Automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10164928
  • Patent Number
    10,164,928
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 11, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 25, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatuses for automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks. A composition interface in which a user can compose an electronic mail message is provided. A mechanism within the composition interface to select a response window is provided. A follow-up task corresponding to the electronic mail message for the user is generated only if a response to the electronic mail message is not received within the response window.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments relate to automatic conditional task assignments. More particularly, embodiments relate to techniques for automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks.


BACKGROUND

It is increasingly common for a majority of communications to be conducted via electronic mail. People who manage a relatively large number of tasks or projects via email (e.g., salespeople, managers, teachers, insurance professionals) may find it difficult to consistently follow-up on items when the recipient of an email does not respond.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.



FIG. 1 is an illustration of one embodiment of a browser accessing email functionality with a sidebar to provide information related to one or more recipients of an email message and further supporting automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow up tasks.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of one embodiment of an electronic mail message composition interface in which automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks can be enabled.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of an electronic system.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a technique for supporting dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a conditional follow-up agent.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.


In one embodiment, during email composition (or other communication flow), a user is given the option that if a current recipient has not replied in a specified time, a follow up task is automatically created and assigned to the user. If, before that specified due date, the recipient (or any recipients on the To/CC line, if multiple) has responded to the user, the follow up is not created. In one embodiment, the generated follow up can be associated to the particular email message on which the follow up was scheduled. The generated follow up can provide a message button, which brings up the sent email message and brings context to user right away.


In one embodiment, a recommendation can be made to a user to create a follow-up based on the content of the communication. In one embodiment, this functionality can be provided as a browser extension. For example, natural language features such as questions, inquiries (e.g., “?”, “Can you . . . ”, “Let me know . . . ”) can trigger a suggestion for an automatic follow up task if no response is received. These features can be hard coded and/or can be generated through machine learning techniques.



FIG. 1 is an illustration of one embodiment of a browser accessing email functionality with a sidebar to provide information related to one or more recipients of an email message and further supporting automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow up tasks. In one embodiment, the dynamically presented contextual information is presented as sidebar 100 (illustrated on the right side of a graphical user interface). However, presentation of this information is not limited to a sidebar (or even a bar-type window/graphic). Various features and elements of sidebar 100 are described in greater detail below.


In one embodiment, sidebar 100 is provided by a browser (e.g., Internet Explorer®, Chrome®, Safari®, Firefox®) extension. Generally speaking, a browser extension is a computer program that extends the functionality of a browser in some way. Depending on the browser and the version, the term may be distinct from similar terms such as plug-in or add-on. Some extensions are authored using web technologies such as HTML, JavaScript, and CSS. Browser extensions can change the user interface of the web browser without directly affecting viewable content of a web page, for example, by adding sidebar 100.


In one embodiment, sidebar 100 is provided when a user utilizes browser 120 to access an email application/site (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo! Mail, Hotmail, iCloud). In the example of FIG. 1, navigation panel 130 allows the user to create/compose, edit, send, save, delete, organize various email messages in the normal manner provided by the email application/site. In one embodiment, the email functionality is provided by the email application/site in the same manner as where conditional follow up tasks are not generated.


While most of the examples herein are for a browser based embodiment, non-browser embodiments can be supported as well. For example, dynamically created follow up functionality can be provided for a user that is composing email in an email application (e.g., Mac Mail). In one embodiment, when a user provides a recipient (e.g., 150), sidebar 100 provides information corresponding to that recipient. Multiple recipients (140) can be included in an email message.


In one embodiment, sidebar provides information relating to recipient 150 from internal data sources (e.g., CRM database, HR profile, contacts database/application) and/or from external data sources (e.g., social media sites, professional networks, news sites, third-party information gathering services, Internet searches).


In one embodiment, the email composition interface further includes follow-up bar 160, which allows a user to enable automatic generation of a follow-up task. In one embodiment, when an email message is sent, the extension checks to determine whether automatic generation of follow-ups has been enabled. If so, the system checks to determine whether the email has been sent before proceeding with the enablement of the automatic generation of a follow-up task.


In one embodiment, the system (e.g., via a backend database) keeps a listing of email messages (or other types of communication/actions that are tracked—instant messages, text messages, audio messages) and when the response window has closed, the system checks to determine if a reply to the email message (or other communication) has been received. In one embodiment, the system (e.g., via the backend database) periodically sweeps through the pending (e.g., non-expired, non-response) scheduled follow-ups and checks to determine if a reply to the original message has been received. If a reply has been received, no follow-up task is generated. If a reply has not been received, a follow-up task can be generated.


The follow-up task can be assigned via the email application/site, via a CRM or other on-demand services environment, or in any other way. In one embodiment, the follow up, if generated, has the same functionality as a manually created follow up. In one embodiment, the generated follow up can be 1) associated to a CRM relationship, 2) assigned to others, and/or 3) modified across CRM (or other application type) clients (e.g., browser extension, web app, mobile apps).


In an alternate embodiment, pixel tracking and/or link tracking can be utilized to determine whether to automatically generate a follow-up task. For example, a follow-up task may not be generated unless the recipient has opened the message, or a follow-up task may not be generated unless the recipient has accessed a link embedded in the message.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of one embodiment of an electronic mail message composition interface in which automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks can be enabled. In one embodiment, automatic generation of conditional follow-up tasks can be enabled and/or controlled via an additional element in an electronic mail composition interface, for example, as a bar on the bottom of the window, or as a drop-down menu, or as a dialog box, etc. In the example of FIG. 2, when a user opens a window 200 to create a new message, the controls for automatic generation of one or more conditional follow-up tasks can be included as a bar at the bottom (or top, or side) of the new message.


In one embodiment, the user is given check box 210, 220 (or other mechanism) to enable automatic generation of conditional follow-up tasks. In one embodiment, the user is allowed to select a response window via menu 230. In one embodiment, clicking on menu 230 provides calendar 240, which can allow the user to select from pre-defined follow-up times (e.g., today, tomorrow, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks) or to select a custom response window (e.g., by using calendar 240 and calendar navigation tools). The dynamically assigned conditional follow-up task can then be assigned if no reply is received within the window defined using the mechanisms of FIG. 2.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of an electronic system. The electronic system illustrated in FIG. 3 is intended to represent a range of electronic systems (either wired or wireless) including, for example, desktop computer systems, laptop computer systems, cellular telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs) including cellular-enabled PDAs, set top boxes, tablets, etc. Alternative electronic systems may include more, fewer and/or different components.


Electronic system 300 includes bus 305 or other communication device to communicate information, and processor 310 coupled to bus 305 that may process information. While electronic system 300 is illustrated with a single processor, electronic system 300 may include multiple processors and/or co-processors. Electronic system 300 further may include random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device 320 (referred to as main memory), coupled to bus 305 and may store information and instructions that may be executed by processor 310. Main memory 320 may also be used to store temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 310.


Electronic system 300 may also include read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 330 coupled to bus 305 that may store static information and instructions for processor 310. Data storage device 340 may be coupled to bus 305 to store information and instructions. Data storage device 340 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and corresponding drive may be coupled to electronic system 300.


Electronic system 300 may also be coupled via bus 305 to display device 350, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or liquid crystal display (LCD), to display information to a user. Alphanumeric input device 360, including alphanumeric and other keys, may be coupled to bus 305 to communicate information and command selections to processor 310. Another type of user input device is cursor control 370, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys to communicate direction information and command selections to processor 310 and to control cursor movement on display 350.


Electronic system 300 further may include network interface(s) 380 to provide access to a network, such as a local area network. Network interface(s) 380 may include, for example, a wireless network interface having antenna 385, which may represent one or more antenna(e). Network interface(s) 380 may also include, for example, a wired network interface to communicate with remote devices via network cable 387, which may be, for example, an Ethernet cable, a coaxial cable, a fiber optic cable, a serial cable, or a parallel cable.


In one embodiment, network interface(s) 380 may provide access to a local area network, for example, by conforming to IEEE 802.11b and/or IEEE 802.11g standards, and/or the wireless network interface may provide access to a personal area network, for example, by conforming to Bluetooth standards. Other wireless network interfaces and/or protocols can also be supported.


IEEE 802.11b corresponds to IEEE Std. 802.11b-1999 entitled “Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 31: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Higher-Speed Physical Layer Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band,” approved Sep. 36, 3999 as well as related documents. IEEE 802.11g corresponds to IEEE Std. 802.11g-2003 entitled “Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 31: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 4: Further Higher Rate Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band,” approved Jun. 27, 2003 as well as related documents. Bluetooth protocols are described in “Specification of the Bluetooth System: Core, Version 3.1,” published Feb. 22, 2001 by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group, Inc. Associated as well as previous or subsequent versions of the Bluetooth standard may also be supported.


In addition to, or instead of, communication via wireless LAN standards, network interface(s) 380 may provide wireless communications using, for example, Time Division, Multiple Access (TDMA) protocols, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) protocols, Code Division, Multiple Access (CDMA) protocols, and/or any other type of wireless communications protocol.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a technique for supporting dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks. The techniques of FIG. 4 can be performed, for example, by an electronic system described in FIG. 3.


Generation of an electronic communication is detected, 410. This can be, for example, determining that a user has clicked/selected a “compose” button on an electronic mail interface. As another example, determining that the user has clicked/selected a “send” button or other mechanism to transmit an electronic mail message. As other examples, sending an instant message or a text message, or leaving a voice mail message can also be detected.


In one embodiment, the system may determine if the electronic message has been delivered, opened and/or viewed. This can be accomplished by, for example, utilization of read receipts, pixel tracking, link tracking, etc. In one embodiment, dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks are generated for messages that have been delivered, opened or viewed. In one embodiment, the user can choose the triggering event (e.g., send, delivery, opening, viewing, accepting) that opens the response window.


In one embodiment, the system determines if automatic generation of dynamically assigned conditional follow-up tasks has been enabled, 420. As discussed above, a user may have an option to enable/disable generation of follow-up tasks. In some embodiments, follow-up tasks may be generated for all electronic messages, or a party other than the user may determine the parameters.


In one embodiment, the system determines if a reply has been received within the response window, 430. In one embodiment, the system can maintain a log or listing of messages for which automatic follow-up tasks can be created. In one embodiment, the system can maintain a log or listing of reply window closing times after which it checks to determine whether a reply has been received. The system can periodically review the log/listing, or an automatic trigger can be used.


If no reply/response has been received by the end of the response window, a follow-up task is automatically generated, 440. In one embodiment, the system may review email logs to determine if a reply has been received. In an alternate embodiment, the user's email account may be monitored before the closing of the response window to determine if a reply/response has been received.


If no reply is received, 440, the system generates a follow-up task, 450. In one embodiment, the customer relationship management (CRM) system that provides and manages follow-up tasks functions to generate the follow-up task as described. In another embodiment, another entity can create the follow-up tasks within the CRM. For example, an email application, a browser extension, a browser add-on/plug-in, etc.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a conditional follow-up agent. In one embodiment, conditional follow-up agent 500 includes control logic 510, which implements logical functional control to direct operation of conditional follow-up agent 500, and/or hardware associated with directing operation of conditional follow-up agent 500. Logic may be hardware logic circuits and/or software routines. In one embodiment, conditional follow-up agent 500 includes one or more applications 512, which represent code sequence and/or programs that provide instructions to control logic 510.


In one embodiment, conditional follow-up agent 500 includes memory 514, which represents a memory device and/or access to a memory resource for storing data and/or instructions. Memory 514 may include memory local to conditional follow-up agent 500, as well as, or alternatively, including memory of the host system on which conditional follow-up agent 500 resides. Conditional follow-up agent 500 also includes one or more interfaces 516, which represent access interfaces to/from (an input/output interface) conditional follow-up agent 500 with regard to entities (electronic or human) external to conditional follow-up agent 500.


Conditional follow-up agent 500 also includes conditional follow-up engine 520, which represents one or more functions or module that enable conditional follow-up agent 500 to provide the dynamic calendar functionality as described above. The example of FIG. 5 provides several modules that may be included in conditional follow-up engine 520; however, different and/or additional modules may also be included. Example modules that may be involved in providing the conditional follow-up functionality include communication detection module 530, response window module 540, response monitoring module 550, follow-up task module 560, user interface module 570. Each of these modules may further include other sub-modules to provide other functions. As used herein, a module refers to routine, a subsystem, logic circuit, microcode, etc., whether implemented in hardware, software, firmware or some combination thereof.


In one embodiment, communication detection module 530 functions to determine when a communication is in the appropriate stage to trigger the analysis to determine whether a dynamic follow-up tasks should be generated. For example, communication detection module 530 can determine when a user begins to compose an email message, when the user selects an email message recipient, when the user sends an email message. As other, non-email examples, communication detection module 530 can determine when the user composes an instant message, text message or initiates a phone call, etc. In one embodiment, communication detection module 530 can also determine the recipients of the message.


In one embodiment, response window module 540 operates to determine the desired response window (i.e., the amount of time between sending the message and the lack of reply before a follow-up task should be generated). In one embodiment, response window module 540 operates using a default window unless modified. In one embodiment, response window module 540 gathers information from the user interface (e.g., FIG. 2) to determine the response window.


In one embodiment, response monitoring module 550 determines if a reply has been received. In one embodiment, response monitoring module 550 periodically (e.g., once per hour, once per day, every 15 minutes, every 2 days) checks for closed response windows and then searches for replies that satisfy the original message. If none are found, response monitoring module 550 can send and indication to follow-up task module 560 that a reply has not been received.


In one embodiment, follow-up task module 560 operates to generate the follow-up task discussed herein. Follow-up task module can be part of a CRM platform or can be part of a different component (e.g., browser, mail application, calendar application). In one embodiment, in response to an indication from response monitoring module 550, follow-up task module 560 can operate to generate/create a follow-up task that can be assigned to the user generating the original message or a different party (e.g., supervisor, team member).


In one embodiment, user interface module 570 generates all or part of the graphical user interface that the user utilizes to compose communications and/or set parameters for the dynamically generated conditional follow-up tasks, for example, one or more elements of FIG. 2.


Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.


While the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.

Claims
  • 1. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, are configurable to cause the one or more processors to: provide a graphical user communication interface in which an electronic message designating at least one sender and one or more recipients can be composed;generate a follow-up task within an application running on a computing platform communicatively coupled with the graphical user communication interface, the application to provide at least scheduling of a follow-up task corresponding to transmitting the electronic message to the one or more recipients, wherein the follow-up task has an associated date that is subsequent to the transmitting of the electronic message;store data describing the follow-up task in a database; andclear the follow-up task if a response to the electronic message is received by the associated date.
  • 2. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the electronic communications functionality comprises electronic mail.
  • 3. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the composition interface is provided within a browser application.
  • 4. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least a composition interface having at least an interface element to allow a user to customize the follow-up task.
  • 5. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least an interface element to allow a user to select a duration for a response window.
  • 6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the follow-up task is created within an electronic mail application.
  • 7. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the follow-up task is created within a customer relationship management (CRM) environment.
  • 8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein the follow-up task is created within an on-demand services environment.
  • 9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises deleting the follow-up task.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises notifying the sender that the follow-up task is not needed.
  • 11. A computer-implemented method comprising: providing a graphical user communication interface in which an electronic message designating at least one sender and one or more recipients can be composed;generating a follow-up task within an application running on a computing platform communicatively coupled with the graphical user communication interface, the application to provide at least scheduling of a follow-up task corresponding to transmitting the electronic message to the one or more recipients, wherein the follow-up task has an associated date that is subsequent to the transmitting of the electronic message;storing data describing the follow-up task in a database; andclearing the follow-up task if a response to the electronic message is received by the associated date.
  • 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the electronic communications functionality comprises electronic mail.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the composition interface is provided within a browser application.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least a composition interface having at least an interface element to allow a user to customize the follow-up task.
  • 15. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least an interface element to allow a user to select a duration for a response window.
  • 16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the follow-up task is created within an electronic mail application.
  • 17. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the follow-up task is created within a customer relationship management (CRM) environment.
  • 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the follow-up task is created within an on-demand services environment.
  • 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises deleting the follow-up task.
  • 20. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises notifying the sender that the follow-up task is not needed.
  • 21. A hardware electronic computing device to provide access to an electronic communications functionality, the computing device to: provide a graphical user communication interface in which an electronic message designating at least one sender and one or more recipients can be composed;generate a follow-up task within an application running on a computing platform communicatively coupled with the graphical user communication interface, the application to provide at least scheduling of a follow-up task corresponding to transmitting the electronic message to the one or more recipients, wherein the follow-up task has an associated date that is subsequent to the transmitting of the electronic message;store data describing the follow-up task in a database; andclear the follow-up task if a response to the electronic message is received by the associated date.
  • 22. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the electronic communications functionality comprises electronic mail.
  • 23. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the composition interface is provided within a browser application.
  • 24. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least a composition interface having at least an interface element to allow a user to customize the follow-up task.
  • 25. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the graphical user communication interface comprises at least an interface element to allow a user to select a duration for a response window.
  • 26. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the follow-up task is created within an electronic mail application.
  • 27. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the follow-up task is created within a customer relationship management (CRM) environment.
  • 28. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein the follow-up task is created within an on-demand services environment.
  • 29. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises deleting the follow-up task.
  • 30. The hardware electronic computing device of claim 21 wherein clearing the follow-up task comprises notifying the sender that the follow-up task is not needed.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/810,230, entitled “AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF DYNAMICALLY ASSIGNED CONDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP TASKS,” filed Jul. 27, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,762,520 issued Sep. 12, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/141,123, entitled “AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF DYNAMICALLY ASSIGNED CONDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP TASKS,” filed Mar. 31, 2015. The contents of all applications listed above are incorporated herein, by reference, in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (214)
Number Name Date Kind
5438660 Lee et al. Aug 1995 A
5577188 Zhu Nov 1996 A
5608872 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5649104 Carleton et al. Jul 1997 A
5664109 Johnson et al. Sep 1997 A
5715450 Ambrose et al. Feb 1998 A
5761419 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5819038 Carleton et al. Oct 1998 A
5821937 Tonelli et al. Oct 1998 A
5831610 Tonelli et al. Nov 1998 A
5873096 Lim et al. Feb 1999 A
5887120 Wical Mar 1999 A
5918159 Fomukong et al. Jun 1999 A
5963953 Cram et al. Oct 1999 A
6016478 Zhang et al. Jan 2000 A
6092083 Brodersen et al. Jul 2000 A
6169534 Raffel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178425 Brodersen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189011 Lim et al. Feb 2001 B1
6216135 Brodersen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein et al. May 2001 B1
6266669 Brodersen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6295530 Ritchie et al. Sep 2001 B1
6324568 Diec Nov 2001 B1
6324693 Brodersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336137 Lee et al. Jan 2002 B1
D454139 Feldcamp Mar 2002 S
6367077 Brodersen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393605 Loomans May 2002 B1
6405220 Brodersen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6434550 Warner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446089 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6480830 Ford et al. Nov 2002 B1
6535909 Rust Mar 2003 B1
6549908 Loomans Apr 2003 B1
6553563 Ambrose et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560461 Fomukong et al. May 2003 B1
6574635 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577726 Huang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601087 Zhu et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604117 Lim et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604128 Diec Aug 2003 B2
6609150 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6621834 Scherpbier et al. Sep 2003 B1
6654032 Zhu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665648 Brodersen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665655 Warner et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684438 Brodersen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711565 Subramaniam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724399 Katchour et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728702 Subramaniam et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728960 Loomans Apr 2004 B1
6732095 Warshaysky et al. May 2004 B1
6732100 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B1
6732111 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B2
6738767 Chung et al. May 2004 B1
6754681 Brodersen et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763351 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763501 Zhu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768904 Kim Jul 2004 B2
6782383 Subramaniam et al. Aug 2004 B2
6804330 Jones et al. Oct 2004 B1
6826565 Ritchie et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826582 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826745 Coker et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829655 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842748 Warner et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6850949 Warner et al. Feb 2005 B2
7036128 Julia et al. Apr 2006 B1
7289976 Kihneman et al. Oct 2007 B2
7340411 Cook Mar 2008 B2
7340484 S et al. Mar 2008 B2
7343365 Farnham et al. Mar 2008 B2
7370282 Cary May 2008 B2
7509388 Allen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7620655 Larsson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7720674 Kaiser et al. May 2010 B2
7809599 Andrew et al. Oct 2010 B2
7840543 Guiheneuf et al. Nov 2010 B2
7904321 Moore et al. Mar 2011 B2
7958003 De Vries et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979319 Toulotte Jul 2011 B2
8032508 Martinez et al. Oct 2011 B2
8060567 Carroll et al. Nov 2011 B2
8121953 Orttung et al. Feb 2012 B1
8244821 Carroll et al. Aug 2012 B2
8280984 Lance et al. Oct 2012 B2
8682736 Flake et al. Mar 2014 B2
8799826 Missiq et al. Aug 2014 B2
8805833 Nath et al. Aug 2014 B2
8849806 Walker et al. Sep 2014 B2
9762520 Wang Sep 2017 B2
20010044791 Richter et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020007401 Suzuki Jan 2002 A1
20020022986 Coker et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029161 Brodersen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020029376 Ambrose et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035487 Brummel et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035577 Brodersen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042264 Kim Apr 2002 A1
20020042843 Diec Apr 2002 A1
20020072951 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082892 Raffel et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099777 Gupta et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020129352 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140731 Subramaniam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143997 Huang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152102 Brodersen et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161734 Stauber et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162090 Parnell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165742 Robins Nov 2002 A1
20030004971 Gong et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018705 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018830 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030066031 Laane Apr 2003 A1
20030066032 Ramachadran et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069936 Warner et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070000 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070004 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070005 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074418 Coker Apr 2003 A1
20030088545 Subramaniam et al. May 2003 A1
20030101169 Bhatt et al. May 2003 A1
20030120675 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030151633 George et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159136 Huang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030187921 Diec Oct 2003 A1
20030189600 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191743 Brodersen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204427 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206192 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225730 Warner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001092 Rothwein et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010489 Rio Jan 2004 A1
20040015981 Coker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024739 Copperman et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040027388 Berg et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040117443 Barsness Jun 2004 A1
20040128001 Levin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040186860 Lee et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193510 Catahan, Jr. et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199489 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199536 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199543 Braud et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249854 Barnes-Leon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260534 Pak et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260659 Chan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268299 Lei et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038680 McMahon Feb 2005 A1
20050050555 Exley et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075748 Gartland Apr 2005 A1
20050091098 Brodersen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050114777 Szeto May 2005 A1
20050197954 Maitland et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234738 Hodes Oct 2005 A1
20060041460 Aaron Feb 2006 A1
20060075031 Wagner et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085436 Dettinger et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060089945 Paval Apr 2006 A1
20060136832 Keller Jun 2006 A1
20060190546 Daniell Aug 2006 A1
20060190833 SanGiovanni et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060245641 Viola et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070038500 Hammitt et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070113191 Keller May 2007 A1
20070198648 Allen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219875 Toulotte Sep 2007 A1
20070244976 Carroll et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080094205 Thorn Apr 2008 A1
20080126244 Loving et al. May 2008 A1
20080148181 Reyes et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080243564 Busch et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080294482 Bank et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090070322 Salvetti et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090106224 Roulland et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090171988 Kikin-Gil Jul 2009 A1
20090177744 Marlow et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177754 Brezina et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090259670 Inmon Oct 2009 A1
20090307162 Bui et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004971 Lee et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017484 Accapadi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030715 Eustice et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100069035 Johnson Mar 2010 A1
20100115423 Miyashita May 2010 A1
20100122190 Lu May 2010 A1
20100159978 Sierawski Jun 2010 A1
20100162105 Beebe et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191568 Kashyap et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100306185 Smith et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110099189 Barraclough et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110239158 Barraclough et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110314115 Nagaraj Dec 2011 A1
20120011511 Horvitz Jan 2012 A1
20120124153 Carroll et al. May 2012 A1
20120158472 Singh et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173464 Tur et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120231770 Clarke et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120297312 Lance et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120297321 Douglas et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130024924 Brady et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130036369 Mitchell et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130110842 Donneau-Golencer et al. May 2013 A1
20130254305 Cheng et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140006079 Keohane et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019157 Nudd Jan 2014 A1
20140046876 Zhang et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140282135 Segre Sep 2014 A1
20140288990 Moore et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150142489 Block May 2015 A1
20160078455 O'Donnell et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160104159 Butterfield et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160259761 Laborczfalvi Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2424181 Feb 2012 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No PCT/US2016/022217 dated Nov. 28, 2017, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/022217 dated May 23, 2016, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,728 dated May 4, 2017, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/810,230 dated Nov. 10, 2016, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,254 dated Oct. 6, 2017, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/810,230 dated May 10, 2017, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,591 entitled “Adaptive Ontology”, 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983 entitled “Tools and Techniques for Extracting Knowledge from Unstructured Data Retrieved from Personal Data Sources”, 28 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237 entitled “System and Method for Supporting Natural Language Queries and Requests Against a User's Personally Data Cloud”, 52 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,591, dated Jul. 18, 2014, 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983, dated Jun. 9, 2014, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237, dated Aug. 13, 2015, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,728, dated Dec. 15, 2017, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,591, dated Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983, dated Dec. 20, 2013, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983, dated Jul. 2, 2015, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237, dated Feb. 11, 2016, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237, dated Jan. 16, 2014, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237, dated Oct. 29, 2014, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,591, dated Nov. 7, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,983, dated May 20, 2016, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/353,237, dated Jun. 8, 2016, 19 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,254, dated Jun. 1, 2018, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,728, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 22 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170374000 A1 Dec 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62141123 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14810230 Jul 2015 US
Child 15701236 US