This application is a 371 of PCT/EP2017/081436 filed on Dec. 5, 2017, published on Jun. 14, 2018 under publication number WO 2018/104258, which claims priority benefits from Swedish Patent Application No. 1630292-9 filed on Dec. 7, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the technical field of motorized doors. More specifically, the present invention relates to an automatic door operator for a swing door assembly having a door leaf rotationally supported by a door frame. The present invention also relates to a door operating system comprising such an automatic door operator, and to a method for providing user interaction with an automatic door operator in a door operating system.
Automatic door operators are frequently used for providing automatic opening and sometimes closing of one or more door leaves of a swing door assembly, in order to facilitate entrance and exit to buildings, rooms and other areas.
Since automatic door operators are typically used in public areas, it may be desired to allow a clean and aesthetically appealing installation where separate buttons, actuators, etc, as well as the wiring thereof to the automatic door operator, be avoided. This may also be beneficial for cost-saving reasons (less components) as well as safety reasons (no external components exposed to wear and tear).
On the other hand, there are situations where it is desired to allow a human user to interact with the automatic door operator in order to control a function thereof.
Accordingly, there are rooms for improvements in the situations referred to above.
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a solution to or at least a mitigation of one or more of the problems or drawbacks identified in the background section above.
The present inventors have realized, after insightful consideration, that human interaction with automatic door operators may be provided in a novel and inventive way, which avoids the drawbacks above. By appropriately configuring a controller in the automatic door operator, intentional manual movements of the door leaf in certain situations may be detected and used as commands for controlling one or more of the functions of the automatic door operator.
The present inventors have furthermore realized that there might in fact be a number of different functions of automatic door operators which can be controlled in a number of given situations in this novel and inventive way.
A first aspect of the present invention is an automatic door operator for a swing door assembly having a door leaf rotationally supported by a door frame. The automatic door operator comprises a motor for causing opening of the door leaf with respect to the door frame, and a controller being configured for performing different functions of the automatic door operator. The controller is configured to: detect a movement of the door leaf, not caused by said motor; identify a predefined movement matching the detected movement; determine, among said different functions, a function being associated with the predefined movement; and cause performance of the determined function.
The purpose of the detection of the movement is to allow that an intentional manual movement of the door leaf in a certain situation can be used for controlling one or more of the functions of the automatic door operator. The predefined movement therefore preferably represents an intentional manual movement of the door leaf by human intervention. This approach solves or at least mitigates one or more of the problems or drawbacks identified in the background section above, as will be clear from the following detailed description section.
An automatic door operator according to this aspect of the present invention solves or at least mitigates one or more of the problems or drawbacks identified in the background section above.
A second aspect of the present invention is a door operating system, comprising an automatic door operator according to the first aspect, a door frame, a swing door assembly having a door leaf rotationally supported by the door frame, and a linkage mechanism connecting the automatic door operator to the door leaf.
A third aspect of the present invention is a method for providing user interaction with an automatic door operator in a door operating system which furthermore comprises a door frame, a swing door assembly having a door leaf rotationally supported by the door frame, and a linkage mechanism connecting the automatic door operator to the door leaf. The method comprises: detecting a movement of the door leaf, not caused by a motor of said automatic door operator; identifying a predefined movement matching the detected movement; determining, among different functions of the automatic door operator, a function being associated with the predefined movement; and causing performance of the determined function.
Embodiments of the invention are defined by the appended dependent claims and are further explained in the detailed description section as well as on the drawings.
It should be emphasized that the term “comprises/comprising” when used in this specification is taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, or components, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components, or groups thereof. All terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to “a/an/the [element, device, component, means, step, etc]” are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of the element, device, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.
Objects, features and advantages of embodiments of the invention will appear from the following detailed description, reference being made to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the particular embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements.
The door leaf 14 may be a door design made from one or more suitable materials such as wood, metal, plastic, glass or composite material. In some embodiments, the door leaf 14 is a fire proof door leaf having a fire resistant core made of various materials, as is generally well known in the art. Fire doors are arranged to stop or delay the transfer of thermal energy, i.e. heat, from one side of the door to another side.
In the disclosed embodiment, the swing door assembly 10 comprises a single door leaf 14. In other embodiments, the swing door assembly 10 may instead comprise a pair of door leaves, as is generally well known in the art.
