Automatic document feeder hopper flag force control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6260841
  • Patent Number
    6,260,841
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 20, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 17, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A document feeder includes a nudger located at a first side of a document stack. The nudger applies a nudger force to the first side of the document stack. An adjustable hopper positions the document stack next to the nudger. The adjustable hopper has a hopper floor that is an inclined plane supporting a flag. The flag adjustably rests against a side of the document stack opposite the nudger and applies a variable flag force to the document stack. The flag force changes according to the incline angle of the hopper floor. The flag has a weight, and as the incline of the hopper floor increases, the flag applies an increasing force caused by the weight to the document stack. The flag force is transmitted through the document stack. The document stack applies a force to the nudger and the nudger applies a reactionary force normal to the nudger. A feedback control is coupled between the nudger and adjustable hopper so that the nudger force can be changed by adjusting the incline of the hopper floor.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to a system for providing a consistent force between a nudger and documents fed from a stack. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a system for compensating for variability in a nudger normal force resulting from variations in the number of documents in the stack, the weight of the documents in the stack, and the friction forces between the stack of documents and the hopper floors and walls.




2. Description of Related Art




A variety of automated machines such as document sorters, mail sorters, copiers, page feeders, punch card readers, automatic teller machines and fax machines utilize document feeders to move documents within a machine. Documents in a machine are often stacked and automatically fed from the document stack. A nudger moves the documents a short distance from the leading edge guide to the nip formed by the feed wheel and the separator belt. In the process of successively feeding documents from the stack, a nudger applies a force to a first document, while a flag applies a force to a last document. The flag force is transmitted through the document stack to the nudger, and the nudger, in response, applies a reactionary force normal to the document stack. The nudger, therefore, applies a force which is not only the tangential force caused by the rotation of the nudger about a fixed shaft, but also the reactionary force of the nudger applied in a direction normal to the flag. Commonly known systems for applying the flag force are springs, weights attached to cables and pulleys, incline planes, and motor-driven flags.




A great variety of document friction conditions exist in various applications, such as check processing, mail sorters, punch card readers, automatic teller machines and fax machines. Documents moving against the hopper floor can produce different variations in friction forces. These friction forces generated from the movement of the document stack subtract from the flag force applied to the document stack, thus the force transmitted through the document stack to the nudger is less than the flag force and therefore causes changes in the reactionary force the nudger normally applies to the document stack. A feedback control is required between the flag and nudger to maintain a consistent nudger force that does not vary in response to conditions in the document stack. If the nudger force is too large, the nudger moves multiple documents through the nip, and thus cause multiple feeds. If the nudger force is too low, however, the nudger fails to move documents to the nip, thus the documents do not feed through the nip. There is a need to measure the normal force at the nudger, and depending on this measurement, adjust the flag force to produce a desired nudger force.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a flag force control system includes a flag which applies a flag force to a side of a document stack opposite the nudger. The flag cooperates with the nudger to force the document stack against the nudger. An adjustable hopper for positioning the document stack next to the nudger includes an adjustable hopper floor which supports a flag. A feedback control is coupled between the nudger and the flag. The feedback control adjusts the nudger force by changing the incline of the adjustable hopper floor.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a top view of a document feeder; and





FIG. 2

is a side view showing the preferred embodiment of an automatic hopper flag force control arranged in accordance with the principles of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT





FIG. 1

shows a document feeder


10


. Document feeder


10


has a document leading edge guide wall


14


to support the documents, and a hopper flag


16


to apply a force to a side of a document stack


18


opposite the side of the document stack


18


in contact with nudger


20


. A reaction force, normal to the nudger, develops in response to the flag force at the opposite end of document stack


18


where nudger


20


contacts document stack


18


. Nudger


20


, feeder tire


22


and separator


24


are rotating as a flag pushes document stack


18


along leading edge guide


14


, toward nudger


20


.




Nudger


20


controls movement of preferably a first document


26


through the feeder/separator nip


28


. Nudger


20


and feed tire


22


accelerate first document


26


. Nudger


20


moves first document


26


a distance from the leading edge guide


14


to the feeder/separator nip


28


formed by feed tire


22


and separator


24


. First document


26


feeds because the friction between the feed tire


22


and first document


26


is greater than the friction between the first document


26


and next document


30


. The next document


30


will be held back and not feed as long as the friction between the separator


24


and the next document


30


is greater than the friction between the first document


26


and the next document


30


. A nudger force that is too large will push the document through the feed wheel prematurely. Additionally, a nudger force that is too large may cause a document to buckle as it slides on the next document that is waiting for the first document to leave the feeder/separator nip


28


. A nudger force that is too low, however, may be unable to move the first document to the feeder/separator nip


28


, and thus slip so that no feeding occurs.




In the preferred embodiment, feed tire


22


rotates with feed wheel


32


. Separator


24


is supported by arm


34


, idler pulleys


36


, and separator belt drive pulley


38


. Separator


24


is preferably a rotatable belt.




Nudger


20


can be independently driven by a motor drive, preferably a DC servomotor with appropriate feedback controls, a stepper motor, or fast accelerating/decelerating motor. A clutch/brake may also vary the acceleration of nudger


20


.





FIG. 2

shows an automatic hopper flag force control


50


. The nudger


20


is connected to a feedback control


58


. Feedback control


58


measures the nudger force which is the force normal to the axis about which nudger


20


rotates, and provides a feedback control signal indicating the difference between the measured nudger force and a reference force which are both provided as signals to the feedback control


58


. The reference force is a value desired for the nudger force. The feedback control signal indicates the amount in which the nudger force should be increased or decreased to attain the desired force for the nudger. A drive device


82


is coupled between the feedback control


58


and the adjustable hopper


84


. The drive device


82


changes the position of the hopper floor according to the feedback control signal.




A nudger


20


adjustably rests against a first end of the document stack


18


. A flag


14


adjustably rests against a second end of the document stack


18


. The document stack


18


and flag


14


are supported by the adjustable hopper


84


. In the preferred embodiment, the adjustable hopper


84


includes a hopper floor


80


supported by a pivot


78


on a first end. Hopper floor


80


rotates about pivot


78


. The flag has a weight that produces a horizontal force against the document stick


18


. A change in the incline of the hopper floor


80


changes the horizontal force of the flag


14


applied to document stack


18


. The flag


14


preferably has rotational apparatus


86


which permits the flag to move along the hopper floor


80


. The horizontal force increases with increasing vertical incline of the hopper floor


80


, and decreases with decreasing vertical incline of the hopper floor


80


.




In the preferred embodiment, the nudger


20


is rotatably supported on a fixed shaft


54


. Bearings


52


are preferably located between nudger


20


and shaft


54


. Nudger


20


rotates about shaft


54


, and therefore applies a tangential force to the first end of the document stack


18


. The nudger


20


also applies a nudger force to the first end of the document stack


18


. The nudger force is a reactionary force applied in a direction normal to the axis of rotation of nudger


20


. The flag force applies a force to the second end of the document stack


18


causing document stack


18


to apply a force to the nudger


20


, thus the nudger applies a nudger force to the document stack


18


. The force applied by the document stack


18


to the nudger also bends the shaft


54


. This bending of the shaft


54


causes strain in the shaft


54


. This strain represents the nudger force.




The feedback control


58


is coupled to the nudger


20


. The feedback control


58


obtains a measurement of the nudger force, compares the nudger force to a reference force, and provides a feedback signal representing the change in the nudger force that is needed to obtain the desired nudger force. In the preferred embodiment, the force measurer


56


is a strain gage and is connected to shaft


54


. The stain gage measures the strain in the shaft by well-known methods, and provides an electrical signal representing the nudger force. Signal conditioning electronics


60


are connected to the strain gage and convert the resistance change in the strain gage


56


to a voltage. A comparator


62


is connected to signal conditioning electronics


60


. Comparator


62


compares the voltage representing the nudger force to a voltage representing the reference force


61


and produces a feedback control signal. The feedback control signal is provided to the drive device


82


.




Drive device


82


is coupled between the feedback control


58


and the adjustable hopper


84


. In the preferred embodiment, drive device


82


includes a motor controller


64


that drives amplifier


66


. Amplifier


66


uses the signal of motor controller


64


to actuate a motor


68


. Motor


68


drives a cam


72


that is attached to motor shaft


70


. The cam


72


supports a cam roller


74


that is attached to a hopper floor


80


. The cam roller


74


causes a change in the position of the incline of the hopper floor. Other drive devices that can be used to change the position of the adjustable hopper include, but are not limited to, a hydraulic cylinder or piston.




If the measured voltage of the strain gage


54


is greater than the voltage representing the desired nudger force, then the drive device will cause a decrease in the incline of the hopper floor


80


. If the measured voltage of the strain gage


54


is less than the voltage representing the desired nudger force, then the drive device will cause an increase in the incline of the hopper floor


80


. If the measured voltage of strain gage


56


is equal to the voltage representing the desired nudger force, then the motor will turn off. The nudger force can therefore be maintained at the desired force, independently of variations in the document hopper friction forces, or the number of documents in the hopper.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for controlling the nudger force applied to a nudger in a document feeder comprising:an adjustable flag for applying a force to a side of the document stack opposite the nudger, the flag cooperating with the nudger to force the document stack against the nudger; a hopper for positioning the document stack next to the nudger, the hopper having an adjustable hopper floor supporting the flag; and a feedback control apparatus coupled between the nudger and the flag for adjusting the hopper floor to vary the nudger force.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the feedback control apparatus further includes:a force measurer coupled to the nudger for generating a measured signal representing the nudger force; and a comparator coupled between the force measurer and the adjustable hopper floor, the comparator providing a feedback control signal based on a difference between the signal representing the nudger force and a reference force.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the nudger is rotationally supported on a fixed shaft and the force measurer comprises a strain gage.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2 further including a signal conditioner coupled between the force measurer and the comparator, the signal conditioner for conditioning the measured signal for use with the comparator.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the adjustable hopper floor further includes a drive device coupled between the feedback control apparatus and the adjustable hopper floor, the drive device for changing an incline of the hopper floor as a function of a control signal generated by the feedback control apparatus.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the drive device includes a motor controller coupled between the comparator and the drive device, the motor controller for providing the control signal to the drive device.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the drive device comprises a motor and further includes an amplifier coupled between the motor controller and motor.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the drive device further includes:a motor; a cam connected to the motor; and a cam roller connected to the hopper floor, the cam roller for translating the motion of the cam to the hopper floor.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the flag is supported by rotational apparatus for providing movement of the flag along the hopper floor.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the hopper floor is supported by a pivot.
  • 11. An apparatus for controlling force of a nudger against a document stack comprising:a hopper having an adjustable hopper floor; a flag resting on the hopper floor for exerting a flag force upon an end of the document stack opposite the nudger; a force measurer coupled to the nudger for generating a signal representing the nudger force; a comparator coupled to the force measurer, the comparator for generating a feedback control signal based on a comparison between the generated signal and a reference signal representing a desired force of the nudger; and a drive device coupled between the comparator and the adjustable hopper floor, the drive device operative to change a position of the adjustable hopper floor based on the feedback control signal.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the drive device further includes:a motor controller connected to the comparator; a motor connected to the motor controller; a cam connected to the motor; and a cam roller fixably connected to the hopper floor, the cam roller for translating the motion of the cam to the hopper.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
4566685 Irvine et al. Jan 1986
4723773 Westover et al. Feb 1988
5971391 Salomon et al. Oct 1999
6032946 Marshall et al. Mar 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2037261 Jul 1980 GB