The present invention relates generally to the field of surgery, and more specifically to devices, systems, and methods for treatment of an eye. Exemplary embodiments allow enhanced treatment to structures within an eye by at least once (though more commonly repeatedly or even cyclically) applying different levels and/or types of aspiration to an ocular probe, often such that the aspiration changes during a treatment of a particular eye.
The present invention is generally related to methods, devices, and systems for controlling surgical fluid flows, particularly during treatment of an eye. In exemplary embodiments, the invention removes material from within the eye in part by a displacement-induced aspiration flow (such as that caused by a peristaltic or other positive displacement pump), and in part by a vacuum-induced aspiration flow (such as that caused by a venturi pump). Optionally, the aspiration flow may switch between a displacement pump and a venturi pump while material is being fragmented and removed from within the eye. While the system operator will typically have control over the overall mode of operation throughout a procedure, switching between these two different types of aspiration flow may occur “on-the-fly” without halting of a corresponding irrigation flow, and without awaiting input from the system operator regarding that particular flow change. The material may be removed from an anterior or posterior chamber of the eye, such as for phacoemulsification of cataracts, treatment of retinal diseases, vitrectomy, and the like.
The optical elements of the eye include both a cornea (at the front of the eye) and a lens within the eye. The lens and cornea work together to focus light onto the retina at the back of the eye. The lens also changes in shape, adjusting the focus of the eye to vary between viewing near objects and far objects. The lens is found just behind the pupil, and within a capsular bag. This capsular bag is a thin, relatively delicate structure which separates the eye into anterior and posterior chambers.
With age, clouding of the lens or cataracts is fairly common. Cataracts may form in the hard central nucleus of the lens, in the softer peripheral cortical portion of the lens, or at the back of the lens near the capsular bag.
Cataracts can be treated by the replacement of the cloudy lens with an artificial lens. Phacoemulsification systems often use ultrasound energy to fragment the lens and aspirate the lens material from within the capsular bag. This may allow the remaining capsular bag to be used for positioning of the artificial lens, and maintains the separation between the anterior portion of the eye and the vitreous humour in the posterior chamber of the eye.
During cataract surgery and other therapies of the eye, accurate control over the volume of fluid within the eye is highly beneficial. For example, while ultrasound energy breaks up the lens and allows it to be drawn into a treatment probe with an aspiration flow, a corresponding irrigation flow may be introduced into the eye so that the total volume of fluid in the eye does not change excessively. If the total volume of fluid in the eye is allowed to get too low at any time during the procedure, the eye may collapse and cause significant tissue damage. Similarly, excessive pressure within the eye may strain and injure tissues of the eye.
While a variety of specific fluid transport mechanisms have been used in phacoemulsification and other treatment systems for the eyes, aspiration flow systems can generally be classified in two categories: 1) volumetric-based aspiration flow systems using positive displacement pumps; and 2) vacuum-based aspiration systems using a vacuum source, typically applied to the aspiration flow through an air-liquid interface. Among positive displacement aspiration systems, peristaltic pumps (which use rotating rollers that press against a flexible tubing to induce flow) are commonly employed. Such pumps provide accurate control over the flow volume. The pressure of the flow, however, is less accurately controlled and the variations in vacuum may result in the feel or traction of the handpiece varying during a procedure. Peristaltic and other displacement pump systems may also be somewhat slow for some procedures. Vacuum rise times tend to be slower for peristaltic systems than venturi systems. This may result in an overall sluggish feel to the surgeon. Moreover, the ultrasonic vibrations of a phacoemulsification tip may (despite peristaltic aspiration flow into the tip) inhibit the desired fragmentation-inducing engagement between the tip and tissue particles.
Vacuum-based aspiration systems provide accurate control over the fluid pressure within the eye, particularly when combined with gravity-fed irrigation systems. While vacuum-based systems can (in some circumstances) result in excessive fluid flows, they may have advantages when, for example, it is desired to bring tissue fragments to the probe, or when removing a relatively large quantity of the viscous vitreous humour from the posterior chamber of the eye. Unfortunately, venturi pump and other vacuum-based aspiration flow systems are subject to pressure surges during occlusion of the treatment probe, and such pressure surges may decrease the surgeon's control over the eye treatment procedure. Displacement pump systems are similarly subject to vacuum spikes during and immediately following occlusion of the probe.
While there have been prior proposals for multiple pump systems which make use of either a positive displacement pump or a vacuum source, the previously proposed systems have not been ideal. Hence, to provide surgeons with the benefits of both vacuum-based and displacement-based aspiration flows, still further improvements appear desirable. In particular, interrupting a procedure to switch between aspiration systems may be inconvenient, and it may be difficult or even impossible to take full advantage (for example) of the full potential of combining both vacuum-based and displacement-based aspiration flows using prior eye treatment systems.
In light of the above, it would be advantageous to provide improved devices, systems, and methods for eye surgery. It would be particularly advantageous if these improvements allowed system users to maintain the benefits of vacuum and/or displacement fluid control systems when appropriate, and without having to interrupt the procedure to manually switch pumps, change hand pieces or other system components, or the like. Ideally, these improved systems would provide benefits beyond those of peristaltic or venturi systems alone, or combination peristaltic/venturi systems, without delaying the procedure or increasing the complexity of the operation to the system operator.
One embodiment of the invention may include a method for applying aspiration to a probe, which may be computer implemented. The method may include applying a low flow-rate aspiration from a first pump to an aspiration port of a probe, detecting that the aspiration port is insufficiently occluded, applying a high flow-rate aspiration from a second pump to the non-occluded aspiration port, detecting that the aspiration port is sufficiently occluded, and discontinuing the high flow-rate aspiration and reapplying the low flow-rate aspiration to the occluded aspiration port. Any of the steps of the method may automatically occur based on the program being used.
Another embodiment of the invention may include a method for removing tissue from within an eye. The method may include aspirating fluid and material using a probe within the eye by pumping the fluid and material through an aspiration pathway with a first pump (e.g. a volumetric pump or a pressure pump), generating a command signal by detecting insufficient occlusion of the aspiration pathway during the first pumping, bringing material from within the eye to the probe by a second pump in response to the command signal, and resuming aspiration of the material and the fluid with the first pump after the second pump. The first pump and the second pump may comprise a flow based pump and/or a vacuum based pump.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a system for removing tissue from within an eye. The system may include a probe having a distal tip insertable into the eye, wherein the tip comprises an aspiration port, a console coupled with/to the port along an aspiration pathway, and wherein the console comprises a processor and a pump system. Further, the pump system comprises a first pump and a second pump for providing a first aspiration rate and a second aspiration rate higher than the first pump rate, and the processor is configured to, during pumping of aspiration flow along the aspiration pathway at the first aspiration rate and in response to insufficient occlusion of the aspiration pathway, generate a command signal so as to induce pumping of the aspiration flow along the aspiration pathway at the second aspiration rate.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a method for applying aspiration to a phacoemulsification device. The method may be computer implemented. The method may include applying a first flow-rate (e.g. low flow-rate) aspiration from a first pump to an aspiration port of a phacoemulsification device, periodically applying ultrasonic energy to the phacoemulsification device according to a predetermined duty cycle, and applying a second flow-rate (e.g. high flow-rate) aspiration from a second pump to the aspiration port when ultrasonic energy is not being applied. Any of the steps of the method may automatically occur based on the program being used.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a phacoemulsification system. The system including a probe having a distal tip insertable into an eye, wherein the tip is energizable with phacoemulsification energy and comprises an aspiration port. The system further includes a console coupled with/to the port along an aspiration pathway, wherein the console comprises a processor and a pump system. The pump system comprises a first pump and a second pump for providing a first pump rate and a second pump rate higher than the first pump rate. Further, the processor is configured to, during pumping of aspiration flow along the aspiration pathway, transmit time coordinated command signals to energize the tip with the energy and switch between the pumping rates.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a method for applying aspiration to a probe device. The method may be computer implemented. The method may include applying a low flow-rate aspiration from a first pump to an aspiration port of a phacoemulsification device, detecting that the aspiration port is sufficiently occluded, and cycling a high flow-rate aspiration with a high-flow rate reflux from a second pump to the aspiration port.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a method for removing material from an eye. The method may include applying a first aspiration level to an aspiration port of a probe within an eye, applying a second aspiration level higher than the first aspiration level to the port, and cycling between the aspiration levels sufficiently for transient-induced effects of the aspiration level to help break-up the material for aspiration through the port.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a system for removing material from within an eye. The system may include a probe having a distal tip insertable into the eye, wherein the tip comprises an aspiration port, and a console coupled with/to the port along an aspiration pathway. The console comprises a processor and a pump system, wherein the pump system comprises a first pump and a second pump for providing a first aspiration level and a second aspiration level higher than the first aspiration level. Further, the processor is configured to cycle between the aspiration levels sufficiently for transient-induced effects of the aspiration level to help break-up the material for aspiration through the port.
Yet another embodiment of the invention may include a computer implemented method for applying aspiration through a probe. The method may include applying a low flow-rate aspiration from a first pump to an aspiration port of a probe, receiving a user input to change to a high flow-rate aspiration from a second pump to the aspiration port, and switching the low flow-rate aspiration to the high flow-rate aspiration in response to the user input.
To better understand the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description and the accompanying figures. It is to be understood, however, that the figures and descriptions of exemplary embodiments are provided for the purpose of illustration only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the scope of the present invention.
A switch module associated with foot pedal 104 may transmit control signals relating internal physical and virtual switch position information as input to the instrument host 102 over serial communications cable 105 (although foot pedal 104 may be connected wireless, e.g. Bluetooth, IR). Instrument host 102 may provide a database file system for storing configuration parameter values, programs, and other data saved in a storage device (not shown). In addition, the database file system may be realized on the GUI host 101 or any other subsystem (not shown) that could accommodate such a file system. The foot pedal system (104) can be configured as dual linear. In this configuration, the surgeon can dictate the system to operate with the peristaltic pump in the traditional pitch and add the venturi vacuum with the yaw mechanism. This will allow a surgeon the control of peristaltic operation with the added efficiency of venturi operation. The foot pedal 104 can also combine longitudinal cutting modes with a certain pump and non-longitudinal cutting modes (i.e., transversal, torsion, etc.) with a different pump for example, the foot pedal pitch could control a peristaltic pump with longitudinal ultrasonic cutting, and the yaw could control the venturi pump with non-longitudinal cutting. The foot pedal can also be configured to operate using a certain pump by yawing to the left and operate a second pump by yawing to the right. This gives the user the ability to switch-on-the-fly without accessing the user interface which may be timely and cumbersome.
The phacoemulsification/vitrectomy system 100 has a handpiece 110 that includes a needle and electrical means, typically a piezoelectric crystal, for ultrasonically vibrating the needle. The instrument host 102 supplies power on line 111 to a phacoemulsification/vitrectomy handpiece 110. An irrigation fluid source 112 can be fluidly coupled with/to handpiece 110 through line 113. The irrigation fluid and ultrasonic power are applied by handpiece 110 to an eye, or affected area or region, indicated diagrammatically by block 114. Alternatively, the irrigation source may be routed to eye 114 through a separate pathway independent of the handpiece. Aspiration is provided to eye 114 by one or more pumps (not shown), such as a peristaltic pump, via the instrument host 102, through lines 115 and 116. A surgeon/operator may select an amplitude of electrical pulses either using the handpiece, foot pedal, via the instrument host and/or GUI host, and/or by voice command.
The instrument host 102 generally comprises at least one processor board. Instrument host 102 may include many of the components of a personal computer, such as a data bus, a memory, input and/or output devices (including a touch screen (not shown)), and the like. Instrument host 102 will often include both hardware and software, with the software typically comprising machine readable code or programming instructions for implementing one, some, or all of the methods described herein. The code may be embodied by a tangible media such as a memory, a magnetic recording media, an optical recording media, or the like. A controller (not shown) may have (or be coupled with/to) a recording media reader, or the code may be transmitted to instrument host 102 by a network connection such as an internet, an intranet, an Ethernet, a wireless network, or the like. Along with programming code, instrument host 102 may include stored data for implementing the methods described herein, and may generate and/or store data that records parameters reflecting the treatment of one or more patients.
In combination with phacoemulsification system 100, the present system enables aspiration, venting, or reflux functionality in or with the phacoemulsification system and may comprise components including, but not limited to, a flow selector valve, two or more pumps, a reservoir, and a collector, such as a collection bag or a device having similar functionality. The collector in the present design collects aspirant from the ocular surgical procedure.
In certain embodiments, irrigation fluid is alternatively or additionally provided to a separate handpiece (not shown). The aspiration flow network 50 generally provides an aspiration flow path 52 that can couple an aspiration port in the tip of handpiece 110 to either a peristaltic pump 54, formed by engagement of cassette 16A with instrument host 102, and/or a holding tank 56. Fluid aspirated through the handpiece 110 may be contained in holding tank 56 regardless of whether the aspiration flow is induced by peristaltic pump 54 or the vacuum applied to the holding tank 56 via pump 57. When pinch valve 58 is closed and peristaltic pump 54 is in operation, pumping of the aspiration flow may generally be directed by the peristaltic pump 54, independent of the pressure in the holding tank 56. Conversely, when peristaltic pump 54 is off, flow through the peristaltic pump may be halted by pinching of the elastomeric tubing arc of the peristaltic pump by one or more of the individual rollers of the peristaltic pump rotor. Hence, any aspiration fluid drawn into the aspiration network when peristaltic pump 54 is off will typically be effected by opening of a pinch valve 58 so that the aspiration port of the probe is in fluid communication with the holding tank. Regardless, the pressure within tank 56 may be maintained at a controlled vacuum level, often at a fixed vacuum level, by a vacuum system 59 of instrument host 102.
Vacuum system 59 may comprise a Venturi pump 57, a rotary vane pump, a vacuum source, a vent valve 44, a filter, and/or the like. Aspiration flow fluid that drains into holding tank 56 may be removed by a peristaltic drain pump 60 and directed to a disposal fluid collection bag 62. Vacuum pressure at the surgical handpiece 110 may be maintained within a desired range through control of the fluid level in the holding tank. In particular, peristaltic drain pump 60 enables the holding tank 56 to be drained including, while vacuum-based aspiration continues using vacuum system 59. In more detail, the operation of aspiration flow network 50 can be understood by first considering the flow when pinch valve 58 is closed. In this mode, peristaltic pump 54 draws fluid directly from handpiece 110, with a positive displacement peristaltic pump flow rate being controlled by a system controller. To determine the appropriate flow rate, the level of vacuum within the aspiration flow network may be identified in part with reference to a vacuum sensor 64 with three ports disposed along the aspiration flow network 50 between peristaltic pump 54, handpiece 110, and pinch valve 58. This allows the system to detect and adjust for temporary occlusions of the handpiece 110 and the like. Venting or reflux of the handpiece 110 in this state may be achieved by reversing the rotation of peristaltic pump 54 or by opening pinch valve 58 to equalize fluid pressures. Pinch valve 58 may be configured as a variable restrictor to regulate the amount of fluid that is vented and/or refluxed from the high pressure side of peristaltic pump 54 to the low pressure side. In this mode, while the aspiration material flows through holding tank 56 and eventually into collection bag 62, the holding tank pressure may have little or no effect on the flow rate. When peristaltic pump 54 is not in operation, rotation of the peristaltic pump is may be inhibited and the rotors of the peristaltic pump generally pinch the arcuate resilient tubing of the probe so as to block aspiration flow. Material may then be drawn into the aspiration port of handpiece 110 by opening pinch valve 58 and engagement or operation of the vacuum system 59. When pinch valve 58 is open, the aspiration port draws fluid therein based on the pressure differential between holding tank 56 and the chamber of the eye in which the fluid port is disposed, with the pressure differential being reduced by the total pressure loss of the aspiration flow along the aspiration path between the tank and port. In this mode, venting or reflux of the handpiece 110 may be accomplished by opening the solenoid vent valve 44, which pressurizes the holding tank 56 to increase the tank pressure and push fluid back towards (i.e., “vents”) the tubing and/or handpiece 110.
In some embodiments, the vent valve 44 may be used to increase the pressure inside the tank 56 to at or near atmospheric pressure. Alternatively, venting of the handpiece 110 may be accomplished in this mode by closing pinch valve 58, and by rotation peristaltic pump 54 in reverse (e.g., clockwise in
The present design effectively splits the aspiration line from handpiece 110 into at least two separate fluid pathways where one is connected to collector 206 and the other to the air/fluid reservoir 204, which is also connected to collector 206. Splitting the fluid pathways in this way allows one line designated for vacuum regulated aspiration, venting, and/or reflux and the other line designated for peristaltic aspiration, venting, and/or reflux. However, the aspiration line, or the at least two separate fluid pathways may be connected with air/fluid reservoir 204. The vacuum regulated aspiration line 226 connects to reservoir 204, wherein fluid may be aspirated, vented, and/or refluxed to or from reservoir 204 through the line 226. The peristaltic line connects directly to the collector and aspirates, vents, and/or refluxes through the aspiration line 223, 225 without requiring a connection to reservoir 204.
Surgical cassette venting system 200 may include a fluid vacuum sensor 201, flow selector valve 202, reservoir 204, collector 206, and fluid pathways, such as interconnecting surgical tubing, as shown in
Cassette arrangement 250 is illustrated in
Referring to
The flow selector valve 202 illustrated in
Thus while a single flow selector valve 202 is illustrated in
It is also envisioned that flow selector valve 202 may be or comprise one or more pinch valves. The one or more pinch valves may be located along fluid pathway 221 and/or 223, or any other fluid pathway as discussed herein. Further, there may be one or more fluid pathways couples with handpiece 110 and extending to various components of cassette arrangement 250, including a first fluid pathway from fluid vacuum sensor 201 to collector 206 via pump 203 and/or a second fluid pathway to reservoir 204. In another embodiment, fluid pathway 220 is a single fluid pathway that couples with fluid vacuum sensor 201. From fluid vacuum sensor 201, the single fluid pathway 220 may divide into two fluid pathways, one to collector 206 via pump 203 and one to reservoir 204. Further, one or more pinch valves and/or flow selector valve 202 may be located along the fluid pathway between fluid vacuum sensor 201 and collector 206 and/or between fluid vacuum sensor 201 and reservoir 204.
The present design's fluid vacuum sensor 201, for example a strain gauge or other suitable component, may communicate or signal information to instrument host 102 to provide the amount of vacuum sensed in the handpiece fluid pathway 220. Instrument host 102 may determine the actual amount of vacuum present based on the communicated information.
Fluid vacuum sensor 201 monitors vacuum in the line, and can be used to determine when flow should be reversed, such as encountering a certain pressure level (e.g. in the presence of an occlusion), and based on values obtained from the fluid vacuum sensor 201, the system may control selector valve 202 and the pumps illustrated or open the line to reflux from irrigation. It is to be understood that while components presented in
With respect to fluid vacuum sensor 201, emergency conditions such as a dramatic drop or rise in pressure may result in a type of fail-safe operation. The present design employs fluid vacuum sensor 201 to monitor the vacuum conditions and provide signals representing vacuum conditions to the system such as via instrument host 102 for the purpose of controlling components shown including but not limited to flow selector valve 202 and the pumps shown. Alternative embodiments may include flow sensors (not shown).
Multiple aspiration and ventilation options are available in the design of
In the arrangement where the cassette system flow selector valve 202 connects handpiece 110 with reservoir 204, the present design allows for aspiration from eye 114 directly to reservoir 204 as indicated by directional flow arrow ‘X’ 238, and arrow C 240 in
Although venting is shown from BSS bottle 112, venting and/or irrigation is not represented in
Reservoir 204 may contain air in section 211 and fluid in section 212. Surgical cassette system 200 may connect reservoir 204 with collector 206 using fluid pathways, such as surgical tubing or similar items. In this arrangement, pump 205 may operate in a clockwise direction in the direction of arrow 228 to remove fluid from the reservoir 204 through fluid pathway 227 and deliver the fluid to collector 206 using fluid pathway 229. The present design illustrates a peristaltic pump as pump 205, a component within instrument host 102, but other types of pumps may be employed. This configuration may enable the surgical cassette 200 to remove unwanted fluid and/or material from reservoir 204.
The fluid pathways or flow segments of surgical cassette system 200 may include the fluid connections, for example flexible tubing, between each component represented with solid lines in
Vacuum pump arrangement 207 is typically a component within instrument host 102, and may be connected with reservoir 204 via fluid pathway or flow segment 230. In the configuration shown, vacuum pump arrangement 207 includes a pump 208, such as a venturi pump and an optional pressure regulator 209 (and valve (not shown)), but other configurations are possible. In this arrangement, vacuum pump arrangement 207 may operate to remove air from the top of reservoir 204 and deliver the air to atmosphere (not shown). Removal of air from reservoir 204 in this manner may reduce the pressure within the reservoir, which reduces the pressure in the attached fluid pathway 226, to a level less than the pressure within eye 114. A lower reservoir pressure connected through flow selector valve 202 may cause fluid to move from the eye, thereby providing aspiration. The vacuum pump arrangement 207 and reservoir 204 can be used to control fluid flow into and out of reservoir 204. Vacuum pump arrangement 207 may also be used to vent the aspiration line to air by opening a valve to the venturi pump.
The optional pressure regulator 209 may operate to add air to the top of reservoir 204 which in turn increases pressure and may force the air-fluid boundary 213 to move downward. Adding air into reservoir 204 in this manner may increase the air pressure within the reservoir, which increases the pressure in the attached fluid aspiration line 226 to a level greater than the pressure within eye 114. A higher reservoir pressure connected through flow selector valve 203 may cause fluid to move toward eye 114, thereby providing venting or reflux.
An alternate method of creating positive pressure in reservoir 204 is running pump 205 in a counter-clockwise direction. Running pump 205 in a counter-clockwise direction will increase the amount of air in section 211 in reservoir 204.
It is to be noted that higher pressure in reservoir 204 causes more fluid flow and potentially more reflux from reservoir 204 to handpiece 110. If the lines from the reservoir 204 are plugged or otherwise occluded, providing pressure to reservoir 204 can result in venting and/or reflux. Venting in this context results in the release of pressure. Reflux occurs when a pump is reversed sending fluid in the opposite direction of normal flow (e.g. toward the eye). In a reflux condition, the surgeon can control the amount of fluid flowing back through the fluid pathways and components.
The present design may involve peristaltic operation, aspirating fluid from eye 114 to collector 206 illustrated in
In the arrangement where the flow selector valve 202 connects handpiece 110 with BSS bottle 112, the present design may allow for venting of fluid to eye 114 directly from BSS bottle 112 and/or the line between flow selector valve 202 and BSS bottle 112, where fluid from BSS bottle 112 and/or the line flows toward and through flow selector valve 202. The fluid flow continues to flow toward and through flow selector valve 202 in the direction indicated by arrow 321. In order to vent from BSS bottle 112, instrument host 102 may signal flow selector valve 202 to connect port ‘0’ to port ‘1’. When the flow selector valve 202 switches to position ‘1,’ fluid may flow from BSS bottle 112 and/or the line between BSS bottle 112 and flow selector valve 202 to handpiece 110 as indicated by directional arrows 322 and 321 as shown in
In the configuration of
The present design may alternately employ vacuum pump arrangement 207 to aspirate fluid from eye 114 to reservoir 204 as illustrated in
In sum, the present design surgical cassette system provides for aspiration, venting, and/or reflux using pumping operations. A plurality of pumps are typically employed, including a first pump and a second pump, where a first pump may be pump 203, shown as a peristaltic pump in
The instrument host 102 may provide a signal to position or switch flow selector valve 202 for desired peristaltic or vacuum regulated operation. Aspiration, venting, and/or reflux may be controlled in various ways, including but not limited to switching offered to the surgeon on the instrument host 102, switching via a switch such as one provided on handpiece 110 or via a footswitch, or via automatic or semi-automatic operation, wherein pressure is sensed at some point, such as coming from the handpiece to the instrument host at sensor 201 or separately sensed by a sensor placed in the ocular region with pressure signals being provided to the instrument host 102. In general, automatic or semi-automatic operation entails sensing a drop or rise in pressure and either aspirating fluid to or venting fluid from the ocular region or eye 114. In any circumstance, the surgeon or other personnel are provided with the ability to run the pumps in any available direction, such as for cleaning purposes.
Other pumping states may be provided as discussed herein and based on the desires of personnel performing the surgical procedure. For example, in the case of the surgeon desiring aspiration operation as shown in
Certain additional functionality or components may be provided in the current design. For example, a valve (not shown) may be located between pump 203 and flow selector valve 202 or between pump 203 and handpiece 112 in the design, such as in the design of
Referring to
Phacoemulsification probes may optimally work with a sufficiently occluded aspiration port, as the ultrasound tip may then engage the target tissue. However, low aspiration rates are typically not strong enough to bring particles to the probe. Insufficient occlusion may be detected by sensing pressure or flow changes, or no changes within the aspiration channel. Examples of sensing occlusion through pressure differentials are shown in co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/461,741, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
If the probe is sufficiently occluded to operate as desired, then the method 900 returns to operation 902. If the probe is insufficiently occluded then the method 900 proceeds to operation 906. At operation 906 a command signal is generated to switch from the first pump to a second pump, which may be a pressure pump (e.g. venturi pump) or a volumetric pump (e.g. peristaltic). At operation 908 the second pump, operating at a second flow-flow rate (e.g. high flow-rate), aspirates via the probe which is in a region of the eye to help draw in cataract particles. At operation 910 it is determined whether the probe is insufficiently occluded. If the probe is insufficiently occluded, then the method 900 returns to operation 908. If the probe is sufficiently occluded, then a command signal is generated in operation 912 to switch from the second pump to the first pump, and the method 900 reverts to operation 902. According to an embodiment, a processor may be configured to, during pumping of aspiration flow along the aspiration pathway at the first pump rate and in response to insufficient occlusion of the aspiration pathway, generate a command signal so as to induce pumping of the aspiration flow along the aspiration pathway at the second pump rate. Further, the processor may be configured to provide a second command signal to energize the distal tip with ultrasound energy or increase the ultrasound energy at the distal tip during sufficient occlusion of the distal tip at the first pump rate. The second pump rate may be applied for a predetermined time in response to the second command signal. The second command signal may be generated in response to a change in flow rate and/or vacuum, e.g. in response to a pressure differential along the aspiration pathway being less than a threshold; or an increase or decrease in flow rate and/or vacuum. The threshold may be determined by the user or created a program default.
As used herein, the first pump and the second pump may comprise a flow-based pump and/or a vacuum based pump, e.g. the first pump may comprise a vacuum based pump and the second pump may comprise a flow-based pump or vice versa or the first pump and the second pump may comprise the same type of pump.
According to an embodiment, a system may comprise a first pump and a second pump, wherein the first pump is a flow based pump and the second pump is a vacuum based pump. During a procedure a surgeon may use the first pump to aspirate irrigation fluid and/or material from the eye and upon detection of an occlusion, the second pump is turned on or increased. Turning on the second pump or increasing the vacuum level of the second pump allows the occlusion to be held against the distal end of the tip of the handpiece. Without being limited to a particular theory, holding the occlusion tightly to the distal end of the tip of the handpiece may assist with breaking up of lens material (occlusion) and provide more user control over the lens material.
The methods and devices disclosed herein may also be used with co-assigned and concurrently filed U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/198,626, entitled AUTOMATICALLY SWITCHING DIFFERENT ASPIRATION LEVELS AND/OR PUMPS TO AN OCULAR PROBE, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
It should be noted that the examples disclosed herein may describe low-flow rate pumps as peristaltic pumps, and high flow-rate pumps as venturi pumps. These are merely examples and are not limiting to the embodiments disclosed herein, for example high-flow rate peristaltic pumps may be used in lieu of high flow-rate venturi pumps, and low flow-rate venturi pumps may be used in lieu of low-flow rate pumps peristaltic pumps. Additionally, a low flow-rate venturi pump may be used in conjunction with a high flow-rate venturi pump, and a low flow-rate peristaltic pump may be used in conjunction with a high flow-rate peristaltic pump.
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application is claims priority to and is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/614,013, filed Nov. 6, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. Application No. 61/198,658, filed on Nov. 7, 2008, the entirety of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1848024 | Owen | Mar 1932 | A |
2123781 | Huber | Jul 1938 | A |
2990616 | Balamuth et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3076904 | Claus et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3116697 | Theodore | Jan 1964 | A |
3439680 | Thomas, Jr. | Apr 1969 | A |
3526219 | Lewis | Sep 1970 | A |
3781142 | Zweig | Dec 1973 | A |
3857387 | Shock | Dec 1974 | A |
4017828 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4037491 | Newbold | Jul 1977 | A |
4189286 | Murry et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4193004 | Lobdell et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4247784 | Henry | Jan 1981 | A |
4276023 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4286464 | Tauber et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4479760 | Bilstad et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4537561 | Xanthopoulos | Aug 1985 | A |
4564342 | Weber et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4590934 | Malis et al. | May 1986 | A |
4662829 | Nehring | May 1987 | A |
4665621 | Ackerman et al. | May 1987 | A |
4706687 | Rogers et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713051 | Steppe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4757814 | Wang et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4758238 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4772263 | Dorman et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773897 | Scheller et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4818186 | Pastrone et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4819317 | Bauer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4837857 | Scheller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4920336 | Meijer | Apr 1990 | A |
4921477 | Davis | May 1990 | A |
4925444 | Orkin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933843 | Scheller et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941518 | Williams et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4954960 | Lo et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961424 | Kubota et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4965417 | Massie | Oct 1990 | A |
4983901 | Lehmer | Jan 1991 | A |
4998972 | Chin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006110 | Garrison et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5020535 | Parker et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026387 | Thomas | Jun 1991 | A |
5032939 | Mihara et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039973 | Carballo | Aug 1991 | A |
5091656 | Gahn | Feb 1992 | A |
5108367 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110270 | Morrick | May 1992 | A |
5125891 | Hossain et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5160317 | Costin | Nov 1992 | A |
5195960 | Hossain et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195961 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195971 | Sirhan | Mar 1993 | A |
5230614 | Zanger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242404 | Conley et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249121 | Baum et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5267956 | Beuchat | Dec 1993 | A |
5268624 | Zanger | Dec 1993 | A |
5271379 | Phan et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282787 | Wortrich | Feb 1994 | A |
5323543 | Steen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342293 | Zanger | Aug 1994 | A |
5350357 | Kamen et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351676 | Dutman | Oct 1994 | A |
5354268 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5378126 | Abrahamson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388569 | Kepley | Feb 1995 | A |
5429601 | Conley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445506 | Afflerbaugh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454783 | Grieshaber et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464391 | Devale | Nov 1995 | A |
5470211 | Knott et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470312 | Zanger et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5499969 | Beuchat et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520652 | Peterson | May 1996 | A |
5533976 | Zaleski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549461 | Newland | Aug 1996 | A |
5554894 | Sepielli | Sep 1996 | A |
5561575 | Eways | Oct 1996 | A |
5569188 | Mackool | Oct 1996 | A |
5580347 | Reimels | Dec 1996 | A |
5591127 | Barwick et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5653887 | Wahl et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657000 | Ellingboe | Aug 1997 | A |
5676530 | Nazarifar | Oct 1997 | A |
5676649 | Boukhny et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676650 | Grieshaber et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693020 | Rauh | Dec 1997 | A |
5697898 | Devine | Dec 1997 | A |
5697910 | Cole et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700240 | Barwick, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728130 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733256 | Costin | Mar 1998 | A |
5733263 | Wheatman | Mar 1998 | A |
5745647 | Krause | Apr 1998 | A |
5746713 | Hood et al. | May 1998 | A |
5747824 | Jung et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777602 | Schaller et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805998 | Kodama | Sep 1998 | A |
5807075 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810765 | Oda | Sep 1998 | A |
5810766 | Barnitz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830176 | Mackool | Nov 1998 | A |
5843109 | Mehta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859642 | Jones | Jan 1999 | A |
5871492 | Sorensen | Feb 1999 | A |
5879298 | Drobnitzky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883615 | Fago et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899674 | Jung et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928257 | Kablik et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938655 | Bisch et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983749 | Holtorf | Nov 1999 | A |
6002484 | Rozema et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024428 | Uchikata | Feb 2000 | A |
6028387 | Boukhny | Feb 2000 | A |
6062829 | Ognier | May 2000 | A |
6077285 | Boukhny | Jun 2000 | A |
6086598 | Appelbaum et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109895 | Ray et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117126 | Appelbaum et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139320 | Hahn | Oct 2000 | A |
6150623 | Chen | Nov 2000 | A |
6159175 | Strukel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179829 | Bisch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200287 | Keller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219032 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6251113 | Appelbaum et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260434 | Holtorf | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6360630 | Holtorf | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6368269 | Lane | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411062 | Baranowski et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424124 | Ichihara et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6436072 | Kullas et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452120 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452123 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491661 | Boukhny et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511454 | Nakao et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537445 | Muller | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6561999 | Nazarifar et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6595948 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6632214 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6674030 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6780166 | Kanda et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6830555 | Rockley et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852092 | Kadziauskas et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862951 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6908451 | Brody et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6962488 | Davis et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6962581 | Thoe | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986753 | Bui | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011761 | Muller | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012203 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7070578 | Leukanech et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073083 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087049 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103344 | Menard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7167723 | Zhang | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169123 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7236766 | Freeburg | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236809 | Fischedick et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242765 | Hairston | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244240 | Nazarifar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289825 | Fors et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7300264 | Souza | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316664 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336976 | Ito | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7381917 | Dacquay et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7439463 | Brenner et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7465285 | Hutchinson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470277 | Finlay et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7526038 | McNamara | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7591639 | Kent | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7731484 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776006 | Childers et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785316 | Claus | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7811255 | Boukhny et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7883521 | Rockley et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7921017 | Claus et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967777 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
3070712 | Muri et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
8075468 | Min et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8157792 | Dolliver et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
9033940 | Muri et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9658468 | Dai | May 2017 | B2 |
20010023331 | Kanda et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010047166 | Wuchinich | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051788 | Paukovits et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004657 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007671 | Lavi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019215 | Romans | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020045887 | Dehoogh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020070840 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098859 | Murata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137007 | Beerstecher | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020179462 | Silvers | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183693 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028091 | Simon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028141 | Kadziauskas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050619 | Mooijman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083016 | Evans et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108429 | Angelini | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125717 | Whitman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030224729 | Arnold | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226091 | Platenberg et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019313 | Childers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037724 | Haser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040097868 | Kadziauskas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127840 | Gara et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193182 | Yaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040212344 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215127 | Kadziauskas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224641 | Sinn | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253129 | Sorensen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267136 | Yaguchi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050039567 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054971 | Steen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069419 | Cull et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070859 | Cull et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070871 | Lawton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095153 | Demers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103607 | Mezhinsky | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109595 | Mezhinsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118048 | Traxinger | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119679 | Rabiner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130098 | Warner | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187513 | Rabiner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197131 | Ikegami | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209552 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228266 | McCombs | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236936 | Shiv et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245888 | Cull | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261628 | Boukhny et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267504 | Boukhny et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060035585 | Washiro | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036180 | Boukhny et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041220 | Boukhny et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046659 | Haartsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074405 | Malackowski et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078448 | Holden | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114175 | Boukhny | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145540 | Mezhinsky | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060219049 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060219962 | Dancs et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224107 | Claus et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236242 | Boukhny et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016174 | Millman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049898 | Hopkins et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060926 | Escaf | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073214 | Dacquay et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073309 | Kadziauskas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078379 | Boukhny et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085611 | Gerry et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107490 | Artsyukhovich et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070231205 | Williams et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249942 | Salehi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287959 | Walter et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033342 | Staggs | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066542 | Gao | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082040 | Kubler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112828 | Muri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114290 | King et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114291 | Muri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114300 | Muri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114311 | Muri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114312 | Muri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114372 | Edwards | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114387 | Hertweck et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125695 | Hopkins et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125697 | Gao | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125698 | Gerg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129695 | Li | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146989 | Zacharias | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200878 | Davis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243105 | Horvath | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262476 | Krause et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281253 | Injev et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294087 | Steen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312594 | Urich et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005712 | Raney | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005789 | Charles | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048607 | Rockley | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087327 | Voltenburg, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124974 | Crank et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090163853 | Cull et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100036256 | Boukhny et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069825 | Raney | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069828 | Steen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100140149 | Fulkerson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152685 | Goh | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185150 | Zacharias | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249693 | Links | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280435 | Raney et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110092887 | Wong et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092924 | Wong et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092962 | Ma et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098721 | Tran et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160646 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208047 | Fago | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110251569 | Turner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110300010 | Jarnagin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120065580 | Gerg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078181 | Smith et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083735 | Pfouts | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120083736 | Pfouts et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120083800 | Andersohn | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130072853 | Wong et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130169412 | Roth | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184676 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130245543 | Gerg et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267892 | Woolford et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289475 | Muri et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303978 | Ross | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336814 | Kamen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140178215 | Baxter et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188076 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140276424 | Davis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160151564 | Magers et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006235983 | May 2007 | AU |
2662797 | Mar 2008 | CA |
3826414 | Feb 1989 | DE |
56019 | Jul 1982 | EP |
424687 | May 1991 | EP |
619993 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1010437 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1072285 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1113562 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1464310 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1469440 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1550406 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1704839 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1779879 | May 2007 | EP |
1787606 | May 2007 | EP |
1849443 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1849444 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1857128 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1310267 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1873501 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1900347 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1925274 | May 2008 | EP |
1867349 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2264369 | Dec 2006 | ES |
2230301 | Oct 1990 | GB |
2352887 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2438679 | Dec 2007 | GB |
S5724482 | Feb 1982 | JP |
S58167333 | Oct 1983 | JP |
S62204463 | Sep 1987 | JP |
2005195653 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2008188110 | Aug 2008 | JP |
9220310 | Nov 1992 | WO |
9315777 | Aug 1993 | WO |
9317729 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9317729 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9324082 | Dec 1993 | WO |
9405346 | Mar 1994 | WO |
9632144 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9737700 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9818507 | May 1998 | WO |
9917818 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0000096 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0070225 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0122696 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0226286 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0228449 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0234314 | May 2002 | WO |
03102878 | Dec 2003 | WO |
04096360 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004114180 | Dec 2004 | WO |
05084728 | Sep 2005 | WO |
05092023 | Oct 2005 | WO |
05092047 | Oct 2005 | WO |
06101908 | Sep 2006 | WO |
06125280 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007121144 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007143677 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007143797 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007149637 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008030872 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008060859 | May 2008 | WO |
2008060902 | May 2008 | WO |
2008060995 | May 2008 | WO |
2009123547 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010054146 | May 2010 | WO |
2010054225 | May 2010 | WO |
2010151704 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2012151062 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013142009 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2015009945 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/049970, dated Dec. 5, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/061648, dated Feb. 7, 2017, 12 pages. |
Boyd, “Preparing for the Transition” in: The Art and the Science of Cataract Surgery, Chapter 7, 2001, pp. 93-133. |
Definition of “Parameter”, Retrieved from the Internet: Aug. 9, 2016. |
English Human Translation of JP57024482 from Feb. 9, 1982. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP10164058, dated Jun. 25, 2010, 2 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP13184138.9, dated Oct. 24, 2013, 7 pages. |
Examination Report dated Mar. 28, 2012 for European Application No. EP09791072 filed Jul. 31, 2009, 3 pages. |
Merritt R., et al., Wireless Nets Starting to link Medical Gear [online] 2004 [retrieved on Feb. 12, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet: . |
Phacoemulsification, [online] [retrieved on Jul. 1, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: , 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/066036, dated Jul. 4, 2016, 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160095747 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61198658 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12614013 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 14967232 | US |