The present invention relates to back constructions with flexible lumbar support, such as may be used not only for chairs and furniture seating, but also in vehicle and vessel seating (personal and mass-transit, including automobiles, trucks, buses, planes, trains, boats, etc.), stadium and auditorium seating, bench and multi-person seating, and other seating arrangements.
A comfortable and ergonomic back construction is disclosed in Battey et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,258 (hereafter the “Battey '258 patent”). The back construction in the Battey '258 patent includes a back shell pivoted to a back frame at top pivots and at forwardly-located bottom pivots, and includes a flexible lumbar section that combines with stiff thoracic and pelvic sections and the pivots to cause the back to flex along a well-defined predetermined path. A biasing mechanism biases the lumbar section forwardly for optimal support to a seated user. Notably, in the Battey '258 patent, the bottom pivots are located on flanges (134) that extend forward of a front surface of the back shell, in a position where they limit overall design options and potentially interfere with laterally sliding onto the seat from a side position. It is desirable in some environments and some seating applications to eliminate interference to lateral entry onto the seat caused by the forwardly-extending flanges. At the same time, it is desirable to maintain the ergonomic function and comfortableness of a flexible back shell construction similar to the one shown in the Battey '258 patent.
It has been discovered that back supports with very flexible lumbar regions can potentially have issues caused by “uncontrolled flexure”. Specifically, under extreme conditions, a highly flexible back support may bend in ways that do not represent human shapes, such as “S” shapes or non-arcuate “non-human-like” shapes. The reason this is important is because non-human-like shapes cause localized uncomfortable pressure in the back and/or lines of uncomfortably high pressures in the back. The original Leap® chair designs (e.g. see Battey U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,258, FIG. 12) attempted to solve this problem of bending to “non-human-like” shapes by providing forwardly-curved back shell material with first pivot points near the upper back and second pivot points forward of the lower pelvic (or belt) area. However, it is desirable to better control flexure of the back shell with fewer design constraints in regard to pivot locations, and while at the same time simplifying overall construction and design of a back shell and while reducing components and assembly time. It is also desirable to provide a back support design that is made of environmentally friendly materials, and made of easily recyclable components.
Heidmann U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,228 discloses a back arrangement where a flexible back shell is pivotally mounted at a top location and pivotally/slidably supported at a bottom location. However, testing has shown that better control over flexure of the back shell and better control over movement of and orientation of a lower edge of the back shell may be desired, while also requiring fewer design constraints in regard to pivot locations, and while at the same time simplifying overall construction and design of a back shell and while reducing components and assembly time.
Also, increased design flexibility is desired for both aesthetic and functional aspects, such as to allow relocation of or elimination of the top and/or bottom pivots, while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical assembly, while using environmentally-friendly parts that can be readily disassembled and recycled, and while still providing an open lateral access path into the seating area in front of the back.
Thus, a system having the aforementioned advantages and solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
In one aspect of the present invention, a back construction for a seating unit includes a back shell having a flexible lumbar region, where a vertical section through the lumbar region defines a first radius and where the lumbar region has a first resilient stiffness. The back construction further includes at least one vertically-extending elongated spring with a second resilient stiffness at least twice the first resilient stiffness. The elongated spring has an arcuate section coupled to and coextensive with the lumbar region. The lumbar region and the elongated spring form a combination that, when engaged with a point-focused load, flexes into different uniformly-curved shapes of increasing radii, with the spring acting to distribute forces across the lumbar region while continuously maintaining a uniform curvature in the lumbar region.
In a narrower form, the material of the back shell has a Young's modulus of less than about 170,000 psi, while the material of the spring has a Young's modulus of at least about 5,000,000 psi. Also, in another narrower form, the material of the back shell has a yield strength of less than about 3,550 psi, and wherein the material of the spring has a yield strength of at least about 80,000 psi.
In another aspect of the present invention, a back construction for a seating unit includes a back shell having a flexible lumbar region, where a vertical section through the lumbar region defines a first radius when in an unstressed state. The back construction further includes a vertically-extending elongated spring having an arcuate section coupled to and coextensive with the lumbar region, the spring defining a second radius when in an unstressed state. The lumbar region and the elongated spring form a third radius when coupled together. The lumbar region and the elongated spring form a combination that, when engaged with a point-focused load, flexes into different shapes, with the spring being pre-tensioned and acting to distribute forces across the lumbar region while continuously maintaining a desired supportive force.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a back construction for a seating unit includes a back shell having a flexible lumbar region and a vertically-extending elongated spring attached to the back shell and extending vertically across the lumbar region. The elongated spring is attached to the back shell by a releasable mechanical connection. The spring is coextensive with the lumbar region and forms a combination with the lumbar region that, when engaged with a point-focused load, flexes into different shapes, with the spring acting to distribute forces across the lumbar region.
In still another aspect of the present invention, a back construction for a seating unit includes a back frame and a back shell. The back shell includes a flexible lumbar region with edge strips extending vertically across the lumbar region and includes leaf springs attached to the back shell and supporting the edge strip to form a combination with the lumbar region that, when engaged with a point-focused load, flexes into different shapes, with the springs acting to distribute forces across the lumbar region. The back construction further includes a top connection connecting the back shell to the back frame, and bottom means located entirely rearward of a front surface of the back shell for supporting a lower edge of the back shell on the back frame for relative movement to the back frame when the lumbar region is flexed, with the leaf springs controlling a majority of the flexure of the lumbar region and the bottom means does not control a majority of the flexure.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
The present disclosure focuses on a seating unit 20 (
The illustrated seating unit 20 (
It is also contemplated that the present back construction can be used in combination with a variety of different back frames, seats, bases, and armrests. Several different back frames and bases are illustrated herein. However, it is contemplated that the back frame could be other configurations not specifically illustrated herein, such as a perimeter frame, or a spine frame. Also, different bases and seats can be used. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present inventive concepts are not intended to be limited to only the illustrated arrangements.
The back shell 22 (
The back shell 22 includes a stiff thoracic section 46 with two horizontally-spaced top pivots 47 defined along its upper edge, and also includes a stiff pelvic section 50. The top pivots 47 pivotally engage mating pivots near a top of the back frame 23 to form the top connections 24. The stiff thoracic section 46 and/or the pelvic section 50 can be reinforced if necessary for stability, with the braces being integral or add-on components to the back shell 22. A pair of leaf-spring-like edge strips 306 extend vertically along and across the lumbar section 26 and connect the thoracic and pelvic sections 46 and 50, and a plurality of flexible horizontal strips extend between the edge strips 306 in the lumbar section 26. A cushion may be used (but does not need to be used) on the back construction 21. As illustrated, a cushion is positioned on the back shell 22 which causes the front surface of the back 21 to be located forward of the front surface of the back shell 22 itself. It is noted that horizontal cross sections taken through the thoracic section 46, lumbar section 26 and the pelvic section 50 of the back shell 22 are forwardly concave in shape, and that a vertical cross section is forwardly protruding in the lumbar section 26.
The base 30 (
The back frame 23 (
The fact that a direct bottom connection is not required (see
As noted above, back shell 22 (
Leaf springs 309 are coupled to the edge strips 306 and extend vertically across the lumbar region 26, with their top end extending to a top location slightly above the top strap 307 and with their bottom end extending to a bottom location slightly below the bottom strap 307. The illustrated leaf springs 309 have a length sufficient to extend across the lumbar region, such as about 6-10 inches or more, and have a cross section that is rectangular, with a width that is an about a half inch to one inch. The width of the illustrated springs 309 is about 4 or more times its thickness so that it blends in well with the “thin aesthetics” and thin dimensions along an edge of the chair back construction. It is contemplated that springs having other cross sections (e.g., round or oval) can also be used. The ends of the illustrated leaf springs extend above and below the lumbar region at least about an inch or so and are relatively flat. The ends of the illustrated springs extend non-arcuately from the arcuate intermediate section of the leaf spring, while the center section of the springs extend arcuately across the lumbar region of the back shell coextensively with the lumbar region of the back shell. It is contemplated that the leaf springs 309 will be substantially higher in yield strength and flexural modulus and Young's modulus than the material of the back shell 302. For example, where a composite or polymeric-based leaf spring 309 is used, such as a fiberglass spring, it is preferred to have a yield strength of at least about 80,000 psi and a Young's modulus of about 5,000,000 psi. Also, an epoxy or other spring material could be used. Also, a metal spring material could be used such as spring steel. The spring material preferably should have an excellent memory, resist kinking, resist taking a set, and avoid creep. It is contemplated that the spring yield strength and Young's modulus will be at least double, or more preferably at least about ten times, or still more preferably about twenty times the yield strength and Young's modulus of the back shell material, depending on particular design criteria.
It is contemplated that the leaf springs 309 can be attached to the back shell 22 in a number of different ways. The illustrated back shell 22 (
The top end of the leaf spring 309 (
The back shell 22 (
Variations and modifications are contemplated in the above concepts. In such variations and modifications, identical and similar characteristics, components, and features are identified by using the same numbers, but with the addition of the letters “A”, “B”, “C” and etc. This is done to reduce redundant discussion and not for another purpose.
It is contemplated that the leaf springs can be insert-molded into the edge strips of the back shell. The physical location would be similar to that shown in
A back construction 21B (
It is preferred that the leaf springs be coupled to the edge strips of the back shell in a juxtaposed manner that causes the leaf springs to support the edge strips continuous along their length during all conditions of flexure. Where this occurs, it has been discovered that the lower edge of the back shell can be controlled well enough, and also the lumbar flexure can be controlled well enough, such that the lower edge of the back shell does not have to be attached to a track, guide, or linkage. This in effect gives the lower edge of the back shell an additional degree of freedom not previously provided in back constructions, since the lower edge of the back shell is free to move and it is the internal structure of the lumbar region and back shell that provides flexural control in the lumbar region. It is considered surprising and unexpected that the lower edge of the back shell can be left unattached . . . such that it merely abuttingly slides on whatever it engages. Notably, the lower edge of the back shell can engage the back frame or can engage another vertical structure such as a wall or upright (i.e., without the lower edge of the back shell being attached to the structure that it abuts). It is contemplated that a bushing or slippery surface or roller can be added to a lower rear edge of the back shell or to the mating front surface of the back frame to facilitate a smooth sliding motion of the back shell during flexure of the lumbar region.
An important reason for the integral leaf springs of the present invention is as follows. A flexible back shell can be designed to move and change shape to mimic the shapes of the human back as the lumbar is flexed. But when made from a flexible thin plastic, it is potentially possible to bend the back shell in additional ways that don't represent human shapes (i.e., “non-human-like” shapes such as “S” shapes).
In the present latest invention, fiberglass leaf springs (or metal leaf springs or springs made of other materials) are integrated into the flexible side bands that connect the relatively rigid upper thoracic and lower pelvis parts of the back shell. These strong leaf springs not only provide the forces necessary for full back support, but also are constructed to provide additional rigidity to the shell so unwanted deflections are minimized or eliminated. For example, when fiberglass springs that are substantially stiffer than the back shell material are integrated into the side bands, it is very difficult to deform them into an “S” shape. Further, it is unlikely for this undesirable shape to happen during normal use, even without the additional constraints of the upper and lower pivots. Because most of the unwanted deformations are eliminated with the addition of the fiberglass leaf springs, a simpler support system for the back shell is practical. The simplified support system can, for example, consist of the same upper pivots in the thoracic area and a simpler guide system in the pelvic area. The simplified guide system controls only the path of the lower back shell and not its rotation (as contrasted to a pivot). The simplified system can be packaged more easily into the support structure and can be located at or behind the comfort surface potentially without loss of comfort to a seated user.
A seating unit 20C (
The guiding device at bottom location 25C (
In one modified version, one or more studs 81D are extended downwardly from a bottom of the back frame 23C. It is contemplated that the studs 81D can be used to releasably engage a receiver tube. For example, this can be used for stadium seating where it is desirable to remove the seating unit periodically for cleaning or to take it out of bad weather (such as in stadium seating).
The seating unit 20E (
A seating unit 20F (
The guiding device at bottom location 25F (
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 293833 | Winchester | Feb 1884 | A |
| 362796 | Tait | May 1887 | A |
| 1590240 | Gorton | Jun 1926 | A |
| 2087254 | Herold | Jul 1937 | A |
| 2139028 | Mensendicck et al. | Dec 1938 | A |
| 2471024 | Cramer | May 1949 | A |
| 2492107 | Orton et al. | Dec 1949 | A |
| 2627898 | Jackson | Feb 1953 | A |
| 2712346 | Sprinkle | Jul 1955 | A |
| 2818911 | Syak | Jan 1958 | A |
| 2894565 | Conner | Jul 1959 | A |
| 3106423 | Schwarz | Oct 1963 | A |
| 3369840 | Dufton | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3540777 | de Beaumont | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3565482 | Blodee | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3813148 | Kraus | May 1974 | A |
| 3877750 | Scholpp | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3926286 | Johnson | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3934932 | Ekornes | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3938858 | Drabert et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3948558 | Obermeier et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3982785 | Ambasz | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3989297 | Kerstholt | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4007962 | Muller-Deisig | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4054318 | Costin | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4083209 | Sloan, Jr. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4084850 | Ambasz | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4099775 | Mizelle | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4157203 | Ambasz | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4181357 | Swenson et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4226473 | Johnson | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4309206 | Michaud et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4314728 | Faiks | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4316632 | Brauning | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4333683 | Ambasz | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4380352 | Diffrient | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4390206 | Faiks et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4449752 | Yasumatsu et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4452486 | Zapf et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4465317 | Schwarz | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4502728 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4521053 | de Boer | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4544204 | Schmale | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4585272 | Ballarini | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4595237 | Nelsen | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4621864 | Hill | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4621866 | Zani | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4632454 | Naert | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4638679 | Tannenlaufer | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4641884 | Miyashita et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4685730 | Linguanotto | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4703974 | Brauning | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4709963 | Uecker et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4720142 | Holdredge et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4730871 | Sheldon | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4763950 | Tobler | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4776633 | Knoblock et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4779925 | Heinzel | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4834453 | Makiol | May 1989 | A |
| 4834454 | Dicks | May 1989 | A |
| 4842333 | Meiller | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4848837 | Volke | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4854641 | Reineman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4861108 | Acton et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4878710 | Tacker | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4880271 | Graves | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889384 | Sulzer | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4892356 | Pittman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4896918 | Hoshihara | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4906045 | Hofman | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4913303 | Harris | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4915449 | Piretti | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4948198 | Crossman | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4951995 | Teppo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4966413 | Palarski | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4968093 | Dal Monte | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4981326 | Heidmann | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4984846 | Ekornes | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5009466 | Perry | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5027022 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5029940 | Golynsky et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5037116 | Desanta | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5039163 | Tolleson | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5044693 | Yokota | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5050930 | Schuster et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5056862 | May et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062676 | Mars | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5087098 | Ishizuka | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5100200 | Keusch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100201 | Becker, III et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102196 | Kaneda et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5106157 | Nagelkirk et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5107720 | Hatfield | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110003 | MacWilliams | May 1992 | A |
| 5112108 | Zapf | May 1992 | A |
| 5120109 | Rangoni | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5192114 | Hollington et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193880 | Keusch et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5217278 | Harrison et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5240308 | Goldstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5249839 | Faiks et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5277475 | Brandes | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282670 | Karsten et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5299851 | Lin | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5302002 | Nagasaka | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308145 | Koepke et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318346 | Roossien et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5320410 | Faiks | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328242 | Steffens et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5354120 | Volkle | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364162 | Bar et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366274 | Roericht et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385388 | Faiks et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5405188 | Hanson | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5423593 | Nagashima | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5447356 | Snijders | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5449086 | Harris | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452868 | Kanigowski | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5460427 | Serber | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5472261 | Oplenskdal et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5474360 | Chang | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5487591 | Knoblock | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5505520 | Frusti et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5518294 | Ligon, Sr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5529201 | Tallent et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5540481 | Roossien et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5564783 | Elzenbeck et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5573302 | Harrison et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5577807 | Hodge et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582459 | Hama et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590932 | Olivieri | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597203 | Hubbard | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5611598 | Knoblock | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5630647 | Heidmann et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5636898 | Dixon et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5651584 | Chenot et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5660439 | Unwalla | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5782536 | Heidmann | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791733 | van Hekken | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5860701 | Jungjohann et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868467 | Moll | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871258 | Battey | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5915788 | Schneider | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5947558 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5975634 | Knoblock et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6003943 | Schneider | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6035901 | Stumpf | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6099075 | Watkins | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6135559 | Kowalski | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6250715 | Caruso | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6367876 | Caruso | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6412869 | Pearce | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6474737 | Canteleux et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6523898 | Ball et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6536841 | Pearce et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6609755 | Koepke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6669292 | Koepke et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6679553 | Battey et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6709058 | Diffrient | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7032971 | Williams | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 20020003366 | Fourrey et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020047297 | Longhi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130540 | Rajasingham | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163233 | Craft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180248 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030071500 | Dinkel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030094841 | McMillen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137171 | Deimen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189367 | Erker | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214166 | Schambre et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 47-14408 | Oct 1972 | JP |
| S47-14408 | Oct 1972 | JP |
| 5-184432 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| H5-184432 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050275264 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |