not in direct contact but still cooperate or interact with each other.
An algorithm is here, and generally, considered to be a self-consistent sequence of acts or operations leading to a desired result. These include physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers or the like. It should be understood, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
In a similar manner, the term “processor” may refer to any device or portion of a device that processes electronic data from registers and/or memory to transform that electronic data into other electronic data that may be stored in registers and/or memory. A “computing platform” may comprise one or more processors.
Embodiments of the present invention may include apparatuses for performing the operations herein. An apparatus may be specially constructed for the desired purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose device selectively activated or reconfigured by a program stored in the device.
Embodiments of the invention may be implemented in one or a combination of hardware, firmware, and software. Embodiments of the invention may also be implemented as instructions stored on a machine-readable medium, which may be read and executed by a computing platform to perform the operations described herein. A machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). For example, a machine-readable medium may include read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.), and others.
The system may include among its wireless network elements REs, e.g., 14-16, and/or wireless stations, e.g., 13, 17, 18. Wireless stations 13, 17, 18 may include, but are not limited to, mobile telephones, mobile radios, portable computers, PDAs, paging devices, etc., and they may or may not be mobile.
The process described in connection with the state diagram of
If the predetermined period has expired, block 43, then the process may continue to block 44 to determine if at least one beacon frame corresponding to at least one AP has been detected. If not, the process may loop back to block 42 to perform further detection. If at least one AP has been detected, the process may continue to block 45.
In block 45, the RE may decide among detected APs, as discussed above in connection with
In the case of a wireless station, the process of auto detection and configuration may be considered to be complete. In this case, as will be discussed in greater detail below in connection with an RE, the wireless station may remain associated with the chosen AP for as long as it continues to detect beacon frames. If no beacon frame is detected from the chosen AP for more than some predetermined time period, the wireless station may then disassociate itself from the chosen AP and may go back to block 42 and commence auto detection.
In the case of an RE, on the other hand, the process may continue with block 46. In block 46, the RE may begin transmitting its own beacon frame. In such a case, the RE may increment the number of hops in its own transmitted beacon frame, in comparison with the beacon frame received from the chosen AP. That is, if the chosen AP was n hops from an RU, the RE may transmit a beacon that indicates it is n+1 hops from an RU.
The RE may also form communication links with other wireless network elements (e.g., other REs and/or wireless stations) that may detect the RE and may seek to establish links with the RE as their AP.
Additionally, the RE may start an AP beacon timer. The chosen AP may continue to transmit its beacon frame, and the RE may continue to detect it. By so doing, the RE may ensure that the chosen AP is still available and that its communication link with the AP may continue to be maintained. The AP beacon timer may provide a “time-out” period during which, if a beacon frame is not received from the chosen AP, the RE may determine that the chosen AP has become unavailable, block 47. On the other hand, whenever a beacon frame is received from the chosen AP, the AP beacon timer may be reset, and a new period may begin.
If the AP beacon timer times out, block 47, the process may continue to block 48. In block 48, the RE may cease transmitting its beacon frame, e.g., to reflect the fact that it may no longer be an AP for the network. Accordingly, the RE may de-authenticate any wireless network elements that have established connections to the RE as an AP. The process may then loop back to block 42, and the RE may then re-commence auto detection.
As discussed above, embodiments of the invention may utilize a beacon frame containing certain information. An exemplary implementation of such a beacon frame is shown in
Some embodiments of the invention, as discussed above, may be embodied in the form of software instructions on a machine-readable medium. Such an embodiment is illustrated in
The invention has been described in detail with respect to various embodiments, and it will now be apparent from the foregoing to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects. The invention, therefore, as defined in the appended claims, is intended to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/747,067 filed Dec. 30, 2003, and claims priority to that filing date.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10747067 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 12462214 | US |