1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an infant pacifier that simulates the natural shape, structure and consistency of a human breast in use such that when an infant is latched onto the areola area behind the nipple the infant's lips are flanged out and the nipple makes proper contact with the hard palate.
2. Brief Description of the Prior Art
The benefits of breast feeding for an infant and for a mother are well established. It is difficult, however, for a mother to necessarily be available to satisfy all the non-nutritive sucking needs of her baby. For example, some women do at times suffer from the discomfort of having cracked and bleeding nipples. Also, for all nursing mothers, and particularly working nursing mothers, it would be highly desirable to have a pacifier that accurately simulated her breast for non-nutritive sucking while the infant and mother are separated.
Currently available pacifiers however do not satisfy the above goal. With a common pacifier, the nipple collapses under the pressure from the infant's mouth and the infant cannot bring the nipple back into its mouth and onto the soft palate. The oral motor skills that an infant uses during breast feeding are different. In nursing, the nipple is in contact with the baby's palate while the baby's tongue exerts a force on a second portion of the nipple.
It is not unusual for a baby to reject the currently available pacifiers because the infant is only familiar with the physical movements necessary for nutritive sucking. On the other hand, once a baby has accepted a pacifier, the baby may reject the mother's breasts. A nursing mother is thus presented with a dilemma yet needs relief from the non-nutritive sucking needs of her offspring.
In view of the above, it is an object of the present invention to provide an infant pacifier that in use simulates the sucking action in nutritive feeding from a human breast. It is another object to provide a pacifier that when an infant is latched onto the areola area behind the nipple the infant's lips are flanged out and the nipple makes contact with the hard palate. It is also an object to provide a pacifier that is less likely to be rejected by a nursing baby and which is less likely to result in nipple confusion leading to breast rejection. Other objects and features of the invention will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
In accordance with the invention, an infant pacifier simulating the shape, structure and consistency of a human breast includes a teat portion including a nipple and areola attached to a mouth shield portion, said teat portion formed of a plastic material and having a length such that in use a distal end bears against the hard palate of a baby. Other features of the infant pacifier are disclosed below.
The invention summarized above comprises the constructions hereinafter described, the scope of the invention being indicated by the subjoined claims.
In the accompanying drawings, in which an embodiment of the invention is illustrated, corresponding reference characters refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings in which:
The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the described embodiments or the application and uses of the described embodiments. As used herein, the word “exemplary” or “illustrative” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as “exemplary” or “illustrative” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. All of the implementations described below are exemplary implementations provided to enable persons skilled in the art to make or use the embodiments of the disclosure and are not intended t limit the scope of the disclosure, which is defined by the claims. For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “left,” “rear,” “right,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in Drawing A. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification, are simply exemplary embodiments of the inventive concepts defined in the appended claims. Hence, specific dimensions and other physical characteristics relating to the embodiments disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting, unless the claims expressly state otherwise.
Referring it drawings more particularly by reference character, a pacifier 10 in accordance with the present invention includes a teat portion 12 with a nipple 14 and an areola 16 for insertion into a baby's mouth and a mouth shield portion 18. Mouth shield portion 18 fits over the baby's face around the mouth and serves in use to limit the extent of insertion of teat portion 12 into the baby's mouth. Teat portion 12 has a length such that in use a distal end 20 as shown in
The overall goal of pacifier 10 is to mimic the functionality, texture, shape and dimensions of a mother's areola and nipple. Specific details of an exemplary embodiment are as follows:
The silicone used for nipple 14, areola 16 and mouth shield 18 is highly inert, does not react with most chemicals and may be molded. The polycarbonate used for base ring 36 has superior impact resistance (toughness), temperature resistance and high clarity. It can be injection molded, thermoformed or extruded. Base ring 36 is formed first and base portion 18 molded around it.
In the above description, numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of some embodiments, specific components, devices, methods, in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art that these specific details need not be employed, and should not be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure. In the development of any actual implementation, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints. Such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but is nevertheless a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill. Hence as various changes could be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2860639 | Hoover | Nov 1958 | A |
3022915 | Mullin | Feb 1962 | A |
4321927 | Lynch | Mar 1982 | A |
D295073 | Ford | Apr 1988 | S |
D300462 | English | Mar 1989 | S |
4950286 | Meussdoerffer | Aug 1990 | A |
5108686 | Griffin | Apr 1992 | A |
5300089 | Sassin | Apr 1994 | A |
5673806 | Busnel | Oct 1997 | A |
D391641 | Fields | Mar 1998 | S |
5759195 | Fields | Jun 1998 | A |
5954749 | Fields | Sep 1999 | A |
D439983 | Dealing | Apr 2001 | S |
6241110 | Hakim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6482225 | Bingham | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6736830 | Roust | May 2004 | B2 |
D504723 | Randolph | May 2005 | S |
D504724 | Randolph | May 2005 | S |
7789894 | Rohrig | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D691277 | McCarty | Oct 2013 | S |
8545537 | Murphy Matro | Oct 2013 | B2 |
D700344 | Jackson-Berry | Feb 2014 | S |
8646632 | Vischer | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9044379 | Sabree | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D734476 | Chaitanarit | Jul 2015 | S |
D748811 | Lee | Feb 2016 | S |
9439836 | Thomas | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9463143 | Oates, II | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9585815 | Tesini | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9662275 | Lee | May 2017 | B2 |
D794811 | Thomas | Aug 2017 | S |
20020026218 | Roust | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030029 | Hakim | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040059381 | Rohrig | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050216060 | McCarty | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217159 | Leung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036285 | Davis | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060201901 | Sabree et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080210655 | Rees | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090005811 | DuChesne | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090235927 | Krueger | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248073 | Kliegman | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100308002 | Vischer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054527 | Murphy Matro | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110218569 | Tesini | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140221917 | Oates, II | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20160074286 | Carter | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090454 | Kerns | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160293059 | Rigert | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170000694 | Lee | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170224590 | Lee | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170326037 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62182137 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15185779 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15657485 | US |