In a broad aspect, the present invention relates to therapeutic B lymphocyte (B cell) depleting antibodies and methods and uses thereof in the treatment of patients having central nervous system injuries.
There is no admission that the background art disclosed in this section legally constitutes prior art.
Traumatic injury to the mammalian spinal cord activates B lymphocytes (B cells) culminating in the synthesis of autoantibodies. The functional significance of this immune response is unclear. The consequences of neuroinflammation caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) have been inferred mostly from studies manipulating the function or survival of neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages or T lymphocytes (T cells). Less is known about the role played by antibody-producing B cells.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers immune responses that can simultaneously exacerbate tissue injury and promote central nervous system (CNS) repair. After SCI, B cells produce antibodies that bind CNS and non-CNS antigens. This component of the immune response exacerbates pathology caused by SCI.
Revealing the identity and source of these antibodies is highly desirable since it is clear that not all antibodies are pathogenic and even those with this capacity may trigger repair at lower concentrations.
Until the inventors' latest discovery (which forms the basis of at least a part of the present invention), a causal role for B cells as effectors of post-SCI pathology has not been proven. Described herein is this latest discovery by the inventors that provides methods and uses of antibodies in the treatment of patients having CNS injuries.
In a first broad aspect, there is provided herein use of a therapeutic B lymphocyte (B cell) depleting antibody in a patient in need thereof to block B cell-mediated pathology in human or animal neurological disorders.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of anti-CD20 antibodies. In one embodiment, the anti-CD20 antibodies are selected from Rituximab or Ocrelizumab.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of a combination of anti-CD79alpha and anti-CD79beta antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the human or animal neurological disorders include traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In another broad aspect, there is provided herein use of a B lymphocyte (B cell) therapy for lessening the severity of tissue damage and for restoring locomotor function in a patient in need thereof.
In a further broad aspect, there is provided herein use of a B cell depleting antibody for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of a neurological disorder.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is in a subject having a traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is an anti-CD20 antibody.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is selected from rituximab and antibodies directed against B cell surface molecules, more preferably antibodies directed against B cell specific surface molecules, such as CD20.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in a dose of 1 mg to 1 g, preferably 100 mg to 800 mg, more preferably 250 mg to 750 mg, most preferably 300 mg to 500 mg.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in one dose every 2-20 days, preferably one dose every 7-14 days.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in one dose every 1-3 days.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in 1-20 doses in total, preferably in 1-10 doses, more preferably 1-8 doses, and most preferably 1-4 doses in total.
In certain embodiments, the administration is systemical, preferably via injection or infusion, more preferably an intravenous injection or infusion.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered to a subject in need thereof, and the administration results in a prevention of a deterioration of neurological function.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered prior to or after a different treatment modality.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in combination with other medication.
In another broad aspect, there is provided herein a method treating a patient with a neurological disorder. The method includes providing a therapeutic B lymphocyte (B cell) depleting antibody to block B cell-mediated pathology in the patient. The method further includes depleting B cells via infusion of antibodies in the patient to lessen the severity of tissue damage and to restore locomotor function in the patient.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of anti-CD20 antibodies. In one embodiment, the anti-CD20 antibodies are selected from Rituximab or Ocrelizumab.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of a combination of anti-CD79alpha and anti-CD79beta antibodies.
In a further broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a neurological disorder. The method includes administering to a subject in need thereof effective amounts of an anti-CD20 antibody such that administration of the anti-CD20 antibody provides a synergistic improvement in the incidence or symptoms of a neurological disorder.
In certain embodiments, the anti-CD20 antibody is a non T cell depleting antibody.
In certain embodiments, the anti-CD20 antibody is a humanized antibody.
In a still further broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a subject suffering from or predisposed to a neurological disorder. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective amount of at least one B cell depleting antibody to the subject.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibodies are monoclonal antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the monoclonal antibodies are selected from chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is selected from traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemic, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to a CD20 antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is Rituximab and/or Ocrelizumab.
In another broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a subject suffering from or predisposed to a neurological disorder. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective amount of at least one immunoregulatory antibody to the subject such that the immunoregulatory antibody binds to an antigen selected from CD79alpha, CD79beta and CD20 antigens.
In certain embodiments, the immunoregulatory antibody is a monoclonal antibody.
In certain embodiments, the monoclonal antibody is selected from chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is selected from traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemic, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the method further includes the step of administering a B cell depleting antibody.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD20 antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD79alpha antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD79beta antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to a combination of CD79alpha and CD79beta antigens.
Other methods, uses, features, and advantages of the present invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional methods, uses, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Throughout this disclosure, various publications, patents and published patent specifications, are referenced by an identifying citation. The disclosures of these publications, patents and published patent specifications, are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains.
In one aspect, there is provided herein use of a therapeutic B lymphocyte (B cell) depleting antibody in a patient in need thereof to block B cell-mediated pathology in human or animal neurological disorders.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of anti-CD20 antibodies. In one embodiment, the anti-CD20 antibodies are selected from Rituximab or Ocrelizumab. Non-limiting examples of anti-CD20 antibodies include Rituximab, Ocrelizumab,
It should be understood that other appropriate anti-human antibodies, including those currently in development, may be used in conjunction with the present invention.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of a combination of anti-CD79alpha and anti-CD79beta antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the human or animal neurological disorders include traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In another aspect, there is provided herein use of a B lymphocyte (B cell) therapy for lessening the severity of tissue damage and for restoring locomotor function in a patient in need thereof.
In a further broad aspect, there is provided herein use of a B cell depleting antibody for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of a neurological disorder.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is in a subject having a traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is an anti-CD20 antibody.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is selected from rituximab and antibodies directed against B cell surface molecules, more preferably antibodies directed against B-cell specific surface molecules, such as CD20.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in a dose of 1 mg to 1 g, preferably 100 mg to 800 mg, more preferably 250 mg to 750 mg, most preferably 300 mg to 500 mg.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in one dose every 2-20 days, preferably one dose every 7-14 days.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in one dose every 1-3 days.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in 1-20 doses in total, preferably in 1-10 doses, more preferably 1-8 doses, and most preferably 1-4 doses in total.
In certain embodiments, the administration is systemical, preferably via injection or infusion, more preferably an intravenous injection or infusion.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered to a subject in need thereof, and the administration results in a prevention of a deterioration of neurological function.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered prior to or after a different treatment modality.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is administered in combination with other medication.
In another broad aspect, there is provided herein a method treating a patient with a neurological disorder. The method includes providing a therapeutic B lymphocyte (B cell) depleting antibody to block B cell-mediated pathology in the patient. The method further includes depleting B cells via infusion of antibodies in the patient to lessen the severity of tissue damage and to restore locomotor function in the patient.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of anti-CD20 antibodies. In one embodiment, the anti-CD20 antibodies are selected from Rituximab or Ocrelizumab.
In certain embodiments, B cells are depleted via infusion of a combination of anti-CD79alpha and anti-CD79beta antibodies.
In a further broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a neurological disorder. The method includes administering to a subject in need thereof effective amounts of an anti-CD20 antibody such that administration of the anti-CD20 antibody provides a synergistic improvement in the incidence or symptoms of a neurological disorder.
In certain embodiments, the anti-CD20 antibody is a non T cell depleting antibody.
In certain embodiments, the anti-CD20 antibody is a humanized antibody.
In a still further broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a subject suffering from or predisposed to a neurological disorder. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective amount of at least one B cell depleting antibody to the subject.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibodies are monoclonal antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the monoclonal antibodies are selected from chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is selected from traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to a CD20 antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody is Rituximab and/or Ocrelizumab.
In another broad aspect, there is provided herein a method of treating a subject suffering from or predisposed to a neurological disorder. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective amount of at least one immunoregulatory antibody to the subject such that the immunoregulatory antibody binds to an antigen selected from CD79alpha, CD79beta and CD20 antigens.
In certain embodiments, the immunoregulatory antibody is a monoclonal antibody.
In certain embodiments, the monoclonal antibody is selected from chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies. It should be understood that any appropriate chimeric and human antibodies, including those currently in development, may be used in conjunction with the present invention.
In certain embodiments, the neurological disorder is selected from traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, spinal ischemia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia.
In certain embodiments, the method further includes the step of administering a B cell depleting antibody.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD20 antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD79alpha antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to CD79beta antigen.
In certain embodiments, the B cell depleting antibody reacts with or binds to a combination of CD79alpha and CD79beta antigens.
Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal cord injury (SCI) potently activates B cells, culminating with increased synthesis of autoantibodies. There is a seemingly paradoxical effect of SCI on B cell function, i.e., complete spinal cord transection at high thoracic levels (T3) induces marked apoptosis of splenic B cells within 72 hours post-injury. Experimental immunizations during this acute post-injury interval fail to elicit antibody synthesis. This phenomenon appears to be level-dependent as neither complete spinal transection nor incomplete spinal contusion injury at mid-thoracic level (T9) causes significant B cell apoptosis. On the contrary, T9 spinal contusion activates B cells within 24 hours post-injury causing them to secrete IgM then IgG antibodies. Then, after about 14 days, significant levels of autoantibodies are detected in T9 SCI mice. Despite the rapid onset of acute immune suppression in this model, B cell function, including synthesis of autoantibodies, may be restored at later times post-injury. Indeed, although injuries at cervical or lower spinal levels in humans cause immune suppression, high titers of CNS-reactive autoantibodies also exist in these individuals. Additional functions of B cells, including their potential role as antigen presenting cells or immune-regulatory cells, should also be considered as these functions may predominate during the acute phase of injury (less than 14 days post-injury), i.e., before significant production of autoantibodies is detectable.
Clq binds antigen-antibody (immune) complexes, which initiates enzymatic conversion of other complement proteins. The result is formation of a lytic membrane attack complex and recruitment/activation of myeloid lineage cells (e.g., microglia/macrophages) that bear complement receptors. Using a model of spinal contusion injury, there was observed marked neuroprotection in mice that could not make immune complexes (i.e., BCKO mice); these mice had minimal Clq deposition at/nearby sites of SCI. Conversely, in SCI WT mice, intraspinal antibody deposits co-localize with Clq labeling. Thus, delayed accumulation of intraspinal antibodies causes pathology in part by activating complement. Recently, a deficiency in Clq was shown to be neuroprotective and promote functional recovery after SCI or traumatic brain injury.
Injection of pathogenic SCI antibodies into the spinal cord of complement deficient mice is benign relative to that caused by identical injections into wild-type (WT) spinal cord. Injection of SCI antibodies into FcR-deficient mice produced similarly mild injuries that may show SCI antibodies also initiate inflammation by ligating Fc receptors on macrophages, microglia or other FcR-bearing immune cells.
Despite the delayed and chronic accumulation of intraspinal B cell clusters and autoantibodies, a decline in locomotor function does not occur at later times post-injury in WT mice. Instead, functional recovery plateaus. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors herein believe that this may indicate that antibodies are antagonizing mechanisms of endogenous repair rather than causing direct toxicity to cells that area unaffected by the primary trauma. For example, the inventors have evidence that autoantibodies specific for proteins in axonal growth cones are increased after SCI. Antibody binding to growth cones could block axonal plasticity and/or long tract regeneration. Post-SCI elevations of anti-endothelial antibodies may also thwart the repair of the microvasculature thereby limiting the supply of oxygen and nutrients to the spinal parenchyma.
As antibody levels rise and parallel inflammatory cascades are initiated, antibodies cause pathology; even monomeric IgG becomes pathologic at high concentrations. In particular, BCKO mice show progressive functional recovery with reduced pathology at times when B cell activation and antibody synthesis appear to limit recovery levels in WT mice. Since the sterile inflammation and tissue destruction caused by intraspinal injection of SCI antibodies was mitigated in complement or FcR deficient mice, these mechanisms of immunity are activated downstream of B cell activation and antibody synthesis after SCI. IgG/Clq deposits co-localize near sites of tissue injury, including areas of visible neuron pathology, and functional recovery is improved in complement-deficient mice. A further explanation for the inventors' results is that the post-injury rise in circulating and CSF antibodies is a mechanism of protein homeostasis. In acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis, circulating IgG levels rise precipitously but without a proportional change in immune complex formation in the kidney. This is of interest since pathogenic antibodies cause kidney pathology in this disease. High titers of IgG may assist in “buffering” pathogenic proteins, including antibodies, while minimizing the loss or degradation of proteins (e.g., albumin) that are depleted during the course of the disease.
As shown in the Example set forth below, the present data reveal an unexpected role for B cells and antibodies as effectors of pathology after SCI. Various self-antigens are released or become altered by SCI causing B cell activation and secretion of antibodies that trigger pathogenic complement cascades and microglia/macrophages.
The present invention is further defined in the following Example, in which all parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius, unless otherwise stated. It should be understood that this Example, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, is given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and this Example, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. All publications, including patents and non-patent literature, referred to in this specification are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Mice
Specific pathogen-free C57BL/6J [wild-type (WT), n=28], IgH-6 [B cell knockout (BCKO), n=17)], and B6.12954-C3tmlCrr/J [complement component C3 knockout (C3−/−), n=4] mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me.). Fcerlg [FcRγ knockout mice (FcR−/−), n=6] were obtained from Taconic Farms (Hudson, N.Y.). BL 10, B10.PL and Balb/cJ mice were obtained from Harlan Labs (Indianapolis, Ind.). All mice were females, age 7-8 weeks and weighed 17-22 g at the time of surgery. All mice were housed in HEPA-filtered Bio-clean units in a sterile room (barrier housing). All procedures were approved by and performed in accordance with The Ohio State University's Institutional Lab Animal Care and Use Committee.
Spinal Cord Injury
Mice received a mid-thoracic spinal contusion injury using the Ohio State University electromechanical spinal contusion device. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (80 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg respectively, i.p.), then given prophylactic antibiotics (Gentocin; 1 mg/kg, s.q.). Using aseptic technique, a partial vertebral laminectomy was performed at the mid-thoracic level (T9-10). The exposed dorsal spinal surface (T9 spinal level) was displaced a calibrated vertical distance (0.5 mm over about 25 ms), producing a moderately severe spinal cord injury. After surgery, muscles and skin were sutured and mice hydrated with physiological saline (2 ml, s.q.). Bladders were voided manually 2×/day and hydration was monitored daily and urinary pH monitored weekly. All animals were within normal parameters of displacement, force and impulse-momentum (Grubb's test to detect outliers; t-test comparing biomechanic parameters between groups or individual strains yielded p-values>0.72 for all measures).
Behavioral Analysis—BMS Test and Subscore
Locomotor recovery was compared using the BMS locomotor rating scale specifically designed for use in SCI mice. The BMS is a 10-point scale based on operational definitions of hind limb movement with additional emphasis placed on evaluating trunk stability. Briefly, individual mice were simultaneously observed by two investigators for a four-minute testing period, during which hind limb movements, trunk/tail stability and forelimb-hindlimb coordination were assessed then graded according to published methods. The subscore component of the BMS scores individual aspects of fine locomotor control for the hindlimbs (e.g., paw rotation at initial contact) and trunk/tail (e.g., ability to maintain tail in upright position during locomotion), e.g., aspects of locomotion that if they were to change alone they would not necessarily change the overall BMS score.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Collections
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected from anesthetized mice at 63 dpi via the cisterna magna. Briefly, a sharpened 0.5 μL Hamilton syringe was used to puncture then aspirate about 10 μL of clear CSF. Mice were then immediately perfused as outlined below. CSF samples were transferred to individual tubes and frozen at −80° C. Total Ig levels were measured by ELISA.
Serum Collection
Whole blood was obtained from awake, unrestrained mice via retro-orbital puncture. Samples were collected from SCI mice before injury and at 42 days post spinal cord injury and from uninjured mice at 42 days after laminectomy (see below).
Purification of Antibodies from SCI and Uninjured Serum Total serum IgM and IgG were purified in a multi-step procedure using products from Thermo Scientific-Pierce (Rockford, Ill.). Sera samples (n=10 SCI, n=12 uninjured, 30-60 μL/mouse) were randomly selected and pooled to yield 510 μL total serum/group, 10 μL of which was reserved for determination of original Ig “purity” and concentration (see below). The remaining 500 μL samples were subjected to ammonium sulfate precipitation by adding 0.5 mL ice-cold saturated ammonium sulfate (SAS) dropwise over a 15-minute period. Proteins were allowed to precipitate overnight at 4° C., then were spun at 3000×g for 30 min and supernatants (including soluble protein contaminants) discarded. Precipitated proteins (including IgG and IgM) were resuspended in 0.5 mL Melon Gel Purification buffer, pH 7.0 (Thermo Scientific-Pierce), then residual ammonium sulfate was removed by dialyzing in four-400 mL volumes of the same buffer. Dialysis was performed in 20 kD molecular weight cut-off Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis Cassettes (Thermo Scientific-Pierce) with continuous agitation via a stir bar. Dialysis buffer was completely replaced 3×, with the time in each volume being 1 hr, 2 hr, 14 hr, then 1 hr. After dialysis, an additional 10 μL was set aside for testing (see below) and the remaining volume was subjected to IgG purification using the Melon Gel Serum IgG purification kit (Thermo Scientific-Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After completion of the Melon Gel procedure, IgM was purified by eluting bound proteins from the Melon Gel support columns, then passing the remaining non-IgG “contaminants” through centrifugal filtration columns with a 100 kD molecular-weight cut-off. Purified IgG and IgM were combined and again filtered/concentrated in centrifugal filtration columns (100 kD molecular-weight cut-off). The retentate was resuspended in Melon gel purification buffer (pH 7.2) to identical concentrations (0.59 mg total IgM+IgG/mL) and stored at 4° C. until used for injection (within five days). Resulting samples were evaluated for Ig purity and concentration by SDS-Page/western blot and ELISA, respectively (see below and
Verification of Antibody Purity
Verification of antibody purity was determined by SDS-Page and western blotting. For electrophoresis, 10 ng (1.69 μL) total purified protein and equal volumes of pooled, unpurified sera were used. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE on 12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (parallel gels were run identically but total proteins were stained in-gel using Compasses' reagent) Immediately after transfer, membranes were stained for total proteins with Ponceau S, destained, then digitally photographed to visualize protein content. After blocking, membranes were probed with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (H+L, which detects IgM, IgG and IgA). Bound antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence (Millipore Immobilon Western HRP substrate) followed by exposure to autoradiography film (Kodak Biomax).
Determination of Antibody Concentration in Purified Samples
Concentration of total immunoglobulin (IgG and IgM) was determined using ELISA. Briefly, purified antibodies were diluted 1:100 in purification buffer and quadruplicate samples compared to a standard dilution series of purified mouse IgGI (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, Ala.).
Unilateral Antibody Microinjections
Equal volumes and concentrations of purified antibodies from SCI or uninjured mice were microinjected into the right ventral horn (T12 level) of naïve adult WT, C3−/− or FcR−/− mice. Under anesthesia and using sterile technique, a laminectomy was performed (with partial dural reflection) at the T11-12 vertebral level. To ensure accuracy and to minimize pipette-mediated injury caused by respiratory movement, the spinal column was secured via the spinous processes adjacent to the laminectomy site using Adson forceps fixed in a spinal frame. Sterile glass micropipettes (pulled to an external diameter of 25-30 μm and pre-filled with either SCI or uninjured antibodies (0.59 μ.g/1 μl, dissolved in Pierce antibody purification buffer—a sterile, low-salt buffer solution, pH 7.2) was positioned about 0.3 mm lateral to the spinal midline using a hydraulic micropositioner (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, Calif.). From the meningeal surface, pipettes were lowered 0.9 mm into the ventral horn of the underlying gray matter. Using a PicoPump (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, Fla.), 1 μl of purified antibody was injected over 15 minutes. Pipettes remained in place for two additional minutes to allow the injectate to dissipate into the parenchyma. To facilitate localization of the injection sites, the adjacent dura was marked with sterile charcoal. Postsurgical care, including closing of the surgery site, was performed as described for SCI.
Behavioral Evaluation of Antibody Microinjected Animals
Beginning one day after microinjection, mice were placed individually in an open field and then subjected to BMS testing (see above). However, because the injections were made into the right ventral horn and therefore affected the right hind limb only, the maximum score allowed for each animal was 5 (frequent or consistent plantar stepping, without forelimb-hindlimb coordination). After testing, 15-45 second video-clips were taken to further document behavioral differences.
At 42 or 63 days after SCI or at 7 days after intraspinal microinjection, mice were anesthetized then transcardially perfused with 25 mL 0.1M PBS followed by 100 ml 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Brains and spinal cords were removed and post-fixed for 2 hours then stored in 0.2M phosphate buffer (PB) for 18 hours at 4° C. The next day, tissues were placed in 30% sucrose in 0.2M PB and stored for 48-72 hours. Sucrose-infiltrated tissues were rapidly frozen on powdered dry ice then stored at −80° C. Spinal cord segments spanning the lesion (1 cm, centered on the impact or injection site) were blocked and embedded in Tissue Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetechnical Co., Tokyo, Japan), then molds were rapidly frozen with powdered dry ice. From these blocks, 10 μm coronal sections were cut on a cryostat and collected onto SuperfrostPlus slides (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.). SCI and microinjection lesion blocks were collected as 20 sets of serial sections (200 nm between adjacent sections on each slide) and stored at −20° C.
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Adjacent sets of sections encompassing the lesions were stained with eriochrome cyanine (EC) plus cresyl violet (CV) or EC plus anti-mouse 200 kD neurofilament (chicken anti-NFH, see below). When primary antibodies were derived from mice, nonspecific staining was blocked using a cocktail of bovine serum albumin and complete horse and mouse serum for 1 hour at room temperature. After blocking solution was removed, sections were overlayed with pre-conjugated primary and secondary antibody cocktail (e.g., containing mouse anti-neurofilament plus biotinlyated horse anti-mouse IgG diluted in blocking solution). This antibody cocktail was incubated for 18 hours at room temperature or 4° C. In some cases, cell nuclei were revealed using DAPI or Draq5 (Biostatus Limited, UK). A list of primary antibodies and their final concentrations follows: rat anti-mouse Clq (Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.; clone 7H8, 0.133 ng/mL), rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK; clone RA3-6B2, 0.83 μg/mL), mouse anti-mouse CD68 (AbD Serotec; clone FA-11, 1 μg/mL), chicken anti-mouse NFH (Ayes Labs,; 1 ng/mL), mouse-anti-MBP (Covance, Princeton, N.J.; clone SM194, mouse ascites, 1:40000), goat ant-mouse IgG (γ-chain specific, Southern Biotech; 1 μg/mL), goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) F(Ab′)2 fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, Pa.; 1 ng/mL), goat anti-mouse IgG F(Ab′)2 fragments (γ-chain specific, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.; 1 μg/mL).
Quantitative Spared White Matter and Lesion Analyses
Images of EC+CV and EC+NFH-stained sections were digitized using a Zeiss Axioplan II Imaging microscope and an MCID 6.0 Elite system (InterFocus Imaging, Cambridge, UK). High-power digitized sections were printed and areas of spared white matter, spared gray matter, and lesion, were manually circumscribed. Spared white matter is defined as regions containing normal to near-normal densities of both EC and transversely-oriented neurofilament staining. Spared grey matter is defined as tissue containing normal gray matter cytoarchitecture with visibly healthy neuron profiles. Lesion is defined as regions lacking either spared white or gray matter. Uniform point-grids were placed randomly onto the print-outs and points falling within each area of interest were tallied and recorded. Reference areas for each section (e.g., tissue area) and total tissue volume were estimated in the same manner. Point tallies were converted into volume estimates using the formula: volume=T a/p·11Ei-1Pi, where T equals the slice spacing, a/p equals the calculated area per point and 11Ei-1Pi equals the sum of the points sampled. Areas per section for each region were calculated using the same formula with omission of the T multiplier.
Statistical Analyses
All data were collected and analyzed without knowledge of group identities. All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.). Group means for most analyses were compared using student's t-test or ANOVA with Tukey's post-test. Two-way ANOVA with or without repeated measures and with Bonferroni's post-tests were used to compare data sets containing two factors (e.g., behavior and time, or area and distance). Significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: B Lymphocytes Impair Spontaneous Recovery of Locomotor Function After SCI
Mice with and without B cells received a SCI and locomotor recovery was evaluated for up to 9 weeks (
Locomotor function was analyzed using BMS (
Results: Spinal Cord Pathology is Reduced in Mice Lacking B Cells
The lesion pathology caused by spinal cord contusion is characterized by a centralized core region with complete cell loss (frank lesion) and surrounding areas extending rostral and caudal to the impact site. Thus, unbiased stereology was used to quantify the volume of lesioned spinal cord at 9 weeks post-injury. In BCKO mice, lesion volume was decreased greater than 30% relative to SCI WT mice (
As shown in
Results: Antibody-Secreting B Cells (Plasma Cells) and Antibodies Accumulate in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Injured Spinal Cord
In SCI individuals, high levels of antibodies are found in CSF; however, the functional significance of these changes is unclear
The inventors show for the first time herein that like human SCI, immunoglobulins (total IgM and IgG) are present in CSF of SCI WT mice but not in BCKO mice (
Levels of circulating (serum) IgM and IgG antibodies are increased in chronic SCI mice (see
As shown in
In
In
As shown in
Results: SCI-Induced Antibodies Cause Behavioral Deficits in Naïve Mice
Sera from SCI WT but not SCI BCKO or uninjured mice causes neuroinflammation and neuron death when microinjected into intact CNS. Antibodies, cytokines or other blood-derived factors produced after SCI may cause these changes. Since high levels of antibodies exist in the circulation and CSF after SCI, the inventors tested whether these byproducts of B cell activation could directly cause the pathology described previously.
Antibodies were purified from blood of control or SCI mice.
Purified antibodies were microinjected into the spinal cord of naïve mice at a concentration of ˜0.6 μg/μl, which is ˜ 1/10th the concentration of IgG in normal blood. Overground locomotor function was monitored in all mice for up to 7 days. Mice microinjected with antibodies from control mice (n=9) had no obvious gait deficits at any time post-injection (
Unilateral intraspinal microinjection of antibodies purified from SCI mice causes hindlimb paralysis and neuropathology.
Results: SCI-Induced Antibodies are Neurotoxic—Anatomical Analyses
No visible pathology was present in spinal cords injected with control antibodies (
Results: SCI-Igs Cause Neuropathology via Complement- and FcR-Dependent Mechanisms
When antibodies bind antigen they form immune complexes (ICs) that cause tissue injury through activation of complement or recruitment/activation of cells bearing receptors for IgG, the Fc receptors. To determine if these mechanism(s) contribute to the pathology and loss of function caused by SCI antibodies, control or SCI antibodies were injected into the intact spinal cord of mice deficient in complement component C3 (C3−/−) or the Fc receptor gamma chain (FcRγ−/−).
As before, SCI antibodies caused complete but transient paralysis when injected into WT mice (
The latter data show that the ICs formed after SCI may cause injury to target cells in part through activation of complement. To examine if intraspinal antibodies co-localize with complement near or on putative target cells after SCI, confocal microscopic analyses of injured WT spinal cords were completed. In WT mice (
SCI antibody-mediated neuropathology is complement and Fc-receptor dependent.
IgG and complement Clq co-localize in regions of pathology in spinal cord of WT mice. As shown in
(
While the invention has been described with reference to various and preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the essential scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof.
Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed herein contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims.
The publications and other materials used herein to illuminate the invention or provide additional details respecting the practice of the invention, are incorporated by reference herein, and for convenience are provided in the following bibliography.
Citation of the any of the documents recited herein is not intended as an admission that any of the foregoing is pertinent prior art. All statements as to the date or representation as to the contents of these documents is based on the information available to the applicant and does not constitute any admission as to the correctness of the dates or contents of these documents.
This is a national stage application filed under 37 CFR 1.371 of international application PCT/US______ filed ______ which claims the priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/365,057 filed Jul. 16, 2010, the entire disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under Grant number NIH R01 NSO47175 and NIH R03 NS055871. The government has certain rights in this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US11/44192 | 7/15/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/29/2013 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61365057 | Jul 2010 | US |