The present invention relates to a device that monitors sound directed to a vehicle cabin, and more particularly, though not exclusively, to an audio system and method that monitors signal-to-noise ratios in a vehicle cabin and reproduces ambient sound within the vehicle cabin to maintain sonic situation awareness.
Individuals using audio systems in vehicles generally do so for music enjoyment and/or for voice communication. The vehicle operator is typically immersed in the audio experience when using such devices. The acoustic signals produced from these devices may contend with background noise from the external vehicle environment (e.g., road, engine, wind and traffic noise), as well as noise from the internal vehicle environment (e.g., heating and ventilation noise) in order to be audible. As the background noise levels change, the operator may need to adjust the volume, in order to listen to their music over the background noise. Alternatively, the level of reproduced audio may be automatically increased, for example, by audio systems that increase the audio level as the vehicle velocity increases (i.e., to compensate for the rise in noise level from road, engine, and aerodynamic noise). One example of such an automatic gain control system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,081,682.
Aspects of the present invention relate to audio systems for a vehicle. The audio system includes at least one ambient microphone, a processor and at least one loudspeaker. The at least one ambient microphone is disposed on the vehicle, and configured to capture ambient sound external to the vehicle and to produce an ambient sound signal. The processor is configured to receive the ambient sound signal and an audio content signal, and to mix the ambient sound signal with the audio content signal to generate a mixed output signal. The at least one loudspeaker is configured to reproduce the mixed output signal in the vehicle cabin.
Aspects of the present invention also relate to methods for increasing auditory situation awareness in a vehicle. The method includes receiving an ambient sound signal from at least one ambient microphone disposed on the vehicle for capturing ambient sound external to the vehicle; receiving an audio content signal; determining a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a vehicle cabin of the vehicle; determining an actual SNR in the vehicle cabin; determining an SNR error between the desired SNR and the actual SNR; mixing the audio content signal with the ambient sound signal to generate a mixed output signal responsive to the SNR error; and reproducing the mixed output signal in the vehicle cabin, to increase the auditory situation awareness to the ambient sound external to the vehicle.
Aspects of the present invention also relate to methods for providing a transient detection alert to a transient acoustic event external to a vehicle. The method includes receiving an ambient sound pressure level of an ambient sound signal from at least one ambient microphone disposed on the vehicle for capturing ambient sound external to the vehicle; and receiving a current cabin signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) estimate and a previous cabin SNR estimate when the ambient sound pressure level is greater than a predetermined threshold. Each of the current cabin SNR estimate and the previous cabin SNR estimate represents a ratio between an internal sound level in a vehicle cabin of the vehicle and a level of the ambient sound signal. The method also includes determining a SNR change between the current cabin SNR estimate and the previous cabin SNR estimate; and issuing the transient detection alert within the vehicle cabin when the SNR change is greater than a predetermined SNR change threshold.
The invention may be understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized, according to common practice, that various features of the drawings may not be drawn to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features may be arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Moreover, in the drawing, common numerical references are used to represent like features. Included in the drawing are the following figures:
As the sound level of audio reproduced in the vehicle cabin increases, the vehicle operator may become sonically disassociated with his/her ambient environment, thereby increasing the danger of accidents from collisions with oncoming vehicles. A need therefore exists for improving the sound delivery experience of vehicle audio systems and enhancing situation awareness of the vehicle operator.
Music reproduction levels in vehicles and ambient sound levels are typically antagonistic. For example, vehicle operators typically play vehicle audio devices louder to hear over the traffic and general urban noise. The same applies to voice communication.
Rising population densities have also increased the sound levels on roads. According to a recent study, 40% of the European community is continuously exposed to transportation noise of 55 dBA, and 20% are exposed to greater than 65 dBA of transportation noise. The level of 65 dBA is considered by the World Health Organization to be intrusive or annoying, and as mentioned above, can lead to users of personal audio devices increasing the reproduction level of audio devices (and devices for voice communication) to compensate for ambient noise.
Automotive vehicle operators are often auditorially removed from their external ambient environment external to the vehicle. For example, high sound isolation from the external environment may be provided by cabin structural insulation, close-fitting window seals and thick or double-paned glass. External acoustic signals (i.e., ambient sound cues), such as oncoming emergency (and non-emergency) vehicle warning sounds; vocal messages from pedestrians; and sounds generated by the operator's own vehicle may often not be heard by the vehicle operator.
To summarize, the reduced “situation awareness” of the vehicle operator may be a consequence of multiple factors. One factor includes acoustic isolation of the vehicle cabin (e.g., from the vehicle windows and structural insulation). Another factor includes auditory masking of the ambient sound cues, so that the ambient sound cues may not be heard by the vehicle operator. The auditory masking may include energetic masking due to engine and road noise; broad spectrum masking due to external wind noise as well as heating and ventilation noise; and, especially, loud music reproduction levels or speech audio reproduction levels in the vehicle cabin. The masking effect may be further compounded with telephone communication, where the vehicles operator's attention may be further distracted by the conversation. Telephone communication, thus, may introduce an additional cognitive load that may further reduce the vehicle operator's situation awareness of the vehicle surroundings.
The reduction of the situation awareness of the vehicle operator may lead to danger. For example, a personal safety of the vehicle operator may be reduced. In addition, personal safety of other vehicle operators and pedestrians in the vicinity of the vehicle may also be threatened.
One definition of situation awareness includes, “the perception of elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future.” While some definitions are specific to the environment from which they were adapted, the above definition may be applicable across multiple task domains from visual to auditory modalities.
One focus of the present invention is to enhance (i.e., increase) the auditory situation awareness of a vehicle operator and, thereby, improve the personal safety of the vehicle operator, passengers, and other motorists and pedestrians.
Exemplary methods and systems of the present invention are herein disclosed which may address the problem of reduced auditory situation awareness of vehicle operators. In an exemplary method, ambient external sound may be actively reproduced in the vehicle cabin to maintain an approximately constant sound level ratio between internal cabin audio and an external ambient signal level. The external ambient sound may be detected using one or more microphones mounted on, or transducing sound through, the vehicle exterior.
An exemplary system of the present invention may be configured to allow transient ambient sound cues to pass through into the vehicle cabin, providing detectable spatial localization cues for the vehicle operator. Personal safety of the vehicle operator and his/her passengers may therefore be enhanced, which may also increase the safety of other vehicles (such as oncoming emergency vehicles and, other motorists) and pedestrians. The safety benefit may come not only from the enhanced auditory situation awareness, but via reduced driver workload. For example, the system may reduce the burden on the driver to constantly visually scan the environment for emergency vehicles or other dangers that may also recognize acoustical signatures (that may ordinarily be inaudible inside the vehicle cabin).
Referring to
Processor 114 may be coupled to one or more of user interface 106, indicator 116, loudspeakers 112, 120, memory 128, internal cabin microphone 118 and ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122. Processor 114 may be configured to control acquisition of ambient sound signals from ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 and (optionally) a cabin sound signal from internal cabin microphone 118. Processor 114 may be configured analyze ambient and/or cabin sound signals, and to present information by system 100 to vehicle operator 124 (such as via loudspeakers 112, 120 and/or indicator 116) responsive to the analysis. Processor 114 may be configured to control storage of one or more of audio content (AC) signal 107, the ambient sound signals, the cabin sound signal, the analyzed ambient sound signals and the analyzed cabin sound signal. Processor 114 may include, for example, a logic circuit, a digital signal processor or a microprocessor.
In operation, processor 114 may be configured to receive AC signal 107 and reproduce AC signal 107 through loudspeakers 112, 120 into vehicle cabin 126. Processor 114 may also be configured to receive ambient sound signals from respective ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122. Processor 114 may also be configured to receive a cabin sound signal from internal cabin microphone 118.
Based on an analysis of the ambient sound signals (and, optionally, the cabin sound signal), processor 114 may mix the ambient sound signal from at least one of ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 with AC signal 107. Processor 114 may also consider operation of other factors that may contribute to sound pressure levels within vehicle cabin 126, described further below with respect to
AC signal 107 may include any audio signal provided to (and/or generated by) processor 114 that may be reproduced through loudspeakers 112, 120. AC signal 107 may correspond to (without being limited to) at least one of the following exemplary signals: a music or voice audio signal from a music audio source (for example, a radio, a portable media player, a computing device); voice audio (for example, from a telephone, a radio device or an occupant of vehicle 102); or an audio warning signal automatically generated by vehicle 102 (for example, in response to a backup proximity sensor, an unbelted passenger restraint, an engine malfunction condition, or other audio alert signals). AC signal 107 may be manually selected by vehicle operator 124 (for example, with user interface 106), or may be automatically generated by vehicle 102 (for example, by processor 114).
Although in
User interface 106 may include any suitable user interface capable of providing parameters for one or more of processor 114, indicator 116, loudspeakers 112, 120, memory 128, internal cabin microphone 118 and ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122. User interface 106 may include, for example, one or more buttons, a pointing device, a keyboard and/or a display device.
Processor 114 may also issue alerts to vehicle operator 124, for example, via indicator 116. Indicator 116 may provide alerts via a visual indication, an auditory indication (such as a tonal alert) and/or a haptic indication. Indicator 116 may include any suitable indicator such as (without being limited to): a display (such as a heads-up display), a loudspeaker or a haptic transducer (for example, mounted in the vehicle's steering wheel or operator seat). According to an exemplary embodiment, a magnitude of the haptic transducer's amplitude, a frequency of its vibration (i.e., higher frequency output connotes higher criticality/urgency) and/or a pulsing of its vibration may be modulated by a degree of criticality/urgency. For example, a higher frequency output may indicate a higher criticality. Similarly, a frequency or a pulsing of a tonal alert may change based on a degree of criticality/urgency. Further, an amplitude, pulsing and/or a frequency of displaying an alert may change in accordance with a degree of criticality/urgency.
In an exemplary embodiment, processor 114 may also use ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 and/or internal cabin microphone 118 and loudspeakers 112, 120 to cancel a background noise component (such as road noise) in vehicle cabin 126. For example, the noise cancellation may be centered at the position of vehicle operator 124.
Memory 128 may store at least one of raw microphone signals (ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 and/or internal cabin microphone 118), analyzed information (from processor 114) or information regarding AC signal 107. Memory 128 may include, for example, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, flash memory or a hard drive.
Ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 may be positioned on vehicle 102 (for example, on an exterior of vehicle 102 or any other suitable location) such that ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 may transduce sound that is external to vehicle 102. Although four ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 are illustrated in
According to an exemplary embodiment, processor 114 may estimate a sound pressure level (SPL) of vehicle cabin 126 (referred to herein as the cabin SPL) by analyzing a signal level and signal gain reproduced with at least one of loudspeakers 112, 120, and the sensitivity of respective loudspeakers 112, 120. In another exemplary embodiment, processor 114 may determine the cabin SPL via internal cabin microphone 118. Use of internal cabin microphone 118 may allow consideration of other sound sources in vehicle cabin 126 (i.e., other than sound sources contributed by loudspeakers 112, 120), such as an air conditioning system, and sound from other passengers in vehicle 102.
System 100 may be coupled to a remote location (not shown), for example, by wireless communication. Information collected by system 100 (such as information stored in memory 128) may be provided to the remote location (such as for further analysis).
Referring to
At step 202, a desired cabin signal to noise ratio (SNR) may be determined, for example by processor 114 (
The desired SNR may be selected based on human factors standards. For example, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) includes guidelines ISO 7731, which recommends using 13 dB in ⅓ octave bands or 15 dB broadband, rather than have a target SNR as a variable. The SNRs suggested in ISO 7731 are typically for danger signals and may be too high for most vehicle cabin 126 (
At step 204, an actual cabin signal to noise ratio (SNR) 204 may be determined, for example, by processor 114 (
At step 206, a SNR error (or SNR mismatch) 206 may be calculated, for example, by processor 114 (
At step 208 (which may be performed optionally, or in combination with step 210), an Audio Content (AC) gain may be updated, for example, by processor 114 (
At step 210 (which may be performed optionally, or in combination with step 208), at least one Ambient Signal (AS) gain may be updated, for example, by processor 114 (
The AS gain may include a time-varying gain. In an exemplary embodiment the AS gain includes a frequency dependent filter. In another exemplary embodiment, the AS gain includes a single time-varying gain coefficient (there may be multiple AS gain coefficients for each of the ambient sound signals).
At step 212, the audio content signal 107 (
At step 214, the mixed signal (step 212) may be reproduced, for example, by at least one of loudspeaker 112 or loudspeaker 120. Step 214 may proceed to step 202 and steps 202-214 may be repeated.
In an exemplary embodiment, separate left/right AC gain signals may be used, so that the left channel of AC signal 107 (
In an exemplary embodiment, the spatial ordering of the ambient sound signals (from ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 as shown in
According to another embodiment, ambient sound signals (from ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the cabin SNR 322 may be determined as a level ratio (e.g. in dB) between a first “signal” level (cabin audio content level 320) and a second “noise” level (cabin noise level 321). The first “signal” level (cabin audio content 320) corresponds to the sound pressure level or electronic signal level of the audio content signal 318 (e.g., music, speech or an alert audio signal) fed to at least one of loudspeakers 112, 120 (
In one exemplary embodiment, the second “noise” level (cabin noise level 321) may correspond to the sound pressure level (measured in vehicle cabin 126, such as by internal cabin microphone 118). In another exemplary embodiment, cabin noise level 321 may correspond to an electronic signal level of the sum of the ambient sound signal 302 from the at least one of ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 (
In another exemplary embodiment, cabin noise level 321 may correspond to the sound pressure level measured in the vehicle cabin (generated by a sum from among ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 (
The passive sound leakage component can be determined by measuring the ambient sound pressure level using at least one of ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 (
The sound pressure level may be determined by first filtering the ambient sound microphone signal(s) 302 with a frequency dependent filter (e.g., corresponding to the A, B or C weighting curve). Alternatively, the Phon frequency weighting curves may be used, where a particular Phon curve may be selected depending on the un-weighted SPL estimate for each ambient microphone 104, 108, 110, 122 (
The vehicle attenuation function (i.e., System Transmission Loss (STL)) may be determined using standard acoustic attenuation tests of insertion loss, and depending on the status of the vehicle's total insertion loss (i.e., due to window design, gasketing, structural insulation, etc.), may be further modified. For instance, the degree to which each window is closed may be determined (e.g. as a percentage, where 100% corresponds to the fully closed position for a given window, and 0% corresponds to the fully open position). From this “degree of closure” measure for each window, the vehicle attenuation could be modified, for example, using either a predetermined formula or a look-up (hash) table.
The concept of a “Constant-SNR” system is a slight misnomer, because the system 100 (
Cabin noise level 321 (Ln) may be determined in a number of ways. In an exemplary embodiment, cabin noise level 321 may be calculated according to the following formula as:
where LA represents the ambient sound pressure level (measured at the location of at least one of ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 (
The cabin audio content level 320 (Ls) may be calculated in a similar manner as:
Ls=Ls_in*Gs
where Ls_in is the sound pressure level that would be generated in vehicle cabin 126 (
In an exemplary embodiment, cabin noise level 321 and cabin audio content level 320 may be calculated via frequency weighting and temporal smoothing. For example, by using A-weighting or Phon-weighting, and a leaky-integrator with a time constant of approx. 50-200 ms.
The cabin SNR 322 may therefore be calculated as a log-ratio between the signal level (cabin audio content level 320) and the noise level (cabin noise level 321) as:
Similarly, if the cabin audio content level 320 and cabin noise level 321 is expressed in dB, then the SNR may be calculated as a difference between these levels (i.e. SNR=Ls−Ln).
A level of audio content signal 318 and/or cabin SNR 322 may be used to determine a preferred listening level 314 by vehicle operator 124 (
The desired SNR 316 may be determined using a number of methods (or combinations thereof), for example, by manual user input 312 (e.g., vehicle operator 124 (
Desired SNR 316 may be determined automatically from ambient sound analysis 304 of the ambient sound field. For example, when a predetermined sound is detected such as a siren or car horn, the desired SNR 316 may be decreased to enable the vehicle operator 124 (
Desired SNR 316 may be determined by analysis of vehicle window position status 310. For example, if the a particular window is at a 50% open location, the desired SNR 316 may be reduced so that lower SPL of external sound signal 302 is reproduced in the vehicle cabin 126 (
Desired SNR 316 may be determined by consideration of telephone activation status 306 (i.e., whether a telephone is in use). For example, if a telephone is in use, the desired SNR 316 may be reduced so that audio content signal 318 is reduced.
Desired SNR 316 may be determined by analysis of voice activity detection (VAD) unit 311 within vehicle 102 (
Desired SNR 316 may be determined by analysis of the vehicle velocity 308 and/or vehicle translational direction, fore-aft. For example, the desired SNR 316 may be different for high versus low speeds. If the velocity is determined to be a backward direction (i.e., the vehicle 102 (
Desired SNR 316 may be determined by vehicle sound generation analysis 304. For example, operation of vehicle sound generating devices, such as windshield wipers, a horn, or heating and ventilation systems may increase the cabin noise level 321 and reduce the audibility of audio content signal 318.
Furthermore, it may be desirable to disable the in-cabin ambient sound level calculation (i.e., cabin noise level 321) while the user is talking (i.e. so the vehicle operator's voice level is not factored into the level estimate).
The mismatch between the desired SNR 316 and actual cabin SNR 322 may be used to update 324 the ambient microphone and audio signal gains (i.e. ambient microphone gain 328 and audio gain 326) so as to iteratively force the SNR error (or mismatch) to zero. The audio gain 326 may, optionally, be applied to audio content signal 318 with gain unit 330 and the ambient microphone gain 328 may, optionally, be applied to ambient sound signal 302 with gain unit 332, with the resulting two signals being mixed by summing unit 334, forming mixed output signal 336. If the audio content signal 318 is not modified, then the unmodified signal 318 is summed with the output of ambient sound signal gain unit 332. The resulting mixed output signal 336 is then fed to at least one cabin loudspeaker 112, 120 (
Various operating modes may be used to control the rate of change of the ambient microphone gain 328 and audio gain 326 (i.e., update gains 324), depending on the degree of signal distortion tolerated or the operator's circumstances. For instance, in a particular “high quality” mode of operation, it may be desirable to only adjust the ambient gain 328, so as to eliminate distortion artifacts from modulating the audio signal level (i.e., to minimize compressive “pumping” artifacts). Alternately, for a “critical mission” scenario, it may be desirable to maintain a high SNR, so that incoming audio messages may be continuously heard.
Depending upon detection of a transient ambient event in cabin SNR, an indication may be provided to vehicle operator 124 (
Referring to
At step 402, an ambient sound pressure level may be received, for example, the sound pressure level may be measured with one or a combination of ambient microphones 104, 108, 110, 122 (
At step 404, it is determined whether the received ambient sound pressure level (step 402) is greater than an SPL_threshold value 406, for example, by processor 114 (
If it is determined, at step 404, that the received ambient sound pressure level is less than or equal to SPL_threshold value 406, then step 404 proceeds to step 402 and steps 402 and 404 are repeated.
If it is determined, at step 404, that the received ambient sound pressure level is greater than SPL_threshold value 406, then step 404 proceeds to step 408.
At step 408, a new (i.e., current) cabin SNR estimate is received, for example, as described above with respect to
At step 412, a change in the cabin SNR estimate 412, Delta_SNR may be calculated, for example, by processor 114 (
At step 414, it is determined whether the calculated change in the cabin SNR estimate (Delta_SNR) (step 412) is greater than Delta_SNR_threshold value 416, for example, by processor 114 (
If it is determined, at step 414, that the change in the cabin SNR estimate (Delta_SNR) is less than or equal to Delta_SNR_threshold value 416, then step 414 proceeds to step 402 and steps 402-414 are repeated.
If it is determined, at step 414, that the change in the cabin SNR estimate (Delta_SNR) is greater than Delta_SNR_threshold value 416, then step 414 proceeds to step 418.
At step 418, a transient detection alert is issued, for example, via indicator 116 (
A haptic alert to vehicle operator 124 (
A visual alert to vehicle operator 124 (
Although the invention has been described in terms of systems and methods for enhancing situation awareness in a vehicle, it is contemplated that one or more steps and/or components may be implemented in software for use with microprocessors/general purpose computers (not shown). In this embodiment, one or more of the functions of the various components and/or steps described above may be implemented in software that controls a computer. The software may be embodied in non-transitory tangible computer readable media (such as, by way of non-limiting example, a magnetic disk, optical disk, flash memory, hard drive, etc.) for execution by the computer.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the invention.
This application claims priority to PCT International Application No. PCT/US2012/021074 filed Jan. 12, 2012, entitled “AUTOMOTIVE CONSTANT SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED SITUATION AWARENESS” and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/432,014 entitled “AUTOMOTIVE CONSTANT SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED SITUATION AWARENESS” filed on Jan. 12, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/021074 | 1/12/2012 | WO | 00 | 10/30/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/097148 | 7/19/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5081682 | Kato et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
6360187 | Hermann | Mar 2002 | B1 |
20030076968 | Rast | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20060253282 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080137873 | Goldstein | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090010442 | Usher | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010444 | Goldstein | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016542 | Goldstein | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090146799 | Goldstein | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100033313 | Keady | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20130064392 | Sugiyama | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/021074, dated Jul. 13, 2012. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/021074, dated Jul. 13, 2012. |
Wickens, “Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement”, Human Factors, vol. 50, No. 3, Jun. 2008, pp. 397-403. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150036832 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61432014 | Jan 2011 | US |