1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an automatic sampler and a needle of the automatic sampler for an analyzer which performs liquid analysis, such as a liquid chromatograph. More particularly, the needle is subject to a surface treatment or coating which reduces contamination of the needle caused by chemical adsorption.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the automatic sampler shown in
The injector valve 1 is connected to a liquid chromatograph apparatus 10 through pipes so as to introduce a liquid sample into a flow path of mobile phase liquid in the liquid chromatograph apparatus 10.
An example of an operational sequence of the sample suction and sample injection processes using an auto-injector as shown in
In the automatic sampler as described above, a step of rinsing the needle 7 is necessarily included after any sample is sampled. The rinsing step is very important to avoid mixing a preceding sample into another sample to be analyzed (cross contamination).
In the related art, mainly measures against physical contamination have been taken to prevent cross contamination produced through the intermediation of the needle 7. For example, the needle 7 was rinsed, or the surface of the needle 7 was polished and smoothed to help prevent dirt from adhering thereto. However, contamination of the needle 7 is not limited to only physical contamination.
More specifically, stainless steel is commonly used as a material for making the needle 7. Stainless steel is an alloy with an iron base. Therefore, iron is exposed on the surface of stainless steel microscopically, and accordingly, some amount of sample component is adsorbed on the iron portion of the stainless steel due to the chemical properties of iron. For example, a chemically adsorptive phenomenon is easily produced in basic matter because its hydroxyl group is attracted to iron on the surface of stainless steel. The sample component once adsorbed chemically cannot be removed easily, even if it is vigorously rinsed with organic-solvent-based detergent. Such a sample component adsorbed on the surface of the needle 7 and remaining after rinsing is partially mixed into the next sample to be analyzed. Thus, cross contamination is, though slightly in some cases, brought about.
Such cross contamination caused by chemical adsorption has heretofore been substantially overlooked. In recent years, however, with advances in analytic sensitization, it has become necessary to take effective measures against even slight cross contamination.
The present invention was developed in consideration of the drawbacks associated with the related art. It is an object of the invention to provide an automatic sampler and a needle for the automatic sampler in which contamination, caused by chemical adsorption and still remaining after measures against physical contamination are taken on the surface of the needle, is restrained so that the automatic sampler can perform highly sensitive analysis.
In order to attain the foregoing object, an automatic sampler according to the present invention comprises a needle which is subject to a surface treatment for reducing chemical adsorption. More specifically, the needle of the present invention contains a base metal, and the surface of the needle is coated with a coating material which is lower in chemical activity than the chemical activity of the base metal of the needle. In one embodiment, the surface of the needle is plated with a noble metal, such as gold or platinum. Alternatively, the surface of the needle may be coated with synthetic resin such as PEEK which is superior in chemical resistance. Further, a quartz thin film may be formed on the surface of the needle. Moreover, a non-noble metal may be plated or deposited on the surface of the needle. The automatic sampler of the present invention is preferably used for a liquid chromatography. It is possible to obtain a practically sufficient antifouling effect, even against contamination coming from chemical adsorption which cannot be removed sufficiently by related-art measures against physical contamination. Thus, it is possible to provide an automatic sampler which can perform highly sensitive analysis.
The needle 7 shown in
In the needle 7′ shown in
In particular, PEEK is an organic material, and accordingly, hardly shows a chemical adsorptive property. In addition, PEEK shows superior resistance to various chemicals, and is therefore also used as a material for piping in a liquid chromatograph. Thus, PEEK is preferably used for the needle 7′ in the automatic sampler for the liquid chromatograph.
In these experiments, a sample was analyzed which included a solution of a strong basic chlorhexidine hydrochloride diluted with a liquid. The liquid used was the same as the mobile phase liquid used in the liquid chromatograph. An area A of a peak obtained by analyzing this sample was calculated. Subsequently, after rinsing the needle, only the mobile phase liquid (a blank sample) was analyzed so that an area B of a peak appearing for the same retention time was measured. The degree of cross contamination was expressed by a ratio C (%) of B to A.
C=9340/39637446=0.024%
Next,
C=321/49126387=0.00065%
From these results, it can be understood that the degree of cross contamination is reduced to about 1/40 when the needle 7 is coated with the platinum-plated layer T, and a remarkable improvement effect can therefore be obtained.
The setting conditions of the liquid chromatograph in these experiments was as follows.
mobile phase: 100 mM perchloric acid contianing phosphoric acid buffer (pH 2.6): acetonitrile=55:45
flow rate: 0.2 mL/min
column: VP-ODS φ2 mm×150 mm (means a diameter)
oven temperature: 40° C.
detector: UV 260 nm
injection amount: 2 μL
According to the present invention, the surface of the needle 7, 7′ is covered with a coating material lower in chemical activity than the base metal B of the needle 7, 7′.
Of course, the coating material is not limited to the embodiments described herein. For example, when the base metal B is plated with a noble metal such as any other element of the platinum group or gold in place of platinum, it is possible to obtain an effect equal to or close to that in the case of platinum. In addition, when the base metal B is plated with a non-noble metal such as nickel or chromium which are lower in chemical activity than iron, a deserved improvement effect can be expected, though it comes short of that in the case where the base metal B is plated with noble metal.
In addition, PFE (polyfluorethylene), or PE (polyethylene) may be used in place of PEEK as the synthetic resin coating P. In this case, an effect corresponding to the properties of such a raw material can be expected.
In the embodiments described above, only the outer surface of the needle 7, 7′ is covered with a coating material, but the inner surface of the needle 7, 7′ is not coated. Therefore, there may be concern that the inner surface of the needle would remain as a cause of cross contamination. However, the surface area of the inner surface is smaller than 20% of the total surface area of the needle 7, 7′, and hence, the influence of the inner surface is not very significant. In addition, the inner surface of the needle 7, 7′ can be rinsed efficiently if the pressure and flow rate of the rinse are increased. Thus, the influence of the metal surface of the inner surface on cross-contamination is limited to an ignorable extent.
Notwithstanding the small influence of the inner surface of the needle and the improved methods for rinsing, to further reduce cross contamination, it is desired that the inner surface of the needle 7, 7′ also be coated with an inactive material.
With a chemical vapor deposition method (CVD) already known as a method for coating the inner surface of a capillary, a metallic thin film can additionally be formed on the inner surface of the needle 7, 7′. In addition, the inactive material is not limited to metal, but a thin film of high-purity quartz or other material may be formed. Coating an inner wall of a capillary with a quartz thin film is a method put into practical use for treating the inner surface of a column in a gas chromatograph. High-purity quartz is extremely low in adsorptive activity so that contamination can be reduced to the utmost extent by this treatment.
The needle 7, 7′ according to the present invention can be applied to any automatic sampler of such a type that liquid samples are sampled sequentially from a plurality of vials 8 through the needle 7, 7′, including the automatic sampler shown in
Incidentally, the numerical values of the dimensions shown in
As described above in detail, the present invention pays attention to the fact that contamination still remains after a needle is rinsed or polished due to chemical adsorption. In order to solve the problem, the present invention uses a coating material low in chemically adsorptive activity which is applied to the surface of the needle. When the automatic sampler according to the present invention is combined with a liquid chromatograph, disturbance due to cross contamination is eliminated so that analysis can be made highly sensitive.
While the presently preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is to be understood that the disclosures are for the purpose of illustration and that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2001-022663 | Jan 2001 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3883305 | Hoskins et al. | May 1975 | A |
3915677 | Oppegaard | Oct 1975 | A |
3949751 | Birch et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4309912 | Smith | Jan 1982 | A |
4404862 | Harris, Sr. | Sep 1983 | A |
4558588 | Beaudoin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4582060 | Bailey | Apr 1986 | A |
4708782 | Andresen et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4781198 | Kanabrocki | Nov 1988 | A |
4945640 | Garg et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4946651 | Liston et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5012845 | Averette | May 1991 | A |
5171530 | Pennatto | Dec 1992 | A |
5183043 | Band et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5223226 | Wittmer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5354537 | Moreno | Oct 1994 | A |
5372782 | Karkantis et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391499 | Karkantis et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5468452 | Hagiwara | Nov 1995 | A |
5468453 | Holt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5637399 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5789252 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820622 | Gross et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843378 | El-Hage et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866004 | Houck et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879949 | Cole et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5938604 | Wagner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954954 | Houck et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5997517 | Whitbourne | Dec 1999 | A |
6117394 | Smith | Sep 2000 | A |
6132582 | King et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135993 | Hussman | Oct 2000 | A |
6148666 | Roesicke | Nov 2000 | A |
6306176 | Whitbourne | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6350273 | Minagawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365024 | Li et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368392 | Ohtake et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6455316 | Turner et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475391 | Safir et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482362 | Smith | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6539410 | Klass | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6599276 | Humphrey | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638259 | Palasis et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6715693 | Dam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733728 | Mimura et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6793632 | Sohrab | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6837884 | Woloszko | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6899708 | Speck et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7055402 | Staples et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20020072706 | Hiblar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020150511 | Wiktor | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155620 | Hutchens et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168778 | Andrien et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013201 | Sklar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014047 | Woloszko et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014051 | Woloszko | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131031 | Klass | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171760 | Gambale | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030233065 | Steward et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040087933 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050017099 | Batich et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050217393 | Tomita et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020102185 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |