Bacillus cereus strain AS4-12

Abstract

A novel strain of Bacillus cereus, designated AS4-12, has been isolated from the environment. The strain AS4-12 is one of a number of B. cereus strains which are useful as biocontrol agents to combat fungal damping off disease in field crop plants, and strain AS4-12 has exhibited the best performance among a large number of natural isolates in fostering the emergence and growth of alfalfa plants under normal field conditions in the upper midwestern U.S.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is in the general field of bacteriology and relates, in particular, to a novel strain of bacteria useful as a biocontrol agent in field applications.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Significant research has been conducted in recent years on the use of biological agents to increase agricultural productivity and efficiency. Biological control based on the use of microorganisms to suppress plant pests or supplement plant growth offers an attractive alternative to chemical pesticides which are less favored than they have previously been because of concerns about human health and environmental quality. Several screening programs have been used before to isolate biological agents which are effective in the laboratory or in the field to combat pests or facilitate plant growth.

An example of a biological control agent into which significant scientific and economic development has occurred is the use of the Bacillus thuringiensis. It was recognized that B. thuringiensis strains produced toxic proteins which have the ability to specifically kill certain insects and that initial inquiry led to a significant research which has proceeded to identify a large number of B. thuringiensis strains having variations and target range in efficacy. In addition, research has been conducted on methods for stabilizing and applying such toxins, or strains harboring them, to a wide variety of field crop situations. It was also discovered that knowledge of B. thuringiensis strains was largely transferable to new strains since the toxins required for biological control and methods for preparing inocula for use in the field were generally similar among strains.

Previously it has been found that a specific strain of Bacillus cereus, which has been referred to both as UW85 and by its ATCC designation 53522 has biocontrol efficacy in many applications. The UW85 B. cereus strain was found to protect alfalfa seedlings from damping off caused by Phytophthora medicaginis, tobacco seedlings from Phytophthora nicotianae cucumber fruits from rot caused by Pythium aphanidermatum, and peanuts from Sclerotinia minor. UW85 is also described, by reference to its ATCC number in U.S. Pat. No. 4,877,738. It was later found that UW85 produced two antifungal compounds which contribute independently to its suppression of damping off fungi due to antifungal and antibacterial activity. The more potent of these compounds, a novel aminopolyol has been designated zwittermicin A while the second compound, not well characterized, has been provisionally designated antibiotic B.

"Biological control" is defined as pathogen suppression by the use of a second organism. Mechanisms of biological control are diverse. For example, certain enteric bacteria have been examined for their usefulness in biological control of root rot in alfalfa. It is believed that control is obtained by competition between the enteric bacteria and the fungi for space on the surface of the alfalfa roots. In contrast, a toxin produced by one species of bacteria may be used to control another species of bacteria that appears as a pathogen. Bacterially produced antibiotics are an example of such toxins. The toxin can be isolated from the species producing it and administered directly, as is the common procedure with penicillin, or the species itself may be administered under appropriate circumstances to produce the toxin in situ. Once identified, such toxins produced by soil-dwelling bacteria may have utility in diverse other areas as antifungal or antibiotic agents.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is summarized in that a novel Bacillus cereus strain, here designated AS4-12, ATCC No. 55609, has been isolated from the environment. Strain AS4-12 has been found to have increased efficacy in fostering the growth and establishment of alfalfa plants in the field environment of the upper mid-western United States.

The present invention is further characterized in that a method is described to foster the growth of alfalfa stands by the application of an inoculum including as its active agents a novel Bacillus cereus isolate designated AS4-12, ATCC No. 55609.

Other objects, advantages, and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following specification.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An original bacterial strain, isolated from soil, exerts biological control over species of fungi responsible for damping off and root rot in plants. The strain has been deposited in the American Type Culture Collection, given the designation ATCC 55609, and shall hereinafter be referred to either as Strain AS4-12 or ATCC 55609.

It is further anticipated that certain mutants of AS4-12 also provide biological control comparable to that provided by AS4-12. These bacterial strains may also be obtained in substantially pure cultures. A "substantially pure" culture shall be deemed a culture of a bacteria, containing no other bacterial species in quantities sufficient to interfere with replication of the culture or to be detectable by normal bacteriological techniques. In addition, it has been discovered that the biological control is exerted principally by means of one or more toxins produced by the bacterial strain.

Strain AS4-12 is one of a group of Bacillus cereus strains that are useful biocontrol agents due, at least in part, to the fact that they naturally synthesize antibiotic agents, notably an antibiotic which is the subject of a co-pending patent application. The antibiotic or toxin is found in supernatant fluid and other bacteria-free fluid and culture medium removed from a culture of AS4-12 or of its protecting mutants, has been found to be a "protecting toxin," as that term is defined below. This toxin has been so characterized as to be identifiable independent of its source in cultures of Bacillus cereus, and is known and by the coined term "zwittermicin A." Another fraction from the supernatant fluid from a culture of B. cereus ATCC 53522 has been found biologically active, having a zoolysin capability to zoospores of Phytophthra medicaginis (Pmm), but, as revealed below, this zoolysin active fraction does not have the antifungal activity of the antibiotic. Bacillus cereus antibiotic zwittermicin A has been found to be a highly water soluble molecule of about 396 daltons. The molecule is a zwitterion, that is it contains both acid and base groups, includes two amino groups, and is a poly-alcohol.

The method by which the biological control referred to in the preceding paragraph may be verified to exist is the "plant protection assay" detailed below. "Biological control" of fungi causing damping off and root rot shall be deemed to exist if, when an effective quantity of AS4-12, its mutants that exhibit biological control, the anti-fungal toxin produced by them, or any other compound or molecule is placed in the soil or other growing medium in the immediate vicinity of the plant to be protected, a statistically significant reduction in the symptoms of damping off or root rot occurs in the presence of one or more pathogens causing these diseases. An "effective quantity" to combat damping off and root rot shall be that quantity sufficient to result in such a visibly significant reduction of symptoms. Clearly, if no quantity of a bacteria or any toxin or other compound is an effective quantity as so defined, that bacteria, toxin, or compound is not capable of exerting biological control over the fungi causing damping off and root rot.

AS4-12 and those of its mutants capable of exerting such biological control shall sometimes be referred to collectively as "protecting" bacteria. Bacillus cereus antibiotic and other toxins capable of exerting such biological control shall sometimes be referred to as "protecting" compounds or toxins. Plants, including seeds, seedlings, and mature plants, treated with such an effective quantity of protecting bacteria, their toxins, or Bacillus cereus antibiotic shall be referred to as "protected" from root rot or damping off.

The following is a disclosure of the plant protection assay whereby a test material such as a bacteria, a toxin, or the like, may be tested for its ability to exert biological control over a fungus capable of causing the symptoms of damping off or root rot. The seed or seedling of the plant to be protected is planted in a planting medium in the presence of damping off or root rot causing fungi. The planting medium may be a damp soil containing such fungi, vermiculite in water with the fungi present either in the vermiculite and water or in or on the seed or seedling, an agar-based formulation, or any other planting medium in which the seed or seedling will grow and the fungi may freely develop. The bacteria, toxin, or other test material is placed at least in the immediate vicinity of the seed or seedling. Such placement shall be understood to be in the "immediate vicinity" of the seed or seedling if any soluble test material or any soluble exudate of a bacteria being tested will be in actual contact with the germinating seedling.

Preferably, if seed is used, the seed is coated with the test material, and when the test material is so used with respect to a seed, it shall be referred to hereinafter as a "seed inoculum." The process of coating seed with a seed inoculum is generally well known to those skilled in the art, and any conventional method that does not require conditions sufficiently harsh to kill bacteria, to harm the seeds, or to destroy toxins or other materials included in the seed inoculum, is adequate. An easy and preferred method is to suspend or dissolve the test material in a 1.5% aqueous solution of methyl cellulose. For convenience, it will be presumed hereinafter that the seed inoculum is a bacteria suspended in the methyl cellulose, although a dissolvable material such as a bacterial toxin may be handled in the same manner or in a different manner to the same effect. The plant seed to be protected is added to the suspension and is mixed vigorously with it to coat the surface of the seed with the suspension. The seed may then be dried, preferably by being placed within a laminar flow hood on a sterile surface such as a sterile petri plate. The result is a dry, seed inoculum-coated seed. When the coated seed is planted in the planting medium, the test material accompanies it to reside in the immediate vicinity of the seed.

After a time sufficient for seedling growth and the expression of the symptoms of damping off, seedlings developing from the planted seed may be evaluated for visual evidence of protection, when compared to controls. In strains of alfalfa, soybeans, and snap beans known to be vulnerable to damping off, one to two weeks of growing time in a growth chamber at 24.degree. C. with a 12 hour photoperiod was found o be a period sufficient for the expression of symptoms of damping off when seedlings were being grown in test tubes containing roughly 10.sup.3 zoospores of Pmm or comparable, damping off-causing fungi. Protected seeds developed into seedlings visually indistinguishable from uninfected seeds while control seedlings developing from unprotected seeds were killed or, in the case of snap beans, exhibited brown lesions on roots and stems, stunted roots, rotted roots, and other visually apparent symptoms of root rot.

Protecting mutants of AS4-12 include both naturally occurring and artificially induced mutants. For example, AS4-12 is generally sensitive to the antibiotics rifampicin and neomycin. However, it is expected that naturally occurring mutants of AS4-12 can be isolated that exhibited resistance to one or the other of these antibiotics. Certain of these mutants, as well as one naturally occurring mutant distinguishable from the parent AS4-12 strain by the appearance of its colonies, will be found to protect alfalfa plants in the plant protection assay. Other mutants of AS4-12 can be artificially induced by subjecting AS4-12 to the mutagen N-methyl-nitrogoguanidine in conventional ways. Similar mutants have been made from other useful B. cereus strains, such as UW85 (ATCC 53522), as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,877,738, the disclosure which is hereby incorporated by reference.

In terms of conventional bacteriological morphology and colony analysis techniques, strain AS4-12, ATCC 55609, is indistinguishable from UW85, ATCC 53522. The differences between the strains largely relate to the statistical difference in actual field performance conditions, as reported below. In essence, strain AS4-12 provides a statistically significant higher level of pathogen suppression than does UW85.

EXAMPLE 1

Origin of Strains

The geographic origins, and physical and chemical characteristics of the soil samples used in this study are listed in Table 1. All samples were taken from the surface horizon. Measurements of soil pH, organic matter, and the particle size were made by the University of Wisconsin Soil & Plant Analysis Laboratory (Madison, Wis.).

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Characteristics of soils used in this study % Sand, Silt, Most recentSoil/Site Country pH % Organic.sup.a Clay.sup.b vegetation__________________________________________________________________________Lutz Panama nd.sup.c 5.5 nd ForestSnyder-Molino Panama nd 6.2 nd ForestBarbour-Lathrop Panama nd 7.1 nd ForestMoroceli Honduras nd 1.7 nd Maize-BeansSan Matias Honduras 5.8 1.5 nd Maize-BeansLaVega1 Honduras 6.3 2.3 nd BeansLaVega5 Honduras 5.9 2.5 nd Sorghum-MaizeArlington WI USA 6.9 4.2 23, 68, 9 AlfalfaHancock WI USA 6.6 0.8 87, 8, 5 Alfalfa-OatsMarshfield WI USA 6.5 3.1 23, 72, 5 AlfalfaLancaster WI USA 7.1 2.3 19, 68, 13 AlfalfaMadison WI USA 7.0 3.2 27, 56, 17 AlfalfaTaos NM USA 8.1 4.3 nd PastureTifton GA USA 6.3 1.0 87, 12, 1 TobaccoDouglas Gully Australia 6.1 2.2 nd VineyardLelystad Netherlands 7.5 1.8 51, 36, 13 Potatoes__________________________________________________________________________

Isolation and identification of B. cereus isolates

The bacterial strains and isolates and their origins are listed in Table 2. Bacteria collected from soybean roots were isolated as previously described from plants grown in a field plot in Madison, Wis. (Table 2). The 10 remaining bacteria collected in this study were isolated by placing either an entire alfalfa root or 1 g of soil in a test tube containing 9 ml water and sonicating it for 30 sec. in a Model 2200 bath sonicator (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, Conn.), Serial 10-fold dilutions of the suspensions were made in water, and 0.1 ml from dilutions ranging from 10.sup.-1 to 10.sup.-5 were spread on either 1/10 strength trypticase soy agar (1/10-strength TSA) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville Md.) or MinIC media. Plates were incubated at room temperature or 28.degree. C. for one to three days. The plates containing isolated colonies were used for further study. Colonies that had the morphology typical of B. cereus (flat, broad, and cream colored) were picked and streaked for isolated colonies. As a partial selection for B. cereus, during either the initial plating or subsequent streak plating, the medium was supplemented with polymyxin (25 .mu.g/ml), cycloheximide (100 .mu.g/ml), and ampicillin (50 .mu.g/ml). All isolates were tested for hemolysis of blood agar, which is diagnostic of B. cereus, and those that were non-hemolytic were removed from the collection. Blood agar was obtained from the Wisconsin State Hygiene Lab, Madison, Wis. Isolates were stored on 1/2-strength trypticase soy agar (1/2-strength TSA) slants. Alfalfa plants were grown from seed in soil from Arlington Wis. for 21 days in a growth chamber at 24.degree. C. with a 12 hour photoperiod and a light intensity of 244 microeinsteins/m.sup.2/ s. Soybean plants were grown from seed in a field plot in Madison Wis.

TABLE 2______________________________________Strains and isolates used in this studyStrain(s)/Isolates Origin______________________________________ATCC7064,ATCC27877,ATCC12826 American Type Culture CollectionBGSC6A3,BGSC6E1, Bacillus GeneticBGSC6E2,BGSC4A9, Stock CenterBGSC4B1,BGSC4C3,HD1,BGSC4E1,BGSC4F1,BGSC4G1,BGSC4H1,BGSC4I1,BGSC4J1,BGSC4S2T U.W.Bacteriology Dept. CollectionUW85 Alfalfa root, Arlington, WI (26)Soy130 Soybean root, Walnut St. Farm, Madison, WIALF1,ALF9,ALF10, Roots of alfalfaALF13,ALF19,ALF23, plants plantedALF52,ALF53,ALF79, in soil fromALF83,ALF85,ALF94, Arlington, WI andALF95,ALF98,ALF99, grown in growthALF108,ALF109, chamberALF115,ALF117,ALF133,ALF137,ALF144,ALF154,ALF157,ALF161,ALF166,ALF167,ALF173LUTZ21,LUTZ58,LUTZ128 Lutz soilSNY14,SNY42,SNY44,SNY45,SNY73 Snyder-Molino soilBAR78,BAR145,BAR177 Barbour-Lathrop soilMOR1,MOR28,MOR37 Moroceli soilSM32,SM43,SM44 San Matias soilVGA19,VGA118,VGA137 LaVega1 soilVGA562,VGA577,VGA598 LaVega5 soilAS7-4,AS8-4,AG8-13,AS4-12,ARL8 Arlington soilHS1-3,HS23-11,HS24-8,HS24-9 Hancock soilMS1-9,MS3-2,MS8-2 Mansfield soilLS2-2,LS2-12,LS33-2 Lancaster soilWS4-12,WS8-8,WS10-15,WS16-4,WS22-12 Madison soilTNM68,TNM155,TNM243 Taos soilTG38,TG42,TG126 Tifton soilDGA34,DGA37,DGA84,DGA94 Douglas Gully soilLN24,LN75,LN100 Lelystad soil______________________________________

Based on the profiles of fatty acids from 47 isolates analyzed by five Star Labs (Branford Conn.) and Microbial ID (Newark Del.), all of the isolates were classified as members of the B. cereus group, which includes the species B. mycoides, B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis. The unique rhizoidal morphology of B. mycoides strains differentiates them from B. cereus, and none of the isolates in this collection display B. mycoides-like morphology. B. anthracis is not hemolytic and is usually sensitive to ampicillin and therefore was probably excluded from this collection. Differentiation between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis is difficult with standard methods. Therefore we have followed current recommendations and considered all isolates gathered in this study as B. cereus. Strains BGSC4A9, BGSC4B1, BGSC4C3, HD1, BGSC4E1, BGSC4F1, BGSC4G1, BGSC4H1, BTSC4I1, BGSC4J1 and BGSC4S2 were previously classified by others as B. thuringiensis, and that species designation was retained for those strains.

Assay for sensitivity to phage P7

The phages P7 (ATCC75237) and PB were used to help characterize the strains. The susceptibility of B. cereus strains to infection by phage P7 has proven to have a strong co-relation to biocontrol utility and antibiotic production. To propagate these phages, we spread a mixture of melted soft agar (4 g agar/1) with approximately 10.sup.6 PFU of phage and an excess of B. cereus strain UW85 on 1/2-strength TSA plates. Plates were incubated overnight at 28.degree. C. and then the soft agar was scraped off the plates and suspended in 1/2-strength trypticase soy broth (1/2-strength TSB), (1 ml/plate). Agar and cells were removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant solution was passed through a 0.2 .mu.m filter. Phage titers were typically 1.times.10.sup.10 PFU/ml.

To screen large numbers of isolates for P7 sensitivity, grids of 48 isolates were grown on 1/10-strength TSA and then cells were transferred with a metal replicator onto 1/10-strength TSA plates that had been spread with dilutions of P7 such that they contained approximately 10.sup.8, 10.sup.4, and 10.sup.3 PFU/plate. A 1/10-strength TSA plate containing no phage was used as a control. Isolates that appeared to form patches with decreased growth or plaques on plates containing P7 were tested in the soft-agar overlay assay (described below) to determine if they were P7.sup.s. Most isolates that were P7.sup.r in the primary screen were not re-tested.

In the second test for sensitivity of bacterial isolates to P7, each isolate was grown on 1/2-strength TSA and cells were scraped off plates and mixed in soft agar overlays to form lawns on fresh 1/2-strength TSA plates. Ten-fold dilutions of P7 were placed in 5-.mu.l drops on the plates, which were then incubated at 28.degree. C. If plaques appeared, the strain was designated P7-sensitive (P7.sup.s). Lawns of two isolates, ARL8 and HS23-11, were cleared by undiluted drops of P7, but P7 did not form isolated plaques on these isolates at lower concentrations. The clearing due to high titer drops appeared to be due to P7 rather than a chemical present in UW85 lysates, since high titer drops of lysates of PB, which produces turbid plaques on UW85, did not cause clearing on lawns of ARL8 and HS23-11. Therefore these strains were also scored P7.sup.s. Isolates whose lawns appeared unaffected by P7 were scored P7.sup.r.

Assay for inhibition of Erwinia herbicola

Inhibition of E. herbicola LS005 was assayed as described in Silo-Suh et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60:2023-2030 (1994), with the following modifications. Three-day-old cultures of each B. cereus isolate grown in 1/2-strength TSB were tested to determine whether they inhibited E. herbicola on 1/1000-strength TSA plates. Isolates that produced visible zones of inhibition of E. herbicola were tested again. Isolates that produced visible zones of inhibition in both tests were scored Eh.sup.+. Isolates that did not noticeably inhibit E. herbicola in each of two initial tests were scored Eh.sup.-. Some B. cereus isolates did not inhibit E. herbicola during initial testing but did after storage at -20.degree. C., and certain isolates (ALF115,HD1 and BGSC4S2) had variable phenotypes producing either small zones of inhibition or no zone in subsequent tests; these were classified Eh.sup.-.

Assay for zwittermicin A and antibiotic B

Zwittermicin A and antibiotic B were identified in culture supernatants by cation exchange chromatography using CM SEP-PAK cartridges (Millipore, Millford, Mass.) followed by high voltage paper electrophoresis (HVPE). The cation fraction from the equivalent of 4 ml of culture supernatant was applied to the paper, which was stained with silver nitrate after electrophoresis, described in Silo-Suh et al. supra. Isolates that produced material indistinguishable from either authentic zwittermicin A or authentic antibiotic B in HVPE were designated zwittermicin A producers or antibiotic B producers, respectively. To verify the structural identity of zwittermicin A produced by nine representatives of the collection of isolates, putative-zwittermicin A was purified from these isolates, and subjected to proton nuclear magnetic resonance Spectroscopy (.sup.1 H-NMR) and fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry.

Assay for suppression of alfalfa damping-off

Bacterial isolates were grown for three days in 1/2-strength TSB and tested in an assay for damping-off. Each isolate was tested on fifteen plants in each of 7 separate experiments with the following exceptions: strain ATCC12826 was omitted from experiments 1 and 2; strain BAR78 was omitted from experiment 4; and strains WXS8-8 and LS2-12 were omitted from experiment 5. Statistical analyses (analysis of variance, Dunnet's comparison test, standard error of least squared mean) were conducted using the SAS Computer Program (SAS Institute, Raleigh, N.C.). The data from the seven experiments were pooled and analyzed as a single experiment with seven blocks.

Testing diversity of strains

To estimate the diversity of zwittermicin A and antibiotic B-producers, we sought to determine the minimum number of unique zwittermicin A and/or antibiotic B-producing strains in our collection. We considered isolates to be distinct strains only if phenotypic differences between them could be shown. Therefore, isolates were subjected to a series of phenotypic tests. All characterization was performed on isolates that had been colony purified on 1/2-strength TSA. To test for antibiotic resistance, isolates were streaked on 1/2-strength TSA containing tetracycline (5 .mu.g/ml), neomycin (5 .mu.g/ml), or chloramphenicol (1 .mu.g/ml), and incubated at 28.degree. C. overnight. Isolates that grew similarly when streaked in the presence or absence of antibiotic were classified as antibiotic resistant. to test isolates for pigment production, they were grown on MES minimal medium at 28.degree. C. for seven days and then scored visually. MES minimal medium contained 9.76 g/L 2-[N-morpholine] ethansulfonic acid (MES), 2 g/L (NH.sub.4).sub.2 SO.sub.4, 0.2 g/L MgSO.sub.4 .multidot.7 H.sub.2 O, 0.25mg/L MnSO.sub.4 .multidot.7 H.sub.2 O, 1.25 g/L K.sub.2 HPO.sub.4 .multidot.3H.sub.2 O, 2 g/L L-glutamic acid, 10 mg/L thiamine, 15 g/L agar, 40 mg/L FeCl.sub.3 .multidot.6H.sub.2 O, 6 g/L sucrose and 1 mM of the amino acids threonine, serine, leucine, valine, and alanine, and was adjusted to pH 6.1. MES-Thr medium was MES minimal medium lacking threonine. We characterized the ability of isolates to grow on MES-Thr media by streaking isolates onto MES-Thr plates and incubating at 28.degree. C. for four days and recording the rate of appearance of colonies for each strain. Phages .PHI.ATCC 7064 and ATCC 27877 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and were propagated on bacterial strains ATCC 7064 and ATCC 27877, respectively. Phage .PHI.63 was propagated on strain Bt-1, and both .PHI.63 and Bt-1 were obtained from R. Landen. Sensitivity of isolates to phages .PHI.63, .PHI.ATCC7064 and .PHI.ATCC27877 was determined by the soft-agar overlay method described above for P7, with plaque formation as the indicator of sensitivity.

Association of zwittermicin A production with P7.sup.s and Eh.sup.+ isolates

It was known that B. cereus strain UW85 produces two antibiotics, the novel aminopolyol, zwittermicin A, and antibiotic B, that contribute to the suppression of alfalfa seedling damping-off. UW85 was originally identified in a labor-intensive screen for biological control activity. The study conducted above was intended to investigate whether sensitivity to P7 (P7.sup.s) and the ability to inhibit E. herbicola (Eh.sup.+) were phenotypes that could be used to identify zwittermicin A producers and useful biocontrol strains.

4,307 B. cereus and B. thuringiensis isolates were screened for P7.sup.s and/or Eh.sup.+ phenotypes. The isolates were obtained from geographically diverse soil samples collected at a total of 16 locations in five countries (Table 1 above), from alfalfa and soybean roots, and from stock culture collections (Table 2 above). the number of P7.sup.s or P7.sup.r Eh.sup.+ isolates identified from each source and the number of isolates tested were tabulated. P7.sup.s isolates were identified in samples from 14 of the 16 soils examined as well as from alfalfa and soybean roots. Of the 87 P7.sup.s isolates, all were Eh.sup.+ except SNY73 and LN100. P7.sup.r Eh.sup.+ isolates were identified from each of the soils as well as from alfalfa roots. Among all the isolates tested, approximately 2% (85/4,307) of the isolates examined were P7.sup.s Eh.sup.+ and 7% (132/1,876) were P7.sup.r Eh.sup.+.

Alfalfa field stand studies

Several of the most promising strains were then used as biocontrol inocula in alfalfa fields grown in Arlington, Hancock, Marshfield and West Madison, Wis. The results of those field trials are set forth in Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6 below.

From that data, it was determined that strain AS4-12 had, overall, the best field performance in enhancing the stand of alfalfa fields under normal cultivation conditions in the upper midwestern U.S.

TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Biocontrol by Bacillus cereus strains on alfalfa at Arlington, WIEmergence counts.sup.a Forage yield.sup.b Stand 07 DAP.sup.d 14 DAP 21 DAP 28 DAP Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest count.sup.cTreatment 5-26-93 6-02-93 6-09-93 6-16-93 7-29-93 9-16-93 6-03-94 7-18-94 8-02-94__________________________________________________________________________Untreated 35.8 61.8 52.2 44.8 182.8 281.4 985.4 465.0 28.2Apron 39.2 56.4 46.2 42.4 260.6 346.2 962.0 470.8 25.6UW85 41.4 65.0 51.2 44.2 232.2 366.6 1117.2 460.0 29.0AP 17-5 48.6 71.6 61.8 54.2 237.2 324.6 934.0 466.4 --AP 2-1 36.6 58.6 44.6 39.0 206.0 300.8 920.4 459.4 --AS 4-12 55.0 89.4 73.6 56.8 154.4 303.4 1005.0 443.8 34.2AS 23-15 32.6 58.4 43.8 38.6 241.4 323.8 1057.8 453.8 --HP 20-2 32.6 53.4 36.0 33.8 208.8 302.2 1140.6 480.2 --HP 24-2 43.4 75.4 68.8 59.2 305.4 330.2 967.6 462.0 --HS 1-3 42.2 59.8 48.2 42.0 239.6 337.0 1007.8 481.4 --HS 18-4 36.2 65.6 47.2 48.6 220.6 296.4 1070.6 427.6 --LP 34-16 40.4 65.2 51.2 43.8 310.8 354.0 1022.0 448.2 --LP 38-2 38.2 64.0 49.2 42.8 348.8 433.6 1011.6 504.8 --LP 4-13 40.8 63.2 46.8 45.8 285.4 367.8 1091.4 447.2 --LP 15-3 32.2 59.8 50.2 39.2 228.0 381.8 1201.0 480.2 --MS 1-9 37.2 60.8 45.0 39.6 274.4 379.0 1105.4 442.4 --MS 19-4 26.8 52.4 44.4 37.0 280.6 316.8 938.6 500.4 --WP 27-3 42.2 63.0 52.6 43.0 260.4 324.6 957.6 387.8 --WP 36-16 42.2 63.2 52.6 43.0 204.4 297.6 804.4 345.4 --WS 12-3 48.2 74.6 61.8 52.6 246.2 303.8 1073.6 483.4 --WS 12-4 46.0 67.8 52.8 40.6 255.6 373.0 1066.0 440.8 --Pr> F 0.0415 0.0019 0.0005 0.0436 0.9441 0.9719 0.7041 0.7891 0.2299LSD (0.05) 13.7 14.7 14.6 13.9 174.1 174.1 281.3 118.6 8.6C.V. 27.3 18.2 22.6 25.0 56.0 36.9 21.9 20.7 21.4__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Emergence counts: number of seedlings per 1 m row .sup.b Forage yield: forage fresh weight per 1 m row .sup.c Stand count: number of plants per 1 m row .sup.d DAP = days after planting Field number: 248 Soil type: Plano silt loam Experimental design: Randomized Complete Block with 5 replications Cultivar: Iroquois Planting date: 509-93 Planting rate: 20 lbs per acre (assuming 6 inch rows) Fungicide rate: 4 oz per 100 lbs seed Bacteria rate: 12 fluid oz per 60 lbs seed (10.sup.8 cells per ml of culture) TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Biocontrol by Bacillus cereus strains on alfalfa at Hancock, WIEmergence counts.sup.a Forage yield.sup.b Stand 07 DAP.sup.d 14 DAP 21 DAP 28 DAP Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest count.sup.cTreatment 6-02-93 6-09-93 6-16-93 6-23-93 8-05-93 9-23-93 6-06-94 7-22-94 8-04-94__________________________________________________________________________Untreated 53.6 57.4 45.6 41.4 68.0 151.4 671.2 478.6 39.2Apron 75.4 77.2 59.4 59.2 61.6 137.0 596.2 431.8 52.8UW85 55.6 64.0 50.6 48.2 79.8 169.8 762.4 530.6 45.4AP 17-5 44.0 44.0 37.2 33.8 51.4 153.2 642.0 478.2 --AP 2-1 45.0 42.8 40.4 37.8 52.8 159.8 624.0 368.4 --AS 4-12 92.6 81.2 73.0 64.8 71.0 154.2 634.8 449.6 55.8AS 23-15 54.0 47.0 46.0 40.8 61.6 178.0 735.0 481.8 --HP 20-2 45.2 40.4 37.0 34.0 51.8 129.4 679.2 438.2 --HP 24-2 53.4 54.2 46.6 43.0 58.0 155.2 717.2 551.4 --HS 1-3 53.2 47.2 41.2 36.8 60.4 147.6 667.2 431.4 --HS 18-4 57.2 61.6 50.6 47.2 76.0 160.8 653.8 453.2 --LP 34-16 55.6 55.0 53.0 46.0 70.2 152.2 652.8 426.6 --LP 38-2 50.6 51.6 43.8 39.0 46.8 118.8 600.8 422.6 --LP 4-13 63.6 57.0 55.2 51.0 73.6 160.6 684.0 405.4 --LP 15-3 52.8 52.2 44.0 42.2 66.8 166.2 654.4 453.2 --MS 1-9 61.0 53.0 52.0 47.8 74.2 153.2 703.4 475.4 --MS 19-4 47.4 53.6 45.0 43.0 61.6 140.0 649.0 507.8 --WP 27-3 45.0 49.2 45.6 42.4 67.0 145.4 669.2 469.6 --WP 36-16 60.2 55.4 49.8 44.6 61.2 154.8 650.8 462.6 --WS 12 3 58.4 51.2 48.4 45.0 61.8 163.6 643.8 475.4 --WS 12-4 55.6 50.6 46.4 40.2 46.8 128.0 590.0 392.6 --Pr> F 0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 0.0003 0.0231 0.6947 0.7181 0.2460 0.0155LSD (0.05) 13.0 16.2 13.3 12.3 19.3 45.2 137.6 109.8 10.1C.V. 18.3 23.5 21.9 22.1 24.4 23.7 16.5 19.1 15.2__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Emergence counts: number of seedlings per 1 m row .sup.b Forage yield: forage fresh weight per 1 m row .sup.c Stand count: number of plants per 1 m row .sup.d DAP = days after planting Field number: V21 Soil type: Plainfield loamy sand Experimental design: Randomized Complete Block with 5 replications Cultivar: Iroquois Planting date: 526-93 Planting rate: 20 lbs per acre (assuming 6 inch rows) Fungicide rate: 4 oz per 100 lbs seed Bacteria rate: 12 fluid oz per 60 lbs seed (10.sup.8 cells per ml of culture) TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Biocontrol by Bacillus cereus strains on alfalfa at Marshfield, WIEmergence counts.sup.a Forage yield.sup.b Stand 07 DAP.sup.d 14 DAP 21 DAP 28 DAP Harvest Harvest Harvest count.sup.cTreatment 7-06-93 7-13-93 7-20-93 7-27-93 8-25-93 Harvest 6-07-94 7-21-94 8-03-94__________________________________________________________________________Untreated 32.0 28.2 26.4 28.8 191.0 -- 731.4 525.8 27.8Apron 78.2 66.2 64.2 60.2 260.8 -- 826.4 631.8 52.6UW85 41.2 32.4 33.2 33.6 235.8 -- 919.0 557.0 33.6AP 17-5 35.4 28.8 27.6 29.6 211.4 -- 785.6 580.0 --AP 2-1 33.4 29.8 29.2 30.0 221.2 -- 872.2 597.8 --AS 4-12 70.8 65.2 62.2 58.4 288.2 -- 974.4 677.6 54.0AS 23-15 36.0 31.0 30.2 28.4 217.8 -- 847.4 451.8 --HP 20-2 36.6 31.4 31.2 32.2 219.2 -- 843.4 540.2 --HP 24-2 28.2 24.8 23.0 24.8 215.2 -- 816.8 550.2 --HS 1-3 45.8 38.4 36.6 36.6 222.8 -- 825.2 556.0 --HS 18-4 40.8 34.4 29.0 32.4 212.2 -- 880.0 582.6 --LP 34-16 36.8 36.6 34.6 33.0 246.2 -- 883.8 577.0 --LP 38-2 36.8 34.8 34.2 33.8 229.0 -- 840.6 525.0 --LP 4-13 36.0 30.0 28.8 29.4 218.0 -- 775.0 533.0 --LP 15-3 36.2 31.2 27.2 30.6 202.6 -- 810.0 550.8 --MS 1-9 42.0 37.8 36.6 36.2 250.2 -- 948.8 602.4 --MS 19-4 36.4 34.4 33.4 33.6 233.0 -- 828.6 553.0 --WP 27-3 30.4 26.4 24.6 26.8 218.8 -- 727.4 562.4 --WP 36-16 35.4 33.0 30.4 30.2 226.2 -- 837.2 569.2 --WS 12-3 29.2 23.0 23.8 23.0 186.2 -- 780.0 478.0 --WS 12-4 39.6 35.0 36.4 33.2 227.0 -- 831.8 520.8 --Pr> F 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.4338 -- 0.2815 0.0642 0.0001LSD (0.05) 11.5 10.5 10.8 9.9 63.0 -- 160.8 106.9 8.2C.V. 23.0 23.8 25.7 23.4 22.2 -- 15.3 15.2 14.2__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Emergence counts: number of seedlings per 1 m row .sup.b Forage yield: forage fresh weight per 1 m row .sup.c Stand count: number of plants per 1 m row .sup.d DAP = days after planting Field number: W9 Soil type: Withee silt loam Experimental design: Randomized Complete Block with 5 replications Cultivar: Iroquois Planting date: 629-93 Planting rate: 20 lbs per acre (assuming 6 inch rows) Fungicide rate: 4 oz per 100 lbs seed Bacteria rate: 12 fluid oz per 60 lbs seed (10.sup.8 cells per ml of culture) TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Biocontrol by Bacillus cereus strains on alfalfa at West Madison, WIEmergence counts.sup.a Forage yield.sup.b Stand 07 DAP.sup.d 14 DAP 21 DAP 28 DAP Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest count.sup.cTreatment 5-28-93 6-04-93 6-11-93 6-18-93 8-04-93 9-24-93 6-01-94 7-18-94 8-01-94__________________________________________________________________________Untreated 68.2 72.6 64.0 60.6 40.4 252.8 935.2 522.4 44.8Apron 80.0 86.6 63.0 69.2 24.2 156.0 868.2 440.0 44.6UW85 77.4 86.2 69.0 66.2 51.6 241.6 924.4 502.8 44.2AP 17-5 64.8 67.8 60.8 54.4 31.4 214.6 888.0 494.8 --AP 2-1 62.6 71.0 62.8 62.4 33.2 222.8 940.4 520.8 --AS 4-12 89.6 96.4 87.0 80.2 45.0 248.4 936.2 517.0 51.4AS 23-15 70.4 80.8 64.0 57.8 20.6 221.4 865.4 498.6 --HP 20-2 69.4 82.0 64.6 58.8 36.0 240.0 933.4 530.2 --HP 24-2 66.6 77.8 68.6 63.2 41.8 223.0 919.0 440.2 --HS 1-3 70.4 70.6 62.2 56.2 38.4 246.0 931.0 499.6 --HS 18-4 68.6 75.2 66.2 64.6 40.8 230.2 910.8 466.0 --LP 34-16 75.6 85.4 61.0 67.0 23.4 218.0 884.6 498.6 --LP 38-2 76.2 83.2 61.2 58.4 22.2 184.6 911.6 517.4 --LP 4-13 75.4 76.2 58.6 56.4 29.8 196.6 914.6 463.2 --LP 15-3 71.6 74.2 63.2 57.4 28.2 229.2 929.2 465.4 --MS 1-9 65.0 82.2 65.0 62.6 37.4 219.6 891.4 474.8 --MS 19-4 60.0 69.6 58.6 49.0 37.8 238.2 929.0 419.4 --WP 27-3 80.0 84.8 65.0 56.8 39.2 230.8 826.0 544.6 --WP 36-16 71.2 74.8 60.6 56.4 48.6 227.0 939.8 519.2 --WS 12-3 61.0 64.4 54.2 51.6 25.4 228.4 940.6 498.4 --WS 12-4 68.8 75.4 63.4 55.0 40.8 257.8 921.0 501.4 --Pr> F 0.0011 0.0231 0.3987 0.0470 0.2839 0.9080 0.6085 0.6016 0.4005LSD (0.05) 12.3 15.7 17.0 14.7 22.7 85.1 91.0 98.0 10.3C.V. 13.8 16.0 21.2 19.4 51.5 30.2 7.9 15.8 16.1__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Emergence counts: number of seedlings per 1 m row .sup.b Forage yield: forage fresh weight per 1 m row .sup.c Stand count: number of plants per 1 m row .sup.d DAP = days after planting Field number: P11 Soil type: Plano silt loam Experimental design: Randomized Complete Block with 5 replications Cultivar: Iroquois Planting date: 521-93 Planting rate: 20 lbs per acre (assuming 6 inch rows) Fungicide rate: 4 oz per 100 lbs seed Bacteria rate: 12 fluid oz per 60 lbs seed (10.sup.8 cells per ml of culture)

Claims

1. A biologically pure culture of Bacillus cereus which is AS4-12, ATCC 55609.

2. A biologically pure culture of a mutant strain of Bacillus cereus strain AS4-12, ATCC 55609 which retain the abilities to produce zwittermicin A and to protect alfalfa plants from damping off disease under field conditions.

3. An inoculum for application to alfalfa comprising a carrier and an effective quantity of a bacteria selected from the group consisting of Bacillus cereus AS4-12, ATCC 55609, mutants of Bacillus cereus AS4-12, ATCC 55609, which retain the capabilities to produce zwittermicin A and to protect alfalfa plants from damping off disease, and mixtures thereof.

4. A method for protecting plants in a growing medium from damping off disease comprising the steps of placing in the vicinity of the plant to be protected an effective quantity of a bacteria selected from the group consisting of Bacillus cereus AS4-12, ATCC 55609 and mutants thereof which retain the capabilities of producing zwittermicin A and protecting alfalfa plants from damping off disease.