This application is a non-provisional application of Ser. No. 61/637,358, titled “Automatic Microphone Muting of Noises by Microphone Arrays,” filed Apr. 24, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to speakerphones and other desk or table-located microphone systems.
There are often undesirable noises occurring continuously during an audio or video conference. Examples of these noises include keyboard sounds and paper rustling. These noises can be distracting, particularly during audio or video conferences with a large group of people when one person's keyboard can disrupt another person's speech. Thus, it is highly desirable to automatically mute the microphone when these sounds are present and no one is talking. However, there is no reliable method to discriminate between speech sounds and noises.
One example of a prior method of dealing with this issue is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2008/0279366 which addressed this problem by providing a signal from the user's keyboard to the conferencing application such that the user's computer provides a signal when a key is depressed on the keyboard. The conferencing application, either executing on the computer or on a separate device, mutes the microphone for a period of time upon receiving the key depression signal. While this method is helpful in eliminating keyboard noises, it is problematic because while the keyboard sound is muted, so is any speech occurring at the same time. This can cause gaps in speech and result in confusion and disruption of the conference. Moreover, this method does not eliminate other noises in the environment such as paper rustling or ringing of a cell phone.
In one embodiment according to the present invention, a vertical microphone array is used to distinguish the tilt angle of a received sound. If the sound is close to horizontal, the audio is muted. This eliminates paper rustling, keyboard clicks and the like. If the sound is above a given angle from horizontal, it is not muted, as this indicates a person speaking.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an implementation of apparatus and methods consistent with the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain advantages and principles consistent with the invention.
Tilt angle measurements can be made periodically in short intervals. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, tilt angle measurements are made every 20 ms. If the tilt angle measured is below a predetermined angle, the audio is muted for that 20 ms interval. Otherwise, the audio is not muted. Therefore when someone is talking and there are no table sounds, the talker's speech will be transmitted with no artifacts.
In addition to situations when the sound is all from table noise and situations when all the sounds originate from a participant talking, sometimes during conferences as the participant is talking they are also typing on a keyboard or causing other noise in the environment. Although table noise can be distracting during conferences, it is preferable to hear these noises if they are being generated simultaneously as a speech by the same participant, than to also remove the speech. To ensure that speech which is accompanied by table noise is not removed, the system is configured such that if a sound source is detected in two 20 ms intervals as originating from a tilt angle greater than five degrees, no muting is allowed for the next half-second. During simultaneous table noise and speech, the result is that both table noise and speech will be heard. However, within half-second after the person stops speaking the table noise will be muted.
Although only two microphones are shown in the microphone arrays 202, it should be understood that plurality of microphones can be used.
Accordingly tilt angle measurement can be used to efficiently and effectively eliminate noise generated around the table while any speech by the participant is passed through.
It should be emphasized that the previously described embodiments of the present invention, particularly any preferred embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the previously described embodiments of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention and protected by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6922206 | Chu et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7843486 | Blair et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
20090022336 | Visser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090164212 | Chan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100158268 | Marton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166219 | Marton | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110285808 | Feng et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2472904 | Jul 2012 | EP |
6482887 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01-125098 | May 1989 | JP |
1-82887 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2006304125 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2008054071 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2011-244455 | Dec 2011 | JP |
200849219 | Dec 2008 | TW |
200939210 | Sep 2009 | TW |
201015541 | Apr 2010 | TW |
2010074583 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010074583 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action issued in co-pending JP Patent Application No. 2013-090813, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 5 pages (including translation). |
Taiwanese Office Action issued in co-pending TW Patent Application No. 102114432, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 6 pages (including translation). |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection (Office Action) Patent Application No. 2013-090813, dated Mar. 6, 2014 (Five pgs). |
European Search Report issued in co-pending European Application No. 13164412.2, dated Jul. 25, 2013, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130294612 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61637358 | Apr 2012 | US |