This invention relates to a back pressure regulator (BPR) for use in a paint circulating system.
Traditional paint spray systems, of the type employed in car manufacturing, may consist of several (say 30) separate paint lines, each providing a different coloured paint to the spray booth. In general, only one colour is sprayed at any one time so only one line is actively employed at any instance. However, even when not being sprayed, it is necessary to circulate the paint in each line through the system at a minimum velocity to prevent the pigments from separating from the carrier fluid.
To ensure that the paint is at the required pressure for spraying, a BPR is used in combination with the paint pump to regulate and maintain the required fluid back pressure at the spray booth. In traditional systems, the BPR is adjusted manually and uses a coil spring, which is used to maintain the paint pressure upstream of the regulator by controlling the fluid flow rate. Also, in many systems (such as those employing certain types of turbine or lobe pumps) the pump will be set to operate at a fixed pressure and flow rate and the BPR used to maintain the set pressure. In this type of system, the BPR controls system pressure by adjusting flow rate to compensate for variations in the amount of fluid used at the paint ‘take offs’. Thus, each line is usually operated at the flow conditions required for spraying, whether the paint is being used or merely circulated. This is extremely inefficient and results in a large waste of energy. For example, a system operating 24 hours a day may only be required to spray each individual colour for, say, 1 hour a day. Each pump would be operated at the pressure and flow rate required to meet the system requirement for 24 hours a day even though the paint is only required to operate at that pressure for 1 hour a day.
In addition, a pump that is required to operate at a higher speed and pressure for a longer period of time is likely to require maintenance in a much shorter period of time than one that is used more conservatively.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved BPR for use in a paint circulation system, which alleviates the aforementioned problems.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a paint circulating system back pressure regulator comprising a flow passage for paint, at least part of which is disposed between a fixed structure and a moveable surface which is moveable to vary the width of the flow passage so as to regulate a pressure of paint upstream of the regulator; and a chamber having an opening for communicating with a supply of a pressurised fluid for controlling operation of the regulator.
Conveniently, the moveable surface is a surface of a flexible membrane. The pressurised fluid may be compressed air.
It is an advantage that operation of the regulator can be remotely controlled to suit operational requirements. As such, the back pressure regulator can easily perform in different modes depending on whether the paint is being used or merely being circulated. This means the system can be operated more efficiently and energy can be conserved. In addition, individual components in the system will suffer less wear and should last longer.
It is therefore convenient that the regulator can be remotely adjusted to supply line pressure when the paint is required for use at the spray booth and to reduce line pressure when the paint is not required at the spray booth.
It is also desirable that the size of the flow passage is automatically adjusted to maintain a desired system pressure.
The pressure of the pressurised fluid supplied to the system may be varied to control the restriction or flow of paint through the flow passage. Two or more air chambers may be employed to provide a cumulative effect.
In a particular embodiment, the pressurised fluid may be supplied to increase the pressure applied by the moveable surface of the BPR, thereby requiring the paint in the system to increase in pressure before flowing through the BPR. This is achieved by utilizing the pressurised fluid to push down on the moveable surface and thereby constrict the flow passage. This mode of operation is required when the paint is in use and some paint is being taken from the system. When the paint is not in use and none is being taken out of the system, un-pressurised flow can be achieved by switching off or reducing the pressure of the pressurised fluid supply.
In another embodiment of the BPR a resilient biasing means is provided to set the required back pressure and the pressurised fluid utilized to relieve (i.e. to counteract) the biasing effect. The biasing means may be employed in this system to limit the flow passage when the pressurised fluid is not supplied. The biasing means may be a coiled spring and is, conveniently, of adjustable strength.
Thus, when paint is being used, the pressurised fluid (e.g. compressed air) supply can be switched off or reduced to allow the spring to pressurise the paint system. The pressurised fluid (e.g. compressed air) can be supplied to decrease the pressure applied by the spring and thereby de-pressurise the paint in the system. This may be achieved by utilizing the compressed air to push upwards against a downwardly biased spring so as to open the flow passage.
An advantage of this embodiment is that the BPR will still operate to ensure the paint is at the required system pressure even if the pressurised fluid (e.g. compressed air) supply fails. Thus, the paint will always be pressurised for use and so no loss in fluid system pressure will occur at the spray booth.
Particular embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to the drawings, a paint circulation system 40 employing a BPR 45 is shown in
In this set-up, the BPR 45 is employed to control the upstream pressure in the system at the desired level, typically 5 to 10 bar when the paint is in use.
A prior art back pressure regulator (BPR) 10, for use in a paint circulation system 40, is shown in
As can be seen from
In operation, paint will flow into the BPR 10 via the inlet path 30. The spring 15 will be set to apply a desired pressure on the diaphragm 20. Thus, the pressure of incoming paint trying to pass through the BPR 10 will act on the diaphragm 20 against the force of the spring 15. If the incoming paint pressure is greater than the pressure from the spring 15, it will force diaphragm 20 away from the structure 34 thereby creating a wider flow path 35 to relieve the pressure. If the incoming paint pressure drops, the pressure from the spring 15 will become more dominant and will force the diaphragm 20 towards the structure 34 thereby creating a narrower flow path 35. In this way the BPR will continue to iron out the effects of pressure fluctuations in the system. The result of which is that the paint pressure upstream of the BPR 10 is kept relatively constant. This is particularly desirable when the line is in use as some paint will be taken out of the system, tending to reduce the paint flow and/or pressure of paint circulating around the system. However, as described above the BPR 10 will automatically compensate for this loss by reducing the flow to maintain the desired pressure in the system.
The main problem with this type of BPR 10 is unnecessary use of energy to pressurise paint upstream of the BPR 10 when it is not required for spraying. Pumping paint at this high pressure level also wears out the pump more quickly than if it is used more economically.
An example of a particular BPR 50, according to the present invention, is shown in
A vertically moveable member or diaphragm plate 58 is disposed above the first diaphragm 69. A second diaphragm 59 is positioned above the moveable member 58. An air chamber 60 is provided between the opposite side of the diaphragm 59 and a chamber cap 68. A housing 61, containing the member 58 and the air chamber 60, is fastened by means of a threaded fastener arrangement 62a to the valve body 51, trapping the outer regions of the first diaphragm 69 to provide a seal and prevent any paint loss. The second diaphragm 59 is similarly trapped between an outer rim of the chamber cap 68 and the housing 61 by means of fasteners 62b. The moveable member 58 can move vertically within a clearance cavity 67 in the housing 61. An air vent 63 is also provided in the housing 61 to allow ambient air surrounding the member 58 to flow into and out of the cavity 67 as the member 58 moves. The second diaphragm 59 provides a seal between the air chamber 60 and the cavity 67. An air inlet 64 is provided in the air chamber cap 68 for attachment to a compressed air supply.
Vertical movement of the member 58, together with flexing of the first and second diaphragms 59, 69, varies the size of the flow path 57. When no pressurised air is supplied to the chamber 60, the member 58 will be free to move up and down within the housing 61. Thus, the pressure of paint entering the BPR 50 will act on the first diaphragm 69 to force the member 58 away from the structure 56 with very little resistance. This opens up the flow passage 57 between the first diaphragm 69 and the structure 56, resulting in only a small pressure drop across the BPR 50.
When the force supplied by the compressed air in the chamber 60 becomes large enough, the second diaphragm 59 will flex downwardly and force the moveable member 58 into contact with the first diaphragm 69 and towards the structure 56, thereby constricting the flow path 57. If the difference between the air pressure and the paint pressure is large enough the first diaphragm 69 may be forced into contact with the structure 56 to completely seal the flow path 57.
In operation, paint will flow into the BPR 50 via the inlet path 52. The air pressure in the chamber 60 will be set to apply the desired force on the moveable member 58, to regulate the pressure of paint upstream of the BPR. Thus, if the incoming paint pressure is increases, it will force the first diaphragm 69 and the moveable member 58 away from structure 56 thereby creating a wider flow path 57. This allows more paint to flow through the BPR 50, thereby relieving the upstream pressure to bring it back to the set point. If the incoming paint pressure drops, the air pressure acting on the second diaphragm 59 and the moveable member 58 will force them towards the structure 56, creating a narrower flow path 57, restricting paint flow through the BPR 50 and increasing the upstream pressure to bring it back to the set point. Thus, the BPR 50 will perform the same function as BPR 10 under these conditions, and the pressure of paint upstream of the BPR 50 will be kept nearly constant.
For the BPR 50, the applied air pressure to the chamber 60 determines the pressure of paint in the system. Accordingly, the system paint pressure can be varied by simply varying the air pressure supplied to chamber 60. This can be done remotely by control of the air supply.
In the arrangement shown in
The applied air pressure in this embodiment can be considered to perform essentially the same function as the spring 15 shown in
The system operation may be controlled and monitored via a computer or network. Thus, operation of the pump 42 can be controlled and transducers used to monitor pressures from a remote location. The present system also allows operation of the BPR 50 to be controlled remotely by a computer.
A further embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Air supply inlets (not shown) are provided to connect the chambers 73 and 74 to an air supply. Air pressure supplied to the two chambers 73, 74 acts on the two surfaces 75 and 76, to create a large total surface area as an alternative to the single, wide surface area 65 of the embodiment in
As can be seen, air pressure in this BPR 70 is employed to act against the downward force from the spring 71. This is because air pressure applied to chambers 73 and 74 acts on the lower surfaces 75 and 76 of the moveable members 77 and 78. In this way, supplied air pressure can be used to override the spring 71 to open up the flow path and allow paint to flow through the BPR 70 without restriction.
When this BPR 70 is in operation, and paint is being used, pressurised air (or other fluid) is not supplied to the chambers 73 and 74. With no air pressure in chamber 73, there is no resistance to the spring force from above, which is transmitted through the posts 81, 85, 86 and moveable members 77, 78 to the element 84 and the main diaphragm 93. This acts against the pressure of paint, tending to constrict the flow path 95 to maintain the upstream paint pressure. In this configuration, the BPR 70 acts in the same way as the BPR 10 of
As with the BPR 10, the pressure in the system is determined by the applied spring force, which is relayed to the element 84. Accordingly, the screw 72 can be used to adjust the set system paint pressure. This is usually set to provide a conveniently high system pressure as is suitable for when the paint is in use.
However, the advantage of this BPR 70 is that supplying appropriate air pressure to the chambers 73 and 74 can effectively turn off the high pressure force of spring 71. Thus, air pressure in these chambers 73 and 74 will act to push the diaphragms 79 and 80 upwardly so that air can move underneath the moveable members 77 and 78 to act on the surfaces 75 and 76. This will counteract the downward pressure on the plates 82 and 83 forcing them in an upward direction. As the moveable members 77 and 78 move upwards under air pressure, the third post 86 is lifted away from the element 84, allowing it to move freely. Consequently the element 84 will provide no downward force on the main diaphragm 93 so that paint will flow through the BPR 70 without restriction. This mode of operation is desirable when the paint is not in use and it is necessary simply to circulate the paint at a minimum velocity to prevent the pigments from separating from the carrier fluid.
Although, the on-off function, as described above, is the primary reason for supplying air pressure to the BPR 70, it is also possible to use this set-up to remotely vary the force from the spring 71. Thus without adjusting the screw 72, air pressure can be supplied to either one or both air chambers 73, 74 to vary the force acting down on the element 84. A relatively low air pressure will marginally reduce the force of the spring 71 on the element 84 while a relatively high air pressure will greatly reduce the force of the spring 71 on the element 84. As such, a constant air pressure can be supplied to set the desired system pressure.
The BPR 70 is constructed from a bell-shaped portion 101 which surrounds the spring 71. Separate housing portions 88, 92, surround the respective air chambers 73 and 74. A body portion 98 includes a structure 94 for defining the flow path between an inlet port 96 and an outlet port 97. These portions can be assembled in a modular fashion such that any number of housing portions 88, 92, and therefore air chambers 73, 74, can be included. Aligned bolt holes in the housings provide channels 99 through which tie-bolts (not shown) can be inserted to clamp the modular components together. As with the BPR 50 of
As with the BPR 50 of
The present invention enables an operator to automatically pressurise or depressurise a paint circulation system in accordance with the needs at the applicator. Thus, the BPR can be automatically charged to supply line pressure or discharged to reduce line pressure. This ability provides great savings with regards to energy usage and system component wear.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0518637.4 | Sep 2005 | GB | national |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/064,853filed Feb. 26, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,733,392, entitled “Back Pressure Regulator,” which claims priority from International Application No. PCT/IB2006/002503 filed Sep. 12, 2006, which claims priority from British Application No. 0518637.4 filed Sep. 13, 2005, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2244686 | Garrison et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
3169402 | Baker | Feb 1965 | A |
3175473 | Boteler et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3286977 | Miottel | Nov 1966 | A |
3720373 | Levey | Mar 1973 | A |
3730773 | Graber | May 1973 | A |
3816025 | O'Neill | Jun 1974 | A |
3939855 | Wiggins | Feb 1976 | A |
3958724 | Ordway | May 1976 | A |
3981320 | Wiggins | Sep 1976 | A |
4005825 | Schowiak | Feb 1977 | A |
4009971 | Krohn et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4019653 | Scherer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4062220 | Taube et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4085892 | Dalton | Apr 1978 | A |
4116259 | Koskimies et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4215721 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4231382 | Beerens | Nov 1980 | A |
4231392 | Allibert | Nov 1980 | A |
4232055 | Shaffer | Nov 1980 | A |
4252476 | Koppers et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4265858 | Crum et al. | May 1981 | A |
4281683 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4295489 | Arends et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4311724 | Scharfenberger | Jan 1982 | A |
4313475 | Wiggins | Feb 1982 | A |
4337282 | Springer | Jun 1982 | A |
4348425 | Scharfenberger | Sep 1982 | A |
4350720 | Scharfenberger | Sep 1982 | A |
4375865 | Springer | Mar 1983 | A |
4376523 | Goyen | Mar 1983 | A |
4380321 | Culbrertson et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4390126 | Buchholz et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4397610 | Krohn | Aug 1983 | A |
4487367 | Perry et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4497341 | Wright | Feb 1985 | A |
4509684 | Schowiak | Apr 1985 | A |
4516601 | Chanal et al. | May 1985 | A |
4545401 | Karpis | Oct 1985 | A |
4549572 | Wright | Oct 1985 | A |
4569480 | Levey | Feb 1986 | A |
RE32151 | Scharfenberger | May 1986 | E |
4592305 | Scharfenberger | Jun 1986 | A |
4593360 | Cocks | Jun 1986 | A |
4627465 | Kolibas et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4653532 | Powers | Mar 1987 | A |
4657047 | Kolibas | Apr 1987 | A |
4660771 | Chabert et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4700896 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706885 | Morin | Nov 1987 | A |
4714179 | Otterstetter et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4728034 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4750523 | Crouse | Jun 1988 | A |
4776368 | Drozd | Oct 1988 | A |
4785760 | Tholome | Nov 1988 | A |
4792092 | Elberson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4813603 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4828218 | Medlock | May 1989 | A |
4830055 | Kolibas | May 1989 | A |
4844706 | Katsuyama et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4846226 | Merritt | Jul 1989 | A |
4878622 | Jamison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4881563 | Christian | Nov 1989 | A |
4884752 | Plummer | Dec 1989 | A |
4902352 | Christian | Feb 1990 | A |
4909180 | Oishi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915599 | Katsuyama et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917296 | Konieczynski | Apr 1990 | A |
4928883 | Weinstein | May 1990 | A |
4936340 | Potter et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936507 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
4936509 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
4936510 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
4957060 | Cann | Sep 1990 | A |
4962724 | Prus et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4982903 | Jamison et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993353 | Ogasawara et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014645 | Cann et al. | May 1991 | A |
5033942 | Petersen | Jul 1991 | A |
5058805 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058812 | Cox et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064680 | Cann et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5072881 | Taube, III | Dec 1991 | A |
5074237 | Ogasawara | Dec 1991 | A |
5094596 | Erwin et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5096120 | Luckarz | Mar 1992 | A |
5096126 | Giroux et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100057 | Wacker et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102045 | Diana | Apr 1992 | A |
5102046 | Diana | Apr 1992 | A |
5146950 | Rodgers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152466 | Matushita et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5154357 | Jamison et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5171613 | Bok et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192595 | Akeel et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193750 | LaMontagne et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195680 | Holt | Mar 1993 | A |
5196067 | Lacchia | Mar 1993 | A |
5197676 | Konieczynski et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199650 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205488 | Heusser | Apr 1993 | A |
5220259 | Werner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221047 | Akeel et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223306 | Bartow | Jun 1993 | A |
5228842 | Guebeli et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5249748 | Lacchia et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255856 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269567 | Kubota et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271569 | Konieczynski et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5306350 | Hoy et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309403 | Bartow | May 1994 | A |
5328093 | Feitel | Jul 1994 | A |
5336063 | Lehrke et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5397063 | Weinstein | Mar 1995 | A |
5411210 | Gimple et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413283 | Gimple et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433587 | Bankert et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5460297 | Shannon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485941 | Guyomard et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5549755 | Milovich et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5632816 | Allen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632822 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5676756 | Murate et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5701922 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725150 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725358 | Bert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746831 | Allen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5787928 | Allen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5853027 | Winkel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854190 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863352 | Gonda | Jan 1999 | A |
5865380 | Kazama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5944045 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6056008 | Adams et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077354 | Kaneski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6154355 | Alterburger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168824 | Barlow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6305419 | Krieger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6382220 | Kefauver | May 2002 | B1 |
6423143 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6533488 | Blenkush et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6612345 | Hosoda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619563 | Van der Steur | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627266 | Dion | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6712021 | Pollock | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712906 | Estelle et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722257 | Yoh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755913 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6821096 | Kosmyna et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6976072 | Mathieson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7026365 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030101931 | Estelle et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040001765 | Wood | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030428 | Crampton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056045 | Kosmyna et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040154532 | Ramsay | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050152789 | Kapron | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060177565 | Bhattacharya et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193731 | Lindzion et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070075163 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070122555 | Jones | May 2007 | A1 |
20070207260 | Collmer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0347607 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0842706 | May 1998 | EP |
1830966 | May 2008 | EP |
2656348 | Jun 1991 | FR |
1155328 | Jun 1969 | GB |
2005285436 | Feb 1993 | JP |
0567349 | Sep 1993 | JP |
2000346233 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2008012406 | Jan 2008 | JP |
520315 | Feb 2003 | TW |
570841 | Jan 2004 | TW |
WO2005061889 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005075793 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2007029094 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007031841 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007032827 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Xu and Koelling, “Development of a Closed Loop Paint Circulation System for Non-Newtonian Waterbone Coatings,” 2006 SAE World Congress Apr. 3-6, 2006, Detroit Michigan. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2006/002503 mailed Feb. 27, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140264108 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12064853 | US | |
Child | 14227632 | US |