The present invention relates to automatic management of data elements.
The following patent publications are believed to represent the current state of the art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,465,387; 5,899,991; 6,338,082; 6,393,468; 6,928,439; 7,031,984; 7,068,592; 7,403,925; 7,421,740; 7,555,482, 7,606,801 and 7,743,420; and
U.S. Published Patent Application Nos.: 2003/0051026; 2004/0249847; 2005/0108206; 2005/0203881; 2005/0086529; 2006/0064313; 2006/0184530; 2006/0184459; 2007/0203872; 2007/0244899; 2008/0271157; 2009/0100058; 2009/0119298 and 2009/0265780.
The present invention provides improved systems and methodologies for automatic management of data elements.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an information technology management system for use in enterprise data management including a metadata supply subsystem which receives metadata from a network, an access permissions management subsystem employing at least part of the metadata for managing access permissions to data elements in the network and an access permissions management operation implementation subsystem which automatically governs the operation of the access permissions management subsystem, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem having at least one of first, second, third and fourth modes of operation. The first mode of operation includes operating the access permissions management subsystem to change access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating actual changes in access permissions, the second mode of operation includes simulating the operation of the access permissions management subsystem in changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating simulated changes in access permissions, the third mode of operation included providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating the operation of the access permissions management subsystem and the fourth mode of operation includes providing an actionable report of multiple steps in implementation of proposed changes in access permissions to data elements for approval of each of the multiple steps by respective persons before automatic execution of the multiple steps.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem has at least two of the first, the second, the third and the fourth modes of operation. More preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem has at least three of the first, the second, the third and the fourth modes of operation. Most preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem has the first, the second, the third and the fourth modes of operation.
Preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem includes at least one of access permissions modification task scope granularity selection functionality operative to enable selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, access permissions modification task scheduling granularity selection functionality operative to enable selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, access permissions modification granularity selection functionality operative to enable selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, access permissions modification execution mode granularity selection functionality operative to enable selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and access permissions modification task approval functionality operative to enable approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons. More preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem includes at least two of the access permissions modification task scope granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification task scheduling granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification execution mode granularity selection functionality, and the access permissions modification task approval functionality.
Even more preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem includes at least three of the access permissions modification task scope granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification task scheduling granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification execution mode granularity selection functionality, and the access permissions modification task approval functionality. Even more preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem includes at least four of the access permissions modification task scope granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification task scheduling granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification execution mode granularity selection functionality, and the access permissions modification task approval functionality.
Most preferably, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem includes the access permissions modification task scope granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification task scheduling granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification granularity selection functionality, the access permissions modification execution mode granularity selection functionality, and the access permissions modification task approval functionality.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the access permissions modification task is a remediation process.
Preferably, the scope is defined by a set of rules based on at least one of metadata associated with data elements, content of data elements and actual access to data elements. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the selectable schedule is one of a future one-time execution schedule and a repetitive schedule. Preferably, the selectable granularity is one of full execution and step-by-step execution. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the selectable execution mode is one of actual execution, simulation of execution and generation of a report of proposed execution.
Preferably, the respective persons are corresponding owners of the data elements. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the metadata relates to at least one of actual access, access permissions and content of each of the data elements.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the third mode of operation includes providing a report of user selectable granularity of proposed changes in access permissions.
There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an information technology management method for use in enterprise data management including receiving metadata from a network, employing at least part of the metadata for managing access permissions to data elements in the network, automatically governing the employing at least part of the metadata for managing access permissions to data elements in the network and at least one of changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating actual changes in access permissions, simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating simulated changes in access permissions, providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and providing an actionable report of multiple steps in implementation of proposed changes in access permissions to data elements for approval of each of the multiple steps by respective persons before automatic execution of the multiple steps.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management includes at least two of changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating actual changes in access permissions, simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating simulated changes in access permissions, providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and providing an actionable report of multiple steps in implementation of proposed changes in access permissions to data elements for approval of each of the multiple steps by respective persons before automatic execution of the multiple steps. More preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management includes at least three of changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating actual changes in access permissions, simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating simulated changes in access permissions, providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and providing an actionable report of multiple steps in implementation of proposed changes in access permissions to data elements for approval of each of the multiple steps by respective persons before automatic execution of the multiple steps.
Most preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management includes changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating actual changes in access permissions, simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and thereafter providing a report indicating simulated changes in access permissions, providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network and providing an actionable report of multiple steps in implementation of proposed changes in access permissions to data elements for approval of each of the multiple steps by respective persons before automatic execution of the multiple steps.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management also includes at least one of selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and enabling approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
More preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management also includes at least two of selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and enabling approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
Even more preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management also includes at least three of selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and enabling approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
Even more preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management also includes at least four of selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and enabling approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
Most preferably, the information technology management method for use in enterprise data management also includes selection of a selectable scope of an access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable schedule of the access permissions modification task, selection of selectable granularity of the access permissions modification task, selection of a selectable execution mode of the access permissions modification task and enabling approval of the access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
Preferably, the access permissions modification task is a remediation process.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the scope is defined by a set of rules based on at least one of metadata associated with data elements, content of data elements and actual access to data elements.
Preferably, the selectable schedule is one of a future one-time execution schedule and a repetitive schedule.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the selectable granularity is one of full execution and step-by-step execution.
Preferably, the selectable execution mode is one of actual execution, simulation of execution and generation of a report of proposed execution.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the respective persons are corresponding owners of the data elements.
Preferably, the metadata relates to at least one of actual access, access permissions and content of each of the data elements.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the providing a report of proposed changes in access permissions without first simulating changing access permissions to at least some of the data elements in the network includes providing a report of user selectable granularity of proposed changes in access permissions.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
The term “access permissions” as used throughout is used in a broader sense to include not only access permissions as is commonly used which is to allow the user to access a data element at his initiative, but also to include indirect access permissions, such as access to a user group that has access permissions appertaining thereto or distribution lists associated therewith. The term “access permissions” is defined herein also to include ownership of a data element in the sense of responsibility for the authorization of permissions to the data element, and a subscription to automatically generate reports based on the user's access relationship with data elements which are the subject of those data reports.
Preferably, the metadata relates to at least one of actual access, access permissions and content of each of the data elements.
The access permissions management operation implementation subsystem preferably has at least one of the flowing first, second, third and fourth modes of operation:
As shown in
After selecting the access permissions modification task to be automatically executed, the user configures task-specific parameters (102). The parameters may include, for example, user groups to remediate and the file servers on which to perform the remediation.
Thereafter, the user defines the scope of the access permissions modification task (104). The scope may be defined by a set of rules based on, for example, any combination of metadata associated with the data elements, content of the data elements and actual access to the data elements.
Thereafter, the user defines the granularity of the access permissions modification task (106). The granularity of the access permissions modification task can be defined as full execution of the task or step-by-step execution of the task, whereby each step of the execution of the task requires user or owner approval before proceeding to the subsequent step of the task.
In a case where full execution is selected, the user then defines the execution mode of the task (120). The execution mode may be, for example, one of actual execution of the task, simulation of the execution of the task, or generation of a report of proposed modifications. The user also defines the scheduling of the task (122). The scheduling may be defined, for example, as a future, one-time, execution, or a repetitive task.
At a scheduled time, the access permissions management subsystem preferably utilizes metadata from the network to compile a list of actions (124) according to the predefined task-specific parameters and the predefined scope of scope of the access permissions modification task. Thereafter the task is executed (126), and, if requested, the access permissions management operation implementation subsystem generates a report indicating actual or simulated access permissions modifications made by the access permissions management subsystem.
In a case where step-by-step execution is selected, the user selects a list of reviewers and authorizers for the task (130) and defines the scheduling of the task (132).
At the scheduled time, the access permissions management subsystem preferably utilizes metadata from the network to compile a list of actions (134) according to the predefined task-specific parameters and the predefined scope of execution of the access permissions modification task. An access permissions modification task may be, for example, a remediation process such as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Applications 61/348,806 and 61/348,860, owned by the assignee and incorporated by reference herein.
The list of actions is sent to each of the preselected reviewers and authorizers (136), asking them to approve each action. Once responses from the authorizers and reviewers are collected, the system executes the task in accordance with the approved actions (138).
Reference is now made to
Information technology management system 200 preferably includes a metadata supply subsystem 210 which receives metadata from network 202, an access permissions management subsystem 212 employing at least part of the metadata for managing access permissions to data elements in network 202, and an access permissions management operation implementation subsystem 214 which automatically governs the operation of the access permissions management subsystem 212.
Preferably, access permissions management operation implementation subsystem 214 includes access permissions modification task scope definition functionality 220 operative to enable definition of a scope of an access permissions modification task, access permissions modification task scheduling definition functionality 222 operative to enable definition of a schedule of an access permissions modification task, access permissions modification granularity definition functionality 224 operative to enable definition of the granularity of an access permissions modification task, access permissions modification execution mode definition functionality 226 operative to enable definition of an execution mode of an access permissions modification task, and access permissions modification task approval functionality 228 operative to enable approval of an access permissions modification task by the respective persons.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the invention also includes various combinations and subcombinations of the features described hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing and which are not in the prior art.
Reference is made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/348,806, filed May 27, 2010 and entitled “AUTOMATING ENFORCEMENT OF IT WORKFLOWS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (4) and (5)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/348,860, filed May 27, 2010 and entitled “IMPROVED TOOLS FOR DATA MANAGEMENT BY IT ADMINISTRATORS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (4) and (5)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/014,762, filed Jan. 27, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,023, filed May 12, 2011, and entitled “AUTOMATIC RESOURCE OWNERSHIP ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a) (1) and (2)(i). Reference is also made to the following patents and patent applications, owned by assignee, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,555,482 and 7,606,801; U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. 2007/0244899, 2008/0271157, 2009/0100058, 2009/0119298; 2009/0265780; 2011/0060916 and 2011/0061111; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/673,691.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2011/000407 | 5/26/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/20/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/148375 | 12/1/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5465387 | Mukherjee | Nov 1995 | A |
5889952 | Hunnicutt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899991 | Karch | May 1999 | A |
6308173 | Glasser et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338082 | Schneider | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6393468 | McGee | May 2002 | B1 |
6772350 | Belani et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6928439 | Satoh | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7017183 | Frey et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031984 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068592 | Duvaut et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7403925 | Schlesinger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421740 | Fey et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7555482 | Korkus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7606801 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7716240 | Lim | May 2010 | B2 |
7743420 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7937393 | Prahlad et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8041749 | Beck | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8239925 | Faitelson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266702 | Naldurg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8621610 | Oberheide et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8639724 | Sorenson et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8667556 | Chang et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8775944 | Hayton | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20030048301 | Menninger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030231207 | Huang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030915 | Sameshima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040186809 | Schlesinger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040249847 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254919 | Giuseppini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050086529 | Buchsbaum | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108206 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120054 | Shulman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203881 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246762 | Girouard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278334 | Fey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060064313 | Steinbarth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060184459 | Parida | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184530 | Song et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060277184 | Faitelson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061487 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073698 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094265 | Korkus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101387 | Hua et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112743 | Giampaolo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156659 | Lim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156693 | Soin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203872 | Flinn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244899 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266006 | Buss | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282855 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294258 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034402 | Botz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080162707 | Beck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172720 | Botz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080270462 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271157 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090100058 | Faitelson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119298 | Faitelson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150981 | Amies et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198892 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249446 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265780 | Korkus et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090320088 | Gill et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023491 | Huang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037324 | Grant et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058434 | Chusing et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070881 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110060916 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061111 | Faitelson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184989 | Faitelson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110247074 | Manring et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120221550 | Korkus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120291100 | Faitelson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1588889 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1 248 178 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2011030324 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011148375 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000902. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 1.0, Aug. 30, 2005; 71 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.0, Aug. 24, 2006; 118 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.5, Nov. 27, 2006; 124 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2.6, Dec. 15, 2006; 127 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 2,7, Feb. 6, 2007; 131 pages. |
Varonis; DatAdvantage User Guide, Version 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007; 153 pages. |
Varonis; A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 2.7, Feb. 6, 2007; 1 page. |
Varonis; A List of database tables in DatAdvantage 3.0, Jun. 20, 2007; 1 page. |
Sara C. Madeira; “Clustering, Fuzzy Clustering and Biclustering: An Overview”, pp. 31-53, Jun. 27, 2003. |
Sara C. Madeira, et al; “Biclustering Algorithms for Biological Data Analysis: A Survey”, IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 1, No. 1, Jan.-Mar. 2004; pp. 24-45; http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr05/cos598E/bib/bicluster.pdf. |
Varonis; “Accelerating Audits with Automation: Understanding Who's Accessing Your Unstructured Data”, Oct. 8, 2007; 7 pages. |
Varonis; “Entitlement Review: A Practitioner's Guide” 16 pages; Copyright 2007 by Varonis Systems. |
Varonis; “The Business Case for Data Governance” Mar. 27, 2007, 8 pages. |
Alex Woodie; “Varonis Prevents Unauthorized Access to Unstructured Data”, Four Hundred Stuff, vol. 7, No. 29, Jul. 31, 2007, 3 pages. |
S.R. Kleiman; “Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX”, ; Usenix Association: Summer Conference Proceedings, Atlanta 1986; 10 pages. |
Sahadeb De, et al; “Secure Access Control in a Multi-user Geodatabase”, available on the Internet at URL http://www10.giscafe.com. 2005, 10 pages. |
Edgar Weippl, et al; “Content-based Management of Document Access Control”, 14th International Conference on Applications of Prolog (INAP), 2001, 9 pages. |
Findutils; GNU Project Free Software Foundation (FSF), 3 pages, Nov. 2006. |
GENUNIX; “Writing Filesystems—VFS and Vnode interfaces”, 5 pages, Oct. 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/673,691, filed Feb. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/688,486, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/348,806, filed May 27, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61,348,860, filed May, 27, 2010. |
German Office Action dated Sep. 14, 1612 issued during prosecution of German Patent Application 11 2006 001 378.5. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Feb. 12, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
USPTO FOA mailed Aug. 1, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/258,256. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Oct. 31, 2008 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,736. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Dec. 14, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/786,522. |
USPTO NFOA mailed Jul. 9, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
USPTO FOA mailed Dec. 14, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,884. |
USPTO NFOA dated Sep. 16, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
USPTO FOA dated Apr. 28, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/871,028. |
USPTO NFOA dated Sep. 14, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,967. |
USPTO NFOA dated Jul. 11, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/014,762. |
USPTO RR dated Nov. 21, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,023. |
ISR dated May 23, 2011 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL11/00065. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated May 20, 2010 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL10/00069. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated May 24, 2011 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL11/00077. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2012 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL11/00902. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Nov. 2, 2011 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL11/00407. |
IPRP dated Nov. 27, 2012 issued during PCT/IL2011/000407. |
ISR and Written Opinion dated Nov. 15, 2011 issued during prosecution of PCT/IL11/00408. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120173583 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61348860 | May 2010 | US | |
61348806 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13106023 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13384452 | US | |
Parent | 13014762 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13106023 | US |