Home security systems are notoriously subject to both false alarms and missed alarms. Over 90% of home security alarms are reported to be false alarms. Missed alarms, from failure to turn the security system on, are estimated to occur 30% to 50% of the time. The principal failing of these systems is in the extra time and care required to disable security systems before entry and to enable them upon leaving.
Law provides more severe penalties for “Breaking and Entering” than for apparently non-forced entry. Further, forced entry is usually noisy and may result in unwanted attention. Would-be intruders can therefore be expected to first try passkeys, lock picks or like tests of lock integrity before generating evidence of forcible entry.
The acts of locking a door behind on leaving and unlocking it upon returning are relatively automatic behaviors, much easier to maintain than additional and often complex arming and disarming sequences required with current home security systems. There is a need, therefore, for a security system that automatically arms upon locking a conventional keyed door and automatically disarms upon unlocking that door. Further, there is a need to reliably detect and alarm upon lockset tampering and similar indicators of attempted illegal entry. These needs would ideally be filled by a device able to operate with existing mechanical locksets and with all alarm operations fully controlled by normal actuations of the existing lockset.
A preferred embodiment of the device for detecting tampering with standard mechanical locksets comprises; a pair of electrical contacts placed within the recess that receives lock's bolt, a ribbon cable with three conductors, and a control box. The contacts provide an electrical connection to the bolt and hence the entire lockset when the bolt is in its extended or locked position. The two contacts are each connected to individual conductors in a ribbon cable that also carries a third conductor, positioned to run vertically along the door frame below the bolt receptacle. The third vertical conductor approaches the other two at approximately the height of the bolt, and then all three make a short horizontal run to a control box secured to the interior door frame or wall.
The two contacts within the bolt recess operate cooperatively to signal whether the bolt is in its extended and locked position or in its retracted and open position. The active, or energized, of the two contacts also serves to convey a low-level RF signal to the entire lockset including all externally accessible mounting and operational features. When a person standing by the door touches any part of the energized lockset, the capacitance measured between the lockset and the vertical wire is significantly increased.
Logic circuitry within the control box is used to discriminate between normal operation of the lockset and operations indicative of tampering. Representative tampering detected includes sequentially testing multiple keys, use of lock-picks, and application of disassembly tools.
The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, both as to its structure and operation, will be best understood from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts.
Referring now to
Both leaf-springs, the adhesive to secure them in place, the conductors attached to the leaf-springs, and all required insulation comprise an integral ribbon cable assembly 9. Orientation of the cable assembly is conveniently established by positioning the cable corner between the two contacts to coincide with the corner of the bolt recess as shown in
Detection of change in oscillation frequency, indicative of human contact is obtained through frequency change detector 18 comprised of phase locked loop (PLL) 19, monostable multivibrator 20 and D-type flip flop 21. Phase locked loop 19 is configured tomaintain phase lock with oscillator 14 over frequency changes associated with normal circuit noise, component drift, and environmental changes. Loop filter 22 is configured to control how quickly the phase locked loop can react to changes in the frequency of oscillation of oscillator 14. Slow changes in oscillation frequency are tracked by means of pulses from the PLL's phase detector, approximately one per oscillator cycle, that continuously provide the feedback required to maintain phase lock between randomly drifting oscillator 14 and the PLL's voltage controlled oscillator (VCO). Positive pulses from the phase detector drive the PLL's VCO toward phase lock through increasing VCO frequency while negative pulses achieve lock by driving the PLL's VCO frequency down.
Upon a person touching the external lockset, the magnitude of the change in oscillator 14 frequency is too large for the PLL to accommodate with a single short feedback pulse and the output of the PLL's phase detector remains “saturated” in a low (negative) state for several oscillator periods. A sustained high or low state to the input of monostable multivibrator 20 permits this timer to complete a timing cycle that theretofore was continually restarted before completion, with the edge of each positive going pulse from the PLL's phase detector. Upon full completion of a timing cycle, the NOT Q output of monostable multivibrator 20 provides a positive going pulse to the clock input of D-type flip flop 21. If the PLL's phase detector output is still low when the monostable multivibrator completes its timing cycle then the Q output of D-type flip flop is clocked from high to low. This negative going transition at the Q output of flip flop 20 reliably signals human contact with the lockset which is further qualified as discussed below.
To obtain automatic arming or enabling of the alarm, it's necessary to distinguish between contact associated with normally locking the door from contact associated with tampering. This is accomplished as described below: When the lockset is transitioned from its unlocked state to its locked state, the FET output of RF detector circuit 15 makes a transition from low to high. This transition leaves D-type flip flop 23 in its low or cleared state and ensures that the next positive going pulse at the clock input will, through the connection of the D input to supply, cause the Q output of the flip flop to go high. Because flip flop 23 can only be returned to its cleared state by reopening the lockset's bolt, only a single positive going output pulse is possible after each lockset closure.
Assuming, then, that the lockset is being locked, the following sequence of events will follow on detection of contact with the lockset as the bolt is engaged. First, D-type flip flop 21, as discussed above, will transition its Q output from high to low. This in turn will cause the Q output of set-reset (S/R) latch 24 to go high. At the same time, the FET output of RF detector 15 is also high by virtue of the bolt being in the closed or locked position. Both high signals serve as inputs to gate 25, causing its output to go low and in turn enabling binary counter/oscillator 26 to start. After a short delay of approximately 10 seconds, the eighth stage of counter 25 transitions from low to high and sends a positive going pulse to the clock input of flip flop 23, causing a positive going transition on its Q output. This positive going transition triggers monostable multivibrator 27, causing it to produce a timed pulse approximately ¼ second long which is positive going on the Q output and negative going on the NOT Q output. The pulse on the Q output serves to “chirp” an audible alarm indicating the system is armed. The pulse on the NOT Q output serves to set flip flop 21 Q output to its high state and S/R flip flop 24 to its reset state and thereby to cause the output of gate 25 to reset and halt counter oscillator 26. In this condition the system is armed and will announce any tampering detected with an alarm signal commencing approximately ten seconds after any contact not first culminated in successful bolt retraction. This alarm signal will be maintained until either 10 seconds after the lockset is opened and reclosed, or upon automatic shutoff after sufficient time to overflow counter/oscillator 26 and trigger timer 27 on the negative going transition of the final counter stage.
If the bolt is withdrawn from the bolt recess before completion of the approximately 10 second delay, no alarm will be announced and the alarm system will be disabled by virtue of the low logic signal from the FET output of RF detector 15. It should be noted that simple removal of the bolt from the bolt recess after the alarm sounds will not reset the alarm unless the bolt is first reinserted and the relatively short time delay is allowed to lapse, This serves to prevent silencing of the alarm upon destruction of the lockset.
Signaling lines 28 and 29 provide for connection to cooperative external components to signal respectively whether the lockset tampering detection device is in its alarmed state or not and whether it is in its armed state or not.
Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described.
This application is a continuation of my Provisional Patent Application No. 60/319,451 filed Aug. 6, 2002
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4360803 | Heiland | Nov 1982 | A |
4465997 | Hines | Aug 1984 | A |
5062670 | Grossman | Nov 1991 | A |
5266923 | Tseng | Nov 1993 | A |
5680094 | Guim et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5757269 | Roth et al. | May 1998 | A |
5825288 | Wojdan | Oct 1998 | A |
6020816 | Agozzino | Feb 2000 | A |
6225903 | Soloway et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050030178 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60319451 | Aug 2002 | US |