Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates generally to software used for modeling and designing interior or exterior spaces.

2. Background and Relevant Art

As computerized systems have increased in popularity, so has the range of applications that incorporate computational technology. For example, architects and interior designers (or “designers”) use a wide range of design software for designing the aesthetic as well as functional aspects of a given residential or commercial space. While conventional software design programs (e.g., computer-aided design or CAD programs) offer significant benefits over rudimentary drafting, they still nonetheless present various drawbacks.

For instance, conventional software design programs typically require a designer to place components in a specific order, generally one component at a time, or in a linear repetition of product assemblies. This can lead to various inefficiencies if the designer desires to change or modify a design layout. For example, if a designer desires to resize, change product lines, connect separate assemblies, or otherwise reconfigure a design space, conventional software programs require the designer to manually remove and replace the individual components and connectors. One will appreciate that this process is time consuming and does not leverage any pre-work performed earlier in the design phase.

Additionally, conventional design software typically has no little if any product intelligence. In most cases, for example, the designer needs to provide information regarding which products may be used together, how those products behave together, and which connection components are required to secure the products together. This often means that the designer needs to remember every part and piece related to the products placed in the context of the layout. Thus, the accuracy, speed of layout creation, and validity of layouts designed using conventional design software are typically dependent upon the skill of the designer.

One will appreciate that conventional design software's dependency upon the skill of the designer can lead to various mistakes and inefficiencies. For example, typical design software can allow spaces to be fairly configurable to suit the designer's design intent without specific regard in many cases to whether the design will actually function or contain all of the necessary parts and components. One will appreciate that even product experts can err when attempting to remember all aspects of any particular component, and can fail to remember or identify a component's relationships with respect to other parts of the layout. For example, a designer may forget to include some of the connection components needed to attach two products together or even use improper connection components.

One of the problems with many conventional design software programs that can lead to the design of physically or functionally impractical structures, is that many such design software programs allow for design only within a space in flat, two-dimensional space or plan view. One will appreciate that because plan views emphasize primarily only length and width from above, the designer will either need to independently visualize the vertical relationship between components, or will need to perform a separate three-dimensional rendering of the design, if the software allows for such. Indeed, conventional design software typically requires the designer to manually enter in the exact vertical coordinates at which a component is to be placed. This often leads to a designer placing components at incorrect vertical heights, or even vertically overlapping components.

To compound this drawback, the designer will often not detect the vertical misplacement of components until after completing the design. For example, the designer may use another program to produce a three-dimensional rendering of a completed design layout. Upon reviewing the three-dimensional rendering of the design layout, the designer may discover the vertically misplaced components. Conventional design software typically requires changes to the design layout or changes in component selection and placement to be made manually, which often results in a complete rework to ensure the designer captures all of the needed changes. For example, changing existing design layouts can involve not only the manual placement of components, but also various considerations related to the changing of the walls, furniture, or other design components.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Implementations of the present invention overcome one or more problems in the art with systems, methods, and computer program products configured to increase the accuracy, speed of creation, and validity of design layouts, while also reducing dependency upon the skill of the user. For example, one or more implementations of the present invention interpret the starting point and direction of user input to select and configure an interconnection type between components in the design space, and automatically populate all applicable connectors and bracketry. Furthermore, implementations of the present invention automatically associate product parameters and attributes to design components, including all applicable connectors, rules, features, characteristics, and behaviors. Based upon the components and their associated attributes and parameters, implementations of the present invention can automatically constrain at least the vertical positioning of components within a design space.

For example, in accordance with an implementation of the present invention a method of automatically configuring and capturing a user's design intent regarding the layout of furniture components within a design space based on one or more user gestures can involve identifying the placement of a first furniture component within a design space. The method can further involve receiving an initial user input indicating at least one drawing start point. Also, the method can involve receiving a subsequent user input indicating a drawing direction from the at least one drawing start point. Additionally, the method can involve placing an additional furniture component within the design space at a location based upon the position of the at least one drawing start point and the drawing direction. Furthermore, the method can involve automatically configuring an interconnection type between the first furniture component and the additional furniture component based upon the position of the at least one drawing start point and the drawing direction.

Additionally, a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention of automatically configuring user input in a computerized environment to automatically positioning a user's design two-dimensional design choices of furniture components in an appropriate vertical layout within a design space can involve receiving user input regarding the placement of one or more furniture components at a first lateral position and a first longitudinal position within a design space. The method can also involve identifying one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the one or more furniture components. The method can additionally involve receiving user input regarding the placement of an additional furniture component at the first lateral position and the first longitudinal position within the design space.

The method can further involve identifying one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the additional furniture component. Additionally, the method can involve constraining the vertical position of the additional furniture component based at least partially upon the one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the additional furniture component and the one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the one or more furniture components.

In addition to the foregoing, a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention of automatically resolving user input with respect to furniture components in a design space so that the furniture components are accurately depicted, arranged, and associated with appropriate assembly components can involve identifying the placement of a furniture component within a design space. The method can also involve displaying one or more grips about the furniture component. Furthermore, the method can involve receiving user input regarding the movement of the one or more grips from a default location to a new location. Additionally, the method can involve automatically resolving the furniture component by modifying a dimension of the furniture component to reflect a design intent indicated by the movement of the one or more grips. Furthermore, the method can involve automatically modifying one or more design components adjacent to the furniture component.

Additional features and advantages of exemplary implementations of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of such exemplary implementations. The features and advantages of such implementations may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of such exemplary implementations as set forth hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the invention can be obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. One will appreciate that elements of similar structures or functions are generally represented by like reference numerals for illustrative purposes throughout the Figures. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1A illustrates a conceptual diagram of a user interface and one or more components of a design software program when a user enters input into a design space in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 1B illustrates a conceptual diagram of the user interface of FIG. 1A in which the design software program interprets user input to select and configure an interconnection type between components in the design space in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 1C illustrates a conceptual diagram of the user interface of FIG. 1A in which the design software program interprets user input to select and configure another interconnection type between components in the design space in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 1D illustrates a conceptual diagram of the user interface of FIG. 1C in which the design software program automatically constrains the vertical position of one or more components within the design space in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 1E illustrates a conceptual diagram of a three-dimensional user interface including a three-dimensional representation of the design space and components of the user interface of FIG. 1D;

FIG. 2A illustrates a conceptual diagram of a user interface and one or more components of a design software program when a user enters input into a design space to modify one or more of the components in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 2B illustrates a conceptual diagram of the user interface of FIG. 2A in which the design software program automatically resolves each component in the design space based on user input in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 2C illustrates a conceptual diagram of the user interface of FIG. 2B when a user enters input into a design space to make changes to one or more components in an original assembly and the design software automatically populates similar changes to one or more components in a reference assembly in accordance with an implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of a series of acts in a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention of interpreting user input to select and configure an interconnection type between components in a design space;

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart of a series of acts in a method in accordance with another implementation of the present invention of automatically constraining the vertical positioning of components within a design space; and

FIG. 5 illustrates a flowchart of a series of acts in a method in accordance with yet another implementation of the present invention of modifying the dimensions of a design component within a design space.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention extends to systems, methods, and computer program products configured to increase the accuracy, speed of creation, and validity of design layouts, while also reducing dependency upon the skill of the user. For example, one or more implementations of the present invention interpret the starting point and direction of user input to select and configure an interconnection type between components in the design space, and automatically populate all applicable connectors and bracketry. Furthermore, implementations of the present invention automatically associate product parameters and attributes to design components, including all applicable connectors, rules, features, characteristics, and behaviors. Based upon the components and their associated attributes and parameters, implementations of the present invention can automatically constrain at least the vertical positioning of components within a design space.

One will thus appreciate that because the systems, methods, and computer program products of the present invention include design components that include associated product attributes and parameters, a non-expert can easily and efficiently create accurate, complete furniture design layouts. Furthermore, implementations of the present invention can apply rules and behaviors and interpret design intent automatically, not only providing an accurate layout, but also allowing change at any time without rework. Implementations of the present invention can also recognize required changes effected by user driven changes, and automatically resolve the design layout, including required component substitutions and dimensional changes, to help maintain validity.

Along similar lines, one or more implementations of the present invention provide software that can recognize required changes affected by the user-driven change, and re-solve the layout design to automatically include required component additions, component substitutions, and/or dimensional changes effected by the user driven design change. The design software system can change product types (e.g., from one furniture product line to another, with its own set of independent behaviors and product rules), and resolve to the new product and its relative behaviors and rules. An auto-solve function in the design software system can identify areas of conflict in the design and either solve the conflicts automatically, or provide choices for the correction. The design software system can also implement the selected solution automatically (e.g., once the end-user has made a choice).

The design software system can align related components, such as work-surfaces and wall panel dividers, on-module or along matching seams. A user can align components generally designed in the default layout condition, or off-module (staggered seams), by highlighting the component and moving a grip. The user can move the grip in any direction within the behavior and rule constraints of the product, allowing the seam placement apart from the seams of the other component types where allowed by product behavior and rules. For auto-layout functionality, the design software system can set particular components (e.g., work surface) to drive the dimensions of adjacent components (e.g., wall panel divider segments) or vice versa. In this manner, the user can determine which component is most important to the design, and the design software system will resize related components accordingly.

Generally, a user can create layouts in a two-dimensional plan view, although users need not work in a linear sequential manner. In most cases, the user is free to design in any manner they wish, and the design software system will understand the design intent and resolve the design accordingly. Additionally, implementations of the present invention can represent the design space in three-dimensional graphics. Thus, a user can easily and quickly toggle between different views or representations to gain a complete understanding of the design space and design components therein. The design software system can create each of these separate views using the same dataset. Thus, one will appreciate that implementations of the present invention can eliminate the need to audit between information sources. Furthermore, because each representation can be based on the same dataset, the design software system can instantly and simultaneously resolve and modify all representations.

Furthermore, through the use of an object-oriented programming language (e.g., Java), the design software system can create programming objects for each component, attribute, option, relationship, and behavior. The design software system can store these objects within a single data structure. Additionally, the design software system can cause each object, in turn, to resolve itself in the design. The design software system can thus appropriately propagate user input at any level of this dataset to all objects in the data structure, thereby resolving the complete design through the resolving of each object individually. In addition, implementations of the present invention can include a solution level programming object, which recognizes behaviors and relationships between objects within the design. As also discussed above, the solution-level programming object can also resolve itself with each user input.

In particular, at any time before, during, or after design layout of any componentry, a user can open a separate three-dimensional interface (or textual interface, such as a Bill of Materials, Order Proposal, reports, etc.). Upon the opening of such an interface (and dynamically in unison with additional user input), the physical component objects can be automatically represented by three-dimensional views, and/or via a textual depiction in the appropriate interface. These interfaces update accordingly with each user input, as each component resolves itself. Other non-physical component objects (e.g., a product price) will also resolve themselves in accordance with related objects, and may or may not be represented in one or more of the graphical or textual interfaces.

As mentioned above, implementations of the present invention can allow non-expert users to efficiently, quickly, and accurately design a layout within a design space. Implementations of the present invention provide specific functionality for furniture system type (or similar) layout design. One will appreciate, however, that a user can use the systems, methods, and computer product programs of the present invention to create layouts of other design components, such as for example, structural building components and functional building systems.

In at least one implementation, the system, methods, and computer products of the present invention allow a user to select various design components from a product menu, which the user can then add to a design space. One will appreciate that a user can also select the design components from a product menu, or the user can import them into the design software system from another software program. For example, FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary user interface 100 for a design software system in accordance with an implementation of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1A, the user interface 100 can comprise a plan view interface defined by a lateral or “x” direction and a longitudinal or “y” direction. One will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein, that this is just one example of a user interface of the present invention. For example, additional or alternative implementations of the present invention can include three-dimensional interfaces (FIG. 1E) and textual interfaces.

As shown in FIG. 1A, the user interface 100 can provide a user with a selection portion or toolbar 102 with a list of images or icons (e.g., 104, 106). The icons can represent components, connectors, assemblies, etc. that a user can add to a design space. The icons can represent items that the user can place in a design space 110 portion of the user interface 100. In at least one implementation, the icon is a symbol representing the item. In alternative implementations, the icon can include an image associated with the item. Thus, the icons 104, 106 can provide the user with some initial information about the components, connectors, assemblies, etc. that the user can add to the design space 110.

Of course, the options provided to the user are not limited to the icons shown, necessarily. For example, the design software system can provide the user with other options (not shown) as part of the design program for modifying or replacing the type of component, connector, assembly, etc. In particular, the user may make choices to change the color, material, size, texture, thickness, and so forth of the components, connectors, assemblies, etc. Additionally, the user can change make choices to change or replace the component, connector or assembly in its entirety.

As mentioned previously, one or more implementations of the present invention can help increase the accuracy and creation speed of design layouts. For example, in addition to drawing or adding individual components (wall dividers, cabinets, work surfaces, etc.) to the design space 110, a user can add assemblies and subassemblies of components. For example, FIG. 1A shows that the user selects the icon 104 representing a wall panel divider with work surfaces on both sides. The design software system can treat this product or combination of products as an “idea starter,” or set of basic default component(s). The design software system can modify the default components to the user's specific requirements later, or can otherwise leave the default components as selected. For example, as mentioned the user can choose an icon 104 representing a double-sided, rectangular work-surface with a fabric covered divider panel. The user can change the work-surface substrate, size, shape, or finish any time later, along with the height, type or finish of the divider panel. Of course, in at least one implementation, the design software system can apply the defaults inherent to the selected product type when in the initial layout.

Once the icon and associated product type is selected, the user can draw a single line to represent a length, or run, of the product. For example, FIG. 1A illustrates that the user draws a line from point “a” to point “b.” Once the user draws the line, the design software system can automatically populate the associated product(s) and component(s). For example, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, the design software system can automatically populate a product assembly 112a including wall dividers 120 and work surfaces 122, on both sides thereof. The design software system can also automatically populate all necessary connectors and bracketry to connect and support the components of the product assembly. Thus, FIG. 1A shows that the design software system can generate the necessary brackets 124 and end supports 126 to connect and support the product assembly 112a.

One will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that the capability to draw or introduce an entire product assembly 112a to the design space 110 can increase the speed at which a user can create a design layout. For example, the user need not create each individual component in a linear fashion (i.e., first place a panel divider, then bracketry, then work surfaces). Furthermore, the ability to create an entire product assembly 112a can reduce or eliminate the need for a user to know how individual parts and components (i.e., work surfaces 122 and panel dividers 120) interrelate, and which connectors and bracketry (i.e., brackets 124 and end supports 126) are needed to connect and support the components of the product assembly 112a.

In addition or alternatively, the user can import the design components/assemblies into the design space 110 from a separate software program, such as for example, a CAD program. According to some implementations of the present invention, the design components can be resolvable software objects (as used in object-oriented programming). As part of importing design components/assemblies into the design space 110 from a separate software program, implementations of the present invention can provide one or more mechanisms for automatically and instantly rendering record-based data (e.g., linear or sequential database entries representing graphical entities in a computer-aided drawing/design (or CAD application, as well as correlating such data to detailed, object-oriented entities (or “intelligent software objects”). This translation/rendering/linking/correlating can be accomplished and mediated at least in part through the use of one or more intermediate interface components configured to correlate record-based changes with object entities in an object-oriented database.

In either case, as the user enters input corresponding to the placement or importation of the product assembly 112a into the design space 110, the design software system can receive the input and identify the components. In particular, the design software system can identify each component's location, type, size, relationships to other components, etc. Upon identification of the components, the design software system can create intelligent, automatically resolvable objects for each component that includes one or more attributes and product parameters. For example, FIG. 1A illustrates an object database 115 comprising objects for each design component and assembly (e.g., 120, 122, 124, 126, 112a) in the design space 110.

The design software system can create and compile such objects in virtually any object-oriented programming language, including, for example, an object-oriented programming language such as the JAVA programming language. No matter how created, the design software system can store the objects within a single data structure, and resolve each object (where applicable) in the design to conform to the given design intent. The design software system can thus appropriately propagate user input at any level of this dataset to all objects in the data structure consistent with the design intent, thereby resolving the complete design through the resolving of each object individually. These programming objects can include components (e.g., 120, 122) as well as product assemblies 112a.

As mentioned above, each object in the object database 115 can include one or more attributes and product parameters, or reference to one or more databases comprising information of the same. Attributes can include product features and characteristics, such as, for example, size, shape, color, type, texture, price, material composition, etc. Product parameters can include rules and behaviors associated with each component. For example, the rules and behaviors can include the type and number of connectors and bracketry need to support each component or assembly, how the components and assemblies interact with other design elements, applicable codes, manufacturing guidelines, and physical limitations.

Based on the product attributes and parameters associated with each component and assembly, the design software system can aid a user in the creation of a design layout that is both complete and accurate. For example, the design software system can constrain the length of the product assembly 112a to correspond with the limitations of the actual product to be manufactured and installed. If the product components can be manufactured parametrically in nature (e.g., to any dimensional value), the design software system will allow the user to draw the line representing product assembly 112a to any length.

On the other hand, if the product components are incremental in nature, such as available in 6″ increments only, the design software system will only allow the user to draw the line representing the product assembly 112a to lengths of 6″ increments. In such a case, a line longer than 6″ may represent many adjacent modules of the selected product. For example, even though a work-surface product may not be manufactured longer than 48″ the user can draw a line of any length, and the design software system will repeat and connect modules of the product together, as shown in FIG. 1A.

As mentioned previously, implementations of the present invention can aid a user in the creation of a complete and accurate design layout by interpreting user input indicating a user's design intent for an interconnection type between design components, and automatically populating the interconnection between design components. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that a user can select icon 104 and draw a line to represent a length, or run, of the product. For example, FIG. 1A illustrates that the user draws a line from a drawing start point “c,” along a drawing direction, to point “d.” The design software system automatically populates the product assembly 112b, including a wall dividers 120 and work surfaces 122 on both sides thereof. The design software system also automatically populates all the necessary connectors and bracketry to connect the product assembly 112b. Thus, FIG. 1B shows that the design software system generates the necessary brackets 124 and end supports 126 to connect and support the components of the product assembly 112b. The design software system also automatically creates and associates objects including attributes and product parameters with each of the components of the additional product assembly 112b.

Furthermore, based on the position of the drawing start point and the drawing direction, the design software system can automatically determine which type of interconnection to generate between the product assembly 112a and the new product assembly 112b. For instance, FIG. 1B illustrates that the user selects a drawing start point “c” adjacent the lateral most edge of work surface component 122a and indicates a drawing direction toward point “d” (in this case a rightward direction). Based on this positioning of the drawing start point and the drawing direction, the design software system automatically generates an “L-corner” joint or interconnection between the product assembly 112a and the newly added product assembly 112b. As shown in FIG. 1B, the L-corner interconnection can include an abutment of work surfaces of the product assembly 112a and the newly added product assembly 112b in an “L” configuration with applicable connectors, bracketry, and supports.

As part of generating the L-corner interconnection, the design software system, can automatically add, remove, or modify the parts and components of one or both of the product assembly 112a and the additional product assembly 112b to facilitate the generation of the interconnection type. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that design software program can automatically shorten the length or run of the panel divider 120a, and can automatically divide the work surface 122a into two separate components. This allows the generation of an L-corner interconnection between the product assembly 112a and the additional product assembly 112b.

Furthermore, the modifications to the panel divider 120a and the work surface 122a also help maintain the user's design intent of having a panel divider with work surfaces on both sides. In addition to automatically adding, removing, or modifying design components to facilitate the generation of the interconnection type, the design software system can also automatically populate any necessary connectors and bracketry to form the interconnection. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software system automatically populates brackets 124 between the work surfaces 122 of the product assembly 112a and the additional product assembly 112b.

As mentioned previously, the type of interconnection generated by design software system can be dependent upon certain user “gestures,” representing input indicating a drawings start point and a drawing direction. For example, FIG. 1C illustrates that a user draws a line (or “gestures”) in such a way that flows from drawing start point “e” near the center of the product assembly 112a towards point “d” (or downward in this example). Based on this positioning of the drawing start point and the drawing direction, the design software system automatically identifies the particular gesture, and generates an angled corner interconnection between the product assembly 112a and the newly added product assembly 112c. As shown in FIG. 1C, the angled corner interconnection can include an angled corned work surface 128 with applicable connectors, bracketry, and supports.

In the illustrated case, the user's gesture including the placement of the drawing starting point “e” and downward gesture toward point “d” causes the design software system to automatically add a rounded corner work surface 129 and an angled corner work surface 128 to facilitate the angled interconnection between the product assembly 112a and the product assembly 112c. In addition, and as previously discussed with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1B, the design software system can also automatically populate any necessary connectors and bracketry to form the interconnection using the user's gesture in FIG. 1C. For example, FIG. 1C illustrates that the design software system automatically populates brackets 124 between the work surfaces 122 of the product assembly 112a and the additional product assembly 112c.

One will appreciate that design software system's ability to generate various interconnection types between design components based upon the gesturing of user input (i.e., positioning of a drawing start point and drawing direction) can increase the speed at which a user can create a design layout. For example, the user need not remove and add the necessary individual components in a linear fashion to create the interconnection. Furthermore, the ability to create generate various interconnections based on user input can reduce or eliminate the need for a user to know how individual parts and components inter-relate, and which connectors and bracketry are needed to form a particular type of interconnection between design components. By reducing or eliminating some dependency upon a user, the design software system can reduce or eliminate at least some human error and help ensure that design layouts are accurate. Additionally, by having the type of interconnection based upon the gesturing of user input, the design software system can help ensure that a user's design intent is maintained.

One or more implementations of the present invention can also help increase the accuracy, speed of creation, and validity of furniture design layouts by constraining the vertical positioning of design components. (This is in contrast to conventional software that can require a user to input the exact vertical coordinates of each design component.) By associating attributes and product parameters with each design component and assembly, implementations of the present invention can constrain the vertical placement of design components to valid locations. This can reduce the need for the user to know exact vertical coordinates for each design component added to the design space. One will appreciate that this can help increase speed and accuracy of design layouts and reduce human error.

For example, FIG. 1D illustrates that a user can select an overhead cabinet icon 130 from the toolbar 102. The user can then indicate the lateral and longitudinal position of an overhead cabinet 130a within the design space 110. In the implementation illustrated in FIG. 1D, the user selects and places the overhead cabinet 130a at the same lateral and longitudinal position as the work surface 122d of the product assembly 112c. Based upon one or more attributes and product parameters associated with one or more of the overhead cabinet 130a, work surface 122d, the panel divider 120d, and the product assembly 112c stored within the object database 115, the design software system can constrain the vertical positioning of the overhead cabinet 130a to an appropriate, real-world location.

In particular, the attributes and product parameters associated with the overhead cabinet 130a, work surface 122d, the panel divider 120d, and the product assembly 112c can dictate which vertical positions are allowed or feasible when an overhead cabinet 130a is combined with a product assembly 112c. For instance, according to some implementations of the present invention, the design software system can constrain the overhead cabinet 130a reference copies to a single vertical position with the top of the overhead cabinet 130a being flush with the top of the panel divider 120d. In such cases, the design software system can automatically place the overhead cabinet 130a in the allowed vertical position.

According to other implementations of the present invention, the attributes and product parameters associated with the overhead cabinet 130a, work surface 122d, and the product assembly 112c may dictate two or more possible vertical locations for the overhead cabinet 130a (e.g., midway up the panel divider 120d or flush with the top of the panel divider 120d). In such situations where there is no one single valid solution without further user input, the design software system can place the component in a default position (or one of several applicable positions), or provide an auto-solve function. For example, the design software system can generate a warning notification, offering all possible solutions.

Furthermore, where a specific solution has been selected multiple times, the specific solution has been set as a preferred solution, or a specific solution is preferred due to cost, installation ease, etc., the design software system can provide it as a default solution. For instance, if a user has selected the option to place various overhead cabinets 130a flush with their respective panel dividers 120, the next time the user places an additional overhead cabinet 130a, the design software system can automatically place the additional overhead cabinet 130a flush with its respective panel divider 120. The design software system can then prompt the user to accept this change, or view additional possible alternative solutions. One will appreciate that the design software system can provide an auto-solve function not only when constraining the vertical placement of design components within the design space 110, but also with any design decision or change that requires user input or the selection between multiple possible solutions.

Additionally, one will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that upon the introduction of a new design component within the design space 110, such as overhead cabinet 130a, each component in the design space can automatically resolve itself. For example, upon completion of a line or placement of a component, the design software system can automatically apply default attributes, parameters, and options to all of the component(s). If the user introduces additional components to the existing design, each of the intelligent software objects (including objects for both original components and newly introduced components) automatically resolve themselves (or themselves in conjunction with resolution of other related software objects) in the design, providing a continuously resolved solution at all times. In particular, if the user places the overhead cabinet 130a on a panel divider 120d a cantilever support on the work surface below may not provide enough stability for the complete assembly. In such instances the design software system can automatically introduce a C-shaped support from work surface 120d to floor or similar type support beneath the work surface 120d to support the extra weight of the overhead cabinet 130a and its potential contents. Furthermore, all of the other design components within the design space 110 can similarly automatically resolve themselves. For instance, the design software program can automatically reposition or resize the panel dividers 120, connectors, etc. adjacent panel divider 120d to accommodate the C-shaped support

In addition, the design software system can further comprise one or more pre-solve functions, which can provide a user feedback pro-actively, such as when the design is being created. One will appreciate that the pre-solve function can communicate options available, which are related to the user's design modifications. For example, when the user adds an overhead cabinet or makes another change that requires the modification of the size of a panel divider or other component, the design software system can recognize as much and communicate this back to the user. In such cases, the design software system can recognize that either the adjacent components need to change in size, or stay the same size and move in unison with the changing component.

According to some implementations of the present invention, if the user wishes the adjacent items to resize, the user may not need to take further action. For example, the design software system can recognize resizing of adjacent components as a default. In such cases, the design software system can produce a warning containing an indication of both solutions (i.e., resizing and repositioning), and bold the default solution. According to some implementations of the present invention, the user can enter input to select the default solution (e.g., press the enter key or the R key to resize adjacent and subsequent components). If the user prefers the adjacent and subsequent components to move, the user can select the non-default solution by holding down a particular key (e.g., the M key to move adjacent components), to enact the movement function or provide some other type of user input.

While the interface 100 shown in FIGS. 1A-1D is generally a two-dimensional (“2D”) plan view interface, the design software system can also represent components in a three-dimensional (“3D”) interface, in which the user or the design software system can place design components and make other changes to the design space directly. For example, the present invention can include additional and alternative systems and methods for displaying automatically resolved user input in two or more dimensional views in a realistic manner.

Specifically, the design software can automatically implement changes made in a two-dimensional interface to the views in a three-dimensional interface. This is possible at least in part since all interfaces of the software can utilize the same database, and further since the system has already previously rendered image information associated with each component that the user selects within the interface 100. As such, the design software system can represent a single dataset as two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphical representations instantly and interchangeably.

For example, FIG. 1E illustrates a 3D graphical interface 114 corresponding to the 2D graphical interface 100 illustrated by FIG. 1D. Upon the opening of the 3D interface (and dynamically in unison with additional user input) the system can automatically represent the design components in 3D depiction. For example, FIG. 1E illustrates that the 3D interface 114 illustrates the product assemblies 112a, 112c created in the 2D interface 100 in a 3D rendering.

One will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that a user can make changes directly in the 3D interface 114 (this is in contrast to conventional 3D rendering programs that only allow for modification in a plan view). For example, FIG. 1E illustrates that a user selects the icon 132 representing a file cabinet and indicates a desired position of a file cabinet 132a below the work surface 122d. Upon receiving such user input, the design software system can automatically generate the file cabinet 132a in the 3D interface 114 as shown in FIG. 1E. One will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that the 2D and 3D interfaces can update accordingly with each user input, as each design component automatically resolves itself. For instance, the design software system can automatically create and resolve file cabinet 132a created in the 3D interface 114 in the 2D interface 100. As a result, auditing between the various outputs may not ordinarily be required. Rather, validation of the design in one view confirms accuracy of the design in the other views as well.

Additionally, at any time before, during, or after design layout of any componentry, a user can open a separate textual interface (a Bill of Materials, Order Proposal, parts list, reports, etc.). The software system can further automatically maintain an ongoing, accurate parts list that lists each design component, each connector and bracket included in a design layout. Thus, the user can have confidence that, should they submit an order for the three-dimensional design the user has just made, that all diagrams, dimensions, and components submitted to any entity with the order will be appropriate.

For example, implementations of the present invention can include additional and alternative systems and methods for the continual generation of an accurate parts list along with the user input, which the software system can display in a parts list interface, and which does not need further review for correction or additional parts before ordering. In addition to the components, modules, and mechanisms described herein above, implementations of the present invention can include additional or alternative components, modules, and mechanisms to help increase the accuracy, speed of creation, and validity of furniture design layouts. For example, each design component can include grips that allow a user to manipulate, change, or modify the dimensions and/or shape of a design component. The use of the grips is described herein below with reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B.

For example, FIG. 2A illustrates a product assembly 116a comprising panel dividers 120 and work surfaces 122 secured to one side thereof. One will appreciate the user can create the product assembly 116a by selecting the icon 106, and drawing a line in a manner similar to that previously described in reference to the product assembly 112a shown and described in relation to FIG. 1A. As shown in FIG. 2A, the design software system can automatically populate the panel dividers 120 and the work surfaces 122 with default dimensions and shapes.

FIG. 2A also illustrates that the design software system can display grips 150 associated with work surfaces 122e and 122f. One will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that the design software system can display grips 150 for each component within the design space 110, or one which a user highlights or selects. As shown in FIG. 2A, grips 150 can comprise boxes or other icons or symbols placed around the outer edges of a component. A user can highlight or select a grip 150 and move it to modify the shape or dimension of at least a portion of the component, as described in greater detail below. The design software system can display grips 150 in the 2D interface 110 as shown in FIG. 2A. Additionally, one will appreciate that the design software system can also display grips 150 in the 3D interface 114.

FIG. 2A does not illustrate any brackets connecting the work surfaces 122 to aid in depiction of the grips 150. As shown in FIG. 2A, to modify the dimension and/or shape of a design component, a user can manipulate or move one or more grips 150 associated with each design component. For example, FIG. 2A illustrates that a user moves grip 150a associated with work surface 122e from a default position “f” to a new position “g.”

Upon receiving the user input moving the grip 150a, the design software system can automatically resolve the work surface 122e to reflect the user's design intent. For example, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system can automatically modify the dimensions and shape of the work surface 122e to comprise a wave work surface reflecting the repositioning of the grip 150a. Furthermore, the design software system can automatically resolve and make any necessary connector and bracketry changes to support the change of the work surface 122e. For example, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system automatically replaces the end support connected to the work surface 122e with an end support 126a having increased length.

FIGS. 2A and 2B also illustrate that user can change the dimension of one or more components at any time. Specifically, the user can keep the components on-module with related components, or off-module (non-aligning seams) as shown. In other words, the user can request that the design software system to ensure that all components remain aligned along seams with adjacent components (on-module), or allow a user to modify the dimensions of a design component so it is not aligned with seams of an adjacent component (off-module). For example, FIG. 2A illustrates that each of the work surfaces 122 are on-module or aligned with the seams of each of the panel dividers 120.

When in an off-module mode, the design software program allows the user to change the dimensions of a work surface 122f so it is not aligned with the seams of adjacent panel dividers 120. For example FIG. 2A illustrates that a user moves a grip 150b associated with work surface 122f from a default position “h” to a new position “i.” FIG. 2B illustrates that upon receiving this user input, the design software system automatically modifies the dimension of the work surface 122f by increasing its length. Furthermore, FIG. 2B shows that the right edge of the work surface 122f is no longer aligned with the seam 124 between the panel dividers 120e and 120f.

According to some implementations of the present invention, adjacent components affected by the user-driven change can be updated automatically, changing dimensionally to accommodate the user's modification while maintaining the overall drawn line dimension. (By contrast, some conventional programs can require the discarding and replacement of both work-surface components, rather than the simple modification of one.) For example, FIG. 2B shows that the design software system can automatically shorten the length of the work surface 122g to accommodate the increased length of the work surface 122f.

Additionally, in the event off-module applications may require different support bracketry between the work-surface and the panel divider, implementations of the present invention can resolve the relationships and place correct bracketry where required, such as previously described herein. (By contrast, some conventional software programs can require the human user to replace or change out any hardware or connectors manually.) For example, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software program automatically inserts a cantilever support 127 to support the modified work surfaces 122f and 122g.

One or more implementations of the present invention also allow for a user to copy and/or mirror design components and/or product assemblies. For example, FIG. 2C illustrates that upon receiving user input, the design software system can automatically create a mirrored copy 116b of the product assembly 116a. As shown in FIG. 2C, the mirrored copy 116b can include mirrored individual components, such as, a mirrored copy 122h of the wave work surface 122e. In addition, the design software system can automate design change resolution to the extent that the design software system can recognize duplicate components, and merge them within the design and related documentation such as a Bill of Materials. For example, FIG. 2C illustrates that when the product assembly 116b is abutted against the product assembly 116a, the design software program recognizes the intent of the single set of panel dividers with work-surfaces on either side. In response, the design software system automatically removes one set of panel dividers, and thus merges the designs. In other words, as illustrated in FIG. 2C, the design software system automatically removes the redundant panel dividers 120.

Additionally, implementations of the present invention can allow for the re-creation of reference copies from an original layout, in order to speed change of large furniture layouts. For example, the user can copy an original grouping and past multiple reference copies. When the user makes changes to the original, the design software system can update all reference copies in unison. The user can break the link between the original and reference at any time, allowing for customization of specific groupings where required. For example, in FIG. 2C the user copies product assemblies 116a and 116b to create product assembly 116c. The user designates the product assembly 116c as a reference copy of the combination of product assemblies 116a, 116b. FIG. 2C further illustrates when a user selects and adds an overhead cabinet 130c to the combination of product assemblies 116a, 116b, the design software system automatically adds a corresponding overhead cabinet 130d to the reference product assembly 116c.

Implementations of the present invention can also allow the conversion of a design from one product line to another, and to resolve all components, behaviors, and relationships to the design, in relation to the newly selected product line. For example, although Product A and Product B may be similar in nature, they may have differing dimensional constraints, interconnection types, available finishes, etc. Similarly, Product A may even be parametric and Product B may be incremental. Even though a design layout is created in Product A, if the user wishes to change to Product B (either for a known requirement for the change for simply to explore cost or other ramifications of the product line change) the user can make the change without additional rework. Upon receiving user input requesting the change of a design from one product line to another, the design software system can automatically resolve the design and update all databases and representations (e.g., 2D, 3D, textual). In particular, the design software program can consider the underlying design lines as a schematic layout, no matter which product is represented by the lines themselves, and thus provide system change without rework of the design.

Accordingly, FIGS. 1A-2C and the corresponding text illustrate or describe a number of components, modules, and mechanisms that can enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and speed with which a user can create a design layout. Along similar lines the components, modules, and mechanisms described above in relation to FIGS. 1A-2C can also reduce the knowledge needed by a user to create an accurate and complete design layout. In addition to the foregoing, implementations of the present invention can also be described in terms of one or more acts in a method for accomplishing a particular result. For example, FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 illustrate flowcharts of computer-implemented methods of creating design layouts based on user input. The acts of these flowcharts are described below with respect to the components and diagrams of FIGS. 1A-2C.

For example, FIG. 3 shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 300 of identifying the placement of a first furniture component within a design space. Act 300 can involve identifying the placement of a first furniture component added to the design space by the user from a menu or toolbar, or identifying a first furniture component imported into the design space from another software program. For example, FIG. 1A illustrates that the design software program identifies the placement of a first furniture component (i.e., product assembly 112a) as a user selects icon 104 and draws the product assembly 112a within the design space 110 of the interface 100. One will appreciate that the first furniture component need not be a product assembly 112a, but can be an individual component, such as, for example, a wall divider, a work surface, a bracket or other connector, a chair, a table, etc.

FIG. 3 also shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 310 of receiving an initial user input indicating at least one drawing start point. Act 310 can involve receiving input from a user that corresponds to placing, repositioning, or changing of a drawing starting point within the design space. For example, FIG. 1B shows the interface 100 of the design software program receives user input indicating the position of a drawing start point at position “c” along the edge of the product assembly 112a. Similarly, FIG. 1C shows that the interface 100 of the design software program receives user input indicating the position of a drawing start point at position “e” within the center of the product assembly 112a. One will appreciate that the method can also involve receiving user input regarding the selection of a furniture component prior to, or in tandem with, act 310. For example, both FIGS. 1B and 1C show that the interface 100 of the design software program receives user input regarding the section of icon 104 associated with a panel divider and two work surfaces.

In addition, FIG. 3 shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 320 of receiving a subsequent user input indicating a drawing direction from the at least one drawing start point. Act 320 can involve receiving user input indicating the direction along which the user desires to place an additional furniture component within the design space. For example, FIGS. 1B and 1C illustrates that the interface 100 of the design software program receives user input regarding a drawing direction from the at least one drawing start point (points “c” and “e” respectively) generally in a direction perpendicular to the product assembly 112a.

Additionally, act 320 can involve receiving user input indicating a desired length or run of the additional furniture component. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the interface of the design software program receives user input regarding a desired length or run from point “c” to point “d.” One will appreciate that the design software system can constrain the distance from point “c” to point “d” based upon the attributes and parameters associated with the selected furniture component as described in greater detail hereinabove.

Furthermore, FIG. 3 shows that the method can comprise an act 330 of placing an additional furniture component within the design space at a location based upon the position of the at least one drawing start point and the drawing direction. Act 330 can involve automatically populating the additional furniture component within the design space. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software program places an additional furniture component (e.g., product assembly 112b) within the design space 110 of the interface 100. Furthermore, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software program places the product assembly 112b at a location corresponding to the user input received regarding the drawing start point (i.e., point “c”) and the drawing direction (the direction generally from point “c” to point “d”).

Act 330 can also involve automatically placing all of the bracketry and connectors needed to interconnect the additional furniture component. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software program automatically places all of the brackets 124 and end supports 126 necessary to connect and support the work surfaces 122 and panel dividers 120 of the product assembly 112b. One will appreciate that in the implementations of the present invention where the additional furniture component comprises a single furniture component (a wall, a wall divider, a work surface, a desk etc.), connectors and bracketry may not be necessary.

FIG. 3 also shows that the method can comprise an act 340 of automatically configuring an interconnection type between the first furniture component and the additional furniture component based upon the position of the at least one drawing start point and the drawing direction. Act 340 can involve ascertaining the user's design intent regarding the type of interconnection desired between the first furniture component and the additional furniture component by interpreting the position of the at least one drawing start point and the drawing direction.

For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software program automatically creates an L-corner joint between the first furniture component (i.e., product assembly 112a) and the additional furniture component (i.e., product assembly 112b) by abutting the product assembly 112b against the product assembly 112a. The design software program can configure the L-corner joint based on the location of the drawing start point “c” being adjacent the edge of the product assembly 112a, and the drawing direction from the drawing start point toward the point “d.” FIG. 1B also illustrates that the design software program automatically populates the necessary connection components (i.e., brackets 124) to secure the product assembly 112b to the product assembly 112a.

In contrast to FIG. 1B, FIG. 1C illustrates that the design software program automatically creates an angled corner joint between the first furniture component (i.e., product assembly 112a) and the additional furniture component (i.e., product assembly 112c). The design software program can configure the angled corner joint based on user input indicating the location of the drawing start point “e” at or near the center of the product assembly 112a, and the drawing direction from the drawing start point toward the point “d.” FIG. 1C also illustrates that the design software program automatically populates the necessary connection components (i.e., brackets 124) to secure the product assembly 112c to the product assembly 112a.

Act 340 can also involve automatically adding, removing, or modifying one or more parts or components of the one or both of the first the first furniture component and the additional furniture component to accommodate the interconnection type. For example, FIG. 1B illustrates that the design software program modifies the length of the panel divider 112a and the work surface 122 of the product assembly 112a against which the product assembly 112b is abutted. Similarly, FIG. 1C illustrates that the design software program adds a rounded corner work surface 129 and an angled corner work surface 128 to facilitate the angled interconnection between the product assembly 112a and the product assembly 112c.

In addition to the forgoing, FIG. 4 illustrates that an additional or alternative method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 400 of receiving user input regarding the placement of one or more furniture components at a first lateral position and a first longitudinal position within a design space. Act 400 can involve identifying the placement of one or more first furniture components added to the design space by the user from a menu or toolbar or identifying a first furniture component imported into the design space from another software program. For example, FIG. 1C illustrates that the design software program identifies the placement of one or more furniture components (i.e., product assembly 112c) at a first lateral position and a first longitudinal position within the design space 110 as a user selects icon 104 and draws the product assembly 112c within the design space 110 of the interface 100.

FIG. 4 also shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 410 of identifying one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the one or more furniture components. Act 410 can involve identifying product features and characteristics associated with the one or more furniture components, such as, for example, size, shape, color, type, texture, price, material composition, etc. Act 410 can also involve identifying rules and behaviors associated with the one more furniture components, such as, for example, the type and number of connectors and bracketry need to support each component or assembly, how the components and assemblies interact with other design elements, applicable codes, manufacturing guidelines, and physical limitations. For example, FIG. 1C illustrates that the design software program can create intelligent, automatically resolvable objects for each component that includes one or more attributes and product parameters, which the design software program can store in an object database 115.

In addition, FIG. 4 shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 420 of receiving user input regarding the placement of an additional furniture component at the first lateral position and the first longitudinal position within the design space. Act 420 can involve identifying the placement of an additional furniture component added to the design space by the user from a menu or toolbar or identifying an additional furniture component imported into the design space from another software program. For example, FIG. 1D illustrates that the design software program identifies the placement of an overhead cabinet 130a at the first lateral position and the first longitudinal position within the design space 110 (i.e., the same lateral and longitudinal position as the work surface 122d of the product assembly 112c). Additionally, FIG. 1E illustrates that the design software program identifies the placement of a file cabinet 132a at the first lateral position and the first longitudinal position within the design space 110 (i.e., the same lateral and longitudinal position as the work surface 122d and the overhead cabinet 130a).

Furthermore, FIG. 4 shows that the method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 430 of identifying one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the additional furniture component. Act 430 can involve identifying product features and characteristics associated with the additional furniture component, such as, for example, size, shape, color, type, texture, price, material composition, etc. Act 430 can also involve identifying rules and behaviors associated with the additional furniture component, such as, for example, the type and number of connectors and bracketry need to support the component or assembly, how the components and assemblies interact with other design elements, applicable codes, manufacturing guidelines, and physical limitations. For example, FIGS. 1D and 1E illustrate that the design software program can create intelligent, automatically resolvable objects for the overhead cabinet 130a and the file cabinet 132a that include one or more attributes and product parameters.

Still further, FIG. 4 shows a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 440 of constraining the vertical position of the additional furniture component based at least partially upon the one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the additional furniture component and the one or more attributes and product parameters associated with the one or more furniture components. Act 440 can involve automatically resolving the vertical position of the additional furniture relative to the other components within the design space based on the attributes and product parameters associated with each component within the design space. For example, FIG. 1E illustrates that the design software program constrains the vertical position of the file cabinet 132a on the ground vertically below the work surface 122d. Similarly, FIG. 1D illustrates that the design software program constrains the vertical position of the overhead cabinet 130a on the wall divider 120d, vertically above the work surface 122d.

Additionally, FIG. 5 illustrates that an additional or alternative method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 500 of identifying the placement of a furniture component within a design space. Act 500 can involve identifying the placement of a furniture component added to the design space by the user from a menu or toolbar, or identifying a first furniture component imported into the design space from another software program. For example, FIG. 2A illustrates that the design software program identifies the placement of a furniture component (i.e., product assembly 116a) as a user selects icon 106 and draws the product assembly 116a within the design space 110 of the interface 100. One will appreciate that the first furniture component need not be a product assembly 116a, but can be an individual component, such as, for example, a wall divider, a work surface, a bracket or other connector, a chair, a table, etc.

FIG. 5 also shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 510 of displaying one or more grips about the furniture component. The act 510 can involve displaying the one or more grips about each component of a product assembly, about an entire product assembly, or both. For instance, FIG. 2A illustrates that the design software system displays grips 150 about the work surfaces 122e and 122f.

Still further, FIG. 5 shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 520 of receiving user input regarding the movement of the one or more grips from a default location to a new location. Act 520 can involve moving a single grip or multiple grips in unison. For example, FIG. 2A illustrates that a user moves grip 150a from a default location “f” to a new location “g.” Additionally, FIG. 2A illustrates that a user moves grip 150b from a default location “h” to a new location “i.”

Furthermore, FIG. 5 shows that a method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 530 of automatically resolving the furniture component by modifying a dimension of the furniture component to reflect a design intent indicated by the movement of the one or more grips. Act 530 can involve changing the shape of the furniture component or maintaining a shape and increasing the size of the furniture component. For example, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system can modify the work surface 122e to include a wave pattern. Furthermore, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system can modify the length of the work surface 122f.

Additionally, FIG. 5 shows that the method in accordance with an implementation of the present invention can comprise an act 540 of automatically modifying one or more design components adjacent to the furniture component. Act 540 can involve adding or removing an adjacent design component, or modifying the dimensions of the one or more adjacent design components. For example, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system automatically increases the length of the end support 126a. Additionally, FIG. 2B illustrates that the design software system automatically adds a new cantilever support 127.

In view of the foregoing, one will appreciate that the components and modules of the present invention can increase the accuracy, speed of creation, and validity of furniture design layouts, while also reducing dependency upon the skill of the user. For example, components and modules of the present invention can capture product knowledge automatically rather than requiring the user to know and remember how various products and components interact and inter-relate. This automatic calculation and correction by the software can minimize human error, allow for immediate design change without rework, reduce or eliminate manual audit processes, and automate drawing and document creation processes. Such error reduction is further enhanced not only by automated corrections, but also due to accurate 3D validation of the design, and further allowing more sales due to the faster time to delivery and powerful visual lure of the 3D representation.

The embodiments of the present invention may comprise a special purpose or general-purpose computer including various computer hardware, as discussed in greater detail below. Embodiments within the scope of the present invention also include computer-readable media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.

By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM, DRAM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a computer, the computer properly views the connection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.

Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. For example, one will appreciate in light of the disclosure herein that, if desired, a user can manually perform each step described herein as being automatically performed by the design software system (e.g., placement, modification, addition, and removal of design components and interconnection types). Additionally, the user can manually change any action taken by the software system. Thus, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for automatically configuring a design space by using product parameters and attributes to replicate a given product based on a user's gesture for indicating placement, and then automatically populating the design space with all required connectors and bracketing to support the indicated placement of the given product, the computer-implemented method being performed by one or more processors executing computer executable instructions for the computer-implemented method, and the computer-implemented method comprising: storing in a database a plurality of different product components to be used in designing an interior workspace, each product component being defined by (i) associated parameters that define each type of component, and (ii) attributes that are defined by rules, characteristics and behaviors of each component and any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support for each type of component;inputting at a graphical user interface (GUI) of the system a two-dimensional design space;identifying a first product component that is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting at the GUI a starting point at which the first product component is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting at the GUI an end point which defines a region over which the first product component is to be replicated within the two-dimensional design space;thereafter retrieving from the database the identified first product component and automatically replicating the first product component a given number of times beginning from the starting point to the end point for the defined region, the replication being done in a manner that fits the first product component and all replications thereof to the defined region of the two-dimensional design space, and wherein the automatic replication comprises automatically adding for each replication of the first product component any required hardware for connecting or providing structural support to join the first product component and the replicated first product components together within the defined region of the two-dimensional design space; andthereafter generating a fully compatible three-dimension view of the design space.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: inputting at the GUI of the system a second product component that is to be integrated as part of the two-dimensional design space, the system processor thereafter: retrieving from the database the identified second product component and automatically integrating the second product component into the design space in a manner that fits the first product component and the second product component to the defined region of the two-dimensional design space, including automatically populating the defined region of the two-dimensional design space with any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support to the first and second product components required to fit the first and second product components within the defined region of the two-dimensional design space.
3. The method as recited in claim 2, further comprising: receiving an indication to place the second product component in a position that is spatially above at least a portion of the first product component; andautomatically constraining the vertical position of the second product component.
4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein automatically constraining the vertical position of the second product component comprises placing the second product component at a default height within the design space.
5. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein automatically constraining the vertical position of the second product component comprises: identifying within the attributes associated with the second product component one or more vertical positions associated with the second product component;providing an option to a user to select one of the one or more vertical positions; andplacing the second product component at the select vertical position within the design space.
6. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein automatically constraining the vertical position of the second product component comprises: identifying within the attributes associated with the second product component one or more vertical positions associated with the second product component;determining a most common vertical position of the one or more vertical positions, wherein the most common vertical position is the vertical position of the one or more vertical positions that is most commonly selected by a user; andplacing the second product component at the most comment vertical position within the design space.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: receiving user input at the GUI to change a dimensional parameter of the first product component, wherein the user input comprises selecting a portion of first product component and dragging the selected portion;automatically adjusting the first product component and the required hardware to account for the changed dimensional parameter; anddepicting with each of the one or more views the changed dimensional parameter.
8. The method as recited in claim 7, further comprising: identifying an attribute of the first product component that requires dimensions of the first product component to conform with predetermined increments; andautomatically adjusting the first product component and the required hardware to account for the changed dimensional parameter and the predetermined increments.
9. A computer-implemented method for automatically configuring a design space in a first two-dimensional view by using product parameters and attributes to replicate a given product based on a user's gesture for indicating placement, and then automatically populating the two-dimensional and a related three-dimensional design space with all required connectors and bracketing to support the indicated placement of the given product, the computer-implemented method being performed by one or more processors executing computer executable instructions for the computer-implemented method, and the computer-implemented method comprising: storing in a database a plurality of different product components to be used in designing an interior workspace, each product component being defined by (i) associated parameters that define each type of component, and (ii) attributes that are defined by rules, characteristics and behaviors of each component and any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support for each type of component;inputting at a graphical user interface (GUI) of the system a two-dimensional design space;identifying a first product component that is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting at the GUI a starting point at which the first product component is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting at the GUI an end point which defines a region over which the first product component is to be replicated within the two-dimensional design space;thereafter retrieving from the database the identified first product component and automatically replicating the first product component a given number of times beginning from the starting point to the end point for the defined region, the replication being done in a manner that fits the first product component and all replications thereof to the defined region of the two-dimensional design space, and wherein the automatic replication comprises automatically adding for each replication of the first product component any required hardware for connecting or providing structural support to join the first product component and the replicated first product components together within the defined region of the two-dimensional design space; andgenerating a three-dimensional view that is fully consistent with the two-dimensional view, wherein generating the three-dimensional view comprises: automatically populating the corresponding defined region in the three-dimensional design space with any required hardware, for vertically connecting or providing vertical structural support to the replicated product components; required to fit the first product component and all replications thereof within the defined region of the three-dimensional design space;automatically constraining the vertical position of the first product component and replications thereof so that the first product component and all replications thereof vertically fit within the defined region.
10. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising automatically determining a parts list associated with the first product component and the required hardware.
11. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising: inputting at the GUI of the system a second product component that is to be integrated as part of the design space, the system processor thereafter:retrieving from the database the identified second product component and automatically integrating the second product component into the design space in a manner that fits the first product component and the second product component to the defined region of the design space, including automatically populating the indicated region of the design space with any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support to the first and second product components required to fit the first and second product components within the indicated region of the design space.
12. The method as recited in claim 11, further comprising: receiving input from a user changing the second product component from a first type to a second type, wherein the second type comprises attributes that are different from the first type; andautomatically incorporating the second product component for the second type into the design space.
13. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising: placing within the design space one or more reference copies of the first product component;receiving input from a user changing a feature of the first product component; andautomatically propagating the changed feature throughout each of the one or more reference copies.
14. A computer system for automatically configuring a design space by using product parameters and attributes to replicate a given product based on a user's gesture for indicating placement, and then automatically populating the design space with all required connectors and bracketing to support the indicated placement of the given product, the computer system comprising: a database for storing a plurality of different product components to be used in designing an interior workspace, each product component being defined by (i) associated parameters that define each type of component, and (ii) attributes that are defined by rules, characteristics and behaviors of each component and any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support for each type of component;a graphical user interface (GUI) of the system configured for: inputting a two-dimensional design space;identifying a first product component that is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting a starting point at which the first product component is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space; andinputting an end point which defines a region over which the first product component is to be replicated within the two-dimensional design space; anda system processor programmed to: retrieve from the database the identified first product component and automatically replicating the first product component a given number of times beginning from the starting point to the end point for the defined region, the replication being done in a manner that fits the first product component and all replications thereof to the defined region of the two-dimensional design space, and wherein the automatic replication comprises automatically adding for each replication of the first product component any required hardware for connecting or providing structural support to join the first product component and the replicated first product components together within the defined region of the two-dimensional design space; andgenerate a fully compatible three-dimension view of the design space.
15. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein the system processor is further programmed to: input at the GUI of the system a second product component that is to be integrated as part of the design space, the system processor thereafter: retrieving from the database the identified second product component and automatically integrating the second product component into the design space in a manner that fits the first product component and the second product component to the indicated region of the design space, including automatically populating the indicated region of the design space with any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support to the first and second product components required to fit the first and second product components within the indicated region of the design space.
16. The system as recited in claim 15, wherein the system processor is further programmed to: receive an indication to place the second product component in a position that is spatially above at least a portion of the first product component; andautomatically constrain the vertical position of the second product component.
17. The system as recited in claim 16, wherein the system processor is further programmed to: identify within the attributes associated with the second product component one or more vertical positions associated with the second product component;determine a most common vertical position of the one or more vertical positions, wherein the most common vertical position is the vertical position of the one or more vertical positions that is most commonly selected by a user; andplace the second product component at the most comment vertical position within the design space.
18. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein the system processor is further programmed to: receive user input at the GUI to change a dimensional parameter of the first product component, wherein the user input comprises selecting a portion of first product component and dragging the selected portion;identify an attribute of the first product component that requires dimensions of the first product component to conform with predetermined increments;automatically adjust the first product component and the required hardware to account for the changed dimensional parameter and the predetermined increments; anddepict with each of the one or more views to depict the changed dimensional parameter.
19. A computer system for automatically configuring a design space in a first two-dimensional view by using product parameters and attributes to replicate a given product based on a user's gesture for indicating placement, and then automatically populating the two-dimensional and a related three-dimensional design space with all required connectors and bracketing to support the indicated placement of the given product, the computer system comprising: a database for storing a plurality of different product components to be used in designing an interior workspace, each product component being defined by (i) associated parameters that define each type of component, and (ii) attributes that are defined by rules, characteristics and behaviors of each component and any associated hardware for connecting or providing structural support for each type of component;a graphical user interface (GUI) configured for: inputting a two-dimensional design space;identifying a first product component that is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space;inputting a starting point at which the first product component is to be placed within the two-dimensional design space; andinputting an end point which defines a region over which the first product component is to be replicated within the two-dimensional design space; anda system processor programmed to retrieve from the database the identified first product component and automatically replicating the first product component a given number of times beginning from the starting point to the end point for the defined region, the replication being done in a manner that fits the first product component and all replications thereof to the defined region of the two-dimensional design space, and wherein the automatic replication comprises automatically adding for each replication of the first product component any required hardware for connecting or providing structural support to join the first product component and the replicated first product components together within the defined region of the two-dimensional design space; andgenerate a three-dimensional view that is fully consistent with the two-dimensional view, wherein generating the three-dimensional view comprises: automatically populating the corresponding defined region in the three-dimensional design space with any required hardware, for vertically connecting or providing vertical structural support to the replicated product components required to fit the first product component and all replications thereof within the defined region of the three-dimensional design space;automatically constraining the vertical position of the first product component and replications thereof so that the first product component and all replications thereof vertically fit within the defined region.
20. The system as recited in claim 19, wherein the system processor is further programmed to: place within the design space one or more reference copies of the first product component;receive input from a user changing a feature of the first product component; andautomatically propagate the changed feature throughout each of the one or more reference copies.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is a continuation of U.S. National Stage application Ser. No. 12/444,886 filed Jun. 24, 2009 entitled “Automatically Creating and Modifying Furniture Layouts in Design Software” which corresponds to PCT/CA2009/000311, filed on Mar. 11, 2009, entitled “Automatically Creating and Modifying Furniture Layouts in Design Software,” which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/035,716, filed on Mar. 11, 2008, entitled “Automated Layout for Space Planning and Specification of Configurable Furniture in Object Oriented Design Software.” Each of the aforementioned patent applications is incorporated by reference herein in its respective entirety.

US Referenced Citations (284)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4510369	Harrison	Apr 1985	A
4586145	Bracewell	Apr 1986	A
4700317	Watanabe	Oct 1987	A
4829446	Draney	May 1989	A
4862376	Ferriter	Aug 1989	A
5111392	Malin	May 1992	A
5255207	Cornwell	Oct 1993	A
5293479	Quintero	Mar 1994	A
5339247	Kirihara	Aug 1994	A
5386507	Teig	Jan 1995	A
5414801	Smith	May 1995	A
5514232	Burns	May 1996	A
5555357	Fernandes	Sep 1996	A
5555366	Teig	Sep 1996	A
5572639	Gantt	Nov 1996	A
5576965	Akasaka	Nov 1996	A
5588098	Chen	Dec 1996	A
5625827	Krause	Apr 1997	A
5684713	Asada	Nov 1997	A
5740341	Oota	Apr 1998	A
5742294	Watanabe	Apr 1998	A
5764241	Elliot	Jun 1998	A
5764518	Collins	Jun 1998	A
5866419	Lucas	Dec 1998	A
5870771	Oberg	Feb 1999	A
5894310	Arsenault	Apr 1999	A
5918232	Pouschine	Jun 1999	A
5977982	Lauzon	Nov 1999	A
5995107	Berteig	Nov 1999	A
6014503	Nagata	Jan 2000	A
6020885	Honda	Feb 2000	A
6025847	Marks	Feb 2000	A
6037945	Loveland	Mar 2000	A
6052669	Smith	Apr 2000	A
6253167	Matsuda	Jun 2001	B1
6292810	Richards	Sep 2001	B1
6295513	Thackston	Sep 2001	B1
6335732	Shaikh	Jan 2002	B1
6401237	Ishikawa	Jun 2002	B1
6459435	Eichel	Oct 2002	B1
6466239	Ishikawa	Oct 2002	B2
6483508	Ishikawa	Nov 2002	B1
6493679	Rappaport	Dec 2002	B1
6509906	Awe	Jan 2003	B1
6552721	Ishikawa	Apr 2003	B1
6570563	Honda	May 2003	B1
6626954	Kamachi	Sep 2003	B1
6662144	Normann	Dec 2003	B1
6684255	Martin	Jan 2004	B1
6690981	Kawachi	Feb 2004	B1
6701288	Normann	Mar 2004	B1
6721684	Saebi	Apr 2004	B1
6734852	Sowizral	May 2004	B2
6772168	Ardoin	Aug 2004	B2
6813610	Bienias	Nov 2004	B1
6826539	Loveland	Nov 2004	B2
6829584	Loveland	Dec 2004	B2
6888542	Clauss	May 2005	B1
6919891	Schneider	Jul 2005	B2
6922701	Ananian	Jul 2005	B1
6944513	Tomomitsu	Sep 2005	B1
6971063	Rappaport	Nov 2005	B1
6985832	Saebi	Jan 2006	B2
6999102	Felser	Feb 2006	B2
7016747	Ninomiya	Mar 2006	B1
7019753	Rappaport	Mar 2006	B2
7042440	Pryor	May 2006	B2
7050955	Carmel	May 2006	B1
7062454	Giannini	Jun 2006	B1
7062532	Sweat	Jun 2006	B1
7062722	Carlin et al.	Jun 2006	B1
7065420	Philpott	Jun 2006	B1
7079990	Haller	Jul 2006	B2
7080096	Imamura	Jul 2006	B1
7085697	Rappaport	Aug 2006	B1
7088374	David et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7096173	Rappaport	Aug 2006	B1
7127378	Hoffman	Oct 2006	B2
7139686	Critz	Nov 2006	B1
7155228	Rappaport	Dec 2006	B2
7170511	Sowizral	Jan 2007	B2
7171208	Rappaport	Jan 2007	B2
7171344	Lind	Jan 2007	B2
7173623	Calkins	Feb 2007	B2
7200639	Yoshida	Apr 2007	B1
7216092	Weber	May 2007	B1
7218979	Tsuji	May 2007	B2
7243054	Rappaport	Jul 2007	B2
7246044	Imamura	Jul 2007	B2
7246045	Rappaport	Jul 2007	B1
7249005	Loberg	Jul 2007	B2
7250944	Anderson	Jul 2007	B2
7262775	Calkins	Aug 2007	B2
7266768	Ferlitsch	Sep 2007	B2
7277572	MacInnes	Oct 2007	B2
7277830	Loberg	Oct 2007	B2
7299168	Rappaport	Nov 2007	B2
7299416	Jaeger	Nov 2007	B2
7318063	Brychell	Jan 2008	B2
7337093	Ramani	Feb 2008	B2
7340383	Mayuzumi	Mar 2008	B2
7353192	Ellis	Apr 2008	B1
7392522	Murray	Jun 2008	B2
7398481	Kraus	Jul 2008	B2
7430711	Rivers-Moore	Sep 2008	B2
7437376	Sikchi	Oct 2008	B2
7444195	Smith	Oct 2008	B2
7454259	Ninomiya	Nov 2008	B2
7479959	Han	Jan 2009	B2
7492934	Mundy	Feb 2009	B2
7516399	Hsu	Apr 2009	B2
7523411	Carlin	Apr 2009	B2
7574323	Rappaport	Aug 2009	B2
7587302	Arvin	Sep 2009	B2
7596518	Rappaport	Sep 2009	B2
7620638	Nonclercq	Nov 2009	B2
7629985	McArdle	Dec 2009	B2
7643027	Rothstein	Jan 2010	B2
7643966	Adachi	Jan 2010	B2
7661959	Green	Feb 2010	B2
7676348	Okada	Mar 2010	B2
7761266	Mangon	Jul 2010	B2
7788068	Mangon	Aug 2010	B2
7814436	Schrag	Oct 2010	B2
7822584	Saebi	Oct 2010	B1
7823074	Takemura	Oct 2010	B2
7856342	Kfouri	Dec 2010	B1
7864173	Handley	Jan 2011	B2
7877237	Saebi	Jan 2011	B1
7996756	Eilers	Aug 2011	B2
8065623	Bohlman	Nov 2011	B2
8065654	Shiihara	Nov 2011	B2
8100552	Spero	Jan 2012	B2
8108267	Varon	Jan 2012	B2
8117558	Hoguet	Feb 2012	B2
8132123	Schrag	Mar 2012	B2
8134553	Saini	Mar 2012	B2
8185219	Gilbert	May 2012	B2
8195434	Powell	Jun 2012	B2
8244025	Davis	Aug 2012	B2
8255338	Brittan	Aug 2012	B1
8270769	Judelson	Sep 2012	B2
8271336	Mikurak	Sep 2012	B2
8276088	Ke	Sep 2012	B2
8285707	Day	Oct 2012	B2
8290849	Eisler	Oct 2012	B2
8301527	Tarbox	Oct 2012	B2
8314799	Pelletier	Nov 2012	B2
8326926	Sangem	Dec 2012	B2
8332401	Hull	Dec 2012	B2
8332827	Edde	Dec 2012	B2
8334867	Davidson	Dec 2012	B1
8335789	Hull	Dec 2012	B2
8352218	Balla	Jan 2013	B2
8386918	Do	Feb 2013	B2
RE44054	Kim	Mar 2013	E
8402473	Becker	Mar 2013	B1
8423391	Hessedenz	Apr 2013	B2
8442850	Schorr	May 2013	B2
8462147	Sugden	Jun 2013	B2
8468175	Obata	Jun 2013	B2
8499250	Wetzer	Jul 2013	B2
8508539	Vlietinck	Aug 2013	B2
8510382	Purdy	Aug 2013	B2
8510672	Loberg	Aug 2013	B2
8521737	Hart	Aug 2013	B2
8533596	Boss	Sep 2013	B2
8566419	Purdy	Oct 2013	B2
8572558	Mathieu	Oct 2013	B1
8583375	Baule	Nov 2013	B2
8600989	Hull	Dec 2013	B2
8626877	Greene	Jan 2014	B2
8645973	Bosworth	Feb 2014	B2
8650179	Driesch	Feb 2014	B2
8763009	Degirmenci	Jun 2014	B2
8773426	Hamel	Jul 2014	B1
8819072	Croicu	Aug 2014	B1
8914259	Kripac	Dec 2014	B2
8933925	Sinha	Jan 2015	B2
8949789	Schlarb	Feb 2015	B2
8954295	Vicknair	Feb 2015	B1
8994726	Furukawa	Mar 2015	B1
9075931	Charles	Jul 2015	B2
9106425	Murphey	Aug 2015	B2
9117308	Nag	Aug 2015	B1
20010024211	Kudukoli	Sep 2001	A1
20010024230	Tsukahara	Sep 2001	A1
20010047250	Schuller	Nov 2001	A1
20010047251	Kemp	Nov 2001	A1
20020010589	Nashida	Jan 2002	A1
20020065635	Lei	May 2002	A1
20020069221	Rao	Jun 2002	A1
20020083076	Wucherer	Jun 2002	A1
20020085041	Ishikawa	Jul 2002	A1
20020091739	Ferlitsch	Jul 2002	A1
20020093538	Carlin	Jul 2002	A1
20020095348	Hiroshige	Jul 2002	A1
20020116163	Loveland	Aug 2002	A1
20020144204	Milner	Oct 2002	A1
20020158865	Dye	Oct 2002	A1
20020188678	Edecker	Dec 2002	A1
20020196285	Sojoodi	Dec 2002	A1
20030097273	Carpenter	May 2003	A1
20040012542	Bowsher	Jan 2004	A1
20040027371	Jaeger	Feb 2004	A1
20040059436	Anderson	Mar 2004	A1
20040098691	Teig	May 2004	A1
20040104934	Fager	Jun 2004	A1
20040117746	Narain	Jun 2004	A1
20040145614	Takagaki	Jul 2004	A1
20040153824	Devarajan	Aug 2004	A1
20040204903	Saebi	Oct 2004	A1
20040205519	Chapel	Oct 2004	A1
20040236561	Smith	Nov 2004	A1
20050041028	Coutts	Feb 2005	A1
20050065951	Liston	Mar 2005	A1
20050071135	Vredenburgh	Mar 2005	A1
20050081161	MacInnes	Apr 2005	A1
20050140668	Hlavac	Jun 2005	A1
20050203718	Carek	Sep 2005	A1
20050256874	Chiba	Nov 2005	A1
20060028695	Knighton	Feb 2006	A1
20060041518	Blair	Feb 2006	A1
20060041842	Loberg	Feb 2006	A1
20060119601	Finlayson	Jun 2006	A1
20060143220	Spencer	Jun 2006	A1
20060174209	Barros	Aug 2006	A1
20060206623	Gipps	Sep 2006	A1
20060271378	Day	Nov 2006	A1
20070065002	Marzell	Mar 2007	A1
20070088704	Bourne	Apr 2007	A1
20070097121	Loop	May 2007	A1
20070115275	Cook	May 2007	A1
20070168325	Bourne	Jul 2007	A1
20070180425	Storms	Aug 2007	A1
20070188488	Choi	Aug 2007	A1
20070204241	Glennie	Aug 2007	A1
20070219645	Thomas	Sep 2007	A1
20070240049	Rogerson	Oct 2007	A1
20070250295	Murray	Oct 2007	A1
20070260432	Okada	Nov 2007	A1
20070271870	Mifsud	Nov 2007	A1
20070294622	Sterner	Dec 2007	A1
20080036769	Coutts	Feb 2008	A1
20080052618	McMillan	Feb 2008	A1
20080126021	Hoguet	May 2008	A1
20080140732	Wilson	Jun 2008	A1
20080141334	Wicker	Jun 2008	A1
20080143884	Foster	Jun 2008	A1
20080165183	Rassieur	Jul 2008	A1
20080174598	Risenhoover	Jul 2008	A1
20080188969	O'Malley	Aug 2008	A1
20080238946	Baughman	Oct 2008	A1
20080249756	Chaisuparasmikul	Oct 2008	A1
20080275674	Reghetti	Nov 2008	A1
20080282166	Fillman	Nov 2008	A1
20080303844	Reghetti	Dec 2008	A1
20080309678	Reghetti	Dec 2008	A1
20090069704	MacAdam	Mar 2009	A1
20090110307	Markowitz	Apr 2009	A1
20090113349	Zohar	Apr 2009	A1
20090119039	Banister	May 2009	A1
20090138826	Barros	May 2009	A1
20090148050	Reghetti	Jun 2009	A1
20090187385	Zegdoun	Jul 2009	A1
20090210487	Westerhoff	Aug 2009	A1
20090248184	Steingart	Oct 2009	A1
20090254843	Van Wie	Oct 2009	A1
20090273598	Reghetti	Nov 2009	A1
20100017733	Barros	Jan 2010	A1
20100042516	Knipfer	Feb 2010	A1
20100121614	Reghetti	May 2010	A1
20100122196	Wetzer	May 2010	A1
20100138762	Reghetti	Jun 2010	A1
20100185514	Glazer	Jul 2010	A1
20100302245	Best	Dec 2010	A1
20110078169	Sit	Mar 2011	A1
20110169826	Elsberg	Jul 2011	A1
20110258573	Wetzer	Oct 2011	A1
20110320966	Edecker	Dec 2011	A1
20120005353	Edecker	Jan 2012	A1
20120069011	Hurt	Mar 2012	A1
20120331422	High	Dec 2012	A1
20140067333	Rodney	Mar 2014	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (19)

Number	Date	Country
1098244	Sep 2001	EP
1204046	May 2002	EP
2563516	Oct 1985	FR
120633	Nov 1918	GB
2364801	Feb 2002	GB
62127426	Jun 1987	JP
10334127	Dec 1998	JP
2005301630	Oct 2005	JP
9003618	Apr 1990	WO
9322741	Nov 1993	WO
0219177	Mar 2002	WO
02075597	Sep 2002	WO
03023559	Mar 2003	WO
2005033985	Apr 2005	WO
2006018740	Feb 2006	WO
2006018744	Feb 2006	WO
2007093060	Aug 2007	WO
2007106873	Sep 2007	WO
2009100538	Aug 2009	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)

Entry
Bing search q=cad+component+replicate&src=IE-Sea Apr. 2, 2016.
Bing search q=cad+replicate+part&src=IE-SearchBo Apr. 2, 2016.
European Search Report—Application No./ Patent No. 09719352.8-1960 / 2252951 PCT/CA2009000311.
International Search Report and Witten Opinion for PCT/US2012/038582 mailed Dec. 28, 2012.
Gajamani, Geetha., “Automated Project Scheduling and Inventory Monitoring Using RFID”, 2007, 24th Internationial Symposium on Automation and Robiotics in Construction. Retrieved from http://www.iaarc.org/publications/proceedings—of—the—24th—isarc/automated—project—schedule—and—inventory—monitoring—using—rfid.html.
European Search Report—Application No. 10 833 972.2 mailed Feb. 2, 2015.
European Search Report—Application No. 12800327.4 mailed Feb. 18, 2015.
Funkhouser T et al: Modeling by example, ACM Transactions on Grpahic (TOG), ACM, US, vol. 23, No. 3, Aug. 1, 2004 (Aug. 1, 2004), pp. 652-663, XP008087089, ISSN: 0730-0301, DOI: 10.1145/1015706.1015775 abstract p. 652, col. 1, paragraph 2- col. 2, paragraph 2 p. 656, col. 1, paragraph 3-5.
Anonymous: “Dresden Frauenkirche—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”, Jun. 8, 2011 (Jun. 8, 2011), pp. 1-7, XP055168540 retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dresden—Frauenkirche&oldid=433207596 [retrieved on Feb. 9, 2015] p. 3, paragraph 7-9.
Wollongong, City Centre 3D Model Specifications, May 18, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/579,261 mailed on Jul. 10, 2015.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/510,912 mailed Sep. 14, 2015.
Blythe, Rise of the Graphics Processor, IEEE, 2008.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Clear Cache, IE, 2007.
Wang, Intellectual Property Protection in Collaborative Design through Lean information Modeling and Sharing , 2006.
Lea, Community Place Architecture and Performance, 2007.
Autodesk, Maya 8.5 Shading, 2007.
CRC, Final Report Collaboration Platform. 2009.
Mental Images GmbH, RealityServer Functional Overview White Paper, 2007.
Rozansk, Software Systems Architecture Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives, 2008.
Sony, Community Place Conductor 2.0 Users Manual, 1998.
Vasko, Collaborative Modeling of Web Applications for Various Stakeholders, 2009.
Gross M D: “Why can't CAD be more like Lego? CKB, a program for building constructions kits”, Automation in Construction, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 5, No. 4, Oct. 1, 1996 (Oct. 1, 1996) pp. 285-300, XP004072247, ISSN: 0926-5805, DOI:10.1016/S0926-5805(96)00154-9.
Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2006 (Paper No. 20060925), U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,419, filed Aug. 16, 2005.
Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2006 (Paper No. 20061012), U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,420, filed Aug. 16, 2005.
Chan, et al.: “Design of a Walkthrough System for Indoor Environments from Floor Plans”; Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, Jul. 29-31, 1998, pp. 50-57.
Edward J. Dejesus, James P. Callan, and Curtis R. Whitehead, Pearl: An Expert System for Power Supply Layout, 23rd Design Automation Conference, Paper 34.4, IEEE.
Josie Wernecke; Title: The Inventor Mentor: Programming Object Oriented 3D Graphics with Open Inventor; Release 2; Date: Jun. 19, 1997; Published on Web Site: www.cs.ualberta.cal-.
Office Action Mailed Nov. 28, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Office Action Mailed Aug. 11, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Office Action Mailed Dec. 23, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Office Action Mailed Mar. 31, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Office Action Mailed May 15, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Office Action Mailed Jul. 29, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
International Search Report and Opinion on PCT/CA2007/000241, mailed May 15, 2007.
International Search Report and Opinion on PCT/CA2009/000190, mailed Jun. 5, 2009.
International Search Report and Opinion on PCT/CA2009/000183, mailed Jun. 9, 2009.
International Search Report and Opinion on PCT/CA2009/000311, mailed Jul. 30, 2009.
Office Action Mailed Aug. 18, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,302.
USPTO, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/444,886, mailed Oct. 27, 2011, 24 pages.
Advisory Action Mailed Mar. 31, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
Advisory Action Mailed May 15, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,421.
USPTO, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/444,890, mailed Oct. 27, 2011, 30 pages.
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/058092 dated Jul. 27, 2011.
Marir F et al: “OSCONCAD: a model-based CAD system integrated with computer applications”, Proceedings of the International Construction IT Conference, vol. 3, 1998.
EPO Search Report for EP07701791 dated Aug. 21, 2012.
USPTO, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/444,886, mailed Aug. 16, 2012.
International Search Report for PCT/CA2009000190 mailed Apr. 12, 2012.
USPTO, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/444,893 mailed Feb. 19, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/032,946 dated Mar. 9, 2016.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20130212513 A1	Aug 2013	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	61035716	Mar 2008	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12444886		US
Child	13839033		US

Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract