This invention relates to an auxiliary hydraulic drive system for powering a hydrostatic power take off (“PTO”) and/or for directly powering a hydraulically driven auxiliary implement.
Many agricultural and industrial prime movers are equipped with auxiliary implement drive systems which are powered by mechanically driven power take-offs or directly connected hydraulic power. A non-limiting list of typical implements includes rotary and flail mowers, snow blowers, rotary tillers, landscape preparators, trenchers, etc. Typically implements have a required horsepower rating based on power take off speeds of either 540 or 1000 rpm. Optimal operation of these implement systems requires a sufficient amount of horsepower at the rated speed being transmitted to the implement combined with a suitable ground speed and resulting feed rate. The ground speed and resulting feed rate to the implement depend on transmission and gear/speed selection. With the current conventional drive systems, an ideal or optimal application would have the prime mover (for example a tractor, back-hoe, bulldozer, or skid/steer loader) operated at a constant engine speed so as to optimize the implement input horsepower. In very few circumstances is this ideal possible.
In most combinations, the horsepower supplied to the implement is directly related to the prime mover's engine speed. Typical transmissions and gears are in fixed proportions. Therefore when the engine speed slows, so does the supplied horsepower and speed of the implement. A sufficiently slow ground speed can result in a reduction in supplied horsepower below the implement's rating, resulting in a drop in the implement's efficiency.
Prime movers with mechanical or conventional hydrostatic power take off or hydrostatic/hydraulic drive system have some functional disadvantages:
One common disadvantage of conventional power take-offs, either mechanical or hydraulic, is that the auxiliary implement speed and relating drive horsepower are directly proportional to the prime mover engine speed. As an example, when the vehicle/engine speed is slowed for improved and safe maneuverability, the auxiliary implement loses operating efficiency and inertia, resulting in poorer performance and overloading the prime mover engine. Currently this must be overcome by methods such as disengaging the ground drive and speeding up the engine, selecting a low ground speed (gear), or reducing the load on the implement. For a mower or flail, a reduced load is typically done by raising the implement's height, resulting in less output and/or requiring multiple applications of the implement.
Another typical disadvantage of conventional power take-offs is that if a reduction in feed rate to the implement is required due to heavier than normal conditions, the operator must make a ground speed reduction via the vehicle transmission (gear change) due to the fact a simple ground speed reduction via engine speed results in a proportional drop off in power to the implement thus potentially overloading the prime mover engine.
Certain embodiments of the present invention address these and other needs.
One preferred embodiment of the present invention provides an auxiliary hydraulic drive system including a hydraulic pump operable to provide hydraulic flow for an implement having an optimum flow level. A flow control valve is in communication with the hydraulic flow, wherein the flow control valve operates to divert excess flow above the optimum flow level away from the implement. Preferably the flow control valve reduces the amount of diverted flow as the hydraulic flow from the hydraulic pump is reduced.
An alternate preferred embodiment provides an auxiliary hydraulic drive system having a total hydraulic flow. The system includes a primary hydraulic pump operable to provide hydraulic flow for an implement, and a flow control valve in communication with the hydraulic flow. The flow control valve operates to allow an optimum flow rate and diverts the excess flow amount when the total hydraulic flow exceeds the optimum flow rate. A secondary hydraulic pump is selectively operable to provide additional hydraulic flow. A control system is operable to engage the secondary pump when the total hydraulic flow drops below a minimum flow level; and the control system operates to disengage the secondary pump when the total hydraulic flow exceeds a maximum flow level.
In a still further embodiment, the invention provides a control unit for a hydraulic system. The control unit includes a sensor to measure total hydraulic fluid flow in the system, and a controller coupled to the sensor. The controller is operable to initiate additional fluid flow in the system if the total fluid flow drops below a minimum, and is operable to reduce the fluid flow in the system if the total fluid flow exceeds a maximum.
Objects, features and advantages of the present invention shall become apparent from the detailed drawings and descriptions provided herein.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations, modifications, and further applications of the principles of the invention being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
In certain embodiments, the present invention provides a system and method for transmitting power from an engine to an auxiliary implement, preferably a hydraulically driven implement. At the basic level, such a system typically includes or is connected to a prime mover with an engine, which is coupled via a transmission to a hydraulic pump. The hydraulic pump draws hydraulic fluid from a reservoir and pumps it under pressure to the implement to provide power to the implement. The implement may be directly connected to the hydraulic circuit or connected to a PTO mechanism. After the hydraulic fluid powers the implement, it is returned to the reservoir for re-use. In preferred embodiments, the present invention provides a system and method for providing optimum fluid flow and thus substantially consistent horsepower to the implement while the engine speed varies.
Examples of prime movers include bulldozers, back-hoes, tractors, skid-steer loaders, or other, typically movable, machinery. The prime mover typically includes an engine which varies in engine speed in relation to the rate of use, speed or feed rate of the prime mover. The engine may include a geared transmission. Typically, as the engine load increases, the engine speed decreases until the engine stops, the load is reduced or the engine is shifted to a different available gear. The present invention provides a system for powering an implement which takes power from the engine and allows the engine to vary in speed without a necessarily corresponding variance in implement power.
There are several advantages to allowing the ability to reduce the engine speed of the prime mover without a directly proportional reduction in implement speed and related performance. Some of these advantages are lowering the feed rate to the implement, improved vehicle maneuverability, improved fuel efficiency, noise and engine wear reduction, and improved engine cooling. These advantages may accrue with various transmission types from the engine to ground drive, i.e. mechanical, torque converter, or infinitely variable hydrostatic, and may also accrue whether with various implement drive systems, i.e. hydrostatic PTO or a conventional hydrostatic/hydraulic direct connection. The present invention is not dependent on the transmission type.
The present invention eliminates certain disadvantages while supplying a larger percentage of the available/reserve engine horsepower to the implement at lower engine speeds. This is done by providing relatively constant hydraulic flow (i.e., supplied horsepower) at an optimum level, therefore providing a substantially constant implement speed over a wider engine speed range. This allows the implement to maintain performance when the engine speed is reduced.
In alternate embodiments, the present invention may supply hydraulic power via flow and pressure to a hydrostatic power take off (“PTO”) coupling which is mechanically coupled to an implement, or the invention may directly supply hydraulic power to a hydraulically powered implement via an internal or external hydraulic conduit. The methods of connection include, for example, quick-disconnects, manual on/off valves, and/or direct connections. References to PTO or direct connection embodiments herein are for convenience, and are intended to refer to any connection method.
In one preferred embodiment, illustrated schematically in
In the embodiment illustrated in
In an alternate preferred embodiment, illustrated schematically in
In the preferred embodiment illustrated in
As the engine speed is reduced, the output from the primary pump 20 is reduced until the engine 15 and primary pump 20 reach a pre-set minimum threshold. The electronic control module (ECM) 45 and an engine speed sensor 47 determine when the minimum threshold is reached and initiate the second pump 25. When initiated, output from the second pump 25 is added to the output from the primary pump to increase the system's total flow. The secondary pump typically has an hydraulic output less than the primary pump's output, but preferably has sufficient capacity, at the engine's reduced speed, to raise the total hydraulic flow to a value greater than the PTO's optimal hydraulic flow. When the total hydraulic flow exceeds the PTO's optimal needs, the flow control 40 again diverts any excess flow and heat to the reservoir.
If the engine speed continues to decline, both pumps jointly operate to supply fluid to the PTO. Flow control 40 allocates the fluid flow, if possible, to maintain an optimal flow to the implement. If the total system flow drops below the PTO's optimal needs, the hydraulic flow and horsepower to the PTO will eventually decrease.
If the engine speed increases, the primary and secondary pumps jointly increase their output, with excess diverted, until the ECM 45 and sensor 47 determine that the primary pump's output alone is sufficient for the PTO's needs. The secondary pump 25 is then returned to a disengaged or stand-by state. In certain embodiments, the secondary pump 25 runs at a minimal level while not engaged, and the dump valve 60 diverts any flow to an alternate use or the reservoir.
In preferred embodiments, the flow control valve 40 is adjustable so that various selectable flow rates can be delivered from the system to the hydraulically driven attachments. Various flow rates may be desired based on the specific attachment in use.
In one preferred embodiment, the ECM 45 and sensor 47 are calibrated to the engine 15 and pumps 20 and 25, so that the individual pump and total system hydraulic fluid flow can be calculated from a known engine speed. In alternate preferred embodiments, a fluid flow sensor or sensors directly measure the fluid flow from each pump and/or the total fluid flow in the system.
In further preferred embodiments, two or more output pumps and controls are used in the system and the electronic control module is triggered by various other means such as, but not limited to, flow, torque or pressure sensors. In one embodiment, multiple pumps are used and each pump preferably has a set output rate. The individual pumps are initiated or disengaged when the corresponding marginal output is needed or no longer needed, as appropriate. Multiple pumps with smaller output rates can be used to minimize the excess system flow in a given configuration.
In a still further preferred embodiment, variable output pumps are used for the primary and/or secondary pumps. With variable output pumps, the ECM senses the engine speed or pump flow and the PTO requirements and then dynamically raises or lowers each pump's output to match the PTO's need, eliminating the need for a separate flow control valve and the diversion of excess fluid to the reservoir.
System 10 is illustrated with more detail in
As a second loop, secondary pump 25 feeds a three point flow control valve 60 which controls fluid flow to control valve 40 and to a second accessory valve 65, such as a three point hitch height adjuster. In this embodiment, control valve 60 has a priority flow to the second accessory, wherein the priority flow is preferably substantially less than the secondary pump's output. After use in the second accessory, hydraulic fluid returns to reservoir 27.
Control valve 40 may be adjusted by control 43 to provide different flow rates for accessories as desired, such as 8, 13, 18, 22, 26 and 30 gal/min. When alternate flow rates are selected, the primary and secondary pump parameters can be varied as desired to maintain optimum performance for system 10.
A flow chart of the control logic in system 10 is illustrated in
If the system drops below T1, step 325 initiates second pump P2 with flow F2. The total fluid flow F1+F2 is sent to the tool, with any excess diverted, step 330. The system continues to be monitored, step 335, to determine if the total flow rises to exceed a ceiling threshold T2. So long as the system remains below T2, the system achieves a steady state. If threshold T2 is exceeded, the system disengages second pump P2 and returns to only pump P1 supplying flow F1 to the tool.
The set-up of
When the engine 15 encounters a load which detracts from its optimal speed, the flow from primary pump 20 is reduced in proportion to the engine's decrease in speed and the excess flow being diverted by control valve 40 is re-directed to accessory 50 to maintain the flow as close as possible (within variances) to an optimal 26 gal/min flow. When an engine sensor 47 detects that the engine speed has slowed to a preset threshold, such as 1750 rpm, where it is determined that the total system flow from only primary pump 20 is insufficient, an electronic controller 45 initiates secondary pump 25. (A model for a suitable secondary pump is supplied by Sauer-Danfoss.) Secondary pump 25 provides a flow supply which is combined with the flow supplied from primary pump 20 to raise the total system flow.
The total flow supply from primary pump 20 plus secondary pump 25 is preferably greater than needed for accessory 50, with the excess 42 over the accessory requirements diverted by valve 40 as fluid and heat. For example, as illustrated by the flow data in
A diagram of a Coneqtec C85 valve assembly 240 is shown in
In an alternate preferred embodiment, secondary pump 25 and/or primary pump 20 are continuously variable output pumps. With a continuously variable pump(s), the pump output is controlled to maintain a constant output to the accessory while engine speed varies. In alternate embodiments, multiple pumps are used in the control logic with each pump engaged or disengaged as the system fluid flow falls below or exceeds certain thresholds.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
This application claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/431,927 filed Dec. 9, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3940930 | Rosander | Mar 1976 | A |
3952510 | Peterson | Apr 1976 | A |
4121501 | Finley | Oct 1978 | A |
4141280 | Lorimor | Feb 1979 | A |
4354420 | Bianchetta | Oct 1982 | A |
4507057 | Igarashi et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4558629 | Unger et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4768339 | Aoyagi et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779416 | Chatterjea et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5537819 | Kobayashi | Jul 1996 | A |
5680760 | Lunzman | Oct 1997 | A |
6173572 | Cobo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6293099 | Kamiya | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293765 | Peterson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6305162 | Cobo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6360538 | McGowan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6430850 | VanDerZyl et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6789387 | Brinkman | Sep 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040118115 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60431927 | Dec 2002 | US |