1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a running control system of an automobile which runs the automobile at an optimum velocity and space relative to a forerunning vehicle.
2. Related Background Art
Conventionally, a great many efforts and practices have been made to develop component for cruising automobiles at constant velocities and constant car-to-car spaces to simplify driving operations. For example, Japanese Non-examined Patent Publication No.7-47862 (1995) has disclosed a system which enables an automobile to cruise at a preset velocity or at an optimum car-to-car space without the driver's foot on the accelerator pedal.
Further, Japanese Non-examined Patent Publications No.7-225893 (1995) and No.9-71154 (1997) have disclosed systems which automatically start and stop automobiles, freeing the drivers from frequent operations of the brake pedal and the accelerator pedal while the automobile is running slowly. Furthermore, Japanese Non-examined Patent Publication No.10-166898 (1998) has disclosed a system which has two cruising modes (slow cruising mode and fast cruising mode) and switches between these modes to accomplish fast cruising at a preset car-to-car space and low cruising in heavy traffic conditions.
However, the conventional car-to-car space control systems have been designed to calculate an optimum car-to-car space from the velocities of the current and forerunning automobiles. Therefore, for example when finding a stationary object ahead, the automobile running at a high speed must reduce its velocity much earlier to keep an optimum space from the stationary object.
Further, when finding a stationary automobile ahead, the automobile running in the slow follow-up mode must control running to keep an optimum space from the stationary automobile.
Further, almost all drivers have wanted easier and simpler driving operations in all driving ranges.
The main purpose of the present invention is to provide a running control system for an automobile which enables cruising at an optimum car-to-car space by simple and easy driving operations in any driving range (from slow running in a heavy traffic status to fast running).
The aforesaid purpose can be accomplished by a running control system comprising nearby-object detecting component for detecting an object ahead of the automobile and calculating the space between the automobile and the object and the relative velocity of the object, component for detecting the velocity of the automobile, and component for automatically controlling the velocity of the automobile; wherein said running control system has at least two cruising modes such as a slow follow-up mode and a fast follow-up mode and lets said velocity controlling component control the velocity of the automobile to keep a preset constant space between the automobile and an object detected by said nearby object detecting component in the slow follow-up mode or to keep a preset constant space between the automobile and only one of objects detected by said nearby object detecting component that is faster than a preset ground velocity in the fast follow-up mode.
Further the purpose can be accomplished by a running control system which can automatically switch to the slow follow-up mode when the target velocity of the fast-running automobile goes under a preset velocity and cancel the maximum velocity in the slow follow-up mode manually by the driver.
In accordance with the present invention, an automobile running control system having “Fast follow-up” and “Slow follow-up” modes can cruise the automobile at an optimum car-to-car space in all running ranges (from slow cruising in a heavy traffic condition to fast cruising) by controlling the velocity of the automobile so that the current automobile may keep an optimum space from the detected forerunning object which is faster than the preset ground velocity in the “Fast follow-up” mode. When the fast follow-up velocity of the automobile falls under the preset velocity, the system automatically enters the “Slow follow-up” mode, which reduces the driver's burden.
Further, the safety and convenience of the automobile can be improved and assured when the system is equipped with a means which suppresses cruising at a velocity higher than a preset velocity limit when the target velocity goes higher than the preset velocity limit and enables manual cancellation of cruising at a high-limit velocity.
A first embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail below, referring to FIG. 1 through FIG. 9.
As shown in
Below will be explained details of the first embodiment of the present invention, referring to FIG. 4 through FIG. 6.
In Step 603, the nearby object detecting unit 401 checks whether the current automobile is in the “Fast follow-up” mode 204. When the current automobile is not in the “Fast follow-up” mode 204, all objects that are detected are selected as targets in Step 610. When the current automobile is in the “Fast follow-up” mode 204, Step 604 calculates the ground velocity Vp of each of the objects which are detected in Step 604. Step 606 selects objects whose ground velocities are over a preset velocity Vlimit.
In Step 607, the nearby object detecting unit 401 outputs information about a target which is selected in Step 606 or 610 to the running control means 101. Step 606 uses the area A in
Below will be explained the operations of the “Fast follow-up” mode 204 of the first embodiment, referring to FIG. 8. In this mode, the running control system checks the status of respective setting means at preset time intervals (10 msec to 200 msec) and performs processing according to the status. Step 701 checks the status of the system start/stop means 117. When the means 117 is operated to stop, the system enters the function stop mode 201 (in Step 708). Step 702 checks the status of the canceling means 116. When the means 117 is operated to cancel, the system enters the standby mode 202 (in Step 709). Step 703 checks the status of the manual braking means 106. When the means 106 is operated, the system enters the manual braking mode 206 (in Step 710).
Step 704 checks whether there is an automobile in the way of the current automobile from information of targets which are selected and sent from the target selecting means 120. When Step 704 judges that no automobile is in the way of the current automobile, the running control system enters the “Running at a constant velocity” mode 203 (in Step 711). When Step 704 judges that an automobile is in the way of the current automobile, Step 705 calculates an optimum velocity Vs of the current velocity to keep an optimum space between the current automobile and the target from information such as a distance between the current automobile and the target and the relative velocity of the target.
When Step 706 judges that the calculated velocity Vs is less than the preset velocity Vth, the system enters the “Slow follow-up” mode 205 (in Step 712). In this case, Vth is a velocity at which the mode changes from the “Fast follow-up” mode to the “Slow follow-up” mode and it is approximately 40 km/hour to 60 km/hour. When Step 706 judges the calculated velocity Vs is not less than the preset velocity Vth, the system remains in the “Fast follow-up” mode and Step 707 controls the velocity of the automobile to keep an optimum space between the current automobile and the target object.
Below will be explained the operations of the “Slow follow-up” mode 205 of the first embodiment, referring to FIG. 9. In this mode, the running control system checks the status of respective setting means at preset time intervals (10 msec to 200 msec) and performs processing according to the status. Steps 701 through 703 and 708 through 710 in
Step 805 compares the calculated velocity Vs by the preset high-limit velocity Vup (approx. 40 km/hour to 60 km/hour). When the calculated velocity Vs is greater than the preset high-limit velocity Vup, the system enters the “Running at the maximum low velocity” status 220 (in Step 808) to run the automobile at the maximum low velocity Vup.
When the calculated velocity Vs is less than the preset high-limit velocity Vup (in Step 805), Step 806 controls the velocity of the current automobile to keep an optimum space from the forerunning automobile. In this case, the maximum slow velocity Vup is equal to or greater than the preset velocity Vth at which the mode changes from the “Fast follow-up” mode to the “Slow follow-up” mode.
Below will be explained the operations of the embodiment of the present invention in the “Running at the maximum low velocity” status 220, referring to FIG. 10. Steps 701 through 703 and 708 through 710 in
As described above, in accordance with the present invention, an automobile running control system having “Fast follow-up” and “Slow follow-up” modes can cruise the automobile at an optimum car-to-car space in all running ranges (from slow cruising in a heavy traffic condition to fast cruising) by controlling the velocity of the automobile so that the current automobile may keep an optimum space from the detected forerunning object which is faster than the preset ground velocity in the “Fast follow-up” mode. When the fast follow-up velocity of the automobile falls under the preset velocity, the system automatically enters the “Slow follow-up” mode, which reduces the driver's burden.
Further, the safety and convenience of the automobile can be improved and assured when the system is equipped with a means which suppresses cruising at a velocity higher than a preset velocity limit when the target velocity goes higher than the preset velocity limit and enables manual cancellation of cruising at a high-limit velocity.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11-187246 | Jul 1999 | JP | national |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/609,764, filed Jul. 03, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,090 B1.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4947952 | Kajiwara | Aug 1990 | A |
5014200 | Chundrlik et al. | May 1991 | A |
5173859 | Deering | Dec 1992 | A |
5230400 | Kakinami et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5454442 | Labuhn et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485892 | Fujita | Jan 1996 | A |
5638277 | Nagai | Jun 1997 | A |
5731977 | Taniguchi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752214 | Minowa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761629 | Gilling | Jun 1998 | A |
5771481 | Gilling | Jun 1998 | A |
5850176 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5902345 | Minowa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5969969 | Ejiri et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6006848 | Boehringer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009368 | Labuhn et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044321 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6161073 | Tange et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175799 | Tsutsumi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188950 | Tsutsumi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233515 | Engelman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236929 | Sen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6317678 | Linden | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6554090 | Kuroda et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0484995 | May 1992 | EP |
0798150 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0897824 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1-273733 | Nov 1989 | JP |
05116557 | May 1993 | JP |
06336125 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-47862 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-225893 | Aug 1995 | JP |
9-71154 | Mar 1997 | JP |
10-000961 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-000962 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-166898 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10338057 | Dec 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030173128 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09609764 | Jul 2000 | US |
Child | 10388413 | US |