This application claims priority from German Application DE 10 2005 043 482.7 filed on Sep. 13, 2005 the contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 is hereby claimed.
The invention relates to an automation device, with which a multiplicity of physically distributed functional units communicate with each other by means of a common transmission protocol. These functional units manifest themselves as field devices or operator units according to their automation function.
For some time now it has been common practice in instrumentation and control engineering to use a two-wire line to supply a field device and to transfer measurements from this field device to a display device and/or to an automation control system, or transfer control values from an automation control system to the field device. Each measurement or control value is converted into a proportional DC current, which is superimposed on the DC supply current, where the DC current representing the measurement or control value can be a multiple of the DC supply current. Thus the supply current consumption of the field device is usually set to approximately 4 mA, and the dynamic range of the measurement or control value is mapped onto currents between 0 and 16 mA, so that the known 4 to 20 mA current loop can be used.
More recent field devices also feature universal properties that are largely adaptable to the given process. For this purpose, an AC transmission path capable of bi-directional operation is provided in parallel with the unidirectional DC transmission path, via which parameterization data are transferred in the direction to the field device and measurements and status data are transferred from the direction of the field device. The parameterization data and the measurements and status data are modulated on an AC voltage, preferably frequency modulated.
In process control engineering, it is common in the field area as it is called, to arrange and link field devices, i.e. measurement, control and display modules, locally according to the specified safety requirements. These field devices have analog and digital interfaces for data transfer between them, where data transfer takes place via the supply lines of the power supply arranged in the control area. Operator units are also provided in the control area, as it is called, for controlling and diagnosing these field devices remotely, where lower safety requirements normally apply.
Data transfer between the operator units in the control area and the field devices is implemented using FSK modulation (Frequency Shift Keying) superimposed on the known 20 mA current loops, where two frequencies, assigned to the binary states “0” and “1”, are transferred in frames as analog signals.
The general conditions for the FSK signal and the type of modulation are specified in the “HART Physical Layer Specification Revision 7.1-Final” dated 20 Jun. 1990 (Rosemount Document no. D8900097; Revision B).
ASICs specifically developed to implement the FSK interface according to the HART protocol, such as the HT2012 from the SMAR company, are commercially available and in common use. The disadvantage with these special circuits is the permanently fixed range of functions and the associated lack of flexibility to adapt to changing requirements.
Known modern automation devices are usually equipped with a processing unit known as a microcontroller, which is used to perform the correct data processing for the automation task of the functional unit concerned.
The aim is to reproduce the functions of the FSK interface according to the HART protocol in the controller of the processing unit of the automation devices, without impairing in the process the automation task of the functional unit concerned.
Hence the object of the invention is specifically to define an automation device having means for converting an FSK signal into a data bit-stream using a microcontroller known per se.
The invention is based on an automation device having a processing unit, which is assigned at least one memory unit for storing instructions and data. Connected to this processing unit is a digital-to-analog converter whose output is connected to a filter.
To reconstruct the received data bit-stream from the FSK-modulated line signal, provision is made of a demodulation device having a cascade circuit comprising a monoflop, a sampling device, a low-pass filter and a comparator. The hold time of the monoflop is set to just half the period duration of the higher signal frequency.
The output signal from the monoflop is sampled periodically. The resultant bit stream is led via the low-pass filter and the comparator. The reconstructed data bit-stream is then output.
The inventive type of demodulation is advantageously distinguished by high interference immunity.
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment. In the drawings required for this,
The automation device 100 is connected via a communications line 200 to an automation device 100′ of substantially the same type. The communications line 200 is used bi-directionally. The information sent by the automation device 100 is received by the automation device 100′, and vice versa. Hence reference is only made below to the automation device 100 shown in detail.
A core component of the automation device 100 is a controller 110, which is connected at least to one memory unit 150 and one timing element, referred to below as a clock generator 120 for the sake of simplicity. Usually, however, parts of the clock generator 120 are already implemented in the controller 110.
The controller 110 has connections for connecting a data sink 130 and a data source 140.
A configurable and/or parameterizable sensor for converting a physical variable into an electrical variable can be provided as the data source 140, in which case the configuration and/or parameterization is the data sink 130.
In an alternative embodiment, it can be provided that the data sink 130 is an actuator for converting an electrical variable into a physical variable whose properties can be diagnosed. The diagnostic device provided for this purpose is then the data source 140.
In a further embodiment, it can be provided that the automation device 100 is part of a higher-level device designed for bi-directional communication with additional automation devices 100′. In this embodiment, the higher-level device is both the data source 140 and the data sink 130.
In a further embodiment, the automation device 100 can be designed as a “protocol converter”. In this embodiment, the data source 140 and the data sink 130 are formed by a second communications system.
To implement the invention, however, it is sufficient for the data source 140 to be present without the data sink 130.
In addition, connected to the controller 110 is a digital-to-analog converter 160 whose output is connected to a filter 170. The output of the filter 170 is connected to the communications line 200. In addition, the communications line 200 is taken to the input terminals of the controller 110, via which terminals it is provided that the line signal on the communications line 200 is received.
The method of operation of the invention will be explained in more detail below. To this end,
To reconstruct the received data bit-stream from the FSK-modulated line signal, provision is made of a demodulation device 180 having a cascade circuit comprising a monoflop 181, a sampling device 182, a low-pass filter 183 and a comparator 184. The hold time of the monoflop 181 is set to just half the period duration of the higher signal frequency.
The output signal from the monoflop 181 is sampled periodically. The resultant bit stream is led via the low-pass filter 183 and the comparator 184. The reconstructed data bit-stream is then output.
In a special refinement of the invention, the monoflop 181 is in the form of a timer for the controller 110.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 043 482 | Sep 2005 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4075558 | Harzer | Feb 1978 | A |
4099030 | Hirata | Jul 1978 | A |
4104637 | Nielson | Aug 1978 | A |
4259648 | Farrow | Mar 1981 | A |
4287565 | Haubner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4438523 | Brandl | Mar 1984 | A |
4521879 | Gueldenpfennig et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4533874 | Fischer | Aug 1985 | A |
4541110 | Hopf et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4549044 | Durham | Oct 1985 | A |
4586121 | Gilliam | Apr 1986 | A |
4663709 | Fujiwara et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672361 | Kokubo et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4724534 | Guzman-Edery et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4749962 | Doornenbal | Jun 1988 | A |
4773083 | Baumbach et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5048058 | Kaleh | Sep 1991 | A |
5103463 | Schoeneberg | Apr 1992 | A |
5121723 | Stepper et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5124976 | Lemaistre et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5225787 | Therssen | Jul 1993 | A |
5230012 | Schenk | Jul 1993 | A |
5233642 | Renton | Aug 1993 | A |
5235622 | Yoshida | Aug 1993 | A |
5239974 | Ebinger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5260975 | Saito | Nov 1993 | A |
5341249 | Abbott et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341379 | Crisp | Aug 1994 | A |
5555531 | Booth et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5584619 | Guzzella | Dec 1996 | A |
5602879 | Wada | Feb 1997 | A |
5652755 | Carey | Jul 1997 | A |
5661759 | Tulai | Aug 1997 | A |
5710721 | Rieckhoff et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
5789991 | Ishii | Aug 1998 | A |
5920715 | Heckel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963332 | Feldman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6107763 | Rossi | Aug 2000 | A |
6230021 | Ohdachi | May 2001 | B1 |
6278357 | Croushore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286020 | Eastty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307490 | Litfin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308057 | Hayashi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6438176 | Haran et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6629059 | Borgeson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650712 | Leonidov et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675236 | Moon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6759954 | Myron et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813318 | Westfield et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6888879 | Lennen | May 2005 | B1 |
6889282 | Schollenberger | May 2005 | B2 |
6904476 | Hedtke | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6959356 | Packwood et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7012561 | Toennesen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027952 | Dela Cruz et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050525 | Adachi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7358781 | Kresse et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359812 | Kresse et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372914 | Calvin | May 2008 | B2 |
7386052 | Kresse et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7426452 | Zielinski et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447552 | Kresse et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7864675 | Kresse et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20010030997 | Yang et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020101943 | Proctor | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030065855 | Wester | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040146126 | Wheatley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151269 | Balakrishnan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040239525 | Kobayashi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050072227 | Carter | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089120 | Quinlan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129147 | Cannon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050195093 | Karschnia et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264446 | Underbrink et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070115851 | Kresse et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115852 | Kresse et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116133 | Kresse et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118686 | Kresse et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136538 | Kresse et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150625 | Kresse et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150626 | Kresse et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070136538 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |