Back to back mounted compound woofer with compression/bandpass loading

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6628792
  • Patent Number
    6,628,792
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 30, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 30, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Kuntz; Curtis
    • Ni; Suhan
    Agents
    • Brown; Glenn C.
Abstract
The back to back mounted compound woofer that improves sound quality by minimizing mechanical vibrations is provided. The woofer speakers of the present invention are under compression allowing for more efficient cone motion control resulting in a lower cutoff and thus, resonant, frequency. Since the compound woofer of the present invention minimizes size, material, and electrical and custom components, it is inexpensive to manufacture. A housing provides an enclosure for the compound woofer. The housing includes opposed sidewalls or side plates, each having a coaxial opening. Each of two speakers is mounted on a respective coaxial opening of a respective sidewall. Additionally, the two speakers are mounted back to back, i.e., with their magnet structures in close proximity to one another. In one embodiment, the magnet structures are coupled to one another using a flexible sealing compound such as putty. In another embodiment, the two woofers share a common unitary magnet structure. The containing volume around the speakers is made as small as physically possible by using, in one embodiment, a spiral curve member to form a substantially circular woofer housing around the woofers. The spiral curve member maintains an even distance between the two sidewalls and supports the two sidewalls. The spiral curve member forms an exit that is the main exhaust of the two woofers. In other embodiments, the containing volume around the speakers is minimized using a six-sided box or a tube. The box or tube housing is confined within an external enclosure. A vent connects the box or tube and the enclosure for venting the pair of speakers to the outside.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates generally to a speaker (or audio transducer) for reproducing bass frequencies and, more particularly, to a back to back mounted compound woofer with compression/bandpass loading.




2. Description of the Prior Art




The prior art in woofer designs is very well known and can be characterized by the quest for greater performance in ever-smaller packages. Large woofers in small boxes with very high power modifiers employing motional feedback to maintain linearity are commonly found now. If capable of good sound quality they are quite expensive and because of the extraordinary punishment delivered to the transducer to overcome the physical constraints inherent in these designs, can develop mechanical trouble and fail over time.




It should be noted that this new invention is not antagonist to these other design approaches, indeed a marriage could be quite beneficial, but that very conservatively designed transducers employing modest power amplifiers can yield exceptional results in an acceptable package size and cost.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A pair of woofer speakers or low frequency transducers, when mounted and operated as disclosed herein will exhibit a lower resonant frequency, higher sensitivity (or conversion of electrical to acoustic power), and better rejection of frequencies above its desired operating range, than would be expected, by well known calculations.




The device is very stable mechanically and because of this, unwanted or parasitic vibrations are practically non-existent. This allows use of a much more lightly constructed enclosed without extensive cross bracing than would otherwise be employed. It is also very advantageous in car applications where available mounting panels are by nature, flimsy.




A housing provides an enclosure for the compound woofer. The housing includes opposed sidewalls or side plates, each having a coaxial opening. Each of two speakers is mounted on a respective coaxial opening of a respective sidewall. Additionally, the two speakers are mounted back to back, i.e., with their magnet structures in close proximity to one another. In one embodiment, the magnet structures are coupled to one another using a flexible sealing compound such as putty. In another embodiment, the two speakers share a common unitary magnet structure. The containing volume around the speakers is made as small as physically possible by using, in one embodiment, a spiral curve member to form a substantially circular woofer housing around the speakers. The spiral curve member forms an first enclosed channel that is the main exhaust of the two woofers. A curve member together with the spiral curve member forms a primary vent for venting the woofer output. The spiral curve member and the curve member maintain an even distance between the two sidewalls and support the two sidewalls. In other embodiments, the containing volume around the speakers is minimized using a six-sided box or a tube. The box or tube housing is confined within an external enclosure. A vent connects the box or tube and the enclosure for venting the pair of speakers to the outside.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment that proceeds with reference to the following drawings.





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a first embodiment of the back to back mounted compound woofer of the present invention;





FIG. 2A

is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the magnet structure of the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 2B

is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the magnet structure of the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a diagram of the unitary magnet shown in

FIG. 2B

;





FIG. 4A

is a side view of the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 4B

is a side view of another embodiment of the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 5

is a side view of a second embodiment of the back to back mounted compound woofer of the present invention;





FIG. 6A

is an end view of one embodiment of the housing for the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 5

;





FIG. 6B

is an end view of another embodiment of the housing for the back to back mounted compound woofer shown in

FIG. 5

;





FIG. 7

is a side view of the second embodiment of the back to back mounted compound woofer of the present invention with a vent; and





FIG. 8

is a side view of the second embodiment of the back to back mounted compound woofer of the present invention without a vent.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIG. 1

, the compound woofer


10


includes an outer enclosure


12


for supporting a speaker housing


14


. The housing


14


includes two opposed sidewalls or side plates


16


, each having a curved portion


18


, a sloped portion


20


, a straight portion


22


, and a face portion


24


. The housing


14


includes a faceplate


26


communicating with the face portion


24


and having an opening


28


. The opening


28


together with the housing


14


form a first enclosed channel that is main exhaust of the speakers


32


A and


32


B. The faceplate


26


overlays the enclosure


12


for providing an aesthetically pleasing front end to the compound woofer


10


.




Each sidewall


16


includes a coaxial opening


30


for mounting a speaker


32


A or


32


B to the housing


14


. The two sidewalls are connected together and maintained at a predetermined distance from each other through a spiral curve member


34


and a curve member


35


. The housing


14


can be made of a variety of materials including wood, plywood, cardboard fiber material, plastic, and the like. Since the spiral curve member


34


and the curve member


35


curve around the speakers


32


A and


32


B, they must be made of a flexible material such as plywood, e.g., the flexible plywood WiggleWood® manufactured by North American Plywood Corporation of California. A person skilled in the art should recognize that the housing


14


could also be manufactured using injection-molded processes by, for example, dividing the housing into halves and later fusing the halves together. An injection molded housing


14


is particularly suited for high volume, smaller systems such as those used in cars.




The compound woofer


10


includes two speakers


32


A and


32


B as best shown in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

. The speaker


32


A includes a cone section


38


A at a first end and a magnet structure


42


A at a second end. Similarly, the speaker


32


B includes a cone section


38


B at a first end and a magnet structure


42


B at a second end. As mentioned above, the speakers


32


A and


32


B are mounted at their respective cone ends


38


A and


38


B to the coaxial opening


30


of a respective sidewall


16


. Additionally, the speakers


32


A and


32


B are mounted back to back.




One embodiment of the compound woofer


10


is shown in FIG.


2


A. In

FIG. 2A

, the speakers


32


A and


32


B have distinct and separable magnet structures


42


A and


42


B that are placed in close proximity to one another. In the preferred embodiment, the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B are joined together using a sealing compound


44


. The sealing compound can be any of a variety of flexible adhesives, e.g., putty. The magnet structures


42


A and


42


B are preferably about 1-2 millimeters apart from each other.




Another embodiment of the compound woofer


10


is shown in

FIG. 2B

where the speakers


32


A and


32


B share a common unitary magnet structure


40


. The unitary magnet structure


40


obviates the need for the sealing compound


44


and reduces the overall weight of the compound speaker. The unity magnet


40


makes more efficient use of the available magnetic material and eliminates the usual back plates of the two district magnet structures


42


A and


42


B. The main benefit of the unitary magnet


40


is a large reduction in the overall weight of the system for a given result—most important for car applications.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the unitary magnet


40


comprises a top ring magnet


62


sandwiched between two top plates


63


. A bottom ring magnet


64


is also sandwiched between two plates


65


.




A long central pole piece


68


is suspended from a non-ferrous pole suspension ring


66


. The pole piece


68


forms the return path for the two annular magnetic gaps thus formed. The unitary magnet


40


shown in

FIGS. 2B and 3

includes magnetic common to moving cone assemblies. The operation of unitary magnets, like unitary magnet


40


, is well known and will not be described in further detail.




In either of the two embodiments shown in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

, the speakers


32


A and


32


B are in such close proximity to each other to achieve magnetic coupling resulting in inherent magnetic shielding. That is, the magnetic fields of the magnet structures


42


A,


42


B, and


40


cancel each other. In some applications, e.g., TV or video, additional shielding may be desirable to further reduce electromagnetic interference. A simple metal sleeve (not shown) over the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B or


40


can be used as the additional shielding.




The above-described mounting configuration results in the speakers being placed under a compressive load that improves cone motion control and lowers the cutoff and, thus, resonant frequency. The point of resonance is the point of maximum efficiency of a speaker. In a woofer system, the resonant frequency is important because it defines the maximum power output for a given power input. The cutoff frequency is optimized for the type of system designed. For example, the cutoff frequency in a car woofer system is set to around 80 Hz because of the added boost inherent in such enclosed environments. Setting the frequency response in a car woofer system to 80 Hz ensures a smooth response down to about 35-40 Hz. If, for example, the cutoff frequency in a car woofer system is set around 40 Hz, a generally undesirable deep bass dominates the sound output.




Unlike conventional woofer systems where the output of the system is at the cone of the speakers, the output of the compound woofer


10


is at the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B. The back to back mounting configuration of the speakers


32


A and


32


B allows the cones


38


A and


38


B to move together in an additive manner. The back to back mounting configuration cancels out the displacement of the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B because they move at the same time in opposite directions. At the same time, the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B do not displace because they are magnetically coupled to one another as explained above. The result is an elimination of the mechanical vibration of both the cones


38


A and


38


B and the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B shown in

FIG. 2A

or the magnet structure


40


shown in FIG.


2


B. Minimization of the mechanical vibration of the speakers


32


A and


32


B eliminates unwanted noise propagating through the system improving overall sound performance.




Referring now to

FIG. 4A

, the housing


14


includes a first channel or vent


46


defined by the curve member


35


on one side and by the spiral curve member


34


on the other. The first channel


46


is sized to minimize sound distortion. The bigger the first channel


46


, the lower the sound distortion. The first channel


46


is preferably sized equal in cross sectional area to a second channel


48


that forms the main exhaust out of the speakers


32


A and


32


B. The curved shape of the first channel


46


allows for a relatively long vent in a relatively small enclosure. The housing


14


also includes a second channel


48


defined by the spiral curve member


34


. As mentioned above, the second channel


48


is the main exit or exhaust


36


of the speakers


32


A and


32


B.




Another embodiment of the compound woofer


10


is shown in FIG.


4


B. In

FIG. 4B

, the housing


14


includes an outer member


39


surrounding a curve member


35


. Curve member


35


forms a substantially circular speaker housing. Curve member


35


includes an opening


37


in communication with a single channel


49


that surrounds the speakers


32


A and


32


B. Opening


37


and channel


49


serves as the main exhaust for speakers


32


A and


32


B.




The compression of the first and second enclosed channels


46


and


48


, respectively, on the speakers


32


A and


32


B is about ⅕ to ⅙ of the cone areas


38


A and


38


B, respectively. The compression ratios disclosed were arrived at empirically. Other compression ratios are possible. The tighter the compression ratio, the smaller the overall enclosure can be for a given low frequency cutoff—all other things being equal. However, conversion efficiency is reduced as the compression ratio tightens.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, the compound woofer


50


includes a pair of speakers


32


A and


32


B mounted in housing


51


. The speakers


32


A and


32


B are identical and wired in-phase with each other as in the embodiment shown in FIG.


1


. The speakers


32


A and


32


B are mounted to coaxial openings on respective opposed sidewalls (not shown) in a similar fashion to that described for the compound woofer


10


shown in FIG.


1


. The speakers


32


A and


32


B include respective magnet structures


42


A and


42


B that are brought in close proximity to one another. In one embodiment, the magnet structures


42


A and


42


B are sealed together using a sealing compound, e.g., putty, in between. Although not shown in

FIG. 5

, a person skilled in the art should recognize that speakers


32


A and


32


B could share a common unitary magnet such as unitary magnet


40


shown in FIG.


2


B.




Referring to

FIGS. 6A-6B

, the housing


51


is constructed having a minimal size around the speakers


32


A and


32


B. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6A

, the housing is a six-sided box


54


. In the preferred embodiment shown in

FIG. 6B

, the housing


51


is a tube. The speakers


32


A and


32


B are under a compressive load, rarefying the volume


52


of the housing


51


in step with the applied audio signal.




Referring to

FIGS. 7-8

, the cones


38


A and


38


B of the speakers


32


A and


32


B, respectively, radiate away from each other and into an enclosure


58


having a back volume


60


. The enclosure


58


can be sealed (

FIG. 8

) or vented using a vent


56


(FIG.


7


). The vent


56


preferably has a tubular shape. The vent


56


has a size and volume that are determined relative to the size of the speakers used and the frequency response desired. In the preferred embodiment, the vent


56


has a diameter about ⅕ the working cone area of the speakers


32


A or


32


B and a vent length equal to about twice the diameter of the vent. An advantage of this system is that the tube housing


51


(

FIG. 6B

) or box housing


54


(

FIG. 6A

) is much smaller than that used for the conventional band pass system.




The compound woofers


10


and


50


can be used with 4, 6, or 8-inch speakers. However, using 8-inch speakers is preferred in the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

since it provides for a containment volume of about 2 cubic feet and high performance down to about 20 Hz. Using 8-inch speakers also allows the thickness of the sidewalls


16


to be about ½ inch substantially reducing its cost relative to conventional woofer systems requiring ¾ inch thick walls with additional bracing.




Having illustrated and described the principles of my invention in a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. I claim all modifications coming within the spirit and scope of the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A balanced compound compression woofer, comprising:a housing having opposed sidewalls, and including a spiral curve member defining a substantially circular woofer housing; a coaxial opening in each of the sidewalls; a pair of speakers mounted back to back in the housing, each speaker including a cone having a cross-sectional area, and being attached to a respective sidewall; an enclosure for containing the housing; and a tubular vent connecting the housing and the enclosure for venting the pair of speaker, the vent having a diameter substantially equal to one-fifth of the cone cross-sectional area, and a length substantially equal to twice the vent diameter.
  • 2. A balanced compound compression woofer, comprising:a housing having opposed sidewalls, and including a spiral curve member defining a substantially circular woofer housing; a coaxial opening in the sidewalls; a pair of speakers mounted back to back in the housing, each speaker being attached to a respective sidewall and the housing having a size minimized to allow for mounting the pair of speakers; a magnet operatively connected to each of the pair of speakers and operable to deflect each speaker responsive to an electrical signal, each of the pair of speakers in phase with the other when deflected by the magnet; an enclosure for containing the housing; and a tubular vent connecting the housing and the enclosure for venting the pair of speakers; each of the pair of speakers including a cone having a cone area and wherein the vent has a vent diameter substantially equal to one-fifth of the cone area and a vent length substantially equal to twice the vent diameter.
  • 3. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein the housing and the spiral curve member define a first enclosed channel for venting the pair of speakers.
  • 4. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein the housing includes an exit in communication with a first enclosed channel, the first enclosed channel being formed by the housing and the spiral curve member.
  • 5. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 4 including a faceplate having an opening for providing a primary sound output for the woofer.
  • 6. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 5 wherein each sidewall includes a curved, a sloped, a straight, and a face portion, the sloped portion communicating with the exit.
  • 7. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 6 wherein the spiral curve member defines a second enclosed channel, the first and second enclosed channels communicating with the faceplate.
  • 8. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein each of the pair of speakers includes a magnet structure, the pair of speakers being mounted with their respective magnet structures in close proximity with one another.
  • 9. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 8 including a sealing agent in between the magnet structures.
  • 10. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 9 wherein the sealing agent is putty.
  • 11. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 8 wherein the magnet structures of the pair of speakers are close enough to achieve magnetic cancellation.
  • 12. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 11 wherein the magnet structures are spaced about 1-2 millimeters from each other.
  • 13. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 8 wherein the pair of speakers is mounted with their respective magnet structures in contact with one another.
  • 14. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein the pair of speakers includes a common unitary magnet.
  • 15. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein the housing is a box.
  • 16. The balanced compound compression woofer of claim 2 wherein the housing is a tube.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/079,955 filed Mar. 30, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
1568589 Eddington Jan 1926 A
1578595 Frantz Mar 1926 A
2790164 Oberg Apr 1957 A
3393764 Schafer Jul 1968 A
4268719 Manger May 1981 A
4301332 Dusanek Nov 1981 A
5475764 Polk Dec 1995 A
5535284 Thornhill et al. Jul 1996 A
6009972 Choi et al. Jan 2000 A
6035051 Sato Mar 2000 A
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/079955 Mar 1998 US