Within any number of business, social or academic enterprises, electronic mail typically serves as the primary source of communication among members of the enterprise, as well as, among members of the enterprise and persons outside the enterprise. Unfortunately, typical electronic mail (email) users receive and review tens or even hundreds of email messages on a daily basis and the users often have trouble managing and prioritizing incoming electronic mail items. This is especially problematic when the messages contain requests or tasks that need a response or follow-up by the receiving user. In particular, many users often receive tasks or job assignments as part of individual electronic mail messages, for example, “Please redesign the company web site by next Friday,” but because the example task is embedded in an electronic mail message, the user may fail to generate a corresponding electronic task or calendar item to remind the user to complete the given task.
Similarly, email and other electronic communications often have embedded content that may be considered calendar entries, but that may be overlooked by the receiver. For example, a statement may be included in an email message like “Let's meet for lunch at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday.” Such a statement, particularly if responded to, is very similar to a calendar entry, but if the user forgets to mark his/her calendar with the stated meeting, he/she may miss the meeting.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
Embodiments of the present invention solve the above and other problems by providing automatic detection of tasks and calendar items from electronic communications for populating into associated tasks applications and calendaring applications. Text content retrieved from one or more electronic communications, for example, electronic mail items, text messages, Internet-based chat sessions, and the like may be extracted and parsed for determining whether keywords or terms contained in the parsed text may lead to a classification of the text content or part of the text content as a task. Identified tasks may be presented to a user for verification, and if accepted, may be automatically populated into the user's tasks application or in tasks applications of other users, as required. Similarly, text content from such sources may be parsed for keywords and terms that may be identified as indicating calendar items, for example, meeting requests. Identified calendar items may be presented to the user for verification, and if accepted, may be automatically populated into the user's calendar application as a calendar entry or may be automatically populated into the calendar applications of other users, as required.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that the following detailed description is explanatory only and is not restrictive of the invention as claimed.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention. In the drawings:
As briefly described above, embodiments of the present invention are directed to automatically classifying information extracted from one or more text sources, for example, electronic mail items, text messages, Internet-based chat forums, and the like as tasks or calendar items. Extracted information classified as tasks or calendar items may be presented to a user for verification/acceptance. If the user accepts the recommended tasks or calendar items, the accepted tasks may be automatically populated into the user's tasks application and tasks list, and the accepted calendar items may be automatically populated into the user's calendar application as a calendar entry. Similarly, such accepted tasks and calendar items may be populated into the tasks or calendar applications of other users, as required. For example, if an item is classified and accepted as a task that requires activity from multiple users, the task may be presented to each of the multiple users for acceptance, or the task may be automatically populated into the tasks list of the multiple users. Likewise, if an item is classified as a calendar entry, the calendar entry may be populated into the calendar applications of one or more users, for example, as meeting requests that may be accepted by one or more users upon automatic sending of a meeting request in response to the classification of a content item as a meeting request.
The following description refers to the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the following description to refer to the same or similar elements. While embodiments of the invention may be described, modifications, adaptations, and other implementations are possible. For example, substitutions, additions, or modifications may be made to the elements illustrated in the drawings, and the methods described herein may be modified by substituting, reordering, or adding stages to the disclosed methods. Accordingly, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the proper scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements through the several figures, aspects of the present invention and the exemplary operating environment will be described. While the invention will be described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with an application program that runs on an operating system on a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may also be implemented in combination with other program modules.
Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Referring to the example electronic mail item contained in the user interface 100, an electronic mail message contains various text-based information items. As illustrated in the first sentence of the example electronic mail message, the phrase “facility design project team” 105 is noted and contains terms that may be used for applying extracted information to one or more tasks, calendar entries, and the like. A phrase 106 is also noted stating “add an additional wing” which may be utilized as described herein for extracting and classifying a task item such as a task of “add an additional wing” as part of a building project. Another phrase 110 of “Monday at noon” is noted which may be extracted and classified as a potential calendar item. Finally, another phrase 115 of “Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. with Ann and Joe in my office” contains information that may be utilized for generating a calendar entry that may be automatically populated into the receiving user's calendar application and also in the calendar applications of the two other users identified in the phrase 115.
At operation 204, text and associated metadata extracted from the received conversation item is analyzed and processed into individual text components (e.g., words, phrases, terms, numeric strings, and the like). Received text content and metadata are analyzed and formatted as necessary for text processing described below. According to embodiments, the text content and metadata analysis may be performed by a text parser operative to parse text content and metadata for processing the text into one or more text components (e.g., sentences and terms comprising the one or more sentences). For example, if the text content and metadata are formatted according to a structured data language, for example, Extensible Markup Language (XML), the text content and metadata analysis may include parsing the retrieved text content and metadata according to the associated structured data language for processing the text as described herein. For another example, the text content and metadata may be retrieved from an online source such as an Internet-based chat forum where the retrieved text may be formatted according to a formatting such as Hypertext Markup Language (HTML). According to embodiments, the text content and metadata analysis may include formatting of the retrieved text content and metadata from such a source so that it may be processed for conversation topics as described herein.
A text processing application may be employed whereby the text is broken into one or more text components for determining whether the received/retrieved text may contain terms that may be expertise tags or that may be used for searching for stored expertise tags. Breaking the text into the one or more text components may include breaking the text into individual sentences followed by breaking the individual sentences into individual tokens, for example, words, numeric strings, etc.
Such text processing is well known to those skilled in the art and may include breaking text portions into individual sentences and individual tokens according to known parameters. For example, punctuation marks and capitalization contained in a text portion may be utilized for determining the beginning and ending of a sentence. Spaces contained between portions of text may be utilized for determining breaks between individual tokens, for example, individual words, contained in individual sentences. Alphanumeric strings following known patterns, for example, five digit numbers associated with zip codes, may be utilized for identifying portions of text. In addition, initially identified sentences or sentence tokens may be passed to one or more recognizer programs for comparing initially identified sentences or tokens against databases of known sentences or tokens for further determining individual sentences or tokens. For example, a word contained in a given sentence may be passed to a database to determine whether the word is a person's name, the name of a city, the name of a company, or whether a particular token is a recognized acronym, trade name, or the like. As should be appreciated, a variety of means may be employed for comparing sentences or tokens of sentences against known, words, or other alphanumeric strings for further identifying those text items.
At component/operation 208, the processed text and metadata components are passed through a feature extraction process. According to an embodiment, the feature extraction process may include extracting relevant components from the text and the metadata processed from the received conversation item such that the extracted features may be used for identifying and classifying components of the received conversation item as a task item or calendar item. For example, as should be appreciated, some text components and associated metadata may be discarded as having no relevance to a potential task or calendar item. For example, standard language articles such as “a,” “and,” “the,” and other terms not typically associated with a task or calendar item may be discarded.
Features extracted during the feature extraction process may include names contained in “To” lines, “From” lines and text contained within a received conversation item. Other features extracted may include dates, times, subject line, information associated with other recipients of the conversation item, and the like. In addition, individual text components, for example, words and phrases, extracted from the conversation item may be compared against lists of words and phrases maintained in a database of words and phrases to identify those words and phrases for potential use in a task or calendar item. For example, referring back to
At component/operation 210, a task or meeting identification is performed. The task/meeting identification process may be performed in association with the project data/metadata component 214 and training data 210 for assistance in classifying extracted conversation item features as a task or calendar item. According to an embodiment, the task/meeting identification processing may be performed by a machine-learned classifier application by comparing the extracted conversation item features with other data/metadata including data/metadata contained in a given project workspace associated with the sender or various recipients of the received conversation item.
According to one embodiment, the task/meeting identification classifier application may be a linear support vector application. Other suitable algorithms may be used or combined with the linear support vector application including maximum entropy or conditional random fields algorithms, or these types of applications and algorithms may be combined with manually pre-defined patterns of text components matched against an input string to identify text components as a task or calendar item. For example, manually entered pre-defined patterns may include such phrases as “meet me at” followed by a date, time, or location that may be classified as a calendar entry. Other manually entered pre-defined text patterns may include text patterns typically associated with tasks such as the text pattern of “complete the project” followed by a date or time.
According to one embodiment, the tasks/meeting identification classifier application may be trained on manually labeled conversation item data, for example, electronic mail data, text messaging data, and the like, where the manually labeled data may consist of individual sentences or groups of sentences that are labeled as tasks, non-tasks, calendar items or non-calendar items. These sentences may be represented as feature vectors, and the task/meeting identification classifier application may be trained on these feature vectors as well as the metadata properties of the received conversation item from which those sentences are derived. As described above, such features may include, for example, conversation item authors, recipients, subject line information, and the like.
Continuing with the task/meeting identification operation 210, based on the extracted features and feature vectors generated during the feature extraction operation 208, the task/meeting identification classifier application may assign a probability that a sentence containing identified features contains a task or calendar item based on the feature vectors and metadata for the item. At operation 212, a candidate task or meeting item may be generated, and at operation 218, a slot/properties extractor application may use the information found in the input text and metadata and training data 214, 216 to extract slots like due dates, assignee, topic (for tasks), meeting date/time, attendees (for meeting items) and the like. According to an embodiment, use of training data 216 includes use of a data model or machine-learned classifier model built from training data.
At operation 220, resulting candidate tasks or meetings and associated slots may be assembled and may be presented to a user as illustrated and described below with respect to
As should be appreciated, storage of the accepted, corrected, or replaced task or calendar item may include automatically populating the task or calendar item into the user's task application or calendar application, and may include automatically presenting the task or calendar item to other users identified as part of the task or calendar item classification process. That is, if classification of a text string as including a task is accepted by the user, and the accepted task item includes identification of another user, then the task item may be presented to the other user for acceptance, or the task item may be automatically populated into the other user's task application. In the case of a project workspace, acceptance of a task or calendar item by a given user who is a member of the project workspace may cause the accepted task or calendar item to be automatically populated into a task application and associated tasks list or into an associated calendar application for all members of the project workspace to review. The system/method 200 ends at operation 230.
A new task/meeting item information text box or field 317 is included to allow a user to manually enter a replacement task or meeting item. If the user accepts the recommended task or calendar item, the recommended task or calendar item is stored and processed, as described above. If the user rejects the recommended task or calendar item, then the recommended task or calendar item is not stored and processed to various users as described above. If desired, the user may make corrections to the presented task or calendar item in the text box 315, or the user may enter a replacement task or calendar item in the text box or field 317.
A slots presentation text box or field 318 is illustrated for providing slot information for designated task or calendar items, for example, due dates, task assignee, task topic, meeting dates/times, meeting attendees and the like. As with the other presented information, the user may accept, reject, correct or replace slots information, as desired, via the user interface 305. Once the user accepts the new or corrected task item or calendar item, along with any relevant slots information, the new or corrected task item or calendar item may be stored and processed, as described above with reference to
As described above, embodiments of the invention may be implemented via local and remote computing and data storage systems, including the systems illustrated and described with reference to
With reference to
Computing device 600 may have additional features or functionality. For example, computing device 600 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
As stated above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in system memory 604, including operating system 605. While executing on processing unit 602, programming modules 606 and may include the task and calendar item extraction system 200 which may include program modules containing sufficient computer-executable instructions, which when executed, perform functionalities as described herein. The aforementioned process is an example, and processing unit 602 may perform other processes. Other programming modules that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include electronic mail and contacts applications, word processing applications, spreadsheet applications, database applications, slide presentation applications, drawing or computer-aided application programs, etc.
Generally, consistent with embodiments of the invention, program modules may include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that may perform particular tasks or that may implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, embodiments of the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may be practiced in an electrical circuit comprising discrete electronic elements, packaged or integrated electronic chips containing logic gates, a circuit utilizing a microprocessor, or on a single chip containing electronic elements or microprocessors. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced using other technologies capable of performing logical operations such as, for example, AND, OR, and NOT, including but not limited to mechanical, optical, fluidic, and quantum technologies. In addition, embodiments of the invention may be practiced within a general purpose computer or in any other circuits or systems.
Embodiments of the invention, for example, may be implemented as a computer process (method), a computing system, or as an article of manufacture, such as a computer program product or computer readable media. The computer program product may be a computer storage media readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process. Accordingly, the present invention may be embodied in hardware and/or in software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.). In other words, embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable or computer-readable storage medium having computer-usable or computer-readable program code embodied in the medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system. A computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The term computer readable media as used herein may include computer storage media. Computer storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. System memory 604, removable storage 609, and non-removable storage 610 are all computer storage media examples (i.e., memory storage.) Computer storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by computing device 600. Any such computer storage media may be part of device 600. Computing device 600 may also have input device(s) 612 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 614 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. may also be included. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used.
The term computer readable media as used herein may also include communication media. Communication media may be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” may describe a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.
Embodiments of the present invention, for example, are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. The functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
While certain embodiments of the invention have been described, other embodiments may exist. Furthermore, although embodiments of the present invention have been described as being associated with data stored in memory and other storage mediums, data can also be stored on or read from other types of computer-readable media, such as secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks, or a CD-ROM, a carrier wave from the Internet, or other forms of RAM or ROM. Further, the disclosed methods' stages may be modified in any manner, including by reordering stages and/or inserting or deleting stages, without departing from the invention.
All rights including copyrights in the code included herein are vested in and the property of the Applicant. The Applicant retains and reserves all rights in the code included herein, and grants permission to reproduce the material only in connection with reproduction of the granted patent and for no other purpose.
While the specification includes examples, the invention's scope is indicated by the following claims. Furthermore, while the specification has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, the claims are not limited to the features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example for embodiments of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5864848 | Horvitz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6278996 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6452083 | Pachet | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6505167 | Horvitz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553358 | Horvitz | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560590 | Shwe et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581050 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6622160 | Horvitz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657643 | Horvitz | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6714967 | Horvitz | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6816885 | Raghunandan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6931384 | Horvitz et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6990634 | Conroy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7146381 | Allen et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158980 | Shen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7194681 | Horvitz | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7409423 | Horvitz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7444383 | Horvitz | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454393 | Horvitz et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496500 | Reed | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7742048 | Moore et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7877447 | Wilson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8055707 | Desai et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8108206 | Hufnagel et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8166178 | Horvitz | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8326859 | Paek | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8423347 | Tunning | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8484745 | Bank | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8554477 | Coughlin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8631080 | Goodman | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8676566 | Myaeng et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8694593 | Wren | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8825474 | Zhai et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832205 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8868670 | Bagga et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903924 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9085303 | Wolverton et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9094361 | Camacho et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9127957 | Smith | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9170993 | Kalia et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9313162 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9378196 | Tomkins et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9460095 | Ayers et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9514448 | Prakash et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9633114 | Kamanger | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9686367 | Sundstrom | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9904669 | Gunaratna et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10200318 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10361981 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20020076109 | Hertzfeld | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020174170 | Ioffe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184321 | Fishman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030187632 | Menich | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012638 | Donnelli et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040148356 | Bishop, Jr. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040260772 | Mullen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050076037 | Shen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076084 | Loughmiller | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091578 | Madan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108354 | Lisitsa | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165631 | Horvitz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192992 | Reed | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060074844 | Frankel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060168040 | Kushmerick | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195785 | Portnoy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218553 | Dore | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005409 | Boss | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038711 | McBeth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043838 | Litteaut et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073810 | Adams et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080033950 | Lemay | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034315 | Langoulant | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040189 | Tong | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065719 | Wilson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086300 | Anismovich et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080147622 | Koike | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172606 | White | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201636 | Fujiwara | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281922 | Renshaw et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090063993 | Nyamgondalu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076795 | Bangalore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083112 | Bhogal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106201 | White | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090214034 | Mehrotra | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228583 | Pocklington | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235280 | Tannier | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248480 | Miksovsky | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100070877 | Scott et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082751 | Meijer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145694 | Ju | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110106892 | Nelson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119212 | De Bruin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125734 | Duboue et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145822 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145823 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184936 | Lymberopoulos | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110252351 | Sikora | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120109965 | Nagendran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143961 | Jonsson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120245925 | Guha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253788 | Heck et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254764 | Ayloo | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278388 | Kleinbart et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296832 | Beringer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006973 | Caldwell et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130138746 | Tardelli et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130179440 | Gordon | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218836 | Sullivan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268468 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297317 | Lee | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140136256 | Brown | May 2014 | A1 |
20140188541 | Goldsmith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214404 | Kalia et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215472 | Motahari Nezhad et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219434 | Youel et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140279622 | Lamoureux et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317030 | Shen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140365518 | Calo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150032724 | Thirugnanasundaram et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033155 | Camacho et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150143258 | Carolan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150169539 | Jamrog et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215253 | Vemuri et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150294220 | Oreif | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150302301 | Petersen | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150348551 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160086268 | Labuszewski et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160104094 | Yom-tov et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125370 | Grassadonia et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179934 | Stubley et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182417 | Cordes et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196490 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160335572 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160337295 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170047064 | Kirihara | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170149703 | Willett et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101198976 | Jun 2008 | CN |
102147898 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102495860 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103440571 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103635916 | Mar 2014 | CN |
1109121 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1953723 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2488976 | Sep 2012 | GB |
11136278 | May 1999 | JP |
H11184924 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001216427 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002157197 | May 2002 | JP |
2005316953 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2008152522 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009093503 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009223840 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010191864 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2014523585 | Sep 2014 | JP |
20020021748 | Mar 2002 | KR |
1020100113791 | Oct 2010 | KR |
2329538 | Jul 2008 | RU |
2015058604 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015170963 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016186834 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Multiple Calendar Management on Outlook2010—copying appointments. 2010, 4 pages. |
Outlook 2007 Tip: How to View Google Calendar inside Outlook 2007. 2007, by Shivaranjan. |
How to Sync Microsoft Outlook With Google Calendar, 2009, by Basu. |
Liu et al, “Meeting Runner: An Automatic Email-Based Meeting Scheduler,” Copyright 2002. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/041786 dated Dec. 28, 2012. |
Vitor R. Carvalho. Modeling Intention in Email. CMU-LTI-08-007. 2008. http://www.lti.cs.cmu.edu/Research/Thesis/VitorCarvalho_FinalVersion.pdf. |
Bilton. Reinventing E-Mail, One Message at a Time—The New York Times. Aug. 23,2010 http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/reinventing-e-mail-one-message-at-a-time/. |
Taiwo Ayodele, et al. Email Classification: Solution with Back Propagation Technique. 2009. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5402583. |
Symantec Enterprise Vault™ Intelligent Archiving and Email Classification, Retention, Filtering, and Search—Retrieved Date: Oct. 4, 2010 http://www.symantec.com/connect/sites/default/files/intelligent_archiving_and_email.pdf. |
Andrew Lampert et al., Detecting Emails Containing Requests for Action, Naacl 2010, pp. 984-992. |
Victoria Bellotti et al. Taking Email to Task: The Design and eEvaluation of a Task Management Centred Email Tool. In Computer Human Interaction Conference 2003, CHI, pp. 345-352, Ft Lauderdale, Florida. |
Vitor R. Carvalho et al. Improving “Email Speech Acts” Analysis via N-gram Selection. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2006—Workshop on Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech, pp. 35-41, New York. |
William W. Cohen. Learning to Classify Email into “Speech Acts”. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2004. pp. 309-316, Barcelona, Spain. |
Simon H. Corston-Oliver, et al. Task-focused Summarization of Email. In ACL-2004 Workshop: Text Summarization Branches Out, pp. 43-50. |
Andrew Lampert, et al. The Nature of Requests and Commitments in Email Messages. In Proceedings of EMAIL-2008: The AAAI Workshop on Enhanced Messaging, pp. 42-47, Chicago. |
Andrew Lampert, et al. Requests and Commitments in Email are More Complex Than You Think: Eight Reasons to be Cautious. In Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Workshop (ALTA 2008), pp. 55-63, Hobart, Australia. |
European Search Report for Application No. 12804978.0 dated Jan. 27, 2015. |
Chinese Second Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 201280031955.2, dated Aug. 1, 2016, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-518600”, dated May 12, 2016, 08 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280031955.2”, dated Feb. 24, 2016, 16 Pages. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 201280031955.2, dated Mar. 30, 2017, 16 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280031955.2”, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 13 Pages. |
Japanese Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-518600, dated Dec. 8, 2016, 3 Pages. |
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Patent Application 201280031955.2, dated Sep. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
Chinese Office Action in Patent Application 201280031955.2, dated Jul. 21, 2017, 13 pages. |
Corston-Oliver et al., “Integration of Email and Task Lists”, in the Proceedings of the 2004 Collaboration, Electronic messaging, Anti-Abuse and Span Conference, Jul. 2004, 2 pages. |
Corston-Oliver, et al., “Task-focused Summarization of Email”, In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop Text Summarization Branches Out, Jul. 2004, 9 pages. |
Horvitz, Eric, “Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces”, in the Proceedings of the 1999 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 1999, 9 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance in Application 2014-518600, dated Dec. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
Kalia, et al., “Identifying Business Tasks and Commitments from Email and Chat”, In Technical Report HPL-2013-4, Oct. 6, 2013, 22 pages. |
Lampert, et al., “Requests and Commitments in Email are More Complex Than You Think:Eight Reasons to be Cautious”, In Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Workshop, Dec. 8, 2008, 10 pages. |
PCT 2nd Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2016/028002, dated May 2, 2017, 9 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application PCT/US2016/028002, dated Jul. 31, 2017, 9 Pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2012/041786 dated Jan. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT PCT/US2016/028002, dated May 30, 2016, 15 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 14, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US16/030615, 12 Pages. |
Pennacchiotti, et al., “Automatically Building Training Examples for Entity Extraction”, Computational Natural Language Learning, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, Jun. 23, 2011, pp. 163-171. |
Torres-Moreno, “Automatic Text Summarization,” Chapter 6, Source and Domain Specific Summarization, Sep. 24, 2014, p. 215. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137, Amendment and Response filed May 8, 2017, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137, Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2017, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137, Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2017, 16 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7034644”, dated Mar. 7, 2018, 10 Pages. |
Colombian Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011540, dated Nov. 15, 2017, 3 Pages. |
Colombian Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011525, dated Nov. 15, 2017, 3 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137, Amendment and Response filed Dec. 15, 2017, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137, Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2018, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,109, Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2018, 12 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7034644”, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 4 Pages. (W/O English Translation). |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,109”, dated Aug. 16, 2018, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137”, dated Jun. 21, 2018, 18 Pages. |
Abraāo, et al., “A XBRL Financial Virtual Assistant”, In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, May 22, 2016, pp. 64-72. |
Kadhim, et al., “A Multi-intelligent Agent Architecture for Knowledge Extraction: Novel Approaches for Automatic Production Rules Extraction”, In International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, vol. 9, Issue 2, Mar. 2014, pp. 95-114. |
NC2017/0011525, “Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011525”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 24 Pages. |
NC2017/0011540, “Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011540”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 19 Pages. |
Schlaefer, et al., “Statistical Source Expansion for Question Answering”, In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management., 2009, 171 Pages. |
Signer, et al., “A Personal Assistant for Web Database Caching”, In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Jun. 5, 2000, 15 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137”, dated Oct. 5, 2018, 8 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,137”, dated Mar. 12, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201610319721.8”, dated Jan. 18, 2019, 11 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12804978.0”, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 2017/002832”, dated Mar. 14, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 2839-2017”, dated Mar. 14, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 16723208.1”, dated Jan. 8, 2019, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 2017/002832”, dated Nov. 19, 2018, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 201702839”, dated Nov. 14, 2018, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011525”, dated Nov. 20, 2018, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 254940”, dated Oct. 22, 2019, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 254940”, dated Oct. 23, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0011525”, dated Jun. 18, 2019, 16 Pages. (W/o English Translation). |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201610319721.8”, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 08 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 254939”, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 07 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Indonesian Patent Application No. P00201707977”, dated Aug. 21, 2019, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2017134261”, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 8 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/714,109”, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR112017022028-8”, dated Jun. 16, 2020, 5 Pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Issued in European Patent Application No. 12804978.0”, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 9 pages. |
“First Office Action arid Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201680028053.1”, dated Aug. 14, 2020, 16 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 736061”, dated Aug. 18, 2020, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-559498”, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 736061”, dated Jan. 14, 2021, 3 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201680028053.1”, dated Jan. 5, 2021, 9 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 201717038980”, dated Jan. 28, 2021, 9 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2017/014609”, dated Aug. 20, 2020, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 736061”, dated Nov. 3, 2020, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Australia Patent Application No. 2016265257”, dated Feb. 18, 2021, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 736061”, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 4 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130007648 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |