1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a hinged vehicle door which may be selectively immobilized in a number of locations ranging from fully open to fully closed.
2. Related Art
Hinged doors are frequently used by vehicle occupants to assist during ingress and egress of the vehicle. In essence, the vehicle door is utilized as a steady rest to enable the vehicle occupant to move himself or herself either into or out of a vehicular space, such as a seat. The present inventors have determined that usage of the door in this manner would be enhanced by the ability to immobilize the door in mid-swing. As shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,681,444, it is known to provide an apparatus which allows the door to be checked in any one of a number of positions, from fully opened to fully closed. However, the system of the '444 patent does not immobilize the door; rather, the system of the '444 patent merely increases the amount of force needed to move the door, while clearly providing that this force may be overridden and the door closed against the action of the door check. This renders the system of the '444 patent inapposite to solution of the present problem, because a door which swings free after the application of an indeterminate amount of force could inhibit the ingress/egress process by starting to swing at an inopportune time.
It would be desirable to provide an automotive door with a repositionable immobilizer permitting the door to be placed in any position and rotationally locked against further movement, so as to resist a reasonable and predictable level of force imposed by a motorist using the door to assist in entering or leaving a vehicle.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a vehicle having a swinging door includes a door mechanism with a fixed hinge half attached to a structure such as an A-pillar or hinge pillar. The fixed hinge half has a lower support leg and an upper support leg. A moveable hinge half is secured between the upper and lower support legs. The moveable hinge half has a center section which is attached to an inner panel of the door. A rotary, repositionable immobilizer device includes a hydraulic working chamber having a vane which rotates within the working chamber synchronously with rotation of the vehicle door. The vane is locked in place selectively by means of a valving mechanism attached to the chamber such that the position of the vane establishes two smaller working chambers which vary in size, depending upon the vane's position. A flow of hydraulic fluid between these two smaller working chambers is controlled by a valve operatively connected with a controller.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a switch attached to a vehicle, either on an interior part such as a door trim panel, or associated with an exterior locking device such as a lock cylinder, or at both locations, is attached to a controller which locks the immobilizer device when the switch is activated. Alternatively, a remote controller embodied in a key fob may be used to trigger immobilization of a door according to an aspect of the present invention.
It is an advantage of a system according to the present invention that a vehicle door may be selectively immobilized at the discretion of the vehicle's driver merely by triggering a switch mounted to the door trim panel, or upon a key fob, or upon an outside surface or mechanism of the vehicle, such as a lock cylinder.
It is another advantage of a system according to the present invention that a vehicle door may be immobilized without the need for extensive additional hardware, and without the need for repackaging the door hinge assemblies.
Other advantages, as well as features of the present invention, will become apparent to the reader of this specification.
As shown in
Moving now to
A repositionable immobilizer according to an aspect of the present invention further includes moveable hinge half 34, having a center section 36, which is bored or cored for a hinge pin, 40. Hinge pin 40 rotates with center section 36 as door 14 is opened or closed. Moveable hinge half 34 is attached to door inner panel 42 by means of cap screws 38, it being understood that alternatively, moveable hinge half 34 may be attached to door inner panel 42 by means of welding, adhesives, and other types of fastening methods known to those skilled in the art and suggested by this disclosure.
The present door swing immobilizer utilizes hydraulic operating principles. A working chamber, 76, which is filled with hydraulic fluid, has a vane, 80, mounted for rotation therein. Vane 80 is attached to hinge pin 40, and working chamber 76 is mounted upon upper portion 30 of fixed hinge half 18. As door 14 is caused to rotate by an occupant of vehicle 10, vane 80 rotates within working chamber 76. In effect, vane 80 defines two variable sub-volumes, or smaller working chambers, within working chamber 76. Ports 84 connect each of the two variable volumes defined by vane 80 to a control valve, 88, which is in turn connected with controller 102. When valve 88 is open, door 14 and vane 80 are free to rotate because hydraulic fluid may easily move from one of the sub-chambers defined by vane 80 to the other of the sub-chambers. However, when valve 88 is closed, vane 80 is hydrostatically locked in whatever rotational position it was placed by the vehicle's occupant before switch 98 was closed, because hydraulic fluid will be confined within working chamber 76 on both sides of vane 80.
Closure of switch 98 immobilizes vane 80, and therefore, door 14. An advantage of the device of
The second door function enabled by position sensor 89 relates to the rate of closing or opening of door 14. If, for example, a motorist opens the door in the face of a vigorous wind, either door 14 may be damaged, or, at the very least, door 14 may be difficult for the motorist to control. However, the signal from position sensor 89 enables controller 102 to determine the swinging speed of door 14, so that if door 14 begins to move at too great a rotational speed, valve 88 may be closed partially to damp the door's motion by hydrostatically inhibiting rotation of vane 80 and door 14.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly the scope of legal protection afforded this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional application having Ser. No. 60/944,339 filed on Jun. 15, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1735024 | Toncray | Nov 1929 | A |
2117060 | Gouse | May 1938 | A |
2176641 | Schonitzer | Oct 1939 | A |
3650557 | Dudley | Mar 1972 | A |
3664514 | Drake | May 1972 | A |
3792777 | Drake | Feb 1974 | A |
3965531 | Fox et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4332056 | Griffin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4458446 | Mochida et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4658468 | Tillmann et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4756051 | Shy | Jul 1988 | A |
4788743 | Okumura | Dec 1988 | A |
4815163 | Simmons | Mar 1989 | A |
5074010 | Gignac et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5090521 | Miura | Feb 1992 | A |
5346272 | Priest et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5426819 | Rohn | Jun 1995 | A |
5560079 | Jeynes | Oct 1996 | A |
5829097 | Toledo | Nov 1998 | A |
6065185 | Breed et al. | May 2000 | A |
6135536 | Ciavaglia | Oct 2000 | A |
6349448 | Breed et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353968 | Shyu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370732 | Yezersky | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382706 | Yuge et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6348794 | Ng et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446305 | Kneeland | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476126 | Yezersky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513193 | Yezersky et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532627 | Audisio | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6618899 | Ginzel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6681444 | Breed et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6711778 | Sparkman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6753777 | Li | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6880204 | Ochiai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6928694 | Breed et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928695 | Ochiai | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947818 | Li | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6976289 | Luca | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993808 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007341 | Wang | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7147266 | Huntsman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175227 | Menard | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7828127 | Jeffries | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20040200149 | Dickmann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050085972 | Martinez | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050177975 | Wang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177976 | Alexander | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177977 | Hattori et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177978 | Satoh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177980 | Herper | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183338 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230195 | Jones et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242618 | Menard | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060238285 | Dimig et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254142 | Das et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1126111 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1566507 | Jan 2005 | EP |
2001 73615 | Mar 2001 | JP |
WO 0036255 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080309118 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60944339 | Jun 2007 | US |