1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an improved backboard for transporting a patient.
2. Prior Art
Backboards may be used to transport patients who have suffered severe trauma, such as a spinal cord injury, that may develop into partial or total paralysis if the patient is moved improperly. Therefore, it is imperative that backboards have sufficient rigidity with a low rate of deflection and not flex or bend under the patient's weight in order to prevent unnecessary patient movement. To further minimize the patient's movement, it may be desirable that the patient remain on the backboard when being X-rayed at a treatment center. However, if the patient remains on the backboard when being X-rayed, the backboard must be substantially X-ray translucent in order to enable a high quality, medically acceptable X-ray of the patient to be obtained.
However, prior art backboards either have a high degree of X-ray translucence while not being substantially stable, or are structurally stable without being sufficiently X-ray translucent. In particular, backboards of the prior art that are completely planar on both sides have a high degree of X-ray translucence, but are not sufficiently rigid when supporting a patient due to a lack of structural supporting members located within the board. Other prior art backboards may provide structural strength by providing supporting members within the backboard or by molding a series of ridges into the bottom side of the backboard. Although these design features provide structural rigidity, the stiffening rods and/or molded ribs appear on X-rays and can adversely affect the backboard's X-ray translucence.
Therefore, there appears a need in the art for a backboard that is lightweight, cost effective to manufacture, and sufficiently rigid to adequately support a patient while being substantially X-ray translucent.
Accordingly, the primary object of the present invention is to provide a lightweight, sufficiently rigid backboard for patient transport that is substantially X-ray translucent and inexpensive to manufacture.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a substantially X-ray translucent, lightweight backboard that has enough structural rigidity to support a patient without undue flexing or bending of the backboard under the patient's weight during transport.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a substantially X-ray translucent backboard that is constructed from a unitary piece of material with an interior core filled with an X-ray translucent material.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a sufficiently rigid backboard that does not require stiffening members or the like which may reduce the X-ray translucence of the backboard.
Another further object of the present invention is to provide a backboard having a continuous curvilinear shape along one side thereof that provides substantial X-ray translucence and structural rigidity.
These and other objects of the present invention are realized in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, described by way of example, and not by way of limitation, which provides for a rigid, substantially X-ray translucent backboard comprising a single curvilinear shaped bottom surface and an opposing planar top surface that contacts a patient with a foam-filled supporting member formed therebetween.
In brief summary, the present invention overcomes and substantially alleviates the deficiencies in the prior art by providing a sufficiently rigid and substantially X-ray translucent backboard for transporting a patient. The improved backboard comprises a planar top surface adapted to contact the patient that is structurally supported by an opposing curvilinear shaped bottom surface. Specifically, the bottom surface has a single curvilinear shape that extends the entire length of the backboard in order to provide sufficient structural support, while forming an angular orientation which provides substantial X-ray translucence to the backboard. In addition, a foam material fills the interior space between the upper planar surface and the curvilinear shaped bottom surface that allows the backboard to remain lightweight and inexpensive to manufacture without sacrificing either the X-ray translucence or structural rigidity of the backboard.
Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows and will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following more detailed description and drawings in which like elements of the invention are similarly numbered throughout.
Referring to the drawings, the preferred embodiment of the backboard is illustrated as 10 in
As shown, backboard 10 comprises a unitary, substantially rectangular shaped member that defines a front portion 12, a rear portion 14, two opposing side portions 16, and opposing top and bottom sides 20 and 22. Top side 20 provides a planar top surface adapted for supporting a patient and a single, continuous curvilinear shaped bottom side 22 with a hollow core 24 formed therebetween. In the preferred embodiment, hollow handles 18 are integrally formed along opposing side portions 16, front portion 12, and rear portion 14 that enable backboard 10 to be easily handled by one or more persons. Preferably, backboard 10 may be 71″ long as measured from front portion 12 to rear portion 14 and 15.75″ inches wide as measured from one side portion 16 to the opposing side portion 16. However, the present invention contemplates that any suitable length and width of backboard 10 that is substantially x-ray translucent and structurally rigid is felt to fall within the scope of the present invention.
Referring to
Referring back to
As further shown, curvilinear portion 26 comprises structural regions 24A and structural region 24B that extend from front portion 12 to rear portion 14 of backboard 10 and extend parallel to trough 28. Preferably, both structural region 24A and structural region 24B are positioned equidistant relative to trough 28. Since hollow core 24 is completely filled with foam 25, structural regions 24A and 24B contain significantly more foam 25 than the portion of hollow core 24 located directly above peak 28. Accordingly, the extra mass of foam 25 within structural region 24A and structural region 24B provides improved structural support to backboard 10 due to the extra mass of foam 25 along equidistant locations from trough 28. It has been found that the curvilinear portion 26 also provides backboard 10 with a structural strength and rigidity having a low deflection rate capable of supporting a 1000-pound load when carried by four people as discussed below. This low deflection rate is extremely advantageous because it shows that the patient will not bend or deflect the body of backboard 10 and is therefore not subjected to unnecessary movement when transported.
This low deflection rate is measured along the middle of the body of backboard 10 in inches as depicted in
It has also been found that if backboard 10 is carried by four people, the deflection rates are even further reduced as illustrated in
As can be seen in
It should be understood from the foregoing that, while particular embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, various modifications could be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is not intended that the invention be limited by the specification; instead, the scope of the present invention is intended to be limited only by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4893323 | Cook, III | Jan 1990 | A |
4926457 | Poehner et al. | May 1990 | A |
4949713 | Mykietiuch | Aug 1990 | A |
5048136 | Popitz | Sep 1991 | A |
5263213 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D358652 | Pretzer | May 1995 | S |
5473784 | Nixon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5568662 | Gougelet | Oct 1996 | A |
5742963 | Trevino et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765243 | Duncan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771513 | Kirchgeorg et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774916 | Kurhi | Jul 1998 | A |
D403423 | Bologovsky et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
5950627 | Bologovsky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6067678 | Trevino | May 2000 | A |
20040187214 | Holland | Sep 2004 | A1 |