1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to mechanical igniters, and more particularly to axially compact and low-volume mechanical igniters for thermal batteries and the like.
2. Prior Art
Thermal batteries represent a class of reserve batteries that operate at high temperature. Unlike liquid reserve batteries, in thermal batteries the electrolyte is already in the cells and therefore does not require a distribution mechanism such as spinning. The electrolyte is dry, solid and non-conductive, thereby leaving the battery in a non-operational and inert condition. These batteries incorporate pyrotechnic heat sources to melt the electrolyte just prior to use in order to make them electrically conductive and thereby makinu the battery active. The most common internal pyrotechnic is a blend of Fe and KClO4. Thermal batteries utilize a molten salt to serve as the electrolyte upon activation. The electrolytes are usually mixtures of alkali-halide salts and are used with the Li(Si)/FeS2 or Li(Si)/CoS2 couples. Some batteries also employ anodes of Li(Al) in place of the Li(Si) anodes. Insulation and internal heat sinks are used to maintain the electrolyte in its molten and conductive condition during the time of use. Reserve batteries are inactive and inert when manufactured and become active and begin to produce power only when they are activated.
Thermal batteries have long been used in munitions and other similar applications to provide a relatively large amount of power during a relatively short period of time, mainly during the munitions flight. Thermal batteries have high power density and can provide a large amount of power as long as the electrolyte of the thermal battery stays liquid, thereby conductive. The process of manufacturing thermal batteries is highly labor intensive and requires relatively expensive facilities. Fabrication usually involves costly batch processes, including pressing electrodes and electrolytes into rigid wafers, and assembling batteries by hand. The batteries are encased in a hermetically-sealed metal container that is usually cylindrical in shape. Thermal batteries, however, have the advantage of very long shelf life of up to 20 years that is required for munitions applications.
Thermal batteries generally use some type of igniter to provide a controlled pyrotechnic reaction to produce output gas, flame or hot particles to ignite the heating elements of the thermal battery. There are currently two distinct classes of igniters that are available for use in thermal batteries. The first class of igniter operates based on electrical energy. Such electrical igniters, however, require electrical energy, thereby requiring an onboard battery or other power sources with related shelf life and/or complexity and volume requirements to operate and initiate the thermal battery. The second class of igniters, commonly called “inertial igniters”, operates based on the tiring acceleration. The inertial igniters do not require onboard batteries for their operation and are thereby often used in high-G munitions applications such as in gun-fired munitions and mortars.
In general, the inertial igniters, particularly those that are designed to operate at relatively low impact levels, have to be provided with the means for distinguishing events such as accidental drops or explosions in their vicinity from the firing acceleration levels above which they are designed to be activated. This means that safety in terms of prevention of accidental ignition is one of the main concerns in inertial igniters.
In recent years, new improved chemistries and manufacturing processes have been developed that promise the development of lower cost and higher performance thermal batteries that could be produced in various shapes and sizes, including their small and miniaturized versions. However, the existing inertial igniters are relatively large and not suitable for small and low power thermal batteries, particularly those that are being developed for use in miniaturized fuzing, future smart munitions, and other similar applications.
The need to differentiate accidental and initiation accelerations by the resulting impulse level of the event necessitates the employment of a safety system which is capable of allowing initiation of the igniter only during high total impulse levels. The safety mechanism can be thought of as a mechanical delay mechanism, after which a separate initiation system is actuated or released to provide ignition of the pyrotechnics. An inertial igniter that combines such a safety system with an impact based initiation system and its alternative embodiments are described herein together with alternative methods of initiation pyrotechnics.
Inertia-based igniters must therefore comprise two components so that together they provide the aforementioned mechanical safety (delay mechanism) and to provide the required striking action to achieve ignition of the pyrotechnic elements. The function of the safety system is to fix the striker in position until a specified acceleration time profile actuates the safety system and releases the striker, allowing it to accelerate toward its target under the influence of the remaining portion of the specified acceleration time profile. The ignition itself may take place as a result of striker impact, or simply contact or proximity. For example, the striker may be akin to a firing pin and the target akin to a standard percussion cap primer. Alternately, the striker-target pair may bring together one or more chemical compounds whose combination with or without impact will set off a reaction resulting in the desired ignition.
In addition to having a required acceleration time profile which will actuate the device, requirements also commonly exist for non-actuation and survivability. For example, the design requirements for actuation for one application are summarized as:
1. The device must fire when given a |square| pulse acceleration of 900 G 150 G for 15 ms in the setback direction.
2. The device must not fire when given a |square| pulse acceleration of 2000 G for 0.5 ms in any direction.
3. The device must not actuate when given a ½-sine pulse acceleration of 490 G (peak) with a maximum duration of 4 ms.
4. The device must be able to survive an acceleration of 16,000 G, and preferably be able to survive an acceleration of 50,000 G.