The door operating system 1 also includes an automatic door operator 30 and a linkage mechanism 20 connecting the automatic door operator 30 to the door leaf 14. The door operator 30 may be arranged in conjunction with the door frame 12, typically as a concealed overhead installation in or at the door frame 12.
Via the linkage mechanism 20, the automatic door operator 30 may serve to provide automatic opening and sometimes closing of the door leaf 14 in various possible applications including, for instance, facilitating a disabled person's access to his or her private home, providing access through entrance ports or internal doors at office premises, industries or retail stores, providing comfort access to hotel rooms, etc. The automatic door operator 30 may also be used in different fire door applications.
A first embodiment of the automatic door operator 30 is shown in
The automatic door operator 30 also comprises a controller 31 which is configured for performing different functions of the automatic door operator 30. Such different functions are schematically illustrated at 60 in
A revolution counter 33, such as an encoder or other angular sensor, is provided at the motor 34 to monitor the revolution of a motor shaft of the motor 34. The revolution counter is connected to an input 31b of the controller 31. The controller 31 is configured to use one or more readings of the revolution counter 33 for determining a current angular position of the door leaf 14.
The controller 31 may be implemented in any known controller technology, including but not limited to microcontroller, processor (e.g. PLC, CPU, DSP), FPGA, ASIC or any other suitable digital and/or analog circuitry capable of performing the intended functionality.
The controller 31 has an associated memory 32. The memory 32 may be implemented in any known memory technology, including but not limited to E(E)PROM, S(D)RAM or flash memory. In some embodiment, the memory 32 may be integrated with or internal to the controller 31. The memory 32 may store program instruction for execution by the controller 31, as well as temporary and permanent data used by the controller 31.
A second embodiment of the automatic door operator 30 is shown in
In the disclosed embodiment, the forced close arrangement 36 comprises a helical compression spring. During opening of the door, the compression spring is tensioned by the rotation of the output shaft 35a. During the forced closing cycle, the accumulated spring force is transferred to the output shaft 35 by means of the transfer mechanism 37 which in the disclosed embodiment includes a pressure roller that acts on a cam curve being connected to the output shaft 35a. In other embodiments, the forced close arrangement 36 may comprise a different kind of spring, and the transfer mechanism 37 may comprise a different kind of mechanism.
The controller 31 may receive an external fire alarm signal via a control input 31d and generate a control signal 36a to the forced close arrangement 36, so as to cause release of the accumulated spring force.
Embodiments of the novel and inventive way of providing human interaction with the automatic door operator 30 will now be described with reference to the remaining figures. As will be clear from the following, the controller 31 in the automatic door operator 30 is configured to detect intentional manual movements of the door leaf 14 in certain given situations, and to use such detected movements as commands for controlling one or more of the functions 60 of the automatic door operator 30. Corresponding methods are described in
First, as seen in
In addition, a second group of functions 61-A, 61-B, . . . , is provided (the group may consist of an arbitrary number of functions including a single function). According to the invention, the functions 61-A, 61-B, . . . comprise respective commands 62-A, 62-B, . . . for initiating, modifying or aborting respective functions 61-n, 61-1 of the first group of functions 61-1, 61-2, . . . , 61-n of the automatic door operator performable by the controller 31. Examples will be given later with reference to
Reference is now made to
In step 42 in
The controller 31 is configured to use one or more readings of the revolution counter 33 for determining a current angular position of the door leaf 14. The controller 31 is configured to use the determined current angular position for detecting the movement of the door leaf 14. For embodiments like in
In step 44 in
In step 46 in
In step 48 in
For instance, in the example given in
Reference is now made to
In addition, according to the method of
The value of tmin may be set to an appropriate value, such as for instance n seconds, where 1.0≤n≤5.0. In the embodiments described below for
A number of use cases will now be described with reference to
Use Case 1—Aborting Hold Open
In this use case, one of the functions in the first group of functions 61-1, 61-2, . . . , 61-n in
However, in other situations, the hold open might potentially be very inconvenient when, for instance, the automatic door opener is used in a restroom or hotel room. The inconvenience is since the door is kept open for seconds after the user has passed, the integrity of the user may be compromised by the external visibility into the room through an open door, or the opportunity for a trespasser to sneak into the room through the still open door.
Thanks to the present invention, a physical push or pull of the door towards the closed position by a number of degrees will in effect cancel this time delay. There is no need to install a separate push button or off switch to achieve such cancellation of the automatic hold open function. The present inventors have realized that the natural response for a person who is intimidated by an undesired hold open period will be to try and close the door by physically pulling or pushing it towards the closed position. Hence, the use case is believed to be advantageous also in the sense that the user will quite possibly need no prior knowledge on how to operate the door in order to abort the hold open period.
The use case above is seen at a schematic level in
The controller 31 detects the intentional movement 19a, finds that it matches the predefined movement, determines that the predefined movement is associated with a function (among functions 61-A and 61-B in
Use Case 2—Manual Hold Open
Also in this use case, the different functions 60 of the automatic door operator performable by the controller 31 include an automatic hold open function to keep the door leaf 14 open during an automatic hold open period. However, the determined function in this use case is instead to initiate the automatic hold open function when the door leaf is initially in a closed position. This use case is illustrated in
In this use case, the defined door leaf angle β in the definition of the predefined movement is β′ degrees more than the reference door leaf angle of the door leaf 14 in the open position γ. The predefined movement is hence defined as a movement of the door leaf 14 from the closed position δ towards and β′ degrees past the open position γ. The value β′ of the defined door leaf angle β may be a preset suitable value, such as for instance any value between 0.1 degrees and 10 degrees, and may optionally be configurable. In some embodiments, the value is preferably between 0.5 degrees and 1 degree. Other values, even larger than 10 degrees, are however also possible.
The controller 31 detects an intentional movement 19b, finds that it matches the predefined movement, determines that the predefined movement is associated with a function (among functions 61-A and 61-B in
Use Case 3—Generate Fire Alarm
This use case is particularly suitable for the fire door embodiment of
Accordingly, similar to the aforementioned
The controller 31 detects the intentional movement 19a, finds that it matches the predefined movement, determines that the predefined movement is associated with a function (among functions 61-A and 61-B in
Use Case 4—Reset after Fire Alarm
Also in this use case, the different functions 60 of the automatic door operator 30 performable by the controller 31 include generation of a fire alarm. However, in this use case, the determined function is instead to reset the automatic door operator 30 after a fire alarm has been generated.
In this use case, similar to the aforementioned
The controller 31 detects an intentional movement 19b, finds that it matches the predefined movement, determines that the predefined movement is associated with a function (among functions 61-A and 61-B in
The invention has been described above in detail with reference to embodiments thereof. However, as is readily understood by those skilled in the art, other embodiments are equally possible within the scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1630292-9 | Dec 2016 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/081436 | 12/5/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/104258 | 6/14/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3777423 | Coulter | Dec 1973 | A |
3905063 | Coulter | Sep 1975 | A |
3908309 | Coulter | Sep 1975 | A |
3926461 | D'Hooge | Dec 1975 | A |
3934306 | Farris | Jan 1976 | A |
4501090 | Yoshida | Feb 1985 | A |
4952080 | Boiucaner | Aug 1990 | A |
5018304 | Longoria | May 1991 | A |
5878530 | Eccleston | Mar 1999 | A |
6283189 | Liebscher | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6891479 | Eccleston | May 2005 | B1 |
7310911 | Sellman | Dec 2007 | B1 |
8225458 | Hoffberg | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8527101 | Burris | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8773237 | Burris | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9995076 | Hoffberg | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10648208 | Eickhoff | May 2020 | B2 |
20020104266 | Ranaudo | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040183677 | Fitzgibbon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050091928 | Okulov | May 2005 | A1 |
20070108927 | Valencia | May 2007 | A1 |
20070277440 | Luetkenhaus | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090249699 | Yulkowski | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265992 | Hass | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100115853 | Gebhart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20120240474 | Purssey | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20200300026 | Lawhon | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3612918 | Oct 1987 | DE |
102015104825 | Jul 2016 | DE |
20110001581 | Jan 2011 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in PCT/EP2017/060488 dated Mar. 12, 2018. |
SE International-Type Search Report mailed in SE 1630292-9 dated Aug. 30, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190292835 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |