The invention is generally directed to the field of axles for two-wheeled vehicles. The invention is especially directed to the field of bicycle axles especially suitable for use in high stress and/or competitive applications, such as downhill, extreme, and free riding.
All patents, patent applications, and other publications, referred to herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety into this patent application.
Today's high performance two-wheeled vehicle is often subjected to extreme riding conditions. Accordingly, riders expect precise steering, robust construction, and improved resistance to torsional and shear forces.
Therefore, designers seek improvements to, for example, axle technology and how axles are retained to vehicle frames.
For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,632,415 (San Hai), the fork ends have bearings for receiving a spindle that supports a wheel hub. The spindle is one piece and has threads on one end that, when the spindle is supported by its bearings, projects out of its bearing. A nut is then threaded onto the threaded end of the spindle to secure the spindle to the front fork. The fact that the non-threaded, enlarged end of San Hai's spindle appears to have a screwdriver slot implies this design was not meant for tool-free use and was certainly not ergonomically designed.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,635 (Maeda), a motorcycle axle having a threaded end for engaging an axle nut is described. The axle nut is then clamped in a split-clamp axle holder. However, the threads of the axle never engage complementary threads of the axle holder, since there are no such complementary threads.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,412,803 (Lalikyan), an inverted front fork and wheel assembly for bicycles and motorcycles includes an axle having non-circular end portions that are clamped within corresponding non-circular dropout openings, thereby to increase the torsional stiffness of the fork.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,894 (Kanchisa), a hub axle is provided that is preferably a one-piece unitary member made from a suitable rigid material. Similar to the '415 patent mentioned above, the hub axle has threads on one end that, when the hub axle is supported by its bearings, projects out of its bearing. A nut is then threaded onto the threads of the end of the hub axle to secure the hub axle to the front fork. Also, as with the '415 patent, the fact that the enlarged end of Kanchisa's head portion is described as being a tool engaging portion, implies this design was not meant for tool-free use and was also certainly not ergonomically designed.
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,308 (Rose), a multi-component axle assembly for mounting a wheel to a vehicle is described. The tubular body, while having a threaded end for engaging complementary threads in one of the dropouts, has at least one slot in each end that allows radial deformation of the tubular body when the clamp lever is placed in the clamping position.
In the Rockshox TULLIO™ system (see 2002 Rockshox Psylo U-Turn Service Guide, pp. 8-10), a simply machined tubular axle member had a threaded bearing end for capture in a threaded split-clamp pinch-bearing and a separate smooth bearing end for capture in a smoothly machined split-clamp pinch bearing. The TULLIO system included a lever for rotating the axle so that the threads of the TULLIO axle can be captured by the complementary threads of the split-clamp pinch bearing. The lever, during non-use, was pivoted until it was parallel with the longitudinal axis of the axle and then pushed into a stowed position inside the lever-retaining component. The lever-retaining component was screwed into the smooth bearing end of the tubular axle member making the TULLIO system a multi-component axle assembly. Clamps were used for opening and closing the split-clamp pinch bearings. The TULLIO system is also described in GB 2,414,971 (Bartlett).
While in GB 1,336,620 (Mannesmannrohren-Werke GMBH), a method of forming a generic axle (no application mentioned) using forging of a hollow tube is described, there appears to have been little discussion in the prior art about the methods used to manufacture motorcycle or bicycle axles and how those methods may be integrated into the axle assembly process (e.g. axle attachment to vehicle).
Some common prior art methods for manufacturing motorcycle or bicycle axles include machining a tubular or solid metallic extrusion or billet and internally and externally swaging and forming from steel tube stock. These methods are not necessarily cost effective. Additionally, these methods do not easily lead to one-piece and ergonomically shaped end products.
Accordingly, there is room for improvement within the art.
Introduction
This patent application describes the invention in the context of an exemplary embodiment of a front axle for a bicycle and how that exemplary axle is mounted to an exemplary front bicycle suspension fork. However, the teachings and scope of the invention—especially as related to the manufacture of the axle body, itself—are equally applicable to a front or rear wheel of any two-wheeled vehicle.
Basic Axle Structure
First bearing portion 16 includes threads 19 positioned adjacent the first end 12 of the axle body 11 and a smooth bearing surface 20 inwardly spaced from threads 19 and the first end 12 of axle body 11. Threads 19 are for mounting in complementary threads 101 in a corresponding threaded dropout 99 (see
Second bearing portion 17 includes an enlarged diameter (relative to the first bearing surface 20) smooth bearing surface 21 for insertion into a corresponding non-threaded and smooth dropout 98 (see discussion of
The second end 13 of axle body 11 includes an ergonomically designed grip portion 22. Grip portion 22 may include first and second opposed wings 23a, 23b, extending outward from the longitudinal axis of the axle body 11 beyond the bearing surfaces of axle body 11. Accordingly, under such conditions, the wings 23a, 23b would be the widest portion of axle body 11. As shown in
A lever 26 may be provided for rotating axle assembly 10 about is longitudinal axis so that the threads 19 of axle assembly 10 may interlock with the threads of the dropout 99. Lever 26 may be pivotable (see curved arrow A-A of
In applications where tool-free mounting of axle assembly 10 is not important, as shown in
Whether lever 26 or an external tool T is used, grip portion 22 and tubular body 15 remain a one-piece axle body 11. This one-piece construction reduces production costs as well as opportunities for the axle components to separate when subjected to extreme forces. Thus, the current exemplary one-piece design is more robust and useful in high-stress applications than prior art multi-component designs.
Exemplary Use of Axle
In
Split-clamp pinch bearing 100 will have a completely smooth bearing-like surface finish for engagement with smooth bearing surface 21 of axle assembly 10. Split-clamp pinch bearing 100′ will have a partially smooth bearing-like finish for engagement with bearing surface 20 of axle assembly 10 and threads 101 complementary to threads 19. In
In
In
While the previous discussion has been in the context of installing the axle assembly 10, one skilled in the art would recognize that in the context of un-installing the axle assembly 10, the above process would merely be reversed.
Exemplary Method of Making the Axle
Using, for example, conventional hammer forging machinery (not shown), a first portion of the solid blank will be forged into a solid enlarged portion 50 (see
Then, again using conventional hammer forging (or impact extrusion) machinery (not shown), a second portion of the same solid blank will be formed into tubular body portion 15. This early form of axle body 11 will have inner walls defining a through bore 15′, but the through bore 15′ will be closed off at second end 13 and enlarged portion 50 and open at first end 12 (See
Note that it may be possible to combine the two forging steps into one depending upon, for example, part complexity and sophistication of available machine shop equipment.
After forging, enlarged portion 50 is finally formed into finished grip portion 22, shaped as previously described above. To achieve this, the most basic 2D machining methods can be used to finish manufacturing axle body 11. No complex 3D surface machining methods, which are typically expensive and tedious to program and implement, are needed. Additionally, if solid billet material was used according to prior art methods, a large amount of time would be spent removing material to achieve this axle diameter, due to the large diameter of the grip portion.
Thus, according to the exemplary method, for example, using conventional machine shop cutting tools, as shown in
Then, the outer diameter of the bearing portion 21 and the outer diameter of tubular body portion 15 are smoothened and dimensioned using, for example, basic 2D machine tools (not shown) and threads 19 may be cut into the surface of axle assembly 10 at its first end 12 (
Finally, before attaching lever 26 to grip portion 20 via fastener 30, axle assembly 10 may be cleaned, de-burred, polished, and anodized, as well as treated according to any other known mechanical or chemical processing methods. Additionally, clip ring 27 will be installed into clip ring retaining groove 27′.
While the invention has been described with respect to certain exemplary structural and method embodiments, the invention shall only be limited by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/862,519, filed on Jan. 4, 2018, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 15/862,519 is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/584,477, filed on May 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,862,453, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 15/584,477 is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/293,695, filed on Jun. 2, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,643,451, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 14/293,695 is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/343,338, filed on Jan. 4, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,770,610, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 13/343,338 is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/794,269, filed on Jun. 4, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,091,909, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 12/794,269 is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/362,654, filed on Jan. 30, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,731,214, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The application Ser. No. 12/362,654 is a divisional of and claims the benefit of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/647,471, filed on Feb. 13, 2007, now abandoned, entitled “AXLES, SUCH AS FOR BICYCLES” by Andrew Laird, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2829431 | Brauchler | Apr 1958 | A |
3153491 | MacTavish et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
4361360 | Kuether | Nov 1982 | A |
4424981 | Maxwell | Jan 1984 | A |
4632415 | San Hai | Dec 1986 | A |
4763957 | Poehlmann et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5257855 | Nagano | Nov 1993 | A |
5549315 | Ashman | Aug 1996 | A |
5622412 | Yamane | Apr 1997 | A |
5626401 | Terry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5909931 | Tabe | Jun 1999 | A |
5984423 | Becker | Nov 1999 | A |
6089675 | Schlanger | Jul 2000 | A |
6109635 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6412803 | Lalikyan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6581494 | Sechler | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6886894 | Kanehisa et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6964425 | Turner | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7090308 | Rose et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7155824 | Prucher | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7412866 | Jahani et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7494145 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7537291 | Hara | May 2009 | B2 |
9643451 | Laird | May 2017 | B2 |
9862453 | Laird | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10300980 | Laird | May 2019 | B2 |
20040036251 | Baldwin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20130328385 | Kuo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150266341 | Lin | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20180127051 | Laird | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1336620 | Nov 1973 | GB |
2414971 | Dec 2005 | GB |
9850268 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2004024366 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Photo taken Feb. 2007: Front Axle from a 2005 Honda CFR250X. |
“Rockshox Psylo U-Turn Service Guide”, 2002, 8-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190233047 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11674471 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 12362654 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15862519 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16382087 | US | |
Parent | 15584477 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15862519 | US | |
Parent | 14293695 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15584477 | US | |
Parent | 13343338 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14293695 | US | |
Parent | 12794269 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13343338 | US | |
Parent | 12362654 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 12794269 | US |