A schematic of a cross-section of a conventional thermal battery and inertial igniter assembly is shown in
With currently available inertial igniters, a schematic of which is shown in
A schematic of a cross-section of a currently available inertial igniter 20 is shown in
A safety component 66, which is biased to stay in its upper most position as shown in
The aforementioned currently available inertial igniters have a number of shortcomings for use in thermal batteries, specifically, they are not useful for relatively small thermal batteries for munitions with the aim of occupying relatively small volumes. i.e., to achieve relatively small height total igniter compartment height 13.
A need therefore exists for novel miniature inertial igniters for thermal batteries used in gun fired munitions, particularly for small and low power thermal batteries that could be used in fuzing and other similar applications, thereby eliminating the need for external power sources. The innovative inertial igniters can be scalable to thermal batteries of various sizes, in particular to miniaturized igniters for small size thermal batteries. Such inertial igniters must be safe and in general and in particular they should not initiate if dropped. e.g., from up to 7 feet onto a concrete floor for certain applications; should withstand high firing accelerations, for example up to 20-50.000 Gs; and should be able to be designed to ignite at specified acceleration levels when subjected to such accelerations for a specified amount of time to match the firing acceleration experienced in a gun barrel as compared to high G accelerations experienced during accidental falls which last over very short periods of time, for example accelerations of the order of 1000 Gs when applied for 5 msec as experienced in a gun as compared to for example 2000 G acceleration levels experienced during accidental fall over a concrete floor but which may last only 0.5 msec. Reliability is also of much concern since the rounds should have a shelf life of up to 20 years and could generally be stored at temperatures of sometimes in the range of 65 to 165 degrees F. This requirement is usually satisfied best if the igniter pyrotechnic is in a sealed compartment. The inertial igniters must also consider the manufacturing costs and simplicity in design to make them cost effective for munitions applications.
To ensure safety and reliability, inertial igniters should not initiate during acceleration events which may occur during manufacture, assembly, handling, transport, accidental drops, etc. Additionally, once under the influence of an acceleration profile particular to the firing of ordinance from a gun, the device should initiate with high reliability. In many applications, these two requirements often compete with respect to acceleration magnitude, but differ greatly in impulse. For example, an accidental drop may well cause very high acceleration levels—even in some cases higher than the firing of a shell from a gun. However, the duration of this accidental acceleration will be short, thereby subjecting the inertial igniter to significantly lower resulting impulse levels. It is also conceivable that the igniter will experience incidental low but long-duration accelerations, whether accidental or as part of normal handling, which must be guarded against initiation. Again, the impulse given to the miniature inertial igniter will have a great disparity with that given by the initiation acceleration profile because the magnitude of the incidental long-duration acceleration will be quite low.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inertial igniters disclosed herein may provide one or more of the following advantages over prior art inertial igniters;
provide inertial igniters that are significantly shorter and smaller in volume than currently available inertial igniters for thermal batteries or the like, particularly relatively small thermal batteries to be used in munitions without occupying very large volumes;
provide inertial igniters that can be mounted directly onto the thermal batteries without a housing (such as housing 21 shown in
provide inertial igniters that can directly initiate the pyrotechnics materials inside the thermal battery without the need for intermediate ignition material (such as the additional material 23 shown in
provide inertia igniters that could be constructed to guide the pyrotechnic flame essentially downward (in the direction opposite to the direction of the firing acceleration—usually for mounting on the top of the thermal battery as shown in
provide inertial igniters that allow the use of standard off-the-shelf percussion cap primers instead of specially designed pyrotechnic components; and
provide inertial igniters that can be sealed to simplify storage and increase their shelf life.
Accordingly, inertial igniters for use with thermal batteries for producing power upon acceleration are provided.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the apparatus of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
a illustrates a schematic of the isometric drawing of a first embodiment of an inertial igniter together with the top cap of a thermal battery to which it is attached.
h illustrates a second view of the isometric drawing of the first embodiment of the inertial igniter of
c illustrates a schematic of the isometric drawing of a first embodiment of an inertial igniter of
a and 11b illustrate an isometric and a schematic of a cross-section, respectively, of a fourth embodiment of an inertial igniter in initiation position.
A schematic of a cross-section of a first embodiment of an inertia igniter is shown in
The inertial igniter 30 with the thermal battery top cap 36 is shown in the isometric drawings of
A striker mass 39 is shown in its locked position in
In this embodiment, a two-part pyrotechnics compound is shown to be used.
In general, various combinations of pyrotechnic materials may be used for this purpose. One commonly used pyrotechnic material consists of red phosphorous or nano-aluminum, indicated as element 46 in
The basic operation of the disclosed inertial igniter 30 will now be described with reference to
Assuming that the acceleration time profile was at or above the specified “all-fire” profile, the dead coil section 45 will have translated down full-stroke d2, allowing the striker mass 39 to accelerate down towards the base 32. In such a situation, since the locking halls 42 are no longer constrained by the dead coil section 45, the downward force that the striker mass 39 has been exerting on the locking balls 42 will force the locking balls 42 to move outward in the radial direction. Once the locking balls 42 are out of the way of the dimples 43, the downward motion of the striker mass 39 is impeded only by the elastic force of the setback spring 44, which is easily overcome by the impulse provided to the striker mass 39. As a result, the striker mass 39 moves downward, causing the parts 46 and 47 of the two-part pyrotechnic compound to strike with the requisite energy to initiate ignition. The configuration of the inertial igniter 30 when the balls 42 are free to move outward in the radial direction, thereby releasing the striker mass 39 is shown in the schematic of
In another embodiment, the dead coil section 45 may be constructed as a separate collar and positioned similarly over the setback spring 44. The collar replacing the dead coil section 45 may also be attached to the top coil of the setback spring 44, e.g., by welding, brazing, or adhesives such as epoxy, or the like. The advantage of attaching the collar to the top of the setback spring 44 is that it would help prevent it to get struck over the posts 33 as it is being pushed down by the applied acceleration in the direction of the arrow 48,
Alternatively, the dead coil section 45 and the setback spring 44 may be integral, made out of for example, a cylindrical section with spiral or other type shaped cuts over its lower section to provide the required axial flexibility to serve the function of the setback spring 44. The upper portion of this cylinder is preferably left intact to serve the function of the dead coil section 45,
It is appreciated by those skilled in the art that by varying the mass of the striker 39, the mass of the dead coil section 45, the spring rate of the setback spring 44, the distance that the dead coil section 45 has to travel downward to release the locking halls 42 and thereby release the striker mass 39, and the distance between the parts 46 and 47 of the two-part pyrotechnic compound, the designer of the disclosed inertial igniter 30 can match the lire and no-fire impulse level requirements for various applications as well as the safety (delay or dwell action) protection against accidental dropping of the inertial igniter and/or the munitions or the like within which it is assembled.
Briefly, the safety system parameters. i.e., the mass of the dead coil section 45, the spring rate of the setback spring 44 and the dwell stroke (the distance that the dead coil section 44 has to travel downward to release the locking halls 42 and thereby release the striker mass 39) must be tuned to provide the required actuation performance characteristics. Similarly, to provide the requisite impact energy, the mass of the striker 39 and the separation distance between the parts 46 and 47 of the two-part pyrotechnic compound must work together to provide the specified impact energy to initiate the pyrotechnic compound when subjected to the remaining portion of the prescribed initiation acceleration profile after the safety system has been actuated.
In addition, since the safety and striker systems each require a certain actuation distance to achieve the necessary performance, the most axially compact design is realized by nesting the two systems in parallel as it is done in the embodiment of
In another embodiment, the two-part pyrotechnics 46 and 47,
The striker mass 39 and striker tip 50 may be a monolithic design with the striking tip 50 being a machined boss protruding from the striker mass, or the striker tip 50 may be a separate piece pressed or otherwise permanently fixed to the striker mass. A two-piece design would be favorable to the need for a striker whose density is different than steel, but whose tip would remain hard and tough by attaching a steel ball, hemisphere, or other shape to the striker mass. A monolithic design, however, would be generally favorable to manufacturing because of the reduction of part quantity and assembly operations.
An advantage of using the two component pyrotechnic materials as shown in
The disclosed inertial igniters are seen to discharge the ignition fire and sparks directly into the thermal battery.
The disclosed inertial igniters are shown sealed within their housing, thereby simplifying their storage and increase their shelf life.
b shows the schematic of a cross-section of another embodiment 90. This embodiment is similar to the embodiment shown in
While there has been shown and described what is considered to be preferred embodiments of the invention, it will, of course, be understood that various modifications and changes in form or detail could readily be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention be not limited to the exact forms described and illustrated, but should be constructed to cover all modifications that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of SBIR Grant No. DAAE30-03-C-1077 awarded by the Department of Defense on Jul. 17, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3814018 | Daniel | Jun 1974 | A |
3842740 | Mirlesse | Oct 1974 | A |
4449455 | Halssig | May 1984 | A |
4487127 | Luebbers | Dec 1984 | A |
4969397 | Gunther et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5872324 | Watson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6536347 | Zacharin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7437995 | Rastegar et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7587980 | Rastegar et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20080217144 | Honer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100071577 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |